检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的纤维膜条方法的建立及其在诊断中的应用

目的：建立以纤维膜为载体的检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的方法,检查病人血清中对梅毒螺旋体多种抗原的抗体,用于梅毒感染的诊断。方法：将基因工程表达及纯化的梅毒螺旋体蛋白tp15、tp17、tp42和tp47分别结合在纤维膜上,用载抗原的纤维膜条检查血清中的抗体,抗体阳性者在相应抗原位置显示出特异条带。结果：梅毒螺旋体感染者血清中存在特异性抗体,在检查的460份临床诊断的患者血清中,对tp15、tp17、tp42和tp47抗原的抗体检出率分别为41.3%、100%、98.7%和51.7%;134份献血员血清抗体阴性。结论：建立的检测梅毒螺旋体感染的方法可同时检查对多种抗原的抗体,以纤维膜条作为诊断条检测血清抗体方法简便,用于临床诊断更特异、更敏感。     

非梅毒螺旋体抗原血清学试验假阳性发生率及原因分析

目的分析非梅毒螺旋体抗原血清学试验假阳性发生率及原因。方法收集2018年1～12月我院门诊及住院患者3000例的送检血清标本进行梅毒甲苯胺红不加热血清试验(TRUST)和梅毒螺旋颗粒凝集试验(TPPA),并对试验结果进行分析。结果 3000例的血清标本中,TRUST假阳性率为0.53%(16/3000)。2018年上半年(1～6月份)TRUST试验假阳性率为0.62%(9/1452),2018年下半年(7～12月)TRUST试验假阳性率为0.45%(7/1548),上半年假阳性率略高于下半年,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。TRUST试验假阳性16例的血清标本中,系统性红斑狼疮2例,麻风病患者3例,皮肌炎2例,湿疹1例,孕妇1例,老年人1例,不明原因6例。结论 TRUST试验的假阳性时有发生,临床应高度重视;建议TRUST阳性者以TPPA等梅毒螺旋体抗原血清学试验进行确认。     

梧州口岸11330份血样梅毒血清学监测结果分析

目的了解１９９４～１９９７年１０月梧州口岸入出境人员梅毒感染情况。方法采用梅毒快速血浆反应素试验（ＲＰＲ）筛选,梅毒螺旋体血凝试验（ＴＰＨＡ）确证。结果１１３３０份检出梅毒血清阳性１６份,检出率１４１．２１／１０万。结论梅毒感染率呈逐年上升趋势,提示今后应加强口岸特定人群的监测,防止该病的扩散和蔓延。     

基因重组抗原检测梅毒螺旋体抗体研究

梅毒是一种传染性很强的性传播疾病,早期诊断是防止其传播及治疗的关键。采用基因重组的梅毒螺旋体P47和P15抗原对289份临床标本进行梅毒螺旋体抗体的检测,并与常规方法进行了比较,结果表明：重组抗原ELISA法具有较高的敏感性和特异性,并能对梅毒进行早期诊断,可以代替常规方法检测梅毒螺旋体抗体。186份现患和已治愈梅毒患者标本,重组抗原ELISA法、TPHA法和RPR法均为阳性;60份健康献血员标本,重组抗原ELISA法和TPHA法、RPR法均为阴性;17份与梅毒患者有性接触者的标本,重组抗原ELISA法有2份阳性,而TPHA法、RPR法均为阴性,1个月后复查这2份血清TPHA和RPR均为阳性;6份RPR和类风湿因子均为阳性的血清,重组抗原ELISA法和TPHA法均为阴性,;20份肝硬化患者血清,3种方法检测均为阴性。     

Reiter株研究现状

<正>在研究梅毒血清学密螺旋体试验时,如荧光抗体吸收试验(Fluoresoent Treponermal Antibody Absorption Test,简称FTA——ABS)、梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(Treponema pallidum Hemagglutination Assay简称TPHA)等,人们经常要使用两株重要的菌株即Nichols株和Reter株,前者为梅毒螺旋体毒株,在上述试验中做为抗原用以检测特异性梅毒抗体;后者则是非致病性螺旋体,为上述试验中吸收剂主要成分,以吸收除去被检血清中的非特异性抗体。     

