Overexpression of thioredoxin reductase 1 inhibits migration of HEK-293 cells

Background information. TrxR (thioredoxin reductase), in addition to protecting against oxidative stress, plays a role in the redox regulation of intracellular signalling pathways controlling, among others, cell proliferation and apoptosis. The aim of the present study was to determine whether TrxR1 is involved in the regulation of cell migration. Results. Stably transfected HEK‐293 (human embryonic kidney) cells which overexpress cytosolic TrxR1 (HEK‐TrxR15 and HEK‐TrxR11 cells) were used in the present study. We found that the stimulation of cell motility induced by PKC (protein kinase C) activators, PMA and DPhT (diphenyltin), was inhibited significantly in the HEK‐TrxR15 and HEK‐TrxR11 cells compared with control cells. The overexpression of TrxR1 also inhibited characteristic morphological changes and reorganization of the F‐actin cytoskeleton induced by PMA and DPhT. In addition, the selective activation of PKCδ by DPhT was inhibited in cells that overexpressed cytosolic TrxR1. Furthermore, rottlerin, a selective inhibitor of PKCδ, and PKCδ siRNA (small interfering RNA), suppressed the morphological changes induced by DPhT in the control cells. Conclusions. The overexpression of TrxR1 inhibits migration of HEK‐293 cells stimulated with PMA and DPhT. Moreover, our observations suggest that this effect is mediated by the inhibition of PKCδ activation.     

硫氧还蛋白还原酶1(TrxR1)在胃癌中的表达及对胃癌细胞生长的影响

目的:探讨胃癌组织硫氧还蛋白还原酶1(TrxR1)表达与生存时间的关系及其对胃癌细胞生长的影响。方法:用Real-time PCR法检测76例胃癌组织及癌旁TrxR1 mRNA表达,并分析其与胃癌患者临床病理特征及预后的关系;随机选取3例胃癌组织及癌旁组织,采用免疫组化法、Western blot法检测TrxR1蛋白表达。采用Western blot法和Real-time PCR法检测胃癌细胞系及人胃粘膜上皮细胞中TrxR1的表达。采用小RNA干扰序列(siRNA)处理AGS细胞,根据处理方法不同将AGS细胞分为3组:阴性对照组:转染NC-siRNA、TRXR1 siRNA干扰1组:转染TRXR1-siRNA1、TRXR1 siRNA干扰2组:转染TRXR1-siRNA2。使用Real-time PCR法检测各组AGS细胞中TrxR1 mRNA的表达,克隆形成试验和MTT法检测AGS细胞生长情况。结果:胃癌组织中TrxR1 mRNA和蛋白表达量均显著性上调,TrxR1主要定位于细胞质中。TrxR1高表达与患者TNM分期及淋巴结转移有关,且TrxR1高表达组患者的中位生存时间短于低表达组...     

Targeting HMGB1 inhibits ovarian cancer growth and metastasis by lentivirus-mediated RNA interference

High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a nuclear and extracellular protein, is implicated in the development and progression of some types of cancers. However, no information is available to date regarding the function of HMGB1 in ovarian cancer. In this study, we performed cDNA microarray analysis and identified HMGB1 as a gene dramatically elevated in the highly invasive subclone S1 compared with the low invasive subclone S21 derived from the same cell line SKOV3. Then lentivirus vector with HMGB1 shRNA was constructed and infected the highly invasive cell line S1, A1, and HO8910PM. Real-time RT-PCR, Western blot, and IHC results confirmed the down-regulation of HMGB1 expression by its shRNA was about 80-90% at both the mRNA and protein levels. Knockdown of HMGB1 significantly suppressed ovarian cancer cell proliferation and induced cell cycle arrest at the G1/G0 phase, which was accompanied by decreased expressions of cyclin D1 and PCNA. Furthermore, knockdown of HMGB1 induced ovarian cancer cell apoptosis, which was mediated by increased expression of Bax and decreased expression of Bcl-2. Finally, knockdown of HMGB1 significantly inhibited ovarian cancer cell invasion and metastasis, which was regulated by decreased expressions of MMP2 and MMP9. Serum HMGB1 levels in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were significantly higher than that in patients with benign ovarian tumor and healthy controls. These results indicate that HMGB1 is a newly identified gene associated with ovarian cancer growth and metastasis. HMGB1 may serve as a new therapeutic target for the treatment of ovarian cancer in the future.     

