Lipid Protein Interactions Couple Protonation to Conformation in a Conserved Cytosolic Domain of G Protein-coupled Receptors

The visual photoreceptor rhodopsin is a prototypical class I (rhodopsin-like) G protein-coupled receptor. Photoisomerization of the covalently bound ligand 11-cis-retinal leads to restructuring of the cytosolic face of rhodopsin. The ensuing protonation of Glu-134 in the class-conserved D(E)RY motif at the C-terminal end of transmembrane helix-3 promotes the formation of the G protein-activating state. Using transmembrane segments derived from helix-3 of bovine rhodopsin, we show that lipid protein interactions play a key role in this cytosolic “proton switch.” Infrared and fluorescence spectroscopic pK_a determinations reveal that the D(E)RY motif is an autonomous functional module coupling side chain neutralization to conformation and helix positioning as evidenced by side chain to lipid headgroup Foerster resonance energy transfer. The free enthalpies of helix stabilization and hydrophobic burial of the neutral carboxyl shift the side chain pK_a into the range typical of Glu-134 in photoactivated rhodopsin. The lipid-mediated coupling mechanism is independent of interhelical contacts allowing its conservation without interference with the diversity of ligand-specific interactions in class I G protein-coupled receptors.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)² are hepta-helical membrane proteins that couple a large variety of extracellular signals to cell-specific responses via activation of G proteins. In the visual photoreceptor rhodopsin, a prototypical class I GPCR (1, 2), molecular activation processes can be monitored in real time by spectroscopic assays and analyzed in the context of several crystal structures (3–8). The primary signal for rhodopsin is the 11-cis to all-trans photoisomerization of retinal covalently bound to the apoprotein opsin through a protonated Schiff base to Lys²⁹⁶. Current models converge toward a picture in which “microdomains” act as conformational switches that are coupled to different degrees to the primary activation process. Two activating “proton switches” have been identified (9) as follows: breakage of an intramolecular salt bridge (10) by transfer of the Schiff base proton to its counter ion Glu-113 (11) is followed by movement of helix-6 (H6) (12, 13) in the metarhodopsin II_a (MII_a) to MII_b transition. The MII_b state takes up a proton at Glu-134 (14) in the class-conserved D(E)RY motif at the C-terminal end of helix-3 (H3) leading to the MII_bH⁺ intermediate (15, 16), which activates transducin (G_t), the G protein of the photoreceptor cell. Glu-134 regulates the pH sensitivity of receptor signaling (17) in membranes as reviewed previously (18), and in complex with G_t the protonated state of the carboxyl group becomes stabilized (19). This charge alteration is linked to the release of an “ionic lock,” originally described for the β₂-adrenergic receptor (20), which also in rhodopsin stabilizes the inactive state (16) through interactions between the cytosolic ends of H3 and H6 (21).In the absence of a lipidic bilayer, proton uptake and H6 movement become uncoupled (15). Lipidic composition affects MII formation, rhodopsin structure, and oligomerization (22–24) and differs at the rhodopsin membrane interface from the bulk lipidic phase (25). Likewise, MII formation specifically affects lipid structure (26). Although of fundamental importance for GPCR activation, the potential implication of lipid protein interactions in “proton switching” is not clear. A functional role of Glu-134 in lipid interactions has been originally derived from IR spectra where E134Q replacement abolished changes of lipid headgroup vibrations in the MIIG_t complex (19). Computational approaches emphasized the “strategic” location of the D(E)RY motif (27), and the Glu-134 carboxyl pK_a may critically depend on the lipid protein interface (28). However, the implications for proton switching are not evident, and the theoretical interest is contrasted by the lack of experimental data addressing the effect of the lipidic phase on side chain protonation, secondary structure, and membrane topology of the D(E)RY motif.We have studied the coupling between conformation and protonation in single transmembrane segments derived from H3 of bovine rhodopsin. We have assessed the “modular” function of the D(E)RY motif by determining parameters not evident from the crystal structures, i.e. the pK_a of the conserved carboxyl, its linkage to helical structure, and the effect of protonation on side chain to lipid headgroup distance. We show that the D(E)RY motif encodes an autonomous “proton switch” controlling side chain exposure and helix formation in the low dielectric of a lipidic phase. The data ascribe a functional role to lipid protein interactions that couple the chemical potential of protons to an activity-promoting GPCR conformation in a ligand-independent manner.     

Complex Lipid Requirements for SNARE- and SNARE Chaperone-dependent Membrane Fusion

