Conformational Properties of ��-PrP

Prion propagation involves a conformational transition of the cellular form of prion protein (PrP^C) to a disease-specific isomer (PrP^Sc), shifting from a predominantly α-helical conformation to one dominated by β-sheet structure. This conformational transition is of critical importance in understanding the molecular basis for prion disease. Here, we elucidate the conformational properties of a disulfide-reduced fragment of human PrP spanning residues 91–231 under acidic conditions, using a combination of heteronuclear NMR, analytical ultracentrifugation, and circular dichroism. We find that this form of the protein, which similarly to PrP^Sc, is a potent inhibitor of the 26 S proteasome, assembles into soluble oligomers that have significant β-sheet content. The monomeric precursor to these oligomers exhibits many of the characteristics of a molten globule intermediate with some helical character in regions that form helices I and III in the PrP^C conformation, whereas helix II exhibits little evidence for adopting a helical conformation, suggesting that this region is a likely source of interaction within the initial phases of the transformation to a β-rich conformation. This precursor state is almost as compact as the folded PrP^C structure and, as it assembles, only residues 126–227 are immobilized within the oligomeric structure, leaving the remainder in a mobile, random-coil state.Prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jacob and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker in humans, scrapie in sheep, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle, are fatal neurological disorders associated with the deposition of an abnormally folded form of a host-encoded glycoprotein, prion (PrP)² (1). These diseases may be inherited, arise sporadically, or be acquired through the transmission of an infectious agent (2, 3). The disease-associated form of the protein, termed the scrapie form or PrP^Sc, differs from the normal cellular form (PrP^C) through a conformational change, resulting in a significant increase in the β-sheet content and protease resistance of the protein (3, 4). PrP^C, in contrast, consists of a predominantly α-helical structured domain and an unstructured N-terminal domain, which is capable of binding a number of divalent metals (5–12). A single disulfide bond links two of the main α-helices and forms an integral part of the core of the structured domain (13, 14).According to the protein-only hypothesis (15), the infectious agent is composed of a conformational isomer of PrP (16) that is able to convert other isoforms to the infectious isomer in an autocatalytic manner. Despite numerous studies, little is known about the mechanism of conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc. The most coherent and general model proposed thus far is that PrP^C fluctuates between the dominant native state and minor conformations, one or a set of which can self-associate in an ordered manner to produce a stable supramolecular structure composed of misfolded PrP monomers (3, 17). This stable, oligomeric species can then bind to, and stabilize, rare non-native monomer conformations that are structurally complementary. In this manner, new monomeric chains are recruited and the system can propagate.In view of the above model, considerable effort has been devoted to generating and characterizing alternative, possibly PrP^Sc-like, conformations in the hope of identifying common properties or features that facilitate the formation of amyloid oligomers. This has been accomplished either through PrP^Sc-dependent conversion reactions (18–20) or through conversion of PrP^C in the absence of a PrP^Sc template (21–25). The latter approach, using mainly disulfide-oxidized recombinant PrP, has generated a wide range of novel conformations formed under non-physiological conditions where the native state is relatively destabilized. These conformations have ranged from near-native (14, 26, 27), to those that display significant β-sheet content (21, 23, 28–33). The majority of these latter species have shown a high propensity for aggregation, although not all are on-pathway to the formation of amyloid. Many of these non-native states also display some of the characteristics of PrP^Sc, such as increased β-sheet content, protease resistance, and a propensity for oligomerization (28, 29, 31) and some have been claimed to be associated with the disease process (34).One such PrP folding intermediate, termed β-PrP, differs from the majority of studied PrP intermediate states in that it is formed by refolding the PrP molecule from the native α-helical conformation (here termed α-PrP), at acidic pH in a reduced state, with the disulfide bond broken (22, 35). Although no covalent differences between the PrP^C and PrP^Sc have been consistently identified to date, the role of the disulfide bond in prion propagation remains disputed (25, 36–39). β-PrP is rich in β-sheet structure (22, 35), and displays many of the characteristics of a PrP^Sc-like precursor molecule, such as partial resistance to proteinase K digestion, and the ability to form amyloid fibrils in the presence of physiological concentrations of salts (40).The β-PrP species previously characterized, spanning residues 91–231 of PrP, was soluble at low ionic strength buffers and monomeric, according to elution volume on gel filtration (22). NMR analysis showed that it displayed radically different spectra to those of α-PrP, with considerably fewer observable peaks and markedly reduced chemical shift dispersion. Data from circular dichroism experiments showed that fixed side chain (tertiary) interactions were lost, in contrast to the well defined β-sheet secondary structure, and thus in conjunction with the NMR data, indicated that β-PrP possessed a number of characteristics associated with a “molten globule” folding intermediate (22). Such states have been proposed to be important in amyloid and fibril formation (41). Indeed, antibodies raised against β-PrP (e.g. ICSM33) are capable of recognizing native PrP^Sc (but not PrP^C) (42–44). Subsequently, a related study examining the role of the disulfide bond in PrP folding confirmed that a monomeric molten globule-like form of PrP was formed on refolding the disulfide-reduced protein at acidic pH, but reported that, under their conditions, the circular dichroism response interpreted as β-sheet structure was associated with protein oligomerization (45). Indeed, atomic force microscopy on oligomeric full-length β-PrP (residues 23–231) shows small, round particles, showing that it is capable of formation of oligomers without forming fibrils (35). Notably, however, salt-induced oligomeric β-PrP has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of the 26 S proteasome, in a similar manner to PrP^Sc (46). Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in vivo has been linked to prion neuropathology in prion-infected mice (46).Although the global properties of several PrP intermediate states have been determined (30–32, 35), no information on their conformational properties on a sequence-specific basis has been obtained. Their conformational properties are considered important, as the elucidation of the chain conformation may provide information on the way in which these chains pack in the assembly process, and also potentially provide clues on the mechanism of amyloid assembly and the phenomenon of prion strains. As the conformational fluctuations and heterogeneity of molten globule states give rise to broad NMR spectra that preclude direct observation of their conformational properties by NMR (47–50), here we use denaturant titration experiments to determine the conformational properties of β-PrP, through the population of the unfolded state that is visible by NMR. In addition, we use circular dichroism and analytical ultracentrifugation to examine the global structural properties, and the distribution of multimeric species that are formed from β-PrP.     

