Combined antimalarial therapy using artemisinin

The existing armamentarium of drugs for the treatment and prevention of malaria is limited primarily by resistance (and cross-resistance between closely related drugs). However, most of these drugs still have a place and their life-span could be prolonged if better deployed and used, and also by rationally combining them based on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Newer compounds are also being developed. The nature of malaria disease and its prevalence in the developing world call for innovative approaches to develop new affordable drugs and to safeguard the available ones. According to WHO, the concept of combination therapy is based on the synergistic or additive potential of two or more drugs, to improve therapeutic efficacy and also delay the development of resistance to the individual components of the combination. Combination therapy (CT) with antimalarial drugs is the simultaneous use of two or more blood schizontocidal drugs with independent modes of action and different biochemical targets in the parasite. In the context of this definition, multiple-drug therapies that include a nonantimalarial drug to enhance the antimalarial effect of a blood schizontocidal drug are not considered combination therapy. Similarly, certain antimalarial drugs that fit the criteria of synergistic fixed-dose combinations are operationally considered as single products in that neither of the individual components would be given alone for anti-malarial therapy. An example is sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Artemisinin-based combination therapies have been shown to improve treatment efficacy and also contain drug resistance in South-East Asia. However, major challenges exist in the deployment and use of antimalarial drug combination therapies, particularly in Africa. These include: 1) the choice of drug combinations best suited for the different epidemiological situations; 2) the cost of combination therapy; 3) the timing of the introduction of combination therapy; 4) the operational obstacles to implementation, especially compliance. As a response to increasing levels of antimalarial resistance, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that all countries experiencing resistance to conventional monotherapies, such as chloroquine, amodiaquine or sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, should use combination therapies, preferably those containing artemisinin derivatives (ACTs--artemisinin-based combination therapies) for malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum. There is a promising role of such compounds in replacing or complementing current options. Since 1979, several different formulations of artemisinin and its derivatives have been produced and studied in China in several thousand patients for either P. falciparum or P. vivax malaria. To date, there is no evidence of drug resistance to these compounds. The use of artemisinin, artemether, arteether and artesunate for either uncomplicated or severe malaria is now spreading through almost all malarious areas of the world, although some of they have no patent protection, their development (with few exceptions) has not followed yet full international standards. Both artesunate, artemether and arteether are rapidly and extensively converted to their common bioactive metabolite, dihydroarte-misinin. WHO currently recommends the following therapeutic options: 1) artemether/lumefantrine; 2) artesunate plus amodiaquine; 3) artesunate plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (in areas where SP efficacy remains high); 4) artesunate plus mefloquine (in areas with low to moderate transmission); and 5) amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, in areas where efficacy of both amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine remains high (mainly limited to countries in West Africa). This non artemisinin-based combination therapy is reserved as an interim option for countries, which, for whatever reason, are unable immediately to move to ACTs.     

Re-evaluation of how artemisinins work in light of emerging evidence of in vitro resistance

There are more than half a billion cases of malaria every year. Combinations of an artemisinin with other antimalarial drugs are now recommended treatments for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in most endemic areas. These treatment regimens act rapidly to relieve symptoms and effect cure. There is considerable controversy on how artemisinins work and over emerging indications of resistance to this class of antimalarial drugs. Several individual molecules have been proposed as targets for artemisinins, in addition to the idea that artemisinins might have many targets at the same time. Our suggestion that artemisinins inhibit the parasite-encoded sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase (SERCA) PfATP6 has gained support from recent observations that a polymorphism in the gene encoding PfATP6 is associated with in vitro resistance to artemether in field isolates of P. falciparum.     

Simplified antimalarial therapeutic monitoring: using the day-7 drug level?

The blood concentration profiles of most antimalarial drugs vary considerably between patients. The interpretation of antimalarial drug trials evaluating efficacy and effectiveness would be improved considerably if the exposure of the infecting parasite population to the antimalarial drug treatment could be measured. Artemisinin combination treatments are now recommended as first-line drugs for the treatment of falciparum malaria. Measurement of the blood, serum or plasma concentration of the slowly eliminated partner antimalarial drug on day 7 of follow-up is simpler and might be a better determinant of therapeutic response than the area under the concentration-time curve. Measurement of the day-7 drug level should be considered as a routine part of antimalarial drug trials.     

