Identification of Direct Tyrosine Kinase Substrates Based on Protein Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics

Protein kinases are implicated in multiple diseases such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and central nervous system disorders. Identification of kinase substrates is critical to dissecting signaling pathways and to understanding disease pathologies. However, methods and techniques used to identify bona fide kinase substrates have remained elusive. Here we describe a proteomic strategy suitable for identifying kinase specificity and direct substrates in high throughput. This approach includes an in vitro kinase assay-based substrate screening and an endogenous kinase dependent phosphorylation profiling. In the in vitro kinase reaction route, a pool of formerly phosphorylated proteins is directly extracted from whole cell extracts, dephosphorylated by phosphatase treatment, after which the kinase of interest is added. Quantitative proteomics identifies the rephosphorylated proteins as direct substrates in vitro. In parallel, the in vivo quantitative phosphoproteomics is performed in which cells are treated with or without the kinase inhibitor. Together, proteins phosphorylated in vitro overlapping with the kinase-dependent phosphoproteome in vivo represents the physiological direct substrates in high confidence. The protein kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics was applied to identify 25 candidate substrates of the protein-tyrosine kinase SYK, including a number of known substrates and many novel substrates in human B cells. These shed light on possible new roles for SYK in multiple important signaling pathways. The results demonstrate that this integrated proteomic approach can provide an efficient strategy to screen direct substrates for protein tyrosine kinases.Protein phosphorylation plays a pivotal role in regulating biological events such as protein–protein interactions, signal transduction, subcellular localization, and apoptosis (1). Deregulation of kinase-substrate interactions often leads to disease states such as human malignancies, diabetes, and immune disorders (2). Although a number of kinases are being targeted to develop new drugs, our understanding of the precise relationships between protein kinases and their direct substrates is incomplete for the majority of protein kinases (3). Thus, mapping kinase–substrate relationships is essential for the understanding of biological signaling networks and the discovery and development of drugs for targeted therapies (4). Toward this goal, various in vitro kinase assays using synthetic peptide libraries (5), phage expression libraries (6), protein arrays (7–9), or cell extracts (10, 11) have been explored for the screening of kinase substrates.Besides classical biochemical and genetic methods, mass spectrometry-based high throughput approaches have become increasingly attractive because they are capable of sequencing proteins and localizing phosphorylation sites at the same time. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic methods have been extensively applied to kinase-substrate interaction mapping (12) and global phosphorylation profiling (13–15). Although thousands of phosphorylation events can be inspected simultaneously (16, 17), large-scale phosphoproteomics does not typically reveal direct relationships between protein kinases and their substrates.Recently, several mass spectrometry-based proteomic strategies have been introduced for identifying elusive kinase substrates (7, 18, 19). Taking advantage of recent advances of high speed and high-resolution mass spectrometry, these methods used purified, active kinases to phosphorylate cell extracts in vitro, followed by mass spectrometric analysis to identify phosphoproteins. These approaches commonly face the major challenge of distinguishing phosphorylation events triggered by the kinase reaction from background signals introduced by endogenous kinase activities (20). To dissect the phosphorylation cascade, Shokat and colleagues developed an approach named Analog-Sensitive Kinase Allele (ASKA)¹ (21). In their approach, a kinase is engineered to accept a bulky-ATP analog exclusively so that direct phosphorylation caused by the analog-sensitive target kinase can be differentiated from that of wild type kinases. As a result, indirect effects caused by contaminating kinases during the in vitro kinase assay are largely eliminated. ASKA has recently been coupled with quantitative proteomics, termed Quantitative Identification of Kinase Substrates (QIKS) (12), to identify substrate proteins of Mek1. Recently, one extension of the ASKA technique is for the analog ATP to carry a γ-thiophosphate group so that in vitro thiophosphorylated proteins can be isolated for mass spectrometric detection (22–24). In addition to ASKA, radioisotope labeling using [γ-³²P]ATP (10), using concentrated purified kinase (25), inactivating endogenous kinase activity by an additional heating step (11), and quantitative proteomics (26, 27) are alternative means aimed to address the same issues. All of these methods, however, have been limited to the identification of in vitro kinase substrates.To bridge the gap between in vitro phosphorylation and physiological phosphorylation events, we have recently introduced an integrated strategy