Differential Regulation of Cell Type-specific Apoptosis by Stromelysin-3: A POTENTIAL MECHANISM VIA THE CLEAVAGE OF THE LAMININ RECEPTOR DURING TAIL RESORPTION IN XENOPUS LAEVIS*

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been extensively studied because of their functional attributes in development and diseases. However, relatively few in vivo functional studies have been reported on the roles of MMPs in postembryonic organ development. Amphibian metamorphosis is a unique model for studying MMP function during vertebrate development because of its dependence on thyroid hormone (T3) and the ability to easily manipulate this process with exogenous T3. The MMP stromelysin-3 (ST3) is induced by T3, and its expression correlates with cell death during metamorphosis. We have previously shown that ST3 is both necessary and sufficient for larval epithelial cell death in the remodeling intestine. To investigate the roles of ST3 in other organs and especially on different cell types, we have analyzed the effect of transgenic overexpression of ST3 in the tail of premetamorphic tadpoles. We report for the first time that ST3 expression, in the absence of T3, caused significant muscle cell death in the tail of premetamorphic transgenic tadpoles. On the other hand, only relatively low levels of epidermal cell death were induced by precocious ST3 expression in the tail, contrasting what takes place during natural and T3-induced metamorphosis when ST3 expression is high. This cell type-specific apoptotic response to ST3 in the tail suggests distinct mechanisms regulating cell death in different tissues. Furthermore, our analyses of laminin receptor, an in vivo substrate of ST3 in the intestine, suggest that laminin receptor cleavage may be an underlying mechanism for the cell type-specific effects of ST3.The extracellular matrix (ECM),³ the dynamic milieu of the cell microenvironment, plays a critical role in dictating the fate of the cell. The cross-talk between the cell and ECM and the timely catabolism of the ECM are crucial for tissue remodeling during development (1). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), extrinsic proteolytic regulators of the ECM, mediate this process to a large extent. MMPs are a large family of Zn²⁺-dependent endopeptidases potentially capable of cleaving the extracellular as well as nonextracellular proteins (2–9). The MMP superfamily includes collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, and membrane-type MMPs based on substrate specificity and domain organization (2–4). MMPs have been implicated to influence a wide range of physiological and pathological processes (10–13). The roles of MMPs appear to be very complex. For example, MMPs have been suggested to play roles in both tumor promotion and suppression (13–19). Unfortunately, relatively few functional studies have been carried out in vivo, especially in relation to the mechanisms involved during vertebrate development.Amphibian metamorphosis presents a fascinating experimental model to study MMP function during postembryonic development. A unique and salient feature of the metamorphic process is the absolute dependence on the signaling of thyroid hormone (20–23). This makes it possible to prevent metamorphosis by simply inhibiting the synthesis of endogenous T3 or to induce precocious metamorphosis by merely adding physiological levels of T3 in the rearing water of premetamorphic tadpoles. Gene expression screens have identified the MMP stromelysin-3 (ST3) as a direct T3 response gene (24–27). Expression studies have revealed a distinct spatial and temporal ST3 expression profile in correlation with metamorphic event, especially cell death (25, 28–31). Organ culture studies on intestinal remodeling have directly substantiated an essential role of ST3 in larval epithelial cell death and ECM remodeling (32). Furthermore, precocious expression of ST3 alone in premetamorphic tadpoles through transgenesis is sufficient to induce ECM remodeling and larval epithelial apoptosis in the tadpole intestine (33). Thus, ST3 appears to be necessary and sufficient for intestinal epithelial cell death during metamorphosis.ST3 was first isolated as a breast cancer-associated gene (34), and unlike most other MMPs, ST3 is secreted as an active protease through a furin-dependent intracellular activation mechanism (35). Like many other MMPs, ST3 is expressed in a number of pathological processes, including most human carcinomas (11, 36–40), as well as in many developmental processes in mammals (10, 34, 41–43), although the physiological and pathological roles of ST3 in vivo are largely unknown in mammals. Interestingly, compared with other MMPs, ST3 has only weak activities toward ECM proteins in vitro but stronger activities against non-ECM proteins like α1 proteinase inhibitor and IGFBP-1 (44–46). Although ST3 may cleave ECM proteins strongly in the in vivo environment, these findings suggest that the cleavage of non-ECM proteins is likely important