Single Molecule Analysis of a Red Fluorescent RecA Protein Reveals a Defect in Nucleoprotein Filament Nucleation That Relates to Its Reduced Biological Functions

Fluorescent fusion proteins are exceedingly useful for monitoring protein localization in situ or visualizing protein behavior at the single molecule level. Unfortunately, some proteins are rendered inactive by the fusion. To circumvent this problem, we fused a hyperactive RecA protein (RecA803 protein) to monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP1) to produce a functional protein (RecA-RFP) that is suitable for in vivo and in vitro analysis. In vivo, the RecA-RFP partially restores UV resistance, conjugational recombination, and SOS induction to recA⁻ cells. In vitro, the purified RecA-RFP protein forms a nucleoprotein filament whose k_cat for single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity is reduced ∼3-fold relative to wild-type protein, and which is largely inhibited by single-stranded DNA-binding protein. However, RecA protein is also a dATPase; dATP supports RecA-RFP nucleoprotein filament formation in the presence of single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Furthermore, as for the wild-type protein, the activities of RecA-RFP are further enhanced by shifting the pH to 6.2. As a consequence, RecA-RFP is proficient for DNA strand exchange with dATP or at lower pH. Finally, using single molecule visualization, RecA-RFP was seen to assemble into a continuous filament on duplex DNA, and to extend the DNA ∼1.7-fold. Consistent with its attenuated activities, RecA-RFP nucleates onto double-stranded DNA ∼3-fold more slowly than the wild-type protein, but still requires ∼3 monomers to form the rate-limited nucleus needed for filament assembly. Thus, RecA-RFP reveals that its attenuated biological functions correlate with a reduced frequency of nucleoprotein filament nucleation at the single molecule level.The fusion of native proteins to various fluorescent proteins has found widespread use in biology. If the fusion protein retains proper function, then the behavior and localization of the protein can be followed in living cells (1). Complementing the single-cell analysis, it is now possible to image the behavior of a fluorescent protein at the single molecule level (2–8). However, despite the growing popularity of fusion protein studies, a detailed biochemical analysis of the fusion protein is much less common, even though such examination is crucial for molecular interpretations. Thus, an in vivo and in vitro analysis of the function of a fusion protein relative to the wild-type protein is an essential prerequisite.Homologous recombination is an important process not only for generating genetic variation, but also for maintaining genomic integrity through the repair of DNA breaks. In Escherichia coli, recombinational repair of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)³ breaks is mediated by the RecBCD pathway, whereas the repair of ssDNA gaps is mediated by the RecF pathway (9). Both of these recombination pathways require the functions of RecA protein.RecA protein is essential to recombinational DNA repair (9–11). RecA-like proteins are ubiquitous and highly conserved (12, 13). The ATP-bound form of the protein binds to ssDNA and polymerizes along the DNA to form an extended nucleoprotein filament (14–16). This is the functional form of the protein that interacts with dsDNA to search for a homologous sequence. Upon finding homology, RecA protein promotes the exchange of identical DNA strands to produce the heteroduplex joint molecules. The joint molecules can be converted into Holliday junctions and resolved by the RuvABC proteins to produce recombinant DNA products (17).The binding of RecA protein to ssDNA is competitive with the ssDNA binding (SSB) protein (18, 19). The assembly of RecA protein onto ssDNA that is complexed with SSB protein is a kinetically slow process, which is catalyzed by so-called mediator or loading proteins (20). RecBCD enzyme is one such RecA-loading protein (21, 22), but an additional set of loading proteins are the RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins that can form various subassemblies to facilitate the RecA-mediated displacement of SSB from ssDNA (23–26). In addition, a class of mutations that map to recA itself were isolated as suppressors of RecF function (srf) that produced mutant RecA proteins with an enhanced intrinsic ability to displace SSB from ssDNA (27). One such mutant is the RecA803 protein, in which valine 37 is mutated to methionine (28, 29). This mutant RecA protein displays a higher intrinsic rate of nucleoprotein filament assembly on ssDNA, which is responsible for its enhanced capacity to displace DNA-bound SSB protein.RecA protein was successfully fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and was visualized in living bacteria (30). The RecA-GFP protein foci were seen to appear after UV irradiation and to be dependent on the recB and recF gene products. Although this protein is clearly functional in vivo, it was unfortunately, largely insoluble in vitro, thereby limiting large scale purification.⁴ Therefore, to facilitate biochemical use, an alternative fusion protein was constructed. In the present study, the monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP1 (31)) was fused to the carboxyl terminus of the RecA803 protein (referred to as RecA-RFP). The hyperactive RecA803 was used because it assembles on ssDNA more rapidly and competes better with SSB than the wild-type proteins and, as will be shown below, fusion to mRFP1 resulted in attenuated activity; thus, fusion to a hyperactive RecA protein permitted retention of at least partial function. The purified fluorescent protein binds to DNA but shows attenuated ATP and dATP hydrolysis activities. Although nucleoprotein filament assembly is inhibited by SSB protein under typical reaction conditions, we found that nucleoprotein filament formation and enzymatic activities are restored when dATP is substituted for ATP, or when the pH is lowered to 6.2. These characteristics are similar to those of the partially defective RecA142 mutant protein (32, 33), thereby showing that the RFP fusion converted a hypermorphic protein to a hypomorphic RecA fusion protein. Fortunately, because the behavior of this RecA-RFP protein closely fits the biochemical profile of a previously characterized mutant RecA protein, we could understand its behavior. By observing assembly on single molecules of dsDNA, we could see that nucleation of a RecA-RFP filament was ∼3-fold slower than for the wild-type protein. Importantly, these findings lend direct single molecule support to conclusions from ensemble studies where it was shown that biological function of the RecA protein correlates with its ability to displace SSB protein that, in turn, is related to the rate of RecA protein nucleation onto DNA (34).     

Regulation of Rad51 Recombinase Presynaptic Filament Assembly via Interactions with the Rad52 Mediator and the Srs2 Anti-recombinase