早期先天梅毒几种实验室诊断方法的评价

目的评价梅毒螺旋体蛋白印迹试验(TPPA-IgM-WB)和梅毒螺旋体19(s)-IgM酶联免疫吸附法[TP-19(s)-IgM-ELISA]在先天梅毒早期诊断中的作用。方法对45例梅毒孕妇所产46例(1例双胞胎)新生儿运用血清IgM-WB试验、梅毒螺旋体19(s)-IgM酶联免疫吸附法[TP-19(s)-IgM-ELISA]和常规血清学方法(TPPA、RPR、FTA-ABS-IgM)检测,评价上述试验诊断方法在先天梅毒早期诊断中的作用。结果45例梅毒孕妇所生的新生儿中,按常规综合诊断方法21例确诊为先天梅毒,新生儿血清IgM蛋白印迹试验23例阳性,梅毒螺旋体19(s)-IgM酶联免疫吸附法24例阳性(21例常规方法诊断为先天梅毒)。30例作为对照的非梅毒孕妇及新生儿各项检查均为阴性。结论血清IgM蛋白印迹试验和梅毒螺旋体19(s)-IgM酶联免疫吸附法[TP-19(s)-IgM-ELISA]诊断先天梅毒具有较高的特异性和敏感性,结果显示可能高于现行的常规综合诊断方法的诊断价值。     

现用梅毒血清试验临床应用价值评估

通过检测梅毒患者正规治疗前、后血清抗体变化,评价梅毒实验室各种血清学试验方法对梅毒的诊断和随访的临床意义.本文采用梅毒螺旋体(TP)暗视野显微镜检查、快速血浆反应素(RPR)试验、TP明胶凝集试验(TPPA)和TP-IgM酶联免疫吸附试验(TP-IgM ELISA)等方法对135例梅毒患者正规治疗前、后的血清进行检测....     

严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)病人血清抗体水平的初步探讨

为了了解严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)病人血清中的抗体产生规律,对56份病人血清和36份健康人血清,分别采用间接酶联免疫吸附试验(EIA)检测IgG抗体和捕获法检测IgM抗体。结果显示：56份病人血清中有48份IgG抗体阳性,7份IgM抗体阳性。     

梅毒血清抗体检测与临床的关系分析

目的探讨梅毒血清抗体检测与临床的相关性。方法对我院10710例进行梅毒血清抗体检测者,根据性别、年龄的不同比较它们之间的关系,并进行分析结果判断与临床的相关性。结果不同性别患者梅毒血清抗体检测无显著性差异（P〉0.05）,而不同年龄患者梅毒血清抗体检测有显著性差异（P〈0.01）。结论由于患者自身原因、试剂原因及HIV感染等因素,造成梅毒血清抗体试验有一定的假阳性和假阴性,因此对梅毒血清抗体试验结果应结合病史及临床情况进行综合分析判断。     

脑脊液TP-ELISA、TRUST和VDRL检测对神经梅毒的诊断价值探讨

摘要：目的 探讨脑脊液梅毒螺旋体抗体酶联免疫法（TP-ELISA）、梅毒甲苯胺红不加热血清试验（TRUST）和性病研究实验室试验（venereal disease research laboratory,VDRL）对于神经梅毒的诊断价值。方法 对我院2011年7月至2014年7月三年内123例疑似神经梅毒患者的临床资料及脑脊液等进行综合分析并对三种方法检测神经梅毒的敏感性与特异性进行比较。结果 共诊断25例神经梅毒患者,其中1例抗-HIV阳性,24例抗-HIV阴性;有症状神经梅毒患者8例,无症状神经梅毒患者17例;有症状神经梅毒患者平均白细胞计数>5×106/L,异常率为62.50%;无症状神经梅毒患者平均白细胞计数<5×106/L,异常率为58.82%。有症状神经梅毒患者平均脑脊液蛋白>0.5 g/L,异常率为75.00%;无症状神经梅毒患者平均脑脊液蛋白<0.5 g/L,异常率为64.71%。TP-ELISA检测神经梅毒的敏感性与特异性分别为100% 和43.88%,TRUST检测神经梅毒的敏感性与特异性分别为96.94%和100%,VDRL检测神经梅毒的敏感性与特异性分别为100%和100%。结论 脑脊液TP-ELISA不可作为神经梅毒的确诊病例标准,脑脊液TRUST可以代替 VDRL用于神经梅毒的诊断,亦可作为其疗效的参考指标。     