Membrane fusion without lysis has been reconstituted with purified yeast vacuolar SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors), the SNARE chaperones Sec17p/Sec18p and the multifunctional HOPS complex, which includes a subunit of the SNARE-interactive Sec1-Munc18 family, and vacuolar lipids: phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidic acid (PA), cardiolipin (CL), ergosterol (ERG), diacylglycerol (DAG), and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P). We now report that many of these lipids are required for rapid and efficient fusion of the reconstituted SNARE proteoliposomes in the presence of SNARE chaperones. Omission of either PE, PA, or PI3P from the complete set of lipids strongly reduces fusion, and PC, PE, PA, and PI3P constitute a minimal set of lipids for fusion. PA could neither be replaced by other lipids with small headgroups such as DAG or ERG nor by the acidic lipids PS or PI. PA is needed for full association of HOPS and Sec18p with proteoliposomes having a minimal set of lipids. Strikingly, PA and PE are as essential for SNARE complex assembly as for fusion, suggesting that these lipids facilitate functional interactions among SNAREs and SNARE chaperones.Biological membrane fusion is the regulated rearrangement of the lipids in two apposed sealed membranes to form one bilayer while mixing lumenal contents without leakage or lysis. It is fundamental for intracellular vesicular traffic, cell growth and division, regulated secretion of hormones and other blood proteins, and neurotransmission and thus has attracted wide and sustained study (1, 2). Its fundamental mechanisms are conserved and employ a Rab-family GTPase, proteins which bind to the GTP-bound form of a Rab, termed its “effectors” (3), and SNARE³ (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) proteins (4) with their attendant chaperones. SNAREs are integral or peripheral membrane proteins with characteristic heptad-repeat domains, which can associate in 4-helical coiled-coils (5), termed “cis-SNARE complexes,” if they are all anchored to the same membrane bilayer, or “trans-SNARE complexes” if they are anchored to apposed membranes.Stable membrane proximity (docking) does not suffice for fusion. Studies in model systems have shown that fusion can be promoted by any of several agents, which promote bilayer rearrangement, such as diacylglycerol (6), high levels of calcium (7), viral-encoded fusion proteins (8, 9), or SNAREs (10, 11). These studies frequently employed liposomes or proteoliposomes of simple lipid composition, suggesting that fusion may not have stringent requirements of lipid head group species. However, each of these model fusion reactions is accompanied by substantial lysis (12–15), whereas the preservation of subcellular compartments is a hallmark of physiological membrane fusion.We have studied membrane fusion with the vacuole (lysosome) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (reviewed in Ref. 16). The fusion of isolated vacuoles requires the Rab Ypt7p, 4 SNAREs (Vam3p, Vti1p, Vam7p, and Nyv1p), the SNARE chaperones Sec17p (α-soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein)/Sec18p (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor) and the hexameric HOPS complex (17), and key “regulatory” lipids including ERG, phosphoinositides, and DAG (18). HOPS interacts physically or functionally with each component of this fusion system. HOPS stably associates with Ypt7p in its GTP-bound state (19). One HOPS subunit, Vps33p, is a member of the Sec1-Munc18 family of SNARE-binding proteins, and HOPS exhibits direct affinity for SNAREs (17, 20–22) and proofreads correct vacuolar SNARE pairing (23). HOPS also has direct affinity for phosphoinositides (17). The SNAREs on isolated vacuoles are in cis-complexes, which are disassembled by Sec17p, Sec18p, and ATP (24). Docking requires Ypt7p (25) and HOPS (17). During docking, vacuoles are drawn against each other until each has a substantial membrane domain tightly apposed to the other. Each of the proteins (26) and lipids (18) required for fusion becomes enriched in a ring-shaped microdomain, the “vertex ring,” which surrounds the two tightly apposed membrane domains. Not only do the proteins depend on each other, in a cascade fashion, for vertex ring enrichment, and the lipids depend on each other for their vertex ring enrichment as well, but the lipids and proteins are mutually interdependent for their enrichment at this ring-shaped microdomain (18, 27). Fusion occurs around the ring, joining the two organelles. The fusion of vacuoles bearing physiological fusion constituents does not cause measurable organelle lysis, although fusion supported exclusively by higher levels of SNARE proteins is accompanied by massive lysis (28), in accord with model liposome studies (14). Thus fusion microdomain assembly and the coordinate action of SNAREs with other proteins and lipids to promote fusion without lysis are central topics in membrane fusion studies.Reconstitution of fusion with pure components allows chemical definition of essential elements of this biologically important reaction. Although SNAREs can drive a slow fusion of PC/PS proteoliposomes (29), this was not stimulated by HOPS and Sec17p/Sec18p (30). SNARE proteoliposomes bearing all the vacuolar lipids (18, 31–33), PC, PE, PI, PS, CL, PA, ERG, DAG, PI3P, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P₂), showed rapid and efficient fusion that was fully dependent on Sec17p/Sec18p and HOPS (30). The omission of either DAG, ERG, or phosphoinositide from the liposomes caused a marked reduction in fusion (30). We now report that PE and PA are also necessary for rapid and efficient fusion, function in distinct manners, and are required for efficient assembly of newly formed SNARE complexes by the SNARE chaperones Sec17p/Sec18p and HOPS.     

Structural and Functional Elucidation of the Mechanism Promoting Error-prone Synthesis by Human DNA Polymerase �� Opposite the 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxo-2��-deoxyguanosine Adduct

