ARIMIDEX: a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor for the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Aromatase inhibitors have been available for a number of years and their ability to reduce circulating estradiol levels has been shown to produce clinical benefit in women with advanced breast cancer. Until recently, the only commercially available aromatase inhibitor was aminoglutethimide. Although aminoglutethimide has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, it does cause significant toxicity and requires the use of concomitant hydrocortisone therapy. Anastrozole is one of a new class of potent aromatase inhibitors able to suppress estradiol to the limit of detection of sensitive assays without suppressing adrenal steroidal synthesis. Two large clinical trials (n = 764) conducted in the U.S.A. and in Europe evaluated two doses of anastrozole, 1 and 10 mg a day, compared to megesterol acetate, 40 mg four times a day, in postmenopausal women who had progressed while on tamoxifen. Response rates and time to progression with anastrozole were similar to those of megesterol acetate. Objective responses (CR + PR) were 10.3%, 8.9% and 7.9% in the 1 and 10 mg of anastrozole and megesterol acetate treatment groups, respectively. Another 25.2%, 22.6% and 26.1% had stable disease for over 24 weeks on 1, 10 mg anastrozole and megesterol acetate, respectively. Anastrozole and megesterol acetate were well tolerated; however, more patients had significant weight gain on megesterol acetate than with anastrozole treatment. The weight gain seen with megesterol acetate continued to increase over time. Anastrozole has a better therapeutic index (fewer side-effects) and has recently been approved by the FDA and a number of other regulatory agencies around the world for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

Fadrozole hydrochloride, a new nontoxic aromatase inhibitor for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Eighty previously treated postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive fadrozole (CGS 16 949A), a new aromatase inhibitor, 1 or 4 mg orally per day. Seventy eight patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only mild to moderate toxicity, namely hot flushes (28%), nausea and vomiting (13%), fatigue (8%) and loss of appetite (5%) occurred. Complete response was documented in 10% and partial response in 13% of patients with 45% having a no change status for at least 2 months. The median time to treatment failure is 4.1 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The response and survival in patients with estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor unknown disease were not significantly different. Neither response nor survival was significantly different between the patients receiving 1 or 4 mg of fadrozole per day. Fadrozole is a well tolerated, effective second line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.     

Clinical,pathological, proliferative and molecular responses associated with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment in breast cancer

Neoadjuvant treatment provides an exceptional setting in which to monitor clinical, pathological, proliferative and molecular responses to aromatase inhibitors. Sequential measurements of the primary tumour provide an accurate assessment of clinical changes and the relatively easy access to the tumour within the breast means that biopsies are available for histological and molecular measurements before and during treatment. Large randomised trials (P024 and IMPACT) together with informative non-randomised studies have demonstrated clinical responses to third generation aromatase inhibitors in 40–70% of ER-positive tumours, rates generally significantly higher than observed with tamoxifen. Pathological responses in terms of reduced cellularity/increased fibrosis are also seen in 65–75% of cases. Whilst these are more often seen in clinically responding tumours, the correlation between clinical and pathological response is not absolute. A marked feature of treatment with third generation inhibitors is a reduction in cellular proliferation. Using Ki67 as a marker, this may be observed as early as 10–14 days into treatment. Reduction in proliferation with treatment may be seen in both clinically responding and non-responding tumours, although incidence and degree of effect are higher in responding cases. Aromatase inhibitor treatment frequently fails to reduce proliferation in tumours over-expressing HER-2. In terms of molecular events, aromatase inhibitor treatment is associated with changes in expression of genes classically associated with oestrogen regulation (KIAA0101, ZWINT, IRS1 and TFF1) and cell cycle progression, most notably mitotic phase proteins (CDC2, CCNB1 and CKS2). Changes occur both in clinically responding and non-responding tumours. Although expression of no individual gene correlates absolutely with response status, expression signatures can be produced which distinguish between responding and non-responding tumours. In terms of gene ontology, terms relating to macro-molecular biosynthesis, translation and structural components of ribosomes are significantly enriched. Finally, molecular signatures can be used to illustrate the relative homogeneity of responding tumours and the disparate nature of non-responding tumours suggesting multiple and diverse pathways associated with resistance.     