The Functional Curli Amyloid Is Not Based on In-register Parallel ��-Sheet Structure

The extracellular curli proteins of Enterobacteriaceae form fibrous structures that are involved in biofilm formation and adhesion to host cells. These curli fibrils are considered a functional amyloid because they are not a consequence of misfolding, but they have many of the properties of protein amyloid. We confirm that fibrils formed by CsgA and CsgB, the primary curli proteins of Escherichia coli, possess many of the hallmarks typical of amyloid. Moreover we demonstrate that curli fibrils possess the cross-β structure that distinguishes protein amyloid. However, solid state NMR experiments indicate that curli structure is not based on an in-register parallel β-sheet architecture, which is common to many human disease-associated amyloids and the yeast prion amyloids. Solid state NMR and electron microscopy data are consistent with a β-helix-like structure but are not sufficient to establish such a structure definitively.Interest in amyloid is largely because of its association with many late onset human diseases, including Alzheimer disease (Aβ),² Parkinson disease (α-synuclein), type II diabetes (amylin), and the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (PrP). In each case a particular endogenous protein becomes incorporated into large aggregates known as amyloid, which was originally defined by pathologists as a tissue deposit staining like starch (1). However, the term amyloid has come to mean a filamentous protein aggregate with cross-β secondary structure (cross-β means that the β-strands that form β-sheets in the amyloid fibrils run approximately perpendicular to the long axis of the fibril with interstrand hydrogen bonds that run approximately parallel to the long axis) and protease resistance. Morphologically amyloid fibrils may vary in length from tens of nanometers to micrometers and have diameters in the range of 3–10 nm, although lateral association can produce much larger apparent diameters.Proteins from a variety of organisms can form amyloid both in vitro and in vivo, and the propensity to form amyloid may be a common property of many proteins (2). In addition to disease-associated amyloids, there are several confirmed cases of functional amyloid (for a review, see Ref. 3). For example, hydrophobins are amyloid-like proteins that coat the surface of fungal cells, and amyloid fibrils coating fish eggs protect them from dehydration (4, 5). The [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina is involved in heterokaryon incompatibility, a recognition of non-self reaction believed to be important as a defense against fungal virus infection (6).Curli are extracellular filamentous structures of Enterobacteriaceae (7) that are integral to biofilm formation and are the major protein component of the extracellular matrix of these organisms (8). Curli of Escherichia coli are composed of the secreted proteins CsgA and CsgB. The latter is believed to prime the polymerization of the former and anchor the fibrils to the outer membrane (9). Both CsgA and CsgB fibrils are β-sheet-rich and, like amyloids, stain with the dye Congo red (10, 11).Because amyloid fibrils are non-crystalline and insoluble, solution NMR and x-ray crystallography are not directly applicable in structural studies. Solid state NMR and electron spin resonance have both been useful in obtaining constraints on amyloid structures and, in some cases, determining detailed structural information. The disease-associated amyloids formed by Aβ, amylin, α-synuclein, and tau along with the infectious amyloids of several yeast prions each have in-register parallel β-sheet structure (12–19).Here we confirm that the fibrils formed in vitro by CsgA and CsgB proteins are amyloids and explore their structure using solid state NMR and electron microscopy. Our results indicate that, unlike the pathogenic amyloids of humans and yeast, CsgA and CsgB amyloids are not in-register parallel β-sheet structures. Solid state NMR and electron microscopy data are consistent with a β-helix-like structure but do not establish such a structure definitively.     

Ligand-specific Conformational Changes in the ��1 Glycine Receptor Ligand-binding Domain

Understanding the activation mechanism of Cys loop ion channel receptors is key to understanding their physiological and pharmacological properties under normal and pathological conditions. The ligand-binding domains of these receptors comprise inner and outer β-sheets and structural studies indicate that channel opening is accompanied by conformational rearrangements in both β-sheets. In an attempt to resolve ligand-dependent movements in the ligand-binding domain, we employed voltage-clamp fluorometry on α1 glycine receptors to compare changes mediated by the agonist, glycine, and by the antagonist, strychnine. Voltage-clamp fluorometry involves labeling introduced cysteines with environmentally sensitive fluorophores and inferring structural rearrangements from ligand-induced fluorescence changes. In the inner β-sheet, we labeled residues in loop 2 and in binding domain loops D and E. At each position, strychnine and glycine induced distinct maximal fluorescence responses. The pre-M1 domain responded similarly; at each of four labeled positions glycine produced a strong fluorescence signal, whereas strychnine did not. This suggests that glycine induces conformational changes in the inner β-sheet and pre-M1 domain that may be important for activation, desensitization, or both. In contrast, most labeled residues in loops C and F yielded fluorescence changes identical in magnitude for glycine and strychnine. A notable exception was H201C in loop C. This labeled residue responded differently to glycine and strychnine, thus underlining the importance of loop C in ligand discrimination. These results provide an important step toward mapping the domains crucial for ligand discrimination in the ligand-binding domain of glycine receptors and possibly other Cys loop receptors.Glycine receptor (GlyR)3 chloride channels are pentameric Cys loop receptors that mediate fast synaptic transmission in the nervous system (1, 2). This family also includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), γ-aminobutyric acid type A and type C receptors, and serotonin type 3 receptors. Individual subunits comprise a large ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a transmembrane domain consisting of four α-helices (M1–M4). The LBD consists of a 10-strand β-sandwich made of an inner β-sheet with six strands and an outer β-sheet with four strands (3). The ligand-binding site is situated at the interface of adjacent subunits and is formed by loops A–C from one subunit and loops D–F from the neighboring subunit (3).The activation mechanism of Cys loop receptors is currently the subject of intense investigation because it is key to understanding receptor function under normal and pathological conditions (4, 5). Based on structural analysis of Torpedo nAChRs, Unwin and colleagues (6, 7) originally proposed that agonist binding induced the inner β-sheet to rotate, whereas the outer β-sheet tilted slightly upwards with loop C clasping around the agonist. These movements were thought to be transmitted to the transmembrane domain via a differential movement of loop 2 (β1-β2) and loop 7 (β6-β7) (both part of the inner β-sheet) and the pre-M1 domain (which is linked via a β-strand to the loop C in the outer sheet). The idea of large loop C movements accompanying agonist binding is supported by structural and functional data (3, 8–13). However, a direct link between loop C movements and channel gating has proved more difficult to establish. Although computational modeling studies have suggested that this loop may be a major component of the channel opening mechanism (14–18), experimental support for this model is not definitive. Similarly, loop F is also thought to move upon ligand binding, although there is as yet no consensus as to whether these changes represent local or global conformational changes (11, 19–21). Recently, a comparison of crystal structures of bacterial Cys loop receptors in the closed and open states revealed that although both the inner and outer β-sheets exhibit different conformations in closed and open states, the pre-M1 domain remains virtually stationary (22, 23). It is therefore relevant to question whether loop C, loop F, and pre-M1 movements are essential for Cys loop receptor activation.Strychnine is a classical competitive antagonist of GlyRs (24, 25), and to date there is no evidence that it can produce LBD structural changes. In this study we use voltage-clamp fluorometry (VCF) to compare glycine- and strychnine-induced conformational changes in the GlyR loops 2, C, D, E, and F and the pre-M1 domain in an attempt to determine whether they signal ligand-binding events, local conformational changes, or conformational changes associated with receptor activation.In a typical VCF experiment, a domain of interest is labeled with an environmentally sensitive fluorophore, and current and fluorescence are monitored simultaneously during ligand application. VCF is ideally suited for identifying ligand-specific conformational changes because it can report on electrophysiologically silent conformational changes (26), such as those induced by antagonists. Indeed, VCF has recently provided valuable insights into the conformational rearrangements of various Cys loop receptors (19, 21, 27–33).     

