The structure and regulation of Cullin 2 based E3 ubiquitin ligases and their biological functions

Background

Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes play a central role in targeting cellular proteins for ubiquitination-dependent protein turnover through 26S proteasome. Cullin-2 is a member of the Cullin family, and it serves as a scaffold protein for Elongin B and C, Rbx1 and various substrate recognition receptors to form E3 ubiquitin ligases.

Main body of the abstract

First, the composition, structure and the regulation of Cullin-2 based E3 ubiquitin ligases were introduced. Then the targets, the biological functions of complexes that use VHL, Lrr-1, Fem1b, Prame, Zyg-11, BAF250, Rack1 as substrate targeting subunits were described, and their involvement in diseases was discussed. A small molecule inhibitor of Cullins as a potential anti-cancer drug was introduced. Furthermore, proteins with VHL box that might bind to Cullin-2 were described. Finally, how different viral proteins form E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes with Cullin-2 to counter host viral defense were explained.

Conclusions

Cullin-2 based E3 ubiquitin ligases, using many different substrate recognition receptors, recognize a number of substrates and regulate their protein stability. These complexes play critical roles in biological processes and diseases such as cancer, germline differentiation and viral defense. Through the better understanding of their biology, we can devise and develop new therapeutic strategies to treat cancers, inherited diseases and viral infections.

     

Substrate receptors of proteasomes

Proteasomes are responsible for the turnover of most cellular proteins, and thus are critical to almost all cellular activities. A substrate entering the proteasome must first bind to a substrate receptor. Substrate receptors can be classified as ubiquitin receptors and non‐ubiquitin receptors. The intrinsic ubiquitin receptors, including proteasome regulatory particle base subunits 1, 10 and 13 (Rpn1, Rpn10, and Rpn13), determine the capability of the proteasome to recognize a ubiquitin chain, and thus provide selectivity for the 26S proteasome. However, the non‐ubiquitin receptors, including proteasome activator 200 (PA200) and PA28γ, have received great attention due to their remarkable compensatory roles relative to canonical ubiquitin‐mediated proteasomal degradation. Herein we review recent advances in understanding the contributions of these substrate receptors to proteasomal degradation, and introduce their substrates and interacting factors. We also provide insights into their biological functions related to spermatogenesis, immune responses, cellular homeostasis, and tumour development. Finally, we summarize advances in developing small‐molecule inhibitors of these substrate receptors and discuss their potential as drug targets.     

Niclosamide prevents the formation of large ubiquitin-containing aggregates caused by proteasome inhibition

Background

Protein aggregation is a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases and has been linked to the failure to degrade misfolded and damaged proteins. In the cell, aberrant proteins are degraded by the ubiquitin proteasome system that mainly targets short-lived proteins, or by the lysosomes that mostly clear long-lived and poorly soluble proteins. Both systems are interconnected and, in some instances, autophagy can redirect proteasome substrates to the lysosomes.

Principal Findings

To better understand the interplay between these two systems, we established a neuroblastoma cell population stably expressing the GFP-ubiquitin fusion protein. We show that inhibition of the proteasome leads to the formation of large ubiquitin-containing inclusions accompanied by lower solubility of the ubiquitin conjugates. Strikingly, the formation of the ubiquitin-containing aggregates does not require ectopic expression of disease-specific proteins. Moreover, formation of these focused inclusions caused by proteasome inhibition requires the lysine 63 (K63) of ubiquitin. We then assessed selected compounds that stimulate autophagy and found that the antihelmintic chemical niclosamide prevents large aggregate formation induced by proteasome inhibition, while the prototypical mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin had no apparent effect. Niclosamide also precludes the accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins and of p62 upon proteasome inhibition. Moreover, niclosamide induces a change in lysosome distribution in the cell that, in the absence of proteasome activity, may favor the uptake into lysosomes of ubiquitinated proteins before they form large aggregates.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that proteasome inhibition provokes the formation of large ubiquitin containing aggregates in tissue culture cells, even in the absence of disease specific proteins. Furthermore our study suggests that the autophagy-inducing compound niclosamide may promote the selective clearance of ubiquitinated proteins in the absence of proteasome activity.     

