The THP-1 cell line is a urokinase-secreting mononuclear phagocyte with a novel defect in the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-2

Mononuclear phagocytes regulate the generation of plasmin by secreting urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2). We investigated the production of plasminogen activator (PA) and PA inhibitor by the human monocytic leukemia cell line, THP-1. Similar to U937 monoblast-like cells and peripheral blood monocytes (PBM), THP-1 cells produce a PA that is specifically neutralized by anti-uPA antibody and comigrates with human high molecular mass uPA (54 kDa) on casein-plasminogen zymogaphy. PA activity could be dissociated from intact THP-1 cells by brief treatment with a weak acid-glycine buffer, indicating that the uPA is secreted and bound to receptors on the plasma membrane. Regulation of uPA proceeds normally in THP-1 cells, with cell-associated PA activity increasing from 77 +/- 20 to 163 +/- 26 and 325 +/- 30 mPU/10(6) cells in response to PMA and LPS, respectively; parallel increases in steady state levels of uPA mRNA were observed. In contrast to normal expression of uPA activity, functional PAI-2 could not be demonstrated in either the conditioned media or cell lysates of THP-1 under basal or stimulated conditions. Both U937 and PBM secrete low levels of PA inhibitor activity that increase substantially in response to stimulation with PMA and LPS. Immunoreactive PAI-2, measured by ELISA, was undetectable in THP-1 lysates or conditioned medium, but was consistently present in U937 and PBM, paralleling the presence of PA inhibitor activity. THP-1 cells express low levels of an abnormally sized mRNA for PAI-2 and demonstrate a regulatory defect whereby steady state levels of PAI-2 mRNA are markedly reduced upon stimulation with PMA or LPS. By contrast, U937 and PBM respond to identical stimulation with increases in PAI-2 mRNA. We conclude that THP-1 cells express a structurally abnormal species of PAI-2 mRNA, with complete loss of inhibitory activity as well as altered function of PMA- and LPS-responsive regulatory elements.     

Inhibition of receptor-bound urokinase by plasminogen-activator inhibitors

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) binds to a specific receptor on various cell types, the bound molecule retaining its enzymatic activity against plasminogen. We have now investigated whether receptor-bound uPA also retains the ability to react with and be inhibited by plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2). uPA bound to its receptor on human U937 monocyte-like cells was inhibited by PAI-1 (in its active form in the presence of vitronectin fragments) with an association rate constant of 4.5 x 10(6) M-1 s-1, which was 40% lower than that obtained for uPA in solution (7.9 x 10(6) M-1 s-1). The inhibition of uPA by PAI-2 was decreased to a similar extent by receptor binding, falling from 5.3 x 10(5) to 3.3 x 10(5) M-1 s-1. Stimulation of U937 cells with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was accompanied by a further reduction in receptor-bound uPA inhibition by PAI-1 and PAI-2 to 1.7 x 10(6) and 1.1 x 10(5) M-1 s-1, respectively. These constants although lower than those for uPA in solution still represent rather rapid inhibition of the enzyme, and demonstrate that uPA bound to its specific cellular receptor remains available for efficient inhibition by PAI's, which may therefore play a major role in controlling cell-surface plasminogen activation and extracellular proteolytic activity.     

alpha-2 Macroglobulin receptor/Ldl receptor-related protein(Lrp)- dependent internalization of the urokinase receptor

The GPI-anchored urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) does not internalize free urokinase (uPA). On the contrary, uPAR-bound complexes of uPA with its serpin inhibitors PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1) or PN-1 (protease nexin-1) are readily internalized in several cell types. Here we address the question whether uPAR is internalized as well upon binding of uPA-serpin complexes. Both LB6 clone 19 cells, a mouse cell line transfected with the human uPAR cDNA, and the human U937 monocytic cell line, express in addition to uPAR also the endocytic alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP/alpha 2-MR) which is required to internalize uPAR-bound uPA-PAI-1 and uPA-PN-1 complexes. Downregulation of cell surface uPAR molecules in U937 cells was detected by cytofluorimetric analysis after uPA-PAI-1 and uPA-PN-1 incubation for 30 min at 37 degrees C; this effect was blocked by preincubation with the ligand of LRP/alpha 2-MR, RAP (LRP/alpha 2-MR- associated protein), known to block the binding of the uPA complexes to LRP/alpha 2-. MR. Downregulation correlated in time with the intracellular appearance of uPAR as assessed by confocal microscopy and immuno-electron microscopy. After 30 min incubation with uPA-PAI-1 or uPA-PN-1 (but not with free uPA), confocal microscopy showed that uPAR staining in permeabilized LB6 clone 19 cells moved from a mostly surface associated to a largely perinuclear position. This effect was inhibited by the LRP/alpha 2-MR RAP. Perinuclear uPAR did not represent newly synthesized nor a preexisting intracellular pool of uPAR, since this fluorescence pattern was not modified by treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, and since in LB6 clone 19 cells all of uPAR was expressed on the cell surface. Immuno-electron microscopy confirmed the plasma membrane to intracellular translocation of uPAR, and its dependence on LRP/alpha 2-MR in LB6 clone 19 cells only after binding to the uPA-PAI-1 complex. After 30 min incubation at 37 degrees C with uPA-PAI-1, 93% of the specific immunogold particles were present in cytoplasmic vacuoles vs 17.6% in the case of DFP-uPA. We conclude therefore that in the process of uPA-serpin internalization, uPAR itself is internalized, and that internalization requires the LRP/alpha 2-MR.     