Targeting LIMK1 with luteolin inhibits the growth of lung cancer in vitro and in vivo

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. LIM domain kinase (LIMK) 1 is a member of serine/threonine kinase family and highly expressed in various cancers. Luteolin, a polyphenolic plant flavonoid, has been reported to suppress tumour proliferation through inducing apoptosis and autophagy via MAPK activation in glioma. However, the mechanism of luteolin on suppressing lung cancer growth is still unclear. We found that luteolin targeted LIMK1 from the in silico screening and significantly inhibited the LIMK1 kinase activity, which was confirmed with pull-down binding assay and computational docking models. Treatment with luteolin inhibited lung cancer cells anchorage-independent colony growth and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at G1 phase. Luteolin also decreased the expression of cyclin D1 and increased the levels of cleaved caspase-3 by down-regulating LIMK1 signalling related targets, including p-LIMK and p-cofilin. Furthermore, luteolin suppressed the lung cancer patient-derived xenograft tumour growth by decreasing Ki-67, p-LIMK and p-cofilin expression in vivo. Taken together, these results provide insight into the mechanism that underlies the anticancer effects of luteolin on lung cancer, which involved in down-regulation of LIMK1 and its interaction with cofilin. It also provides valuable evidence for translation towards lung cancer clinical trials with luteolin.     

Inhibition of thioredoxin reductase by auranofin induces apoptosis in cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells

Cisplatin is an effective antitumor agent for the treatment of several carcinomas. However, the development of resistance to cisplatin represents a serious clinical problem. The effects of auranofin, a gold(I) compound clinically used as an antirheumatic agent, on cisplatin-sensitive (2008) and-resistant (C13*) cancer cells were studied. Auranofin is more effective than cisplatin in decreasing cell viability and its action is particularly marked in C13* cells, indicating that no cross-resistance occurs. Furthermore, auranofin is able to permeate C13* cells more efficiently than 2008 cells. Treatment with auranofin determines a consistent release of cytochrome c in both cell lines, while cisplatin is effective only in sensitive cells. Both auranofin and cisplatin induce apoptosis in 2008 cells, while in C13* cells only auranofin is effective. Apoptosis is accompanied by an increased production of hydrogen peroxide that, however, is inhibited by N-acetyl-L-cysteine. In resistant cells, H(2)O(2) production is counteracted by a large overexpression of thioredoxin reductase that constitutes the preferred target of the inhibitory action of auranofin. This specific effect of auranofin might rationalize its ability in overcoming cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells.     

APR-246/PRIMA-1MET inhibits thioredoxin reductase 1 and converts the enzyme to a dedicated NADPH oxidase

The low-molecular-weight compound APR-246 (PRIMA-1^MET) restores wild-type conformation and function to mutant p53, and triggers apoptosis in tumor cells. We show here that APR-246 also targets the selenoprotein thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1), a key regulator of cellular redox balance. APR-246 inhibited both recombinant TrxR1 in vitro and TrxR1 in cells. A Sec-to-Cys mutant of TrxR1 was not inhibited by APR-246, suggesting targeting of the selenocysteine residue in wild-type TrxR1. Preheated APR-246 and its conversion product methylene quinuclidinone (MQ) were much more efficient TrxR1 inhibitors than APR-246 itself, indicating that MQ is the active compound responsible for TrxR1 enzyme inhibition. TrxR1 inhibited by MQ was still functional as a pro-oxidant NADPH oxidase. Knockdown of TrxR1 caused a partial and reproducible attenuation of APR-246-induced tumor cell death independently of p53 status. Cellular TrxR1 activity was also inhibited by APR-246 irrespective of p53 status. We show that APR-246 can directly affect cellular redox status via targeting of TrxR1. Our findings provide an explanation for the previously observed effects of APR-246 on tumor cells lacking mutant p53.     

Identification and characterization of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase from Aeropyrum pernix K1.