termed Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (KALIP) (28). By combining in vitro kinase assays with in vivo phosphoproteomics, this method was demonstrated to have exceptional sensitivity for high confidence identification of direct kinase substrates. The main drawback for the KALIP approach is that the kinase reaction is performed at the peptide stage to eliminate any problems related to contamination by endogenous kinases. However, the KALIP method may not be effective for kinases that require a priming phosphorylation event (i.e. a previous phosphorylation, on substrate or kinase, has effect on following phosphorylation) (29), additional interacting surfaces (30), or a docking site on the protein (31). For example, basophilic kinases require multiple basic resides for phosphorylation and tryptic digestion will abolish these motifs, which are needed for effective kinase reactions.We address the shortcoming by introducing an alternative strategy termed Protein Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (proKALIP). The major difference between this method and the previous KALIP method is the utilization of protein extracts instead of digested peptides as the substrate pool. The major issue is how to reduce potential interference by endogenous kinase activities. One effective solution is to use a generic kinase inhibitor, 5′-(4-fluorosulfonylbenzoyl)adenosine (FSBA), which was widely used for covalent labeling of kinases (32, 33), kinase isolation (34), kinase activity exploration (35, 36), and more recently kinase substrate identification by Kothary and co-workers (37). However, an extra step is required to effectively remove the inhibitor before the kinase reaction, which may decrease the sensitivity. ProKALIP addresses the issue by carrying out the kinase reaction using formerly in vivo phosphorylated proteins as candidates. This step efficiently improves the sensitivity and specificity of the in vitro kinase reaction. Coupled with in vivo phosphoproteomics, proKALIP has gained a high sensitivity and provided physiologically relevant substrates with high confidence.To demonstrate the proKALIP strategy, the protein-tyrosine kinase SYK was used as our target kinase. SYK is known to play a crucial role in the adaptive immune response, particularly in B cells, by facilitating the antigen induced B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways and modulating cellular responses to oxidative stress in a receptor-independent manner (38, 39). SYK also has diverse biological functions such as innate immune recognition, osteoclast maturation, cellular adhesion, platelet activation, and vascular development (38). In addition, the expression of SYK is highly correlated to tumorigenesis by promoting cell–cell adhesion and inhibiting the motility, growth, and invasiveness of certain cancer cells (40). In this study, we attempt to identify bona fide substrates of SYK in human B cells using the proKALIP approach and demonstrate the specificity and sensitivity of this strategy.     

Identification of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1 (ERK1) Direct Substrates using Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics

Kinase mediated phosphorylation signaling is extensively involved in cellular functions and human diseases, and unraveling phosphorylation networks requires the identification of substrates targeted by kinases, which has remained challenging. We report here a novel proteomic strategy to identify the specificity and direct substrates of kinases by coupling phosphoproteomics with a sensitive stable isotope labeled kinase reaction. A whole cell extract was moderately dephosphorylated and subjected to in vitro kinase reaction under the condition in which ¹⁸O-ATP is the phosphate donor. The phosphorylated proteins are then isolated and identified by mass spectrometry, in which the heavy phosphate (+85.979 Da) labeled phosphopeptides reveal the kinase specificity. The in vitro phosphorylated proteins with heavy phosphates are further overlapped with in vivo kinase-dependent phosphoproteins for the identification of direct substrates with high confidence. The strategy allowed us to identify 46 phosphorylation sites on 38 direct substrates of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1, including multiple known substrates and novel substrates, highlighting the ability of this high throughput method for direct kinase substrate screening.Protein phosphorylation regulates almost all aspects of cell life, such as cell cycle, migration, and apoptosis (1), and deregulation of protein phosphorylation is one of the most frequent causes or consequences of human diseases including cancers, diabetes, and immune disorders (2). Up till now, however, known substrates are far from saturation for the majority of protein kinases (3); thus, mapping comprehensive kinase-substrate relationships is essential to understanding biological mechanisms and uncovering new drug targets (4).Accompanied with advances of high-speed and high-resolution mass spectrometry, the technique of kinase substrate screening using proteomic strategy is quickly evolving (5–7). Mass spectrometry has been extensively used for kinase-substrate interaction mapping (8) and global phosphorylation profiling (9). Although thousands of phosphorylation sites have been detected, complex phosphorylation cascade