Identification of the Active Form of Endothelial Lipase, a Homodimer in a Head-to-Tail Conformation

Endothelial lipase (EL) is a member of a subfamily of lipases that act on triglycerides and phospholipids in plasma lipoproteins, which also includes lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase. EL has a tropism for high density lipoprotein, and its level of phospholipase activity is similar to its level of triglyceride lipase activity. Inhibition or loss-of-function of EL in mice results in an increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol, making it a potential therapeutic target. Although hepatic lipase and lipoprotein lipase have been shown to function as homodimers, the active form of EL is not known. In these studies, the size and conformation of the active form of EL were determined. Immunoprecipitation experiments suggested oligomerization. Ultracentrifugation experiments showed that the active form of EL had a molecular weight higher than the molecular weight of a simple monomer but less than a dimer. A construct encoding a covalent head-to-tail homodimer of EL (EL-EL) was expressed and had similar lipolytic activity to EL. The functional molecular weights determined by radiation inactivation were similar for EL and the covalent homodimer EL-EL. We previously showed that EL could be cleaved by proprotein convertases, such as PC5, resulting in loss of activity. In cells overexpressing PC5, the covalent homodimeric EL-EL appeared to be more stable, with reduced cleavage and conserved lipolytic activity. A comparative model obtained using other lipase structures suggests a structure for the head-to-tail EL homodimer that is consistent with the experimental findings. These data confirm the hypothesis that EL is active as a homodimer in head-to-tail conformation.Three members of the triglyceride lipase family, lipoprotein lipase (LPL),³ hepatic lipase (HL), and endothelial lipase (EL), contribute to lipoprotein catabolism in the plasma compartment. They are all secreted proteins that bind to heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the luminal side of endothelial cells where they interact with their lipoprotein substrates. They have different specificities for lipoproteins, and all hydrolyze triglycerides and phosphatidylcholine at the sn-1 position, albeit with widely differing efficiencies (1). The preferred lipoprotein substrates for LPL are the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, chylomicrons, and very low density lipoproteins; the triglyceride lipase activity of LPL is more than 100-fold greater than its phospholipase activity. The primary lipoprotein substrates for HL are chylomicron remnants, intermediate density lipoproteins, and large triglyceridase-enriched HDL; its triglyceride lipase activity is about 20-fold higher than its phospholipase activity. EL is much more active on HDL, and its phospholipase activity is quite similar to its triglyceride lipase activity.These three lipolytic enzymes share a number of structural features. By analogy to the crystal structure of pancreatic lipase (2), another member of the triglyceride lipase family, each has a clearly defined N-terminal and C-terminal structural domain, joined by a hinge region. They are all serine esterases with a catalytic triad of serine, aspartic acid, and histidine located in the N-terminal domain. The catalytic triad is covered by a lid domain that contributes to the preference for either triglyceride or phospholipid substrates (3–6). The C-terminal domain contributes to lipid binding and determines the preferences for binding to lipoproteins (7–12). The N-terminal portion of the EL molecule contains the active site of the enzyme. However, when this portion of the molecule is expressed without the C-terminal domain, it lacks enzymatic activity against phospholipid (13), triglyceride, and the more soluble micellar substrate tributyrin.⁴ Thus, the presence of the C-terminal domain is necessary for activity. All three enzymes are glycosylated to varying degrees, and two of the glycosylation sites (one each in the N- and C-terminal domains) are common to all three enzymes (14, 15). All three enzymes are also heparin-binding proteins, and regions that contribute to heparin binding are found in both the N- and C-terminal domains (16–18).EL and, to a lesser extent, LPL are subject to proteolytic cleavage by proprotein convertases at a prototypical RXKR site in the hinge region, but HL lacks the site and is not cleaved (19, 20). The catalytically active forms of both LPL and HL have been shown to be homodimers (18, 21–27), and in the case of LPL, the orientation of the subunits of the dimer has been shown to be head-to-tail (28–30). The present study tested the hypothesis that EL also functions as a head-to-tail dimer.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Growth Factor Receptor-bound Protein-7 by Focal Adhesion Kinase in the Regulation of Cell Migration, Proliferation, and Tumorigenesis