明胶颗粒凝集试验联合ELISA法在梅毒检测中的应用价值

目的 分析明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)联合酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)在梅毒检测中的应用价值。 方法 选择我院2015年1月至2018年12月收治的128例疑似梅毒患者为研究对象,将其中43例临床确诊患者纳入梅毒组,余下85例为非梅毒组,全部受试者均接受ELISA法联合TPPA检测,比较单独ELISA法和ELISA联合TPPA检测的结果。 结果 梅毒组患者中ELISA法诊断阳性35例,阴性8例;ELISA联合TPPA诊断阳性42例,阴性1例;ELISA法假阳性率14.63%(6/41),明显高于ELISA联合TPPA法的2.33%(1/43),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.163,P=0.041)。ELISA联合TPPA诊断梅毒的特异性、敏感性、阴性预测值及阳性预测值分别为98.82%、97.67%、98.82%、97.67%,均显著高于单独ELISA检测的92.94%、81.40%、90.80%、85.37%,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=143.650、6.081、5.575、4.163,P结论 ELISA适用于大批量梅毒筛查,TPPA法的特异性及敏感性高,可作为梅毒血清抗体检测的确认试验。二者联合检测能够提高梅毒诊断效能,具有较高的应用价值。     

Immuno-PCR法诊断早期梅毒的方法学建立及其应用

目的建立Immuno-PCR法诊断早期梅毒的方法学,评价其灵敏度、特异性、重复性及其临床应用。方法利用基因重组TpN47抗原免疫新西兰兔,制备抗体并用Weston blotting检测;利用抗TpN47抗体作为捕获抗体与血清中TpN47抗原结合,通过链霉亲和素、生物素化抗体、生物素化DNA和PCR扩增等建立Immuno-PCR法检测梅毒螺旋体抗原TpN47体系;评价该方法的灵敏度、特异性和重复性;收集200例临床标本通过Immuno-PCR法、ELISA、TPPA和TURST法进行临床应用比较。结果 Weston blotting结果显示TpN47抗体阳性;Immuno-PCR比ELISA法敏感性强103倍,比TPPA、TURST强105倍;特异性高,重复性好。临床标本中Immuno-PCR法敏感性和特异性分别为86.00%（P〈0.05）和100.00%,ELISA法为71.00%和98.00%,TPPA法为65.00%和100.00%,TRUST法为68.00%和95.00%。结论 Immuno-PCR法检测梅毒螺旋体TpN47抗原敏感性高,特异性强,重复性好,可作为梅毒螺旋体感染的早期诊断方法 。     

An indirect hemagglutination antibody test to detect antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with Lyme disease

An indirect hemagglutination antibody (IHA) test was evaluated for its ability to detect borrelial antibodies in serum samples from patients with Lyme disease. The key test reagent developed for this antibody detection system was tannic acid-treated and glutaraldehyde-fixed sheep red blood cells (SRBC) containing Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antigens attached to the outer surface of the SRBC. In order to establish suitable cut-off titers, initial specificity and sensitivity measurements were made using sera from 100 anonymous healthy volunteers and 30 additional pre-determined samples known to be non-reactive or reactive for Lyme disease or syphilis. These results were compared with those obtained using a commercially available ELISA. At titers >/=64, the IHA test had a combined 98% specificity and 100% sensitivity for these 130 serum samples, 30 of which were known positives or negatives, whereas the ELISA was less specific (93%) and much less sensitive (80%). Subsequent testing was performed on sera from 65 patients with the erythema migrans (EM) rash and 20 patients with early disseminated (cardiac/neurologic) symptoms or with Lyme arthritis. At initial presentation, 46-48% of the EM patients had IHA reactivity, with titers >/=128, while 42% were positive in the ELISA. Follow-up testing performed on these EM patients, 8-12 days after receiving antibiotic treatment, revealed that Bb antibodies were detected best by the IHA test (83-86% reactive) relative to the ELISA (81% reactive). Bb antibodies were readily detectable on all of the serum samples from the early disseminated and late stage Lyme disease cases in both assay systems. Based on these results and because of its technical and interpretive simplicity, the IHA test should be considered as a useful and convenient alternative for the serological analysis of Bb infections.     