and crosstalk between pathways make it difficult for large-scale phosphoproteomics to reveal direct relationships between protein kinases and their substrates (10, 11). Extensive statistics, bioinformatics, and downstream biochemical assays are mandatory for the substrate verification (12, 13). Another strategy uses purified, active kinases to phosphorylate cell extracts in vitro, followed by mass spectrometric analysis to identify phosphoproteins. This approach inevitably faces the major challenge of separating real sites phosphorylated by target kinase and the phosphorylation triggered by endogenous kinases from cell lysates (14). Analog-sensitive kinase allele (15) overcomes the issue by utilizing the engineered kinase that can exclusively take a bulky-ATP analog under the reaction condition. Analog-sensitive kinase allele has been coupled with γ-thiophosphate analog ATP to facilitate the mass spectrometric analysis (16–18).We have introduced kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics (KALIP)¹ to link the in vitro substrate identification and physiological phosphorylation events together in a high throughput manner (19, 20). The strategy, however, has only been applied to identify direct substrates of tyrosine kinases. In this study, we expanded the application of KALIP to serine/threonine kinases by introducing a quantitative strategy termed Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (siKALIP). The method was applied to identify direct substrates of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1), a serine/threonine kinase acting as an essential component of the Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway (21). A defect in the MAP/ERK pathway causes uncontrolled growth, which likely leads to cancer (22) and other diseases (23–25). ERK1 can be activated by growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and nerve growth factor (NGF) (26). Upon stimulation, ERK1 phosphorylates hundreds of substrates in various cellular compartments including cytoplasm, nucleus, and membrane (27). Among 38 ERK1 direct substrates identified by siKALIP, more than one third are previously discovered by classical molecular biology approaches, highlighting high specificity and sensitivity of the strategy. The results also support the hypothesis that ERK1 plays complex roles in multiple pathways that are essential for the cell growth regulation.     

The Kinase Activity of Rip2 Determines Its Stability and Consequently Nod1- and Nod2-mediated Immune Responses

Rip2 (RICK, CARD3) has been identified as a key effector molecule downstream of the pattern recognition receptors, Nod1 and Nod2; however, its mechanism of action remains to be elucidated. In particular, it is unclear whether its kinase activity is required for signaling or for maintaining protein stability. We have investigated the expression level of different retrovirally expressed kinase-dead Rip2 mutants and the role of Rip2 kinase activity in the signaling events that follow Nod1 and Nod2 stimulation. We show that in primary cells expressing kinase-inactive Rip2, protein levels were severely compromised, and stability could not be reconstituted by the addition of a phospho-mimetic mutation in its autophosphorylation site. Consequently, inflammatory cytokine production in response to Nod1 and Nod2 ligands was abrogated both in vitro and in vivo in the absence of Rip2 kinase activity. Our results highlight the central role that Rip2 kinase activity plays in conferring stability to the protein and thus in the preservation of Nod1- and Nod2-mediated innate immune responses.A key step in the initiation of effector immune responses is the recognition of highly conserved molecules expressed by microbial pathogens. The immune system has developed specific receptors that sense these so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns and initiate appropriate immune responses. One key family of pattern recognition receptors is the Nod-like receptor (NLR)² family (1–3), of which two members, Nod1 and Nod2, have been implicated in the recognition of bacterial peptidoglycan derivatives released into the cytosol upon bacterial infection (4–6). Several studies have shown that Nod1 plays a role in host defense against invasive pathogens such as Helicobacter pylori and Escherichia coli (7, 8), and Nod2 mutations have been associated with a higher incidence of Crohn disease (9, 10), thus highlighting these NLRs as important regulators of inflammatory immune responses.Rip2, also called CARD3, RICK, or CARDIAK, is a serine/threonine kinase, which was implicated in the induction of NF-κB activation and apoptosis (11–13). Rip2 has been described to be critical for responses against Toll-like receptor ligands such as LPS (14, 15), although findings from recent studies did not support this conclusion (16). Rip2 contains a caspase-recruitment domain (CARD), which mediates interaction with other CARD-containing proteins such as Nod1 and Nod2, in addition to an N-terminal kinase domain and an intermediate domain. Nod1 and Nod2 associate with Rip2 upon peptidoglycan ligation (17) leading to downstream signaling events that culminate in NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation (15, 18–20). Recent reports have suggested that the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase family member TAK1 provides