An in silico model of the ubiquitin-proteasome system that incorporates normal homeostasis and age-related decline

Background  

The ubiquitin-proteasome system is responsible for homeostatic degradation of intact protein substrates as well as the elimination of damaged or misfolded proteins that might otherwise aggregate. During ageing there is a decline in proteasome activity and an increase in aggregated proteins. Many neurodegenerative diseases are characterised by the presence of distinctive ubiquitin-positive inclusion bodies in affected regions of the brain. These inclusions consist of insoluble, unfolded, ubiquitinated polypeptides that fail to be targeted and degraded by the proteasome. We are using a systems biology approach to try and determine the primary event in the decline in proteolytic capacity with age and whether there is in fact a vicious cycle of inhibition, with accumulating aggregates further inhibiting proteolysis, prompting accumulation of aggregates and so on. A stochastic model of the ubiquitin-proteasome system has been developed using the Systems Biology Mark-up Language (SBML). Simulations are carried out on the BASIS (Biology of Ageing e-Science Integration and Simulation) system and the model output is compared to experimental data wherein levels of ubiquitin and ubiquitinated substrates are monitored in cultured cells under various conditions. The model can be used to predict the effects of different experimental procedures such as inhibition of the proteasome or shutting down the enzyme cascade responsible for ubiquitin conjugation.     

Bidirectional remodeling of β1-integrin adhesions during chemotropic regulation of nerve growth

Background

The proteasome is a multi-subunit protein machine that is the final destination for cellular proteins that have been marked for degradation via an ubiquitin (Ub) chain appendage. These ubiquitylated proteins either bind directly to the intrinsic proteasome ubiqutin chain receptors Rpn10, Rpn13, or Rpt5, or are shuttled to the proteasome by Rad23, Dsk2, or Ddi1. The latter proteins share an Ub association domain (UBA) for binding poly-Ub chains and an Ub-like-domain (UBL) for binding to the proteasome. It has been proposed that shuttling receptors dock on the proteasome via Rpn1, but the precise nature of the docking site remains poorly defined.

Results

To shed light on the recruitment of shuttling receptors to the proteasome, we performed both site-directed mutagenesis and genetic screening to identify mutations in Rpn1 that disrupt its binding to UBA-UBL proteins. Here we demonstrate that delivery of Ub conjugates and docking of Ddi1 (and to a lesser extent Dsk2) to the proteasome are strongly impaired by an aspartic acid to alanine point mutation in the highly-conserved D517 residue of Rpn1. Moreover, degradation of the Ddi1-dependent proteasome substrate, Ufo1, is blocked in rpn1-D517A yeast cells. By contrast, Rad23 recruitment to the proteasome is not affected by rpn1-D517A.

Conclusions

These studies provide insight into the mechanism by which the UBA-UBL protein Ddi1 is recruited to the proteasome to enable Ub-dependent degradation of its ligands. Our studies suggest that different UBA-UBL proteins are recruited to the proteasome by distinct mechanisms.     

Quantitative profiling of ubiquitylated proteins reveals proteasome substrates and the substrate repertoire influenced by the Rpn10 receptor pathway