Amino Acid Position-specific Contributions to Amyloid ��-Protein Oligomerization

Understanding the structural and assembly dynamics of the amyloid β-protein (Aβ) has direct relevance to the development of therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. To elucidate these dynamics, we combined scanning amino acid substitution with a method for quantitative determination of the Aβ oligomer frequency distribution, photo-induced cross-linking of unmodified proteins (PICUP), to perform “scanning PICUP.” Tyr, a reactive group in PICUP, was substituted at position 1, 10, 20, 30, or 40 (for Aβ40) or 42 (for Aβ42). The effects of these substitutions were probed using circular dichroism spectroscopy, thioflavin T binding, electron microscopy, PICUP, and mass spectrometry. All peptides displayed a random coil → α/β → β transition, but substitution-dependent alterations in assembly kinetics and conformer complexity were observed. Tyr¹-substituted homologues of Aβ40 and Aβ42 assembled the slowest and yielded unusual patterns of oligomer bands in gel electrophoresis experiments, suggesting oligomer compaction had occurred. Consistent with this suggestion was the observation of relatively narrow [Tyr¹]Aβ40 fibrils. Substitution of Aβ40 at the C terminus decreased the population conformational complexity and substantially extended the highest order of oligomers observed. This latter effect was observed in both Aβ40 and Aβ42 as the Tyr substitution position number increased. The ability of a single substitution (Tyr¹) to alter Aβ assembly kinetics and the oligomer frequency distribution suggests that the N terminus is not a benign peptide segment, but rather that Aβ conformational dynamics and assembly are affected significantly by the competition between the N and C termini to form a stable complex with the central hydrophobic cluster.Alzheimer disease (AD)⁴ is the most common cause of late-life dementia (1) and is estimated to afflict more than 27 million people worldwide (2). An important etiologic hypothesis is that amyloid β-protein (Aβ) oligomers are the proximate neurotoxins in AD. Substantial in vivo and in vitro evidence supports this hypothesis (3–12). Neurotoxicity studies have shown that Aβ assemblies are potent neurotoxins (5, 13–20), and the toxicity of some oligomers can be greater than that of the corresponding fibrils (21). Soluble Aβ oligomers inhibit hippocampal long term potentiation (4, 5, 13, 15, 17, 18, 22) and disrupt cognitive function (23). Compounds that bind and disrupt the formation of oligomers have been shown to block the neurotoxicity of Aβ (24, 25). Importantly, recent studies in higher vertebrates (dogs) have shown that substantial reduction in amyloid deposits in the absence of decreases in oligomer concentration has little effect on recovery of neurological function (26).Recent studies of Aβ oligomers have sought to correlate oligomer size and biological activity. Oligomers in the supernatants of fibril preparations centrifuged at 100,000 × g caused sustained calcium influx in rat hippocampal neurons, leading to calpain activation and dynamin 1 degradation (27). Aβ-derived diffusible ligand-like Aβ42 oligomers induced inflammatory responses in cultured rat astrocytes (28). A 90-kDa Aβ42 oligomer (29) has been shown to activate ERK1/2 in rat hippocampal slices (30) and bind avidly to human cortical neurons (31), in both cases causing apoptotic cell death. A comparison of the time dependence of the toxic effects of the 90-kDa assembly with that of Aβ-derived diffusible ligands revealed a 5-fold difference, Aβ-derived diffusible ligands requiring more time for equivalent effects (31). A 56-kDa oligomer, “Aβ*56,” was reported to cause memory impairment in middle-aged transgenic mice expressing human amyloid precursor protein (32). A nonamer also had adverse effects. Impaired long term potentiation in rat brain slices has been attributed to Aβ trimers identified in media from cultured cells expressing human amyloid precursor protein (33). Dimers and trimers from this medium also have been found to cause progressive loss of synapses in organotypic rat hippocampal slices (10). In mice deficient in neprilysin, an enzyme that has been shown to degrade Aβ in vivo (34), impairment in neuronal plasticity and cognitive function correlated with significant increases in Aβ dimer levels and synapse-associated Aβ oligomers (35).The potent pathologic effects of Aβ oligomers provide a compelling reason for elucidating the mechanism(s) of their formation. This has been a difficult task because of the metastability and polydispersity of Aβ assemblies (36). To obviate these problems, we introduced the use of the method of photo-induced cross-linking of unmodified proteins (PICUP) to rapidly (<1 s) and covalently stabilize oligomer mixtures (for reviews see Refs. 37, 38). Oligomers thus stabilized no longer exist in equilibrium with monomers or each other, allowing determination of oligomer frequency distributions by simple techniques such as SDS-PAGE (37). Recently, to obtain population-average information on contributions to fibril formation of amino acid residues at specific sites in Aβ, we employed a scanning intrinsic fluorescence approach (39). Tyr was used because it is a relatively small fluorophore, exists natively in Aβ, and possesses the side chain most reactive in the PICUP chemistry (40). Using this approach, we found that the central hydrophobic cluster region (Leu¹⁷–Ala²¹) was particularly important in controlling fibril formation of Aβ40, whereas the C terminus was the predominant structural element controlling Aβ42 assembly (39). Here we present results of studies in which key strategic features of the two methods have been combined to enable execution of “scanning PICUP” and the consequent revelation of site-specific effects on Aβ oligomerization.     

PR55��, a Regulatory Subunit of PP2A, Specifically Regulates PP2A-mediated ��-Catenin Dephosphorylation

A central question in Wnt signaling is the regulation of β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Multiple kinases, including CKIα and GSK3, are involved in β-catenin phosphorylation. Protein phosphatases such as PP2A and PP1 have been implicated in the regulation of β-catenin. However, which phosphatase dephosphorylates β-catenin in vivo and how the specificity of β-catenin dephosphorylation is regulated are not clear. In this study, we show that PP2A regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation in vivo. We demonstrate that PP2A is required for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Drosophila. Moreover, we have identified PR55α as the regulatory subunit of PP2A that controls β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. PR55α, but not the catalytic subunit, PP2Ac, directly interacts with β-catenin. RNA interference knockdown of PR55α elevates β-catenin phosphorylation and decreases Wnt signaling, whereas overexpressing PR55α enhances Wnt signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that PR55α specifically regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation and plays an essential role in Wnt signaling.Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays essential roles in development and tumorigenesis (1–3). Our previous work found that β-catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CKIα⁴ and GSK3 (4), which creates a binding site for β-Trcp (5), leading to degradation via the ubiquitination/proteasome machinery (3). Mutations in β-catenin or APC genes that prevent β-catenin phosphorylation or ubiquitination/degradation lead ultimately to cancer (1, 2).In addition to the involvement of kinases, protein phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, and PP2C, are also implicated in Wnt/β-catenin regulation. PP2C and PP1 may regulate dephosphorylation of Axin and play positive roles in Wnt signaling (6, 7). PP2A is a multisubunit enzyme (8–10); it has been reported to play either positive or negative roles in Wnt signaling likely by targeting different components (11–21). Toward the goal of understanding the mechanism of β-catenin phosphorylation, we carried out siRNA screening targeting several major phosphatases, in which we found that PP2A dephosphorylates β-catenin. This is consistent with a recent study where PP2A is shown to dephosphorylate β-catenin in a cell-free system (18).PP2A consists of a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), a structure subunit (PR65/A), and variable regulatory B subunits (PR/B, PR/B′, PR/B″, or PR/B‴). The substrate specificity of PP2A is thought to be determined by its B subunit (9). By siRNA screening, we further identified that PR55α, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Mechanistically, we found that PR55α directly interacts with β-catenin and regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation in Wnt signaling.     