the link between Rip2 and NF-κB activation upon Nod1 and Nod2 stimulation (21–23). However, the exact role of Rip2 and in particular its kinase activity in mediating downstream effector activation in NLR signaling still remains unclear. Notably, in vitro investigations have suggested that Rip2 kinase activity may be dispensable for the induction of immune responses initiated by NLR-ligands (21, 24, 25) and that disruption of Rip2 kinase activity is associated with a loss in protein stability (23); however, such studies utilized protein overexpression in cell lines and are yet to be tested in primary cells or in vivo.In the current investigation we sought to elucidate the role of Rip2 kinase activity in transducing inflammatory signals upon NLR stimulation in vitro and in vivo. To this end, we utilized both Rip2 knock-out (15) and Rip2 kinase-dead knock-in mice (24) in addition to Rip2 deficient primary cells that were retrovirally reconstituted with different kinase-inactive mutants. We show here that in the absence of intact kinase activity, Rip2 protein is not stable and that insertion of a phospho-mimetic mutation is not sufficient to restore stability. Moreover, pharmacological abrogation of Rip2 kinase activity in primary cells similarly leads to destabilization of the molecule. As a consequence, signaling downstream of Nod1 and Nod2 and inflammatory cytokine production is impaired both in vivo and in vitro. Our results highlight Rip2 kinase activity as a central regulator of protein stability and consequently innate immune responses triggered by Nod1 and Nod2 ligands.     

Identification of Galacturonic Acid-1-phosphate Kinase, a New Member of the GHMP Kinase Superfamily in Plants, and Comparison with Galactose-1-phosphate Kinase

The process of salvaging sugars released from extracellular matrix, during plant cell growth and development, is not well understood, and many molecular components remain to be identified. Here we identify and functionally characterize a unique Arabidopsis gene encoding an α-d-galacturonic acid-1-phosphate kinase (GalAK) and compare it with galactokinase. The GalAK gene appeared to be expressed in all tissues implicating that glycose salvage is a common catabolic pathway. GalAK catalyzes the ATP-dependent conversion of α-d-galacturonic acid (d-GalA) to α-d-galacturonic acid-1-phosphate (GalA-1-P). This sugar phosphate is then converted to UDP-GalA by a UDP-sugar pyrophosphorylase as determined by a real-time ¹H NMR-based assay. GalAK is a distinct member of the GHMP kinase family that includes galactokinase (G), homoserine kinase (H), mevalonate kinase (M), and phosphomevalonate kinase (P). Although these kinases have conserved motifs for sugar binding, nucleotide binding, and catalysis, they do have subtle difference. For example, GalAK has an additional domain near the sugar-binding motif. Using site-directed mutagenesis we established that mutation in A368S reduces phosphorylation activity by 40%; A41E mutation completely abolishes GalAK activity; Y250F alters sugar specificity and allows phosphorylation of d-glucuronic acid, the 4-epimer of GalA. Unlike many plant genes that undergo duplication, GalAK occurs as a single copy gene in vascular plants. We suggest that GalAK generates GalA-1-P from the salvaged GalA that is released during growth-dependent cell wall restructuring, or from storage tissue. The GalA-1-P itself is then available for use in the formation of UDP-GalA required for glycan synthesis.d-Galacturonic acid (d-GalA)³ is a quantitatively major glycose present in numerous plant polysaccharides including pectins and arabinogalactan proteins (1, 2). The synthesis of these polysaccharides requires a large number of glycosyltransferases and diverse nucleotide-sugar (NDP-sugar) donors (1, 3). Some of these NDP-sugars are formed by interconversion of pre-existing NDP-sugars and by salvage pathways. For example, the main pathway for UDP-GalA formation is the 4-epimerization of UDP-GlcA, a reaction catalyzed by UDP-GlcA 4-epimerase (4–6). However, in ripening Fragaria fruit d-GalA is incorporated into pectin (7). It is likely that a sugar kinase converts the d-GalA to GalA-1-P (8), which is then converted to UDP-GalA by a nonspecific UDP-sugar pyrophosphorylase (9). Myo-inositol may also be a source of GalA for polysaccharide biosynthesis (10).Galacturonic acid is likely to be generated by enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of pectic polysaccharides in plant tissues. Polysaccharide hydrolase activities are present in germinating seeds (11, 12), in germinating and elongating pollen (13–15), and in ripening fruit (14). Thus, monosaccharide salvage pathways may be required for normal plant growth and development.Numerous sugar-1-P kinases, including d-Gal-1-P kinase (16), l-Ara-1-P kinase (17), and l-Fuc-1-P kinase (18), have been described (19), but no d-GalA-1-P kinase has been identified in any species to account for the hydrolysis and recycle of pectic polymers. The subsequent pyrophosphorylation of UDP-sugars could be carried out by UDP-sugar pyrophosphorylases (20).Here, we report the identification and characterization of a functional galacturonic acid kinase (GalAK). We compared the activity of GalAK with a previously uncharacterized Arabidopsis GalK and discussed the evolution of these sugar kinase members of the GHMP kinase.     