The receptor for urokinase type plasminogen activator polarizes expression of the protease to the leading edge of migrating monocytes and promotes degradation of enzyme inhibitor complexes

Receptor-bound urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) remains associated to the surface of human monocytes for many hours. Monocytes induced to migrate in a chemotactic gradient of f-Met-Leu-Phe rapidly polarize their uPA receptors to the leading front of the cells. Receptor-bound enzyme can be inhibited by plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (PAI-2), with a kinetics comparable to that determined for the free enzyme, and uPA/PAI-2 complexes can bind to the uPA receptor. In contrast to the active enzyme, the uPA/PAI-2 complex is rapidly cleared from the monocyte cell surface; this involves an initial cleavage of the complex at the cell surface, followed by endocytosis and degradation. These results indicate that the uPA receptor can function both to focus plasmin-mediated extracellular matrix degradation in front of migrating cells, and to target uPA/PAI-2 enzyme/inhibitor complexes for degradation; they suggest that this receptor is a key determinant in the control of uPA-catalyzed extracellular proteolysis.     

The urokinase/PAI-2 complex: a new high affinity ligand for the endocytosis receptor low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein

The efficient inactivation of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) by plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) at the surface of carcinoma cells is followed by rapid endocytosis of the uPA-PAI-2 complex. We now show that one pathway of this receptor-mediated endocytosis is mediated via the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) in prostate cancer cells. Detailed biochemical analyses using ligand binding assays and surface plasmon resonance revealed a novel and distinct interaction mechanism between native, human LRP and uPA-PAI-2. As reported previously for PAI-1, inhibition of uPA by PAI-2 significantly increased the affinity of the complex for LRP (K(D) of 36 nm for uPA-PAI-2 versus 200 nm for uPA). This interaction was maintained in the presence of uPAR, confirming the validity of this interaction at the cell surface. However, unlike PAI-1, no interaction was observed between LRP and PAI-2 in either the stressed or the relaxed conformation. This suggests that the uPA-PAI-2-LRP interaction is mediated by site(s) within the uPA molecule alone. Thus, as inhibition of uPA by PAI-2 resulted in accelerated clearance of uPA from the cell surface possibly via its increased affinity for LRP, this represents a mechanism through which PAI-2 can clear proteolytic activity from the cell surface. Furthermore, lack of a direct interaction between PAI-2 and LRP implies that downstream signaling events initiated by PAI-1 may not be activated by PAI-2.     

A hybrid protein of urokinase growth-factor domain and plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 2 inhibits urokinase activity and binds to the urokinase receptor.

The binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its specific cell-surface receptor (uPAR) localises the proteolytic cascade initiated by uPA to the pericellular environment. Inhibition of uPA activity or prevention of uPA binding to uPAR might have a beneficial effect on disease states wherein this activity is deregulated, e.g. cancer and some inflammatory diseases. To this end, a bifunctional hybrid molecule consisting of the uPAR-binding growth-factor domain of uPA (amino acids 1-47; GFuPA) at the N-terminus of plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 2 (PAI-2) was produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The purified protein inhibited uPA with kinetics similar to placental or recombinant PAI-2 and was also found to bind to U937 cells and to FL amnion cells. GFuPA-PAI-2 competed with uPA, the N-terminal fragment of uPA and a proteolytic fragment of uPA (amino acids 4-43) in cell binding experiments, indicating that the molecule bound to the cells via uPAR. Hence, both the uPA-inhibitory and uPAR-binding domains of the hybrid molecule were functional, demonstrating the feasibility of the novel concept of introducing an unrelated, functional domain onto a member of the serine-protease-inhibitor superfamily.     