Efficacy of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in the treatment of malaria not complicated by Plasmodium falciparum in Nariño,Colombia, 1999-2002

The resurgence and spread of antimalarial drug resistance is one of the causes of the worldwide increase of malaria. In Colombia, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria has been treated with a combination of amodiaquine (AQ) and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) since 2000. The efficacy of these two antimalarials was evaluated after the implementation of the new malaria treatment scheme. In the municipalities of El Charco and Tumaco (Nari?o) on the Pacific Coast region, the standard PAHO protocol was used to evaluate antimalarial efficacy in areas of low to moderate malaria transmission. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment regime in two cities of Nari?o, El Charco (n = 48) and Tumaco (n = 50). After 14 days none of El Charco patients presented therapeutic failure to either antimalarial. However, in Tumaco after 28 days, 12 of 24 (95% CI: 30.6-69.4) patients presented AQ treatment failure while 4 of 26 (95% CI: 5.1-33.1) patients had SP treatment failure. The high level of AQ treatment failure in Tumaco was unexpected because it had been introduced only recently as an antimalarial treatment in Colombia. The results suggest that the use of the current dose of AQ in combination with SP will be therapeutically useful for less time than expected. Use of combined therapies is a key strategy to delay antimalarial resistance. Unfortunately, its success depends on the efficacy of antimalarial drugs individually.     

Antimalarial dosing regimens and drug resistance

The contribution of underdosing to antimalarial treatment failure has been underappreciated. Most recommended dosage regimens are based on studies in non-pregnant adult patients. Young children and pregnant women, who bear the heaviest malaria burden, have the highest treatment failure rates. This has been attributed previously to lower immunity, although blood concentrations of many antimalarial drugs are significantly lower in pregnant women and young children than in non-pregnant adults. Nevertheless, there have been no studies of higher dosages. Sub-therapeutic concentrations will certainly contribute to poorer responses to treatment and will fuel the emergence and spread of antimalarial drug resistance. There is an urgent need for studies to optimise antimalarial dosage regimens in infants, young children and pregnant women, both to improve cure rates and to prolong the useful therapeutic lives of antimalarial drugs.     

Drug-resistant malaria - an insight

Despite intensive research extending back to the 1930s, when the first synthetic antimalarial drugs made their appearance, the repertoire of clinically licensed formulations remains very limited. Moreover, widespread and increasing resistance to these drugs contributes enormously to the difficulties in controlling malaria, posing considerable intellectual, technical and humanitarian challenges. A detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to these agents is emerging that should permit new drugs to be rationally developed and older ones to be engineered to regain their efficacy. This review summarizes recent progress in analysing the causes of resistance to the major antimalarial drugs and its spread.     

Novel polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum ABC transporter genes are associated with major ACT antimalarial drug resistance

Chemotherapy is a critical component of malaria control. However, the most deadly malaria pathogen, Plasmodium falciparum, has repeatedly mounted resistance against a series of antimalarial drugs used in the last decades. Southeast Asia is an epicenter of emerging antimalarial drug resistance, including recent resistance to the artemisinins, the core component of all recommended antimalarial combination therapies. Alterations in the parasitic membrane proteins Pgh-1, PfCRT and PfMRP1 are believed to be major contributors to resistance through decreasing intracellular drug accumulation. The pfcrt, pfmdr1 and pfmrp1 genes were sequenced from a set of P.falciparum field isolates from the Thai-Myanmar border. In vitro drug susceptibility to artemisinin, dihydroartemisinin, mefloquine and lumefantrine were assessed. Positive correlations were seen between the in vitro susceptibility responses to artemisinin and dihydroartemisinin and the responses to the arylamino-alcohol quinolines lumefantrine and mefloquine. The previously unstudied pfmdr1 F1226Y and pfmrp1 F1390I SNPs were associated significantly with artemisinin, mefloquine and lumefantrine in vitro susceptibility. A variation in pfmdr1 gene copy number was also associated with parasite drug susceptibility of artemisinin, mefloquine and lumefantrine. Our work unveils new candidate markers of P. falciparum multidrug resistance in vitro, while contributing to the understanding of subjacent genetic complexity, essential for future evidence-based drug policy decisions.     

