Analysis of Non-canonical Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1) Interaction Reveals Regulatory and Activating Domains of Neurofascin

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are important for many different mechanisms, including cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Here, we show a new link between FGFR1 and the cell adhesion molecule neurofascin, which is important for neurite outgrowth. After overexpression in HEK293 cells, embryonal neurofascin isoform NF166 was able to associate with FGFR1, whereas the adult isoform NF186, differing from NF166 in additional extracellular sequences, was deficient. Pharmacological inhibitors and overexpression of dominant negative components of the FGFR signaling pathway pointed to the activation of FGFR1 after association with neurofascin in neurite outgrowth assays in chick tectal neurons and rat PC12-E2 cells. Both extra- and intracellular domains of embryonal neurofascin isoform NF166 were able to form complexes with FGFR1 independently. However, the cytosolic domain was both necessary and sufficient for the activation of FGFR1. Cytosolic serine residues 56 and 100 were shown to be essential for the neurite outgrowth-promoting activity of neurofascin, whereas both amino acid residues were dispensable for FGFR1 association. In conclusion, the data suggest a neurofascin intracellular domain, which activates FGFR1 for neurite outgrowth, whereas the extracellular domain functions as an additional, regulatory FGFR1 interaction domain in the course of development.The four known fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs),² which are targeted by a large family of 22 fibroblast growth factor ligands, represent a highly diverse signaling system important for migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival of many different cell types (1, 2). fibroblast growth factor activation of FGFR leads to the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ), depending on the cellular system under study. Non-canonical FGFR interactions with NCAM, cadherins, and syndecan via extracellular domains were also described (1). However, the contribution of intracellular interactions of FGFR1 with further membrane co-receptors is poorly understood. Only cytosolic interaction between FGFRs and EphA4 have been described that are involved in mutual transphosphorylation (3).The cell adhesion molecule neurofascin is important for cell-cell communication in the nervous system (4, 5). Neurofascin regulates many different functions in the brain, suggesting that it functions as a key regulator for both developing and differentiated neural cells. Different alternatively spliced neurofascin isoforms are expressed in different cells and at different times of development (6). Embryonal neurofascin NF166 is important for neurite outgrowth and guidance (7, 8). Recently, a role for neurofascin NF166 for early processes of inhibitory synaptogenesis at the axon hillock and for the positioning of inhibitory synapses at the axon initial segment has been proven (9, 10).In the more developed nervous system, NF166 is replaced by NF186, which is inhibitory for neurite outgrowth (11). NF186 is linked to the cortical actin cytoskeleton via ankyrin_G (12). Clustering of voltage-gated sodium channels both at axon initial segments and at the nodes of Ranvier is conferred by neurofascin NF186 (13, 14). A further cytosolic interaction partner is the PDZ molecule syntenin-1 (15).Despite the well known functional importance of neurofascin in the nervous system, corresponding signaling pathways have not been investigated. In contrast, signaling by the related molecules NCAM and L1 have been studied with regard to the induction of neurite outgrowth in greater detail (for a review, see Refs. 16–18). Both NCAM and L1 induce neurite outgrowth through activation of FGFR1 (19–23). NCAM may further undergo lateral interactions with PrP (prion precursor protein) or GFRα, which is part of the glia-derived neurotrophic factor receptor (24, 25). In addition to FGFR1 interaction, both L1 and NCAM are connected to non-receptor tyrosine kinases. However, whereas NCAM employs the non-receptor kinase c-Fyn as an upstream component, L1 is linked to c-Src (26, 27). L1 converges with NCAM signaling upstream of the MAPK pathway at the level of Raf (18, 21, 28, 29). NCAM may induce alternative signaling pathways, including protein kinase A-dependent signaling or G-proteins (18, 30). NCAM signaling to the nucleus may include activation of CREB and c-Fos or NF-κB (29, 31, 32).Here, we elucidate the molecular mechanisms of neurofascin-FGFR1 interaction for neurite outgrowth. We show that both cytosolic and the extracellular domains are important for the association of FGFR1 with neurofascin. Although the cytosolic domain represents a critical determinant for FGFR1 activation, the extracellular sequences of neurofascin act as a regulator for FGFR1-dependent signal transduction in the course of development.     

