Isolation of gram quantities of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from an overproducing strain of Escherichia coli and its use for purification of cognate tRNA

The ileS gene coding for isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase was cloned on a runaway-replication plasmid. From the cells harboring the plasmid, gram quantities of the synthetase were isolated using two column procedures. The synthetase was used for the purification of cognate tRNA. Isoleucine tRNAGAU of greater than 90% purity was easily isolated by taking advantage of a specific complex formation of the synthetase with cognate tRNA.     

A cognate tRNA specific conformational change in glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and its implication for specificity.

Conformational changes that occur upon substrate binding are known to play crucial roles in the recognition and specific aminoacylation of cognate tRNA by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. In a previous study we had shown that glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase labeled selectively in a nonessential sulfhydryl residue by an environment sensitive probe, acrylodan, monitors many of the conformational changes that occur upon substrate binding. In this article we have shown that the conformational change that occurs upon tRNA(Gln) binding to glnRS/ATP complex is absent in a noncognate tRNA tRNA(Glu)-glnRS/ATP complex. CD spectroscopy indicates that this cognate tRNA(Gln)-induced conformational change may involve only a small change in secondary structure. The Van't Hoff plot of cognate and noncognate tRNA binding in the presence of ATP is similar, suggesting similar modes of interaction. It was concluded that the cognate tRNA induces a local conformational change in the synthetase that may be one of the critical elements that causes enhanced aminoacylation of the cognate tRNA over the noncognate ones.     

tRNA-controlled nuclear import of a human tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, essential components of the cytoplasmic translation apparatus, also have nuclear functions that continue to be elucidated. However, little is known about how the distribution between cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments is controlled. Using a combination of methods, here we showed that human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) distributes to the nucleus and that the nuclear import of human TyrRS is regulated by its cognate tRNA(Tyr). We identified a hexapeptide motif in the anticodon recognition domain that is critical for nuclear import of the synthetase. Remarkably, this nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence motif is also important for interacting with tRNA(Tyr). As a consequence, mutational alteration of the hexapeptide simultaneously attenuated aminoacylation and nuclear localization. Because the NLS is sterically blocked when the cognate tRNA is bound to TyrRS, we hypothesized that the nuclear distribution of TyrRS is regulated by tRNA(Tyr). This expectation was confirmed by RNAi knockdown of tRNA(Tyr) expression, which led to robust nuclear import of TyrRS. Further bioinformatics analysis showed that to have nuclear import of TyrRS directly controlled by tRNA(Tyr) in higher organisms, the NLS of lower eukaryotes was abandoned, whereas the new NLS was evolved from an anticodon-binding hexapeptide motif. Thus, higher organisms developed a strategy to make tRNA a regulator of the nuclear trafficking of its cognate synthetase. The design in principle should coordinate nuclear import of a tRNA synthetase with the demands of protein synthesis in the cytoplasm.     

Distortion of tRNA upon near-cognate codon recognition on the ribosome

The accurate decoding of the genetic information by the ribosome relies on the communication between the decoding center of the ribosome, where the tRNA anticodon interacts with the codon, and the GTPase center of EF-Tu, where GTP hydrolysis takes place. In the A/T state of decoding, the tRNA undergoes a large conformational change that results in a more open, distorted tRNA structure. Here we use a real-time transient fluorescence quenching approach to monitor the timing and the extent of the tRNA distortion upon reading cognate or near-cognate codons. The tRNA is distorted upon codon recognition and remains in that conformation until the tRNA is released from EF-Tu, although the extent of distortion gradually changes upon transition from the pre- to the post-hydrolysis steps of decoding. The timing and extent of the rearrangement is similar on cognate and near-cognate codons, suggesting that the tRNA distortion alone does not provide a specific switch for the preferential activation of GTP hydrolysis on the cognate codon. Thus, although the tRNA plays an active role in signal transmission between the decoding and GTPase centers, other regulators of signaling must be involved.     

