Studies of the human, rat, and guinea pig Y4 receptors using neuropeptide Y analogues and two distinct radioligands

The neuropeptide Y-family receptor Y4 differs extensively between human and rat in sequence, receptor binding, and anatomical distribution. We have investigated the differences in binding profile between the cloned human, rat, and guinea pig Y4 receptors using NPY analogues with single amino acid replacements or deletion of the central portion. The most striking result was the increase in affinity for the rat receptor, but not for human or guinea pig, when amino acid 34 was replaced with proline; [Ahx(8-20),Pro(34)]NPY bound to the rat Y4 receptor with 20-fold higher affinity than [Ahx(8-20)]NPY. Also, the rat Y4 tolerates alanine in position 34 since p[Ala(34)]NPY bound with similar affinity as pNPY while the affinity for hY4 and gpY4 decreased about 50-fold. Alanine substitutions in position 33, 35, and 36 as well as the large loop-deletion, [Ahx(5-24)]NPY, reduced the binding affinity to all three receptors more than 100-fold. NPY and PYY competed with (125)I-hPP at Y4 receptors expressed in CHO cells according to a two-site model. This was investigated for gpY4 by saturation with either radiolabeled hPP or pPYY. The number of high-affinity binding-sites for (125)I-pPYY was about 60% of the receptors recognized by (125)I-hPP. Porcine [Ala(34)]NPY and [Ahx(8-20)]NPY bound to rY4 (but not to hY4 or gpY4) according to a two-site model. These results suggest that different full agonists can distinguish between different active conformations of the gpY4 receptor and that Y4 may display functional differences in vivo between human, guinea pig, and rat.     

Functional reconstitution of human neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(2) and Y(4) receptors in Sf9 insect cells

The four functionally expressed human neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes (hY(1)R, hY(2)R, hY(4)R, hY(5)R) belong to class A of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and interact with pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o)-proteins. The number of small molecules described as ligands for hY(1)R and hY(5)R exceeds by far those for hY(2)R. Potent non-peptidergic ligands for the hY(4)R are not available so far. Here, we report on the functional reconstitution of the hY(2)R and the hY(4)R in Sf9 insect cells using the baculovirus system. Sf9 cells were genetically engineered by infection with up to four different baculoviruses, combining the receptors with G-proteins of the G(i/o) family and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins to improve signal-to-noise ratio. In steady-state GTPase assays, using pNPY (Y(2)) and hPP (Y(4)), the GPCRs coupled to various G(i)/G(o)-proteins and both, RGS4 and GAIP, enhanced the signals. Co-expression systems hY(2)R + G?(i2) and hY(4)R + G?(i2)/G?(o) + RGS4, combined with G?(1)?(2), yielded best signal-to-noise ratios. hY(2)R function was validated using both agonistic peptides (NPY, PYY, NPY(13?36)) and selective non-peptidergic antagonists (BIIE0246 and derivatives), whereas the hY(4)R model was characterized with peptidergic agonists (PP, NPY, GW1229, and BW1911U90). Tunicamycin inhibited receptor N-glycosylation diminished NPY signals at hY(2)R and abolished hY(4)R function. Investigations with monovalent salts showed sensitivity of hY(4)R toward Na(+), revealing moderate constitutive activity. After validation, an acylguanidine (UR-PI284) was identified as a weak non-peptide Y(4)R antagonist. In summary, the established steady-state GTPase assays provide sensitive test systems for the characterization of Y(2) and Y(4) receptor ligands.     

Feeding after fourth ventricular administration of neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) stimulate food intake after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle, suggesting that NPY receptors in the hindbrain are targets for the stimulatory effect of these peptides on food intake. However, the NPY/PYY receptor subtype mediating the feeding response in the hindbrain is not known. To approach to this question we compared dose-effect of several NPY receptor agonists to stimulate food intake in freely-feeding rats 60- and 120-min after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle. At the 120-min time point, PYY was 2- to 10-times as potent as NPY over the dose-response range and stimulated twice the total intake at the maximally effective dose (2-fold greater efficacy). NPY was 2-times as potent as the Y1, Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY but acted with comparable efficacy. The Y5-, Y2-differentiating receptor agonist, NPY 2-36, was comparable in potency to PYY at low doses but equal in efficacy NPY and [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY. The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, produced only a marginal effect on total food intake. The profile of agonist potency after fourth cerebral ventricle administration is similar to the profile obtained when these or related agonists are injected in the region of the hypothalamus. Agonists at both Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulated food intake with a rank order of potency that does not conclusively favor the exclusive involvement of a single known NPY receptor subtype. Thus it is possible that the ingestive effects of NPY and PYY are mediated by multiple or novel receptor subtypes in the hindbrain. And the relatively greater potency and efficacy of PYY raises the possibility that a novel PYY-preferring receptor in the hindbrain is involved in the stimulation of food intake.     

