Pathological replication in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase

Little is known about what happens when forks meet to complete DNA replication in any organism. In this study we present data suggesting that the collision of replication forks is a potential threat to genomic stability. We demonstrate that Escherichia coli cells lacking RecG helicase suffer major defects in chromosome replication following UV irradiation, and that this is associated with high levels of DNA synthesis initiated independently of the initiator protein DnaA. This UV-induced stable DNA replication is dependent on PriA helicase and continues long after UV-induced lesions have been excised. We suggest UV irradiation triggers the assembly of new replication forks, leading to multiple fork collisions outside the terminus area. Such collisions may generate branched DNAs that serve to establish further new forks, resulting in uncontrolled DNA amplification. We propose that RecG reduces the likelihood of this pathological cascade being set in motion by reducing initiation of replication at D- and R-loops, and other structures generated as a result of fork collisions. Our results shed light on why replication initiation in bacteria is limited to a single origin and why termination is carefully orchestrated to a single event within a restricted area each cell cycle.     

Is RecG a general guardian of the bacterial genome?

The RecG protein of Escherichia coli is a double-stranded DNA translocase that unwinds a variety of branched DNAs in vitro, including Holliday junctions, replication forks, D-loops and R-loops. Coupled with the reported pleiotropy of recG mutations, this broad range of potential targets has made it hard to pin down what the protein does in vivo, though roles in recombination and replication fork repair have been suggested. However, recent studies suggest that RecG provides a more general defence against pathological DNA replication. We have postulated that this is achieved through the ability of RecG to eliminate substrates that the replication restart protein, PriA, could otherwise exploit to re-replicate the chromosome. Without RecG, PriA triggers a cascade of events that interfere with the duplication and segregation of chromosomes. Here we review the studies that led us to this idea and to conclude that RecG may be both a specialist activity and a general guardian of the genome.     

Situational repair of replication forks: roles of RecG and RecA proteins

Replication forks often stall or collapse when they encounter a DNA lesion. Fork regression is part of several major paths to the repair of stalled forks, allowing nonmutagenic bypass of the lesion. We have shown previously that Escherichia coli RecA protein can promote extensive regression of a forked DNA substrate that mimics a possible structure of a replication fork stalled at a leading strand lesion. Using electron microscopy and gel electrophoresis, we demonstrate that another protein, E. coli RecG helicase, promotes extensive fork regression in the same system. The RecG-catalyzed fork regression is very efficient and faster than the RecA-promoted reaction (up to 240 bp s(-1)), despite very limited processivity of the RecG protein. The reaction is dependent upon ATP hydrolysis and is stimulated by single-stranded binding protein. The RecA- and RecG-promoted reactions are not synergistic. In fact, RecG functions poorly under the conditions optimal for the RecA reaction, and vice versa. When both RecA and RecG proteins are incubated with the DNA substrate, high RecG concentrations inhibit the RecA protein-promoted fork regression. The very different reaction profiles may reflect a situational application of these proteins to the rescue of stalled replication forks in vivo.     

Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG

The stalling of DNA replication forks that occurs as a consequence of encountering DNA damage is a critical problem for cells. RecG protein is involved in the processing of stalled replication forks, and acts by reversing the fork past the damage to create a four-way junction that allows template switching and lesion bypass. We have determined the crystal structure of RecG bound to a DNA substrate that mimics a stalled replication fork. The structure not only reveals the elegant mechanism used by the protein to recognize junctions but has also trapped the protein in the initial stage of fork reversal. We propose a mechanism for how forks are processed by RecG to facilitate replication fork restart. In addition, this structure suggests that the mechanism and function of the two largest helicase superfamilies are distinct.     

