A master sequence related to a free left Alu monomer (FLAM) at the origin of the B1 family in rodent genomes.

The question of the origin of the B1 family of rodents is addressed. The modern B1 elements are similar to the left Alu monomer, but with a 9 bp deletion and a 29 bp duplication. Search of databases for B1 elements that do not exhibit those modern features revealed sequence fragments that are very similar to the free left Alu monomers (FLAMs) described in the primate genomes. In addition, the analysis reveals elements that have 10 bp or 7 bp deletion in place of the 9 bp deletion but without the 29 bp tandem duplication. The elements described define families of proto B1 elements (referred as PB1, PB1D10 and PB1D7) that appeared before the first modern B1 element. A phylogenetic reconstruction suggest that the origin of Alu and B1 families took place before the divergence between the primate and the rodent lineages and that each family has followed different evolutionary routes since this radiation.     

Phylogenetic roots of Alu-mediated rearrangements leading to cancer.

There are over a million Alu repetitive elements dispersed throughout the human genome, and a high level of Alu-sequence similarity ensures a strong propensity for unequal crossover events, some of which have lead to deleterious oncogenic rearrangements. Furthermore, Alu insertions introduce consensus 3' splice sites, which potentially facilitate alternative splicing. Not surprisingly, Alu-mediated defective splicing has also been associated with cancer. To investigate a possible correlation between the expansion of Alu repeats associated with primate divergence and predisposition to cancer, 4 Alu-mediated rearrangements--known to be the basis of cancer--were selected for phylogenetic analysis of the necessary genotype. In these 4 cases, it was determined that the different phylogenetic age of the oncogenic recombination-prone genotype reflected the evolutionary history of Alu repeats spreading to new genomic sites. Our data implies that the evolutionary expansion of Alu repeats to new genomic locations establishes new predispositions to cancer in various primate species.     

Monophyletic Origin of Alu Elements in Primates

To get insight into the early evolution of the primate Alu elements, we characterized sequences of these repeats from the Malagasy prosimians, lemurs (Lemuridae) and sifakas (Indriidae), as well as from galagos (Lorisidae). These sequences were compared with the oldest Alu species known from the human genome: dimeric Alu J and S and free Alu monomers. Our analysis indicates that about 60 Myr ago, before the prosimian divergence, free left and right monomers formed an Alu heterodimer connected by a 19-nucleotide-long A-rich linker. The resulting elements successfully propagated in diverging primate lineages until about ∼20 Myr ago, conserving similar sequence features and essentially the same Alu RNA secondary structure. We suggest that until that time the same ``retropositional niche', molecular machinery making possible the proliferation by retroposition, constrained the evolution of Alu elements in extant primate species. These constraints became subsequently relaxed. In the Malagasy prosimians the dimeric Alu continued to amplify after acquiring a 34- to 36-nucleotide extension of their linker segment, whereas in the galago genome the ``retropositional niche' was occupied by novel short elements. Received: 1 December 1997 / Accepted: 30 January 1998     

Association of some potential hormone response elements in human genes with the Alu family repeats.

Short interspersed repeats of the Alu family located in promoters of some human genes contain high-affinity binding sites for thyroid hormone receptor, retinoic acid receptor and estrogen receptor. The standard binding sites for the receptors represent variants of duplicated AGGTCA motif with different spacing and orientation (direct, DR, or inverted, IR), and Alu sequences were found to have functional DR-4, DR-2 or variant IR-3/IR-17 elements. In this study we analyzed distribution and abundance of the elements in a set of human genomic sequences from GenBank and their association with Alu repeats. Our results indicate that a major fraction of potentially active DR-4, DR-2 and variant IR-3/IR-17 elements in the genes is located within Alu repeats. Alu-associated DR-2 elements are conserved in primate evolution. However, very few Alu have potential DR-3 glucocorticoid-response elements. Gel-shift experiments with the probe (AUB) corresponding to the consensus Alu sequence just upstream of the RNA polymerase III promoter B-box and containing duplicated AGGTCA motif indicate that the probe interacts in a sequence-specific manner with human nuclear proteins which bind to standard IR-0, DR-1, DR-4 or DR-5 elements. The AUB sequence was also able to promote thyroid hormone-dependent trans-activation of a reporter gene. The results support the view that Alu retroposons played an important role in evolution of regulation of the primate gene expression by nuclear hormone receptors.     