The cloned guinea pig neuropeptide Y receptor Y1 conforms to other mammalian Y1 receptors.

We have cloned the guinea pig neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptor and found it to be 92-93% identical to other cloned mammalian Y1 receptors. Porcine NPY and peptide YY (PYY) displayed affinities of 43 pM and 48 pM, respectively. NPY2-36 and NPY3-36 had 6- and 46-fold lower affinity, respectively, than intact NPY. Functional coupling was measured by using a microphysiometer. Human NPY and PYY were equipotent in causing extracellular acidification with EC50 values of 0.59 nM and 0.69 nM, respectively, whereas NPY2-36 and NPY3-36 were about 15-fold and 500-fold less potent, respectively, than NPY. The present study shows that the cloned guinea pig Y1 receptor is very similar to its orthologues in other mammals, both with respect to sequence and pharmacology. Thus, results from previous studies on guinea pig NPY receptors might imply the existence of an additional Y1-like receptor sensitive to B1BP3226.     

Neuropeptide Y receptor in bovine hippocampus is a Y2 receptor.

[125I]NPY bound to a single class of saturable binding sites on bovine hippocampus membranes with a KD of 0.1 mM and Bmax of 165 fmol/mg of protein. The rank order of potency of NPY fragments and other structurally related peptides to inhibit [125I]NPY binding was: PYY greater than or equal to NPY much greater than BPP greater than or equal to APP and NPY greater than NPY-(13-36) greater than NPY-(18-36) greater than or equal to NPY-(20-36) much greater than NPY-(26-36) greater than NPY-(free acid). The identity of the NPY binding site was investigated by affinity labeling. Gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography revealed a band with a mol mass of 50 kDa. Unlabeled NPY or PYY, but not BPP, HPP and APP, inhibited labeling of [125I]NPY to the 50 kDa protein band. Moreover, labeling was inhibited by NPY greater than NPY-(18-36) greater than or equal to NPY-(13-36) greater than or equal to NPY-(20-36) greater than NPY-(26-36) greater than NPY-(free acid). The binding of [125I]NPY and the intensity of the cross-linked band were reduced in parallel by increasing concentrations of unlabeled NPY (IC50 = 0.7 nM and 0.6 mM, respectively). These studies demonstrate that bovine hippocampal membranes contain a 50 kDa [125I]NPY binding site that has the ligand specificity characteristic of the Y2 receptor subtype.     

Cloning and characterization of the guinea pig neuropeptide Y receptor Y5

The Y5 receptor has been postulated to be the main receptor mediating NPY-induced food intake in rats, based on its pharmacological profile and mRNA distribution. To further characterize this important receptor subtype, we isolated the Y5 gene in the guinea pig, a widely used laboratory animal in which all other known NPY receptors (Y1, Y2, Y4, y6) [2,13,33,37] have recently been cloned by our group. Our results show that the Y5 receptor is well conserved between species; guinea pig Y5 displays 96% overall amino acid sequence identity to human Y5, the highest identity reported for any non-primate NPY receptor orthologue, regardless of subtype. Thirteen of the twenty substitutions occur in the large third cytoplasmic loop. The identities between the guinea pig Y5 receptor and the dog, rat, and mouse Y5 receptors are 93%, 89%, and 89% respectively. When transiently expressed in EBNA cells, the guinea pig Y5 receptor showed a high binding affinity to iodinated porcine PYY with a dissociation constant of 0.41 nM. Competition experiments showed that the rank order of potency for NPY-analogues was PYY = NPY = NPY2-36 > gpPP > rPP > NPY 22-36. Thus the pharmacological profile of the guinea pig Y5 receptor agrees well with that reported for the Y5 receptor from other cloned species.     