Clinical development of aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer

Numerous aromatase inhibitors are under development for breast cancer treatment. The major aims are to obtain a drug which at its dose of maximum efficacy has no effect on other endocrine systems, has no clinical side-effects and its convenient to administer. During the early clinical stages of development detailed endocrine and pharmacokinetic analyses are a valuable aid in the establishment of a drug's selectivity and its optimum dose, route and frequency of administration. The optimal dose may be defined as the minimum that will achieve maximal and sustained suppression of aromatase activity. This has generally been measured indirectly by comparing the suppression of plasma oestrogen levels at a selection of dosages. This approach has major advantages in speeding dose selection for therapeutic clinical trials. However, it also has some disadvantages including the unproven assumption that clinical response has a direct relationship with the degree of oestrogen suppression. In addition there are technical difficulties of analysis, of wide variability in endocrine response between patients and of demonstrating oestrogen suppression to be equivalent between doses (necessary to show maximal suppression). The direct measurement of aromatase inhibition in vivo by isotopic infusion analysis provides support to these indirect estimates. Its value is shown by our recent results with CGS16949A. The additional value of collating pharmacokinetic and endocrine measurements is apparent from our investigations of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) and pyridoglutethimide. A consideration of our experience with these inhibitors may be helpful in directing the development of future agents.

Whilst the value of aromatase inhibition in breast cancer is established its value in prostatic cancer is in doubt: we have found that 4-OHA is only poorly efficacious in advanced prostatic cancer.     

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Estrogens are known to be important in the growth of breast cancers in both pre and postmenopausal women. As the number of breast cancer patients increases with age, the majority of breast cancer patients are postmenopausal women. Although estrogens are no longer made in the ovaries after menopause, peripheral tissues produce sufficient concentrations to stimulate tumor growth. As aromatase catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of estrogen, inhibitors of this enzyme are effective targeted therapy for breast cancer. Three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now FDA approved and have been shown to be more effective than the antiestrogen tamoxifen and are well tolerated. AIs are now a standard treatment for postmenopausal patients. AIs are effective in adjuvant and first-line metastatic setting. This review describes the development of AIs and their current use in breast cancer. Recent research focuses on elucidating mechanisms of acquired resistance that may develop in some patients with long term AI treatment and also in innate resistance. Preclinical data in resistance models demonstrated that the crosstalk between ER and other signaling pathways particularly MAPK and PI3K/Akt is an important resistant mechanism. Blockade of these other signaling pathways is an attractive strategy to circumvent the resistance to AI therapy in breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of these novel targeted therapies to reverse resistance to AIs. Article from the special issue on 'Targeted Inhibitors'.     

Growth suppression of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells by aromatase inhibitors: A new system for aromatase inhibitor screening

In our previous study we found that MCF-7 cells possess aromatase activity and stimulate estrogen receptor-mediated growth. The pathways through which androgens are converted to estrogens by aromatase and estrogens interact with estrogen receptors contribute significantly to growth stimulation. The administration of aromatase inhibitor results in suppression of growth stimulation by androgens. This system enabled us to assess directly the biological activities of aromatase inhibitors. Aromatase activity was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the addition of aminoglutethimide and CGS 16949A, competitive inhibitors, and of 14-hydroxy-4-androstene-3,6,17-trione and 4-hydroxy-androstenedione, mechanism-based inhibitors. After preincubation with mechanism-based inhibitors, aromatase activity was significantly suppressed, whereas after preincubation with competitive inhibitors, it was adversely increased. These effects were concentration- and time-dependent. Preincubation with competitive inhibitors resulted in augmentation of subsequent androgen stimulation of thymidine incorporation, while preincubation with mechanism-based inhibitors resulted in diminished stimulation by subsequent androgen administration. These results suggest that in MCF-7 cells competitive inhibitors adversely induce aromatase and accelerate the subsequent androgen stimulation of DNA synthesis. Suicide inhibitors are more effective than competitive inhibitors. This system will be useful for aromatase inhibitor screening.     