The Receptor for Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator of a Human Keratinocyte Line (HaCaT)

It is assumed that plasmin participates in pericellular proteolysis in the epidermis. Plasmin is generated by keratinocyte-associated plasminogen activators from the proenzyme plasminogen; plasminogen activation can proceed at the keratinocyte surface. The resultant plasmin interferes with cell to matrix adhesion and does possibly contribute to keratinocyte migration during reepithelialization. Here we describe the receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA-R) in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, which serves to direct plasminogen activation to the cell surface; we relate the receptor to the uPA-R previously described in human myclo-/monocytes. Binding of uPA to the receptor accelerated plasminogen activation by a factor of ≈10, compared to uPA in solution. Receptor-bound uPA was susceptible to inhibition by the plasminogen activator inhibitors 1 and 2. uPA and uPA-R antigen, as well as uPA activity, were localized to the leading front of expanding sheets of HaCaT cells. Exposure of HaCaT cells to plasminogen was followed by detachment of the cells. Detachment was prevented by an anti-catalytic anti-uPA antibody, by the plasmin-specific inhibitor aprotinin, and by the lysine analogue tranexamic acid, the latter of which prevents plasmin(ogen) binding to the cell surface. Our findings support the hypothesis that uPA-mediated plasminogen activation is characteristic of mobile rather than sessile keratinocytes. Moreover, the uPA-R seems to focalize plasminogen activation to the surface of cells at the site of keratinocyte migration.     

Reciprocal upregulation of urokinase plasminogen activator and its inhibitor, PAI-2, by Borrelia burgdorferi affects bacterial penetration and host-inflammatory response

The mammalian plasminogen activation system (PAS) is a complex system involved in multiple physiological and pathological processes. Borrelia burgdorferi interacts with certain components of the PAS. Here we further investigate this interaction to determine its effect on bacterial dissemination and host cell migration in vitro. We show that stimulation of monocytic cells with B. burgdorferi induces the transient production and secretion of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), shortly followed by its physiological inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2). Mono Mac 6 (MM6) cells as well as peripheral blood monocytes enhanced transmigration of B. burgdorferi across a barrier coated with fibronectin mediated by uPA. Moreover, the induction of PAI-2 or the addition of recombinant PAI-2 did not have a significant effect on the uPA-potentiated transmigration of B. burgdorferi. In contrast, the induction of PAI-2 by B. burgdorferi resulted in significantly diminished invasion by monocytic cells across a reconstituted basement membrane (matrigel), which could be partially restored by treatment with purified uPA. These results show that the PAS plays a twofold role in the pathogenesis of B. burgdorferi infection, both by enhancing bacterial dissemination and by diminishing host-cell inflammatory migration.     

Receptor-mediated internalization and degradation of urokinase is caused by its specific inhibitor PAI-1.

The receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) has been previously shown not to internalize its ligand, but rather to focalize its activity at the cell surface, allowing a regulated cell surface plasmin dependent proteolysis. The receptor in fact binds the proenzyme pro-uPA and allows its very efficient conversion to the active two chains form. Receptor bound active uPA can also interact with its specific type 1 inhibiror (PAI-1) which is therefore able to inhibit the cell surface plasmin formation. In this paper we show that the uPA-PAI-1 complex bound to the uPA receptor is internalized and degraded. U937 cells were incubated at 4 degrees C with labeled uPA-PAI-1 (and other ligands), the temperature then raised to 37 degrees C and the fate of the ligand followed for 3 h thereafter. The uPA-PAI-1 complex was internalized into the cells (i.e. could not be dissociated by acid treatment) and thereafter degraded (i.e. appeared in the supernatant in a non TCA-precipitable form). Other ligands (free uPA, ATF and DFP-treated uPA) were not internalized nor degraded. The degradation of the uPA-PAI-1 complex is preceded by internalization and is inhibited by chloroquine, an inhibitor of lysosomal protein degradation. These data suggest the existence of a cellular cycle of uPA. After synthesis pro-uPA is secreted, bound to the receptor and activated to two chain uPA. On the surface, uPA can activate surface bound plasminogen to produce surface bound plasmin. In the presence of PAI-1 uPA activity is inhibited and plasmin production interrupted, while the uPA-PAI-1 complex is internalized and degraded.     