Insulin Receptor Dysfunction Impairs Cellular Clearance of Neurotoxic Oligomeric A��

Accumulation of amyloid β (Aβ) oligomers in the brain is toxic to synapses and may play an important role in memory loss in Alzheimer disease. However, how these toxins are built up in the brain is not understood. In this study we investigate whether impairments of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors play a role in aggregation of Aβ. Using primary neuronal culture and immortal cell line models, we show that expression of normal insulin or IGF-1 receptors confers cells with abilities to reduce exogenously applied Aβ oligomers (also known as ADDLs) to monomers. In contrast, transfection of malfunctioning human insulin receptor mutants, identified originally from patient with insulin resistance syndrome, or inhibition of insulin and IGF-1 receptors via pharmacological reagents increases ADDL levels by exacerbating their aggregation. In healthy cells, activation of insulin and IGF-1 receptor reduces the extracellular ADDLs applied to cells via seemingly the insulin-degrading enzyme activity. Although insulin triggers ADDL internalization, IGF-1 appears to keep ADDLs on the cell surface. Nevertheless, both insulin and IGF-1 reduce ADDL binding, protect synapses from ADDL synaptotoxic effects, and prevent the ADDL-induced surface insulin receptor loss. Our results suggest that dysfunctions of brain insulin and IGF-1 receptors contribute to Aβ aggregation and subsequent synaptic loss.Abnormal protein misfolding and aggregation are common features in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer (AD),² Parkinson, Huntington, and prion diseases (1–3). In the AD brain, intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated Tau aggregates and extracellular amyloid deposits comprise the two major pathological hallmarks of the disease (1, 4). Aβ aggregation has been shown to initiate from Aβ1–42, a peptide normally cleaved from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) via activities of α- and γ-secretases (5, 6). A large body of evidence in the past decade has indicated that accumulated soluble oligomers of Aβ1–42, likely the earliest or intermediate forms of Aβ deposition, are potently toxic to neurons. The toxic effects of Aβ oligomers include synaptic structural deterioration (7, 8) and functional deficits such as inhibition of synaptic transmission (9) and synaptic plasticity (10–13), as well as memory loss (11, 14, 15). Accumulation of high levels of these oligomers may also trigger inflammatory processes and oxidative stress in the brain probably due to activation of astrocytes and microglia (16, 17). Thus, to understand how a physiologically produced peptide becomes a misfolded toxin has been one of the key issues in uncovering the molecular pathogenesis of the disease.Aβ accumulation and aggregation could derive from overproduction or impaired clearance. Mutations of APP or presenilins 1 and 2, for example, are shown to cause overproduction of Aβ1–42 and amyloid deposits in the brain of early onset AD (18, 19). Because early onset AD accounts for less than 5% of entire AD population, APP and presenilin mutations cannot represent a universal mechanism for accumulation/aggregation of Aβ in the majority of AD cases. With respect to clearance, Aβ is normally removed by both global and local mechanisms, with the former requiring vascular transport across the blood-brain barrier (20, 21) and the latter via local enzymatic digestions by several metalloproteases, including neprilysin, insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), and endothelin converting enzymes 1 and 2 (22–24).The fact that insulin is a common substrate for most of the identified Aβ-degrading enzymes has drawn attention of investigators to roles of insulin signaling in Aβ clearance. Increases in insulin levels frequently seen in insulin resistance may compete for these enzymes and thus contribute to Aβ accumulation. Indeed, insulin signaling has been shown to regulate expression of metalloproteases such as IDE (25, 26), and influence aspects of Aβ metabolism and catabolism (27). In the endothelium of the brain-blood barrier and glial cells, insulin signaling is reported to regulate protein-protein interactions in an uptake cascade involving low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein and its ligands ApoE and α2-macroglobulin, a system known to bind and clear Aβ via endocytosis and/or vascular transport (28, 29). Similarly, circulating IGF-1 has been reported to play a role in Aβ clearance probably via facilitating brain-blood barrier transportation (30, 31).In the brain, insulin signaling plays a role in learning and memory (32–34), potentially linking insulin resistance to AD dementia. Recently we and others have shown that Aβ oligomers interact with neuronal insulin receptors to cause impairments of the receptor expression and function (35–37). These impairments mimic the Aβ oligomer-induced synaptic long term potentiation inhibition and can be overcome by insulin treatment (35, 38). Consistently, impairments of both IR and IGF-1R have been reported in the AD brain (39–41).Based on these results, we ask whether impairment of insulin and IGF-1 signaling contribute to Aβ oligomer build-up in brain cells. To address this question, we set out to test roles of IR and IGF-1R in cellular clearance and transport of Aβ oligomers (ADDLs) applied to primary neuronal cultures and cell lines overexpressing IR and IGF-1R. Our results show that insulin and IGF-1 receptors function to reduce Aβ oligomers to monomers, and prevent Aβ oligomer-induced synaptic toxicity both at the level of synapse composition and structure. By contrast, receptor impairments resulting from “kinase-dead” insulin receptor mutations, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the insulin and IGF-1 receptor, or an inhibitory IGF-1 receptor antibody increase ADDL aggregation in the extracellular medium. Our results provide cellular evidence linking insulin and IGF-1 signaling to amyloidogenesis.     