Non-traditional Alu evolution and primate genomic diversity

Alu elements belonging to the previously identified "young" subfamilies are thought to have inserted in the human genome after the divergence of humans from non-human primates and therefore should not be present in non-human primate genomes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based screening of over 500 Alu insertion loci resulted in the recovery of a few "young" Alu elements that also resided at orthologous positions in non-human primate genomes. Sequence analysis demonstrated these "young" Alu insertions represented gene conversion events of pre-existing ancient Alu elements or independent parallel insertions of older Alu elements in the same genomic region. The level of gene conversion between Alu elements suggests that it may have a significant influence on the single nucleotide diversity within the genome. All the instances of multiple independent Alu insertions within the same small genomic regions were recovered from the owl monkey genome, indicating a higher Alu amplification rate in owl monkeys relative to many other primates. This study suggests that the majority of Alu insertions in primate genomes are the products of unique evolutionary events.     

The Role of Recombination in the Origin and Evolution of Alu Subfamilies

Alus are the most abundant and successful short interspersed nuclear elements found in primate genomes. In humans, they represent about 10% of the genome, although few are retrotransposition-competent and are clustered into subfamilies according to the source gene from which they evolved. Recombination between them can lead to genomic rearrangements of clinical and evolutionary significance. In this study, we have addressed the role of recombination in the origin of chimeric Alu source genes by the analysis of all known consensus sequences of human Alus. From the allelic diversity of Alu consensus sequences, validated in extant elements resulting from whole genome searches, distinct events of recombination were detected in the origin of particular subfamilies of AluS and AluY source genes. These results demonstrate that at least two subfamilies are likely to have emerged from ectopic Alu-Alu recombination, which stimulates further research regarding the potential of chimeric active Alus to punctuate the genome.     

Evolutionary impact of human Alu repetitive elements

Early studies of human Alu retrotransposons focused on their origin, evolution and biological properties, but current focus is shifting toward the effect of Alu elements on evolution of the human genome. Recent analyses indicate that numerous factors have affected the chromosomal distribution of Alu elements over time, including male-driven insertions, deletions and rapid CpG mutations after their retrotransposition. Unequal crossing over between Alu elements can lead to local mutations or to large segmental duplications responsible for genetic diseases and long-term evolutionary changes. Alu elements can also affect human (primate) evolution by introducing alternative splice sites in existing genes. Studying the Alu family in a human genomic context is likely to have general significance for our understanding of the evolutionary impact of other repetitive elements in diverse eukaryotic genomes.     

Origin and phylogenetic distribution of Alu DNA repeats: irreversible events in the evolution of primates.

Over the past 60 million years, or so, approximately one million copies of Alu DNA repeats have accumulated in the genome of primates, in what appears to be an ongoing process. We determined the phylogenetic distribution of specific Alu (and other) DNA repeats in the genome of several primates: human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, baboon, rhesus, and macaque. At the population level studied, the majority of the repeats was found to be fixed in the primate species. Our data suggest that new Alu elements arise in unique, irreversible events, in a mechanism that seems to preclude precise excision and loss. The same insertions did not arise independently in two species. Once inserted and genetically fixed, the DNA elements are retained in all descendant lineages. The irreversible expansion of Alu s introduces a vector of time into the evolutionary process, and provides realistic (rather than statistical) answers to questions on phylogenies. In contrast to point mutations, the present distribution of individual Alu s is congruent with just one phylogeny. We submit that only irreversible and taxonomically relevant events are at the molecular basis of evolution. Most point mutations do not belong to this category.     

The Biased Distribution of Alus in Human Isochores Might Be Driven by Recombination

Alu retrotransposons do not show a homogeneous distribution over the human genome but have a higher density in GC-rich (H) than in AT-rich (L) isochores. However, since they preferentially insert into the L isochores, the question arises: What is the evolutionary mechanism that shifts the Alu density maximum from L to H isochores? To disclose the role played by each of the potential mechanisms involved in such biased distribution, we carried out a genome-wide analysis of the density of the Alus as a function of their evolutionary age, isochore membership, and intron vs. intergene location. Since Alus depend on the retrotransposase encoded by the LINE1 elements, we also studied the distribution of LINE1 to provide a complete evolutionary scenario. We consecutively check, and discard, the contributions of the Alu/LINE1 competition for retrotransposase, compositional matching pressure, and Alu overrepresentation in introns. In analyzing the role played by unequal recombination, we scan the genome for Alu trimers, a direct product of Alu–Alu recombination. Through computer simulations, we show that such trimers are much more frequent than expected, the observed/expected ratio being higher in L than in H isochores. This result, together with the known higher selective disadvantage of recombination products in H isochores, points to Alu–Alu recombination as the main agent provoking the density shift of Alus toward the GC-rich parts of the genome. Two independent pieces of evidence—the lower evolutionary divergence shown by recently inserted Alu subfamilies and the higher frequency of old stand-alone Alus in L isochores—support such a conclusion. Other evolutionary factors, such as population bottlenecks during primate speciation, may have accelerated the fast accumulation of Alus in GC-rich isochores.