Is plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 the molecular switch that governs urokinase receptor-mediated cell adhesion and release?

Induction of the urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) promotes cell adhesion through its interaction with vitronectin (VN) in the extracellular matrix, and facilitates cell migration and invasion by localizing uPA to the cell surface. We provide evidence that this balance between cell adhesion and cell detachment is governed by PA inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). First, we demonstrate that uPAR and PAI-1 bind to the same site in VN (i.e., the amino-terminal somatomedin B domain; SMB), and that PAI-1 competes with uPAR for binding to SMB. Domain swapping and mutagenesis studies indicate that the uPAR-binding sequence is located within the central region of the SMB domain, a region previously shown to contain the PAI-1-binding motif. Second, we show that PAI-1 dissociates bound VN from uPAR and detaches U937 cells from their VN substratum. This PAI-1 mediated release of cells from VN appears to occur independently of its ability to function as a protease inhibitor, and may help to explain why high PAI-1 levels indicate a poor prognosis for many cancers. Finally, we show that uPA can rapidly reverse this effect of PAI-1. Taken together, these results suggest a dynamic regulatory role for PAI-1 and uPA in uPAR-mediated cell adhesion and release.     

Enzymatic properties of the phosphorylated urokinase-type plasminogen activator isolated from a human carcinomatous cell line.

Enzymatic properties of phosphorylated urokinase plasminogen activator (P-uPA) (1) extracted from human carcinomatous cell line Detroit 562 cells were compared with those of non-phosphorylated uPA of urinary origin (nP-uPA). Using plasminogen as a substrate, the Km and Kcat of P-uPA were higher than that of nP-uPA while the Kcat/Km was lower. By zymography, a greater degree of plasminogen activation was observed. Concanavalin A reacted to both the enzymes. P-uPA had a low affinity for the inhibitors of plasminogen activator PAI-1 and PAI-2, and was inhibited only by the excess amounts of inhibitors. For PAI-1, and the KIs of P-uPA was greater and for PAI-2, KI was higher for P-uPA. These alterations by phosphorylation enable uPA to be more efficient in a focal proteolysis through plasminogen activation.     

Downregulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 by grape seed proanthocyanidin extract

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system, comprising of uPA, its receptor uPAR and inhibitor, type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), plays a vital role in various biological processes involving extracellular proteolysis, fibrinolysis, cell migration and proliferation. The timely occurence of these processes are essential for normal wound healing. This study examines the regulation of uPA and PAI-1 by a natural polyphenol-rich compound, grape seed extract (GSE). GSE is reported to have beneficial effects in promoting wound healing. Fibroblast cells exposed to different doses of GSE for 18 hours were processed for further studies such as ELISA, RT-PCR, western blotting, fibrinolytic assay, cell surface plasmin activity assay and in vitro wound healing assay. GSE treatment caused a significant downregulation of uPA and PAI-1 expression, both at the RNA and protein levels. ELISA also revealed a dose-dependent decrease in uPA and PAI-1 activities. Functional significance of the downregulation was evident in decreased fibrinolytic activity, concomittant with decreased cell-surface plasmin activity. In vitro wound healing studies showed that GSE also retarded the migration of cells towards the wounded region.     

Transforming growth factor beta1 stimulates urokinase plasminogen activator system on prostate cancer cells

The effect of TGFbeta1 on the proliferation and plasminogen activator system (PA) of two prostate carcinoma cell lines, PC3 and DU145, was investigated. PA, particularly urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), has been implicated in extracellular proteolysis, local invasiveness, metastatic spread and angiogenesis. High levels of uPA and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) correlate with poor prognosis in several cancers. TGFbeta1 had no significant effect on the proliferation of either cell line. TGFbeta1 increased the production of uPA in PC3 and DU145 cells. Despite the very low PAI-1 protein levels in both cell lines, TGFbeta1 treatment resulted in a remarkable increase in PAI-1 secretion. PAI-2 protein was also increased by 59% in the PC3 cells. A divergent effect of TGFbeta1 on the uPA enzyme activity was observed (28% decrease in PC3 and 131% increase in DU145 cells). Overall, TGFbeta1 treatment did not affect the invasion of reconstituted basement membrane of PC3 cells. In addition to the uPA:PAI-1 ratio, the presence of PAI-2 may be an important factor in the determination of metastatic sites for prostate cancer cells. In conclusion, the potential contribution of TGFbeta1 to tumor invasion may be considered as positive, based on both loss of growth inhibition and stimulation of components of the invasive system of prostate carcinoma.     