for its biological roles. Consistently, we have recently identified a cell surface receptor, laminin receptor (LR) as an in vivo substrate of ST3 in the tadpole intestine during metamorphosis (47–49). Analyses of LR expression and cleavage suggest that LR cleavage by ST3 is likely an important mechanism by which ST3 regulates the interaction between the larval epithelial cells and the ECM to induce cell death during intestinal remodeling (47, 48).Here, to investigate the role of ST3 in the apoptosis in other tissues during metamorphosis and whether LR cleavage serves as a mechanism for ST3 to regulate the fate of different cell types, we have analyzed the effects of precocious expression of ST3 in premetamorphic tadpole tail. The tail offers an opportunity to examine the effects of ST3 on different cell types. The epidermis, the fast and slow muscles, and the connective tissue underlying the epidermis in the myotendinous junctions and surrounding the notochord constitute the major tissue types in tail (50). Even though death is the destiny of all these cell types, it is not clear whether they all die through similar or different mechanisms. Microscopic and histochemical analyses have shown that at least the muscle and epidermal cells undergo T3-dependent apoptosis during metamorphosis (23, 29, 51, 52). To study whether ST3 regulates apoptosis of these two cell types, we have made use of the transgenic animals that express a transgenic ST3 under the control of a heat shock-inducible promoter (33). We show that whereas extensive apoptosis is present in both the epidermis and muscles during natural as well as T3-induced metamorphosis, transgenic expression of ST3 induces cell death predominantly in the muscles. Furthermore, we show that LR is expressed in the epidermis and connective tissue but not in muscles of the tadpole tail. More importantly, LR cleavage products are present in the tail during natural metamorphosis but not in transgenic tadpoles overexpressing ST3. These results suggest that ST3 has distinct effects on the epidermis and muscles in the tail, possibly because of the tissue-specific expression and function of LR.     

The Interaction of Mitochondrial Iron with Manganese Superoxide Dismutase

Superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) is one of the rare mitochondrial enzymes evolved to use manganese as a cofactor over the more abundant element iron. Although mitochondrial iron does not normally bind SOD2, iron will misincorporate into Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sod2p when cells are starved for manganese or when mitochondrial iron homeostasis is disrupted by mutations in yeast grx5, ssq1, and mtm1. We report here that such changes in mitochondrial manganese and iron similarly affect cofactor selection in a heterologously expressed Escherichia coli Mn-SOD, but not a highly homologous Fe-SOD. By x-ray absorption near edge structure and extended x-ray absorption fine structure analyses of isolated mitochondria, we find that misincorporation of iron into yeast Sod2p does not correlate with significant changes in the average oxidation state or coordination chemistry of bulk mitochondrial iron. Instead, small changes in mitochondrial iron are likely to promote iron-SOD2 interactions. Iron binds Sod2p in yeast mutants blocking late stages of iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis (grx5, ssq1, and atm1), but not in mutants defective in the upstream Isu proteins that serve as scaffolds for iron-sulfur biosynthesis. In fact, we observed a requirement for the Isu proteins in iron inactivation of yeast Sod2p. Sod2p activity was restored in mtm1 and grx5 mutants by depleting cells of Isu proteins or using a dominant negative Isu1p predicted to stabilize iron binding to Isu1p. In all cases where disruptions in iron homeostasis inactivated Sod2p, we observed an increase in mitochondrial Isu proteins. These studies indicate that the Isu proteins and the iron-sulfur pathway can donate iron to Sod2p.Metal-containing enzymes are generally quite specific for their cognate cofactor. Misincorporation of the wrong metal ion can be deleterious and tends to be a rare occurrence in biology. A prime example of metal ion selectivity is illustrated by the family of manganese- and iron-containing superoxide dismutases (SODs)³. This large family of enzymes utilizes either manganese or iron as cofactors to scavenge superoxide anion. The iron- and manganese-containing forms are highly homologous to one another at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels and have virtually identical metal binding and catalytic sites (1–3). Despite this extensive homology, Mn- and Fe-SODs are only active with their cognate metal. Misincorporation of iron into Mn-SOD or vice versa alters the redox potential of the enzyme''s active site and prohibits superoxide disproportionation (4, 5). Nevertheless, misincorporation of iron into Mn-SOD does occur in vivo (6, 7). The isolated Mn-SOD from Escherichia