The proximal intestinal Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins liver FABP (LFABP) and intestinal FABP (IFABP) differentially modulate whole body energy homeostasis but are not centrally involved in net dietary lipid absorption: Studies of the LFABP/IFABP double knockout mouse

Proximal intestinal enterocytes expresses both intestinal-fatty acid binding protein (IFABP; FABP2) and liver-FABP (LFABP; FABP1). These FABPs are thought to be important in the net uptake of dietary lipid from the intestinal lumen, however their specific and potentially unique functions in the enterocyte remain incompletely understood. We previously showed markedly divergent phenotypes in LFABP^?/? vs. IFABP^?/? mice fed high-fat diets, with the former becoming obese and the latter remaining lean relative to wild-type (WT) mice, supporting different functional roles for each protein. Interestingly, neither mouse model displayed increased fecal lipid concentration, raising the question of whether the presence of one FABP was sufficient to compensate for absence of the other. Here, we generated an LFABP and IFABP double knockout mouse (DKO) to determine whether simultaneous ablation would lead to fat malabsorption, and to further interrogate the individual vs. overlapping functions of these proteins. Male WT, IFABP^?/?, LFABP^?/?, and DKO mice were fed a low-fat (10 % kcal) or high-fat (45 % kcal) diet for 12 weeks. The body weights and fat mass of the DKO mice integrated those of the LFABP^?/? and IFABP^?/? single knockouts, supporting the notion that IFABP and LFABP have distinct functions in intestinal lipid assimilation that result in downstream alterations in systemic energy metabolism. Remarkably, no differences in fecal fat concentrations were found in the DKO compared to WT, revealing that the FABPs are not required for net intestinal uptake of dietary lipid.     

FABP1 knockdown in human enterocytes impairs proliferation and alters lipid metabolism

Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins (FABPs) are abundant intracellular proteins that bind long chain fatty acids (FA) and have been related with inmunometabolic diseases. Intestinal epithelial cells express two isoforms of FABPs: liver FABP (LFABP or FABP1) and intestinal FABP (IFABP or FABP2). They are thought to be associated with intracellular dietary lipid transport and trafficking towards diverse cell fates. But still their specific functions are not well understood.To study FABP1's functions, we generated an FABP1 knockdown model in Caco-2 cell line by stable antisense cDNA transfection (FABP1as). In these cells FABP1 expression was reduced up to 87%. No compensatory increase in FABP2 was observed, strengthening the idea of differential functions of both isoforms. In differentiated FABP1as cells, apical administration of oleate showed a decrease in its initial uptake rate and in long term incorporation compared with control cells. FABP1 depletion also reduced basolateral oleate secretion. The secreted oleate distribution showed an increase in FA/triacylglyceride ratio compared to control cells, probably due to FABP1's role in chylomicron assembly. Interestingly, FABP1as cells exhibited a dramatic decrease in proliferation rate. A reduction in oleate uptake as well as a decrease in its incorporation into the phospholipid fraction was observed in proliferating cells.Overall, our studies indicate that FABP1 is essential for proper lipid metabolism in differentiated enterocytes, particularly concerning fatty acids uptake and its basolateral secretion. Moreover, we show that FABP1 is required for enterocyte proliferation, suggesting that it may contribute to intestinal homeostasis.     

Two fatty acid‐binding proteins expressed in the intestine interact differently with endocannabinoids

Two different members of the fatty acid‐binding protein (FABP) family are found in enterocyte cells of the gastrointestinal system, namely liver‐type and intestinal fatty acid‐binding proteins (LFABP and IFABP, also called FABP1 and FABP2, respectively). Striking phenotypic differences have been observed in knockout mice for either protein, for example, high fat‐fed IFABP‐null mice remained lean, whereas LFABP‐null mice were obese, correlating with differences in food intake. This finding prompted us to investigate the role each protein plays in directing the specificity of binding to ligands involved in appetite regulation, such as fatty acid ethanolamides and related endocannabinoids. We determined the binding affinities for nine structurally related ligands using a fluorescence competition assay, revealing tighter binding to IFABP than LFABP for all ligands tested. We found that the head group of the ligand had more impact on binding affinity than the alkyl chain, with the strongest binding observed for the carboxyl group, followed by the amide, and then the glycerol ester. These trends were confirmed using two‐dimensional ¹H–¹⁵N nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to monitor chemical shift perturbation of the protein backbone resonances upon titration with ligand. Interestingly, the NMR data revealed that different residues of IFABP were involved in the coordination of endocannabinoids than those implicated for fatty acids, whereas the same residues of LFABP were involved for both classes of ligand. In addition, we identified residues that are uniquely affected by binding of all types of ligand to IFABP, suggesting a rationale for its tighter binding affinity compared with LFABP.     