Artemisinin-Ginkgo biloba extract combination therapy for Plasmodium yoelii

Malaria remains a widespread life-threatening infectious disease, leading to an estimated 219 million cases and around 435,000 deaths. After an unprecedented success, the antimalarial progress is at a standstill. Therefore, new methods are urgently needed to decrease drug resistant and enhance antimalarial efficacy. According to the alteration of erythrocyte biomechanical properties and the immune evasion mechanism of parasites, drugs, which can improve blood circulation, can be chosen to combine with antimalarial drugs for malaria treatment. Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE), one of drug for vascular disease, was used to combine with artemisinin for Plasmodium yoelii therapy. Artemisinin-GBE combination therapy (AGCT) demonstrated remarkable antimalarial efficacy by decreasing infection rate, improving blood microcirculation and modulating immune system. Besides, the expression of invasion related genes, such as AMA1, MSP1 and Py01365, can be suppressed by AGCT, hindering invasion process of merozoites. This new antimalarial strategy, combining antimalarial drugs with drugs that improve blood circulation, may enhance the antimalarial efficacy and ameliorate restoration ability, proving a potential method for finding ideal compatible drugs to improve malaria therapy     

Drug-resistant malaria: molecular mechanisms and implications for public health

Resistance to antimalarial drugs has often threatened malaria elimination efforts and historically has led to the short-term resurgence of malaria incidences and deaths. With concentrated malaria eradication efforts currently underway, monitoring drug resistance in clinical settings complemented by in vitro drug susceptibility assays and analysis of resistance markers, becomes critical to the implementation of an effective antimalarial drug policy. Understanding of the factors, which lead to the development and spread of drug resistance, is necessary to design optimal prevention and treatment strategies. This review attempts to summarize the unique factors presented by malarial parasites that lead to the emergence and spread of drug resistance, and gives an overview of known resistance mechanisms to currently used antimalarial drugs.     

Helicases - feasible antimalarial drug target for Plasmodium falciparum

Of the four Plasmodium species that cause human malaria, Plasmodium falciparum is responsible for the most severe form of the disease and this parasite is developing resistance to the major antimalarial drugs. Therefore, in order to control malaria it is necessary to identify new drug targets. One feasible target might be helicases, which are important unwinding enzymes and required for almost all the nucleic acid metabolism in the malaria parasite.     

Plasmodium vivax malaria elimination: should innovative ideas from the past be revisited?

In the 1950s, the strategy of adding chloroquine to food salt as a prophylaxis against malaria was considered to be a successful tool. However, with the development of Plasmodium resistance in the Brazilian Amazon, this control strategy was abandoned. More than 50 years later, asexual stage resistance can be avoided by screening for antimalarial drugs that have a selective action against gametocytes, thus old prophylactic measures can be revisited. The efficacy of the old methods should be tested as complementary tools for the elimination of malaria.     

On the contribution of the rodent model Plasmodium chabaudi for understanding the genetics of drug resistance in malaria

