Expression of progesterone receptor isoforms A and B is differentially regulated by estrogen in different breast cancer cell lines

Progesterone action in target tissues is mediated through two progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, which display different regulatory functions in target cells. Relative expression ratio of these isoforms varies depending on cell and tissue types. Here, we studied the regulation of PR isoform expression by estradiol (E(2)), insulin, IGF-1 and cAMP in different breast cancer cell lines. Although, E(2) induced PR expression in all cell lines studied, the expression ratio of PR-A/PR-B induced by E(2) was dependent on the cell line. The differential regulation of the isoforms was also seen at the mRNA level suggesting that the PR-A and PR-B promoters are differentially regulated by E(2) in different breast cancer cells. Insulin, IGF-1 or cAMP previously reported to induce PR expression however failed to alter the PR expression in our study. This is the first report describing that in different breast cancer cell lines the expression of PR-A and PR-B is regulated by E(2) in a distinct way.     

Differential expression of uterine progesterone receptor forms A and B during the menstrual cycle

Recent studies suggest that the progesterone receptor isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) activate genes differentially and that PR-A may act as a repressor of PR-B function. Hence, the absolute and relative expression of the two isoforms will determine the response to progesterone. We have measured their relative expression in the uterus of cycling women who underwent endometrial biopsy. PR isoforms were identified on blots of SDS-PAGE gels by reaction with the AB-52 antibody after immunoprecipitation from endometrial extract. Both isoforms were highest in the peri-ovulatory phase, but levels of PR-A were always higher than those of PR-B. The ratio of PR-A to PR-B changed during the menstrual cycle. Between days 2 and 8, PR-B is almost undetectable and the A:B ratio is >10:1. From days 9 to 13, the ratio is about 5:1, and it is about 2:1 between days 14 and 16. Thereafter, PR-B dwindles rapidly and is virtually undetectable at the end of the cycle. In various hypoestrogenic environments, PR-B expression was reduced. However, exogenous estrogens in the follicular phase in the form of oral contraceptives, enhanced PR-B expression. These data support the possibility that progesterone acts through cycle-specific PR isoforms.     

Role of progesterone receptors during postpartum estrus in rats

We studied the role of progesterone receptor (PR) in the display of female sexual behavior during postpartum estrus in rats. Adult female rats were treated with the PR antagonist, RU486 (1.25 and 5 mg), 3 h after parturition and sexual behavior was evaluated throughout the first postpartum day. Estradiol and progesterone serum levels changed during the first 24 h postpartum. The highest estradiol and progesterone levels were found at 9 and 12 h postpartum, respectively. The predominant PR isoform in the hypothalamus and the preoptic area was PR-A during postpartum day. The content of PR-A increased at 6 h postpartum in the hypothalamus and the preoptic area, and decreased in both regions at 9 h. PR-B content only increased in the preoptic area at 12 h postpartum. The highest display of lordotic and proceptive behaviors were found at 12 h postpartum. The treatment with 1.25 and 5 mg of RU486 respectively reduced lordosis by 61% and 92% at 12 h postpartum. These results suggest that PR is essential in the display of postpartum estrus in rats.     

Nuclear progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in mouse fallopian tube and uterus: implications for expression, regulation, and cellular function

Progesterone and its interaction with nuclear progesterone receptors (PR) PR-A and PR-B play a critical role in the regulation of female reproductive function in all mammals. However, our knowledge of the regulation and possible cellular function of PR protein isoforms in the fallopian tube and uterus in vivo is still very limited. In the present study, we revealed that equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) treatment resulted in a time-dependent increase in expression of both isoforms, reaching a maximal level at 48 h in the fallopian tube. Regulation of PR-A protein expression paralleled that of PR-B protein expression. However, in the uterus PR-B protein levels increased and peaked earlier than PR-A protein levels after eCG treatment. With prolonged exposure to eCG, PR-B protein levels decreased, whereas PR-A protein levels continued to increase. Furthermore, subsequent treatment with human (h)CG decreased the levels of PR protein isoforms in both tissues in parallel with increased endogenous serum progesterone levels. To further elucidate whether progesterone regulates PR protein isoforms, we demonstrated that a time-dependent treatment with progesterone (P(4)) decreased the expression of PR protein isoforms in both tissues, whereas decreases in p27, cyclin D(2), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen protein levels were observed only in the uterus. To define the potential PR-mediated effects on apoptosis, we demonstrated that the PR antagonist treatment increased the levels of PR protein isoforms, induced mitochondrial-associated apoptosis, and decreased in epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGF receptor protein expression in both tissues. Interestingly, immunohistochemistry indicated that the induction of apoptosis by PR antagonists was predominant in the epithelium, whereas increase in PR protein expression was observed in stromal cells of both tissues. Taken together, these observations suggest that 1) the tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of PR isoform expression in mouse fallopian tube and uterus, where they are potentially involved in regulation of mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis depending on the cellular compartment; and 2) a possible interaction between functional PR protein and growth factor signaling may have a coordinated role for regulating apoptotic process in both tissues in vivo.     