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) comprises hundreds of different conjugation/deconjugation enzymes and multiple receptors that recognize ubiquitylated proteins. A formidable challenge to deciphering the biology of ubiquitin is to map the networks of substrates and ligands for components of the UPS. Several different receptors guide ubiquitylated substrates to the proteasome, and neither the basis for specificity nor the relative contribution of each pathway is known. To address how broad of a role the ubiquitin receptor Rpn10 (S5a) plays in turnover of proteasome substrates, we implemented a method to perform quantitative analysis of ubiquitin conjugates affinity-purified from experimentally perturbed and reference cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that were differentially labeled with 14N and 15N isotopes. Shotgun mass spectrometry coupled with relative quantification using metabolic labeling and statistical analysis based on q values revealed ubiquitylated proteins that increased or decreased in level in response to a particular treatment. We first identified over 225 candidate UPS substrates that accumulated as ubiquitin conjugates upon proteasome inhibition. To determine which of these proteins were influenced by Rpn10, we evaluated the ubiquitin conjugate proteomes in cells lacking either the entire Rpn10 (rpn10delta) (or only its UIM (ubiquitin-interacting motif) polyubiquitin-binding domain (uimdelta)). Twenty-seven percent of the UPS substrates accumulated as ubiquitylated species in rpn10delta cells, whereas only one-fifth as many accumulated in uimdelta cells. These findings underscore a broad role for Rpn10 in turnover of ubiquitylated substrates but a relatively modest role for its ubiquitin-binding UIM domain. This approach illustrates the feasibility of systems-level quantitative analysis to map enzyme-substrate networks in the UPS.     

System-wide Analysis Reveals Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Are Prone to Ubiquitylation after Misfolding Stress

Damaged and misfolded proteins that are no longer functional in the cell need to be eliminated. Failure to do so might lead to their accumulation and aggregation, a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases. Protein quality control pathways play a major role in the degradation of these proteins, which is mediated mainly by the ubiquitin proteasome system. Despite significant focus on identifying ubiquitin ligases involved in these pathways, along with their substrates, a systems-level understanding of these pathways has been lacking. For instance, as misfolded proteins are rapidly ubiquitylated, unconjugated ubiquitin is rapidly depleted from the cell upon misfolding stress; yet it is unknown whether certain targets compete more efficiently to be ubiquitylated. Using a system-wide approach, we applied statistical and computational methods to identify characteristics enriched among proteins that are further ubiquitylated after heat shock. We discovered that distinct populations of structured and, surprisingly, intrinsically disordered proteins are prone to ubiquitylation. Proteomic analysis revealed that abundant and highly structured proteins constitute the bulk of proteins in the low-solubility fraction after heat shock, but only a portion is ubiquitylated. In contrast, ubiquitylated, intrinsically disordered proteins are enriched in the low-solubility fraction after heat shock. These proteins have a very low abundance in the cell, are rarely encoded by essential genes, and are enriched in binding motifs. In additional experiments, we confirmed that several of the identified intrinsically disordered proteins were ubiquitylated after heat shock and demonstrated for two of them that their disordered regions are important for ubiquitylation after heat shock. We propose that intrinsically disordered regions may be recognized by the protein quality control machinery and thereby facilitate the ubiquitylation of proteins after heat shock.Cells face the constant threat of protein misfolding and aggregation, and thus protein quality control pathways are important in selectively targeting damaged and misfolded proteins for degradation (1, 2). The ubiquitin proteasome system serves as a major mediator of this pathway by conjugating the small protein ubiquitin onto substrates through the E1-E2-E3 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and ubiquitin ligase, respectively) cascade for their recognition and degradation by the proteasome (3, 4). It is known that the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system is associated with many neurodegenerative diseases. For instance, ubiquitin is found enriched in protein inclusions associated with these diseases (5). Furthermore, proteasome activity has been shown to decrease with age in a large variety of organisms (6), leading to increased proteotoxicity in the cell.Because of the importance of maintaining protein homeostasis, numerous ubiquitin ligases in different cellular compartments function in protein quality control pathways to target misfolded or damaged proteins for degradation via the proteasome. For instance, the conserved Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase is involved in the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation pathway that targets endoplasmic reticulum proteins for retro-translocation to the cytoplasm and proteasome degradation (7). A major question is what features are recognized by ubiquitin ligases that allow them to selectively target terminally misfolded proteins for degradation, given that the folding rates and physicochemical properties vary largely from protein to protein. Several E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in cytosolic protein quality control target their substrates via their interactions with chaperone proteins. For instance, the CHIP ubiquitin ligase can directly bind to Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins (8), which may hand over client proteins that are not successfully folded. Understanding which features are recognized by these degradation quality-control pathways might help us understand how certain misfolded proteins evade this system, leading to their accumulation and aggregation in the cell.Many studies investigating degradation protein quality control have employed model substrates (e.g. mutated proteins that misfold) to reveal which components are involved in a given quality control machinery. However, these approaches do not typically reveal the whole spectrum of substrates for these pathways. Thus, alternative system-wide approaches are also needed to provide a bigger picture. Heat shock (HS)¹ induces general misfolding at the proteome level by increasing thermal energy and was shown to cause an increase in ubiquitylation levels in the cell over 25 years ago (9, 10). However, the exact mechanism and pathways that target misfolded proteins have remained uncharacterized for a long time. We recently showed that the Hul5 ubiquitin ligase plays a major role in this heat stress response that mainly affects cytosolic proteins (11). Absence of Hul5 averts the ubiquitylation in the cytoplasm of several misfolded targets after HS, as well as low-solubility proteins in unstressed cells. Other E3 ubiquitin ligases are likely involved in this pathway (12). Interestingly, as ubiquitin constitutes about only 1% of the proteome, free unconjugated ubiquitin is rapidly depleted under stress conditions (13, 14). Given the limited amount of this protein, how does the cell triage ubiquitin among an excess of misfolded proteins? In order to gain systems-level insight, we sought to identify characteristics enriched among proteins ubiquitylated after HS using a combination of statistical and computational analysis, and we conducted additional proteomics and biochemical experiments to support our hypotheses. We discovered an unexpected susceptibility of intrinsically disordered proteins for ubiquitylation after misfolding stress.     

