The importin β binding domain as a master regulator of nucleocytoplasmic transport

Specific and efficient recognition of import cargoes is essential to ensure nucleocytoplasmic transport. To this end, the prototypical karyopherin importin β associates with import cargoes directly or, more commonly, through import adaptors, such as importin α and snurportin. Adaptor proteins bind the nuclear localization sequence (NLS) of import cargoes while recruiting importin β via an N-terminal importin β binding (IBB) domain. The use of adaptors greatly expands and amplifies the repertoire of cellular cargoes that importin β can efficiently import into the cell nucleus and allows for fine regulation of nuclear import. Accordingly, the IBB domain is a dedicated NLS, unique to adaptor proteins that functions as a molecular liaison between importin β and import cargoes. This review provides an overview of the molecular role played by the IBB domain in orchestrating nucleocytoplasmic transport. Recent work has determined that the IBB domain has specialized functions at every step of the import and export pathway. Unexpectedly, this stretch of ~ 40 amino acids plays an essential role in regulating processes such as formation of the import complex, docking and translocation through the nuclear pore complex (NPC), release of import cargoes into the cell nucleus and finally recycling of import adaptors and importin β into the cytoplasm. Thus, the IBB domain is a master regulator of nucleocytoplasmic transport, whose complex molecular function is only recently beginning to emerge. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Regulation of Signaling and Cellular Fate through Modulation of Nuclear Protein Import.     

Exportin-5, a novel karyopherin, mediates nuclear export of double-stranded RNA binding proteins.

We have identified a novel human karyopherin (Kap) beta family member that is related to human Crm1 and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein, Msn5p/Kap142p. Like other known transport receptors, this Kap binds specifically to RanGTP, interacts with nucleoporins, and shuttles between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. We report that interleukin enhancer binding factor (ILF)3, a double-stranded RNA binding protein, associates with this Kap in a RanGTP-dependent manner and that its double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) is the limiting sequence required for this interaction. Importantly, the Kap interacts with dsRBDs found in several other proteins and binding is blocked by double-stranded RNA. We find that the dsRBD of ILF3 functions as a novel nuclear export sequence (NES) in intact cells, and its ability to serve as an NES is dependent on the expression of the Kap. In digitonin-permeabilized cells, the Kap but not Crm1 stimulated nuclear export of ILF3. Based on the ability of this Kap to mediate the export of dsRNA binding proteins, we named the protein exportin-5. We propose that exportin-5 is not an RNA export factor but instead participates in the regulated translocation of dsRBD proteins to the cytoplasm where they interact with target mRNAs.     

Importin-beta-like nuclear transport receptors

In recent years, our understanding of macromolecular transport processes across the nuclear envelope has grown dramatically, and a large number of soluble transport receptors mediating either nuclear import or nuclear export have been identified. Most of these receptors belong to one large family of proteins, all of which share homology with the protein import receptor importin β (also named karyopherin β). Members of this family have been classified as importins or exportins on the basis of the direction they carry their cargo. To date, the family includes 14 members in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and at least 22 members in humans. Importins and exportins are regulated by the small GTPase Ran, which is thought to be highly enriched in the nucleus in its GTP-bound form. Importins recognize their substrates in the cytoplasm and transport them through nuclear pores into the nucleus. In the nucleoplasm, RanGTP binds to importins, inducing the release of import cargoes. In contrast, exportins interact with their substrates only in the nucleus in the presence of RanGTP and release them after GTP hydrolysis in the cytoplasm, causing disassembly of the export complex. Thus, common features of all importin-β-like transport factors are their ability to shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, their interaction with RanGTP as well as their ability to recognize specific transport substrates.     

Nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins

In eukaryotic cells, the movement of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm occurs through the nuclear pore complex (NPC)--a large protein complex spanning the nuclear envelope. The nuclear transport of proteins is usually mediated by a family of transport receptors known as karyopherins. Karyopherins bind to their cargoes via recognition of nuclear localization signal (NLS) for nuclear import or nuclear export signal (NES) for export to form a transport complex. Its transport through NPC is facilitated by transient interactions between the karyopherins and NPC components. The interactions of karyopherins with their cargoes are regulated by GTPase Ran. In the current review, we describe the NPC structure, NLS, and NES, as well as the model of classic Ran-dependent transport, with special emphasis on existing alternative mechanisms; we also propose a classification of the basic mechanisms of protein transport regulation.     