Human polymerase kappa (hPol κ) is one of four eukaryotic Y-class DNA polymerases and may be an important element in the cellular response to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzo[a]pyrene, which can lead to reactive oxygenated metabolite-mediated oxidative stress. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the activity and specificity of hPol κ bypass opposite the major oxidative adduct 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG). Unlike its archaeal homolog Dpo4, hPol κ bypasses this lesion in an error-prone fashion by inserting mainly dATP. Analysis of transient-state kinetics shows diminished “bursts” for dATP:8-oxoG and dCTP:8-oxoG incorporation, indicative of non-productive complex formation, but dATP:8-oxoG insertion events that do occur are 2-fold more efficient than dCTP:G insertion events. Crystal structures of ternary hPol κ complexes with adducted template-primer DNA reveal non-productive (dGTP and dATP) alignments of incoming nucleotide and 8-oxoG. Structural limitations placed upon the hPol κ by interactions between the N-clasp and finger domains combined with stabilization of the syn-oriented template 8-oxoG through the side chain of Met-135 both appear to contribute to error-prone bypass. Mutating Leu-508 in the little finger domain of hPol κ to lysine modulates the insertion opposite 8-oxoG toward more accurate bypass, similar to previous findings with Dpo4. Our structural and activity data provide insight into important mechanistic aspects of error-prone bypass of 8-oxoG by hPol κ compared with accurate and efficient bypass of the lesion by Dpo4 and polymerase η.DNA damage incurred by a multitude of endogenous and exogenous factors constitutes an inevitable challenge for the replication machinery, and various mechanisms exist to either remove the resulting lesions or bypass them in a more or less mutation-prone fashion (1). Error-prone polymerases are central to trans-lesion synthesis across sites of damaged DNA (2, 3). Four so-called Y-class DNA polymerases have been identified in humans, Pol η,⁴ Pol ι, Pol κ, and Rev1, which exhibit different activities and abilities to replicate past a flurry of individual lesions (4, 5). Homologs have also been identified and characterized in other organisms, notably DinB (Pol IV) in Escherichia coli (6–8), Dbh in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (9, 10), and Dpo4 in Sulfolobus solfataricus (11, 12). A decade of investigations directed at the structural and functional properties of bypass polymerases have significantly improved our understanding of this class of enzymes (5, 13). A unique feature of Y-class polymerases, compared with the common right-handed arrangement of palm, thumb, and finger subdomains of high fidelity (i.e. A-class) DNA polymerases (14), is a “little finger” or “PAD” (palm-associated domain) subdomain that plays a crucial role in lesion bypass (12, 15–21). In addition to the little finger subdomain at the C-terminal end of the catalytic core, both Rev1 and Pol κ exhibit an N-terminal extension that is absent in other translesion polymerases. The N-terminal extension in the structure of the ternary (human) hPol κ·DNA·dTTP complex folds into a U-shaped tether-helix-turn-helix “clasp” that is located between the thumb and little finger domains, allowing the polymerase to completely encircle the DNA (18). Although the precise role of the clasp for lesion bypass by hPol κ remains to be established, it is clear that this entity is functionally important, because mutant enzymes with partially or completely removed clasps exhibit diminished catalytic activity compared with the full-length catalytic core (hPol κ N1–526) or a core lacking the N-terminal 19 residues (hPol κ N19–526; the construct used for crystal structure determination of the ternary complex (18)).7,8-Dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG), found in both lower organisms and eukaryotes, is a major lesion that is a consequence of oxidative stress. The lesion is of relevance not only because of its association with cancer (22, 23), but also in connection with aging (24), hepatitis (25), and infertility (26). It is far from clear which DNA polymerases bypass 8-oxoG most often in a cellular context, but given the ubiquitous nature of the lesion it seems likely that more than one enzyme could encounter the lesion. Replicative polymerases commonly insert dATP opposite template 8-oxoG, with the lesion adopting the preferred syn conformation (e.g. 27, 28). It was recently found that the translesion polymerase Dpo4 from S. solfataricus synthesizes efficiently past 8-oxoG, inserting ≥95% dCTP > dATP opposite the lesion (29, 30). The efficient and low error bypass of the 8-oxoG lesion by Dpo4 is associated to a large extent with an arginine residue in the little finger domain (17). In the crystal structure of the ternary Dpo4·DNA·dCTP complex, the side chain of Arg-332 forms a hydrogen bond to the 8-oxygen of 8-oxoG, thus shifting the nucleoside conformational equilibrium toward the anti state and enabling a Watson-Crick binding mode with the incoming dCTP (30). The efficient and accurate replication of templates bearing 8-oxoG by yeast Pol η (31, 32) may indicate similarities between the bypass reactions catalyzed by the archaeal and eukaryotic enzymes. In contrast, bypass synthesis opposite 8-oxoG by human Pol κ is error-prone, resulting in efficient incorporation of A (33–35). The inaccurate bypass of 8-oxoG is thought to contribute to the deleterious effects associated with the lesion. These observations indicate different behaviors of the eukaryotic trans-lesion Pol κ and its archaeal “homolog” Dpo4 vis-à-vis the major oxidative stress lesion 8-oxoG. A mechanistic understanding of human DNA polymerases that bypass 8-oxoG in an error-prone fashion, such as hPol κ, is therefore of great interest.To elucidate commonalities and differences between the trans-8-oxoG syntheses of S. solfataricus Dpo4, yeast Pol η, and hPol κ, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the bypass activity for the latter with template·DNA containing the 8-oxoG lesion, including pre-steady-state and steady-state kinetics of primer extension opposite and beyond 8-oxoG and LC-MS/MS assays of full-length extension products. We determined crystal structures of ternary hPol κ-(8-oxoG)DNA-dGTP and hPol κ-(8-oxoG)DNA-dATP complexes, apparently the first for any complex with adducted DNA for the κ enzyme reported to date. Our work demonstrates clear distinctions between genetically related translesion polymerases and provides insights into the origins of the error-prone reactions opposite 8-oxoG catalyzed by Y-family DNA polymerases.     

Molecular Chaperone Hsp70/Hsp90 Prepares the Mitochondrial Outer Membrane Translocon Receptor Tom71 for Preprotein Loading

The preproteins targeted to the mitochondria are transported through the translocase of the outer membrane complex. Tom70/Tom71 is a major surface receptor of the translocase of the outer membrane complex for mitochondrial preproteins. The preproteins are escorted to Tom70/Tom71 by molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90. Here we present the high resolution crystal structures of Tom71 and the protein complexes between Tom71 and the Hsp70/Hsp90 C terminus. The crystal structures indicate that Tom70/Tom71 may exhibit two distinct states. In the closed state, the N-terminal domain of Tom70/Tom71 partially blocks the preprotein-binding pocket. In the open state, the N-terminal domain moves away, and the preprotein-binding pocket is fully exposed. The complex formation between the C-terminal EEVD motif of Hsp70/Hsp90 and Tom71 could lock Tom71 in the open state where the preprotein-binding pocket of Tom71 is ready to receive preproteins. The interactions between Hsp70/Hsp90 and Tom71 N-terminal domain generate conformational changes that may increase the volume of the preprotein-binding pocket. The complex formation of Hsp70/Hsp90 and Tom71 also generates significant domain rearrangement within Tom71, which may position the preprotein-binding pocket closer to Hsp70/Hsp90 to facilitate the preprotein transfer from the molecular chaperone to Tom71. Therefore, molecular chaperone Hsp70/Hsp90 may function to prepare the mitochondrial outer membrane receptor Tom71 for preprotein loading.The mitochondrion plays important roles in cell physiology. The mitochondrion functions as the “cellular power house” by generating most of the supply of ATP for the cell. In addition, the mitochondrion is involved in a number of critical cellular processes including the synthesis of metabolites, lipid metabolism, free radical production, and metal ion homeostasis. The mitochondrion consists of four compartments, the outer membrane, the inner membrane, the intermembrane space, and the mitochondrial matrix. The mitochondrion contains a large number of proteins (1), but only a few of these are translated within the mitochondrion (2). Therefore, the majority of the mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and translocated into the mitochondrion.The mitochondrial preproteins contain specific targeting signals to reach the correct compartments within the mitochondria. The mitochondrial matrix preproteins contain N-terminal targeting sequences that form the short amphipathic helices (2–6). On the other hand, some mitochondrial proteins of the inner and outer membrane contain internal targeting signals within the mature proteins (7). The mitochondrion has developed a set of delicate translocons to transport the preproteins into the mitochondrial compartments, one translocase of the outer membrane (TOM)² and two translocases of the inner membrane (TIM23 and TIM22) (4, 5, 8). The TOM complex has two surface receptors, Tom20 and Tom70 (9, 10). Tom20 recognizes the N-terminal mitochondrial targeting signals from the preproteins, whereas Tom70 binds to internal targeting sequences of preproteins such as the multi-transmembrane carrier proteins residing in the mitochondrial membranes (9–12). The crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tom70 revealed that Tom70 contained 11 TPR motifs, and the TPR motifs were clustered into two domains. The three TPR motifs in the N-terminal domain of Tom70p form a peptide-binding groove for the C-terminal EEVD motif of Hsp70/Hsp90, whereas the C-terminal domain of Tom70p contains a large preprotein-binding pocket (13).Molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90 play important roles in targeting the preproteins to TOM complex (14). Hsp70 and Hsp90 can protect these preproteins from aggregation in the cytosol (15). The C-terminal EEVD motifs of Hsp70/Hsp90 may interact directly with the N-terminal domain of Tom70p to target the preproteins to TOM complex (13, 14, 16). The C-terminal EEVD motif of Hsp70/Hsp90 has been indicated to bind several proteins containing TPR motifs including Hop and CHIP. The complex structures for the Hsp70/Hsp90 EEVD motif and Hop and CHIP TPR regions have been determined (17–21).Tom71 (also known as Tom72) was identified as a homologue with Tom70 with high amino acid sequence identity (>50%) (22). Tom71 shares overlapping functions with Tom70 to transfer the preproteins and maintain the mitochondrial morphology (23, 24). In this study, we have determined the crystal structures of S. cerevisiae Tom71 and the complexes of Tom71 and Hsp70/Hsp90 C-terminal EEVD motifs. These structures suggest that the Hsp70/Hsp90 binding to Tom70/Tom71 may keep Tom70/Tom71 in the open state for receiving preproteins. The Hsp70/Hsp90 interactions may also increase the volume of the preprotein-binding pocket of Tom70/Tom71 and prepare Tom70/Tom71 for preprotein loading.     