Sgt1 Dimerization Is Negatively Regulated by Protein Kinase CK2-mediated Phosphorylation at Ser361

The kinetochore, which consists of centromere DNA and structural proteins, is essential for proper chromosome segregation in eukaryotes. In budding yeast, Sgt1 and Hsp90 are required for the binding of Skp1 to Ctf13 (a component of the core kinetochore complex CBF3) and therefore for the assembly of CBF3. We have previously shown that Sgt1 dimerization is important for this kinetochore assembly mechanism. In this study, we report that protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates Ser³⁶¹ on Sgt1, and this phosphorylation inhibits Sgt1 dimerization.The kinetochore is a structural protein complex located in the centromeric region of the chromosome coupled to spindle microtubules (1, 2). The kinetochore generates a signal to arrest cells during mitosis when it is not properly attached to microtubules, thereby preventing chromosome missegregation, which can lead to aneuploidy (3, 4). The molecular structure of the kinetochore complex of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been well characterized; it is composed of more than 70 proteins, many of which are conserved in mammals (2).The centromere DNA in the budding yeast is a 125-bp region that contains three conserved regions, CDEI, CDEII, and CDEIII (5, 6). CDEIII (25 bp) is essential for centromere function (7) and is bound to a key component of the centromere, the CBF3 complex. The CBF3 complex contains four proteins, Ndc10, Cep3, Ctf13 (8–15), and Skp1 (14, 15), all essential for viability. Mutations in any of the CBF3 proteins abolish the ability of CDEIII to bind to CBF3 (16, 17). All of the kinetochore proteins, except the CDEI-binding Cbf1 (18–20), localize to the kinetochores in a CBF3-dependent manner (2). Thus, CBF3 is a fundamental kinetochore complex, and its mechanism of assembly is of great interest.We have previously found that Sgt1 and Skp1 activate Ctf13; thus, they are required for assembly of the CBF3 complex (21). The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is also required to form the active Ctf13-Skp1 complex (22). Sgt1 has two highly conserved motifs that are required for protein-protein interaction: the tetratricopeptide repeat (21) and the CHORD protein and Sgt1-specific motif. We and others have found that both domains are important for the interaction of Sgt1 with Hsp90 (23–26), which is required for assembly of the core kinetochore complex. This interaction is an initial step in kinetochore activation (24, 26, 27), which is conserved between yeast and humans (28, 29).We have recently shown that Sgt1 dimerization is important for Sgt1-Skp1 binding and therefore for kinetochore assembly (30). In this study, we have found that protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates Sgt1 at Ser³⁶¹, and this phosphorylation inhibits Sgt1 dimerization. Therefore, CK2 appears to regulate kinetochore assembly negatively in budding yeast.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Growth Factor Receptor-bound Protein-7 by Focal Adhesion Kinase in the Regulation of Cell Migration, Proliferation, and Tumorigenesis

We have previously reported that growth factor receptor-bound protein-7 (Grb7), an Src-homology 2 (SH2)-containing adaptor protein, enables interaction with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to regulate cell migration in response to integrin activation. To further elucidate the signaling events mediated by FAK·Grb7 complexes in promoting cell migration and other cellular functions, we firstly examined the phos pho ryl a ted tyrosine site(s) of Grb7 by FAK using an in vivo mutagenesis. We found that FAK was capable of phos pho rylating at least 2 of 12 tyrosine residues within Grb7, Tyr-188 and Tyr-338. Moreover, mutations converting the identified Tyr to Phe inhibited integrin-dependent cell migration as well as impaired cell proliferation but not survival compared with the wild-type control. Interestingly, the above inhibitory effects caused by the tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants are probably attributed to their down-regulation of phospho-Tyr-397 of FAK, thereby implying a mechanism by competing with wild-type Grb7 for binding to FAK. Consequently, these tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants evidently altered the phospho-Tyr-118 of paxillin and phos pho ryl a tion of ERK1/2 but less on phospho-Ser-473 of AKT, implying their involvement in the FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions. Additionally, we also illustrated that the formation