RecG Directs DNA Synthesis during Double-Strand Break Repair

Homologous recombination provides a mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR) that requires an intact, homologous template for DNA synthesis. When DNA synthesis associated with DSBR is convergent, the broken DNA strands are replaced and repair is accurate. However, if divergent DNA synthesis is established, over-replication of flanking DNA may occur with deleterious consequences. The RecG protein of Escherichia coli is a helicase and translocase that can re-model 3-way and 4-way DNA structures such as replication forks and Holliday junctions. However, the primary role of RecG in live cells has remained elusive. Here we show that, in the absence of RecG, attempted DSBR is accompanied by divergent DNA replication at the site of an induced chromosomal DNA double-strand break. Furthermore, DNA double-stand ends are generated in a recG mutant at sites known to block replication forks. These double-strand ends, also trigger DSBR and the divergent DNA replication characteristic of this mutant, which can explain over-replication of the terminus region of the chromosome. The loss of DNA associated with unwinding joint molecules previously observed in the absence of RuvAB and RecG, is suppressed by a helicase deficient PriA mutation (priA300), arguing that the action of RecG ensures that PriA is bound correctly on D-loops to direct DNA replication rather than to unwind joint molecules. This has led us to put forward a revised model of homologous recombination in which the re-modelling of branched intermediates by RecG plays a fundamental role in directing DNA synthesis and thus maintaining genomic stability.     

Recombinations occurring in the process of DNA replication in Escherichia coli

In a number of works dealing with the relationship between replication and recombination in bacteria, it is assumed that recombinations permit the replication forks to resume moving after having stopped at the damage sites of the template DNA. As an evidence for recombination occurring during DNA replication, the involvement in this process of proteins RuvABC and RecG, providing processing of the Holliday junctions after recombination, is considered. However, it has been shown that these proteins are not essential for resuming DNA synthesis after an exposure of bacteria to UV light. These data cast doubt on the necessity of recombination for reactivation of replication initiated in the oriC region. Studying recombination in tandem duplications in Escherichia coli showed that during replication, unequal crossing over occurs between direct DNA repeats of sister chromosomes. In wild strains, this crossing over results in tandem duplications, thereby enhancing the expression of certain genes. Thus, recombination of two types occurs during DNA replication: unequal crossing over leading to duplications and homologous exchange, responsible for post-replication DNA repair. The unequal exchange constitutes a component of SOS response of the cell to deterioration of the environment.     

Anticipating chromosomal replication fork arrest: SSB targets repair DNA helicases to active forks

In bacteria, several salvage responses to DNA replication arrest culminate in reassembly of the replisome on inactivated forks to resume replication. The PriA DNA helicase is a prominent trigger of this replication restart process, preceded in many cases by a repair and/or remodeling of the arrested fork, which can be performed by many specific proteins. The mechanisms that target these rescue effectors to damaged forks in the cell are unknown. We report that the single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein is the key factor that links PriA to active chromosomal replication forks in vivo. This targeting mechanism determines the efficiency by which PriA reaches its specific DNA-binding site in vitro and directs replication restart in vivo. The RecG and RecQ DNA helicases, which are involved in intricate replication reactivation pathways, also associate with the chromosomal replication forks by similarly interacting with SSB. These results identify SSB as a platform for linking a 'repair toolbox' with active replication forks, providing a first line of rescue responses to accidental arrest.     

The function of recombinations occurring in the process of DNA replication in Escherichia coli

In a number of works dealing with the relationship between replication and recombination in bacteria, it is assumed that recombinations permit the replication forks to resume moving after having stopped at the damage sites of the template DNA. As an evidence for recombination occurring during DNA replication, the involvement in this process of proteins RuvABC and RecG, providing processing of the Holliday junctions after recombination, is considered. However, it has been shown that these proteins are not essential for resuming DNA synthesis after an exposure of bacteria to UV light. These data cast doubt on the necessity of recombination for reactivation of replication initiated in the oriC region. Studying recombination in tandem duplications in Escherichia coli showed that during replication, unequal crossing over occurs between direct DNA repeats of sister chromosomes. In wild strains, this crossing over results in tandem duplications, thereby enhancing the expression of certain genes. Thus, recombination of two types occurs during DNA replication: unequal crossing over leading to duplications and homologous exchange, responsible for post-replication DNA repair. The unequal exchange constitutes a component of SOS response of the cell to deterioration of the environment.     

Interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair based on the structure of RecG helicase

Recent studies in Escherichia coli indicate that the interconversion of DNA replication fork and Holliday junction structures underpins chromosome duplication and helps secure faithful transmission of the genome from one generation to the next. It facilitates interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair, and provides means to rescue replication forks stalled by lesions in or on the template DNA. Insight into how this interconversion may be catalysed has emerged from genetic, biochemical and structural studies of RecG protein, a member of superfamily 2 of DNA and RNA helicases. We describe how a single molecule of RecG might target a branched DNA structure and translocate a single duplex arm to drive branch migration of a Holliday junction, interconvert replication fork and Holliday junction structures and displace the invading strand from a D loop formed during recombination at a DNA end. We present genetic evidence suggesting how the latter activity may provide an efficient pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks that avoids crossing over, thus facilitating chromosome segregation at cell division.     

Characterisation of the catalytically active form of RecG helicase

Replication of DNA is fraught with difficulty and chromosomes contain many lesions which may block movement of the replicative machinery. However, several mechanisms to overcome such problems are beginning to emerge from studies with Escherichia coli. An important enzyme in one or more of these mechanisms is the RecG helicase, which may target stalled replication forks to generate a four-stranded (Holliday) junction, thus facilitating repair and/or bypass of the original lesion. To begin to understand how RecG might catalyse regression of fork structures, we have analysed what the catalytically active form of the enzyme may be. We have found that RecG exists as a monomer in solution as measured by gel filtration but when bound to junction DNA the enzyme forms two distinct protein–DNA complexes that contain one and two protein molecules. However, mutant inhibition studies failed to provide any evidence that RecG acts as a multimer in vitro. Additionally, there was no evidence for cooperativity in the junction DNA-stimulated hydrolysis of ATP. These data suggest that RecG functions as a monomer to unwind junction DNA, which supports an ‘inchworm’ rather than an ‘active rolling’ mechanism of DNA unwinding. The observed in vivo inhibition of wild-type RecG by mutant forms of the enzyme was attributed to occlusion of the DNA target and correlates with the very low abundance of replication forks within an E.coli cell, even during rapid growth.     

RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression

RecG and RuvAB are proposed to act at stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate replication restart. To define the roles of these proteins in fork regression, we used a combination of assays to determine whether RecG, RuvAB or both are capable of acting at a stalled fork. The results show that RecG binds to the C-terminus of single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) forming a stoichiometric complex of 2 RecG monomers per SSB tetramer. This binding occurs in solution and to SSB protein bound to single stranded DNA (ssDNA). The result of this binding is stabilization of the interaction of RecG with ssDNA. In contrast, RuvAB does not bind to SSB. Side-by-side analysis of the catalytic efficiency of the ATPase activity of each enzyme revealed that (−)scDNA and ssDNA are potent stimulators of the ATPase activity of RecG but not for RuvAB, whereas relaxed circular DNA is a poor cofactor for RecG but an excellent one for RuvAB. Collectively, these data suggest that the timing of repair protein access to the DNA at stalled forks is determined by the nature of the DNA available at the fork. We propose that RecG acts first, with RuvAB acting either after RecG or in a separate pathway following protein-independent fork regression.     

Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites

In bacteria, Ter sites bound to Tus/Rtp proteins halt replication forks moving only in one direction, providing a convenient mechanism to terminate them once the chromosome had been replicated. Considering the importance of replication termination and its position as a checkpoint in cell division, the accumulated knowledge on these systems has not dispelled fundamental questions regarding its role in cell biology: why are there so many copies of Ter, why are they distributed over such a large portion of the chromosome, why is the tus gene not conserved among bacteria, and why do tus mutants lack measurable phenotypes? Here we examine bacterial genomes using bioinformatics techniques to identify the region(s) where DNA polymerase III‐mediated replication has historically been terminated. We find that in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, changes in mutational bias patterns indicate that replication termination most likely occurs at or near the dif site. More importantly, there is no evidence from mutational bias signatures that replication forks originating at oriC have terminated at Ter sites. We propose that Ter sites participate in halting replication forks originating from DNA repair events, and not those originating at the chromosomal origin of replication.     