Secreted Versus Membrane-anchored Collagenases: RELATIVE ROLES IN FIBROBLAST-DEPENDENT COLLAGENOLYSIS AND INVASION*

Fibroblasts degrade type I collagen, the major extracellular protein found in mammals, during events ranging from bulk tissue resorption to invasion through the three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Current evidence suggests that type I collagenolysis is mediated by secreted as well as membrane-anchored members of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) gene family. However, the roles played by these multiple and possibly redundant, degradative systems during fibroblast-mediated matrix remodeling is undefined. Herein, we use fibroblasts isolated from Mmp13^−/−, Mmp8^−/−, Mmp2^−/−, Mmp9^−/−, Mmp14^−/− and Mmp16^−/− mice to define the functional roles for secreted and membrane-anchored collagenases during collagen-resorptive versus collagen-invasive events. In the presence of a functional plasminogen activator-plasminogen axis, secreted collagenases arm cells with a redundant collagenolytic potential that allows fibroblasts harboring single deficiencies for either MMP-13, MMP-8, MMP-2, or MMP-9 to continue to degrade collagen comparably to wild-type fibroblasts. Likewise, Mmp14^−/− or Mmp16^−/− fibroblasts retain near-normal collagenolytic activity in the presence of plasminogen via the mobilization of secreted collagenases, but only Mmp14 (MT1-MMP) plays a required role in the collagenolytic processes that support fibroblast invasive activity. Furthermore, by artificially tethering a secreted collagenase to the surface of Mmp14^−/− fibroblasts, we demonstrate that localized pericellular collagenolytic activity differentiates the collagen-invasive phenotype from bulk collagen degradation. Hence, whereas secreted collagenases arm fibroblasts with potent matrix-resorptive activity, only MT1-MMP confers the focal collagenolytic activity necessary for supporting the tissue-invasive phenotype.In the postnatal state, fibroblasts are normally embedded in a self-generated three-dimensional connective tissue matrix composed largely of type I collagen, the major extracellular protein found in mammals (1–3). Type I collagen not only acts as a structural scaffolding for the associated mesenchymal cell populations but also regulates gene expression and cell function through its interactions with collagen binding integrins and discoidin receptors (2, 4). Consistent with the central role that type I collagen plays in defining the structure and function of the extracellular matrix, the triple-helical molecule is resistant to almost all forms of proteolytic attack and can display a decades-long half-life in vivo (4–6). Nonetheless, fibroblasts actively remodel type I collagen during wound healing, inflammation, or neoplastic states (2, 7–13).To date type I collagenolytic activity is largely confined to a small subset of fewer than 10 proteases belonging to either the cysteine proteinase or matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)² gene families (4, 14–18). As all collagenases are synthesized as inactive zymogens, complex proteolytic cascades involving serine, cysteine, metallo, and aspartyl proteinases have also been linked to collagen turnover by virtue of their ability to mediate the processing of the pro-collagenases to their active forms (13, 15, 19). After activation, each collagenase can then cleave native collagen within its triple-helical domain, thus precipitating the unwinding or “melting” of the resulting collagen fragments at physiologic temperatures (4, 15). In turn, the denatured products (termed gelatin) are susceptible to further proteolysis by a broader class of “gelatinases” (4, 15). Collagen fragments are then either internalized after binding to specific receptors on the cell surface or degraded to smaller peptides with potent biological activity (20–24).Previous studies by our group as well as others have identified MMPs as the primary effectors of fibroblast-mediated collagenolysis (20, 25, 26). Interestingly, adult mouse fibroblasts express at least six MMPs that can potentially degrade type I collagen, raising the possibility of multiple compensatory networks that are designed to preserve collagenolytic activity (25). Four of these collagenases belong to the family of secreted MMPs, i.e. MMP-13, MMP-8, MMP-2, and MMP-9, whereas the other two enzymes are members of the membrane-type MMP subgroup, i.e. MMP-14 (MT1-MMP) and MMP-16 (MT3-MMP) (13, 27–29). From a functional perspective, the specific roles that can be assigned to secreted versus membrane-anchored collagenases remain undefined. As such, fibroblasts were isolated from either wild-type mice or mice harboring loss-of-function deletions in each of the major secreted and membrane-anchored collagenolytic genes, and the ability of the cells to degrade type I collagen was assessed. Herein, we demonstrate that fibroblasts mobilize either secreted or membrane-anchored MMPs to effectively degrade type I collagen in qualitatively and quantitatively distinct fashions. However, under conditions where fibroblasts use either secreted and membrane-anchored MMPs to exert quantitatively equivalent collagenolytic activity, only MT1-MMP plays a required role in supporting a collagen-invasive phenotype. These data establish a new paradigm wherein secreted collagenases are functionally limited to bulk collagenolytic processes, whereas MT1-MMP uniquely arms the fibroblast with a focalized degradative activity that mediates subjacent collagenolysis as well as invasion.     