APH1 Polar Transmembrane Residues Regulate the Assembly and Activity of Presenilin Complexes

Complexes involved in the γ/ϵ-secretase-regulated intramembranous proteolysis of substrates such as the amyloid-β precursor protein are composed primarily of presenilin (PS1 or PS2), nicastrin, anterior pharynx defective-1 (APH1), and PEN2. The presenilin aspartyl residues form the catalytic site, and similar potentially functional polar transmembrane residues in APH1 have been identified. Substitution of charged (E84A, R87A) or polar (Q83A) residues in TM3 had no effect on complex assembly or activity. In contrast, changes to either of two highly conserved histidines (H171A, H197A) located in TM5 and TM6 negatively affected PS1 cleavage and altered binding to other secretase components, resulting in decreased amyloid generating activity. Charge replacement with His-to-Lys substitutions rescued nicastrin maturation and PS1 endoproteolysis leading to assembly of the formation of structurally normal but proteolytically inactive γ-secretase complexes. Substitution with a negatively charged side chain (His-to-Asp) or altering the structural location of the histidines also disrupted γ-secretase binding and abolished functionality of APH1. These results suggest that the conserved transmembrane histidine residues contribute to APH1 function and can affect presenilin catalytic activity.The anterior pharynx defective-1 (APH1)⁵ protein is an essential component of presenilin-dependent complexes required for the γ/ϵ-secretase activity (1). The multicomponent γ-secretase is responsible for the intramembrane proteolysis of a variety of substrates including the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) and Notch receptor. Notch signaling is involved in a variety of important cell fate decisions during embryogenesis and adulthood (2). The γ/ϵ-secretase cleavage of APP protein is related to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease by releasing the 4-kDa amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) which accumulates as senile plaques in patients with Alzheimer disease (3, 4).The γ-complexes are composed of multispanning transmembrane proteins that include APH1 (5, 6), presenilin (PS1 or PS2) (7–10), PEN2 (5), and the type 1 transmembrane nicastrin (NCT) (11). All four components are essential for proteolytic activity, and loss of any single component destabilizes the complex, resulting in the loss of substrate cleavage. Conversely, co-expression of all four components increases γ-secretase activity (12–14). During the maturation of the complexes, presenilins undergo an endoproteolytic cleavage to generate amino- and carboxyl-terminal fragments which remain associated as heterodimers in the active high molecular weight complexes (15–18). Although the exact function of presenilins has been debated (19, 20), it has been proposed that the presenilins are aspartyl proteases with two transmembrane residues constituting the catalytic subunit (21). Analogous aspartyl catalytic dyads are found in the signal peptide peptidases (21, 22). Contributions from the other components are under investigation, and it has been shown, for example, that the large ectodomain of NCT plays a key role in substrate recognition (23, 24). It has also been shown that other proteins can regulate activity such as TMP21, a member of p24 cargo protein, which binds to the presenilin complexes and selectively modulates γ but not ϵ cleavage (25, 26).APH1 is a seven-transmembrane protein with a topology such that the amino terminus is oriented with the endoplasmic reticulum and the carboxyl terminus resides in the cytoplasm (6, 27). It is also expressed as different isoforms encoded by two genes in humans (APH1a on chromosome 1; APH1b on chromosome 15) or three genes in rodents (APH1a on chromosome 3; APH1b and APH1c on chromosome 9). APH1a has 55% sequence similarity with APH1b/APH1c, whereas APH1b and APH1c share 95% similarity. In addition to these different genes, APH1a is alternatively spliced to generate a short (APH1aS) and a long isoform (APH1aL). These two isoforms differ by the addition of 18 residues on the carboxyl-terminal part of APH1aL (28, 29). Deletion of APH1a in mice is embryonically lethal and is associated with developmental and patterning defects similar to those found in Notch, NCT, or PS1 null embryos (30, 31). In contrast to the essential nature of APH1a, the combined APH1b/c-deficient mice survive into adulthood (31). This suggests that APH1a is the major homologue involved in presenilin-dependent function during embryonic development. In addition, these different APH1 variants are constituents of distinct, proteolytically active presenilin-containing complexes and may, therefore, make unique contributions to γ-secretase activity (30–32).Despite their importance to complex formation and function, the exact role of the APH1 isoforms in presenilin-dependent γ/ϵ-secretase activity remains under investigation. In the current study, several highly conserved polar and charged residues located within the transmembrane domains of APH1 were identified. Mutagenesis of two conserved histidine residues embedded in TM5 and TM6 (His-171 and His-197) lead to alterations in γ-secretase complex maturation and activity. The histidine residues contribute to APH1 function and are involved in stabilizing interactions with other γ-secretase components. These key histidines may also be physically localized near the presenilin active site and involved in the γ-secretase activity as shown by the decreased activity of γ-secretase complexes that are assembled with the His-mutants.     

Paradoxical Condensation of Copper with Elevated ��-Amyloid in Lipid Rafts under Cellular Copper Deficiency Conditions: IMPLICATIONS FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE*

Redox-active copper is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD), β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) aggregation, and amyloid formation. Aβ·copper complexes have been identified in AD and catalytically oxidize cholesterol and lipid to generate H₂O₂ and lipid peroxides. The site and mechanism of this abnormality is not known. Growing evidence suggests that amyloidogenic processing of the β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) occurs in lipid rafts, membrane microdomains enriched in cholesterol. β- and γ-secretases, and Aβ have been identified in lipid rafts in cultured cells, human and rodent brains, but the role of copper in lipid raft amyloidogenic processing is presently unknown. In this study, we found that copper modulates flotillin-2 association with cholesterol-rich lipid raft domains, and consequently Aβ synthesis is attenuated via copper-mediated inhibition of APP endocytosis. We also found that total cellular copper is associated inversely with lipid raft copper levels, so that under intracellular copper deficiency conditions, Aβ·copper complexes are more likely to form. This explains the paradoxical hypermetallation of Aβ with copper under tissue copper deficiency conditions in AD.Imbalance of metal ions has been recognized as one of the key factors in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD).² Aberrant interactions between copper or zinc with the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) released into the glutamatergic synaptic cleft vicinity could result in the formation of toxic Aβ oligomers and aggregation into plaques characteristic of AD brains (reviewed in Ref. 1). Copper, iron, and zinc are highly concentrated in extracellular plaques (2, 3), and yet brain tissues from AD (4–6) and human β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice (7–10) are paradoxically copper deficient compared with age-matched controls. Elevation of intracellular copper levels by genetic, dietary, and pharmacological manipulations in both AD transgenic animal and cell culture models is able to attenuate Aβ production (7, 9, 11–15). However, the underlying mechanism is at present unclear.Abnormal cholesterol metabolism is also a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of AD. Hypercholesterolemia increases the risk of developing AD-like pathology in a transgenic mouse model (16). Epidemiological and animal model studies show that a hypercholesterolemic diet is associated with Aβ accumulation and accelerated cognitive decline, both of which are further aggravated by high dietary copper (17, 18). In contrast, biochemical depletion of cholesterol using statins, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, and methyl-β-cyclodextrin, a cholesterol sequestering agent, inhibit Aβ production in animal and cell culture models (19–25).Cholesterol is enriched in lipid rafts, membrane microdomains implicated in Aβ generation from APP cleavage by β- and γ-secretases. Recruitment of BACE1 (β-secretase) into lipid rafts increases the production of sAPP_β and Aβ (23, 26). The β-secretase-cleaved APP C-terminal fragment (β-CTF), and γ-secretase, a multiprotein complex composed of presenilin (PS1 or PS2), nicastrin (Nct), PEN-2 and APH-1, colocalize to lipid rafts (27). The accumulation of Aβ in lipid rafts isolated from AD and APP transgenic mice brains (28) provided further evidence that cholesterol plays a role in APP processing and Aβ generation.Currently, copper and cholesterol have been reported to modulate APP processing independently. However, evidence indicates that, despite tissue copper deficiency, Aβ·Cu²⁺ complexes form in AD that catalytically oxidize cholesterol and lipid to generate H₂O₂ and lipid peroxides (e.g. hydroxynonenal and malondialdehyde), which contribute to oxidative damage observed in AD (29–35). The underlying mechanism leading to the formation of pathological Aβ·Cu²⁺ complexes is unknown. In this study, we show that copper alters the structure of lipid rafts, and attenuates Aβ synthesis in lipid rafts by inhibition of APP endocytosis. We also identify a paradoxical inverse relationship between total cellular copper levels and copper distribution to lipid rafts, which appear to possess a privileged pool of copper where Aβ is more likely to interact with Cu²⁺ under copper-deficiency conditions to form Aβ·Cu²⁺ complexes. These data provide a novel mechanism by which cellular copper deficiency in AD could foster an environment for potentially adverse interactions between Aβ, copper, and cholesterol in lipid rafts.     