Transport between the cytoplasm and the nucleus

Summary Active transport of proteins and RNAs across the nuclear-pore complex (NPC) is mediated by a family of related transport receptors which shuttle between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm. A number of import and export pathways have been described. Some transport substrates require adapters which mediate association with certain transporters. The transport receptors specifically bind to a recognition signal within the transport substrate or adapter, pass the NPC in one direction, and deliver their cargo to the other side of the nuclear envelope. The Ran GTPase is the crucial regulator of bidirectional transport. Ran-modulating proteins establish an asymmetric intracellular distribution of Ran. As a result, Ran is mainly bound to GTP in the nucleus and to GDP in the cytoplasm. Evidently, RanGTP regulates binding and release of the transport substrates by binding to the transport receptors in the nucleus as well as the transport direction across the NPC. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of translocation through the NPC.     

The translocation of transportin–cargo complexes through nuclear pores is independent of both Ran and energy

Active transport between nucleus and cytoplasm proceeds through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and is mediated largely by shuttling transport receptors that use direct RanGTP binding to coordinate loading and unloading of cargo [1], [2], [3], [4]. Import receptors such as importin β or transportin bind their substrates at low RanGTP levels in the cytoplasm and release them upon encountering RanGTP in the nucleus, where a high RanGTP concentration is predicted. This substrate release is, in the case of import by the importin α/β heterodimer, coupled directly to importin β release from the NPCs. If the importin β –RanGTP interaction is prevented, import intermediates arrest at the nuclear side of the NPCs [5], [6]. This arrest makes it difficult to probe directly the Ran and energy requirements of the actual translocation from the cytoplasmic to the nuclear side of the NPC, which immediately precedes substrate release. Here, we have shown that in the case of transportin, dissociation of transportin–substrate complexes is uncoupled from transportin release from NPCs. This allowed us to dissect the requirements of translocation through the NPC, substrate release and transportin recycling. Surprisingly, translocation of transportin–substrate complexes into the nucleus requires neither Ran nor nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). It is only nuclear RanGTP, not GTP hydrolysis, that is needed for dissociation of transportin–substrate complexes and for re-export of transportin to the cytoplasm. GTP hydrolysis is apparently required only to restore the import competence of the re-exported transportin and, thus, for multiple rounds of transportin-dependent import. In addition, we provide evidence that at least one type of substrate can also complete NPC passage mediated by importin β independently of Ran and energy.     

The interaction between importin-α and Nup153 promotes importin-α/β-mediated nuclear import

Nuclear transport is mediated by transport factors, including the importin β family members. The directionality of nuclear transport is governed by the asymmetrical distribution of the small GTPase Ran. Of note, importin α/β-mediated import of classical nuclear localization signal (cNLS)--containing cargo is more efficient than other Ran-dependent import pathways that do not require importin α. In this study, we characterized the role of importin α in nuclear transport by examining import efficiencies of cNLS-cargo/importin α/β complexes. We first depleted digitonin-permeabilized semi-intact cells of endogenous importin α and used the cells to show that the interaction between importin α and Nup153--a component of the nuclear pore complex (NPC)--is essential for efficient import of importin β-binding domain containing substrates, but not other cargoes that directly bind to importin β. Moreover, we found that the binding of importin α to Nup153 facilitates cNLS-mediated import, and demonstrated that importin α in import complexes and cargo-free importin α prebound to Nup153 promote efficient import of cNLS-containing proteins. This is the first in vitro study showing that in conjunction with Nup153, importin α contributes to directionally biased exit of cNLS-containing cargo to the nuclear side of NPCs.     

Structure of Importin13-Ubc9 complex: nuclear import and release of a key regulator of sumoylation

Importin13 (Imp13) is an unusual β‐karyopherin that is able to both import and export cargoes in and out of the nucleus. In the cytoplasm, Imp13 associates with different cargoes such as Mago‐Y14 and Ubc9, and facilitates their import into the nucleus where RanGTP binding promotes the release of the cargo. In this study, we present the 2.8 Å resolution crystal structure of Imp13 in complex with the SUMO E2‐conjugating enzyme, Ubc9. The structure shows an uncommon mode of cargo–karyopherin recognition with Ubc9 binding at the N‐terminal portion of Imp13, occupying the entire RanGTP‐binding site. Comparison of the Imp13–Ubc9 complex with Imp13–Mago‐Y14 shows the remarkable plasticity of Imp13, whose conformation changes from a closed ring to an open superhelix when bound to the two different cargoes. The structure also shows that the binding mode is compatible with the sumoylated states of Ubc9. Indeed, we find that Imp13 is able to bind sumoylated Ubc9 in vitro and suppresses autosumoylation activity in the complex.     

NTF2 mediates nuclear import of Ran.