Vinyl Sulfones as Antiparasitic Agents and a Structural Basis for Drug Design

Cysteine proteases of the papain superfamily are implicated in a number of cellular processes and are important virulence factors in the pathogenesis of parasitic disease. These enzymes have therefore emerged as promising targets for antiparasitic drugs. We report the crystal structures of three major parasite cysteine proteases, cruzain, falcipain-3, and the first reported structure of rhodesain, in complex with a class of potent, small molecule, cysteine protease inhibitors, the vinyl sulfones. These data, in conjunction with comparative inhibition kinetics, provide insight into the molecular mechanisms that drive cysteine protease inhibition by vinyl sulfones, the binding specificity of these important proteases and the potential of vinyl sulfones as antiparasitic drugs.Sleeping sickness (African trypanosomiasis), caused by Trypanosoma brucei, and malaria, caused by Plasmodium falciparum, are significant, parasitic diseases of sub-Saharan Africa (1). Chagas'' disease (South American trypanosomiasis), caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, affects approximately, 16–18 million people in South and Central America. For all three of these protozoan diseases, resistance and toxicity to current therapies makes treatment increasingly problematic, and thus the development of new drugs is an important priority (2–4).T. cruzi, T. brucei, and P. falciparum produce an array of potential target enzymes implicated in pathogenesis and host cell invasion, including a number of essential and closely related papain-family cysteine proteases (5, 6). Inhibitors of cruzain and rhodesain, major cathepsin L-like papain-family cysteine proteases of T. cruzi and T. brucei rhodesiense (7–10) display considerable antitrypanosomal activity (11, 12), and some classes have been shown to cure T. cruzi infection in mouse models (11, 13, 14).In P. falciparum, the papain-family cysteine proteases falcipain-2 (FP-2)⁶ and falcipain-3 (FP-3) are known to catalyze the proteolysis of host hemoglobin, a process that is essential for the development of erythrocytic parasites (15–17). Specific inhibitors, targeted to both enzymes, display antiplasmodial activity (18). However, although the abnormal phenotype of FP-2 knock-outs is “rescued” during later stages of trophozoite development (17), FP-3 has proved recalcitrant to gene knock-out (16) suggesting a critical function for this enzyme and underscoring its potential as a drug target.Sequence analyses and substrate profiling identify cruzain, rhodesain, and FP-3 as cathepsin L-like, and several studies describe classes of small molecule inhibitors that target multiple cathepsin L-like cysteine proteases, some with overlapping antiparasitic activity (19–22). Among these small molecules, vinyl sulfones have been shown to be effective inhibitors of a number of papain family-like cysteine proteases (19, 23–27). Vinyl sulfones have many desirable attributes, including selectivity for cysteine proteases over serine proteases, stable inactivation of the target enzyme, and relative inertness in the absence of the protease target active site (25). This class has also been shown to have desirable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles in rodents, dogs, and primates (28, 29). We have determined the crystal structures of cruzain, rhodesain, and FP-3 bound to vinyl sulfone inhibitors and performed inhibition kinetics for each enzyme. Our results highlight key areas of interaction between proteases and inhibitors. These results help validate the vinyl sulfones as a class of antiparasitic drugs and provide structural insights to facilitate the design or modification of other small molecule inhibitor scaffolds.     

Characterization of the Endocannabinoid System in Human Neuronal Cells and Proteomic Analysis of Anandamide-induced Apoptosis

Anandamide (AEA) is an endogenous agonist of type 1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1R) that, along with metabolic enzymes of AEA and congeners, compose the “endocannabinoid system.” Here we report the biochemical, morphological, and functional characterization of the endocannabinoid system in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells that are an experimental model for neuronal cell damage and death, as well as for major human neurodegenerative disorders. We also show that AEA dose-dependently induced apoptosis of SH-SY5Y cells. Through proteomic analysis, we further demonstrate that AEA-induced apoptosis was paralleled by an ∼3 to ∼5-fold up-regulation or down-regulation of five genes; IgG heavy chain-binding protein, stress-induced phosphoprotein-1, and triose-phosphate isomerase-1, which were up-regulated, are known to act as anti-apoptotic agents; actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5 and peptidylprolyl isomerase-like protein 3 isoform PPIL3b were down-regulated, and the first is required for actin network formation whereas the second is still function-orphan. Interestingly, only the effect of AEA on BiP was reversed by the CB1R antagonist SR141716, in SH-SY5Y cells as well as in human neuroblastoma LAN-5 cells (that express a functional CB1R) but not in SK-NBE cells (which do not express CB1R). Silencing or overexpression of BiP increased or reduced, respectively, AEA-induced apoptosis of SH-SY5Y cells. In addition, the expression of BiP and of the BiP-related apoptotic markers p53 and PUMA was increased by AEA through a CB1R-dependent pathway that engages p38 and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinases. Consistently, this effect of AEA was minimized by SR141716. In conclusion, we identified BiP as a key protein in neuronal apoptosis induced by AEA.Endocannabinoids bind to and activate both type 1 (CB1R)⁴ and type 2 (CB2R) cannabinoid receptors and are widely recognized as important regulators of central and peripheral functions (1–3). The most studied endocannabinoids are anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine, AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) (1, 3). AEA, unlike 2-AG, binds to and activates also transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), thus being considered a true “endovanilloid” (4).The “endocannabinoid system (ECS)” includes the receptors, their ligands AEA and 2-AG, and the enzymes that synthesize (N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine-hydrolyzing phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD) and diacylglycerol lipase (DAGL)) or degrade (fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL)) AEA and 2-AG, respectively (1–3). On the other hand, there is still controversy about the identity and even the existence of purported “endocannabinoid transporters” that have not yet been cloned, isolated, or characterized (5). A growing interest is concerned with the ability of AEA to induce apoptosis in neuronal and non-neuronal cells (for comprehensive reviews see Refs. 6–9). Such a pro-apoptotic activity of AEA appears to be mediated by divergent pathways, each potentiated, reduced, or unaffected by cannabinoid or TRPV1 receptors (6–9). They can also be dependent on membrane cholesterol content (10, 11), generation of reactive oxygen species (12, 13), or even release of ethanolamine from AEA catalyzed by FAAH (14). In this context, it should be stressed that data on ECS and AEA-induced apoptosis in human neuronal cells are still very scant. Furthermore, a proteomic analysis of AEA-induced apoptosis has never been performed, leaving open the question of which proteins (if any) might be modulated at the level of expression upon induction of programmed cell death by this endocannabinoid. On this basis, we sought to characterize through functional and immunochemical assays and confocal microscopy the ECS components in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. In addition, we performed a proteomic analysis of AEA-induced apoptosis in these cells that identified five proteins whose expression was modified. Among these proteins, one (BiP/GRP78) was shown to be modulated by AEA in a CB1R-dependent manner, in parallel with apoptosis. Through silencing and overexpression experiments, it was found to be a key player in the death program.     