coli is found as a mixture of manganese- and iron-bound forms (7); binding of manganese is favored under oxidative stress, whereas iron binding is increased under anaerobic conditions (3, 8). It has been proposed that changes in bioavailability of manganese versus iron determine the metal selectivity of Mn-SOD in bacterial cells (3, 8). But is this also true for Fe-SOD? Currently, there is no documentation of manganese misincorporation into Fe-SOD in vivo.Unlike bacteria that co-express Mn- and Fe-SOD molecules in the same cell, eukaryotic mitochondria generally harbor only one member of the Fe/Mn-SOD family, a tetrameric Mn-SOD typically known as SOD2 (9). In some organisms, SOD2 is essential for survival (10–12), and mitochondria have therefore evolved to prevent iron-SOD2 interactions despite high levels of mitochondrial iron relative to manganese. Using a yeast model system, we have shown previously that metal ion mis-incorporation can occur with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sod2p (7). Specifically, iron binds and inactivates yeast Sod2p when cells are either starved for manganese or have certain disruptions in mitochondrial iron homeostasis. These disruptions include mutations in MTM1, a mitochondrial carrier protein that functions in iron metabolism (7, 13), and mutations in GRX5 or SSQ1, involved in iron-sulfur biogenesis (14). We proposed that these disruptions lead to expansion of a mitochondrial pool of so-called SOD2-reactive iron (7). Currently, it is unknown whether SOD2-reactive iron represents a major shift in the chemistry of bulk mitochondrial iron or whether it is just a small pool of the metal emerging from one or more specific sites.The grx5 and ssq1 mutants that promote iron-SOD2 interactions encode just two of many components of a complex pathway for iron-sulfur biogenesis (15, 16). One of the key components is a well conserved iron-sulfur scaffold protein originally described for bacteria as IscU, also known as mammalian ISCU and S. cerevisiae Isu1p and Isu2p, referred collectively herein as “Isu proteins” (17–22). The iron-sulfur clusters on Isu proteins are labile and can be transferred to target iron-sulfur proteins through the aid of mitochondrial factors including Grx5p and Ssq1p (15, 16). It is not clear whether disruption of the iron-sulfur pathway per se is sufficient to promote iron interactions with yeast Sod2p or whether this effect is specific to grx5, ssq1, and mtm1 mutants.In the current study, we explore the nature of mitochondrial iron that can interact with Sod2p. We find that the changes in mitochondrial metal homeostasis that shift metal binding in yeast Sod2p likewise alter metal cofactor selection in a heterologously expressed Mn-SOD, but not in a Fe-SOD molecule. Through x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analyses of mitochondrial iron, we detected no major change in bulk mitochondrial iron under conditions that promote iron-SOD2 interactions. SOD2-reactive iron appears to represent a small pool of the metal, and we provide evidence that the iron-sulfur scaffold Isu1p can act as an important source of this reactive iron.     

The Metabolic Status Drives Acclimation of Iron Deficiency Responses in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as Revealed by Proteomics Based Hierarchical Clustering and Reverse Genetics

Iron is a crucial cofactor in numerous redox-active proteins operating in bioenergetic pathways including respiration and photosynthesis. Cellular iron management is essential to sustain sufficient energy production and minimize oxidative stress. To produce energy for cell growth, the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii possesses the metabolic flexibility to use light and/or carbon sources such as acetate. To investigate the interplay between the iron-deficiency response and growth requirements under distinct trophic conditions, we took a quantitative proteomics approach coupled to innovative hierarchical clustering using different “distance-linkage combinations” and random noise injection. Protein co-expression analyses of the combined data sets revealed insights into cellular responses governing acclimation to iron deprivation and regulation associated with photosynthesis dependent growth. Photoautotrophic growth requirements as well as the iron deficiency induced specific metabolic enzymes and stress related proteins, and yet differences in the set of induced enzymes, proteases, and redox-related polypeptides were evident, implying the establishment of distinct response networks under the different conditions. Moreover, our data clearly support the notion that the iron deficiency response includes a hierarchy for iron allocation within organelles in C. reinhardtii. Importantly, deletion of a bifunctional alcohol and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ADH1), which is induced under low iron based on the proteomic data, attenuates the remodeling of the photosynthetic machinery in response to