妊娠梅毒患者外周血中Th17和Treg细胞水平及其临床意义分析

目的:探讨妊娠梅毒患者外周血中Th17和Treg细胞水平及其临床意义。方法:选择2015年4月至2016年5月我院收治的35例妊娠梅毒患者作为观察组,并选择同期进行孕检的健康孕妇30例作为对照组。分析和比较其外周血Th17和Treg细胞水平及其诊断妊娠梅毒的临床价值。结果:观察组患者外周血Th17水平显著高于对照组,而外周血Treg水平显著低于对照组(P0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示外周血Th17和Treg水平与妊娠梅毒发病具有明显相关性。外周血Th17诊断妊娠梅毒的AUC为0.776,95%CI为0.656～0.896,外周血Treg诊断妊娠梅的ROC曲线下的面积(area under curve,AUC)为0.947,95%CI为0.897～997,Th17+Treg诊断妊娠梅毒的AUC为0.960,95%CI为0.913～1.000;Th17和Treg单独检测分别和联合检测曲线下面积比较均具有显著差异(Z=-2.807、-0.375,P0.05);Th17+Treg联合检测的特异度、准确度分别为91.73%、93.28%,显著高于各指标单独检测(P0.05)。结论:妊娠梅毒患者外周血Th17细胞增多,Treg细胞减少,联合检测外周血Th17和Treg细胞水平诊断妊娠梅毒具有较高的准确度,可作为诊断妊娠梅毒的重要参考指标。     

梅毒螺旋体重组抗原酶联免疫吸附试验的建立及应用

建立梅毒螺旋体重组抗原酶联免疫吸附试验（ELISA）,用于梅素血清学诊断和调查。其法,用表达的重组抗原IPN17和TmpA,建立检测血清特异抗体的间接ELISA,并与其它检测方法比较,分别检测梅毒参比血清、病人及献血员血清。其结果,敏感性、特异性均为100％。新建ELISA与TPHA的总符率为95．7％,明显高于RPR与TPHA的总符合率（89．1％）。献血员人群抗体阳性率为0．3％－0．69％,健康人群中抗体阳性率较低。     

Quantitative profile of cardiolipin and group treponemal IgD antibodies in syphilis estimated by single radial immunodiffusion technique (SRID)

150 serum samples (reactive in VDRL, Reiter-ELISA, FTA-Abs tests), from male patients 25-45 years old, in various stages of syphilis whether treated or untreated, were tested for IgD by SRID. On 154 sera from healthy males 25-45 years old, the reference normal values for IgD levels were established, as: 0-131.2 IU/ml with a mean of 29.92 +/- 29.61 IU/ml. Cardiolipin and group treponemal fraction values for IgD class were obtained by assessing the difference between the immunodiffusion diameter values produced by sera before and after complete absorption with VDRL antigen or delipidated T. reiteri suspension. The individual, mean +/- SD values (expressed in IU/ml) and the percentage of cardiolipin and treponemal IgD of the total IgD class were calculated for each stage. The mean value of the total IgD class, excepting secondary syphilis (sigma 2) 52.53 +/- 26.66 IU/ml), did not overstep the normal levels but all minimal individual values from syphilitic patients (7.09-14.89 IU/ml) surpassed significantly the normal minimal values which were less than or equal to 3.54 IU/ml. The total lack of cardiolipin (IgD and the presence of group treponemal IgD in all sera of the syphilis stages studied were manifest. The group treponemal IgD mean values ranged between 7-9 IU/ml, with a maximum of 19.32 +/- 10.58 IU/ml in sigma 2 followed by latent syphilis (sigma lat) with a mean value of 9.37 +/- 4.9 IU/ml. A significant percentage of treponemal IgD vs total IgD was recorded: primary syphilis (sigma 1) 32.01%, primary-secondary syphilis (sigma 1-2) 28.76%, sigma 2 36.77%, sigma lat and treated persistent seroreactive syphilis (sigma t+) 29.61%. The high proportion of treponemal IgD in latent and treated persistent reactive syphilis suggests a steady activation of B lymphocytes by treponemal antigens and presumably is an expression of an active infectious process. The absence of cardiolipin IgD and the presence of only the treponemal IgD, in all sera from all stages, might confer to their detection an extremely specific diagnostic value in syphilis.     