Kinetic Analysis of Amyloid Formation in the Presence of Heparan Sulfate: FASTER UNFOLDING AND CHANGE OF PATHWAY*

A number of human diseases are associated with the conversion of proteins from their native state into well defined fibrillar aggregates, depositing in the extracellular space and generally termed amyloid fibrils. Heparan sulfate (HS), a glycosaminoglycan normally present in the extracellular matrix, has been found to be universally associated with amyloid deposits and to promote amyloid fibril formation by all studied protein systems. We have studied the impact of HS on the amyloidogenesis of human muscle acylphosphatase, monitoring the process with an array of techniques, such as normal and stopped-flow far-UV circular dichroism, thioflavin T fluorescence, static and dynamic light scattering, and atomic force microscopy. The results show that HS accelerates the conversion of the studied protein from the native state into the amyloidogenic, yet monomeric, partially folded state. They also indicate that HS does not simply accelerate the conversion of the resulting partially folded state into amyloid species but splits the process into two distinct pathways occurring in parallel: a very fast phase in which HS interacts with a fraction of protein molecules, causing their rapid aggregation into ThT-positive and β-sheet containing oligomers, and a slow phase resulting from the normal aggregation of partially folded molecules that cannot interact with HS. The HS-mediated aggregation pathway is severalfold faster than that observed in the absence of HS. Two aggregation phases are generally observed when proteins aggregate in the presence of HS, underlying the importance of a detailed kinetic analysis to fully understand the effect of this glycosaminoglycan on amyloidogenesis.Deposition of proteins in the form of extracellular amyloid fibrils is a consistent mechanism underlying a group of diverse human diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders and non-neuropathic conditions (1). From a pathogenetic standpoint, these disorders differ by type of aggregated protein and by type of organs involved in amyloid deposition. Among the most prominent neurodegenerative conditions are Alzheimer and Creuzfeldt Jakob diseases, which affect the central nervous system via extracellular deposits. Examples of non-neuropathic systemic amyloidosis are light chain amyloidosis and type II diabetes, where deposits are found in joints, skeletal tissue, and several organs (e.g. heart and kidney). Each of these disorders can be traced back to the aberrant conversion of one specific protein or peptide from its soluble, native state into amyloid structures (1). Numerous biochemical and genetic studies have established a widely accepted causative link between pathological symptoms and amyloid structure formation and deposition (2).Amyloid fibrils are often localized in close proximity to basement membranes, a specialized component of the extracellular matrix that is mainly built of collagens and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs),³ often attached to a protein core to form the proteoglycans (3–5). GAGs are long unbranched polysaccharides that often occur, with the exception of hyaluronic acid existing in a free form, as O- or N-linked side chains of proteoglycans, where they regulate the activity of several proteins. Since they have been found physically associated with all types of amyloid deposits in vivo so far analyzed, they have been attributed fundamental relevance in amyloidogenesis (3, 4). Of the different types of natural GAGs, heparan sulfate (HS) is among the most important cofactors in amyloid deposits. First, it has been established as a universal component of amyloid, since it has been found to be associated with amyloid deposits of different proteins, including the serum amyloid A protein (6), the immunoglobin light chain (7), transthyretin (8), cystatin C (9), the amyloid β peptide (10), the islet amyloid polypeptide (11), and the prion protein (PrP) (12). More importantly, it has been attributed an active role in amyloidogenesis. Its ability to promote fibrillogenesis has been reported for both the 42- and 40-residue forms of the amyloid β peptide (13, 14), mature islet amyloid polypeptide and proislet amyloid polypeptide 1–48 (15), α-synuclein (16), the 173–243 fragment of D187N gelsolin (17), β2-microgloblulin (18), and the tau protein (19). HS has also been found to shift the secondary structure of a subtype of serum amyloid A protein from a random coil to a β-sheet, presumably aggregated, structure (20, 21) and to convert the prion protein from the PrP^C to the PrP^SC form (22).Despite the large body of data supporting the importance of HS in amyloidogenesis, little is known about the precise mechanism by which HS promotes amyloid formation and the effect that this GAG has on the various phases of the aggregation process and on the overall aggregation pathway. In the current work, human muscle acylphosphatase (mAcP) is utilized to study the impact of HS on amyloid aggregation, with particular attention to the various kinetic phases observed in the presence of this GAG. mAcP represents an enzyme unrelated to any human disease but a particularly suitable model for amyloid aggregation studies for a number of reasons. First, it is small in size (98 residues) and lacks disulfide bridges, trans-peptidyl-prolyl bonds, non-proteinaceous cofactors, and other complexities (23, 24). Second, it can form in the presence of 25% (v/v) trifluoroethanol (TFE) amyloid-like fibrils with extensive β-sheet structure and Congo Red birefringence (25). Third, its aggregation process has been studied using a variety of experimental approaches (25–33) and has been shown to be dramatically influenced by heparin, the highly sulfated form of HS (34).In the presence of 25% (v/v) TFE, mAcP has been shown to unfold rapidly into a denatured state enriched with α-helical structure (25). This partially unfolded state assembles to form, on a time scale of 1–2 h, amyloid-like protofibrils that develop very slowly to form, after a period of several days, long amyloid protofilaments that then associate further to form higher order structures (35). Even the early, protofibrillar aggregates that form within 1–2 h have the ability to bind Congo Red and thioflavin T (ThT) and have an extensive β-sheet structure, as detected with far-UV CD and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (25). This indicates that these protofibrillar structures have the essential structural characteristics of amyloid. The unfolding of the native state into a partially unfolded state is required to initiate aggregation, as shown by the need to use denaturing conditions to start aggregation (27, 35), by the finding that mutations destabilizing the native state promote aggregation (26), and by the observation that ligands binding to and stabilizing the native state have the opposite effect (29). Importantly, the TFE-denatured state of mAcP, which is the most commonly used to trigger aggregation of this protein and will also be used here, is not the only aggregation-competent state of mAcP, since other denatured states of mAcP have been shown to be capable of amyloid fibril formation (27).The present study aims at investigating the mechanism through which HS influences mAcP aggregation into amyloid-like aggregates. We will investigate both the unfolding and aggregation phases of mAcP in the presence of HS and will monitor them using a variety of biophysical methods. We will show that HS accelerates unfolding in addition to promoting aggregation of the resulting TFE-denatured state, thus playing a double-faced role in the context of its proaggregating effect. We will also show that HS is responsible for the appearance of parallel phases in the aggregation process of this protein and that its effect is not limited to a simple acceleration of the overall process. Following these findings, we will emphasize that a full understanding of the newly generated kinetics is essential for a correct interpretation of the effects of HS on amyloid formation.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