Direct Comparison of Mice Null for Liver or Intestinal Fatty Acid-binding Proteins Reveals Highly Divergent Phenotypic Responses to High Fat Feeding

The enterocyte expresses two fatty acid-binding proteins (FABP), intestinal FABP (IFABP; FABP2) and liver FABP (LFABP; FABP1). LFABP is also expressed in liver. Despite ligand transport and binding differences, it has remained uncertain whether these intestinally coexpressed proteins, which both bind long chain fatty acids (FA), are functionally distinct. Here, we directly compared IFABP^−/− and LFABP^−/− mice fed high fat diets containing long chain saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, reasoning that providing an abundance of dietary lipid would reveal unique functional properties. The results showed that mucosal lipid metabolism was indeed differentially modified, with significant decreases in FA incorporation into triacylglycerol (TG) relative to phospholipid (PL) in IFABP^−/− mice, whereas LFABP^−/− mice had reduced monoacylglycerol incorporation in TG relative to PL, as well as reduced FA oxidation. Interestingly, striking differences were found in whole body energy homeostasis; LFABP^−/− mice fed high fat diets became obese relative to WT, whereas IFABP^−/− mice displayed an opposite, lean phenotype. Fuel utilization followed adiposity, with LFABP^−/− mice preferentially utilizing lipids, and IFABP^−/− mice preferentially metabolizing carbohydrate for energy production. Changes in body weight and fat may arise, in part, from altered food intake; mucosal levels of the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoylglycerol and arachidonoylethanolamine were elevated in LFABP^−/−, perhaps contributing to increased energy intake. This direct comparison provides evidence that LFABP and IFABP have distinct roles in intestinal lipid metabolism; differential intracellular functions in intestine and in liver, for LFABP^−/− mice, result in divergent downstream effects at the systemic level.     

The integrity of the alpha-helical domain of intestinal fatty acid binding protein is essential for the collision-mediated transfer of fatty acids to phospholipid membranes

Intestinal FABP (IFABP) and liver FABP (LFABP), homologous proteins expressed at high levels in intestinal absorptive cells, employ markedly different mechanisms of fatty acid transfer to acceptor model membranes. Transfer from IFABP occurs during protein-membrane collisional interactions, while for LFABP transfer occurs by diffusion through the aqueous phase. In addition, transfer from IFABP is markedly faster than from LFABP. The overall goal of this study was to further explore the structural differences between IFABP and LFABP which underlie their large functional differences in ligand transport. In particular, we addressed the role of the alphaI-helix domain in the unique transport properties of intestinal FABP. A chimeric protein was engineered with the 'body' (ligand binding domain) of IFABP and the alphaI-helix of LFABP (alpha(I)LbetaIFABP), and the fatty acid transfer properties of the chimeric FABP were examined using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay. The results showed a significant decrease in the absolute rate of FA transfer from alpha(I)LbetaIFABP compared to IFABP. The results indicate that the alphaI-helix is crucial for IFABP collisional FA transfer, and further indicate the participation of the alphaII-helix in the formation of a protein-membrane "collisional complex". Photo-crosslinking experiments with a photoactivable reagent demonstrated the direct interaction of IFABP with membranes and further support the importance of the alphaI helix of IFABP in its physical interaction with membranes.     