Importin beta family transport receptors shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and mediate transport of macromolecules through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The interactions between these receptors and their cargoes are regulated by binding RanGTP; all receptors probably exit the nucleus complexed with RanGTP, and so should deplete RanGTP continuously from the nucleus. We describe here the development of an in vitro system to study how nuclear Ran is replenished. Nuclear import of Ran does not rely on simple diffusion as Ran's small size would permit, but instead is stimulated by soluble transport factors. This facilitated import is specific for cytoplasmic RanGDP and employs nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) as the actual carrier. NTF2 binds RanGDP initially to NPCs and probably also mediates translocation of the NTF2-RanGDP complex to the nuclear side of the NPCs. A direct NTF2-RanGDP interaction is crucial for this process, since point mutations that disturb the RanGDP-NTF2 interaction also interfere with Ran import. The subsequent nuclear accumulation of Ran also requires GTP, but not GTP hydrolysis. The release of Ran from NTF2 into the nucleus, and thus the directionality of Ran import, probably involves nucleotide exchange to generate RanGTP, for which NTF2 has no detectable affinity, followed by binding of the RanGTP to an importin beta family transport receptor.     

Conformational variability of nucleo-cytoplasmic transport factors

The transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is largely mediated by a single family of transport factors, the karyopherin or importin beta-like family. Structural and biochemical evidence suggests conformational flexibility of these modular HEAT-repeat proteins is crucial for their regulation. Here we use small angle x-ray scattering to assess the extent of conformational variation within a set of nuclear import and export factors. The study reveals that importin beta, transportin, and the exportin Xpo-t share a similar S-like superhelical conformation in their unbound state. There are no obvious differences in the overall structures that might generally distinguish nuclear export from nuclear import mediators. Two other members of the family, the exportins Cse1 and Xpo1, possess a significantly more globular conformation, indicating that the extended S-like architecture is not a hallmark of all karyopherins. Binding of RanGTP/cargo to importin beta, transportin, and Xpo-t triggers distinct conformational responses, suggesting that even closely related karyopherins employ different mechanisms of conformational regulation and that cargo and nuclear pore-interacting surfaces of the different receptors may be unique.     

Dissecting the roles of Cse1 and Nup2 in classical NLS‐cargo release in vivo

The importin α/β transport machinery mediates the nuclear import of cargo proteins that bear a classical nuclear localization sequence (cNLS). These cargo proteins are linked to the major nuclear protein import factor, importin‐β, by the importin‐α adapter, after which cargo/carrier complexes enter the nucleus through nuclear pores. In the nucleus, cargo is released by the action of RanGTP and the nuclear pore protein Nup2, after which the importins are recycled to the cytoplasm for further transport cycles. The nuclear export of importin‐α is mediated by Cse1/CAS. Here, we exploit structures of functionally important complexes to identify residues that are critical for these interactions and provide insight into how cycles of protein import and recycling of importin‐α occur in vivo using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae model. We examine how these molecular interactions impact protein localization, cargo import, function and complex formation. We show that reversing the charge of key residues in importin‐α (Arg44) or Cse1 (Asp220) results in loss of function of the respective proteins and impairs complex formation both in vitro and in vivo. To extend these results, we show that basic residues in the Nup2 N‐terminus are required for both Nup2 interaction with importin‐α and Nup2 function. These results provide a more comprehensive mechanistic model of how Cse1, RanGTP and Nup2 function in concert to mediate cNLS‐cargo release in the nucleus.     

The nucleoporin Nup60p functions as a Gsp1p-GTP-sensitive tether for Nup2p at the nuclear pore complex

The nucleoporins Nup60p, Nup2p, and Nup1p form part of the nuclear basket structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear pore complex (NPC). Here, we show that these necleoporins can be isolated from yeast extracts by affinity chromatography on karyopherin Kap95p-coated beads. To characterize Nup60p further, Nup60p-coated beads were used to capture its interacting proteins from extracts. We find that Nup60p binds to Nup2p and serves as a docking site for Kap95p-Kap60p heterodimers and Kap123p. Nup60p also binds Gsp1p-GTP and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor Prp20p, and functions as a Gsp1p guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor by reducing the activity of Prp20p. Yeast lacking Nup60p exhibit minor defects in nuclear export of Kap60p, nuclear import of Kap95p-Kap60p-dependent cargoes, and diffusion of small proteins across the NPC. Yeast lacking Nup60p also fail to anchor Nup2p at the NPC, resulting in the mislocalization of Nup2p to the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm. Purified Nup60p and Nup2p bind each other directly, but the stability of the complex is compromised when Kap60p binds Nup2p. Gsp1p-GTP enhances by 10-fold the affinity between Nup60p and Nup2p, and restores binding of Nup2p-Kap60p complexes to Nup60p. The results suggest a dynamic interaction, controlled by the nucleoplasmic concentration of Gsp1p-GTP, between Nup60p and Nup2p at the NPC.     