We have identified and characterized a thermostable thioredoxin system in the aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon Aeropyrum pernix K1. The gene (Accession no. APE0641) of A. pernix encoding a 37 kDa protein contains a redox active site motif (CPHC) but its N-terminal extension region (about 200 residues) shows no homology within the genome database. A second gene (Accession no. APE1061) has high homology to thioredoxin reductase and encodes a 37 kDa protein with the active site motif (CSVC), and binding sites for FAD and NADPH. We cloned the two genes and expressed both proteins in E. coli. It was observed that the recombinant proteins could act as an NADPH-dependent protein disulfide reductase system in the insulin reduction. In addition, the APE0641 protein and thioredoxin reductase from E. coli could also catalyze the disulfide reduction. These indicated that APE1061 and APE0641 express thioredoxin (ApTrx) and thioredoxin reductase (ApTR) of A. pernix, respectively. ApTR is expressed as an active homodimeric flavoprotein in the E. coli system. The optimum temperature was above 90 degrees C, and the half-life of heat inactivation was about 4 min at 110 degrees C. The heat stability of ApTR was enhanced in the presence of excess FAD. ApTR could reduce both thioredoxins from A. pernix and E. coli and showed a similar molar specific activity for both proteins. The standard state redox potential of ApTrx was about -262 mV, which was slightly higher than that of Trx from E. coli (-270 mV). These results indicate that a lower redox potential of thioredoxin is not necessary for keeping catalytic disulfide bonds reduced and thereby coping with oxidative stress in an aerobic hyperthermophilic archaea. Furthermore, the thioredoxin system of aerobic hyperthermophilic archaea is biochemically close to that of the bacteria.     

Ultrastructural demonstration of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase in rat hepatocytes

Electron microscopic immunocytochemistry, in conjunction with the immunogold technique, was used to demonstrate the ultrastructural localization of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase in rat liver hepatocytes. Gold particles representing thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase antigenic sites were found throughout the cell, but particularly densely associated with the granular endoplasmic reticulum and the cisternae of the Golgi complex. Label was also distributed over the cytosol and in the chromatin of the nucleus. We conclude that thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase are present in several different cellular compartments including the nucleus. In particular, the enrichment of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase to the endoplasmic reticulum is consistent with functions in protein processing, secretion and the formation of nascent protein disulfides.     

Immunohistochemical localization of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase in adult rats

Rabbit antisera against homogeneous rat liver thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase (NADPH-oxidized thioredoxin oxidoreductase, E.C. 1.6.4.5) were prepared and used for immunohistochemical analysis in adult rats. Immunoreactive thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase were widely distributed in tissues and organs, but varied a lot between cell types. Generally, epithelial cells, neuronal cells and secretory cells, both exocrine and endocrine, showed high immunoreactivity whereas mesenchymal cells with exceptions showed low activity. Surface lining epithelial and keratinizing cells showed high activity. The immunofluorescence was localized in the cytoplasm of cells with enrichments at secretory granules, at the plasma membrane or in the subplasma membrane zone. Variations in secretory cells were seen related to feeding and starvation and to metabolic activity. The distribution of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase is compatible with function in thiol-disulfide interchange reaction related to protein synthesis, intracellular transport and different forms of secretion.     

Oxidation of structural cysteine residues in thioredoxin 1 by aromatic arsenicals enhances cancer cell cytotoxicity caused by the inhibition of thioredoxin reductase 1

Thioredoxin systems, composed of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), thioredoxin (Trx) and NADPH, play important roles in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis and redox signaling. Recently the cytosolic Trx1 system has been shown to be a cellular target of arsenic containing compounds. To elucidate the relationship of the structure of arsenic compounds with their ability of inhibiting TrxR1 and Trx1, and cytotoxicity, we have investigated the reaction of Trx1 system with seven arsenic trithiolates: As(Cys)₃, As(GS)₃, As(Penicillamine)₃, As(Mercaptoethanesulfonate)₃, As(Mercaptopurine)₃, As(2-mercaptopyridine)₃ and As(2-mercaptopyridine N-oxide)₃. The cytotoxicity of these arsenicals was consistent with their ability to inhibit TrxR1 in vitro and in cells. Unlike other arsenicals, As(Mercaptopurine)₃ which did not show inhibitory effects on TrxR1 had very weak cytotoxicity, indicating that TrxR1 is a reliable drug target for arsenicals. Moreover, the two aromatic compounds As(2-mercaptopyridine)₃ and As(2-mercaptopyridine N-oxide)₃ showed stronger cytotoxicity than the others. As(2-mercaptopyridine)₃ which selectively oxidized two structural cysteines (Cys62 and Cys69) in Trx1 showed mild improvement in cytotoxicity. As(2-mercaptopyridine N-oxide)₃ oxidized all the Cys residues in Trx1, exhibiting the strongest cytotoxicity. Oxidation of Trx1 by As(2-mercaptopyridine)₃ and As(2-mercaptopyridine N-oxide)₃ affected electron transfer from NADPH and TrxR1 to peroxiredoxin 1 (Prx1), which could result in the reactive oxygen species elevation and trigger cell death process. These results suggest that oxidation of structural cysteine residues in Trx1 by aromatic group in TrxR1-targeting drugs may sensitize tumor cells to cell death, providing a novel approach to regulate cellular redox signaling and also a basis for rational design of new anticancer agents.     