Flipping of the Ribosomal A-Site Adenines Provides a Basis for tRNA Selection

Ribosomes control the missense error rate of ~ 10^− 4 during translation though quantitative contributions of individual mechanistic steps of the conformational changes yet to be fully determined. Biochemical and biophysical studies led to a qualitative tRNA selection model in which ribosomal A-site residues A1492 and A1493 (A1492/3) flip out in response to cognate tRNA binding, promoting the subsequent reactions, but not in the case of near-cognate or non-cognate tRNA. However, this model was recently questioned by X-ray structures revealing conformations of extrahelical A1492/3 and domain closure of the decoding center in both cognate and near-cognate tRNA bound ribosome complexes, suggesting that the non-specific flipping of A1492/3 has no active role in tRNA selection. We explore this question by carrying out molecular dynamics simulations, aided with fluorescence and NMR experiments, to probe the free energy cost of extrahelical flipping of 1492/3 and the strain energy associated with domain conformational change. Our rigorous calculations demonstrate that the A1492/3 flipping is indeed a specific response to the binding of cognate tRNA, contributing 3 kcal/mol to the specificity of tRNA selection. Furthermore, the different A-minor interactions in cognate and near-cognate complexes propagate into the conformational strain and contribute another 4 kcal/mol in domain closure. The recent structure of ribosome with features of extrahelical A1492/3 and closed domain in near-cognate complex is reconciled by possible tautomerization of the wobble base pair in mRNA–tRNA. These results quantitatively rationalize other independent experimental observations and explain the ribosomal discrimination mechanism of selecting cognate versus near-cognate tRNA.     

tRNA discrimination at the binding step by a class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases preserve the fidelity of decoding genetic information by accurately joining amino acids to their cognate transfer RNAs. Here, tRNA discrimination at the level of binding by Escherichia coli histidyl-tRNA synthetase is addressed by filter binding, analytical ultracentrifugation, and iodine footprinting experiments. Competitive filter binding assays show that the presence of an adenylate analogue 5'-O-[N-(L-histidyl)sulfamoyl]adenosine, HSA, decreased the apparent dissociation constant (K(D)) for cognate tRNA(His) by more than 3-fold (from 3.87 to 1.17 microM), and doubled the apparent K(D) for noncognate tRNA(Phe) (from 7.3 to 14.5 microM). By contrast, no binding discrimination against mutant U73 tRNA(His) was observed, even in the presence of HSA. Additional filter binding studies showed tighter binding of both cognate and noncognate tRNAs by G405D mutant HisRS [Yan, W., Augustine, J., and Francklyn, C. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6559], which possesses a single amino acid change in the C-terminal anticodon binding domain. Discrimination against noncognate tRNA was also observed in sedimentation velocity experiments, which showed that a stable complex was formed with the cognate tRNA(His) but not with noncognate tRNA(Phe). Footprinting experiments on wild-type versus G405D HisRS revealed characteristic alterations in the pattern of protection and enhancement of iodine cleavage at phosphates 5' to tRNA nucleotides in the anticodon and hinge regions. Together, these results suggest that the anticodon and core regions play major roles in the initial binding discrimination between cognate and noncognate tRNAs, whereas acceptor stem nucleotides, particularly at position 73, influence the reaction at steps after binding of tRNA.     

Amino acid activation of a dual-specificity tRNA synthetase is independent of tRNA

Transfer RNA can play a role in amino acid activation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For the prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) of Methanococcus jannaschii, which activates both proline and cysteine, the role of tRNA in amino acid selection and activation is of interest in the effort to understand the mechanism of the dual-specificity. While activation of proline does not require tRNA, whether or not tRNA is required in the activation of cysteine has been a matter of debate. Here, investigation of a series of buffer conditions shows that activation of cysteine occurs without tRNA in a wide-range of buffers. However, the extent of cysteine activation is strongly buffer-dependent, varying over a 180-fold range. In contrast, the extent of proline activation is much less sensitive to buffer conditions, varying over only a 36-fold range. We also find that addition of tRNA has a small threefold stimulatory effect on cysteine activation. The lack of a major role of tRNA in activation of cysteine suggests that the dual-specificity enzyme must distinguish cysteine from proline directly, without the assistance of each cognate tRNA, to achieve the necessary specificity required for protein synthesis.     