Neuropeptide Y induced modulation of dopamine synthesis in the striatum

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the activation of NPY receptors alters catecholamines (CA) synthesis in the central nervous system and, if so, to identify the NPY receptor subtype(s) mediating this effect. Tyrosine hydroxylation, the rate-limiting step in CA synthesis, was assessed by measuring the accumulation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenyalanine (DOPA) by high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC) in rat striatal dices following incubation of the tissue with the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor m-hydroxybenzyl hydrazine (NSD 1015). Treatment with NSD 1015 resulted in an increase in DOPA accumulation that was increased even further following depolarization with a high potassium (KCl) buffer. PYY13-36 and NPY13-36 both produced a significant enhancement of the KCl-induced increase in DOPA accumulation. The effect of PYY13-36 was completely attenuated by the selective Y2 antagonist BIIE0246 suggesting that activation of Y2 receptors enhanced the synthesis of dopamine. In contrast to the effects of NPY13-36 and PYY13-36; NPY, PYY and PYY3-36 all produced a significant attenuation of the KCl-induced increase in DOPA accumulation. The Y1 antagonist BIBO3304 and the Y5-antagonist CGP71683A, both prevented the inhibitory effect of NPY converting it to a stimulatory effect. The enhancement of the NPY induced increase in DOPA accumulation observed by BIBO3304 was attenuated when examined in the presence of the Y2 antagonist BIIE0246. These results suggest that activation of NPY receptors can modulate the synthesis of CA in the rat striatum. The Y1 and Y5 receptor appear to be involved in attenuation, while Y2 receptors are involved in the stimulation of synthesis.     

GPC receptors and not ligands decide the binding mode in neuropeptide Y multireceptor/multiligand system

Many G protein-coupled receptors belong to families of different receptor subtypes, which are recognized by a variety of distinct ligands. To study such a multireceptor/multiligand system, we investigated the Y-receptor family. This family consists of four G protein-coupled Y receptors in humans (hY 1R, hY 2R, hY 4R, and hY 5R) and is activated by the so-called NPY hormone family, which itself consists of three native peptide ligands named neuropeptide Y (NPY), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and peptide YY (PYY). The hY 5R shows high affinity for all ligands, although for PP binding, the affinity is slightly decreased. As a rational explanation, we suggest that Tyr (27) is lost as a contact point between PP and the hY 5R in contrast to NPY or PYY. Furthermore, several important residues for ligand binding were identified by the first extensive mutagenesis study of the hY 5R. Using a complementary mutagenesis approach, we were able to discover a novel interaction point between hY 5R and NPY. The interaction between NPY(Arg (25)) and hY 5R(Asp (2.68)) as well as between NPY(Arg (33)) and hY 5R(Asp (6.59)) is maintained in the binding of PYY and PP to hY 5R but different to the PP-hY 4R and NPY-hY 1R contact points. Therefore, we provide evidence that the receptor subtype and not the pre-orientated conformation of the ligand at the membrane decides the binding mode. Furthermore, the first hY 5R model was set up on the basis of the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin. We can show that most of the residues identified to be critical for ligand binding are located within the now postulated binding pocket.     

Characterization of NPY receptor subtypes Y2 and Y7 in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

We report the cloning and pharmacological characterization of two neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor subtypes, Y2 and Y7, in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). These subtypes are approximately 50% identical to each other and belong to the Y2 subfamily of NPY receptors. The binding properties of the receptors were investigated after expression in human HEK-293 EBNA cells. Both receptors bound the three zebrafish peptides NPY, PYYa, and PYYb, as well as porcine NPY and PYY, with affinities in the nanomolar range that are similar to mammalian Y2. The affinity of the truncated porcine NPY fragments, NPY 13-36 and NPY 18-36 was markedly lower compared to mammalian and chicken Y2. This suggests that mammalian and chicken Y2 are unique among NPY receptors in their ability to bind truncated peptide fragments. The antagonist BIIE0246, developed for mammalian Y2, did not bind either of the two rainbow trout receptors. Our results support the proposed expansion of this gene family by duplications before the gnathostome radiation. They also reveal appreciable differences in the repertoire and characteristics of NPY receptors between fish and tetrapods stressing the importance of lineage-specific gene loss as well as sequence divergence after duplication.     