Targeting proapoptotic protein BAD inhibits survival and self-renewal of cancer stem cells

Emerging evidence suggests that the resistance of cancer stem cells (CSC) to many conventional therapies is one of the major limiting factors of cancer therapy efficacy. Identification of mechanisms responsible for survival and self-renewal of CSC will help design new therapeutic strategies that target and eliminate both differentiated cancer cells and CSC. Here we demonstrated the potential role of proapoptotic protein BAD in the biology of CSC in melanoma, prostate and breast cancers. We enriched CD44⁺/CD24⁻ cells (CSC) by tumorosphere formation and purified this population by FACS. Both spheres and CSC exhibited increased potential for proliferation, migration, invasion, sphere formation, anchorage-independent growth, as well as upregulation of several stem cell-associated markers. We showed that the phosphorylation of BAD is essential for the survival of CSC. Conversely, ectopic expression of a phosphorylation-deficient mutant BAD induced apoptosis in CSC. This effect was enhanced by treatment with a BH3-mimetic, ABT-737. Both pharmacological agents that inhibit survival kinases and growth factors that are involved in drug resistance delivered their respective cytotoxic and protective effects by modulating the BAD phosphorylation in CSC. Furthermore, the frequency and self-renewal capacity of CSC was significantly reduced by knocking down the BAD expression. Consistent with our in vitro results, significant phosphorylation of BAD was found in CD44⁺ CSC of 83% breast tumor specimens. In addition, we also identified a positive correlation between BAD expression and disease stage in prostate cancer, suggesting a role of BAD in tumor advancement. Our studies unveil the role of BAD in the survival and self-renewal of CSC and propose BAD not only as an attractive target for cancer therapy but also as a marker of tumor progression.Although tumors initially respond positively to anti-cancer agents, several cancers, despite the best care and significant improvements in treatment, recur and progress to advanced stages of the disease. The mechanisms underlying this recurrence and metastasis are not clearly understood. Over the past decade, substantial evidence supported the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis as a viable explanation for the initiation, progression and recurrence of cancer. According to this hypothesis, each tumor harbors a small subpopulation of specialized cells among cellular heterogeneity, known as CSC. These cells exhibit self-renewal property that drives tumorigenesis and plasticity to differentiate into multiple cell types contributing to tumor cellular heterogeneity. Support for this hypothesis came from the studies by Lapidot et al. who identified tumor-initiating cells in acute myeloid leukemia.^{1, 2} Subsequently, CSCs have been identified in several cancers.^{3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}Accumulating evidence suggests that current cancer therapies can only shrink tumors as they target and kill the differentiated cancer (DC) cells, but are unable to target the rare CSC population.^{11, 12} Thus, despite a wealth of information on DC cells, the active survival and self-renewal pathways in CSCs have not been characterized thoroughly. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the survival, self-renewal and resistance of CSCs to current therapeutic regimens is of immense clinical interest. This information will help in developing novel strategies for more effective treatments for cancer.Most anti-cancer drugs exert their effects through triggering the apoptotic pathways. However, malignant cancer cells can escape apoptosis by altering the expression level of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic BCL-2 family members. Considering the potential role of BCL-2 family members in tumorigenesis and cancer cell survival, their role in CSC biology has been increasingly studied.^{13, 14} BAD (BCL2-antagonist of cell death) is a member of the BH3-only BCL-2 family protein that when dephosphorylated promotes apoptosis by heterodimerizing with the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-XL and BCL-2.¹⁵ The cytotoxic effects of BAD are controlled by mechanisms that regulate its phosphorylation on at least two distinct serine residues, S112 and S136.^{16, 17, 18} Previously, we showed that phosphorylation at either site is sufficient to protect prostate cancer cells from apoptosis.^{19, 20, 21} We also showed that BAD promotes prostate tumor growth in mouse models.²² Clinically, while BAD expression was associated with relapse in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients,^{23, 24} phospho-BAD expression was associated with cisplatin resistance and poor overall survival in ovarian cancer.²⁵Our previous findings along with other reports showing the role of BAD in the apoptosis modulation and growth of DC cells^{19, 22, 26} prompted us to explore the potential role of BAD in the biology of CSCs. We started our investigation by assessing the role of BAD in survival and self-renewal of CSCs. As we observed a significant role for BAD in CSC''s biology, we extended our work to assess the BAD phosphorylation in CSCs of breast cancer patient tumors and for a potential correlation between BAD expression and disease progression in prostate cancer.     