Single Chain Variable Fragment against Nicastrin Inhibits the ��-Secretase Activity

γ-Secretase is a membrane protein complex that catalyzes intramembrane proteolysis of a variety of substrates including the amyloid β precursor protein of Alzheimer disease. Nicastrin (NCT), a single-pass membrane glycoprotein that harbors a large extracellular domain, is an essential component of the γ-secretase complex. Here we report that overexpression of a single chain variable fragment (scFv) against NCT as an intrabody suppressed the γ-secretase activity. Biochemical analyses revealed that the scFv disrupted the proper folding and the appropriate glycosyl maturation of the endogenous NCT, which are required for the stability of the γ-secretase complex and the intrinsic proteolytic activity, respectively, implicating the dual role of NCT in the γ-secretase complex. Our results also highlight the importance of the calnexin cycle in the functional maturation of the γ-secretase complex. The engineered intrabodies may serve as rationally designed, molecular targeting tools for the discovery of novel actions of the membrane proteins.γ-Secretase catalyzes intramembrane proteolysis of a variety of substrates including amyloid β precursor protein (APP)³ to generate amyloid β peptide (Aβ), the latter being a major component of senile plaques in the brains of Alzheimer disease patients. Thus, agents that inhibit γ-secretase activity could serve as an effective therapeutics for Alzheimer disease, whereas the γ-secretase activity plays important roles in cell signaling pathways including Notch signaling (1, 2). γ-Secretase consists of at least four integral membrane proteins, i.e. presenilin (PS), nicastrin (NCT), APH-1, and PEN-2, all of which are essential to the proteolytic activity (3–5). Molecular cellular and chemical biological analyses have revealed that PS forms a hydrophilic pore involving the transmembrane domain 6 and 7, where conserved catalytic aspartates reside to function as catalytic residues of γ-secretase complex (6, 7). APH-1 is a multipass membrane protein that plays a role in stabilization and trafficking of the γ-secretase complex (8), and PEN-2 is a cofactor for the activation and the regulation of the γ-secretase activity (3, 9).NCT, which was identified as a PS-binding protein (10), is a single-pass membrane protein that harbors an extracellular domain (ECD) with a number of N-glycosylation sites. In mammalian cells NCT undergoes Endo H-resistant complex glycosylation and acquires trypsin resistance during the assembly process of the γ-secretase complex (11–17). Molecular and cellular analyses revealed that the trypsin resistance, presumably indicating the proper structural folding of NCT, might be directly linked to the enzymatic activity, whereas the complex glycosylation is dispensable. Moreover, multiple sequence alignment analyses revealed that NCT ECD have a similarity to an aminopeptidase (18), whereas certain catalytic residues are not conserved. Recently one study has suggested that NCT plays a critical role in substrate recognition (19). During the proteolytic process, NCT ECD captures the most N terminus of the substrate as a primary substrate receptor (i.e. exosite) for the γ-secretase via the aminopeptidase-like domain. However, this view has been recently challenged (20). Nevertheless, as structural information of NCT ECD is totally lacking, the functional role of the structural maturation of NCT in the formation and activity of the γ-secretase remains unclear.Molecular engineering of monoclonal antibodies opens a venue for the functional analyses of targeted molecule and the therapeutic intervention for several diseases (21). A single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) is comprised of heavy- and light-chain sequences of an antibody linked by a short linker and preserves binding abilities of its parental antibody. scFv can be expressed intracellularly as an intrabody (22, 23), which provides a powerful method for phenotypic knock-out of the genes. Intrabodies have been investigated as treatments for a variety of pathological conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson disease and Huntington disease. Moreover, several recent publications have highlighted the therapeutic potential of intrabodies targeting intra- as well as extracellular epitopes (24–29). Here, we generated scFv against NCT from an anti-NCT monoclonal antibody. Unexpectedly, the overexpression of the anti-NCT scFv as an intrabody abolished the proteolytic activity by the destabilization of the γ-secretase complex and the inappropriate glycosylation of NCT. This is the first example showing that engineered antibody would be a useful tool for the direct modulation of the γ-secretase complex and its activity.     

Induced Dimerization of the Amyloid Precursor Protein Leads to Decreased Amyloid-�� Protein Production