Malaria is a devastating disease that still claims over half a million lives every year, mostly in sub–Saharan Africa. One of the main barriers to malaria control is the evolution and propagation of drug-resistant mutant parasites. Knowing the genes and respective mutations responsible for drug resistance facilitates the design of drugs with novel modes of action and allows predicting and monitoring drug resistance in natural parasite populations in real-time. The best way to identify these mutations is to experimentally evolve resistance to the drug in question and then comparing the genomes of the drug-resistant mutants to that of the sensitive progenitor parasites. This simple evolutive concept was the starting point for the development of a paradigm over the years, based on the use of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi to unravel the genetics of drug resistance in malaria. It involves the use of a cloned parasite isolate (P. chabaudi AS) whose genome is well characterized, to artificially select resistance to given drugs through serial passages in mice under slowly increasing drug pressure. The end resulting parasites are cloned and the genetic mutations are then discovered through Linkage Group Selection, a technique conceived by Prof. Richard Carter and his group, and/or Whole Genome Sequencing. The precise role of these mutations can then be interrogated in malaria parasites of humans through allelic replacement experiments and/or genotype-phenotype association studies in natural parasite populations. Using this paradigm, all the mutations underlying resistance to the most important antimalarial drugs were identified, most of which were pioneering and later shown to also play a role in drug resistance in natural infections of human malaria parasites. This supports the use of P. chabaudi a fast-track predictive model to identify candidate genetic markers of resistance to present and future antimalarial drugs and improving our understanding of the biology of resistance.     

Plant Derived Antimalarial Agents: New Leads and Challenges

New treatments for malaria are urgently needed due to the increasing problem of drug-resistance in malaria parasites. The long-established use of quinine and the more recent introduction of artemisinin and its derivatives as highly effective antimalarials demonstrates that plant species are an important resource for the discovery of new antimalarial agents. Furthermore, many plant species continue to be used in traditional medicines for the treatment of malaria and many people depend on such remedies as they cannot afford and/or do not have access to effective antimalarial drugs. In this paper the potential of plant species to yield new leads to antimalarial drugs will be illustrated with reference to cryptolepine, the main alkaloid present in the species, Cryptolepis sanguinolenta. In addition to this approach, there is currently increasing interest in the use and development of traditional herbal remedies for the treatment of malaria as these may have the potential to provide affordable antimalarial treatment for many who cannot afford the drugs needed to treat chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections. However, little is known with respect to the efficacy and safety of traditional antimalarials and clinical studies are urgently needed to establish their value. Some of the issues pertinent to this area will be briefly reviewed and it is hoped that this will stimulate further discussion and research on this important topic.     

P. falciparum in vitro killing rates allow to discriminate between different antimalarial mode-of-action

Chemotherapy is still the cornerstone for malaria control. Developing drugs against Plasmodium parasites and monitoring their efficacy requires methods to accurately determine the parasite killing rate in response to treatment. Commonly used techniques essentially measure metabolic activity as a proxy for parasite viability. However, these approaches are susceptible to artefacts, as viability and metabolism are two parameters that are coupled during the parasite life cycle but can be differentially affected in response to drug actions. Moreover, traditional techniques do not allow to measure the speed-of-action of compounds on parasite viability, which is an essential efficacy determinant. We present here a comprehensive methodology to measure in vitro the direct effect of antimalarial compounds over the parasite viability, which is based on limiting serial dilution of treated parasites and re-growth monitoring. This methodology allows to precisely determine the killing rate of antimalarial compounds, which can be quantified by the parasite reduction ratio and parasite clearance time, which are key mode-of-action parameters. Importantly, we demonstrate that this technique readily permits to determine compound killing activities that might be otherwise missed by traditional, metabolism-based techniques. The analysis of a large set of antimalarial drugs reveals that this viability-based assay allows to discriminate compounds based on their antimalarial mode-of-action. This approach has been adapted to perform medium throughput screening, facilitating the identification of fast-acting antimalarial compounds, which are crucially needed for the control and possibly the eradication of malaria.     

Antimalarial chemotherapy: young guns or back to the future?

The burgeoning global problem of malaria is largely due to the emergence of parasite resistance to our limited armamentarium of antimalarial drugs. The recognition of this impending disaster at the international level and the engagement of the pharmaceutical industry promise a more optimistic future for antimalarial drug development. This is particularly exciting when considering the advances in our understanding of parasite biology, which are currently being fuelled by the malaria genome project. This article discusses recent developments in the area of antimalarial drug discovery and evaluation. New advances, based on traditional antimalarial drug classes including the quinolines, peroxides and antifolates (‘back to the future’), are discussed, followed by a presentation of some novel targets (‘young guns’) that have been shown to be good candidates for chemotherapeutic attack.     