Interaction of enterocyte FABPs with phospholipid membranes: clues for specific physiological roles

Intestinal and liver fatty acid binding proteins (IFABP and LFABP, respectively) are cytosolic soluble proteins with the capacity to bind and transport hydrophobic ligands between different sub-cellular compartments. Their functions are still not clear but they are supposed to be involved in lipid trafficking and metabolism, cell growth, and regulation of several other processes, like cell differentiation. Here we investigated the interaction of these proteins with different models of phospholipid membrane vesicles in order to achieve further insight into their specificity within the enterocyte. A combination of biophysical and biochemical techniques allowed us to determine affinities of these proteins to membranes, the way phospholipid composition and vesicle size and curvature modulate such interaction, as well as the effect of protein binding on the integrity of the membrane structure. We demonstrate here that, besides their apparently opposite ligand transfer mechanisms, both LFABP and IFABP are able to interact with phospholipid membranes, but the factors that modulate such interactions are different for each protein, further implying different roles for IFABP and LFABP in the intracellular context. These results contribute to the proposed central role of intestinal FABPs in the lipid traffic within enterocytes as well as in the regulation of more complex cellular processes.     

The alpha-helical domain of liver fatty acid binding protein is responsible for the diffusion-mediated transfer of fatty acids to phospholipid membranes

Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (IFABP) and liver FABP (LFABP), homologous proteins expressed at high levels in intestinal absorptive cells, employ markedly different mechanisms for the transfer of fatty acids (FAs) to acceptor membranes. Transfer from IFABP occurs during protein-membrane collisional interactions, while for LFABP, transfer occurs by diffusion through the aqueous phase. Earlier, we had shown that the helical domain of IFABP is critical in determining its collisional FA transfer mechanism. In the study presented here, we have engineered a pair of chimeric proteins, one with the "body" (ligand binding domain) of IFABP and the alpha-helical region of LFABP (alphaLbetaIFABP) and the other with the ligand binding pocket of LFABP and the helical domain of IFABP (alphaIbetaLFABP). The objective of this work was to determine whether the change in the alpha-helical domain of each FABP would alter the rate and mechanism of transfer of FA from the chimeric proteins in comparison with those of the wild-type proteins. The fatty acid transfer properties of the FABP chimeras were examined using a fluorescence resonance transfer assay. The results showed a significant modification of the absolute rate of FA transfer from the chimeric proteins compared to that of the wild type, indicating that the slower rate of FA transfer observed for wild-type LFABP relative to that of wild-type IFABP is, in part, determined by the helical domain of the proteins. In addition to these quantitative changes, it was of great interest to observe that the apparent mechanism of FA transfer also changed when the alpha-helical domain was exchanged, with transfer from alphaLbetaIFABP occurring by aqueous diffusion and transfer from alphaIbetaLFABP occurring via protein-membrane collisional interactions. These results demonstrate that the alpha-helical region of LFABP is responsible for its diffusional mechanism of fatty acid transfer to membranes.     

Similar mechanisms of fatty acid transfer from human anal rodent fatty acid-binding proteins to membranes: Liver,intestine, heart muscle,and adipose tissue FABPs

The mammalian fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are thought to be important for the transport and metabolism of fatty acids in numerous cell types. The transfer of FA from different members of the FABP family to membranes has been shown to occur by two distinct mechanisms, an aqueous diffusion-based mechanism and a collisional mechanism, wherein the FABP interacts directly with membrane acceptors. Much of the work that underlies this concept comes from efforts using rodent FABPs. Given the increasing awareness of links between FABPs and several chronic diseases in humans, it was important to establish the mechanisms of FA transfer for human FABPs. In the present studies, we examined the rate and mechanism of fatty acid transfer from four pairs of human and rodent (rat or mouse, as specified) FABPs: hLFABP and rLFABP, hIFABP and rIFABP, hHFABP and rHFABP, and hAFABP and mAFABP. In the case of human IFABP, both the Ala⁵⁴ and Thr⁵⁴ forms were examined. The results show clearly that for all FABPs examined, the mechanisms of ligand transfer observed for rodent proteins hold true for their human counterparts. Moreover, it appears that the Ala to Thr substitution at residue 54 of the human IFABP does not alter the fundamental mechanism of ligand transfer to membranes, but nevertheless causes a consistent decrease in the rate of transfer.     