Adaptive hypersensitivity to estrogen: mechanisms and clinical relevance to aromatase inhibitor therapy in breast cancer treatment

Breast tumors in women can adapt to endocrine deprivation therapy by developing hypersensitivity to estradiol. For this reason, aromatase inhibitors can be effective in women relapsing after treatment with tamoxifen or following oophorectomy. To understand the mechanisms responsible, we examined estrogenic stimulation of cell proliferation in a model system and provided in vitro and in vivo evidence that long-term estradiol deprivation (LTED) causes “adaptive hypersensitivity”. The primary mechanisms responsible involve up-regulation of ER as well as the MAP kinase, PI-3 kinase, and mTOR growth factor pathways. ER is 4–10-fold up-regulated and co-opts a classical growth factor pathway using Shc, Grb2, and Sos. This induces rapid non-genomic effects which are enhanced in LTED cells. Estradiol binds to cell membrane associated ER, physically associates with the adaptor protein Shc, and induces its phosphorylation. In turn, Shc binds Grb2 and Sos which result in the rapid activation of MAP kinase. These non-genomic effects of estradiol produce biologic effects as evidenced by Elk activation and by morphologic changes in cell membranes. Additional effects include activation of PI-3 kinase and mTOR pathways through estradiol induced binding of ER to the IGF-1 and EGF receptors. Further proof of the non-genomic effects of estradiol involved use of “designer” cells which selectively express ER in nucleus, cytosol, and cell membrane. We have used a new downstream inhibitor of these pathways, farnesyl-thio-salicylic acid (FTS), to block proliferation in hypersensitive cells as a model for a potentially effective strategy for treatment of patients.     

Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

The aim of endocrine therapy is to reduce the estrogenic stimulus for tumour growth. After failure of tamoxifen — the standard “first-line” hormonotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC) — the most frequently prescribed endocrine therapies are progestins and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (“second-line” hormonotherapy). Estrogen deprivation through AIs provides effective treatment of hormone-dependent ABC in postmenopausal (PMP) women. Over the past few years, the goals of our research programme were to develop more potent, more selective and better tolerated AIs than our first AI, aminoglutethimide (AG). Lentaron® (4-hydroxyandrostenedione, formestane), a highly selective steroidal compound was the first of the new AIs to be used in clinical trials. It is a substrate analogue, administered as an i.m. injection every 2 weeks. It is effective in the treatment of ABC with an objective response rate (ORR) similar to tamoxifen and megestrol acetate (MA) and is generally well tolerated; rare instances of injection site reactions have been reported. Afema® (fadrozole HCl), a non-steroidal AI is active orally, and effectively suppresses estrogen levels in PMP women, but it is not completely selective for aromatase when administered at higher than therapeutic doses. At the therapeutic dose of 1 mg twice a day it has an anti-tumour efficacy similar to MA, a good tolerability and no clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system. Letrozole is the fourth of our AIs in clinical development. It is a non-steroidal, achiral, orally active, potent and highly selective competitive AI. Clinical endocrine studies have shown that the dose of 0.5 mg a day is the lowest dose achieving maximum estrogen suppression. Over a wide dose range, a lack of clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system has confirmed its high selectivity. In four phase Ib/IIa studies in PMP patients with ABC who failed previous therapy, letrozole produced ORRs of 9, 31, 33 and 36%. One phase IIb/III study has been completed and two others are ongoing, comparing two doses of letrozole with MA or AG to confirm the anti-tumour efficacy of letrozole in the treatment of ABC in PMP women after treatment with anti-estrogens. Preliminary results from the completed trial show that letrozole 2.5 mg is superior to 0.5 mg in terms of ORR, time to progression and time to treatment failure, and is superior to the standard dose of MA in terms of ORR and tolerability. Therefore letrozole 2.5 mg can be recommended as a first choice for the treatment of PMP patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown ABC after anti-estrogen therapy.     

RU 486: how abortion politics have impacted on a potentially useful drug of broad medical application.