Amino acid modifications on tRNA

The accurate formation of cognate aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) is essential for the fidelity of translation. Most amino acids are esterified onto their cognate tRNA isoacceptors directly by aa-tRNA synthetases. However, in the case of four amino acids (Gln, Asn, Cys and Sec), aminoacyl-tRNAs are made through indirect pathways in many organisms across all three domains of life. The process begins with the charging of noncognate amino acids to tRNAs by a specialized synthetase in the case of Cys-tRNA(Cys) formation or by synthetases with relaxed specificity, such as the non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA, non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases. The resulting misacylated tRNAs are then converted to cognate pairs through transformation of the amino acids on the tRNA, which is catalyzed by a group of tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes, such as tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase and Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. The majority of these indirect pathways are widely spread in all domains of life and thought to be part of the evolutionary process.     

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-induced cleavage of tRNA.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases interact with their cognate tRNAs in a highly specific fashion. We have examined the phenomenon that upon complex formation E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase destabilizes tRNA(Gln) causing chain scissions in the presence of Mg2+ ions. The phosphodiester bond cleavage produces 3'-phosphate and 5'-hydroxyl ends. This kind of experiment is useful for detecting conformational changes in tRNA. Our results show that the cleavage is synthetase-specific, that mutant and wild-type tRNA(Gln) species can assume a different conformation, and that modified nucleosides in tRNA enhance the structural stability of the molecule.     

Kinetic discrimination of tRNA identity by the conserved motif 2 loop of a class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

The selection of tRNAs by their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is critical for ensuring the fidelity of protein synthesis. While nucleotides that comprise tRNA identity sets have been readily identified, their specific role in the elementary steps of aminoacylation is poorly understood. By use of a rapid kinetics analysis employing mutants in tRNA(His) and its cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, the role of tRNA identity in aminoacylation was investigated. While mutations in the tRNA anticodon preferentially affected the thermodynamics of initial complex formation, mutations in the acceptor stem or the conserved motif 2 loop of the tRNA synthetase imposed a specific kinetic block on aminoacyl transfer and decreased tRNA-mediated kinetic control of amino acid activation. The mechanistic basis of tRNA identity is analogous to fidelity control by DNA polymerases and the ribosome, whose reactions also demand high accuracy.     

Kinetic determinants of high-fidelity tRNA discrimination on the ribosome

The ribosome selects aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) matching to the mRNA codon from the bulk of non-matching aa-tRNAs in two consecutive selection steps, initial selection and proofreading. Here we report the kinetic analysis of selection taking place under conditions where the overall selectivity was close to values observed in vivo and initial selection and proofreading contributed about equally. Comparison of the rate constants shows that the 350-fold difference in stabilities of cognate and near-cognate codon-anticodon complexes is not used for tRNA selection due to high rate of GTP hydrolysis in the cognate complex. tRNA selection at the initial selection step is entirely kinetically controlled and is due to much faster (650-fold) GTP hydrolysis of cognate compared to near-cognate substrate.     

Interaction of eukaryotic threonyl-tRNA synthetase with high-Mr RNAs and tRNA(Thr)

Threonyl-tRNA synthetase of rabbit reticulocytes was purified to homogeneity. We have found that this enzyme can interact not only with cognate tRNA(Thr), but also with high-Mr RNAs. tRNA(Thr) removes rRNA from the complexes with threonyl-tRNA synthetase. On the other hand, rRNA is unable to dissociate tRNA(Thr) from the complexes with the enzyme. Despite its dimeric organization, threonyl-tRNA synthetase is unable to form stable ternary complexes with tRNA(Thr) and rRNA. In the extract of rabbit reticulocytes about one-third of the threonyl-tRNA synthetase molecules are in association with cognate tRNA(Thr) and thus are unable to interact with high-Mr RNAs.     

tRNA aminoacylation by arginyl-tRNA synthetase: induced conformations during substrates binding

The 2.2 A crystal structure of a ternary complex formed by yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase and its cognate tRNA(Arg) in the presence of the L-arginine substrate highlights new atomic features used for specific substrate recognition. This first example of an active complex formed by a class Ia aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and its natural cognate tRNA illustrates additional strategies used for specific tRNA selection. The enzyme specifically recognizes the D-loop and the anticodon of the tRNA, and the mutually induced fit produces a conformation of the anticodon loop never seen before. Moreover, the anticodon binding triggers conformational changes in the catalytic center of the protein. The comparison with the 2.9 A structure of a binary complex formed by yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA(Arg) reveals that L-arginine binding controls the correct positioning of the CCA end of the tRNA(Arg). Important structural changes induced by substrate binding are observed in the enzyme. Several key residues of the active site play multiple roles in the catalytic pathway and thus highlight the structural dynamics of the aminoacylation reaction.     