iron deficiency, and at the same time stimulates expression of stress-related proteins such as NDA2, LHCSR3, and PGRL1. This finding provides evidence that the coordinated regulation of bioenergetics pathways and iron deficiency response is sensitive to the cellular and chloroplast metabolic and/or redox status, consistent with systems approach data.The green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has an enormous metabolic versatility (1) and possesses the flexibility to grow in the presence of different carbon sources. It may use carbon dioxide (CO₂) for photoautotrophic, acetate for heterotrophic, and both carbon sources for mixotrophic growth. In this alga CO₂ is fixed via the Calvin Benson Bassham cycle (2), while acetate can be taken up, converted to acetyl-CoA, and enter the glyoxylate cycle where it may be incorporated into C4 acids (3). In addition to the use of acetate as a source of energy and carbon backbone for biosynthetic processes, acetate can control respiration and photosynthesis in conjunction with the light intensity and CO₂ availability (4–6). Moreover, acclimation responses to iron- and copper-deficiencies significantly vary in photoautotrophic versus heterotrophic conditions (7–10), indicating that the metabolic status of the cells influence overall cellular acclimation responses.Transition metals like copper, manganese, and iron possess the ability to donate and accept electrons, making these metals suitable cofactors in enzymes that catalyze redox reactions. In particular, iron is used as a cofactor in numerous biochemical pathways and is therefore an essential nutrient. Cells require relatively high levels of iron because it is present in heme-, iron-sulfur and other proteins that function in respiratory and photosynthetic energy transducing. Correspondingly, in eukaryotic cells, the mitochondrion is a major iron-utilizing compartment. It is well established that iron is transported into mitochondria for heme synthesis and iron-sulfur cluster assembly. This is required for the formation of a functional respiratory electron transport machinery (11). Therefore, mitochondrial metabolism in mammals, fungi and plants is significantly affected under iron deficiency, as demonstrated by a number of studies (12–14). In plants, the chloroplasts are a primary target of iron deficiency. Changes in chloroplast structure, photosynthetic capacity and the composition of thylakoid membranes have been described for plants deprived of iron (15–21).Plants have devised various strategies for acquiring iron (22). Generally, iron deficiency leads to the activation of the iron uptake systems in photosynthetic organisms. For example, the accumulation of the ferroxidase, a component of the high affinity iron uptake system in C. reinhardtii, is very rapidly enhanced when iron becomes limiting (23). Inactivation of IRT1, the most prevalent Fe²⁺ transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana leads to a dramatic iron deficiency that is reflected by chlorosis (24–26). Despite the evolution of elaborate iron-uptake mechanisms in plants, iron deficiency-induced chlorosis remains a major agricultural problem (27, 28).The global impact of iron deficiency on photosynthetic productivity has been also shown in vast ocean regions, which are severely limited for iron (29, 30). Generally, one can conclude that photosynthesis in the oceans and on land can occur in environment where iron availability is restricted.Photosystem I (PSI) is a prime target of iron deficiency as it contains 12 atoms of iron per core complex. In algae, the degradation of PSI is also linked to remodeling of PSI-associated light-harvesting antenna (LHCI) (31–33). Cyanobacteria respond to iron deficiency by degradation of light harvesting phycobilisomes (34) and induction of the “iron-stress-induced” gene isiA. The ISIA protein, which has significant sequence similarity with CP43, a chlorophyll a-binding protein of photosystem II (PSII; (35, 36), forms a ring of 18 molecules around a PSI trimeric reaction center, as shown by electron microscopy (37, 38). The overall reorganization of the PSI complex from 900 kDa into 1.7 MDa complex highlights the large adaptive nature of the cellular response to iron deficiency, which helps to optimize the architecture of the photosynthetic apparatus to conditions in which iron is a limiting factor.The marine diatom Thalassiosira oceanica shows a remarkable retrenchment of cellular metabolism and remodeling of bioenergetic pathways in response to iron availability (39). Low iron triggers a reduction in the level of iron-rich photosynthetic proteins while iron-rich mitochondrial proteins are preserved. Furthermore, iron deprivation causes a remodeling of the photosynthetic machinery resulting in the adjustment of light energy use to an overall decline in the level of photosynthetic electron transport complexes (39). These responses, reported for green algae such as C. reinhardtii (31, 40, 41), are important for minimizing