We have previously reported that growth factor receptor-bound protein-7 (Grb7), an Src-homology 2 (SH2)-containing adaptor protein, enables interaction with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to regulate cell migration in response to integrin activation. To further elucidate the signaling events mediated by FAK·Grb7 complexes in promoting cell migration and other cellular functions, we firstly examined the phos pho ryl a ted tyrosine site(s) of Grb7 by FAK using an in vivo mutagenesis. We found that FAK was capable of phos pho rylating at least 2 of 12 tyrosine residues within Grb7, Tyr-188 and Tyr-338. Moreover, mutations converting the identified Tyr to Phe inhibited integrin-dependent cell migration as well as impaired cell proliferation but not survival compared with the wild-type control. Interestingly, the above inhibitory effects caused by the tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants are probably attributed to their down-regulation of phospho-Tyr-397 of FAK, thereby implying a mechanism by competing with wild-type Grb7 for binding to FAK. Consequently, these tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants evidently altered the phospho-Tyr-118 of paxillin and phos pho ryl a tion of ERK1/2 but less on phospho-Ser-473 of AKT, implying their involvement in the FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions. Additionally, we also illustrated that the formation of FAK·Grb7 complexes and Grb7 phos pho ryl a tion by FAK in an integrin-dependent manner were essential for cell migration, proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in A431 epidermal carcinoma cells, indicating the importance of FAK·Grb7 complexes in tumorigenesis. Our data provide a better understanding on the signal transduction event for FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions as well as to shed light on a potential therapeutic in cancers.Growth factor receptor bound protein-7 (Grb7)² is initially identified as a SH2 domain-containing adaptor protein bound to the activated EGF receptor (1). Grb7 is composed of an N-terminal proline-rich region, following a putative RA (Ras-associating) domain and a central PH (pleckstrin homology) domain and a BPS motif (between PH and SH2 domains), and a C-terminal SH2 domain (2–6). Despite the lack of enzymatic activity, the presence of multiple protein-protein interaction domains allows Grb7 family adaptor proteins to participate in versatile signal transduction pathways and, therefore, to regulate many cellular functions (4–6). A number of signaling molecules has been reported to interact with these featured domains, although most of the identified Grb7 binding partners are mediated through its SH2 domain. For example, the SH2 domain of Grb7 has been demonstrated to be capable of binding to the phospho-tyrosine sites of EGF receptor (1), ErbB2 (7), ErbB3 and ErbB4 (8), Ret (9), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (10), insulin receptor (11), SHPTP2 (12), Tek/Tie2 (13), caveolin (14), c-Kit (15), EphB1 (16), G6f immunoreceptor protein (17), Rnd1 (18), Shc (7), FAK (19), and so on. The proceeding α-helix of the PH domain of Grb7 is the calmodulin-binding domain responsible for recruiting Grb7 to plasma membrane in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner (20), and the association between the PH domain of Grb7 and phosphoinositides is required for the phosphorylation by FAK (21). Two additional proteins, NIK (nuclear factor κB-inducing kinase) and FHL2 (four and half lim domains isoform 2), in association with the GM region (Grb and Mig homology region) of Grb7 are also reported, although the physiological functions for these interactions remain unknown (22, 23). Recently, other novel roles in translational controls and stress responses through the N terminus of Grb7 are implicated for the findings of Grb7 interacting with the 5′-untranslated region of capped targeted KOR (kappa opioid receptor) mRNA and the Hu antigen R of stress granules in an FAK-mediated phosphorylation manner (24, 25).Unlike its member proteins Grb10 and Grb14, the role of Grb7 in cell migration is unambiguous and well documented. This is supported by a series of studies. Firstly, Grb7 family members share a significantly conserved molecular architecture with the Caenorhabditis elegans Mig-10 protein, which is involved in neuronal cell migration during embryonic development (4, 5, 26), suggesting that Grb7 may play a role in cell migration. Moreover, Grb7 is often co-amplified with Her2/ErbB2 in certain human cancers and tumor cell lines (7, 27, 28), and its overexpression resulted in invasive and metastatic consequences of various cancers and tumor cells (23, 29–33). On the contrary, knocking down Grb7 by RNA interference conferred to an inhibitory outcome of the breast cancer motility (34). Furthermore, interaction of Grb7 with autophosphorylated FAK at Tyr-397 could promote integrin-mediated cell migration in NIH 3T3 and CHO cells, whereas overexpression of its SH2 domain, an dominant negative mutant of Grb7, inhibited cell migration (19, 35). Recruitment and phosphorylation of Grb7 by EphB1 receptors enhanced cell migration in an ephrin-dependent manner (16). Recently, G7–18NATE, a selective Grb7-SH2 domain affinity cyclic peptide, was demonstrated to efficiently block cell migration of tumor cells (32, 36). In addition to cell migration, Grb7 has been shown to play a role in a variety of physiological and pathological events, for instance, kidney development (37), tumorigenesis (7, 14, 38–41), angiogenic activity (20), proliferation (34, 42, 43), anti-apoptosis (44), gene expression regulation (24), Silver-Russell syndrome (45), rheumatoid arthritis (46), atopic dermatitis (47), and T-cell activation (17, 48). Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown regarding the downstream signaling events of Grb7-mediated various functions. In particular, given the role of Grb7 as an adaptor molecule and its SH2 domain mainly interacting with upstream regulators, it will be interesting to identify potential downstream effectors through interacting with the functional GM region or N-terminal proline-rich region.In this report, we identified two tyrosine phosphorylated sites of Grb7 by FAK and deciphered the signaling targets downstream through these phosphorylated tyrosine sites to regulate various cellular functions such as cell migration, proliferation, and survival. In addition, our study sheds light on tyrosine phosphorylation of Grb7 by FAK involved in tumorigenesis.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]