Fatty acid-binding proteins--insights from genetic manipulations

Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) belong to the conserved multigene family of the intracellular lipid-binding proteins (iLBPs). These proteins are ubiquitously expressed in vertebrate tissues, with distinct expression patterns for the individual FABPs. Various functions have been proposed for these proteins, including the promotion of cellular uptake and transport of fatty acids, the targeting of fatty acids to specific metabolic pathways, and the participation in the regulation of gene expression and cell growth. Novel genetic tools that have become available in recent years, such as transgenic cell lines, animals, and knock-out mice, have provided the opportunity to test these concepts in physiological settings. Such studies have helped to define essential cellular functions of individual FABP-types or of combinations of several different FABPs. The deletion of particular FABP genes, however, has not led to gross phenotypical changes, most likely because of compensatory overexpression of other members of the iLBP gene family, or even of unrelated fatty acid transport proteins. This review summarizes the properties of the various FABPs expressed in mammalian tissues, and discusses the transgenic and ablation studies carried out to date in a functional context.     

Liver Fatty Acid-binding Protein Binds Monoacylglycerol in Vitro and in Mouse Liver Cytosol

Liver fatty acid-binding protein (LFABP; FABP1) is expressed both in liver and intestinal mucosa. Mice null for LFABP were recently shown to have altered metabolism of not only fatty acids but also monoacylglycerol, the two major products of dietary triacylglycerol hydrolysis (Lagakos, W. S., Gajda, A. M., Agellon, L., Binas, B., Choi, V., Mandap, B., Russnak, T., Zhou, Y. X., and Storch, J. (2011) Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 300, G803–G814). Nevertheless, the binding and transport of monoacylglycerol (MG) by LFABP are uncertain, with conflicting reports in the literature as to whether this single chain amphiphile is in fact bound by LFABP. In the present studies, gel filtration chromatography of liver cytosol from LFABP^−/− mice shows the absence of the low molecular weight peak of radiolabeled monoolein present in the fractions that contain LFABP in cytosol from wild type mice, indicating that LFABP binds sn-2 MG in vivo. Furthermore, solution-state NMR spectroscopy demonstrates two molecules of sn-2 monoolein bound in the LFABP binding pocket in positions similar to those found for oleate binding. Equilibrium binding affinities are ∼2-fold lower for MG compared with fatty acid. Finally, kinetic studies examining the transfer of a fluorescent MG analog show that the rate of transfer of MG is 7-fold faster from LFABP to phospholipid membranes than from membranes to membranes and occurs by an aqueous diffusion mechanism. These results provide strong support for monoacylglycerol as a physiological ligand for LFABP and further suggest that LFABP functions in the efficient intracellular transport of MG.     

Effects of an Ala54Thr polymorphism in the intestinal fatty acid-binding protein on responses to dietary fat in humans

A polymorphism in FABP2 that results in an alanine-to-threonine substitution at amino acid 54 of the intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (IFABP) is associated with insulin resistance in Pima Indians. In vitro, the threonine form (Thr54) has a higher binding affinity for long-chain fatty acids than does the alanine form (Ala54). We tested whether this polymorphism affected metabolic responses to dietary fat, in vivo. Eighteen healthy Pima Indians, half homozygous for the Thr54 form of IFABP and half homozygous for the Ala54 form, were studied. The groups were matched for sex, age, and body mass index. Plasma triglyceride, nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA), glucose, and insulin responses were measured after a mixed meal (35% of daily energy requirements, 50 g of fat) and after a high fat challenge (1362 kcal, 129 g of fat). NEFA concentrations were approximately 15% higher after the mixed meal and peaked earlier and were approximately 20% higher at 7 h in response to the high fat test meal in Thr54 homozygotes compared with Ala54 homozygotes. Insulin responses to the test meals tended to be higher in Thr54 homozygotes, but glucose and triglyceride responses were not different.The results of this study suggest that the Thr54 form of IFABP is associated with higher and prolonged NEFA responses to dietary fat in vivo. Higher NEFA concentrations may contribute to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in individuals with this allele.     

Cytoplasmic fatty acid-binding proteins: emerging roles in metabolism and atherosclerosis

Cytoplasmic fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are a family of proteins, expressed in a tissue-specific manner, that bind fatty acid ligands and are involved in shuttling fatty acids to cellular compartments, modulating intracellular lipid metabolism, and regulating gene expression. Several members of the FABP family have been shown to have important roles in regulating metabolism and have links to the development of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. Recent studies demonstrate a role for intestinal FABP in the control of dietary fatty acid absorption and chylomicron secretion. Heart FABP is essential for normal myocardial fatty acid oxidation and modulates fatty acid uptake in skeletal muscle. Liver FABP is directly involved in fatty acid ligand signaling to the nucleus and interacts with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in hepatocytes. The adipocyte FABP (aP2) has been shown to affect insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism and lipolysis, and has recently been shown to play an important role in atherosclerosis. Interestingly, expression of aP2 by the macrophage promotes atherogenesis, thus providing a link between insulin resistance, intracellular fatty acid disposition, and foam cell formation. The FABPs are promising targets for the treatment of dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and atherosclerosis in humans.     