photo-oxidative stress and optimizing photosynthetic function. As observed for T. oceanica, under conditions of low iron availability (in the presence of organic carbon) a hierarchy of iron allocation responses in C. reinhardtii result in the down-regulation of iron-rich photosynthetic complexes while iron-rich mitochondrial complexes remain stable (41). Notably, under photoautotrophic and mixotrophic conditions C. reinhardtii displays distinct iron deprivation responses, suggesting that the cell''s response to iron deficiency is also dependent on trophic conditions (7–9). Thus bioenergetics pathways are remodeled in response to iron availability as well as to the type of carbon source available. Moreover, recent data has indicated that the regulation of iron-induced remodeling of the photosynthetic apparatus is linked to energy metabolism. Depletion of Proton Gradient Regulation Like1 protein (PGRL1) in C. reinhardtii has revealed a decreased efficiency of cyclic electron transfer under low iron conditions resulting in higher vulnerability toward iron deprivation (42).It was our aim to generate a more comprehensive picture of how the proteome of C. reinhardtii varies in response to low iron under distinct trophic conditions and how these changes compare with differences observed for cells grown under photoautotrophic and photoheterotrophic iron replete conditions. Quantitative proteomics in conjunction with a novel hierarchical clustering approach revealed information about the responses of C. reinhardtii to low iron conditions and the iron requirements of photoautotrophic growth. These analyses provide novel insights into the relationships between protein networks required for photosynthesis and iron deprivation-elicited stress responses; these studies are providing the knowledge required for modulating the level of available iron to improve the photosynthetic performance of plants (43, 44).     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Role of Partitioning-defective 1/Microtubule Affinity-regulating Kinases in the Morphogenetic Activity of Helicobacter pylori CagA

Helicobacter pylori CagA plays a key role in gastric carcinogenesis. Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA binds and deregulates SHP-2 phosphatase, a bona fide oncoprotein, thereby causing sustained ERK activation and impaired focal adhesions. CagA also binds and inhibits PAR1b/MARK2, one of the four members of the PAR1 family of kinases, to elicit epithelial polarity defect. In nonpolarized gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces the hummingbird phenotype, an extremely elongated cell shape characterized by a rear retraction defect. This morphological change is dependent on CagA-deregulated SHP-2 and is thus thought to reflect the oncogenic potential of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of the PAR1 family of kinases in the hummingbird phenotype. We found that CagA binds not only PAR1b but also other PAR1 isoforms, with order of strength as follows: PAR1b > PAR1d ≥ PAR1a > PAR1c. Binding of CagA with PAR1 isoforms inhibits the kinase activity. This abolishes the ability of PAR1 to destabilize microtubules and thereby promotes disassembly of focal adhesions, which contributes to the hummingbird phenotype. Consistently, PAR1 knockdown potentiates induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA. The morphogenetic activity of CagA was also found to be augmented through inhibition of non-muscle myosin II. Because myosin II is functionally associated with PAR1, perturbation of PAR1-regulated myosin II by CagA may underlie the defect of rear retraction in the hummingbird phenotype. Our findings reveal that CagA systemically inhibits PAR1 family kinases and indicate that malfunctioning of microtubules and myosin II by CagA-mediated PAR1 inhibition cooperates with deregulated SHP-2 in the morphogenetic activity of CagA.Infection with Helicobacter pylori strains bearing cagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A)-positive strains is the strongest risk factor for the development of gastric carcinoma, the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1–3). The cagA gene is located within a 40-kb DNA fragment, termed the cag pathogenicity island, which is specifically present in the genome of cagA-positive H. pylori strains (4–6). In addition to cagA, there are ∼30 genes in the cag pathogenicity island, many of which encode a bacterial type IV secretion system that delivers the cagA-encoded CagA protein into gastric epithelial cells (7–10). Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA is localized to the plasma membrane, where it undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation at the C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala motifs by Src family kinases or c-Abl kinase (11–14). The C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala-containing region of CagA is noted for the structural diversity among distinct H. pylori isolates. Oncogenic potential of CagA has recently been confirmed by a study showing that systemic expression of CagA in mice induces gastrointestinal and hematological malignancies (15).When expressed in gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces morphological transformation termed the hummingbird phenotype, which is characterized by the development of one or two long and thin protrusions resembling the beak of the hummingbird. It has been thought that the hummingbird phenotype is related to the oncogenic action of CagA (7, 16–19). Pathophysiological relevance for the hummingbird phenotype in gastric carcinogenesis has recently been provided by the observation that infection with H. pylori carrying CagA with greater ability to induce the hummingbird phenotype is more closely associated with gastric carcinoma (20–23). Elevated motility of hummingbird cells (cells showing the hummingbird phenotype) may also contribute to invasion and metastasis of gastric carcinoma.In host cells, CagA interacts with the SHP-2 phosphatase, C-terminal Src kinase, and Crk adaptor in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner (16, 24, 25) and also associates with Grb2 adaptor and c-Met in a phosphorylation-independent manner (26, 27). Among these CagA targets, much attention has been focused on SHP-2 because the phosphatase has been recognized as a bona fide oncoprotein, gain-of-function mutations of which are found in various human malignancies (17, 18, 28). Stable interaction of CagA with SHP-2 requires CagA dimerization, which is mediated by a 16-amino acid CagA-multimerization (CM)² sequence present in the C-terminal region of CagA (29). Upon complex formation, CagA aberrantly activates SHP-2 and thereby elicits sustained ERK MAP kinase activation that promotes mitogenesis (30). Also, CagA-activated SHP-2 dephosphorylates and inhibits focal adhesion kinase (FAK), causing impaired focal adhesions. It has been shown previously that both aberrant ERK activation and FAK inhibition by CagA-deregulated SHP-2 are involved in induction of the hummingbird phenotype (31).Partitioning-defective 1 (PAR1)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (MARK) is an evolutionally conserved serine/threonine kinase originally isolated in C. elegans (32–34). Mammalian cells possess four structurally related PAR1 isoforms, PAR1a/MARK3, PAR1b/MARK2, PAR1c/MARK1, and PAR1d/MARK4 (35–37). Among these, PAR1a, PAR1b, and PAR1c are expressed in a variety of cells, whereas PAR1d is predominantly expressed in neural cells (35, 37). These PAR1 isoforms phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and thereby destabilize microtubules (35, 38), allowing asymmetric distribution of molecules that are involved in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity.In polarized epithelial cells, CagA disrupts the tight junctions and causes loss of apical-basolateral polarity (39, 40). This CagA activity involves the interaction of CagA with PAR1b/MARK2 (19, 41). CagA directly binds to the kinase domain of PAR1b in a tyrosine phosphorylation-independent manner and inhibits the kinase activity. Notably, CagA binds to PAR1b via the CM sequence (19). Because PAR1b is present as a dimer in cells (42), CagA may passively homodimerize upon complex formation with the PAR1 dimer via the CM sequence, and this PAR1-directed CagA dimer would form a stable complex with SHP-2 through its two SH2 domains.Because of the critical role of CagA in gastric carcinogenesis (7, 16–19), it is important to elucidate the molecular basis underlying the morphogenetic activity of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of PAR1 isoforms in induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA, and we obtained evidence that CagA-mediated inhibition of PAR1 kinases contributes to the development of the morphological change by perturbing microtubules and non-muscle myosin II.     

Aberrant Splice Variants of HAS1 (Hyaluronan Synthase 1) Multimerize with and Modulate Normally Spliced HAS1 Protein: A POTENTIAL MECHANISM PROMOTING HUMAN CANCER*

Most human genes undergo alternative splicing, but aberrant splice forms are hallmarks of many cancers, usually resulting from mutations initiating abnormal exon skipping, intron retention, or the introduction of a new splice sites. We have identified a family of aberrant splice variants of HAS1 (the hyaluronan synthase 1 gene) in some B lineage cancers, characterized by exon skipping and/or partial intron retention events that occur either together or independently in different variants, apparently due to accumulation of inherited and acquired mutations. Cellular, biochemical, and oncogenic properties of full-length HAS1 (HAS1-FL) and HAS1 splice variants Va, Vb, and Vc (HAS1-Vs) are compared and characterized. When co-expressed, the properties of HAS1-Vs are dominant over those of HAS1-FL. HAS1-FL appears to be diffusely expressed in the cell, but HAS1-Vs are concentrated in the cytoplasm and/or Golgi apparatus. HAS1-Vs synthesize detectable de