Homologous recombination represents an important means for the error-free elimination of DNA double-strand breaks and other deleterious DNA lesions from chromosomes. The Rad51 recombinase, a member of the RAD52 group of recombination proteins, catalyzes the homologous recombination reaction in the context of a helical protein polymer assembled on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that is derived from the nucleolytic processing of a primary lesion. The assembly of the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament, often referred to as the presynaptic filament, is prone to interference by the single-strand DNA-binding factor replication protein A (RPA). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52 protein facilitates presynaptic filament assembly by helping to mediate the displacement of RPA from ssDNA. On the other hand, disruption of the presynaptic filament by the Srs2 helicase leads to a net exchange of Rad51 for RPA. To understand the significance of protein-protein interactions in the control of Rad52- or Srs2-mediated presynaptic filament assembly or disassembly, we have examined two rad51 mutants, rad51 Y388H and rad51 G393D, that are simultaneously ablated for Rad52 and Srs2 interactions and one, rad51 A320V, that is differentially inactivated for Rad52 binding for their biochemical properties and also for functional interactions with Rad52 or Srs2. We show that these mutant rad51 proteins are impervious to the mediator activity of Rad52 or the disruptive function of Srs2 in concordance with their protein interaction defects. Our results thus provide insights into the functional significance of the Rad51-Rad52 and Rad51-Srs2 complexes in the control of presynaptic filament assembly and disassembly. Moreover, our biochemical studies have helped identify A320V as a separation-of-function mutation in Rad51 with regards to a differential ablation of Rad52 interaction.Homologous recombination (HR)³ helps maintain genomic stability by eliminating DNA double-strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation and chemical reagents, by restarting damaged or collapsed DNA replication forks, and by elongating shortened telomeres especially when telomerase is dysfunctional (1–3). Accordingly, defects in HR invariably lead to enhanced sensitivity to genotoxic agents, chromosome aberrations, and tumor development (4, 5). In meiosis also, HR helps mediate the linkage of homologous chromosome pairs via arm cross-overs, thus ensuring the proper segregation of chromosomes at the first meiotic division (6). Accordingly, HR mutants exhibit a plethora of meiotic defects, including early meiotic cell cycle arrest, aneuploidy, and inviability.Much of the knowledge regarding the mechanistic basis of HR has been derived from studies of model organisms, such as the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetic analyses in S. cerevisiae have led to the identification of the RAD52 group of genes, namely, RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, RAD55, RAD57, RAD59, RDH54, MRE11, and XRS2 (1), that are needed for the successful execution of HR. Each member of the RAD52 group of genes has an orthologue in higher eukaryotes, including humans, and mutations in any of these genes cause defects in HR and repair of double-strand breaks.The DNA pairing and strand invasion step of the HR reaction is mediated by RAD51-encoded protein, which is orthologous to the Escherichia coli recombinase RecA (2). Like RecA, Rad51 polymerizes on ssDNA, derived from the nucleolytic processing of a primary lesion such as a double-strand break, to form a right-handed nucleoprotein filament, often referred to as the presynaptic filament (3, 7). The presynaptic filament engages dsDNA, conducts a search for homology in the latter, and catalyzes DNA joint formation between the recombining ssDNA and dsDNA partners upon the location of homology (1, 3). As such, the timely and efficient assembly of the presynaptic filament is indispensable for the successful execution of HR.Because the nucleation of Rad51 onto ssDNA is a rate-limiting process, presynaptic filament assembly is prone to interference by the single-strand DNA-binding protein replication protein A (RPA) (1, 3, 7). In reconstituted biochemical systems, the addition of Rad52 counteracts the inhibitory action of RPA (8, 9). Consistent with the biochemical results, in both mitotic and meiotic cells, the recruitment of Rad51 to double-strand breaks is strongly dependent on Rad52 (10–12). This effect of Rad52 on Rad51 presynaptic filament assembly has been termed a “recombination mediator” function (13).Interestingly, genetic studies have shown that the Srs2 helicase fulfills the role of an anti-recombinase. Specifically, mutations in Srs2 often engender a hyper-recombinational phenotype and can also help suppress the DNA damage sensitivity of rad6 and rad18 mutants, because of the heightened HR proficiency being able to substitute for the post-replicative DNA repair defects of these mutant cells (2, 14). Importantly, in reconstituted systems, Srs2 exerts a strong inhibitory effect on Rad51-mediated reactions in a manner that is potentiated by RPA. Biochemical and electron microscopic analyses have provided compelling evidence that Srs2 acts by disassembling the presynaptic filament, to effect the replacement of Rad51 by RPA (15, 16). The ability of Srs2 to dissociate the presynaptic filament relies on its ATPase activity, revealed using mutant variants, K41A and K41R, that harbor changes in the Walker type A motif involved in ATP engagement. Accordingly, the srs2 K41A and srs2 K41R mutants are biologically inactive (17).In both yeast two-hybrid and biochemical analyses, a complex of Rad51 with either Rad52 or Srs2 can be captured (1, 16). Using yeast two-hybrid-based mutagenesis, several rad51 mutant alleles, A320V, Y388H, and G393D, that engender a defect in the yeast two-hybrid association with Rad52 have been found (18). Here we document our biochemical studies demonstrating the inability of these rad51 mutant proteins to physically and functionally interact with Rad52. Interestingly, we find that two of these rad51 mutants, namely, Y388H and G393D, are also defective in Srs2 interaction. Accordingly, these mutant rad51 proteins form presynaptic filaments that are resistant to the disruptive action of Srs2. Our results thus emphasize the role of Rad51-Rad52 and Rad51-Srs2 interactions in the regulation of Rad51 presynaptic filament assembly and maintenance, and they also reveal the presence of overlapping Rad52 and Srs2 interaction motifs in Rad51. In these regards, our biochemical studies have identified the A320V change as a separation-of-function mutation in Rad51.     

Use of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Analysis to Elucidate the Mechanisms of Phospho-priming and Auto-activation of the Checkpoint Kinase Rad53 in Vivo

The cell cycle checkpoint kinases play central roles in the genome maintenance of eukaryotes. Activation of the yeast checkpoint kinase Rad53 involves Rad9 or Mrc1 adaptor-mediated phospho-priming by Mec1 kinase, followed by auto-activating phosphorylation within its activation loop. However, the mechanisms by which these adaptors regulate priming phosphorylation of specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remain poorly understood. Here we used quantitative mass spectrometry to delineate the stepwise phosphorylation events in the activation of endogenous Rad53 in response to S phase alkylation DNA damage, and we show that the two Rad9 and Mrc1 adaptors, the four N-terminal Mec1-target TQ sites of Rad53 (Rad53-SCD1), and Rad53-FHA2 coordinate intimately for optimal priming phosphorylation to support substantial Rad53 auto-activation. Rad9 or Mrc1 alone can mediate surprisingly similar Mec1 target site phosphorylation patterns of Rad53, including previously undetected tri- and tetraphosphorylation of Rad53-SCD1. Reducing the number of TQ motifs turns the SCD1 into a proportionally poorer Mec1 target, which then requires the presence of both Mrc1 and Rad9 for sufficient priming and auto-activation. The phosphothreonine-interacting Rad53-FHA domains, particularly FHA2, regulate phospho-priming by interacting with the checkpoint mediators but do not seem to play a major role in the phospho-SCD1-dependent auto-activation step. Finally, mutation of all four SCD1 TQ motifs greatly reduces Rad53 activation but does not eliminate it, and residual Rad53 activity in this mutant is dependent on Rad9 but not Mrc1. Altogether, our results provide a paradigm for how phosphorylation site clusters and checkpoint mediators can be involved in the regulation of signaling relay in protein kinase cascades in vivo and elucidate an SCD1-independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism through the Rad9 pathway. The work also demonstrates the power of mass spectrometry for in-depth analyses of molecular mechanisms in cellular signaling in vivo.Eukaryotic cells are most vulnerable to exogenous DNA-damaging agents during the S phase of the cell cycle, when unprogrammed DNA lesions interfere with the tightly choreographed DNA replication process. DNA damage during this phase leads to the activation of two overlapping checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA replication checkpoint and the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint (1, 2). Phospho-priming for auto-activation of the central checkpoint kinase Rad53 by the upstream kinase Mec1/Tel1 depends on Mrc1 as an adaptor in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway and Rad9 as an adaptor in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway (3–10). Rad53, a well-accepted model system for studying the function and regulation of Chk2-like kinases, contains two forkhead-associated (FHA)¹ domains (FHA1 and -2) and two SQ/TQ cluster domains (SCD1 and -2) enriched in Mec1/Tel1-target phosphorylation sites (11–13).Mrc1 normally is a replisome component that functionally couples DNA Pol ε with Cdc45 and MCM helicase during replication fork progression (14, 15). As the replication forks are stalled by replication stress, the recruited checkpoint sensor kinase Mec1 phosphorylates the SCD of Mrc1, which abolishes its N-terminal interaction with Pol ε and enables Mrc1 to recruit Rad53 and promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 as an initial step in the activation of Rad53 in the Mrc1 branch (6, 14, 16). Alanine substitution of all Mec1 target sites of Mrc1 (designated the mrc1-AQ allele) has been shown to selectively disable its checkpoint function for Rad53 activation without affecting its DNA replication functions (4). In response to DNA damage, Rad9 is able to associate with damaged chromatin via its BRCT and Tudor domains, which tether it to Ser129-phosphorylated histone H2A (γH2A) and Lys79-methylated histone H3, respectively (17, 18). Alternatively, the recruitment of Rad9 onto damaged DNA could also be facilitated by its phosphorylation by CDK1, which enables the specific interaction of Rad9 with Dpb11, allowing the formation of the ternary complex of Dpb11, Mec1, and Rad9 (19, 20). Similar to Mrc1, Mec1 activates the adaptor function of Rad9 by phosphorylation of its SCD, which then binds to the Rad53-FHA domains to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 (3, 5, 10).Beyond serving as scaffolds to recruit Rad53, Mrc1 and Rad9 have been shown to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 in a dose-dependent manner in vitro (3, 16), underlining their adaptor role to enhance the enzyme–substrate (Mec1–Rad53) interaction. However, how they can specifically regulate the priming phosphorylation at specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remains poorly understood. Finally, hyperphosphorylated Rad9 has also been shown to catalyze the auto-phosphorylation of recombinant Rad53 (21), but it remains to be examined whether and how this occurs in vivo.The activation of SCD-FHA containing kinases such as human Chk2 and fission yeast Cds1 has been suggested to involve a two-step phosphorylation process: first, SCD phosphorylation by an ATM/ATR-like kinase leads to intermolecular binding to the FHA domain of another Chk2/Cds1 monomer, which then results in dimerization/oligomerization-dependent auto-phosphorylation within the kinase activation loop (22–26). In addition to the characteristic N-terminal SCD-FHA module of Chk2-like kinases, Rad53 contains another SCD2-FHA2 module C-terminal to its kinase domain. Similar to its orthologues, Rad53 activation has been proposed to depend on SCD1 phosphorylation (but not SCD2 phosphorylation) and partially redundant functions of the two FHA domains (9, 27–29). However, although Rad53-FHA1 can interact with SCD1 in a phospho-threonine (pT)-dependent manner in vitro (9, 28), it appears to be required for Rad53 activation only in G2/M-arrested cells (27, 29). In contrast, the FHA2 domain, which seems to be more important overall for Rad53 activation, does not appreciably bind phospho-SCD1 peptides in vitro (27, 28). Thus, the mechanisms by which Mrc1, Rad9, SCD1 phosphorylation, and FHA domains interact during checkpoint-dependent Rad53 priming and auto-activation remain to be elucidated.Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis has revolutionized the functional analysis of cellular signaling pathways, including site-specific phosphorylation events of key signaling molecules (30–33), but an important caveat is that MS studies often involve protein tags or nonphysiological expression levels that can interfere with normal protein functions. For example, the integration of a triple HA tag into the endogenous RAD53 gene locus has been shown to reduce Rad53 protein levels, resulting in significantly altered checkpoint activity (34). In this study we used quantitative MS analyses to dissect the stepwise phosphorylation events of endogenous, untagged Rad53 in response to MMS-induced alkylation DNA damage and replication stress during the S phase. Together with functional analyses, our results delineate how the two Mec1 adaptors Rad9 and Mrc1 can coordinate with the four SCD1 priming sites (T5, T8, T12, and T15) to regulate the phospho-priming of Rad53 by Mec1. In addition, an SCD1-priming independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism and the specific roles of the FHA domains during Rad53 hyperphosphorylation are also elucidated in this work.     