Occupancy of the cancer cell urokinase receptor (uPAR): effects of acid elution and exogenous uPA on cell surface urokinase (uPA).

The development of a simple, sensitive fluorimetric assay for the measurement of cell surface-associated urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) on viable, adherent HCT116 cells in microtitre plates, after a preincubation with purified human plasminogen is described. The assay determines plasmin activity by the cleavage of H-D-Val-Leu-Lys 4-aminomethyl coumarin under near physiological pH and ionic conditions with a sensitivity in the range of 5-100 mIU uPA/well at excitation 355 nm and emission 460 nm. Plasmin generated during the assay converted all cell-surface sc-uPA to tc-uPA, allowing the determination of total uPA activity. Inhibitor studies (PAI-2, amiloride or Glu-Gly-Arg chloromethylketone) confirmed the specificity of the uPA assay. Removal of these agents prior to assay allowed determination of the cell surface sc-uPA:tc-uPA ratio. Cell surface activity was only partially removed by acid elution. This corresponded with the loss of a number of proteins and uPA-containing species as detected by SDS-PAGE, gelatin enzymography and Western blotting. Although the major protein species eluted had a M(r) of 55 kDa, reacted with a commercial anti-human uPA mAb and correlated with the main lytic zone, other higher M(r) species were also eluted from HCT116 cells. Exogenous uPA increased cell-surface activity markedly on cells previously treated with acid. Following acid elution, cell surface uPA activity was restored after 30h in culture suggesting either de novo synthesis or release of pre-formed uPA with subsequent secretion and binding to uPAR. The assay has enabled studies on adherent cells to address questions about the regulation and expression of cell-surface uPA.     

Transforming growth factor-beta1 produced by ovarian cancer cell line HRA stimulates attachment and invasion through an up-regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 in human peritoneal mesothelial cells

The processes of ovarian cancer dissemination are characterized by altered local proteolysis, cellular proliferation, cell attachment, and invasion, suggesting that the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its specific inhibitor (plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1)) could be involved in the pathogenesis of peritoneal dissemination. We showed previously that expression of uPA and PAI-1 in the human ovarian cancer cell line HRA can be down-regulated by exogenous bikunin (bik), a Kunitz-type protease inhibitor, via suppression of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) up-regulation and that overexpression of the bik gene can specifically suppress the in vivo growth and peritoneal dissemination of HRA cells in an animal model. We hypothesize that the plasminogen activator system in mesothelial cells can be modulated by HRA cells. To test this hypothesis, we used complementary techniques in mesothelial cells to determine whether uPA and PAI-1 expression are altered by exposure to culture media conditioned by HRA cells. Here we show the following: 1) that expression of PAI-1, but not uPA, was markedly induced by culture media conditioned by wild-type HRA cells but not by bik transfected clones; 2) that by antibody neutralization the effect appeared to be mediated by HRA cell-derived TGF-beta1; 3) that exogenous TGF-beta1 specifically enhanced PAI-1 up-regulation at the mRNA and protein level in mesothelial cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, mainly through MAPK-dependent activation mechanism; and 4) that mesothelial cell-derived PAI-1 may promote tumor invasion possibly by enhancing cell-cell interaction. This represents a novel pathway by which tumor cells can regulate the plasminogen activator system-dependent cellular responses in mesothelial cells that may contribute to formation of peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer.     

Internalization of the urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 complex is mediated by the urokinase receptor.

The role of the urokinase receptor (uPAR) in the internalization of the urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (uPA.PAI-1) complex has been investigated. First, exploiting the species specificity of uPA binding, we show that mouse LB6 cells (that express a mouse uPAR) were unable to bind or degrade the human uPA.PAI-1 complex. On the other hand, LB6 clone 19 cells, which express a transfected human uPAR, degraded uPA.PAI-1 complexes with kinetics identical to the human monocytic U937 cells. We also show by immunofluorescence experiments with anti-uPA antibodies that in LB6 clone 19 cells, the uPA.PAI-1 complex is indeed internalized. While at 4 degrees C uPA fluorescence was visible at the cell surface, shift of the temperature to 37 degrees C caused a displacement of the immunoreactivity to the cytoplasmic compartment, with a pattern indicating lysosomal localization. If uPA.PAI-1 internalization/degradation is mediated by uPAR, inhibition of uPA.PAI-1 binding to uPAR should block degradation. Three different treatments, competition with the agonist amino-terminal fragment of uPA, treatment with a monoclonal antibody directed toward the binding domain of uPAR or release of uPAR from the cell surface with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C completely prevented uPA.PAI-1 degradation. The possibility that a serpin-enzyme complex receptor might be primarily or secondarily involved in the internalization process was excluded since a serpin-enzyme complex peptide failed to inhibit uPA.PAI-1 binding and degradation. Similarly, complexes of PAI-1 with low molecular mass uPA (33 kDa uPA), which lacks the uPAR binding domain, were neither bound nor degraded. Finally we also show that treatment of cells with uPA.PAI-1 complex caused a specific but partial down-regulation of uPAR. A similar result was obtained when PAI-1 was allowed to complex to uPA that had been previously bound to the receptor. The possibility therefore exists that the entire complex uPA.PAI-1-uPAR is internalized. All these data allow us to conclude that internalization of the uPA.PAI-1 complex is mediated by uPAR.     