RU-486 or mifepristone is best known as an antiprogestin and an abortifacient, but it has broad medical applicability. The drug is also a potent blocker of corticosteroid receptors, and it has shown promise in the treatment of breast cancer, inoperable meningioma, and cushing's disease. Cushing's is a model for the symptomatology of aging which may involve enhanced response to corticosteroid. RU-486 has reversed the osteoporosis, thinning of skin, muscle atrophy, obesity, adult onset diabetes, depression, hypertension, and immunosuppression associated with this disease. RU-486 may be of value in aiding cervical dilation, lactation, and the treatment of endometriosis. In addition, breast, bowel, kidney tumors, hepatomas, endometrial cancer, and fibrosarcomas can show corticosteroid dependency, suggesting that RU-486 may have clinical value against inoperable tumors. In a preliminary 1987 phase I study, in estrogen-positive, chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer patients in Montpelier, France, Ru-486 produced objective tumor regression (6 of 22) that was prolonged (3 months) in 4 patients. Clinical relief of bone pain was observed in 7 of 23 patients with a decline in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tumor makers in 8 patients. Growing in vitro data also show that RU-486 can directly inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation. RU-486 has application for HIV infection, based on data that there is a serum factor in AIDS patients that enhances corticosteroid lympholysis. IN addition, the immune restorative action of RU-486 suggests that it could counteract the immunosuppression seen in aging, in cancer, or in viral or stress-related disease, which has recently focused clinical attention on its potential in the treatment of senile dementia and depression. Scientific conferences and workshops are needed to alert scientists, physicians, and the public to the potential medical benefits of this drug.     

Lead optimization of COX-2 inhibitor nimesulide analogs to overcome aromatase inhibitor resistance in breast cancer cells

A series of COX-2 selective inhibitor nimesulide derivatives were synthesized. Their anti-cell proliferation activities were evaluated with a long-term estrogen deprived MCF-7aro (LTEDaro) breast cancer cell line, which is the biological model of aromatase inhibitor resistance for hormone-dependent breast cancer. Compared to nimesulide which inhibited LTEDaro cell proliferation with an IC₅₀ at 170.30 μM, several new compounds showed IC₅₀ close to 1.0 μM.     

Future uses for aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer

Over recent years highly potent, well-tolerated aromatase inhibitors have been developed, which essentially obliterate peripheral aromatase activity in postmenopausal women. Their role as the optimal second-line agents (post-tamoxifen) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer has recently been established in large comparative clinical trials. Their testing as adjuvant therapy is warranted, but their eventual application in this (or the prophylactic) setting will be dependent on the currently unknown effects of profound oestrogen deprivation on the physiology of postmenopausal women as well as on its efficacy. It is also possible that these new compounds could suppress oestrogen synthesis in premenopausal women, but the consequences on ovarian folliculogenesis might prevent their widespread use in this group of patients.     

The development, application and limitations of breast cancer cell lines to study tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor resistance

Estrogen plays important roles in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapies, such as the antiestrogen tamoxifen, antagonize the binding of estrogen to estrogen receptor (ER), whereas aromatase inhibitors (AIs) directly inhibit the production of estrogen. Understanding the mechanisms of endocrine resistance and the ways in which we may better treat these types of resistance has been aided by the development of cellular models for resistant breast cancers. In this review, we will discuss what is known thus far regarding both de novo and acquired resistance to tamoxifen or AIs. Our laboratory has generated a collection of AI- and tamoxifen-resistant cell lines in order to comprehensively study the individual types of resistance mechanisms. Through the use of microarray analysis, we have determined that our cell lines resistant to a particular AI (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane) or tamoxifen are distinct from each other, indicating that these mechanisms can be quite complex. Furthermore, we will describe two novel de novo AI-resistant cell lines that were generated from our laboratory. Initial characterization of these cells reveals that they are distinct from our acquired AI-resistant cell models. In addition, we will review potential therapies which may be useful for overcoming resistant breast cancers through studies using endocrine resistant cell lines. Finally, we will discuss the benefits and shortcomings of cell models. Together, the information presented in this review will provide us a better understanding of acquired and de novo resistance to tamoxifen and AI therapies, the use of appropriate cell models to better study these types of breast cancer, which are valuable for identifying novel treatments and strategies for overcoming both tamoxifen and AI-resistant breast cancers.     

Thrombospondin is a slow tight-binding inhibitor of plasmin.