Germ Line-governed Recognition of a Cancer Epitope by an Immunodominant Human T-cell Receptor

CD8⁺ T-cells specific for MART-1-(26–35), a dominant melanoma epitope restricted by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*0201, are exceptionally common in the naive T-cell repertoire. Remarkably, the TRAV12-2 gene is used to encode the T-cell receptor α (TCRα) chain in >87% of these T-cells. Here, the molecular basis for this genetic bias is revealed from the structural and thermodynamic properties of an archetypal TRAV12-2-encoded TCR complexed to the clinically relevant heteroclitic peptide, ELAGIGILTV, bound to HLA-A*0201 (A2-ELA). Unusually, the TRAV12-2 germ line-encoded regions of the TCR dominate the major atomic contacts with the peptide at the TCR/A2-ELA interface. This “innate” pattern of antigen recognition probably explains the unique characteristics and extraordinary frequencies of CD8⁺ T-cell responses to this epitope.Malignant melanoma is responsible for 75% of all skin cancer-related deaths worldwide, and the global incidence is rising. The MART-1 (1) protein, also known as Melan-A (2), is expressed by virtually all fresh melanoma tumor specimens and elicits natural CD8⁺ T-cell responses (3, 4) that can lead to spontaneous disease regression (reviewed in Ref. 5). Consequently, CD8⁺ T-cell responses directed against the MART-1 protein have been investigated extensively (reviewed in Refs. 2, 6, and 7), and heteroclitic forms of the dominant MART-1-(26–35) peptide epitope (8, 9), which is restricted by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*0201, are currently being used in a number of clinical trials (10–12). In recent developments, adoptive T-cell therapy directed against the MART-1 protein has been used to mediate cancer regression in ∼50% of late stage melanoma patients (13). However, these approaches have not proved to be universally effective, and there remains considerable scope for improvement. In order to design more effective immune-based therapies against the MART-1 protein, it is essential to understand the precise molecular rules that govern the interaction between T-cell receptors (TCRs)⁶ and the HLA-A*0201·MART-1-(26–35) complex. Previous structural studies of human TCR/peptide major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interactions (14–16) indicate that specific regions of the TCR have different roles during antigen engagement; thus, the germ line-encoded complementarity-determining region 1 and 2 (CDR1 and -2) loops contact mainly the conserved helical region of the MHC surface, and the more variable somatically rearranged CDR3 loops contact mainly the antigenic peptide. Dissecting the nature of these contacts, which have been shown to be highly variable for individual TCR/pMHC interactions (17–19), is an important step toward understanding the principles of antigen recognition and for the development of improved T-cell vaccines (20). However, the current data base of human TCR·pMHC complexes reported in the literature is limited (∼16), compared with >100 antibody-antigen structures. This has made it difficult to ascertain whether there are conserved binding modes for TCR/pMHC interactions dictated by a number of specific contacts or whether there are potentially unlimited numbers of TCR docking orientations dependent on the nature of individual recognition events. Furthermore, there are no examples to date of human TCR·pMHC class I structures in which the bound peptide is a decamer; this represents a substantial deficiency in our current knowledge, given the preponderance with which decamer peptides are processed, presented, and recognized. The low number of TCR·pMHC complex structures solved to date reflects technical difficulties inherent in the production of soluble TCR and pMHC molecules that retain stability and challenges related to the crystallization of complexes with relatively low binding affinities (K_D = 0.1–500 μm) (21, 22). In general, TCRs specific for tumor-derived epitopes bind in the weaker range of TCR/pMHC affinities (21). This obstacle to the generation of high quality co-complex crystals is underscored by the fact that only one other tumor-specific human TCR·pMHCI complex structure has been documented previously (23).In this study, we expressed a soluble TCR (MEL5) specific for ELAGIGILTV, the common MART-1-(26–35) heteroclitic peptide, complexed to HLA-A*0201 (A2-ELA). Notably, HLA-A*0201 is the most common HLA allele in the human population (24). The CDR1 and CDR2 loops of this TCR are encoded by the TRAV12-2 and TRBV30 genes (International Immunogenetics (IMGT) nomenclature). Interestingly, the TRAV12-2 gene is expressed in the vast majority of CD8⁺ T-cell populations specific for HLA-A*0201·MART-1-(26–35) across multiple individuals (25, 26). To resolve the enigma of the dominant TRAV12-2 gene and determine the molecular characteristics that govern CD8⁺ T-cell recognition of the HLA-A*0201·MART-1-(26–35) antigen, we performed a biophysical, thermodynamic, and structural analysis of MEL5 TCR binding to A2-ELA. The data provide a molecular basis for biased TCR gene product selection in the CD8⁺ T-cell response to HLA-A*0201·MART-1-(26–35) and indicate that pMHC antigens can be subject to “innate-like” binding modes within adaptive immune responses.     