Quantitative analysis of global ubiquitination in HeLa cells by mass spectrometry

Ubiquitination regulates a host of cellular processes by labeling proteins for degradation, but also by functioning as a regulatory, nonproteolytic posttranslational modification. Proteome-wide strategies to monitor changes in ubiquitination profiles are important to obtain insight into the various cellular functions of ubiquitination. Here we describe generation of stable cell lines expressing a tandem hexahistidine-biotin tag (HB-tag) fused to ubiquitin for two-step purification of the ubiquitinated proteome under fully denaturing conditions. Using this approach we identified 669 ubiquitinated proteins from HeLa cells, including 44 precise ubiquitin attachment sites on substrates and all seven possible ubiquitin chain-linkage types. To probe the dynamics of ubiquitination in response to perturbation of the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway, we combined ubiquitin profiling with quantitative mass spectrometry using the stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) strategy. We compared untreated cells and cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 to identify ubiquitinated proteins that are targeted to the proteasome for degradation. A number of proteasome substrates were identified. In addition, the quantitative approach allowed us to compare proteasome targeting by different ubiquitin chain topologies in vivo. The tools and strategies described here can be applied to detect changes in ubiquitination dynamics in response to various changes in growth conditions and cellular stress and will contribute to our understanding of the ubiquitin/proteasome system.     

Puromycin-based vectors promote a ROS-dependent recruitment of PML to nuclear inclusions enriched with HSP70 and Proteasomes

Background  

Promyelocytic Leukemia (PML) protein can interact with a multitude of cellular factors and has been implicated in the regulation of various processes, including protein sequestration, cell cycle regulation and DNA damage responses. Previous studies reported that misfolded proteins or proteins containing polyglutamine tracts form aggregates with PML, chaperones, and components of the proteasome, supporting a role for PML in misfolded protein degradation.     

VWA domain of S5a restricts the ability to bind ubiquitin and Ubl to the 26S proteasome

The 26S proteasome recognizes a vast number of ubiquitin-dependent degradation signals linked to various substrates. This recognition is mediated mainly by the stoichiometric proteasomal resident ubiquitin receptors S5a and Rpn13, which harbor ubiquitin-binding domains. Regulatory steps in substrate binding, processing, and subsequent downstream proteolytic events by these receptors are poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that mammalian S5a is present in proteasome-bound and free states. S5a is required for efficient proteasomal degradation of polyubiquitinated substrates and the recruitment of ubiquitin-like (Ubl) harboring proteins; however, S5a-mediated ubiquitin and Ubl binding occurs only on the proteasome itself. We identify the VWA domain of S5a as a domain that limits ubiquitin and Ubl binding to occur only upon proteasomal association. Multiubiquitination events within the VWA domain can further regulate S5a association. Our results provide a molecular explanation to how ubiquitin and Ubl binding to S5a is restricted to the 26S proteasome.     