Components of the Plasminogen Activation System Promote Engraftment of Porous Polyethylene Biomaterial via Common and Distinct Effects

Rapid fibrovascularization is a prerequisite for successful biomaterial engraftment. In addition to their well-known roles in fibrinolysis, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or their inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) have recently been implicated as individual mediators in non-fibrinolytic processes, including cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Since these events are critical for fibrovascularization of biomaterial, we hypothesized that the components of the plasminogen activation system contribute to biomaterial engraftment. Employing in vivo and ex vivo microscopy techniques, vessel and collagen network formation within porous polyethylene (PPE) implants engrafted into dorsal skinfold chambers were found to be significantly impaired in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice. Consequently, the force required for mechanical disintegration of the implants out of the host tissue was significantly lower in the mutant mice than in wild-type controls. Conversely, surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, non-catalytic uPA, or PAI-1, but not with non-catalytic tPA, accelerated implant vascularization in wild-type mice. Thus, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 contribute to the fibrovascularization of PPE implants through common and distinct effects. As clinical perspective, surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 might provide a novel strategy for accelerating the vascularization of this biomaterial.     

Regulated localization confers multiple functions on the protease urokinase plasminogen activator

We have investigated the role of the plasminogen activation cascade in skeletal muscle differentiation. Migrating, undifferentiated myoblasts express urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its cell surface receptor (uPAR). Consequently, uPA is localized predominantly to the cell surface. Preventing uPA from associating with its receptor with a noncatalytic form of uPA (NC-uPA) hinders migration of myoblasts and inhibits differentiation. When myoblasts reach confluence, cease migrating, and start to differentiate, uPAR gets downregulated, and uPA becomes redistributed from the cell surface to the extracellular space. The function of uPA at this stage was tested using the protease inhibitors aprotinin, α₂-antiplasmin, or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). Contrary to the role of cell-associated uPA, inhibition of soluble uPA/plasmin stimulates differentiation of myoblasts. Aprotinin can inhibit activation of latent TGFβ and stimulates differentiation, suggesting PAI-1 and α₂-antiplasmin also may stimulate differentiation via this mechanism. These data suggest that regulation of uPA localization allows a dual function for this protease in regulating cell migration and controlling cell differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 171:217–225, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

A structural basis for differential cell signalling by PAI-1 and PAI-2 in breast cancer cells

PAI-1 and PAI-2 (plasminogen-activator inibitor types 1 and 2) are inhibitors of cell surface uPA (urokinase plasminogen activator). However, tumour expression of PAI-1 and PAI-2 correlates with poor compared with good patient prognosis in breast cancer respectively. This biological divergence may be related to additional functional roles of PAI-1. For example, the inhibition of uPA by PAI-1 reveals a cryptic high-affinity site within the PAI-1 moiety for the VLDLr (very-low-density-lipoprotein receptor), which sustains cell signalling events initiated by binding of uPA to its receptor. These interactions and subsequent signalling events promote proliferation of breast cancer cells. Biochemical and structural analyses show that, unlike PAI-1, the PAI-2 moiety of uPA-PAI-2 does not contain a high-affinity-binding site for VLDLr, although uPA-PAI-2 is still efficiently endocytosed via this receptor in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, global protein tyrosine phosphorylation events were not sustained by uPA-PAI-2 and cell proliferation was not affected. We thus propose a structurally based mechanism for these differences between PAI-1 and PAI-2 and suggest that PAI-2 is able to inhibit and clear uPA activity without initiating mitogenic signalling events through VLDLr.