Novel DNA Binding Properties of the Mcm10 Protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The Mcm10 protein is essential for chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. We purified the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mcm10 (ScMcm10) and characterized its DNA binding properties. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and surface plasmon resonance analysis showed that ScMcm10 binds stably to both double strand (ds) DNA and single strand (ss) DNA. On short DNA templates of 25 or 50 bp, surface plasmon resonance analysis showed a ∼1:1 stoichiometry of ScMcm10 to dsDNA. On longer dsDNA templates, however, multiple copies of ScMcm10 cooperated in the rapid assembly of a large, stable nucleoprotein complex. The amount of protein bound was directly proportional to the length of the DNA, with an average occupancy spacing of 21–24 bp. This tight spacing is consistent with a nucleoprotein structure in which ScMcm10 is aligned along the helical axis of the dsDNA. In contrast, the stoichiometry of ScMcm10 bound to ssDNA of 20–50 nucleotides was ∼3:1 suggesting that interaction with ssDNA induces the assembly of a multisubunit ScMcm10 complex composed of at least three subunits. The tight packing of ScMcm10 on dsDNA and the assembly of a multisubunit complex on ssDNA suggests that, in addition to protein-DNA, protein-protein interactions may be involved in forming the nucleoprotein complex. We propose that these DNA binding properties have an important role in (i) initiation of DNA replication and (ii) formation and maintenance of a stable replication fork during the elongation phase of chromosomal DNA replication.MCM10 is a ubiquitous, conserved gene essential for DNA replication in eukaryotes. It was first discovered in yeast genetic screens designed to detect mutants defective in DNA synthesis and minichromosome maintenance (1, 2). In vivo, Mcm10 associates with chromatin and chromosomal replication origins in human cells (hMcm10), Xenopus laevis (XMcm10), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (SpMcm10), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScMcm10) (3–6). In S. cerevisiae, initiation of chromosomal replication occurs at multiple specific sites known as autonomously replicating sequences (ARSs)² (7). Mutations in MCM10 enhance the loss rate of plasmids bearing specific ARSs (8), suggesting a function for ScMcm10 in initiation.In eukaryotic systems replication initiation is a cell cycle-regulated process characterized by a multistep sequential loading of ORC, Cdc6, Cdt1, and the Mcm2–7 complex onto the origin in G₁ to form the pre-RC complex. Binding of ORC, Cdc6p, and Cdt1p to chromatin is a prerequisite for the recruitment of Mcm2–7 (9, 10). The next step in the assembly of the initiation replication apparatus in S. cerevisiae involves protein kinases (Cdc28 and Cdc7/Dbf4), and recruitment of Mcm10, Cdc45, and the GINS complex. The mechanism for targeting Mcm10 to replications origins is unknown. However, recent studies in S. cerevisiae have shown that Mcm10 and Mcm2–7 physically interact (6, 11). It is now believed that in late G₁, chromatin-bound Mcm2–7 is responsible for the recruitment of Mcm10 presumably via protein-protein interactions (12). Prior studies in the Xenopus laevis system reached similar conclusions (4). Additional interactions of Mcm10 with other components of the pre-RC cannot be excluded (13).A key step in the initiation of replication is the local melting of an origin DNA sequence, which occurs at the G₁/S transition and throughout the S phase. The mechanism of this essential DNA-melting process is not understood. There is no evidence in S. cerevisiae that the assembled pre-RC complex leads to the melting of an origin DNA sequence. This unwinding may occur only following the recruitment of Mcm10, raising the possibility that Mcm10 is a key component of the initiation machinery responsible for this process. Results of a study in the Xenopus egg extract system (4), which showed that omission of XMcm10 blocks unwinding of plasmid DNA and initiation of DNA replication, are consistent with this notion. An additional function of Mcm10 in initiation is in the recruitment of Cdc45 to replication origins, presumably via Mcm10-Cdc45 physical interactions (5, 14). Cdc45 is believed to be important for the activation of replication origins and the assembly of the replication elongation complex (15). Upon initiation of DNA replication, ScMcm10 moves from the origin to origin-proximal sequences suggesting that ScMcm10 associates with moving replication forks (12) and is consistent with the observation that elevated temperatures cause pausing of replication forks in a mcm10-1 ts mutant (8). Both ScMcm10 and SpMcm10 interact with DNA polymerase α supporting the notion that replication fork movement requires Mcm10. ScMcm10 and polymerase α form a complex on and off the DNA in vivo (12). In S. pombe, SpMcm10 stimulates the activity of polymerase α in vitro and associates with a primase activity (16, 17) that has not been reported in other eukaryotes (18).Previous studies with Mcm10 in other systems showed that Mcm10 binds DNA. Using a filter binding assay Fien and Hurwitz (16) reported that SpMcm10 from S. pombe binds well to ssDNA but barely interacts (20-fold lower affinity) with dsDNA. It has been suggested that binding of SpMcm10 to ssDNA is important for the recruitment of polymerase α (16). Recently, it has been reported that a DNA binding activity is also associated with XMcm10 protein from X. laevis. Measurements of fluorescence anisotropy were used to show binding of XMcm10 to short, 25-nucleotide-long oligonucleotides (18). These studies have shown that XMcm10 has similar affinities for ssDNA and dsDNA. Unlike SpMcm10, which harbors a single DNA-binding domain in the N-terminal half of the protein, XMcm10 seems to contain two distinct domains for binding DNA. The biological implication of having two DNA-binding domains is not clear.It appears that there are differences in the quaternary structure of Mcm10 from different organisms. Although SpMcm10 and XMcm10 may be a homodimer in solution (17, 18), a recent electron microscopy study suggested that human hMcm10 has a hexameric ring structure (19). The same study reported that hMcm10 interacts with ssDNA but failed to bind dsDNA. The differences in structure and DNA binding properties may reflect differences in the function of Mcm10 in various organisms as well as in the protein preparations.Here we report, for the first time, the characterization of the DNA binding properties of purified Mcm10 from S. cerevisiae. We show that ScMcm10 forms a stable complex with dsDNA and ssDNA. In addition, we demonstrate that dsDNA longer than 50 bp sustains oligomerization of ScMcm10. The number of ScMcm10 molecules bound is directly proportional to the size of the dsDNA, suggesting that ScMcm10 is tightly packed on the dsDNA, perhaps in a head to tail oligomeric structure. In contrast to a 25-bp-long dsDNA, which supports the binding of a single copy of ScMcm10, ssDNA containing only 20 nucleotides may sustain binding of as many as three copies of ScMcm10, suggesting that a ScMcm10 complex composed of at least 3 subunits assembles on ssDNA. We believe that these distinct binding properties to dsDNA and ssDNA are important for the ScMcm10 functions in initiation, formation of replication forks, and the maintenance of replication fork progression during chromosomal DNA replication.     