Identification of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1 (ERK1) Direct Substrates using Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics

Kinase mediated phosphorylation signaling is extensively involved in cellular functions and human diseases, and unraveling phosphorylation networks requires the identification of substrates targeted by kinases, which has remained challenging. We report here a novel proteomic strategy to identify the specificity and direct substrates of kinases by coupling phosphoproteomics with a sensitive stable isotope labeled kinase reaction. A whole cell extract was moderately dephosphorylated and subjected to in vitro kinase reaction under the condition in which ¹⁸O-ATP is the phosphate donor. The phosphorylated proteins are then isolated and identified by mass spectrometry, in which the heavy phosphate (+85.979 Da) labeled phosphopeptides reveal the kinase specificity. The in vitro phosphorylated proteins with heavy phosphates are further overlapped with in vivo kinase-dependent phosphoproteins for the identification of direct substrates with high confidence. The strategy allowed us to identify 46 phosphorylation sites on 38 direct substrates of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1, including multiple known substrates and novel substrates, highlighting the ability of this high throughput method for direct kinase substrate screening.Protein phosphorylation regulates almost all aspects of cell life, such as cell cycle, migration, and apoptosis (1), and deregulation of protein phosphorylation is one of the most frequent causes or consequences of human diseases including cancers, diabetes, and immune disorders (2). Up till now, however, known substrates are far from saturation for the majority of protein kinases (3); thus, mapping comprehensive kinase-substrate relationships is essential to understanding biological mechanisms and uncovering new drug targets (4).Accompanied with advances of high-speed and high-resolution mass spectrometry, the technique of kinase substrate screening using proteomic strategy is quickly evolving (5–7). Mass spectrometry has been extensively used for kinase-substrate interaction mapping (8) and global phosphorylation profiling (9). Although thousands of phosphorylation sites have been detected, complex phosphorylation cascade and crosstalk between pathways make it difficult for large-scale phosphoproteomics to reveal direct relationships between protein kinases and their substrates (10, 11). Extensive statistics, bioinformatics, and downstream biochemical assays are mandatory for the substrate verification (12, 13). Another strategy uses purified, active kinases to phosphorylate cell extracts in vitro, followed by mass spectrometric analysis to identify phosphoproteins. This approach inevitably faces the major challenge of separating real sites phosphorylated by target kinase and the phosphorylation triggered by endogenous kinases from cell lysates (14). Analog-sensitive kinase allele (15) overcomes the issue by utilizing the engineered kinase that can exclusively take a bulky-ATP analog under the reaction condition. Analog-sensitive kinase allele has been coupled with γ-thiophosphate analog ATP to facilitate the mass spectrometric analysis (16–18).We have introduced kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics (KALIP)¹ to link the in vitro substrate identification and physiological phosphorylation events together in a high throughput manner (19, 20). The strategy, however, has only been applied to identify direct substrates of tyrosine kinases. In this study, we expanded the application of KALIP to serine/threonine kinases by introducing a quantitative strategy termed Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (siKALIP). The method was applied to identify direct substrates of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1), a serine/threonine kinase acting as an essential component of the Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway (21). A defect in the MAP/ERK pathway causes uncontrolled growth, which likely leads to cancer (22) and other diseases (23–25). ERK1 can be activated by growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and nerve growth factor (NGF) (26). Upon stimulation, ERK1 phosphorylates hundreds of substrates in various cellular compartments including cytoplasm, nucleus, and membrane (27). Among 38 ERK1 direct substrates identified by siKALIP, more than one third are previously discovered by classical molecular biology approaches, highlighting high specificity and sensitivity of the strategy. The results also support the hypothesis that ERK1 plays complex roles in multiple pathways that are essential for the cell growth regulation.     