Targeting OGG1 arrests cancer cell proliferation by inducing replication stress

Altered oncogene expression in cancer cells causes loss of redox homeostasis resulting in oxidative DNA damage, e.g. 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), repaired by base excision repair (BER). PARP1 coordinates BER and relies on the upstream 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) to recognise and excise 8-oxoG. Here we hypothesize that OGG1 may represent an attractive target to exploit reactive oxygen species (ROS) elevation in cancer. Although OGG1 depletion is well tolerated in non-transformed cells, we report here that OGG1 depletion obstructs A3 T-cell lymphoblastic acute leukemia growth in vitro and in vivo, validating OGG1 as a potential anti-cancer target. In line with this hypothesis, we show that OGG1 inhibitors (OGG1i) target a wide range of cancer cells, with a favourable therapeutic index compared to non-transformed cells. Mechanistically, OGG1i and shRNA depletion cause S-phase DNA damage, replication stress and proliferation arrest or cell death, representing a novel mechanistic approach to target cancer. This study adds OGG1 to the list of BER factors, e.g. PARP1, as potential targets for cancer treatment.     

DNA replication defects in a mutant deficient in the thioredoxin homolog YbbN

Escherichia coli contains two thioredoxins, Trx1 and Trx2, and a thioredoxin-like protein, YbbN, that displays both redox and chaperone properties. Since three out of the six proteins of the YbbN interactome (Butland et al., 2005) are components of DNA polymerase 3 holoenzyme (i.e. the β-clamp DnaN, the θ subunit HolE and the δ′ subunit HolB), we investigated whether the ybbN mutant presents DNA replication defects. We found that this mutant incorporates ³H-thymidine at higher rates than the parental strain and displays overinitiation, hypermutator and filamentation phenotypes with the occurrence of anucleated cells. Moreover, YbbN functions as a bona fide chaperone in the refolding of the urea-unfolded β-clamp. These results suggest that the DNA replication and cell division defects of the ybbN mutant might best be explained by chaperone functions of YbbN in the biogenesis of DNA polymerase 3 holoenzyme.     

Effect of thioredoxin reductase 1 on glucocorticoid receptor activity in human outer root sheath cells

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common disease of patchy hair loss on the scalp that can progress to cover the entire scalp and eventually the entire body. Intralesional injection of corticosteroids is the first-line therapy for adult patients, however some patients do not respond to glucocorticoid treatment effectively. To delineate the molecular mechanism underlying glucocorticoid insensitivity, we examined the expression of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1). In some case of glucocorticoid-resistant AA patients, the expression of TrxR1 was decreased in outer root sheath (ORS). We then investigated the effect of TrxR1 on GR activity using recombinant adenoviruses. Overexpression of TrxR1 markedly increased GR activity in ORS cells cultured in vitro. In addition, TrxR1 protected GR activity against H(2)O(2). Finally, TrxR1-enhanced GR activity was significantly inhibited by the overexpression of dominant negative form of Trx (Trx(C32S/C35S)). These results suggest that decreased TrxR1 may be one putative cause for glucocorticoid resistance in AA, through the impact on intracellular redox system.