Tissue-specific Functions in the Fatty Acid-binding Protein Family

The intracellular fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are abundantly expressed in almost all tissues. They exhibit high affinity binding of a single long-chain fatty acid, with the exception of liver FABP, which binds two fatty acids or other hydrophobic molecules. FABPs have highly similar tertiary structures consisting of a 10-stranded antiparallel β-barrel and an N-terminal helix-turn-helix motif. Research emerging in the last decade has suggested that FABPs have tissue-specific functions that reflect tissue-specific aspects of lipid and fatty acid metabolism. Proposed roles for FABPs include assimilation of dietary lipids in the intestine, targeting of liver lipids to catabolic and anabolic pathways, regulation of lipid storage and lipid-mediated gene expression in adipose tissue and macrophages, fatty acid targeting to β-oxidation pathways in muscle, and maintenance of phospholipid membranes in neural tissues. The regulation of these diverse processes is accompanied by the expression of different and sometimes multiple FABPs in these tissues and may be driven by protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions.     

The main fatty acid-binding protein in the liver of the shark (Halaetunus bivius) belongs to the liver basic type. Isolation, amino acid sequence determination and characterization.

Three fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) from the liver of the shark Halaetunus bivius were isolated and characterized: one of them belongs to the liver-type FABP family and the other two to the heart-type FABP family. The complete primary structure of the first FABP, and partial primary structures of the two others, were determined. The liver-type FABP constitutes 69% of the total FABPs, and its amino acid sequence presents the highest identity with chicken, catfish, iguana and elephant fish liver basic FABPs. The L-FABP protein has low affinity for palmitic and oleic acids and high affinity for linoleic and arachidonic acids and other hydrophobic ligands, all of them important for the metabolic functions of the liver. In contrast, both heart-type FABPs have the highest affinity for palmitic acid, the principal fatty acid mobilized from fat deposits for beta-oxidation.     

Liver fatty acid-binding protein and obesity

While low levels of unesterified long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) are normal metabolic intermediates of dietary and endogenous fat, LCFAs are also potent regulators of key receptors/enzymes and at high levels become toxic detergents within the cell. Elevated levels of LCFAs are associated with diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome. Consequently, mammals evolved fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) that bind/sequester these potentially toxic free fatty acids in the cytosol and present them for rapid removal in oxidative (mitochondria, peroxisomes) or storage (endoplasmic reticulum, lipid droplets) organelles. Mammals have a large (15-member) family of FABPs with multiple members occurring within a single cell type. The first described FABP, liver-FABP (L-FABP or FABP1), is expressed in very high levels (2–5% of cytosolic protein) in liver as well as in intestine and kidney. Since L-FABP facilitates uptake and metabolism of LCFAs in vitro and in cultured cells, it was expected that abnormal function or loss of L-FABP would reduce hepatic LCFA uptake/oxidation and thereby increase LCFAs available for oxidation in muscle and/or storage in adipose. This prediction was confirmed in vitro with isolated liver slices and cultured primary hepatocytes from L-FABP gene-ablated mice. Despite unaltered food consumption when fed a control diet ad libitum, the L-FABP null mice exhibited age- and sex-dependent weight gain and increased fat tissue mass. The obese phenotype was exacerbated in L-FABP null mice pair fed a high-fat diet. Taken together with other findings, these data suggest that L-FABP could have an important role in preventing age- or diet-induced obesity.     

Isolation and characterization of two fatty acid binding proteins from intestine of Gallus domesticus

1. Two distinct fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) were isolated and characterized from chicken duodenal mucosa. 2. Molecular weight, functional activity, immunospecificity, mRNA expression, and amino acid composition data for the 14 kDa chicken intestinal FABP was similar, yet not identical, to that of a previously isolated chicken liver FABP. 3. Bound fatty acids were shown to produce isoforms of the 14 kDa intestinal protein but not the larger molecular weight intestinal FABP.     