Identification of Direct Tyrosine Kinase Substrates Based on Protein Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics

Protein kinases are implicated in multiple diseases such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and central nervous system disorders. Identification of kinase substrates is critical to dissecting signaling pathways and to understanding disease pathologies. However, methods and techniques used to identify bona fide kinase substrates have remained elusive. Here we describe a proteomic strategy suitable for identifying kinase specificity and direct substrates in high throughput. This approach includes an in vitro kinase assay-based substrate screening and an endogenous kinase dependent phosphorylation profiling. In the in vitro kinase reaction route, a pool of formerly phosphorylated proteins is directly extracted from whole cell extracts, dephosphorylated by phosphatase treatment, after which the kinase of interest is added. Quantitative proteomics identifies the rephosphorylated proteins as direct substrates in vitro. In parallel, the in vivo quantitative phosphoproteomics is performed in which cells are treated with or without the kinase inhibitor. Together, proteins phosphorylated in vitro overlapping with the kinase-dependent phosphoproteome in vivo represents the physiological direct substrates in high confidence. The protein kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics was applied to identify 25 candidate substrates of the protein-tyrosine kinase SYK, including a number of known substrates and many novel substrates in human B cells. These shed light on possible new roles for SYK in multiple important signaling pathways. The results demonstrate that this integrated proteomic approach can provide an efficient strategy to screen direct substrates for protein tyrosine kinases.Protein phosphorylation plays a pivotal role in regulating biological events such as protein–protein interactions, signal transduction, subcellular localization, and apoptosis (1). Deregulation of kinase-substrate interactions often leads to disease states such as human malignancies, diabetes, and immune disorders (2). Although a number of kinases are being targeted to develop new drugs, our understanding of the precise relationships between protein kinases and their direct substrates is incomplete for the majority of protein kinases (3). Thus, mapping kinase–substrate relationships is essential for the understanding of biological signaling networks and the discovery and development of drugs for targeted therapies (4). Toward this goal, various in vitro kinase assays using synthetic peptide libraries (5), phage expression libraries (6), protein arrays (7–9), or cell extracts (10, 11) have been explored for the screening of kinase substrates.Besides classical biochemical and genetic methods, mass spectrometry-based high throughput approaches have become increasingly attractive because they are capable of sequencing proteins and localizing phosphorylation sites at the same time. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic methods have been extensively applied to kinase-substrate interaction mapping (12) and global phosphorylation profiling (13–15). Although thousands of phosphorylation events can be inspected simultaneously (16, 17), large-scale phosphoproteomics does not typically reveal direct relationships between protein kinases and their substrates.Recently, several mass spectrometry-based proteomic strategies have been introduced for identifying elusive kinase substrates (7, 18, 19). Taking advantage of recent advances of high speed and high-resolution mass spectrometry, these methods used purified, active kinases to phosphorylate cell extracts in vitro, followed by mass spectrometric analysis to identify phosphoproteins. These approaches commonly face the major challenge of distinguishing phosphorylation events triggered by the kinase reaction from background signals introduced by endogenous kinase activities (20). To dissect the phosphorylation cascade, Shokat and colleagues developed an approach named Analog-Sensitive Kinase Allele (ASKA)¹ (21). In their approach, a kinase is engineered to accept a bulky-ATP analog exclusively so that direct phosphorylation caused by the analog-sensitive target kinase can be differentiated from that of wild type kinases. As a result, indirect effects caused by contaminating kinases during the in vitro kinase assay are largely eliminated. ASKA has recently been coupled with quantitative proteomics, termed Quantitative Identification of Kinase Substrates (QIKS) (12), to identify substrate proteins of Mek1. Recently, one extension of the ASKA technique is for the analog ATP to carry a γ-thiophosphate group so that in vitro thiophosphorylated proteins can be isolated for mass spectrometric detection (22–24). In addition to ASKA, radioisotope labeling using [γ-³²P]ATP (10), using concentrated purified kinase (25), inactivating endogenous kinase activity by an additional heating step (11), and quantitative proteomics (26, 27) are alternative means aimed to address the same issues. All of these methods, however, have been limited to the