of FAK·Grb7 complexes and Grb7 phos pho ryl a tion by FAK in an integrin-dependent manner were essential for cell migration, proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in A431 epidermal carcinoma cells, indicating the importance of FAK·Grb7 complexes in tumorigenesis. Our data provide a better understanding on the signal transduction event for FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions as well as to shed light on a potential therapeutic in cancers.Growth factor receptor bound protein-7 (Grb7)² is initially identified as a SH2 domain-containing adaptor protein bound to the activated EGF receptor (1). Grb7 is composed of an N-terminal proline-rich region, following a putative RA (Ras-associating) domain and a central PH (pleckstrin homology) domain and a BPS motif (between PH and SH2 domains), and a C-terminal SH2 domain (2–6). Despite the lack of enzymatic activity, the presence of multiple protein-protein interaction domains allows Grb7 family adaptor proteins to participate in versatile signal transduction pathways and, therefore, to regulate many cellular functions (4–6). A number of signaling molecules has been reported to interact with these featured domains, although most of the identified Grb7 binding partners are mediated through its SH2 domain. For example, the SH2 domain of Grb7 has been demonstrated to be capable of binding to the phospho-tyrosine sites of EGF receptor (1), ErbB2 (7), ErbB3 and ErbB4 (8), Ret (9), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (10), insulin receptor (11), SHPTP2 (12), Tek/Tie2 (13), caveolin (14), c-Kit (15), EphB1 (16), G6f immunoreceptor protein (17), Rnd1 (18), Shc (7), FAK (19), and so on. The proceeding α-helix of the PH domain of Grb7 is the calmodulin-binding domain responsible for recruiting Grb7 to plasma membrane in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner (20), and the association between the PH domain of Grb7 and phosphoinositides is required for the phosphorylation by FAK (21). Two additional proteins, NIK (nuclear factor κB-inducing kinase) and FHL2 (four and half lim domains isoform 2), in association with the GM region (Grb and Mig homology region) of Grb7 are also reported, although the physiological functions for these interactions remain unknown (22, 23). Recently, other novel roles in translational controls and stress responses through the N terminus of Grb7 are implicated for the findings of Grb7 interacting with the 5′-untranslated region of capped targeted KOR (kappa opioid receptor) mRNA and the Hu antigen R of stress granules in an FAK-mediated phosphorylation manner (24, 25).Unlike its member proteins Grb10 and Grb14, the role of Grb7 in cell migration is unambiguous and well documented. This is supported by a series of studies. Firstly, Grb7 family members share a significantly conserved molecular architecture with the Caenorhabditis elegans Mig-10 protein, which is involved in neuronal cell migration during embryonic development (4, 5, 26), suggesting that Grb7 may play a role in cell migration. Moreover, Grb7 is often co-amplified with Her2/ErbB2 in certain human cancers and tumor cell lines (7, 27, 28), and its overexpression resulted in invasive and metastatic consequences of various cancers and tumor cells (23, 29–33). On the contrary, knocking down Grb7 by RNA interference conferred to an inhibitory outcome of the breast cancer motility (34). Furthermore, interaction of Grb7 with autophosphorylated FAK at Tyr-397 could promote integrin-mediated cell migration in NIH 3T3 and CHO cells, whereas overexpression of its SH2 domain, an dominant negative mutant of Grb7, inhibited cell migration (19, 35). Recruitment and phosphorylation of Grb7 by EphB1 receptors enhanced cell migration in an ephrin-dependent manner (16). Recently, G7–18NATE, a selective Grb7-SH2 domain affinity cyclic peptide, was demonstrated to efficiently block cell migration of tumor cells (32, 36). In addition to cell migration, Grb7 has been shown to play a role in a variety of physiological and pathological events, for instance, kidney development (37), tumorigenesis (7, 14, 38–41), angiogenic activity (20), proliferation (34, 42, 43), anti-apoptosis (44), gene expression regulation (24), Silver-Russell syndrome (45), rheumatoid arthritis (46), atopic dermatitis (47), and T-cell activation (17, 48). Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown regarding the downstream signaling events of Grb7-mediated various functions. In particular, given the role of Grb7 as an adaptor molecule and its SH2 domain mainly interacting with upstream regulators, it will be interesting to identify potential downstream effectors through interacting with the functional GM region or N-terminal proline-rich region.In this report, we identified two tyrosine phosphorylated sites of Grb7 by FAK and deciphered the signaling targets downstream through these phosphorylated tyrosine sites to regulate various cellular functions such as cell migration, proliferation, and survival. In addition, our study sheds light on tyrosine phosphorylation of Grb7 by FAK involved in tumorigenesis.     