Potent and selective tools to investigate neuropeptide Y receptors in the central and peripheral nervous systems: BIB03304 (Y1) and CGP71683A (Y5)

We have evaluated 3 newly developed neuropeptide Y receptor antagonists in various in vitro binding and bioassays: BIBO3304 (Y1), T4[NPY33-36]4 (Y2), and CGP71683A (Y5). In rat brain homogenates, BIBO3304 competes for the same population of [125I][Leu31,Pro34] peptide YY (PYY) binding sites (75%) as BIBP3226, but with a 10 fold greater affinity (IC50 of 0.2 +/- 0.04 nM for BIBO3304 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.07 nM for BIBP3226),while CGP71683A has high affinity for 25% of specific [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites. Both BIBO3304 and CGP71683A (at 1.0 microM) were unable to compete for a significant proportion of specific [125I]PYY3-36/Y2 sites. The purported Y2 antagonist T4[NPY33-36]4 competed against [125I]PYY3-36 binding sites with an affinity of 750 nM. These results were confirmed in HEK 293 cells transfected with either the rat Y1, Y2, Y4, or Y5 receptor cDNA. BIBO3304, but not CGP71683A, competed with high affinity for [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites in HEK 293 cells transfected with the rat Y1 receptor cDNA, whereas the reverse profile was observed upon transfection with the rat Y5 receptor cDNA. Additionally, both molecules were inactive at Y2 and Y4 receptor subtypes expressed in HEK 293 cells. Receptor autoradiographic studies revealed the presence of [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY/BIBO3304-insensitive sites in the rat brain as reported previously for BIBP3226. Finally, the selective antagonistic properties of BIBO3304 were demonstrated in a Y1 bioassay (rabbit saphenous vein; pA2 value of 9.04) while being inactive in Y2 (rat vas deferens) and Y4 (rat colon) bioassays. These results confirm the high affinity and selectivity of BIBO3304 and CGP71683A for the Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes, respectively, while the purported Y2 antagonist, T4[NPY33-36]4 possesses rather low affinity for this receptor.     

Y1 and Y2 receptors for neuropeptide Y

By using monoiodinated radioligands of both intact neuropeptide Y (NPY) and of a long C-terminal fragment, NPY13-36, two subtypes of binding sites, which differ in affinity and specificity, have been characterized. The Y1 type of binding site, characterized on a human neuroblastoma cell line, MC-IXC, and a rat pheochromocytoma cell line, PC-12, binds NPY with a dissociation constant (Kd) of a few nanomolar but does not bind NPY13-36. The Y2 type of binding site, characterized on porcine hippocampal membranes and on another human neuroblastoma cell line, SMS-MSN, is of higher affinity and binds both NPY and NPY13-36. None of the binding sites distinguish between NPY and the homologous peptide YY (PYY). It is concluded that NPY/PYY-binding sites occur in two subtypes which may represent two types of physiological receptors.     

Differential regulation of neuropeptide Y receptors in the brains of NPY knock-out mice

To study the effect of NPY deletion on the regulation of its receptors in the NPY knockout (NPY KO) mice, the expression and binding of NPY receptors were investigated by in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography using (125)I-[Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY and (125)I-PYY(3-36) as radioligands. A 6-fold increase in Y2 receptor mRNA was observed in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in NPY KO mice, but a significant change could not be detected for Y1, Y4, Y5 and y6 receptors. Receptor binding reveals a 60-400% increase of Y2 receptor binding in multiple brain areas. A similar increase in Y1 receptor binding was seen only in the hypothalamus. These results demonstrate the NPY receptor expression is altered in mice deficient for its natural ligand.     

Functional CCK-A and Y2 receptors in guinea pig esophagus

Effects of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8), peptide YY (PPY), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and their analogs on muscle contractions of esophageal strips were investigated. CCK-8 induced a tetrodotoxin and atropine-sensitive contraction. The relative potencies for CCK related peptides to induce contractions were CCK-8 > desulfated CCK-8 > gastrin-17-I. The CCK-A receptor antagonist L-364,718 was 300-fold more potent than the CCK-B receptor antagonist L-365,260 at inhibiting CCK-8-induced contraction. These indicate that neural CCK-A receptors mediate this contraction. PYY or NPY did not cause muscle contraction or inhibit muscle contraction induced by carbachol, endothelin-1 or KCl. However, both PYY and NPY concentration-dependently inhibited contraction induced by CCK-8. This inhibition was not affected by nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors L-NMMA or L-NAME. The relative potencies of PYY related peptides to inhibit CCK-8 induced contraction were PYY > NPY > NPY13-36 > [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY > pancreatic polypeptide (PP). We conclude that CCK interacts with neural CCK-A receptors to cause esophageal muscle contraction. PYY and NPY interact with Y2 receptors to inhibit this CCK-induced muscle contraction by an effect not related to NO.     