identification of in vitro kinase substrates.To bridge the gap between in vitro phosphorylation and physiological phosphorylation events, we have recently introduced an integrated strategy termed Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (KALIP) (28). By combining in vitro kinase assays with in vivo phosphoproteomics, this method was demonstrated to have exceptional sensitivity for high confidence identification of direct kinase substrates. The main drawback for the KALIP approach is that the kinase reaction is performed at the peptide stage to eliminate any problems related to contamination by endogenous kinases. However, the KALIP method may not be effective for kinases that require a priming phosphorylation event (i.e. a previous phosphorylation, on substrate or kinase, has effect on following phosphorylation) (29), additional interacting surfaces (30), or a docking site on the protein (31). For example, basophilic kinases require multiple basic resides for phosphorylation and tryptic digestion will abolish these motifs, which are needed for effective kinase reactions.We address the shortcoming by introducing an alternative strategy termed Protein Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (proKALIP). The major difference between this method and the previous KALIP method is the utilization of protein extracts instead of digested peptides as the substrate pool. The major issue is how to reduce potential interference by endogenous kinase activities. One effective solution is to use a generic kinase inhibitor, 5′-(4-fluorosulfonylbenzoyl)adenosine (FSBA), which was widely used for covalent labeling of kinases (32, 33), kinase isolation (34), kinase activity exploration (35, 36), and more recently kinase substrate identification by Kothary and co-workers (37). However, an extra step is required to effectively remove the inhibitor before the kinase reaction, which may decrease the sensitivity. ProKALIP addresses the issue by carrying out the kinase reaction using formerly in vivo phosphorylated proteins as candidates. This step efficiently improves the sensitivity and specificity of the in vitro kinase reaction. Coupled with in vivo phosphoproteomics, proKALIP has gained a high sensitivity and provided physiologically relevant substrates with high confidence.To demonstrate the proKALIP strategy, the protein-tyrosine kinase SYK was used as our target kinase. SYK is known to play a crucial role in the adaptive immune response, particularly in B cells, by facilitating the antigen induced B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways and modulating cellular responses to oxidative stress in a receptor-independent manner (38, 39). SYK also has diverse biological functions such as innate immune recognition, osteoclast maturation, cellular adhesion, platelet activation, and vascular development (38). In addition, the expression of SYK is highly correlated to tumorigenesis by promoting cell–cell adhesion and inhibiting the motility, growth, and invasiveness of certain cancer cells (40). In this study, we attempt to identify bona fide substrates of SYK in human B cells using the proKALIP approach and demonstrate the specificity and sensitivity of this strategy.     

Sgt1 Dimerization Is Negatively Regulated by Protein Kinase CK2-mediated Phosphorylation at Ser361

The kinetochore, which consists of centromere DNA and structural proteins, is essential for proper chromosome segregation in eukaryotes. In budding yeast, Sgt1 and Hsp90 are required for the binding of Skp1 to Ctf13 (a component of the core kinetochore complex CBF3) and therefore for the assembly of CBF3. We have previously shown that Sgt1 dimerization is important for this kinetochore assembly mechanism. In this study, we report that protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates Ser³⁶¹ on Sgt1, and this phosphorylation inhibits Sgt1 dimerization.The kinetochore is a structural protein complex located in the centromeric region of the chromosome coupled to spindle microtubules (1, 2). The kinetochore generates a signal to arrest cells during mitosis when it is not properly attached to microtubules, thereby preventing chromosome missegregation, which can lead to aneuploidy (3, 4). The molecular structure of the kinetochore complex of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been well characterized; it is composed of more than 70 proteins, many of which are conserved in mammals (2).The centromere DNA in the budding yeast is a 125-bp region that contains three conserved regions, CDEI, CDEII, and CDEIII (5, 6). CDEIII (25 bp) is essential for centromere function (7) and is bound to a key component of the centromere, the CBF3 complex. The CBF3 complex contains four proteins, Ndc10, Cep3, Ctf13 (8–15), and Skp1 (14, 15), all essential for viability. Mutations in any of the CBF3 proteins abolish the ability of CDEIII to bind to CBF3 (16, 17). All of the kinetochore proteins, except the CDEI-binding Cbf1 (18–20), localize to the kinetochores in a CBF3-dependent manner (2). Thus, CBF3 is a fundamental kinetochore complex, and its mechanism of assembly is of great interest.We have previously found that