Functions of Manduca sexta Hemolymph Proteinases HP6 and HP8 in Two Innate Immune Pathways

Serine proteinases in insect plasma have been implicated in two types of immune responses; that is, activation of prophenoloxidase (proPO) and activation of cytokine-like proteins. We have identified more than 20 serine proteinases in hemolymph of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, but functions are known for only a few of them. We report here functions of two additional M. sexta proteinases, hemolymph proteinases 6 and 8 (HP6 and HP8). HP6 and HP8 are each composed of an amino-terminal clip domain and a carboxyl-terminal proteinase domain. HP6 is an apparent ortholog of Drosophila Persephone, whereas HP8 is most similar to Drosophila and Tenebrio spätzle-activating enzymes, all of which activate the Toll pathway. proHP6 and proHP8 are expressed constitutively in fat body and hemocytes and secreted into plasma, where they are activated by proteolytic cleavage in response to infection. To investigate activation and biological activity of HP6 and HP8, we purified recombinant proHP8, proHP6, and mutants of proHP6 in which the catalytic serine was replaced with alanine, and/or the activation site was changed to permit activation by bovine factor Xa. HP6 was found to activate proPO-activating proteinase (proPAP1) in vitro and induce proPO activation in plasma. HP6 was also determined to activate proHP8. Active HP6 or HP8 injected into larvae induced expression of antimicrobial peptides and proteins, including attacin, cecropin, gloverin, moricin, and lysozyme. Our results suggest that proHP6 becomes activated in response to microbial infection and participates in two immune pathways; activation of PAP1, which leads to proPO activation and melanin synthesis, and activation of HP8, which stimulates a Toll-like pathway.Innate immune systems of mammals and arthropods include extracellular serine proteinase cascade pathways, which rapidly amplify responses to infection and stimulate killing of pathogens. These proteinase-driven processes include the complement system of vertebrates (1, 2) and pathways in arthropods involving proteinases containing amino-terminal clip domains (3). Clip domain proteinases function in blood coagulation (4, 5), activation of prophenoloxidase (proPO) that leads to melanin synthesis (6–9), and stimulation of the Toll pathway to promote synthesis of antimicrobial peptides/proteins (AMPs)² secreted into the hemolymph (10, 11).The serine proteinase systems best characterized in arthropods are the horseshoe crab hemolymph coagulation pathway and the cascade leading to activation of the Toll pathway in dorsal-ventral development in Drosophila (12–14). Recent research also has led to better characterization of the proPO activation pathway in Manduca sexta (7, 15, 16) and the Toll-signaling pathway in the Drosophila immune response (17, 18) and to both the proPO and Toll pathways in the beetle Tenebrio molitor (11, 19).In the proPO activation pathway, soluble pattern recognition proteins initially recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns such as bacterial peptidoglycan or fungal β-1,3-glucan (20–22). This interaction stimulates the sequential activation of a series of serine proteinases in hemolymph, leading to the activation of proPO-activating proteinase (PAP), also known as proPO activating enzyme (7, 23). Activated PAP converts inactive proPO to PO. PO catalyzes the hydroxylation of monophenols to o-diphenols and the oxidation of o-diphenols to quinones that are involved in microbial killing, melanin synthesis, sequestration of parasites or pathogens, and wound healing (24, 25). Other proteins required for proPO activation are clip-domain serine proteinase homologs (SPHs), whose catalytic serine is replaced with glycine and, therefore, lack proteolytic activity (26, 27). Serine proteinase inhibitors, including members of the serpin superfamily, regulate the activation of proPO by inhibiting the activating proteinases (28, 29).Drosophila clip-domain serine proteinases Persephone, Grass, Spirit, and spätzle-processing enzyme (SPE) participate in the activation of Toll pathway, stimulating synthesis of antimicrobial peptides as an innate immune response (18, 30–32). Although genetic evidence indicates that Persephone and Spirit are upstream of SPE in the cascade, the substrate(s) of Persephone and Spirit have not been identified, and which proteinase directly activates SPE is unknown. Neither is it clear whether these enzymes may be related to the melanization pathway, which involves clip-domain proteinases MP2 and MP1 (33).Here we report the functional characterization of M. sexta HP6 and HP8, probable orthologs of Drosophila Persephone and SPE, respectively. We developed methods to activate purified recombinant proHP6 and proHP8 and discovered that HP6 participates in proPO activation by activating proPAP1 and that both HP6 and HP8 function in a pathway that stimulates the synthesis of AMPs in M. sexta.     