Functional idiosyncrasies of tRNA isoacceptors in cognate and noncognate aminoacylation systems

The specificity of transfer RNA aminoacylation by cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is a crucial step for synthesis of functional proteins. It is established that the aminoacylation identity of a single tRNA or of a family of tRNA isoacceptors is linked to the presence of positive signals (determinants) allowing recognition by cognate synthetases and negative signals (antideterminants) leading to rejection by the noncognate ones. The completion of identity sets was generally tested by transplantation of the corresponding nucleotides into one or several host tRNAs which acquire as a consequence the new aminoacylation specificities. Such transplantation experiments were also useful to detect peculiar structural refinements required for optimal expression of a given aminoacylation identity set within a host tRNA. This study explores expression of the defined yeast aspartate identity set into different tRNA scaffolds of a same specificity, namely the four yeast tRNA(Arg) isoacceptors. The goal was to investigate whether expression of the new identity is similar due to the unique specificity of the host tRNAs or whether it is differently expressed due to their peculiar sequences and structural features. In vitro transcribed native tRNA(Arg) isoacceptors and variants bearing the aspartate identity elements were prepared and their aminoacylation properties established. The four wild-type isoacceptors are active in arginylation with catalytic efficiencies in a 20-fold range and are inactive in aspartylation. While transplanted tRNA(1)(Arg) and tRNA(4)(Arg) are converted into highly efficient substrates for yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, transplanted tRNA(2)(Arg) and tRNA(3)(Arg) remain poorly aspartylated. Search for antideterminants in these two tRNAs reveals idiosyncratic features. Conversion of the single base-pair C6-G67 into G6-C67, the pair present in tRNA(Asp), allows full expression of the aspartate identity in the transplanted tRNA(2)(Arg), but not in tRNA(3)(Arg). It is concluded that the different isoacceptor tRNAs protect themselves from misaminoacylation by idiosyncratic pathways of antidetermination.     

Evidence for two types of complexes formed by yeast tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase with cognate and non-cognate tRNA. Effect of ribonucleoside triphosphates

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at pH 8.3 was used to detect and quantitate the formation of the yeast tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (an alpha 2-type enzyme) complex with its cognate tRNA. Electrophoretic mobility of the complex is intermediate between the free enzyme and free tRNA; picomolar quantities can be readily detected by silver staining and quantitated by densitometry of autoradiograms when [32P]tRNA is used. Two kinds of complexes of Tyr-tRNA synthetase with yeast tRNA(Tyr) were detected. A slower-moving complex is formed at ratios of tRNA(Tyr)/enzyme less than or equal to 0.5; it is assigned the composition tRNA.(alpha 2)2. At higher ratios, a faster-moving complex is formed, approaching saturation at tRNA(Tyr)/enzyme = 1; any excess of tRNA(Tyr) remains unbound. This complex is assigned the composition tRNA.alpha 2. The slower, i.e. tRNA.(alpha 2)2 complex, but not the faster complex, can be formed even with non-cognate tRNAs. Competition experiments show that the affinity of the enzyme towards tRNA(Tyr) is at least 10-fold higher than that for the non-cognate tRNAs. ATP and GTP affect the electrophoretic mobility of the enzyme and prevent the formation of tRNA.(alpha 2)2 complexes both with cognate and non-cognate tRNAs, while neither tyrosine, as the third substrate of Tyr tRNA synthetase, nor AMP, AMP/PPi, or spermidine, have such effects. Hence, the ATP-mediated formation of the alpha 2 structure parallels the increase in specificity of the enzyme towards its cognate tRNA.     