Sentinel network for monitoring in vitro susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs in Colombia: a proof of concept

Drug resistance is one of the principal obstacles blocking worldwide malaria control. In Colombia, malaria remains a major public health concern and drug-resistant parasites have been reported. In vitro drug susceptibility assays are a useful tool for monitoring the emergence and spread of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The present study was conducted as a proof of concept for an antimalarial drug resistance surveillance network based on in vitro susceptibility testing in Colombia. Sentinel laboratories were set up in three malaria endemic areas. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay-histidine rich protein 2 and schizont maturation methods were used to assess the susceptibility of fresh P. falciparum isolates to six antimalarial drugs. This study demonstrates that an antimalarial drug resistance surveillance network based on in vitro methods is feasible in the field with the participation of a research institute, local health institutions and universities. It could also serve as a model for a regional surveillance network. Preliminary susceptibility results showed widespread chloroquine resistance, which was consistent with previous reports for the Pacific region. However, high susceptibility to dihydroartemisinin and lumefantrine compounds, currently used for treatment in the country, was also reported. The implementation process identified critical points and opportunities for the improvement of network sustainability strategies.     

Why do we need to know more about mixed Plasmodium species infections in humans?

Four Plasmodium species cause malaria in humans. Most malaria-endemic regions feature mixed infections involving two or more of these species. Factors contributing to heterogeneous parasite species and disease distribution include differences in genetic polymorphisms underlying parasite drug resistance and host susceptibility, mosquito vector ecology and transmission seasonality. It is suggested that unknown factors limit mixed Plasmodium species infections, and that mixed-species infections protect against severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Careful examination of methods used to detect these parasites and interpretation of individual- and population-based data are necessary to understand the influence of mixed Plasmodium species infections on malarial disease. This should ensure that deployment of future antimalarial vaccines and drugs will be conducted in a safe and timely manner.     

Drug discovery for malaria: a very challenging and timely endeavor

The prevalence of resistance to known antimalarial drugs has resulted in the expansion of antimalarial drug discovery efforts. Academic and nonprofit institutions are partnering with the pharmaceutical industry to develop new antimalarial drugs. Several new antimalarial agents are undergoing clinical trials, mainly those resurrected from previous antimalarial drug discovery programs. Novel antimalarials are being advanced through the drug development process, of course, with the anticipated high failure rate typical of drug discovery. Many of these are summarized in this review. Mechanisms for funding antimalarial drug discovery and genomic information to aid drug target selection have never been better. It remains to be seen whether ongoing efforts will be sufficient for reducing malaria burden in the developing world.     

Antimalarial activity of the anticancer and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and its analog ZL<Subscript>3</Subscript>B

Background  

The high rate of mortality due to malaria and the worldwide distribution of parasite resistance to the commonly used antimalarial drugs chloroquine and pyrimethamine emphasize the urgent need for the development of new antimalarial drugs. An alternative approach to the long and uncertain process of designing and developing new compounds is to identify among the armamentarium of drugs already approved for clinical treatment of various human diseases those that may have strong antimalarial activity.     

Transporters as mediators of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

Drug resistance represents a major obstacle in the radical control of malaria. Drug resistance can arise in many different ways, but recent developments highlight the importance of mutations in transporter molecules as being major contributors to drug resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. While approximately 2.5% of the P. falciparum genome encodes membrane transporters, this review concentrates on three transporters, namely the chloroquine resistance transporter PfCRT, the multi-drug resistance transporter 1 PfMDR1, and the multi-drug resistance-associated protein PfMRP, which have been strongly associated with resistance to the major antimalarial drugs. The studies that identified these entities as contributors to resistance, and the possible molecular mechanisms that can bring about this phenotype, are discussed. A deep understanding of the underpinning mechanisms, and of the structural specificities of the players themselves, is a necessary basis for the development of the new drugs that will be needed for the future armamentarium against malaria.