Reconstitution of Rad53 Activation by Mec1 through Adaptor Protein Mrc1

Upon DNA replication stress, stalled DNA replication forks serve as a platform to recruit many signaling proteins, leading to the activation of the DNA replication checkpoint. Activation of Rad53, a key effector kinase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is essential for stabilizing DNA replication forks during replication stress. Using an activity-based assay for Rad53, we found that Mrc1, a replication fork-associated protein, cooperates with Mec1 to activate Rad53 directly. Reconstitution of Rad53 activation using purified Mec1 and Mrc1 showed that the addition of Mrc1 stimulated a more than 70-fold increase in the ability of Mec1 to activate Rad53. Instead of increasing the catalytic activity of Mec1, Mrc1 was found to facilitate the phosphorylation of Rad53 by Mec1 via promotion of a stronger enzyme-substrate interaction between them. Further, the conserved C-terminal domain of Mrc1 was found to be required for Rad53 activation. These results thus provide insights into the role of the adaptor protein Mrc1 in activating Rad53 in the DNA replication checkpoint.Faithful replication of the genome is important for the survival of all organisms. During DNA replication, replication stress can arise from a variety of situations, including intrinsic errors made by DNA polymerases, difficulties in replicating repeated DNA sequences, and failures to repair damaged DNA caused by either endogenous oxidative agents or exogenous mutagens such as UV light and DNA-damaging chemicals (1–3). In eukaryotes, there is an evolutionarily conserved DNA replication checkpoint that becomes activated in response to DNA replication stress. It helps to stabilize DNA replication forks, block late replication origin firing, and delay mitosis and ultimately helps recovery from stalled replication forks after DNA repair (4–7). Defects in the DNA replication checkpoint could result in elevated genomic instabilities, cancer development, or cell death (8, 9).Aside from replicating the genome, the DNA replication forks also provide a platform to assemble many signaling proteins that function in the DNA replication checkpoint. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mec1, an ortholog of human ATR,² is a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-like kinase (PIKK) involved in sensing stalled DNA replication forks. Mec1 forms a protein complex with Ddc2 (ortholog of human ATRIP). The Mec1-Ddc2 complex is recruited to stalled replication forks through replication protein A (RPA)-coated single-stranded DNA (10, 11). The Mec3-Rad17-Ddc1 complex, a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-like checkpoint clamp and ortholog of the human 9-1-1 complex, was shown to be loaded onto the single- and double-stranded DNA junction of the stalled replication forks by the clamp loader Rad24-RFC complex (12). Once loaded, the Mec3-Rad17-Ddc1 complex stimulates Mec1 kinase activity (13). Dbp11 and its homolog TopBP1 in vertebrates are known components of the replication machinery (14). In addition to regulating the initiation of DNA replication, they were found to play a role in the DNA replication checkpoint (15–17). They interact with the 9-1-1 complex and directly stimulate Mec1/ATR activity in vitro (18–20). Thus, the assembly of multiple protein complexes at stalled DNA replication forks appears to facilitate activation of the DNA replication checkpoint (13, 18).Mrc1 (for mediator of replication checkpoint) was originally identified to be important for cells to respond to hydroxyurea in S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (21, 22). Mrc1 is a component of the DNA replisome and travels with the replication forks along chromosome during DNA synthesis (23–25). Deletion of MRC1 causes defects in DNA replication, indicating its role in the normal progression of DNA replication (23). Interestingly, when DNA replication is blocked by hydroxyurea, Mrc1 undergoes Mec1- and Rad3 (S. pombe ortholog of Mec1)-dependent phosphorylation (21, 22). In S. cerevisiae, mutations of Mrc1 at the (S/T)Q sites, which are consensus phosphorylation sites of the Mec1/ATR family kinases, abolishes hydroxyurea-induced Mrc1 phosphorylation in vivo, suggesting a direct phosphorylation of Mrc1 by Mec1 (21, 22).Rad53 and Cds1, homologs of human Chk2, are the major effector kinases in the DNA replication checkpoints in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, respectively. Activation of Rad53 is a hallmark of DNA replication checkpoint activation and is important for the maintenance of DNA replication forks in response to DNA replication stress (5, 6). Thus, it is important to understand how Rad53 activity is controlled. Interestingly, mutation of all the (S/T)Q sites of Mrc1 not only abolishes the phosphorylation of Mrc1 by Mec1 but also compromises hydroxyurea-induced Rad53 activation in S. cerevisiae (21). Similarly, mutation of the TQ sites of Mrc1 in S. pombe was shown to abolish the binding between Cds1 and Mrc1 as well as Cds1 activation (22). Further, mutation of specific TQ sites of Mrc1 in S. pombe abolishes its binding to Cds1 in vitro and the activation of Cds1 in vivo (26). Thus, Mec1/Rad3-dependent phosphorylation of Mrc1 is responsible for Mrc1 binding to Rad53/Cds1, which is essential for Rad53/Cds1 activation.An intriguing property of the Chk2 family kinases is their ability to undergo autophosphorylation and activation in the absence of other proteins in vitro (27, 28). First, autophosphorylation of a conserved threonine residue in the activation loop of Chk2 family kinase was found to be an essential part of their activation processes (26, 29–31). Second, a direct and trans-phosphorylation of the N-terminal TQ sites of the Chk2 family kinases by the Mec1/ATR family kinases is also important for their activation in vivo. Analogous to the requirement of N-terminal TQ site phosphorylation of Chk2 by ATR in human (32), the activation of Rad53/Cds1 in vivo requires phosphorylation of TQ sites in their N termini by Mec1/Rad3 (33, 34).Considering that Mec1, Mrc1, and many other proteins are recruited at stalled DNA replication forks and have been shown to be involved in DNA replication checkpoint activation, a key question remains unresolved: what is the minimal system that is capable of activating Rad53 directly? Given the direct physical interaction between Mrc1 and Rad53 and the requirement of Mrc1 and Mec1 in vivo, it is likely that they both play a role in Rad53 activation. Furthermore, what is the molecular mechanism of Rad53 activation by its upstream activators? To address these questions, a faithful reconstitution of the activation of Rad53 using purified proteins is necessary. In this study, we developed an activity-based assay consisting of the Dun1 kinase, a downstream substrate of Rad53, and Sml1, as a substrate of Dun1, to quantitatively measure the activity of Rad53. Using this coupled kinase assay from Rad53 to Dun1 and then to Sml1, we screened for Mrc1 and its associated factors to see whether they could directly activate Rad53 in vitro. Our results showed that Mec1 and Mrc1 collaborate to constitute a minimal system in direct activation of Rad53.     

Characterization of Mycobacterium leprae RecA Intein, a LAGLIDADG Homing Endonuclease, Reveals a Unique Mode of DNA Binding, Helical Distortion, and Cleavage Compared with a Canonical LAGLIDADG Homing Endonuclease

Mycobacterium leprae, which has undergone reductive evolution leaving behind a minimal set of essential genes, has retained intervening sequences in four of its genes implicating a vital role for them in the survival of the leprosy bacillus. A single in-frame intervening sequence has been found embedded within its recA gene. Comparison of the M. leprae recA intervening sequence with the known intervening sequences indicated that it has the consensus amino acid sequence necessary for being a LAGLIDADG-type homing endonuclease. In light of massive gene decay and function loss in the leprosy bacillus, we sought to investigate whether its recA intervening sequence encodes a catalytically active homing endonuclease. Here we show that the purified M. leprae RecA intein (PI-MleI) binds to cognate DNA and displays endonuclease activity in the presence of alternative divalent cations, Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺. A combination of approaches, including four complementary footprinting assays such as DNase I, copper-phenanthroline, methylation protection, and KMnO₄, enhancement of 2-aminopurine fluorescence, and mapping of the cleavage site revealed that PI-MleI binds to cognate DNA flanking its insertion site, induces helical distortion at the cleavage site, and generates two staggered double strand breaks. Taken together, these results implicate that PI-MleI possesses a modular structure with separate domains for DNA target recognition and cleavage, each with distinct sequence preferences. From a biological standpoint, it is tempting to speculate that our findings have implications for understanding the evolution of the LAGLIDADG family of homing endonucleases.Mycobacterium leprae, a Gram-positive rod-shaped bacillus, mostly found in warm tropical countries, is the bacterium that causes leprosy in humans (1). The lack of understanding of the basic biology of M. leprae is believed to be the key factor for the failure of leprosy research to advance. The genome sequence of M. leprae contains 3.27 Mb and has an average G + C content of 57.8%, values much lower than the corresponding values for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which are ∼4.41 Mb and 65.6% G + C, respectively (2). There are some 1500 genes that are common to both M. leprae and M. tuberculosis. The comparative genome analysis suggests that both species of mycobacteria are derived from a common ancestor and, at one stage, had gene pools of similar size. The downsizing of the M. tuberculosis genome from ∼4.41 to 3.27 Mb of M. leprae would account for the loss of some 1200 protein-coding sequences (1, 3). There is evidence that many of the genes that were present in the genome of M. leprae have truly been lost (1, 3). Comparative genomics of M. leprae with that of M. tuberculosis indicate that the former has undergone substantial downsizing, losing more than 2000 genes, thus suggesting an extreme case of reductive evolution in a microbial pathogen (1). With the availability of the M. leprae genome sequence, using functional genomics approaches, it is possible to identify the gene products, elucidate the mechanism of their action, and identify novel drug targets for rational design of new therapeutic regimens and drugs to treat leprosy.Eubacterial RecA proteins catalyze a set of biochemical reactions that are essential for homologous recombination, DNA repair, restoration of stalled replication forks, and SOS response (4–7). RecA protein and the process of homologous recombination, which is the main mechanism of genetic exchange, are evolutionarily conserved among a range of organisms (4, 7). Perhaps the most striking development in the field of RecA protein biology was the discovery of an in-frame insertion of an intein-coding sequence in the recA genes of M. tuberculosis and M. leprae (8, 9). In these organisms, RecA is synthesized as a large precursor, which undergoes protein splicing to excise the intein, and the two flanking domains called exteins are ligated together to generate a functionally active RecA protein (9, 10). The milieu in which RecA precursor undergoes splicing differs substantially between M. tuberculosis and M. leprae. M. leprae RecA precursor (79 kDa) undergoes splicing only in mycobacterial species, whereas M. tuberculosis RecA precursor (85 kDa) is spliced efficiently in Escherichia coli as well (9–11). Intriguingly, M. tuberculosis and M. leprae RecA inteins differ greatly in their size, primary sequence, and location within the recA gene, thereby suggesting two independent origins during evolution (9). The occurrence of inteins in the obligate mycobacterial pathogens, M. tuberculosis, M. leprae, and Mycobacterium microti, suggested that RecA inteins might play a role in mycobacterial functions related to pathogenesis or virulence (9). Previously, we have shown that M. tuberculosis RecA intein (PI-MtuI),² which contains Walker A motif, displays dual target specificity in the presence of alternative cofactors in an ATP-dependent manner (12, 13).Since their discovery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (14, 15), a large number of putative homing endonucleases have been found in a diverse range of proteins in all the three domains of life (16–19). The majority of inteins possess the protein splicing and homing endonuclease activities (18, 19). Homing endonucleases are a class of diverse rare-cutting enzymes that promote site-specific transposition of their encoding genetic elements by inflicting double-stranded DNA breaks via different cleavage mechanisms in alleles lacking these elements (18–23). In addition, these are characterized by their ability to bind long DNA target sites (14–40 bp), and their tolerance of minor sequence changes in their binding region. These have been divided into highly divergent subfamilies on the basis of conserved sequence and structural motifs as follows: LAGLIDADG, GIY-YIG, HNH, His-Cys box, and the more recently identified PD(D/E)XK families (18–24). LAGLIDADG homing enzymes, which include the largest family, contain one or two copies of the conserved dodecapeptide motif and utilize an extended protein-DNA interface covering up to 40 bp to acquire their necessary specificity (18–22). The LAGLIDADG sequence is a part of the conserved 10- or 12-residue sequence motif defining the family of LAGLIDADG-type homing endonucleases; therefore, it is designated as deca- or dodecapeptide motif (19).Comparison of the M. leprae recA intervening sequence with known intervening sequences indicated that it has the consensus amino acid sequence necessary for being a LAGLIDADG-type homing endonuclease (25, 26). In light of massive gene decay and function loss in the leprosy bacillus, and dissimilarities in size and primary structures among mycobacterial inteins, we sought to investigate whether M. leprae recA intervening sequence encodes a catalytically active homing endonuclease. In this study, we show that the purified M. leprae RecA intein (PI-MleI) binds to cognate DNA and displays endonuclease activity in the presence of alternative divalent cations Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺. Furthermore, using a variety of approaches, we have mapped the positions of PI-MleI binding as well as cleavage in the cognate DNA, thus providing the most comprehensive analysis of PI-MleI. Taken together, these results suggest that PI-MleI possesses a modular structure with functionally separable domains for DNA target recognition and cleavage, each with distinct sequence preferences. These results provide insights into understanding the function and evolution of the family of LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases.     