Znf179 E3 ligase-mediated TDP-43 polyubiquitination is involved in TDP-43- ubiquitinated inclusions (UBI) (+)-related neurodegenerative pathology

Background

The brain predominantly expressed RING finger protein, Znf179, is known to be important for embryonic neuronal differentiation during brain development. Downregulation of Znf179 has been observed in motor neurons of adult mouse models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), yet the molecular function of Znf179 in neurodegeneration has never been previously described. Znf179 contains the classical C3HC4 RING finger domain, and numerous proteins containing C3HC4 RING finger domain act as E3 ubiquitin ligases. Hence, we are interested to identify whether Znf179 possesses E3 ligase activity and its role in ALS neuropathy.

Methods

We used in vivo and in vitro ubiquitination assay to examine the E3 ligase autoubiquitination activity of Znf179 and its effect on 26S proteasome activity. To search for the candidate substrates of Znf179, we immunoprecipitated Znf179 and subjected to mass spectrometry (MS) analysis to identify its interacting proteins. We found that ALS/ FTLD-U (frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with ubiquitin inclusions)-related neurodegenerative TDP-43 protein is the E3 ligase substrate of Znf179. To further clarify the role of E3 ubiquitin ligase Znf179 in neurodegenerative TDP-43-UBI (ubiquitinated inclusions) (+) proteinopathy, the effect of Znf179-mediated TDP-43 polyubiquitination on TDP-43 protein stability, aggregate formation and nucleus/cytoplasm mislocalization were evaluated in vitro cell culture system and in vivo animal model.

Results

Here we report that Znf179 is a RING E3 ubiquitin ligase which possesses autoubiquitination feature and regulates 26S proteasome activity through modulating the protein expression levels of 19S/20S proteasome subunits. Our immunoprecipitation assay and MS analysis results revealed that the neuropathological TDP-43 protein is one of its E3 ligase substrate. Znf179 interactes with TDP-43 protein and mediates polyubiquitination of TDP-43 in vitro and in vivo. In neurodegenerative TDP-43 proteinopathy, we found that Znf179-mediated polyubiquitination of TDP-43 accelerates its protein turnover rate and attenuates insoluble pathologic TDP-43 aggregates, while knockout of Znf179 in mouse brain results in accumulation of insoluble TDP-43 and cytosolic TDP-43 inclusions in cortex, hippocampus and midbrain regions.

Conclusions

Here we unveil the important role for the novel E3 ligase Znf179 in TDP-43-mediated neuropathy, and provide a potential therapeutic strategy for combating ALS/ FTLD-U neurodegenerative pathologies.

     

Engagement of ubiquitination and de-ubiquitination at rostral ventrolateral medulla in experimental brain death

Background

Whereas brain death is a vitally important clinical phenomenon, our contemporary understanding on its underlying cellular mechanisms remains elusive. This study evaluated whether the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), a neural substrate that our laboratory identified previously to be intimately related to brain death, is engaged in this fatal process.

Methods

We performed proteomics, Western Blot, real-time PCR, ELISA and pharmacological experiments in conjunction with a clinically relevant experimental endotoxemia model of brain death based on intravenous administration of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide in adult male Sprague–Dawley rats.

Results

Proteomics, Western blot and enzyme activity analyses demonstrated that polyubiquitination was preserved and de-ubiquitination by ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase isozyme-L1 (UCH-L1) was sustained, alongside increased monoubiquitin availability or proteasome activity in RVLM over the course of experimental endotoxemia. However, real-time PCR revealed no significant alteration in proteasome subunit alpha type-1, ubiquitin or UCH-L1 at mRNA level. Functionally, whereas microinjection into the bilateral RVLM of proteasome inhibitors (lactacystin or proteasome inhibitor II) potentiated survival, an inhibitor of ubiquitin-recycling (ubiquitin aldehyde) or an UCH-L1 inhibitor exacerbated mortality.