Interrogating cAMP-dependent Kinase Signaling in Jurkat T Cells via a Protein Kinase A Targeted Immune-precipitation Phosphoproteomics Approach

In the past decade, mass-spectrometry-based methods have emerged for the quantitative profiling of dynamic changes in protein phosphorylation, allowing the behavior of thousands of phosphorylation sites to be monitored in a single experiment. However, when one is interested in specific signaling pathways, such shotgun methodologies are not ideal because they lack selectivity and are not cost and time efficient with respect to instrument and data analysis time.Here we evaluate and explore a peptide-centric antibody generated to selectively enrich peptides containing the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) consensus motif. This targeted phosphoproteomic strategy is used to profile temporal quantitative changes of potential PKA substrates in Jurkat T lymphocytes upon prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) stimulation, which increases intracellular cAMP, activating PKA. Our method combines ultra-high-specificity motif-based immunoaffinity purification with cost-efficient stable isotope dimethyl labeling. We identified 655 phosphopeptides, of which 642 (i.e. 98%) contained the consensus motif [R/K][R/K/X]X[pS/pT]. When our data were compared with a large-scale Jurkat T-lymphocyte phosphoproteomics dataset containing more than 10,500 phosphosites, a minimal overlap of 0.2% was observed. This stresses the need for such targeted analyses when the interest is in a particular kinase.Our data provide a resource of likely substrates of PKA, and potentially some substrates of closely related kinases. Network analysis revealed that about half of the observed substrates have been implicated in cAMP-induced signaling. Still, the other half of the here-identified substrates have been less well characterized, representing a valuable resource for future research.The identification and quantification of protein phosphorylation under system perturbations is an integral part of systems biology (1, 2). The combination of phosphopeptide enrichment (3–6), stable isotope labeling, and high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) methods (7–9) has become the method of choice for the identification of novel phosphorylation sites and for the quantitation of temporal dynamics within signaling networks (10, 11), allowing the behavior of thousands of phosphorylation sites to be studied in a single experiment (10, 12, 13). Nowadays, one of the most commonly adopted high-throughput phosphoproteomics strategies utilizes two consecutive separation steps: (i) an initial fractionation to reduce the sample complexity, and (ii) a phosphopeptide-specific affinity purification. Such techniques include strong cation exchange fractionation under acidic conditions (3), followed by a chelation-based method with the use of metal ions (i.e. immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (4), metal oxide affinity chromatography (10, 14), or Ti⁴⁺ immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (6)). Alternatives to strong cation exchange for the first sample fractionation step have also been reported, including the use of electrostatic repulsion liquid chromatography (15, 16), which is well suited for the identification of multiply phosphorylated peptides, or hydrophilic interaction chromatography (17).Although the number of detected phosphorylated peptides is nowadays impressive, these kinds of methodologies are still inclined to identify/quantify the more abundant phosphoproteins present in a sample. For example, phosphotyrosine peptides are underrepresented because of their relatively lower abundance.In order to analyze key signaling events that may occur on less abundant phosphoproteins, more targeted approaches, focused on a specific pathway or a specific post-translational modification, are thus still essential. Studies examining post-translational modifications are often based on immunoaffinity purification at the protein or peptide level using dedicated antibodies. Recent