Influence of cargo size on Ran and energy requirements for nuclear protein import

Previous work has shown that the transport of some small protein cargoes through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) can occur in vitro in the absence of nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis. We now demonstrate that in the importin alpha/beta and transportin import pathways, efficient in vitro transport of large proteins, in contrast to smaller proteins, requires hydrolyzable GTP and the small GTPase Ran. Morphological and biochemical analysis indicates that the presence of Ran and GTP allows large cargo to efficiently cross central regions of the NPC. We further demonstrate that this function of RanGTP at least partly involves its direct binding to importin beta and transportin. We suggest that RanGTP functions in these pathways to promote the transport of large cargo by enhancing the ability of import complexes to traverse diffusionally restricted areas of the NPC.     

In vitro analysis of nuclear transport mediated by the C-terminal shuttle domain of Tap

The Tap protein of higher eukaryotes is implicated in the nuclear export of type D retroviral mRNA and some cellular mRNAs. Here we have developed an in vitro assay to study nuclear export mediated by the C-terminal shuttle domain of Tap involving the rapamycin-induced attachment of this transport domain to a nuclear green fluorescent protein-containing reporter. We found that export by the Tap transport domain does not involve cytosolic transport factors including the GTPase Ran. The transport domain directly binds to several nucleoporins positioned in different regions of the nuclear pore complex. These results argue that a direct interaction of the Tap transport domain with nucleoporins is responsible for its nucleocytoplasmic translocation. We found that the karyopherin beta-related export receptor CRM1 competes with the Tap transport domain for binding to Nup214 but not for binding to Nup62 or Nup153, suggesting that the Tap and CRM1 nuclear export pathways converge at the cytoplasmic periphery of the nuclear pore complex. Because the rates of in vitro nuclear import and export by the Tap transport domain are very similar, the directionality of mRNA export mediated by Tap probably is determined by mechanisms other than simple binding of the Tap transport domain to nucleoporins.     

Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import

Nuclear import and export signals on macromolecules mediate directional, receptor-driven transport through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) by a process that is suggested to involve the sequential binding of transport complexes to different nucleoporins. The directionality of transport appears to be partly determined by the nucleocytoplasmic compartmentalization of components of the Ran GTPase system. We have analyzed whether the asymmetric localization of discrete nucleoporins can also contribute to transport directionality. To this end, we have used quantitative solid phase binding analysis to determine the affinity of an importin beta cargo complex for Nup358, the Nup62 complex, and Nup153, which are in the cytoplasmic, central, and nucleoplasmic regions of the NPC, respectively. These nucleoporins are proposed to provide progressively more distal binding sites for importin beta during import. Our results indicate that the importin beta transport complex binds to nucleoporins with progressively increasing affinity as the complex moves from Nup358 to the Nup62 complex and to Nup153. Antibody inhibition studies support the possibility that importin beta moves from Nup358 to Nup153 via the Nup62 complex during import. These results indicate that nucleoporins themselves, as well as the nucleocytoplasmic compartmentalization of the Ran system, are likely to play an important role in conferring directionality to nuclear protein import.     

Transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.

Nuclear transport is an energy-dependent process mediated by saturable receptors. Import and export receptors are thought to recognize and bind to nuclear localization signals or nuclear export signals, respectively, in the transported molecules. The receptor-substrate interaction can be direct or mediated by an additional adapter protein. The transport receptors dock their cargoes to the nuclear pore complexes (NPC) and facilitate their translocation through the NPC. After delivering their cargoes, the receptors are recycled to initiate additional rounds of transport. Because a transport event for a cargo molecule is unidirectional, the transport receptors engage in asymmetric cycles of translocation across the NPC. The GTPase Ran acts as a molecular switch for receptor-cargo interaction and imparts directionality to the transport process. Recently, the combined use of different in vitro and in vivo approaches has led to the characterization of novel import and export signals and to the identification of the first nuclear import and export receptors.     

Exportin 4: a mediator of a novel nuclear export pathway in higher eukaryotes

Transport receptors of the importin beta superfamily account for many of the nuclear import and export events in eukaryotic cells. They mediate translocation through nuclear pore complexes, shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm and co-operate with the RanGTPase system to regulate their interactions with cargo molecules in a compartment-specific manner. We used affinity chromatography on immobilized RanGTP to isolate further candidate nuclear transport receptors and thereby identified exportin 4 as the most distant member of the importin beta family so far. Exportin 4 appears to be conserved amongst higher eukaryotes, but lacks obvious orthologues in yeast. It mediates nuclear export of eIF-5A (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A) and possibly that of other cargoes. The export signal in eIF-5A appears to be complex and to involve the hypusine modification that is unique to eIF-5A. We discuss possible cellular roles for nuclear export of eIF-5A.