PYY preference is a common characteristic of neuropeptide Y receptors expressed in human, rat, and mouse gastrointestinal epithelia

This investigation describes the relative potencies of four peptide agonists, namely, peptide YY (PYY), [Leu3l,Pro34]PYY (Pro34pYY), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (Pro34NPY), as antisecretory agents in human, rat, and mouse gastrointestinal preparations. The inhibition of agonist responses by the Y1-receptor antagonist BIBP 3226 was also tested in each preparation. An unexpectedly pronounced preference for PYY and Pro34PYY was observed in functional studies of two human epithelial lines stably transfected with the rat Y1 receptor (Y1-7 and C1Y1-6). NPY and Pro34NPY were at least an order of magnitude less effective than PYY in these functional studies but were only marginally less potent in displacement binding studies using membrane preparations of the same clonal lines. The orders of agonist potency obtained in Y1-7 and C1Y1-6 epithelia were compared with those obtained from a single human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line (Colony-6, which constitutively expresses Y1 receptors) and also from mucosal preparations of rat and mouse descending colon. Similar peptide orders of potency were obtained in rat and mouse colonic mucosae and Colony-6 epithelia, all of which exhibited PYY preference (although less pronounced than with Y1-7 and C1Y1-6 epithelia) and significant sensitivity to the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226. We have compared the pharmacology of these five mammalian epithelial preparations and provide cautionary evidence against the reliance upon agonist concentration-response relationships alone, in the characterization of NPY receptor types.     

Existence of both neuropeptide Y, Y1 and Y2 receptors in pig spleen: evidence using subtype-selective antagonists in vivo

The effects of the first selective, non-peptide, NPY Y2 receptor antagonist (S)-N2-[[1-[2-[4-[(R,S)-5,11-dihydro-6(6h)-oxodibenz[b,e]azepin-11-yl]-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethyl]cyclopentyl]acetyl]-N-[2-[1,2-dihydro-3,5 (4H)-dioxo-1,2-diphenyl-3H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl]ethyl]-argininamid (BIIE0246) were studied on splenic vascular responses evoked in the pig in vivo. BIIE0246 abolished the splenic vasoconstrictor response to the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu25Leu31]NPY(24-36), but did not affect the response to the NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34]NPY, which in turn was abolished by the selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist (2R)-5-([amino(imino)methyl]amino)-2-[(2,2-diphenylacetyl)amino]-N-[(IR)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-pentanamide (H 409/22). Furthermore, the PYY-evoked splenic vasoconstrictor response was partially antagonized by BIIE0246 and subsequently almost abolished by the addition of H 409/22. It is concluded that BIIE0246 exerts selective (vs the NPY Y1 receptor) NPY Y2 receptor antagonism, and thus represents an interesting tool for classification of NPY receptors, in vivo. In addition, evidence for NPY Y2 receptor mediated vasoconstriction was presented. Furthermore, both NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors are involved in the splenic vasoconstrictor response to PYY.     

Identification of cultured cells selectively expressing Y1-, Y2-, or Y3-type receptors for neuropeptide Y/peptide YY.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) are homologous 36 amino acid amidated peptides that often, but not always, exert similar actions and binding profiles. The present study of cultured cells confirms that both peptides as well as radioiodinated analogs, i.e. 125I-Bolton-Hunter-NPY (125I-BH-NPY) and 125I-peptide YY (125I-PYY), show high affinity to binding sites/receptors of the previously proposed Y1- and Y2-subtypes, selectively expressed by the human neuroblastoma cell lines, SK-N-MC and SK-N-BE(2), respectively. In contrast, bovine adrenal chromaffin cells did not bind 125I-PYY, while displaying high affinity 125I-BH-NPY sites, and may therefore represent a cell type expressing a recently proposed Y3-type of (NPY-preferring) receptors. Several non-labeled fragments/analogs have been used in displacement experiments to further characterize the structural requirements for Y1-, Y2-, and Y3-type binding. In every instance, specific binding was reduced by addition of 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate [Gpp(NH)p], indicating that the three receptor subtypes belong to the G-protein-coupled superfamily of receptors. Moreover, in both neuroblastoma cell lines, the peptides elicited, with appropriate orders of potency, reduction of forskolin-stimulated adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation. Finally, NPY-evoked 45Ca2+ influx was observed in SK-N-MC and in chromaffin cells. A common dual coupling mechanism of NPY/PYY receptors, i.e. to reduction of cAMP and to Ca2+ elevation, is therefore suggested to exist, although both phenomena could not be demonstrated in every cell type.     