Conclusions

We proposed previously that the progression towards brain death entails a tug-of-war between pro-death and pro-life programs in RVLM. It is conceivable that ubiquitination or de-ubiquitination in RVLM participate in brain death by regulating the degradation of the proteins involved in those programs.     

APC-targeted RAAI degradation mediates the cell cycle and root development in plants

Protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is necessary for a normal cell cycle. As compared with knowledge of the mechanism in animals and yeast, that in plants is less known. Here we summarize research into the regulatory mechanism of protein degradation in the cell cycle in plants. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC), in the E3 family of enzymes, plays an important role in maintaining normal mitosis. APC activation and substrate specificity is determined by its activators, which can recognize the destruction box (D-box) in APC target proteins. Oryza sativa root architecture-associated I (OsRAA1) with GTP-binding activity was originally cloned from rice. Overexpression of of OsRAA1 inhibits the growth of primary roots in rice. Knockdown lines showed reduced height of seedlings because of abnormal cell division. OsRAA1 transgenic rice and fission yeast show a higher proportion of metaphase cells than that of controls, which suggests a blocked transition from metaphase to anaphase during mitosis. OsRAA1 co-localizes with spindle tubulin. It contains the D-box motif and interacts with OsRPT4 of the regulatory particle of 26S proteasome. OsRAA1 may be a cell cycle inhibitor that can be degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and its disruption is necessary for the transition from metaphase to anaphase during root growth in rice.Key words: cell cycle, APC, RAA1, rice, protein degradationProtein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is necessary for the normal cell cycle. The activation of 3 enzymes, E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme), E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme) and E3 (ubiquitin ligase), are required for the addition of ubiquitin molecules to the target protein. E1 catalyzes the formation of the thiol-ester bond between C-terminal glycine in ubiquitin and cysteine in E1, and activated ubiquitin is transferred to a cysteine in E2. With the help of an E3, ubiquitin is linked to the lysine in the target protein. Subsequent ubiquitins can be attached to the previously bound ubiquitin because of the seven lysine residues in the ubiquitin molecule. Finally, the ubiquitinated substrates are degraded by the 26S proteasome.E3 confers substrate specificity. E3 ubiquitin ligases comprise a large and diverse family of proteins or protein complexes. E3s are of two classes: homology to E6-AP carboxy terminus-containing proteins, and RING-finger domain-containing proteins. The RING-finger E3s have 4 subgroups: single subunit RING E3, VCB-Cul2 complex (VBC), Skp1/Cullin/F-box protein (SCF) and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C).¹ The SCF ligases regulate the transition from G₁/S and G₂/M, and APC is required for mitosis. Many APC substrates have been identified in animals.² The polyubiquitinated substrates can be recognized by different ubiquitin receptors and degraded via 26S proteasome.^3,4 However, little is known about APC substrates in plants.     

Analysis of ubiquitination in vivo using a transgenic mouse model

The primary pathway for the proteolytic destruction of cellular proteins is through ubiquitin-mediated targeting to the proteasome. This pathway is pivotal not only in the elimination of damaged or misfolded proteins but also in the temporal, developmental, or signal-mediated destruction of normal cellular substrates. The list of known substrates of the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway is long, but most substrates have been identified in yeast or, more recently, in cultured mammalian cells. It is likely that many mammalian substrates with developmental or disease relevance have yet to be identified because their ubiquitination occurs in tissue or organ systems that cannot be adequately modeled in vitro. We have developed a transgenic mouse model that will allow the isolation and identification of these substrates. The human UbC promoter was used to drive expression of a hexahistidine-tagged version of human ubiquitin in a variety of mouse tissues from early embryonic stages, as assessed by a green fluorescent protein marker. Cleavage of the fusion protein by endogenous enzymes produced epitope-tagged ubiquitin that was detected both in monomeric form and conjugated to cellular proteins. This mouse model should facilitate in the analysis of normal and disease-related ubiquitination events in vivo.     

Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines

Recent work has shown that ubiquitination leads to recognition of target proteins by diverse ubiquitin receptors. One family of receptors delivers the ubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome resulting in ATP-dependent substrate unfolding and proteolysis. A related family of ubiquitin-binding proteins seems to recruit ubiquitinated proteins to Cdc48, an ATPase ring complex that can also unfold proteins. Some targets seem to dock at Cdc48 before the proteasome does, in an ordered pathway. The intimate interplay between the proteasome and Cdc48, mediated in part by loosely associated ubiquitin receptors, has important functions in cellular regulation.     

In vivo relevance of substrate recognition function of major Arabidopsis ubiquitin receptors

Ubiquitylation marks proteins for destruction by the 26S proteasome. These signals are deciphered and targeted by distinct direct and indirect pathways involving a set of evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin receptors. Although biochemical and structural studies have revealed the mechanistic complexity of these substrate recognition pathways, conclusive evidence of the in vivo relevance of their substrate recognition function is currently not available. We recently showed that the structural elements involved in substrate recognition are not responsible for the important roles of the ubiquitin receptor RPN10 in vegetative and reproductive growth or for the abundance of the two-capped proteasomes (RP2-CP). Moreover, Arabidopsis plants subjected to severe knockdown or knockout any of the major ubiquitin receptors displayed wild-type phenotypes. Our results clearly suggest a functional redundancy of the major Arabidopsis ubiquitin receptors, and this evolved multiplicity is probably used to secure the substrates delivery. Based on the reduced abundance of RP2-CP in rpn10-2 and a role of RPN10 in lid-base association, a structural role of RPN10 in 26S proteasome stability is likely to be more relevant in vivo. Further efforts using structural and functional analyses in higher-order mutants to identify the specific biological functions of substrate recognition for the major Arabidopsis ubiquitin receptors are described here.     

Angelman syndrome-associated ubiquitin ligase UBE3A/E6AP mutants interfere with the proteolytic activity of the proteasome