Synthesis of Free and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen-bound Polyubiquitin Chains by the RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Rad5

In replicating yeast, lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains are extended from the ubiquitin moiety of monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (monoUb-PCNA) by the E2-E3 complex of (Ubc13-Mms2)-Rad5. This promotes error-free bypass of DNA damage lesions. The unusual ability of Ubc13-Mms2 to synthesize unanchored Lys⁶³-linked polyUb chains in vitro allowed us to resolve the individual roles that it and Rad5 play in the catalysis and specificity of PCNA polyubiquitination. We found that Rad5 stimulates the synthesis of free polyUb chains by Ubc13-Mms2 in part by enhancing the reactivity of the Ubc13∼Ub thiolester bond. Polyubiquitination of monoUb-PCNA was further enhanced by interactions between the N-terminal domain of Rad5 and PCNA. Thus, Rad5 acts both to align monoUb-PCNA with Ub-charged Ubc13 and to stimulate Ub transfer onto Lys⁶³ of a Ub acceptor. We also found that Rad5 interacts with PCNA independently of the number of monoubiquitinated subunits in the trimer and that it binds to both unmodified and monoUb-PCNA with similar affinities. These findings indicate that Rad5-mediated recognition of monoUb-PCNA in vivo is likely to depend upon interactions with additional factors at stalled replication forks.DNA is susceptible to chemical alteration by many endogenous and exogenous agents. To counter this threat and maintain genome integrity, eukaryotic cells employ three main strategies: DNA repair pathways that directly reverse DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints that allow time to repair the damage prior to replication, and DNA damage tolerance (DDT),² which is a method of bypassing DNA damage lesions during the DNA replication phase of the cell cycle.Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a key regulatory protein in DNA replication and repair (1). At the replication fork, DNA is encircled by PCNA, a homotrimeric protein that promotes processive movement of the replicative DNA polymerase. Upon DNA damage and subsequent stalling of the replicative polymerase, Ub modifications of PCNA signal DDT, which allows a cell to bypass the lesion and proceed past this potential block in replication (2–4).In the DDT pathway, as in other Ub-dependent pathways, Ub is conjugated to a substrate by the actions of three enzymes, an E1 activating enzyme, an E2 conjugating enzyme, and an E3 ligase (5). The E1 enzyme initiates the pathway in a two-step reaction that utilizes ATP hydrolysis to activate the C terminus of Ub, culminating in the formation of an E1∼Ub thiolester. Subsequent transthiolation to the active site cysteine of the E2 generates an E2∼Ub thiolester. An E3 ligase then brings a substrate into close proximity to the E2∼Ub intermediate, thereby catalyzing the formation of an isopeptide bond between the amino group of a substrate lysine and the C-terminal glycine of Ub. Polyubiquitination occurs when this substrate is another Ub, either free or as part of a Ub-protein conjugate.The DDT pathway is characterized by distinct ubiquitination events on PCNA that occur in two stages (3, 4, 6). The first of these is monoubiquitination of lysine 164 on one or more of the PCNA subunits by the E2-E3 complex of Rad6-Rad18 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3, 4, 7). monoUb-PCNA can serve either as a signal for error-prone bypass of the DNA lesion by recruiting translesion polymerases or as a substrate for subsequent polyubiquitination by the E2 heterodimer Ubc13-Mms2 and the E3 ligase Rad5 (3, 4, 8, 9). The polyUb chain extended from the initial Ub moiety on monoUb-PCNA is linked specifically through Ub Lys⁶³ residues. This Lys⁶³-linked chain is thought to enable a template switch mechanism that allows for error-free bypass of the DNA lesion, in part by utilizing the single-strand DNA-dependent helicase activity of Rad5 (3, 4, 10, 11). Both PCNA ubiquitination events promote bypass of the DNA lesion rather than direct removal or repair of the lesion.We have been interested in the mechanism by which the yeast (Ubc13-Mms2)-Rad5 complex catalyzes the formation of Lys⁶³-linked polyUb on PCNA. Previous studies have shown that heterodimerization of the Ubc13-Mms2 E2 is essential for Lys⁶³-specific Ub-Ub conjugation in vitro and in vivo (12–15). Ubc13 is a canonical E2 enzyme with an active site cysteine that receives activated Ub by transthiolation from the E1∼Ub complex (12, 13). This Ub is referred to as the “donor Ub.” Mms2 is a Ub E2 variant protein that lacks the active site cysteine (12, 15); rather, Mms2 binds to a second Ub, the “acceptor Ub,” and positions it to facilitate nucleophilic attack on the Ubc13∼Ub thiolester bond by the ϵ-amine of Lys⁶³ (15, 16). The positioning of the acceptor Ub by Mms2 controls the specificity of polyUb assembly such that only Lys⁶³-linked chains can be formed (16).Ubc13-Mms2 can synthesize Lys⁶³-linked chains in vitro in the absence of a PCNA substrate or an E3 ligase (12, 13). However, unlike the synthesis of free Lys⁶³-linked polyUb chains by Ubc13-Mms2, little is known about the polyubiquitination of PCNA or the role of the Rad5 E3 ligase in these reactions. Rad5 can bind PCNA and Rad18, and it contains a catalytic RING domain that characterizes the largest class of E3 ligases (17–21). There is evidence that RING E3s like Rad5 may play a more active role in ubiquitination than simply bringing the substrate into close proximity with the E2∼Ub. Several RING E3s have been shown to stimulate the synthesis of unanchored polyUb chains or autoubiquitination of their cognate E2s in the absence of substrates (22–24). This stimulation may be related to the ability of RING E3s to enhance reactivity of the E2∼Ub thiolester bond through allosteric effects (25, 26).Using purified recombinant forms of Ubc13, Mms2, and Rad5, we have explored the assembly of free Lys⁶³-linked polyUb chains as well as the extension of a polyUb chain on a synthetic analog of monoUb-PCNA. We show that Rad5 facilitates ubiquitination in part by increasing the reactivity of the Ubc13∼Ub thiolester bond. With monoUb-PCNA substrates, Rad5 also stimulated polyubiquitination through direct interactions with PCNA and recruitment of Ub-charged Ubc13-Mms2. Surprisingly, Rad5 recognition of monoUb-PCNA appeared to depend on interactions only with the PCNA moiety of the conjugate, which suggests that substrate selectivity in vivo is likely to depend on additional factors.     