RuvAB and RecG are not essential for the recovery of DNA synthesis following UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli

Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.     

Resolution of Joint Molecules by RuvABC and RecG Following Cleavage of the Escherichia coli Chromosome by EcoKI

DNA double-strand breaks can be repaired by homologous recombination involving the formation and resolution of Holliday junctions. In Escherichia coli, the RuvABC resolvasome and the RecG branch-migration enzyme have been proposed to act in alternative pathways for the resolution of Holliday junctions. Here, we have studied the requirements for RuvABC and RecG in DNA double-strand break repair after cleavage of the E. coli chromosome by the EcoKI restriction enzyme. We show an asymmetry in the ability of RuvABC and RecG to deal with joint molecules in vivo. We detect linear DNA products compatible with the cleavage-ligation of Holliday junctions by the RuvABC pathway but not by the RecG pathway. Nevertheless we show that the XerCD-mediated pathway of chromosome dimer resolution is required for survival regardless of whether the RuvABC or the RecG pathway is active, suggesting that crossing-over is a common outcome irrespective of the pathway utilised. This poses a problem. How can cells resolve joint molecules, such as Holliday junctions, to generate crossover products without cleavage-ligation? We suggest that the mechanism of bacterial DNA replication provides an answer to this question and that RecG can facilitate replication through Holliday junctions.     

Conservation of RecG activity from pathogens to hyperthermophiles

Maintaining the integrity of the genome is essential for the survival of all organisms. RecG helicase plays an important part in this process in Escherichia coli, promoting recombination and DNA repair, and providing ways to rescue stalled replication forks by way of a Holliday junction intermediate. We purified RecG proteins from three other species: two Gram-positive mesophiles, Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and one extreme thermophile, Aquifex aeolicus. All three proteins bind and unwind replication fork and Holliday junction DNA molecules with efficiencies similar to the E. coli protein. Proteins from the Gram-positive species promote DNA repair in E. coli, indicating either that RecG acts alone or that any necessary protein-protein interactions are conserved. The S. pneumoniae RecG reduces plasmid copy number when expressed in E. coli, indicating that like the E. coli protein it unwinds plasmid R loop structures used to prime replication. This effect is not seen with B. subtilis RecG; the protein either lacks R loop unwinding activity or is compromised by having insufficient ATP. The A. aeolicus protein unwinds DNA well at 60 degrees C but is less efficient at 37 degrees C, explaining its inability to function in E. coli at this temperature. The N-terminal extension present in this protein was investigated and found to be dispensable for activity and thermo-stability. The results presented suggest that the role of RecG in DNA replication and repair is likely to be conserved throughout all bacteria, which underlines the importance of this protein in genome duplication and cell survival.     

Different genome stability proteins underpin primed and na?ve adaptation in E. coli CRISPR-Cas immunity

CRISPR-Cas is a prokaryotic immune system built from capture and integration of invader DNA into CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) loci, termed ‘Adaptation’, which is dependent on Cas1 and Cas2 proteins. In Escherichia coli, Cascade-Cas3 degrades invader DNA to effect immunity, termed ‘Interference’. Adaptation can interact with interference (‘primed’), or is independent of it (‘naïve’). We demonstrate that primed adaptation requires the RecG helicase and PriA protein to be present. Genetic analysis of mutant phenotypes suggests that RecG is needed to dissipate R-loops at blocked replication forks. Additionally, we identify that DNA polymerase I is important for both primed and naive adaptation, and that RecB is needed for naïve adaptation. Purified Cas1-Cas2 protein shows specificity for binding to and nicking forked DNA within single strand gaps, and collapsing forks into DNA duplexes. The data suggest that different genome stability systems interact with primed or naïve adaptation when responding to blocked or collapsed invader DNA replication. In this model, RecG and Cas3 proteins respond to invader DNA replication forks that are blocked by Cascade interference, enabling DNA capture. RecBCD targets DNA ends at collapsed forks, enabling DNA capture without interference. DNA polymerase I is proposed to fill DNA gaps during spacer integration.     