Sgt1 and Skp1 activate Ctf13; thus, they are required for assembly of the CBF3 complex (21). The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is also required to form the active Ctf13-Skp1 complex (22). Sgt1 has two highly conserved motifs that are required for protein-protein interaction: the tetratricopeptide repeat (21) and the CHORD protein and Sgt1-specific motif. We and others have found that both domains are important for the interaction of Sgt1 with Hsp90 (23–26), which is required for assembly of the core kinetochore complex. This interaction is an initial step in kinetochore activation (24, 26, 27), which is conserved between yeast and humans (28, 29).We have recently shown that Sgt1 dimerization is important for Sgt1-Skp1 binding and therefore for kinetochore assembly (30). In this study, we have found that protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates Sgt1 at Ser³⁶¹, and this phosphorylation inhibits Sgt1 dimerization. Therefore, CK2 appears to regulate kinetochore assembly negatively in budding yeast.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Growth Factor Receptor-bound Protein-7 by Focal Adhesion Kinase in the Regulation of Cell Migration, Proliferation, and Tumorigenesis

We have previously reported that growth factor receptor-bound protein-7 (Grb7), an Src-homology 2 (SH2)-containing adaptor protein, enables interaction with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to regulate cell migration in response to integrin activation. To further elucidate the signaling events mediated by FAK·Grb7 complexes in promoting cell migration and other cellular functions, we firstly examined the phos pho ryl a ted tyrosine site(s) of Grb7 by FAK using an in vivo mutagenesis. We found that FAK was capable of phos pho rylating at least 2 of 12 tyrosine residues within Grb7, Tyr-188 and Tyr-338. Moreover, mutations converting the identified Tyr to Phe inhibited integrin-dependent cell migration as well as impaired cell proliferation but not survival compared with the wild-type control. Interestingly, the above inhibitory effects caused by the tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants are probably attributed to their down-regulation of phospho-Tyr-397 of FAK, thereby implying a mechanism by competing with wild-type Grb7 for binding to FAK. Consequently, these tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants evidently altered the phospho-Tyr-118 of paxillin and phos pho ryl a tion of ERK1/2 but less on phospho-Ser-473 of AKT, implying their involvement in the FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions. Additionally, we also illustrated that the formation of FAK·Grb7 complexes and Grb7 phos pho ryl a tion by FAK in an integrin-dependent manner were essential for cell migration, proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in A431 epidermal carcinoma cells, indicating the importance of FAK·Grb7 complexes in tumorigenesis. Our data provide a better understanding on the signal transduction event for FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions as well as to shed light on a potential therapeutic in cancers.Growth factor receptor bound protein-7 (Grb7)² is initially identified as a SH2 domain-containing adaptor protein bound to the activated EGF receptor (1). Grb7 is composed of an N-terminal proline-rich region, following a putative RA (Ras-associating) domain and a central PH (pleckstrin homology) domain and a BPS motif (between PH and SH2 domains), and a C-terminal SH2 domain (2–6). Despite the lack of enzymatic activity, the presence of multiple protein-protein interaction domains allows Grb7 family adaptor proteins to participate in versatile signal transduction pathways and, therefore, to regulate many cellular functions (4–6). A number of signaling molecules has been reported to interact with these featured domains, although most of the identified Grb7 binding partners are mediated through its SH2 domain. For example, the SH2 domain of Grb7 has been demonstrated to be capable of binding to the phospho-tyrosine sites of EGF receptor (1), ErbB2 (7), ErbB3 and ErbB4 (8), Ret (9), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (10), insulin receptor (11), SHPTP2 (12), Tek/Tie2 (13), caveolin (14), c-Kit (15), EphB1 (16), G6f immunoreceptor protein (17), Rnd1 (18), Shc (7), FAK (19), and so on. The proceeding α-helix of the PH domain of Grb7 is the calmodulin-binding domain responsible for recruiting Grb7 to plasma membrane in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner (20), and the association between the PH domain of Grb7 and phosphoinositides is required for the phosphorylation by FAK (21). Two additional proteins, NIK (nuclear factor κB-inducing kinase) and FHL2 (four and half lim domains isoform 2), in association with the GM region (Grb and Mig homology region) of Grb7 are also reported, although the physiological functions for these interactions remain unknown (22, 23). Recently, other novel roles in translational controls and stress responses through the N terminus of Grb7 are implicated for the findings of Grb7 interacting with the 5′-untranslated region of capped targeted KOR (kappa opioid receptor) mRNA and the Hu antigen R of stress granules in an FAK-mediated phosphorylation manner (24, 25).Unlike its member proteins Grb10 and Grb14, the role of Grb7 in cell migration is unambiguous and well documented. This is supported by a series of studies. Firstly, Grb7 family members share a significantly conserved molecular architecture with the Caenorhabditis elegans Mig-10 protein, which is involved in neuronal cell migration during embryonic development (4, 5, 26), suggesting that Grb7 may play a role in cell migration. Moreover, Grb7 is often co-amplified with Her2/ErbB2 in certain human cancers and tumor cell lines (7, 27, 28), and its overexpression resulted in invasive and metastatic consequences of various cancers and tumor cells (23, 29–33). On the contrary, knocking down Grb7 by RNA interference conferred to an inhibitory outcome of the breast cancer motility (34). Furthermore, interaction of Grb7 with autophosphorylated FAK at Tyr-397 could promote integrin-mediated cell migration in NIH 3T3 and CHO cells, whereas overexpression of its SH2 domain, an dominant negative mutant of Grb7, inhibited cell migration (19, 35). Recruitment and phosphorylation of Grb7 by EphB1 receptors enhanced cell migration in an ephrin-dependent manner (16). Recently, G7–18NATE, a selective Grb7-SH2 domain affinity cyclic peptide, was demonstrated to efficiently block cell migration of tumor cells (32, 36). In addition to cell migration, Grb7 has been shown to play a role in a variety of physiological and pathological events, for instance, kidney development (37), tumorigenesis (7, 14, 38–41), angiogenic activity (20), proliferation (34, 42, 43), anti-apoptosis (44), gene expression regulation (24), Silver-Russell syndrome (45), rheumatoid arthritis (46), atopic dermatitis (47), and T-cell activation (17, 48). Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown regarding the downstream signaling events of Grb7-mediated various functions. In particular, given the role of Grb7 as an adaptor molecule and its SH2 domain mainly interacting with upstream regulators, it will be interesting to identify potential downstream effectors through interacting with the functional GM region or N-terminal proline-rich region.In this report, we identified two tyrosine phosphorylated sites of Grb7 by FAK and deciphered the signaling targets downstream through these phosphorylated tyrosine sites to regulate various cellular functions such as cell migration, proliferation, and survival. In addition, our study sheds light on tyrosine phosphorylation of Grb7 by FAK involved in tumorigenesis.     

Use of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Analysis to Elucidate the Mechanisms of Phospho-priming and Auto-activation of the Checkpoint Kinase Rad53 in Vivo

The cell cycle checkpoint kinases play central roles in the genome maintenance of eukaryotes. Activation of the yeast checkpoint kinase Rad53 involves Rad9 or Mrc1 adaptor-mediated phospho-priming by Mec1 kinase, followed by auto-activating phosphorylation within its activation loop. However, the mechanisms by which these adaptors regulate priming phosphorylation of specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remain poorly understood. Here we used quantitative mass spectrometry to delineate the stepwise phosphorylation events in the activation of endogenous Rad53 in response to S phase alkylation DNA damage, and we show that the two Rad9 and Mrc1 adaptors, the four N-terminal Mec1-target TQ sites of Rad53 (Rad53-SCD1), and Rad53-FHA2 coordinate intimately for optimal priming phosphorylation to support substantial Rad53 auto-activation. Rad9 or Mrc1 alone can mediate surprisingly similar Mec1 target site phosphorylation patterns of Rad53, including previously undetected tri- and tetraphosphorylation of Rad53-SCD1. Reducing the number of TQ motifs turns the SCD1 into a proportionally poorer Mec1 target, which then requires the presence of both Mrc1 and Rad9 for sufficient priming and auto-activation. The phosphothreonine-interacting Rad53-FHA domains, particularly FHA2, regulate phospho-priming by interacting with the checkpoint mediators but do not seem to play a major role in the phospho-SCD1-dependent auto-activation step. Finally, mutation of all four SCD1 TQ motifs greatly reduces Rad53 activation but does not eliminate it, and residual Rad53 activity in this mutant is dependent on Rad9 but not Mrc1. Altogether, our results provide a paradigm for how phosphorylation site clusters and checkpoint mediators can be involved in the regulation of signaling relay in protein kinase cascades in vivo and elucidate an SCD1-independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism through the Rad9 pathway. The work also demonstrates the power of mass spectrometry for in-depth analyses of molecular mechanisms in cellular signaling in vivo.Eukaryotic cells are most vulnerable to exogenous DNA-damaging agents during the S phase of the cell cycle, when unprogrammed DNA lesions interfere with the tightly choreographed DNA replication process. DNA damage during this phase leads to the activation of two overlapping checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA replication checkpoint and the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint (1, 2). Phospho-priming for auto-activation of the central checkpoint kinase Rad53 by the upstream kinase Mec1/Tel1 depends on Mrc1 as an adaptor in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway and Rad9 as an adaptor in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway (3–10). Rad53, a well-accepted model system for studying the function and regulation of Chk2-like kinases, contains two forkhead-associated (FHA)¹ domains (FHA1 and -2) and two SQ/TQ cluster domains (SCD1 and -2) enriched in Mec1/Tel1-target phosphorylation sites (11–13).Mrc1 normally is a replisome component that functionally couples DNA Pol ε with Cdc45 and MCM helicase during replication fork progression (14, 15). As the replication forks are stalled by replication stress, the recruited checkpoint sensor kinase Mec1 phosphorylates the SCD of Mrc1, which abolishes its N-terminal interaction with Pol ε and enables Mrc1 to recruit Rad53 and promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 as an initial step in the activation of Rad53 in the Mrc1 branch (6, 14, 16). Alanine substitution of all Mec1 target sites of Mrc1 (designated the mrc1-AQ allele) has been shown to selectively disable its checkpoint function for Rad53 activation without affecting its DNA replication functions (4). In response to DNA damage, Rad9 is able to associate with damaged chromatin via its BRCT and Tudor domains, which tether it to Ser129-phosphorylated histone H2A (γH2A) and Lys79-methylated histone H3, respectively (17, 18). Alternatively, the recruitment of Rad9 onto damaged DNA could also be facilitated by its phosphorylation by CDK1, which enables the specific interaction of Rad9 with Dpb11, allowing the formation of the ternary complex of Dpb11, Mec1, and Rad9 (19, 20). Similar to Mrc1, Mec1 activates the adaptor function of Rad9 by phosphorylation of its SCD, which then binds to the Rad53-FHA domains to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 (3, 5, 10).Beyond serving as scaffolds to recruit Rad53, Mrc1 and Rad9 have been shown to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 in a dose-dependent manner in vitro (3, 16), underlining their adaptor role to enhance the enzyme–substrate (Mec1–Rad53) interaction. However, how they can specifically regulate the priming phosphorylation at specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remains poorly understood. Finally, hyperphosphorylated Rad9 has also been shown to catalyze the auto-phosphorylation of recombinant Rad53 (21), but it remains to be examined whether and how this occurs in vivo.The activation of SCD-FHA containing kinases such as human Chk2 and fission yeast Cds1 has been suggested to involve a two-step phosphorylation process: first, SCD phosphorylation by an ATM/ATR-like kinase leads to intermolecular binding to the FHA domain of another Chk2/Cds1 monomer, which then results in dimerization/oligomerization-dependent auto-phosphorylation within the kinase activation loop (22–26). In addition to the characteristic N-terminal SCD-FHA module of Chk2-like kinases, Rad53 contains another SCD2-FHA2 module C-terminal to its kinase domain. Similar to its orthologues, Rad53 activation has been proposed to depend on SCD1 phosphorylation (but not SCD2 phosphorylation) and partially redundant functions of the two FHA domains (9, 27–29). However, although Rad53-FHA1 can interact with SCD1 in a phospho-threonine (pT)-dependent manner in vitro (9, 28), it appears to be required for Rad53 activation only in G2/M-arrested cells (27, 29). In contrast, the FHA2 domain, which seems to be more important overall for Rad53 activation, does not appreciably bind phospho-SCD1 peptides in vitro (27, 28). Thus, the mechanisms by which Mrc1, Rad9, SCD1 phosphorylation, and FHA domains interact during checkpoint-dependent Rad53 priming and auto-activation remain to be elucidated.Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis has revolutionized the functional analysis of cellular signaling pathways, including site-specific phosphorylation events of key signaling molecules (30–33), but an important caveat is that MS studies often involve protein tags or nonphysiological expression levels that can interfere with normal protein functions. For example, the integration of a triple HA tag into the endogenous RAD53 gene locus has been shown to reduce Rad53 protein levels, resulting in significantly altered checkpoint activity (34). In this study we used quantitative MS analyses to dissect the stepwise phosphorylation events of endogenous, untagged Rad53 in response to MMS-induced alkylation DNA damage and replication stress during the S phase. Together with functional analyses, our results delineate how the two Mec1 adaptors Rad9 and Mrc1 can coordinate with the four SCD1 priming sites (T5, T8, T12, and T15) to regulate the phospho-priming of Rad53 by Mec1. In addition, an SCD1-priming independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism and the specific roles of the FHA domains during Rad53 hyperphosphorylation are also elucidated in this work.