��-Defensins in Enteric Innate Immunity: FUNCTIONAL PANETH CELL ��-DEFENSINS IN MOUSE COLONIC LUMEN*

Paneth cells are a secretory epithelial lineage that release dense core granules rich in host defense peptides and proteins from the base of small intestinal crypts. Enteric α-defensins, termed cryptdins (Crps) in mice, are highly abundant in Paneth cell secretions and inherently resistant to proteolysis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that enteric α-defensins of Paneth cell origin persist in a functional state in the mouse large bowel lumen. To test this idea, putative Crps purified from mouse distal colonic lumen were characterized biochemically and assayed in vitro for bactericidal peptide activities. The peptides comigrated with cryptdin control peptides in acid-urea-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, providing identification as putative Crps. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry experiments showed that the molecular masses of the putative α-defensins matched those of the six most abundant known Crps, as well as N-terminally truncated forms of each, and that the peptides contain six Cys residues, consistent with identities as α-defensins. N-terminal sequencing definitively revealed peptides with N termini corresponding to full-length, (des-Leu)-truncated, and (des-Leu-Arg)-truncated N termini of Crps 1–4 and 6. Crps from mouse large bowel lumen were bactericidal in the low micromolar range. Thus, Paneth cell α-defensins secreted into the small intestinal lumen persist as intact and functional forms throughout the intestinal tract, suggesting that the peptides may mediate enteric innate immunity in the colonic lumen, far from their upstream point of secretion in small intestinal crypts.Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)² are released by epithelial cells onto mucosal surfaces as effectors of innate immunity (1–5). In mammals, most AMPs derive from two major families, the cathelicidins and defensins (6). The defensins comprise the α-, β-, and θ-defensin subfamilies, which are defined by the presence of six cysteine residues paired in characteristic tridisulfide arrays (7). α-Defensins are highly abundant in two primary cell lineages: phagocytic leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, of myeloid origin and Paneth cells, which are secretory epithelial cells located at the base of the crypts of Lieberkühn in the small intestine (8–10). Neutrophil α-defensins are stored in azurophilic granules and contribute to non-oxidative microbial cell killing in phagolysosomes (11, 12), except in mice whose neutrophils lack defensins (13). In the small bowel, α-defensins and other host defense proteins (14–18) are released apically as components of Paneth cell secretory granules in response to cholinergic stimulation and after exposure to bacterial antigens (19). Therefore, the release of Paneth cell products into the crypt lumen is inferred to protect mitotically active crypt cells from colonization by potential pathogens and confer protection against enteric infection (7, 20, 21).Under normal, homeostatic conditions, Paneth cells are not found outside the small bowel, although they may appear ectopically in response to local inflammation throughout the gastrointestinal tract (22, 23). Paneth cell numbers increase progressively throughout the small intestine, occurring at highest numbers in the distal ileum (24). Mouse Paneth cells express numerous α-defensin isoforms, termed cryptdins (Crps) (25), that have broad spectrum antimicrobial activities (6, 26). Collectively, α-defensins constitute approximately seventy percent of the bactericidal peptide activity in mouse Paneth cell secretions (19), selectively killing bacteria by membrane-disruptive mechanisms (27–30). The role of Paneth cell α-defensins in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity is evident from studies of mice transgenic for human enteric α-defensin-5, HD-5, which are immune to infection by orally administered Salmonella enterica sv. typhimurium (S. typhimurium) (31).The biosynthesis of mature, bactericidal α-defensins from their inactive precursors requires activation by lineage-specific proteolytic convertases. In mouse Paneth cells, inactive ∼8.4-kDa Crp precursors are processed intracellularly into microbicidal ∼4-kDa Crps by specific cleavage events mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) (32, 33). MMP-7 null mice exhibit increased susceptibility to systemic S. typhimurium infection and decreased clearance of orally administered non-invasive Escherichia coli (19, 32). Although the α-defensin proregions are sensitive to proteolysis, the mature, disulfide-stabilized peptides resist digestion by their converting enzymes in vitro, whether the convertase is MMP-7 (32), trypsin (34), or neutrophil serine proteinases (35). Because α-defensins resist proteolysis in vitro, we hypothesized that Paneth cell α-defensins resist degradation and remain in a functional state in the large bowel, a complex, hostile environment containing varied proteases of both host and microbial origin.Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of a population of enteric α-defensins from the mouse colonic lumen. Full-length and N-terminally truncated Paneth cell α-defensins were identified and are abundant in the distal large bowel lumen.     

Biochemical Characterization and Function of Complexes Formed by Hyaluronan and the Heavy Chains of Inter-��-inhibitor (HC��HA) Purified from Extracts of Human Amniotic Membrane

Clinically, amniotic membrane (AM) suppresses inflammation, scarring, and angiogenesis. AM contains abundant hyaluronan (HA) but its function in exerting these therapeutic actions remains unclear. Herein, AM was extracted sequentially with buffers A, B, and C, or separately by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) alone. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that high molecular weight (HMW) HA (an average of ∼3000 kDa) was predominantly extracted in isotonic Extract A (70.1 ± 6.0%) and PBS (37.7 ± 3.2%). Western blot analysis of these extracts with hyaluronidase digestion or NaOH treatment revealed that HMW HA was covalently linked with the heavy chains (HCs) of inter-α-inhibitor (IαI) via a NaOH-sensitive bond, likely transferred by the tumor necrosis factor-α stimulated gene-6 protein (TSG-6). This HC·HA complex (nHC·HA) could be purified from Extract PBS by two rounds of CsCl/guanidine HCl ultracentrifugation as well as in vitro reconstituted (rcHC·HA) by mixing HMW HA, serum IαI, and recombinant TSG-6. Consistent with previous reports, Extract PBS suppressed transforming growth factor-β1 promoter activation in corneal fibroblasts and induced mac ro phage apo pto sis. However, these effects were abolished by hyaluronidase digestion or heat treatment. More importantly, the effects were retained in the nHC·HA or rcHC·HA. These data collectively suggest that the HC·HA complex is the active component in AM responsible in part for clinically observed anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring actions.Hyaluronan (HA)⁴ is widely distributed in extracellular matrices, tissues, body fluids, and even in intracellular compartments (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). The molecular weight of HA ranges from 200 to 10,000 kDa depending on the source (3), but can also exist as smaller fragments and oligosaccharides under certain physiological or pathological conditions (1). Investigations over the last 15 years have suggested that low M_r HA can induce the gene expression of proinflammatory mediators and proangiogenesis, whereas high molecular weight (HMW) HA inhibits these processes (4–7).Several proteins have been shown to bind to HA (8) such as aggrecan (9), cartilage link protein (10), versican (11), CD44 (12, 13), inter-α-inhibitor (IαI) (14, 15), and tumor necrosis factor-α stimulated gene-6 protein (TSG-6) (16, 17). IαI consists of two heavy chains (HCs) (HC1 and HC2), both of which are linked through ester bonds to a chondroitin sulfate chain that is attached to the light chain, i.e. bikunin. Among all HA-binding proteins, only the HCs of IαI have been clearly demonstrated to be covalently coupled to HA (14, 18). However, TSG-6 has also been reported to form stable, possibly covalent, complexes with HA, either alone (19, 20) or when associated with HC (21).The formation of covalent bonds between HCs and HA is mediated by TSG-6 (22–24) where its expression is often induced by inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1 (25, 26). TSG-6 is also expressed in inflammatory-like processes, such as ovulation (21, 27, 28) and cervical ripening (29). TSG-6 interacts with both HA (17) and IαI (21, 24, 30–33), and is essential for covalently transferring HCs on to HA (22–24). The TSG-6-mediated formation of the HC·HA complex has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in female fertility in mice. The HC·HA complex is an integral part of an expanded extracellular “cumulus” matrix around the oocyte, which plays a critical role in successful ovulation and fertilization in vivo (22, 34). HC·HA complexes have also been found at sites of inflammation (35–38) where its pro- or anti-inflammatory role remain arguable (39, 40).Immunostaining reveals abundant HA in the avascular stromal matrix of the AM (41, 42).⁵ In ophthalmology, cryopreserved AM has been widely used as a surgical graft for ocular surface reconstruction and exerts clinically observable actions to promote epithelial wound healing and to suppress inflammation, scarring, and angiogenesis (for reviews see Refs. 43–45). However, it is not clear whether HA in AM forms HC·HA complex, and if so whether such an HC·HA complex exerts any of the above therapeutic actions. To address these questions, we extracted AM with buffers of increasing salt concentration. Because HMW HA was found to form the HC·HA complex and was mainly extractable by isotonic solutions, we further purified it from the isotonic AM extract and reconstituted it in vitro from three defined components, i.e. HMW HA, serum IαI, and recombinant TSG-6. Our results showed that the HC·HA complex is an active component in AM responsible for the suppression of TGF-β1 promoter activity, linkable to the scarring process noted before by AM (46–48) and by the AM soluble extract (49), as well as for the promotion of macrophage death, linkable to the inflammatory process noted by AM (50) and the AM soluble extract (51).     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Repeated Domains of Leptospira Immunoglobulin-like Proteins Interact with Elastin and Tropoelastin