Angelman syndrome, a severe neurodevelopmental disease, occurs primarily due to genetic defects, which cause lack of expression or mutations in the wild-type E6AP/UBE3A protein. A proportion of the Angelman syndrome patients bear UBE3A point mutations, which do not interfere with the expression of the full-length protein, however, these individuals still develop physiological conditions of the disease. Interestingly, most of these mutations are catalytically defective, thereby indicating the importance of UBE3A enzymatic activity role in the Angelman syndrome pathology. In this study, we show that Angelman syndrome-associated mutants interact strongly with the proteasome via the S5a proteasomal subunit, resulting in an overall inhibitory effect on the proteolytic activity of the proteasome. Our results suggest that mutated catalytically inactive forms of UBE3A may cause defects in overall proteasome function, which could have an important role in the Angelman syndrome pathology.Ubiquitination is a highly specific process that involves a group of proteins responsible for adding ubiquitin molecules to cellular substrates, thereby resulting in the modulation of numerous cellular pathways.¹ The deregulation of components of the ubiquitin conjugation system causes defects in many cellular functions and these have been associated with human pathogenesis.² Of the components involved in the ubiquitin cascade, the E3 ubiquitin ligases provide the substrate specificity. By attaching ubiquitin molecules to their substrates, E3 ligases have direct control over the functions and, in many cases, protein turnover of these substrates. In addition, loss of function in a number of E3 enzymes has been shown to have an important role in the development of severe physiological conditions such as certain cancers and neurological disorders.³ A representative instance of the latter is Angelman syndrome (AS), a severe neurodevelopmental disorder, with clinical features of mental retardation, developmental delay, ataxia and epilepsy.^{4, 5} The principal protein affected in AS is the E3 ubiquitin ligase E6-associated protein (E6AP/UBE3A), the gene being found on chromosome 15q11-13. UBE3A was initially identified as an interacting partner of high-risk HPV-16 and -18 E6 oncoproteins,^{6, 7} but was subsequently found to be linked to the development of AS. AS develops mainly due to genetic defects that lead to the loss of expression of the maternal allele of the UBE3A gene in the hypothalamus.^{8, 9} Between 65 and 75% of AS patients have been diagnosed with the deletions of 15q11-13, 3–7% of patients show uniparental disomy and ~3% of cases have been found with imprinting defects, such that the functionally defective maternal copy of the gene is expressed in the brain.⁵ In addition, there are also 5–11% of individuals with AS whose sequence analyses show UBE3A mutations. Most of these have in-frame deletions that would be predicted to result in protein truncations,^{10, 11} but a number of those patients have milder mutations, such as point mutations, that do not affect the expression of the full-length protein.^{12, 13} The majority of these mutations however are defective in ubiquitin ligase activity, indicating that the loss of enzymatic activity of UBE3A is important in promoting the development of AS.¹⁴Studies have demonstrated that ubiquitin ligase activity of UBE3A has a role in the proteasome-dependent degradation of several cellular substrates, and it can be reasoned that defects in the regulation of some of these substrates can contribute to AS development. However, although a number of UBE3A target proteins have been identified, including Sox9, C/EBPα, α-Synuclein, p27, promyelocytic leukemia (PML) tumor suppressor, annexin A1, amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) and HHR23A,^{15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22} characterization of their interactions with UBE3A have only partially contributed to an understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind the development of AS pathology. In addition, UBE3A has also been shown to interact with other components of the proteasome degradatory pathway, including the ubiquitin ligases HERC2, Ring1B and EDD,^{23, 24, 25} and recent studies demonstrated a direct interaction between UBE3A and the proteasome itself.^{26, 27} Whether any of these interactions might also be involved in AS development is an open question. Thus, although many proteins are known to be targeted by UBE3A for proteasomal degradation, much less is known about UBE3A interactions with the proteasome itself, or how these interactions might affect substrate turnover, or whether perturbations in this association can contribute to AS development.The 26S proteasome is a complex cellular machine that contains a 20S central core, a hollow tube composed of multiple proteasome subunits, which contain proteolytic sites. On each end of the 20S proteolytic core, there is an ATP-dependent 19S regulatory particle, which is involved in capturing the ubiquitinated proteins.²⁸ Among several subunits that are part of the 19S regulatory particle complex, there are two major ubiquitin receptors, Rpn10/S5a and Rpn13.^{29, 30, 31} The S5a subunit mediates the targeting of ubiquitin substrates to the proteasome by binding ubiquitin conjugates through a ubiquitin-interacting motif (UIM)³² and loss of this activity of S5a results in decreased proteolytic activity of the proteasome.^{33, 34, 35} It has also been shown that S5a is regulated by mono-ubiquitination, which inhibits its ability to interact with ubiquitin-conjugated substrates, and also leads to decreased proteasome activity.³¹ Recent studies have shown that UBE3A can directly ubiquitinate the S5a subunit, and that its Drosophila ortholog, Ube3a, mediates ubiquitination of the Drosophila S5a homolog, resulting in its subsequent degradation.^{26, 27} Structural studies have indicated that a number of AS-associated UBE3A point mutations occur in the HECT domain, which most likely lead to the expression of catalytically defective proteins.^{13, 14} We were therefore interested in investigating whether catalytically defective AS-associated point mutants can still interact with the S5a subunit and, furthermore, in determining whether they can exert any inhibitory effects on the proteasomal turnover of ubiquitinated substrates. We show here that AS-associated UBE3A mutants interact more strongly with S5a, with one of the consequences being a general inhibitory effect on the overall proteolytic activity of the proteasome. These results suggest that perturbation of overall proteasome function may be an important element in the development of AS, which thus shows many similarities with other proteasomal neurogical defects.