Structural and biochemical characterization of the lungfish (Lepidosiren paradoxa) liver basic fatty acid binding protein

Only one fatty acid-binding protein (FABP) from the liver of the lungfish (Lepidosiren paradoxa) was isolated and characterized. The sequence comparison of lungfish FABP with that of the known members of the liver FABP (L-FABP) and liver basic FABP (Lb-FABP) subfamilies indicates that it is more closely related to chicken, iguana, frog, axolotl, catfish, and shark Lb-FABPs than to mammalian and axolotl L-FABPs. Lungfish liver expression of this single Lb-FABP contrasts with the other fish studied so far which coexpress an Lb-FABP with heart-adipocyte and/or intestinal FABP types. The lungfish liver FABP expression pattern resembles that of tetrapods, which only expresses liver type FABPs. Lungfish Lb-FABP is one of the two FABPs reported to have a disulfide bridge. The molecular modeling of lungfish Lb-FABP predicts that nine of the conserved residues of Lb-FABPs are oriented toward the binding cavity, thus suggesting they are related to the protein binding characteristics.     

Analyzing the structures, functions and evolution of two abundant gastrointestinal fatty acid binding proteins with recombinant DNA and computational techniques

The structures of intestinal and liver fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) have been determined from an analysis of the nucleotide sequences of cloned cDNAs. The primary translation product of intestinal FABP mRNA contains 132 residues (Mr = 15 124). Liver FABP mRNA encodes a 127 amino acid polypeptide (Mr = 14 273). In vitro co-translational cleavage and translocation assays showed that neither sequence has a cleavable signal peptide or signal peptide equivalent - suggesting that the FABPs do not enter the secretory apparatus but rather are targeted to the cytoplasm. A variety of computational techniques were used to compare the two FABP sequences. The results indicate that liver and intestinal FABP are paralogous homologues. A superfamily of proteins was defined which includes the FABPs, the cellular retinol and retinoic acid binding proteins, the P2 protein of peripheral nerve myelin, and a polypeptide known as 422 whose synthesis is induced during differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells to adipocytes. No sequence homologies were noted between any of these small molecular weight cytosolic proteins and nonspecific lipid transfer protein (sterol carrier protein 2), phosphatidylcholine transfer protein, serum albumin or apolipoprotein AI. The FABPs may have structural features responsible for lipid-protein interactions that are not present in these non-homologous sequences. The distribution of intestinal and liver FABP mRNAs in adult rat tissues and the changes in FABP gene expression which occur during gastrointestinal development support the notion that these proteins are involved in fatty acid uptake, transport and/or compartmentalization. However, differences in tissue distribution and periods of non-coordinate expression during gastrointestinal ontogeny suggest that the two FABPs have distinct functions. The relationship between intestinal and liver FABPs and similar sized cytosolic FABPs isolated from brain, skeletal and cardiac muscle remains unclear. Recombinant DNA techniques combined with comparative sequence analyses offer a useful approach for defining unique as well as general structure-function relationships in this group of fatty acid binding proteins.     

Function and regulation of hepatic and intestinal fatty acid binding proteins

Two structurally different fatty acid binding proteins (FABP) have been isolated from rat liver and small intestinal epithelium. hFABP is a 14 184 Da protein found in abundance in both liver and small intestine, whereas gFABP (15 063 Da) is abundantly present only in small intestine. This review discusses studies which have provided insight into the physiological functions of these proteins. These include analyses of endogenous and exogenous ligand binding to FABP in vitro; examination of the modulating effect of FABP preparations on enzyme activities in vitro; exploration of relationships between alterations in cytosolic FABP content in response to hormonal, pharmacological, and dietary manipulations and changes in the rates of cellular fatty acid uptake and utilization; and studies of hFABP turnover and the mechanisms of FABP regulation. These experiments provide compelling evidence for a broad role of the FABPs in the transport, utilization and cellular economy of free fatty acids in the liver and small intestine, and also in protecting several aspects of cellular function against the modulatory effects of fatty acids, fatty acyl-CoA esters, and other ligands. Studies of FABP regulation also suggest a role in long-term rather than short-term modulation of hepatic fatty acid metabolism and indicate that hFABP and gFABP may perform different functions in the small intestine.