Leptospira spp., the causative agents of leptospirosis, adhere to components of the extracellular matrix, a pivotal role for colonization of host tissues during infection. Previously, we and others have shown that Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins (Lig) of Leptospira spp. bind to fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and fibrinogen. In this study, we report that Leptospira can be immobilized by human tropoelastin (HTE) or elastin from different tissues, including lung, skin, and blood vessels, and that Lig proteins can bind to HTE or elastin. Moreover, both elastin and HTE bind to the same LigB immunoglobulin-like domains, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12 as demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and competition ELISAs. The LigB immunoglobulin-like domain binds to the 17th to 27th exons of HTE (17–27HTE) as determined by ELISA (LigBCon4, K_D = 0.50 μm; LigBCen7′–8, K_D = 0.82 μm; LigBCen9, K_D = 1.54 μm; and LigBCen12, K_D = 0.73 μm). The interaction of LigBCon4 and 17–27HTE was further confirmed by steady state fluorescence spectroscopy (K_D = 0.49 μm) and ITC (K_D = 0.54 μm). Furthermore, the binding was enthalpy-driven and affected by environmental pH, indicating it is a charge-charge interaction. The binding affinity of LigBCon4D341N to 17–27HTE was 4.6-fold less than that of wild type LigBCon4. In summary, we show that Lig proteins of Leptospira spp. interact with elastin and HTE, and we conclude this interaction may contribute to Leptospira adhesion to host tissues during infection.Pathogenic Leptospira spp. are spirochetes that cause leptospirosis, a serious infectious disease of people and animals (1, 2). Weil syndrome, the severe form of leptospiral infection, leads to multiorgan damage, including liver failure (jaundice), renal failure (nephritis), pulmonary hemorrhage, meningitis, abortion, and uveitis (3, 4). Furthermore, this disease is not only prevalent in many developing countries, it is reemerging in the United States (3). Although leptospirosis is a serious worldwide zoonotic disease, the pathogenic mechanisms of Leptospira infection remain enigmatic. Recent breakthroughs in applying genetic tools to Leptospira may facilitate studies on the molecular pathogenesis of leptospirosis (5–8).The attachment of pathogenic Leptospira spp. to host tissues is critical in the early phase of Leptospira infection. Leptospira spp. adhere to host tissues to overcome mechanical defense systems at tissue surfaces and to initiate colonization of specific tissues, such as the lung, kidney, and liver. Leptospira invade hosts tissues through mucous membranes or injured epidermis, coming in contact with subepithelial tissues. Here, certain bacterial outer surface proteins serve as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)² to mediate the binding of bacteria to different extracellular matrices (ECMs) of host cells (9). Several leptospiral MSCRAMMs have been identified (10–18), and we speculate that more will be identified in the near future.Lig proteins are distributed on the outer surface of pathogenic Leptospira, and the expression of Lig protein is only found in low passage strains (14, 16, 17), probably induced by environmental cues such as osmotic or temperature changes (19). Lig proteins can bind to fibrinogen and a variety of ECMs, including fibronectin (Fn), laminin, and collagen, thereby mediating adhesion to host cells (20–23). Lig proteins also constitute good vaccine candidates (24–26).Elastin is a component of ECM critical to tissue elasticity and resilience and is abundant in skin, lung, blood vessels, placenta, uterus, and other tissues (27–29). Tropoelastin is the soluble precursor of elastin (28). During the major phase of elastogenesis, multiple tropoelastin molecules associate through coacervation (30–32). Because of the abundance of elastin or tropoelastin on the surface of host cells, several bacterial MSCRAMMs use elastin and/or tropoelastin to mediate adhesion during the infection process (33–35).Because leptospiral infection is known to cause severe pulmonary hemorrhage (36, 37) and abortion (38), we hypothesize that some leptospiral MSCRAMMs may interact with elastin and/or tropoelastin in these elastin-rich tissues. This is the first report that Lig proteins of Leptospira interact with elastin and tropoelastin, and the interactions are mediated by several specific immunoglobulin-like domains of Lig proteins, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12, which bind to the 17th to 27th exons of human tropoelastin (HTE).