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) plays a central role in Alzheimer disease (AD) pathogenesis because sequential cleavages by β- and γ-secretase lead to the generation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, a key constituent in the amyloid plaques present in brains of AD individuals. In several studies APP has recently been shown to form homodimers, and this event appears to influence Aβ generation. However, these studies have relied on APP mutations within the Aβ sequence itself that may affect APP processing by interfering with secretase cleavages independent of dimerization. Therefore, the impact of APP dimerization on Aβ production remains unclear. To address this question, we compared the approach of constitutive cysteine-induced APP dimerization with a regulatable dimerization system that does not require the introduction of mutations within the Aβ sequence. To this end we generated an APP chimeric molecule by fusing a domain of the FK506-binding protein (FKBP) to the C terminus of APP. The addition of the synthetic membrane-permeant drug AP20187 induces rapid dimerization of the APP-FKBP chimera. Using this system we were able to induce up to 70% APP dimers. Our results showed that controlled homodimerization of APP-FKBP leads to a 50% reduction in total Aβ levels in transfected N2a cells. Similar results were obtained with the direct precursor of β-secretase cleavage, C99/SPA4CT-FKBP. Furthermore, there was no modulation of different Aβ peptide species after APP dimerization in this system. Taken together, our results suggest that APP dimerization can directly affect γ-secretase processing and that dimerization is not required for Aβ production.The mechanism of β-amyloid protein (Aβ)² generation from the amyloid precursor protein is of major interest in Alzheimer disease research because Aβ is the major constituent of senile plaques, one of the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer disease (1, 2). In the amyloidogenic pathway Aβ is released from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) (3) after sequential cleavages by β-secretase BACE1 (4–6) and by the γ-secretase complex (7, 8). BACE1 cleavage releases the large ectodomain of APP while generating the membrane-anchored C-terminal APP fragment (CTF) of 99 amino acids (C99). Cleavage of β-CTF by γ-secretase leads to the secretion of Aβ peptides of various lengths and the release of the APP intracellular domain (AICD) into the cytosol (9–11). The γ-secretase complex consists of at least four proteins: presenilin, nicastrin, Aph-I, and Pen-2 (12). Presenilin is thought to be the catalytic subunit of the enzyme complex (13), but how the intramembrane scission is carried out remains to be elucidated. Alternatively, APP can first be cleaved in the non-amyloidogenic pathway by α-secretase within the Aβ domain between Lys-16 and Leu-17 (14, 15). This cleavage releases the APP ectodomain (APPsα) while generating the membrane-bound C-terminal fragment (α-CTF) of 83 amino acids (C83). The latter can be further processed by the γ-secretase complex, resulting in the secretion of the small 3-kDa fragment p3 and the release of AICD.APP, a type I transmembrane protein (16) of unclear function, may act as a cell surface receptor (3). APP and its two homologues, APLP1 and APLP2, can dimerize in a homotypic or heterotypic manner and, in so doing, promote intercellular adhesion (17). In vivo interaction of APP, APLP1, and APLP2 was demonstrated by cross-linking studies from brain homogenates (18). To date at least four domains have been reported to promote APP dimerization; that is, the E1 domain containing the N-terminal growth factor-like domain and copper binding domain (17), the E2 domain containing the carbohydrate domain in the APP ectodomain (19), the APP juxtamembrane region (20), and the transmembrane domain (21, 22). In the latter domain the dimerization appears to be mediated by the GXXXG motif near the luminal face of the transmembrane region (21, 23). In addition to promoting cell adhesion, APP dimerization has been proposed to increase susceptibility to cell death (20, 24).Interestingly, by introducing cysteine mutations into the APP juxtamembrane region, it was shown that stable dimers through formation of these disulfide linkages result in significantly enhanced Aβ production (25). This finding is consistent with the observation that stable Aβ dimers are found intracellularly in neurons and in vivo in brain (26). Taken together, these results have led to the idea that APP dimerization can positively regulate Aβ production. However, other laboratories have not been able to confirm some of these observations using slightly different approaches (23, 27).To further address the question of how dimerization of APP affects cleavage by α-, β-, and γ-secretase, we chose to test this with a controlled dimerization system. Accordingly, we engineered a chimeric APP molecule by fusing a portion of the FK506-binding protein (FKBP) to the C terminus of APP such that the addition of the synthetic membrane-permeant bifunctional compound, AP20187, will induce dimerization of the APP-FKBP chimera in a controlled manner by binding to the FKBP domains. Using this system, efficient dimerization of APP up to 70% can be achieved in a time and concentration-dependent fashion. Our studies showed that controlled homodimerization of APP-FKBP leads to decreased total Aβ levels in transfected N2a cells. Homodimerization of the β-CTF/C99 fragment, the direct precursor of γ-secretase cleavage, showed comparable results. In addition, induced dimerization of APP did not lead to a modulation of different Aβ peptides as it was reported for GXXXG mutants within the transmembrane domain of APP (21).     

��-Defensins in Enteric Innate Immunity: FUNCTIONAL PANETH CELL ��-DEFENSINS IN MOUSE COLONIC LUMEN*

Paneth cells are a secretory epithelial lineage that release dense core granules rich in host defense peptides and proteins from the base of small intestinal crypts. Enteric α-defensins, termed cryptdins (Crps) in mice, are highly abundant in Paneth cell secretions and inherently resistant to proteolysis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that enteric α-defensins of Paneth cell origin persist in a functional state in the mouse large bowel lumen. To test this idea, putative Crps purified from mouse distal colonic lumen were characterized biochemically and assayed in vitro for bactericidal peptide activities. The peptides comigrated with cryptdin control peptides in acid-urea-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, providing identification as putative Crps. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry experiments showed that the molecular masses of the putative α-defensins matched those of the six most abundant known Crps, as well as N-terminally truncated forms of each, and that the peptides contain six Cys residues, consistent with identities as α-defensins. N-terminal sequencing definitively revealed peptides with N termini corresponding to full-length, (des-Leu)-truncated, and (des-Leu-Arg)-truncated N termini of Crps 1–4 and 6. Crps from mouse large bowel lumen were bactericidal in the low micromolar range. Thus, Paneth cell α-defensins secreted into the small intestinal lumen persist as intact and functional forms throughout the intestinal tract, suggesting that the peptides may mediate enteric innate immunity in the colonic lumen, far from their upstream point of secretion in small intestinal crypts.Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)² are released by epithelial cells onto mucosal surfaces as effectors of innate immunity (1–5). In mammals, most AMPs derive from two major families, the cathelicidins and defensins (6). The defensins comprise the α-, β-, and θ-defensin subfamilies, which are defined by the presence of six cysteine residues paired in characteristic tridisulfide arrays (7). α-Defensins are highly abundant in two primary cell lineages: phagocytic leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, of myeloid origin and Paneth cells, which are secretory epithelial cells located at the base of the crypts of Lieberkühn in the small intestine (8–10). Neutrophil α-defensins are stored in azurophilic granules and contribute to non-oxidative microbial cell killing in phagolysosomes (11, 12), except in mice whose neutrophils lack defensins (13). In the small bowel, α-defensins and other host defense proteins (14–18) are released apically as components of Paneth cell secretory granules in response to cholinergic stimulation and after exposure to bacterial antigens (19). Therefore, the release of Paneth cell products into the crypt lumen is inferred to protect mitotically active crypt cells from colonization by potential pathogens and confer protection against enteric infection (7, 20, 21).Under normal, homeostatic conditions, Paneth cells are not found outside the small bowel, although they may appear ectopically in response to local inflammation throughout the gastrointestinal tract (22, 23). Paneth cell numbers increase progressively throughout the small intestine, occurring at highest numbers in the distal ileum (24). Mouse Paneth cells express numerous α-defensin isoforms, termed cryptdins (Crps) (25), that have broad spectrum antimicrobial activities (6, 26). Collectively, α-defensins constitute approximately seventy percent of the bactericidal peptide activity in mouse Paneth cell secretions (19), selectively killing bacteria by membrane-disruptive mechanisms (27–30). The role of Paneth cell α-defensins in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity is evident from studies of mice transgenic for human enteric α-defensin-5, HD-5, which are immune to infection by orally administered Salmonella enterica sv. typhimurium (S. typhimurium) (31).The biosynthesis of mature, bactericidal α-defensins from their inactive precursors requires activation by lineage-specific proteolytic convertases. In mouse Paneth cells, inactive ∼8.4-kDa Crp precursors are processed intracellularly into microbicidal ∼4-kDa Crps by specific cleavage events mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) (32, 33). MMP-7 null mice exhibit increased susceptibility to systemic S. typhimurium infection and decreased clearance of orally administered non-invasive Escherichia coli (19, 32). Although the α-defensin proregions are sensitive to proteolysis, the mature, disulfide-stabilized peptides resist digestion by their converting enzymes in vitro, whether the convertase is MMP-7 (32), trypsin (34), or neutrophil serine proteinases (35). Because α-defensins resist proteolysis in vitro, we hypothesized that Paneth cell α-defensins resist degradation and remain in a functional state in the large bowel, a complex, hostile environment containing varied proteases of both host and microbial origin.Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of a population of enteric α-defensins from the mouse colonic lumen. Full-length and N-terminally truncated Paneth cell α-defensins were identified and are abundant in the distal large bowel lumen.