Dual Nuclease and Helicase Activities of Helicobacter pylori AddAB Are Required for DNA Repair, Recombination, and Mouse Infectivity

Helicobacter pylori infection of the human stomach is associated with disease-causing inflammation that elicits DNA damage in both bacterial and host cells. Bacteria must repair their DNA to persist. The H. pylori AddAB helicase-exonuclease is required for DNA repair and efficient stomach colonization. To dissect the role of each activity in DNA repair and infectivity, we altered the AddA and AddB nuclease (NUC) domains and the AddA helicase (HEL) domain by site-directed mutagenesis. Extracts of Escherichia coli expressing H. pylori addA^NUCB or addAB^NUC mutants unwound DNA but had approximately half of the exonuclease activity of wild-type AddAB; the addA^NUCB^NUC double mutant lacked detectable nuclease activity but retained helicase activity. Extracts with AddA^HELB lacked detectable helicase and nuclease activity. H. pylori with the single nuclease domain mutations were somewhat less sensitive to the DNA-damaging agent ciprofloxacin than the corresponding deletion mutant, suggesting that residual nuclease activity promotes limited DNA repair. The addA^NUC and addA^HEL mutants colonized the stomach less efficiently than the wild type; addB^NUC showed partial attenuation. E. coli ΔrecBCD expressing H. pylori addAB was recombination-deficient unless H. pylori recA was also expressed, suggesting a species-specific interaction between AddAB and RecA and also that H. pylori AddAB participates in both DNA repair and recombination. These results support a role for both the AddAB nuclease and helicase in DNA repair and promoting infectivity.Infection of the stomach with Helicobacter pylori causes a variety of diseases including gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer (1). A central feature of the pathology of these conditions is the establishment of a chronic inflammatory response that acts both on the host and the infecting bacteria (2). Both epithelial (3, 4) and lymphoid (5, 6) cells in the gastric mucosa of infected individuals release DNA-damaging agents that can introduce double-stranded (ds)² breaks into the bacterial chromosome (7). The ds breaks must be repaired for the bacteria to survive and establish chronic colonization of the stomach. Homologous recombination is required for the faithful repair of DNA damage and bacterial survival. Alteration of the expression of one of a series of cell surface proteins on H. pylori occurs by an apparent gene conversion of babA, the frequency of which is reduced in repair-deficient strains (8, 9). This change in the cell surface, which may allow H. pylori to evade the host immune response, is a second means by which recombination can promote efficient colonization of the stomach by H. pylori.The initiation or presynaptic steps of recombination at dsDNA breaks in most bacteria involves the coordinated action of nuclease and helicase activities provided by one of two multisubunit enzymes, the AddAB and RecBCD enzymes (10). Escherichia coli recBCD null mutants have reduced cell viability, are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, and are homologous recombination-deficient (11–14). Similarly, H. pylori addA and addB null mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, have reduced frequencies of babA gene conversion, and colonize the stomach of mice less efficiently than wild-type strains (8).The activities of RecBCD enzyme from E. coli (15–19) and AddAB from H. pylori (8) or Bacillus subtilis (20–23) indicate some common general features of the presynaptic steps of DNA repair. In the case of E. coli, repair begins when the RecBCD enzyme binds to a dsDNA end and unwinds the DNA using its ATP-dependent helicase activities (17, 24). Single-stranded (ss) DNA produced during unwinding, with or without accompanying nuclease, is coated with RecA protein (16, 25). This recombinogenic substrate engages in strand exchange with a homologous intact duplex to form a joint molecule. Joint molecules are thought to be converted into intact, recombinant DNA either by replication or by cutting and ligation of exchanged strands (26).Although the AddAB and RecBCD enzymes appear to play similar roles in promoting recombination and DNA repair, they differ in several ways. RecBCD is a heterotrimer, composed of one copy of the RecB, RecC, and RecD gene products (27), whereas AddAB has two subunits, encoded by the addA and addB genes (21, 28). The enzyme subunit(s) responsible for helicase activity can be inferred from the presence of conserved protein domains or the activity of purified proteins. AddA, RecB, and RecD are superfamily I helicases with six highly conserved helicase motifs, including the conserved Walker A box found in many enzymes that bind ATP (29–32). A Walker A box is defined by the consensus sequence (G/A)XXGXGKT (X is any amino acid (29). RecBCD enzymes in which the conserved Lys in this motif is changed to Gln have a reduced affinity for ATP binding (33, 34) and altered helicase activity (17, 35–37).A nuclease domain with the conserved amino acid sequence LDYK is found in RecB, AddA, AddB, and many other nucleases (38). The conserved Asp plays a role in Mg²⁺ binding at the active site; Mg²⁺ is required for nuclease activity (39). The recB1080 mutation, which changes codon 1080 from the conserved Asp in this motif to Ala, eliminates nuclease activity (39).We have recently shown that addA and addB deletion mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and impaired in colonization of the mouse stomach compared with wild-type strains (8). To determine the roles of the individual helicase and nuclease activities of H. pylori AddAB in DNA repair and infectivity, we used site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the conserved nuclease domains of addA and addB and the conserved ATPase (helicase) domain of AddA. Here, we report that loss of the AddAB helicase is sufficient to impair H. pylori DNA repair and infectivity and, when the genes are expressed in E. coli, homologous recombination. AddAB retains partial activity in biochemical and genetic assays when either of the two nuclease domains is inactivated but loses all detectable nuclease activity when both domains are inactivated. Remarkably, H. pylori AddAB can produce recombinants in E. coli only in the presence of H. pylori RecA, suggesting a species-specific interaction in which AddAB facilitates the production of ssDNA-coated with RecA protein. Our results show that both the helicase and nuclease activities are required for the biological roles of H. pylori AddAB.     

Bloom Syndrome Helicase Stimulates RAD51 DNA Strand Exchange Activity through a Novel Mechanism

Loss or inactivation of BLM, a helicase of the RecQ family, causes Bloom syndrome, a genetic disorder with a strong predisposition to cancer. Although the precise function of BLM remains unknown, genetic data has implicated BLM in the process of genetic recombination and DNA repair. Previously, we demonstrated that BLM can disrupt the RAD51-single-stranded DNA filament that promotes the initial steps of homologous recombination. However, this disruption occurs only if RAD51 is present in an inactive ADP-bound form. Here, we investigate interactions of BLM with the active ATP-bound form of the RAD51-single-stranded DNA filament. Surprisingly, we found that BLM stimulates DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. In contrast to the helicase activity of BLM, this stimulation does not require ATP hydrolysis. These data suggest a novel BLM function that is stimulation of the RAD51 DNA pairing. Our results demonstrate the important role of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament conformation in stimulation of DNA pairing by BLM.Mutations of BLM helicase cause Bloom syndrome (BS),² a rare autosomal disorder, which is associated with stunted growth, facial sun sensitivity, immunodeficiency, fertility defects, and a greatly elevated incidence of many types of cancer occurring at an early age (1). BLM belongs to the highly conserved family of RecQ helicases that are required for the maintenance of genome integrity in all organisms (2, 3). There are five RecQ helicases in humans; mutations in three of them, WRN, RECQ4, and BLM, have been associated with the genetic abnormalities known as Werner, Rothmund-Thomson, and Bloom syndrome, respectively (4, 5). The cells from BS patients display genomic instability; the hallmark of BS is an increase in the frequency of sister chromatid and interhomolog exchanges (1, 6). Because homologous recombination (HR) is responsible for chromosomal exchanges, it is thought that BLM helicase functions in regulating HR (7–9). Also, BLM helicase is required for faithful chromosome segregation (10) and repair of stalled replication forks (11, 12), the processes that are linked to HR (13–15). BLM was found to interact physically with RAD51, a key protein of HR (16) that catalyzes the central steps in HR including the search for homology and the exchange of strands between homologous ssDNA and dsDNA sequences (17). In cells, BLM forms nuclear foci, a subset of which co-localize with RAD51. Interestingly, the extent of RAD51 and BLM co-localization increases in response to ionizing radiation, indicating a possible role of BLM in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (16).Biochemical studies suggest that BLM may perform several different functions in HR. BLM was shown to promote the dissociation of HR intermediates (D-loops) (18–20), branch migration of Holliday junctions (21), and dissolution of double Holliday junctions acting in a complex with TopoIIIα and BLAP75 (22–24). BLM may also facilitate DNA synthesis during the repair process by unwinding the DNA template in front of the replication fork (25). In addition, BLM and its yeast homolog Sgs1 may play a role at the initial steps of DNA double-strand break repair by participating in exonucleolitic resection of the DNA ends to generate DNA molecules with the 3′-ssDNA tails, a substrate for RAD51 binding (26–29).In vivo, the process of HR is tightly regulated by various mechanisms (30). Whereas some proteins promote HR (14, 31), others inhibit this process, thereby preventing its untimely initiation (32, 33). Disruption of the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament appears to be an especially important mechanism of controlling HR. This filament disruption activity was demonstrated for the yeast Srs2 helicase (34, 35) and human RECQ5 helicase (36). Recently, we found that BLM can also catalyze disruption of the RAD51-ssDNA filament (25). This disruption only occurs if the filament is present in an inactive ADP-bound form, e.g. in the presence of Mg²⁺. Conversion of RAD51 into an active ATP-bound form, e.g. in the presence of Ca²⁺ (37), renders the filament resistant to BLM disruption (25). In this study, we analyze the interactions of BLM with an active ATP-bound RAD51-ssDNA filament. Surprisingly, we found that BLM stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. Thus, depending on the conformational state of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament, BLM may either inhibit or stimulate the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. Our analysis demonstrated that, in contrast to several known stimulatory proteins that act by promoting formation of the RAD51-ssDNA filament, BLM stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51 at a later stage, during synapsis. Stimulation appears to be independent of the ATPase activity of BLM. We suggest that this stimulation of RAD51 may represent a novel function of BLM in homologous recombination.     