Two-step aminoacylation of tRNA without channeling in Archaea

Catalysis of sequential reactions is often envisaged to occur by channeling of substrate between enzyme active sites without release into bulk solvent. However, while there are compelling physiological rationales for direct substrate transfer, proper experimental support for the hypothesis is often lacking, particularly for metabolic pathways involving RNA. Here, we apply transient kinetics approaches developed to study channeling in bienzyme complexes to an archaeal protein synthesis pathway featuring the misaminoacylated tRNA intermediate Glu-tRNA^Gln. Experimental and computational elucidation of a kinetic and thermodynamic framework for two-step cognate Gln-tRNA^Gln synthesis demonstrates that the misacylating aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS^ND) and the tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (GatDE) function sequentially without channeling. Instead, rapid processing of the misacylated tRNA intermediate by GatDE and preferential elongation factor binding to the cognate Gln-tRNA^Gln together permit accurate protein synthesis without formation of a binary protein-protein complex between GluRS^ND and GatDE. These findings establish an alternate paradigm for protein quality control via two-step pathways for cognate aminoacyl-tRNA formation.     

Improved separation of modified nucleosides from tRNA hydrolysates: the patterns of tRNA methylation in rat tissues

A sensitive and reproducible method for the isolation of minor nucleosides derived from tRNA is described. The nucleosides obtained from enzymatic digestion of tRNA are separated into several groups using a QAE Sephadex column and increasing concentrations of boric acid in a step-wise manner. The nucleosides in each group are separated by isocratic elution from a preparative Partisil 10-SCX column and high-performance liquid chromatography at ambient temperature. With this method we have determined the patterns of tRNA methylation in vitro with extracts from rat bone, liver, kidney and adrenal glands. Although different tissues appear to contain the same tRNA methyltransferases, the patterns of methylated nucleosides are different.     

The tRNA A76 Hydroxyl Groups Control Partitioning of the tRNA-dependent Pre- and Post-transfer Editing Pathways in Class I tRNA Synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze ATP-dependent covalent coupling of cognate amino acids and tRNAs for ribosomal protein synthesis. Escherichia coli isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) exploits both the tRNA-dependent pre- and post-transfer editing pathways to minimize errors in translation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which tRNA^Ile organizes the synthetic site to enhance pre-transfer editing, an idiosyncratic feature of IleRS, remains elusive. Here we show that tRNA^Ile affects both the synthetic and editing reactions localized within the IleRS synthetic site. In a complex with cognate tRNA, IleRS exhibits a 10-fold faster aminoacyl-AMP hydrolysis and a 10-fold drop in amino acid affinity relative to the free enzyme. Remarkably, the specificity against non-cognate valine was not improved by the presence of tRNA in either of these processes. Instead, amino acid specificity is determined by the protein component per se, whereas the tRNA promotes catalytic performance of the synthetic site, bringing about less error-prone and kinetically optimized isoleucyl-tRNA^Ile synthesis under cellular conditions. Finally, the extent to which tRNA^Ile modulates activation and pre-transfer editing is independent of the intactness of its 3′-end. This finding decouples aminoacylation and pre-transfer editing within the IleRS synthetic site and further demonstrates that the A76 hydroxyl groups participate in post-transfer editing only. The data are consistent with a model whereby the 3′-end of the tRNA remains free to sample different positions within the IleRS·tRNA complex, whereas the fine-tuning of the synthetic site is attained via conformational rearrangement of the enzyme through the interactions with the remaining parts of the tRNA body.     

Crystal structure of an Escherichia coli tRNA(Gly) microhelix at 2.0 A resolution

tRNA identity elements determine the correct aminoacylation by the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. In class II aminoacyl tRNA synthetase systems, tRNA specificity is assured by rather few and simple recognition elements, mostly located in the acceptor stem of the tRNA. Here we present the crystal structure of an Escherichia coli tRNA(Gly) aminoacyl stem microhelix at 2.0 A resolution. The tRNA(Gly) microhelix crystallizes in the space group P3(2)21 with the cell constants a=b=35.35 A, c=130.82 A, gamma=120 degrees . The helical parameters, solvent molecules and a potential magnesium binding site are discussed.