Thrombospondin is a multifunctional glycoprotein of platelet alpha-granules and a variety of growing cells. We demonstrate that thrombospondin is a slow tight-binding inhibitor of plasmin as determined by loss of amidolytic activity, loss of ability to cleave fibrinogen, and decreased lysis zones in fibrin plate assays. Stoichiometric titrations indicate that approximately 1 mol of plasmin interacts with 1 mol of thrombospondin, an unexpected result considering the trimeric nature of thrombospondin. Plasmin in a complex with streptokinase or bound to epsilon-aminocaproic acid is protected from inhibition by thrombospondin, thereby implicating the lysine-binding kringle domains of plasmin in the inhibition process. Thrombospondin also inhibits urokinase plasminogen activator, but more slowly than plasmin, stimulates the amidolytic activity of tissue plasminogen activator, and has no effect on the amidolytic activity of alpha-thrombin or factor Xa. These results, therefore, identify thrombospondin as a new type of serine proteinase inhibitor and potentially important regulator of fibrinolysis.     

R 76713, a new specific non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor

The effects of R 76713, a new triazole derivative, on rat ovarian, testicular and adrenal steroidogenesis were investigated both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro R 76713 is a very potent inhibitor of the aromatase enzyme in rat granulosa cells, showing an IC50-value of 3.0 +/- 0.2 nM. The compound is about 1000 times more active than aminoglutethimide which shows an IC50-value of 3900 +/- 2800 nM in the same system. R 76713 is also a highly selective aromatase inhibitor. In cultures of ovarian, testicular and adrenal cells, formation of progesterone, androgens and glucocorticoids was only affected by drug concentrations higher than 1 microM. In vivo, single oral drug doses of 0.05 mg/kg lowered plasma estradiol levels of PMSG-primed female rats by more than 90%. An ED50-value of 0.005 mg/kg could be calculated. A single oral dose of 1 mg/kg suppressed plasma estradiol levels almost completely for 24 h. A dose of 0.1 mg/kg lowered plasma estradiol by more than 90% for 8 h. In vivo, R 76713 also showed a highly selective profile. In LHRH/ACTH-injected rats, plasma levels of testicular and adrenal steroids remained unchanged after administration of a drug dose of 20 mg/kg. R 76713 at drug concentrations of 10 microM, showed no interaction in vitro with estrogen-, progestin-, androgen- and glucocorticoid-receptors. Given orally at 20 mg/kg for 3 days the compound also showed no estrogen or androgen agonistic or antagonistic effects.     

Exemestane,a new steroidal aromatase inhibitor of clinical relevance

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women and the contribution of circulating oestrogens to the growth of some mammary tumours has been recognized. Consequently, suppression of oestrogen action by inhibition of their biosynthesis at the androstenedione-oestrone aromatization step, by means of selective inhibitors of the enzyme aromatase, has become an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Exemestane (6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) is a novel steroidal irreversible aromatase inhibitor recently approved and introduced into the global market under the name Aromasin. The design, laboratory and viable syntheses of exemestane, starting from a variety of steroidal precursors, are presented and discussed. Data from biochemical and pharmacological studies as well as the clinical impact of the compound are briefly reviewed. The drug is an orally active and well-tolerated hormonal therapy for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer that has become refractory to standard current hormonal therapies.     

Postmenopausal estrogen synthesis and metabolism: alterations caused by aromatase inhibitors used for the treatment of breast cancer

Inhibition of postmenopausal estrogen production by aromatase inhibitors is an established drug treatment modality for postmenopausal breast cancer. In this article postmenopausal estrogen disposition and the alterations caused by treatment with aromatase inhibitors are reviewed. Recent investigations have challenged the hypothesis that aromatization of androstenedione into estrone is the sole production pathway for estrogens in postmenopausal women. The finding that estrogens persist in the plasma of patients receiving aminoglutethimide treatment despite a near total inhibition of the aromatase enzyme suggests that alternative pathways for estrogen synthesis exist. While nonspecific actions of aromatase inhibitors may be disadvantageous, certain effects may also be beneficial. Recent findings that aminoglutethimide may induce estrone sulfate metabolism questions whether this "prototype" aromatase inhibitor might have a dual mechanism of action. The importance of investigating the possible influence of different aromatase inhibitors on all components of estrogen disposition is considered.     