Replication termination and chromosome dimer resolution in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

Archaea of the genus Sulfolobus have a single-circular chromosome with three replication origins. All three origins fire in every cell in every cell cycle. Thus, three pairs of replication forks converge and terminate in each replication cycle. Here, we report 2D gel analyses of the replication fork fusion zones located between origins. These indicate that replication termination involves stochastic fork collision. In bacteria, replication termination is linked to chromosome dimer resolution, a process that requires the XerC and D recombinases, FtsK and the chromosomal dif site. Sulfolobus encodes a single-Xer homologue and its deletion gave rise to cells with aberrant DNA contents and increased volumes. Identification of the chromosomal dif site that binds Xer in vivo, and biochemical characterization of Xer/dif recombination revealed that, in contrast to bacteria, dif is located outside the fork fusion zones. Therefore, it appears that replication termination and dimer resolution are temporally and spatially distinct processes in Sulfolobus.     

RecA-mediated rescue of Escherichia coli strains with replication forks arrested at the terminus

The recombinational rescue of chromosome replication was investigated in Escherichia coli strains with the unidirectional origin oriR1, from the plasmid R1, integrated within oriC in clockwise (intR1(CW)) or counterclockwise (intR1(CC)) orientations. Only the intR1(CC) strain, with replication forks arrested at the terminus, required RecA for survival. Unlike the strains with RecA-dependent replication known so far, the intR1(CC) strain did not require RecBCD, RecF, RecG, RecJ, RuvAB, or SOS activation for viability. The overall levels of degradation of replicating chromosomes caused by inactivation of RecA were similar in oriC and intR1(CC) strains. In the intR1(CC) strain, RecA was also needed to maintain the integrity of the chromosome when the unidirectional replication forks were blocked at the terminus. This was consistent with suppression of the RecA dependence of the intR1(CC) strain by inactivating Tus, the protein needed to block replication forks at Ter sites. Thus, RecA is essential during asymmetric chromosome replication for the stable maintenance of the forks arrested at the terminus and for their eventual passage across the termination barrier(s) independently of the SOS and some of the major recombination pathways.     

UV-induced ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) activation requires replication stress

Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) plays an essential role in the maintenance of genome integrity and cell viability. The kinase is activated in response to DNA damage and initiates a checkpoint signaling cascade by phosphorylating a number of downstream substrates including Chk1. Unlike ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), which appears to be mainly activated by DNA double-strand breaks, ATR can be activated by a variety of DNA damaging agents. However, it is still unclear what triggers ATR activation in response to such diverse DNA lesions. One model proposes that ATR can directly recognize DNA lesions, while other recent data suggest that ATR is activated by a common single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediate generated during DNA repair. In this study, we show that UV lesions do not directly activate ATR in vivo. In addition, ssDNA lesions created during the repair of UV damage are also not sufficient to activate the ATR-dependent pathway. ATR activation is only observed in replicating cells indicating that replication stress is required to trigger the ATR-mediated checkpoint cascade in response to UV irradiation. Interestingly, H2AX appears to be required for the accumulation of ATR at stalled replication forks. Together our data suggest that ssDNA at arrested replication forks recruits ATR and initiates ATR-mediated phosphorylation of H2AX and Chk1. Phosphorylated H2AX might further facilitate ATR activation by stabilizing ATR at the sites of arrested replication forks.