Preparations for serodiagnosis of diseases due to causative agents of ixodes tick-borne borreliosis (Lyme disease). Communication 3. Comparative study of enzyme immunoassay test-systems for detection of IgM to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato]

Three foreign and one Russian ELISA test-systems for detection of IgM to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato were comparatively studied with the use of the clinical material in an encoded experiment. In the foreign ELISA test-systems based on the use of native antigens of borrelia, cross reactions with sera from patients with syphilis, Epstein-Barr infection, cytomegalovirus infection and systemic lupus erythematosus were detected. The Russian recombinant ELISA test-system Borreliosis-ELISA-IgM showed high sensitivity and specificity. The simultaneous use of the test-systems for detecting IgG and IgM significantly increased the efficacy of diagnosis of early borreliosis.     

Comparison between inhibitory indirect ELISA and HPLC methods to quantify free and adducted aflatoxins in human urine

HPLC and Inhibitory Indirect ELISA (I.I. ELISA) methods for quantitation of aflatoxins (AF) in human urine were compared in terms of specificity, sensitivity, easiness and cost. I.I. ELISA was optimized in kind of antibody in use, type of plastic plate, adduct synthesis technique, peroxidase and antibody dilutions, etc. Both polyclonal (Cuban) and monoclonal (British) anti-AF antibodies were statistically studied and the process was standardized. HPLC and electrophoresis were performed while synthetizing AFB(1)-DNA and AFB(1)-Cl-Ovalbumin (AFB(1)-Cl-Ov) adducts. Costar polystyrene plate had the best adherence. Optimum coating dilution was 10 ng of AFB(1)-Cl-Ov per well. Dilutions of 1:1000 of monoclonal antibody from purified culture or 1:300 from monoclonal antibody from tissue culture and 1:1000 of peroxidase anti-mouse conjugate were the best. Optimum separation with HPLC was obtained isocratically with 60% MeOH and 40% distilled water mobile phase. ELISA had a sensitivity of 1 pg mL(-1) AFB(1) and HPLC sensitivity was 0.1 ng mL(-1) AFB(1) with fluorescence detector and 4.5 ng mL(-1) with UV detector. Monoclonal antibody gave more accurate results for determination of free and adducted AFB(1) in urine analysis.     

上海市某医院艾滋病合并梅毒病例特征分析及影响因素探讨

为了解近年来上海市艾滋病合并梅毒患者的特征及变化趋势,探讨艾滋病患者合并梅毒的影响因素,本研究收集了2013—2019年上海市(复旦大学附属)公共卫生临床中心(简称临床中心)诊断为艾滋病合并梅毒的病例作为研究对象。经详细查询研究对象的住院登记资料和病史,本文整理出用于研究的资料,并将研究对象分为艾滋病合并梅毒组和艾滋病不合并梅毒组。结果显示,临床中心艾滋病患者中有10.55%合并梅毒;2013—2019年临床中心艾滋病合并梅毒感染率总体呈上升趋势(χ2＝17.640,P<0.05),每年7—8月份为收治高峰期。患者主要来源于本地居民(占55.49%),男女性别比为14∶1,平均年龄为38±12岁。通过Logistic回归分析发现,影响艾滋病合并梅毒的因素有性别、年龄、病例来源和CD4^＋T细胞计数,其中本地来源、年龄在21～40岁、男性和CD4^＋T细胞计数≤500 /μL是艾滋病患者合并梅毒感染的高危因素。研究提示,上海市艾滋病合并梅毒感染病例数呈上升趋势,重点防控人群是上海市青壮年男性居民,应提高对此类人群的主动监测能力,加大筛查力度,做好健康教育;重点防控时间是每年7、8月份,应精准防控以期取得明显效果。本研究为上海市此类疾病防控提供了一定的科学依据。