Boron-enriched streptavidin potentially useful as a component of boron carriers for neutron capture therapy of cancer.

A boron-enriched streptavidin has been prepared by chemical conjugation of a boron-rich compound, B(12)H(11)SH(2)(-) (BSH), to a genetically engineered streptavidin variant. The streptavidin variant used has 20 cysteine residues per molecule, derived from a C-terminal cysteine stretch consisting of five cysteine residues per subunit. Because natural streptavidin has no cysteine residues, the reactive sulfhydryl groups of the cysteine stretch serve as unique conjugation sites for sulfhydryl chemistry. BSH was conjugated irreversibly to the sulfhydryl groups of the streptavidin variant via a sulfhydryl-specific homobifunctional chemical cross-linker. Quantitative boron analysis indicates that the resulting streptavidin-BSH conjugate carries approximately 230 boron atoms/molecule. This indicates that the chemical conjugation of BSH to the streptavidin variant was highly specific and efficient because this method should allow the conjugation of a maximum of 240 boron atoms/streptavidin molecule. This boron-enriched streptavidin retained both full biotin-binding ability and tetrameric structure, suggesting that the conjugation of BSH has little, if any, effect on the fundamental properties of streptavidin. This boron-enriched streptavidin should be very useful as a component of targetable boron carriers for neutron capture therapy of cancer. For example, a monoclonal antibody against a tumor-associated antigen can be attached tightly to the boron-enriched streptavidin upon simple biotinylation, and the resulting conjugate could be used to target boron to tumor cells on which the tumor-associated antigen is overexpressed.     

Fluoride is a slow, tight-binding inhibitor of the calcium ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Addition of sodium fluoride in the millimolar concentration range to a solution containing the sarcoplasmic reticulum CaATPase undergoing turnover in its vesicular or nonionic detergent-solubilized forms produced a slow (time range of minutes) complete loss of enzymatic activity. In the presence of magnesium and the absence of calcium, similar results were obtained under nonturnover conditions. Time courses were adequately fit by a function corresponding to a monophasic transformation with a pseudo first order rate constant kobs. In the absence of Mg2+ (EDTA present) no inhibition developed; kobs depended hyperbolically on the Mg2+ concentration with the half maximal effect occurring near 4 mM. The fluoride concentration dependence of kobs showed no evidence of approaching saturation (highest [F-] used was 40 mM) and corresponded to a rate law which was approximately second-order with respect to fluoride. A number of ligands known to bind to the CaATPase were found to decrease kobs. Calcium prevented onset of fluoride inhibition with a midpoint in the micromolar range, implying an effect due to binding at the high affinity transport sites. ATP also protected with a midpoint in the micromolar range, consistent with an effect caused by active site binding of the nucleotide; protection was only partial, suggesting the ATPase can bind fluoride and ATP simultaneously. Prevention of fluoride inhibition by Pi occurred with a [Pi]1/2 of 12 mM at pH 6.5, a concentration similar to that which produces active site phosphorylation. Finally, protection by orthovanadate was found to be competitive and have a midpoint of 5 microM. These results point to an effect exerted at or near the phosphorylation site. The value of kobs increased from essentially zero above pH 8 to a plateau below pH 6; the transition had a midpoint near pH 7.2. Inhibition persisted after removal (with EGTA present) of unbound fluoride by dialysis. Reversal of fluoride inhibition was very slow, with a t1/2 of 16 h at 37 degrees C. These results suggest that fluoride behaves like a slow, tight-binding inhibitor of the ATPase and that the resulting complex is a stable transition (or intermediate) state analog. Plausible molecular bases for our results are that fluoride acts at the phosphorylation site as an analog of Pi or of hydroxide, which may be considered a substrate in the normal hydrolysis of the phosphorylated enzyme. A role for aluminum was ruled out after finding that the addition of EGTA to 10 mM or aluminum sulfate to 0.2 mM or deferoxamine to 0.5 mM produced no significant change in kobs.