novo HA intracellularly. Each of the HAS1-Vs is able to relocalize HAS1-FL protein from diffuse cytoskeleton-anchored locations to deeper cytoplasmic spaces. This HAS1-Vs-mediated relocalization occurs through strong molecular interactions, which also serve to protect HAS1-FL from its otherwise high turnover kinetics. In co-transfected cells, HAS1-FL and HAS1-Vs interact with themselves and with each other to form heteromeric multiprotein assemblies. HAS1-Vc was found to be transforming in vitro and tumorigenic in vivo when introduced as a single oncogene to untransformed cells. The altered distribution and half-life of HAS1-FL, coupled with the characteristics of the HAS1-Vs suggest possible mechanisms whereby the aberrant splicing observed in human cancer may contribute to oncogenesis and disease progression.About 70–80% of human genes undergo alternative splicing, contributing to proteomic diversity and regulatory complexities in normal development (1). About 10% of mutations listed so far in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) of “gene lesions responsible for human inherited disease” were found to be located within splice sites. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly apparent that aberrant splice variants, generated mostly due to splicing defects, play a key role in cancer. Germ line or acquired genomic changes (mutations) in/around splicing elements (2–4) promote aberrant splicing and aberrant protein isoforms.Hyaluronan (HA)³ is synthesized by three different plasma membrane-bound hyaluronan synthases (1, 2, and 3). HAS1 undergoes alternative and aberrant intronic splicing in multiple myeloma, producing truncated variants termed Va, Vb, and Vc (5, 6), which predicted for poor survival in a cohort of multiple myeloma patients (5). Our work suggests that this aberrant splicing arises due to inherited predispositions and acquired mutations in the HAS1 gene (7). Cancer-related, defective mRNA splicing caused by polymorphisms and/or mutations in splicing elements often results in inactivation of tumor suppressor activity (e.g. HRPT2 (8, 9), PTEN (10), MLHI (11–14), and ATR (15)) or generation of dominant negative inhibitors (e.g. CHEK2 (16) and VWOX (17)). In breast cancer, aberrantly spliced forms of progesterone and estrogen receptors are found (reviewed in Ref. 3). Intronic mutations inactivate p53 through aberrant splicing and intron retention (18). Somatic mutations with the potential to alter splicing are frequent in some cancers (19–25). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the cyclin D1 proto-oncogene predispose to aberrant splicing and the cyclin D1b intronic splice variant (26–29). Cyclin D1b confers anchorage independence, is tumorogenic in vivo, and is detectable in human tumors (30), but as yet no clinical studies have confirmed an impact on outcome. On the other hand, aberrant splicing of HAS1 shows an association between aberrant splice variants and malignancy, suggesting that such variants may be potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic indicators (19, 31–33). Increased HA expression has been associated with malignant progression of multiple tumor types, including breast, prostate, colon, glioma, mesothelioma, and multiple myeloma (34). The three mammalian HA synthase (HAS) isoenzymes synthesize HA and are integral transmembrane proteins with a probable porelike structural assembly (35–39). Although in humans, the three HAS genes are located on different chromosomes (hCh19, hCh8, and hCh16, respectively) (40), they share a high degree of sequence homology (41, 42). HAS isoenzymes synthesize a different size range of HA molecules, which exhibit different functions (43, 44). HASs contribute to a variety of cancers (45–55). Overexpression of HASs promotes growth and/or metastatic development in fibrosarcoma, prostate, and mammary carcinoma, and the removal of the HA matrix from a migratory cell membrane inhibits cell movement (45, 53). HAS2 confers anchorage independence (56). Our work has shown aberrant HAS1 splicing in multiple myeloma (5) and Waldenstrom''s macroglobulinemia (6). HAS1 is overexpressed in colon (57), ovarian (58), endometrial (59), mesothelioma (60), and bladder cancers (61). A HAS1 splice variant is detected in bladder cancer (61).Here, we characterize molecular and biochemical characteristics of HAS1 variants (HAS1-Vs) (5), generated by aberrant splicing. Using transient transfectants and tagged HAS1 family constructs, we show that HAS1-Vs differ in cellular localization, de novo HA localization, and turnover kinetics, as compared with HAS1-FL, and dominantly influence HAS1-FL when co-expressed. HAS1-Vs proteins form intra- and intermolecular associations among themselves and with HAS1-FL, including covalent interactions and multimer formation. HAS1-Vc supports vigorous cellular transformation of NIH3T3 cells in vitro, and HAS1-Vc-transformed NIH3T3 cells are tumorogenic in vivo.     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.