RecR-mediated Modulation of RecF Dimer Specificity for Single- and Double-stranded DNA

RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR, and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein. The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer, and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions, rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination (HR)² is one of the primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps (SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication (1). HR is initiated when RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex (2). The potential for genetic rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple levels (1). During replication, the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains, preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB (3, 4). Mutations in human proteins involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases (4–8). To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways, RecBCD and RecF (9, 10). A helicase/nuclease RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a sequence-specific manner (11–13). The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also process DSBs (14–20). Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria (21), including Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs (22, 23). In addition, the sequence or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2 proteins (4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is well documented by genetic and cellular approaches (18, 24–30), yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear, particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro (27). The UV-sensitive phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression, suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where HR initiation is required (31). In agreement with this hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions (32). RecF and RecR proteins also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to SSGs (33). These data suggest that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure (34). However, DNA binding experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis (11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea and eukaryotes (35). All known ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis (36–39). RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent ATPase (11, 40). RecF forms an ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and “signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization, ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage (35). Thus, RecF may function in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction. Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Roles of Human AND-1 in Chromosome Transactions in S Phase

Coordinated execution of DNA replication, checkpoint activation, and postreplicative chromatid cohesion is intimately related to the replication fork machinery. Human AND-1/chromosome transmission fidelity 4 is localized adjacent to replication foci and is required for efficient DNA synthesis. In S phase, AND-1 is phosphorylated in response to replication arrest in a manner dependent on checkpoint kinase, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related protein, and Cdc7 kinase but not on Chk1. Depletion of AND-1 increases DNA damage, delays progression of S phase, leads to accumulation of late S and/or G₂ phase cells, and induces cell death in cancer cells. It also elevated UV-radioresistant DNA synthesis and caused premature recovery of replication after hydroxyurea arrest, indicating that lack of AND-1 compromises checkpoint activation. This may be partly due to the decreased levels of Chk1 protein in AND-1-depleted cells. Furthermore, AND-1 interacts with cohesin proteins Smc1, Smc3, and Rad21/Scc1, consistent with proposed roles of yeast counterparts of AND-1 in sister chromatid cohesion. Depletion of AND-1 leads to significant inhibition of homologous recombination repair of an I-SceI-driven double strand break. Based on these data, we propose that AND-1 coordinates multiple cellular events in S phase and G₂ phase, such as DNA replication, checkpoint activation, sister chromatid cohesion, and DNA damage repair, thus playing a pivotal role in maintenance of genome integrity.Replication fork is not only the site of DNA synthesis but also the center for coordinated execution of various chromosome transactions. The preparation for replication forks starts in the G₁ phase, when the prereplicative complex composed of origin recognition and minichromosome maintenance assembles on the chromosome. At the G₁-S boundary, Cdc45, GINS complex, and other factors join the prereplicative complex to generate a complex capable of initiating DNA replication. A series of phosphorylation events mediated by cyclin-dependent kinase and Cdc7 kinase play crucial roles in this process and facilitate the generation of active replication forks (1–6). Purification of the putative replisome complex in yeast indicated the presence of the checkpoint mediator Mrc1 and fork protection complex proteins Tof1 and Csm3 in the replication fork machinery (7), consistent with a previous report on the genome-wide analyses with chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses on chip (microarray) (8). Mcm10 is another factor present in the isolated complex, required for loading of replication protein A (RPA)² and primase-DNA polymerase α onto the replisome complex (7, 9, 10).Replication fork machinery can cope with various stresses, including shortage of the cellular nucleotide pool and replication fork blockages that interfere with its progression. Stalled replication forks activate checkpoint pathways, leading to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, restart of DNA replication, or cell death in some cases (11–14). Single-stranded DNAs coated with RPA at the stalled replication forks are recognized by the ATR-ATR-interacting protein kinase complex and Rad17 for loading of the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 checkpoint clamp (14–16). Factors present in the replisome complex are also known to be required for checkpoint activation. Claspin, Tim, and Tipin functionally and physically associate with sensor and effector kinases and serve as mediator/adaptors (17–23). Mcm7, a component of the replicative DNA helicase in eukaryotes, was reported to associate with the checkpoint clamp loader Rad17 (24) and to have a distinct function in checkpoint (24, 25). We recently reported that Cdc7 kinase, known to be required for DNA replication initiation, plays a role in activation of DNA replication checkpoint possibly through regulating Claspin phosphorylation (26). Thus, it appears that DNA replication and checkpoint activation functionally and physically interact with each other.Another crucial cellular event for maintenance of genome stability is sister chromatid cohesion. The cohesin complex, a conserved apparatus required for sister chromatid cohesion, contains Smc1, Smc3, and Rad21/Scc1/Mcd1 proteins. The assembled cohesin complexes are loaded onto chromatin prior to DNA replication in G₁ phase and link the sister chromosomes during S and G₂ phase until mitosis when they separate (27, 28). The mitotic cohesion defects are not rescued by supplementing cohesin in G₂ phase, and it has been suggested that establishment of sister chromatid cohesion is coupled with DNA replication (29, 30). Indeed, yeast mutants in some replisome components show defect in sister chromosome cohesion or undergo chromosome loss (31–33). Cdc7 kinase is also required for efficient mitotic chromosome cohesion (34, 35).Human AND-1 is the putative homolog of budding yeast CTF4/Pob1/CHL15 and fission yeast Mcl1/Slr3. The budding yeast counterpart was identified as a replisome component described above (7), which travels along with the replication fork (29). CTF4 is nonessential for viability, but its interactions with primase, Rad2 (FEN1 family of nuclease), and Dna2 have implicated CTF4 in lagging strand synthesis and/or Okazaki fragment processing (36–39). Yeast CTF4 and Mcl1 are involved in chromosome cohesion (33, 40, 41) and genetically interact with a cohesin, Mcd1/Rad21 (40, 42). Recently, it was reported that human AND-1 protein interacts with human primase-DNA polymerase α and Mcm10 and is required for DNA synthesis (43).Here we confirm that human AND-1 protein is required for DNA replication and efficient progression of S phase, and we further show that it facilitates replication checkpoint. Depletion of AND-1 causes accumulation of DNA damage and cell cycle arrest at late S to G₂ phase, ultimately leading to cell death. Furthermore, we also show that human AND-1 physically interacts with cohesin proteins Smc1, Smc3, Rad21/Scc1, suggesting a possibility that AND-1 may physically and functionally link replisome and cohesin complexes in vivo. Recent studies indicate that sister chromatid cohesion is required for recombinational DNA repair (44–47). Thus, we examined the requirement of AND-1 for repair of artificially induced double-stranded DNA breaks and showed that AND-1 depletion leads to significant reduction of the double strand break repair. Possible roles of AND-1 in coordination of various chromosome transactions at a replication fork and in maintenance of genome integrity during S phase will be discussed.