Progesterone-independent effects of human progesterone receptors (PRs) in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: PR isoform-specific gene regulation and tumor biology

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are prognostic markers in breast cancers irrespective of the patient's progestational status. However, there are two PR isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, that are equimolar in the normal breast but dysregulated in advanced disease. Postmenopausal, tamoxifen-treated patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, PR-A-rich tumors have much faster disease recurrence than patients with PR-B-rich tumors. To study the mechanisms we engineered ER+ breast cancer cells that express each PR isoform under control of an inducible promoter. We identified 79 genes regulated by progesterone (P), mainly by PR-B, and 51 genes regulated without progesterone, mainly by PR-A. Only nine genes were regulated with and without ligand, leading to definition of three classes: I) genes regulated only by liganded PR; II) genes regulated only by unliganded PR; III) genes regulated by both. Unliganded PR-A and PR-B differentially regulate genes that coordinate extracellular signaling pathways and influence tumor cell biology. Indeed, in the absence of P, compared with ER+/PR-B+ or PR- cells, ER+, PR-A+ cells exhibit an aggressive phenotype, are more adhesive to an extracellular matrix, and are more migratory. Additionally, unliganded PR-A and PR-B both inhibit cell growth and provoke resistance to Taxol-induced apoptosis. We propose that PR-A:PR-B ratios, even in the absence of P, influence the biology and treatment response of ER+ tumors, that PR-A isoforms are functionally dominant in P-deficient states, and that PR-A rich tumors are especially aggressive.     

Ontogenic variations in the content and distribution of progesterone receptor isoforms in the reproductive tract and brain of chicks

Progesterone participates in the regulation of several functions in chicks such as ovulation, gonadal differentiation, and sexual and nesting behaviors. Many progesterone actions are mediated by specific intracellular receptors (PR) which are ligand-induced transactivators. Two PR isoforms that are functionally distinct in their ability to activate genes and regulate distinct physiological processes have been described in chicks: a full length form PR-B and the N-terminally truncated one PR-A which lacks the amino-terminal 128 amino acids of PR-B. PR isoforms have been detected in several tissues of both the adult and the embryo chick such as brain, ovary and oviduct. PR isoforms expression ratio varies among progesterone target tissues and under different hormonal and environmental conditions such as those presented during avian sexual maturity and the seasons of the year. These data let us to conclude that progesterone actions in brain, ovary, and oviduct highly depend on PR isoforms expression pattern and regulation.     

Functional properties of the N-terminal region of progesterone receptors and their mechanistic relationship to structure

Progesterone receptors (PR) are present in two isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The B-upstream segment (BUS) of PR-B is a 164 amino acid N-terminal extension that is missing in PR-A and is responsible for the functional differences reported between the two isoforms. BUS contains an activation function (AF3) which is defined by a core domain between residues 54–154 whose activity is dependent upon a single Trp residue and two LXXLL motifs. We have also identified sites both within and outside of BUS that repress the strong synergism between AF3 and AF1 in the N-terminal region and AF2 in the hormone binding domain. One of these repressor sites is a consensus binding motif for the small ubiquitin-like modifier protein, SUMO-1 (³⁸⁷IKEE). The DNA binding domain (DBD) structure is also important for function. When BUS is linked to the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, AF3 activity is substantially attenuated, suggesting that binding to a DNA response element results in allosteric communication between the DBD and N-terminal functional regions. Lastly, biochemical and biophysical analyses of highly purified PR-B and PR-A N-terminal regions reveal that they are unstructured unless the DBD is present. Thus, the DBD stabilizes N-terminal structure. We propose a model in which the DBD through DNA binding, and BUS through protein–protein interactions, stabilize active receptor conformers within an ensemble distribution of active and inactive conformational states. This would explain why PR-B are stronger transactivators than PR-A.     

Hormone-dependent changes in A and B forms of progesterone receptor

The influence of different estrogen and/or progesterone treatments on concentrations of A and B forms of progesterone receptor (PR-A and PR-B) in the different cell types of chick oviduct was studied. A semiquantitative immunohistochemical assay for cellular PR concentrations was developed using a computer-assisted image analysis system. The staining intensity of nuclear PR in the basal layer of epithelial cells, glandular, smooth muscle and mesothelial cells was analysed separately using two monoclonal antibodies, PR6 and PR22. The measured concentrations of PR varied between different cell types and from cell to cell. A significant decrease in PR concentration, as noted by a decrease in staining intensity, was observed in all cell types studied 2 or 6 h after a single injection of progesterone with or without simultaneous estrogen administration. The decrease was also verified with immunoblotting and an immunoenzymometric assay (IEMA) for chicken PR. After down-regulation the concentration of PR recovered to the control level within 48 h after progesterone or estrogen administration. Estrogen administration alone was observed to cause changes in the concentration of PR-A only, having little or no effect on PR-B concentration depending on the cell type studied.

These findings indicate that estrogen and progesterone cause cell-specific changes not only to the total concentration of PR but also to the cellular ratio of PR-A and PR-B.     

Significance of progesterone receptor-A and -B expressions in endometrial adenocarcinoma

The progesterone receptor (PR) has two isoforms, A and B, among which PR-B is mainly involved in regulating proliferation of the uterine endometrium. In this study, immunohistochemical analysis was carried out to investigate the correlation of PR-A and -B expressions with cell cycle-regulatory proteins and clinicopathological parameters in endometrial adenocarcinoma. One hundred and forty-one endometrioid adenocarcinomas [76 with well-differentiated (G1), 35 with moderately differentiated (G2) and 30 with poorly differentiated (G3)] were used. Specimens of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue were immunohistochemically stained using the high polymer method (HISTOFINE, NICHIREI). The percentage of positive nuclei of tumor cells observed in three high power fields was expressed as a labeling index (LI). PR-B expression significantly occurred more frequently in G1. It was inversely correlated with p53 gene mutation and p53 over expression, and also with clinicopathological variables, including myometrial and lymph-vascular space invasion and the FIGO stage. Patients with negative PR-B had a poorer prognosis than positive cases. PR-A expression was also significantly higher in G1 and was inversely correlated with Ki-67 expression and myometrial invasion, but not with prognosis. PR-A and -B expressions were significantly correlated with biologically malignant potential. Especially, PR-B expression is useful as a prognostic indicator of endometrial adenocarcinoma.