Multiple Y receptors mediate pancreatic polypeptide responses in mouse colon mucosa

A functional study has been performed to characterise the Y receptors responsible for NPY, PYY and PP-stimulated responses in mouse colonic mucosal preparations. Electrogenic ion secretion was stimulated with VIP following which NPY, PYY and PP analogues were, to varying degrees, inhibitory. PYY(3-36), hPP, Gln(23)hPP and rPP were effective but less potent than full length PYY, NPY or their Pro(34)-substituted analogues, while the Y(5) agonist Ala(31), Aib(32)hNPY was the least active peptide tested. The Y(1) antagonists, BIBP3226 and BIBO3304 virtually abolished Pro(34)PYY and PYY responses while PYY(3-36) responses were selectively inhibited by the Y(2) antagonist, BIIE0246. A combination of BIBO3304 and BIIE0246 also partially attenuated hPP responses, leaving residual effects that were most probably Y(4)-mediated. Thus we conclude that Y(1), Y(2) and Y(4) receptors attenuate ion secretion in mouse colon.     

Identification of selective neuropeptide Y2 peptide agonists

Activation of the NPY2 receptor to reduce appetite while avoiding stimulation of the NPY1 and NPY5 receptors that induce feeding provides a pharmaceutical approach to modulate food intake. The naturally occurring peptide PYY(3-36) is a nonselective NPY1, NPY2, and NPY5 agonist. N-terminal truncation of PYY to abrogate affinity for the NPY1 and NPY5 receptors and subsequent N-terminal modification with aminobenzoic analogs to restore NPY2 receptor potency results in a series of highly selective NPY2 receptor peptide agonists.     

Determination of affinity and activity of ligands at the human neuropeptide Y Y4 receptor by flow cytometry and aequorin luminescence

Fluorescence-labeled neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been used in flow cytometric binding assays for the determination of affinity constants of NPY Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptor ligands. Because the binding of fluorescent NPY is insufficient for competition studies at the human Y4 receptor (hY4R), we replaced Glu-4 in hPP with Lys for the derivatization with cyanine-5. Because cy5-[K(4)]hPP has high affinity (Kd 5.6 nM) to the hY4R, it was used as a probe in a flow cytometric binding assay. Specific binding of cy5-[K(4)]hPP to hY4R was visualized by confocal microscopy. The hY(4)R, the chimeric G protein G(qi5) and mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin were stably coexpressed in CHO cells. Aequorin luminescence was quantified in a microplate reader and by a CCD camera. By application of these methods 3-cyclohexyl-N-[(3-1H-imidazol-4-ylpropylamino)(imino)methyl]propanamide (UR-AK49) was discovered as the first nonpeptidic Y4R antagonist (pKi 4.17), a lead to be optimized in terms of potency and selectivity.     

Homodimerization of neuropeptide y receptors investigated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer in living cells

Up to now neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors, which belong to the large family of G-protein-coupled receptors and are involved in a broad range of physiological processes, are believed to act as monomers. Studies with the Y(1)-receptor antagonist and Y(4)-receptor agonist GR231118, which binds with a 250-fold higher affinity than its monomer, led to the first speculation that NPY receptors can form homodimers. In the present work we used the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to study homodimerization of the hY(1)-, hY(2)-, and hY(5)-receptors in living cells. For this purpose, we generated fusion proteins of NPY receptors and green fluorescent protein or spectral variants of green fluorescent protein (cyan, yellow, and red fluorescent protein), which can be used as FRET pairs. Two different FRET techniques, fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy, were applied. Both techniques clearly showed that the hY(1)-, hY(2)-, and hY(5)-NPY receptor subtypes are able to form homodimers. By using transiently transfected cells, as well as a stable cell line expressing the hY(2)-GFP fusion protein, we could demonstrate that the Y-GFP fusion proteins are still functional and that dimerization varies from 26 to 44% dependent on the receptor. However, homodimerization is influenced neither by NPY nor by Galpha protein binding.