examples include the selective enrichment of acetylated lysines (18) and phosphorylated tyrosines (19, 20). More recently, the first specific methods targeting serine/threonine phosphorylation motifs using immune-affinity assays have emerged (21, 22). The advantages of targeted approaches are their potentially higher sensitivity and more specific throughput with, as a consequence, relatively faster and easier data interpretation, which make them attractive for many systems biology applications.Immunoaffinity enrichment can be applied at both the protein and the peptide level, and both have been explored to study protein tyrosine phosphorylation (23). The first one results mainly in information on total protein phosphorylation levels. The detection of the actual phosphoresidue might be hampered by the high content of unmodified peptides derived from the immune-purified phosphoprotein and its binding partners. Immunoprecipitation at the peptide level (20, 24, 25), in contrast, leads to improved phosphosite characterization, with the identification of hundreds of sites, albeit with the loss (generally) of information regarding total protein expression.To profile the dynamic regulation of phosphorylation events via mass spectrometry, stable isotope labeling is often implemented, either with the use of amino acids in cell culture (10) or via chemical peptide labeling of the proteolytic digests (26, 27). To identify low-abundant signaling events, phosphoprotein/phosphopeptide immunoprecipitation is typically performed on several milligrams of material because of the substoichiometric abundance of post-translational modifications. This may hamper the use of expensive isotope-labeling reagents such as iTRAQ or tandem mass tag reagents, given the large amount of chemicals needed. Boersema et al. (28) introduced an alternative sensitive and accurate triplex labeling approach using inexpensive reagents (i.e. formaldehyde) that is much less limited in terms of the sample type or amount. We combined this latter stable-isotope dimethyl labeling approach (27–29) with highly specific antibodies raised against a set of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) phosphorylated substrates as based on the current literature (11, 30–34). It is generally accepted that PKA phosphorylates sites with the reasonably stringent consensus motif [R/K][R/K/X]X[pS/pT]. It should be noted that this consensus motif resembles somewhat the motifs of other AGC kinases (e.g. Akt, PKG, PKC).The basicity of the PKA motifs may hamper their analysis via MS-based proteomics, especially when trypsin is used as a protease, as the peptides may become too small to be sequenced. The use of trypsin is also unfavorable in the approach presented here when attempting to immunoprecipitate peptides bearing the PKA motif. Therefore, we decided to use Lys-C in order to keep the (dominant (RRX[pS/pT])) phosphorylated motif intact. To enhance identification, we applied decision-tree MS/MS technology (9), which makes use of HCD and ETD for more efficient fragmentation, higher mass accuracy in tandem MS mode, and less background noise (35).We applied this method to screen the response of Jurkat T cells to prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) treatment. PGE₂ is a potent inflammatory mediator that plays an important role in several immune-regulatory actions (36). It is produced by many different cell types, including tumor cells, where carcinogenesis is associated with chronic inflammatory responses (37). PGE₂ signaling in T cells is initiated by its binding to the G protein–coupled receptors EP1, -2, -3, and -4. Signaling pathways that are initiated by PGE₂ are for the most part under control of the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP),¹ which is generated from ATP by adenylyl cyclase when PGE₂ binds to EP2 or EP4 receptors. One of the primary targets of cAMP is PKA—cAMP binding releases the catalytic subunit activating the kinase. In the current study, we efficiently enriched close to 650 phosphopeptides containing the [R/K][R/K/X]X[pS/pT] consensus motif. Almost all these sites were absent in a recently reported comprehensive phosphoproteomics dataset of Jurkat T cells (12), compiled using shotgun strong cation exchange–immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography analysis and containing ∼10,500 phosphorylation sites, illustrative of the complementarity and selectivity of our approach. The qualitative and quantitative data presented here provide a wide-ranging and credible resource of likely PKA substrates. Network analysis confirmed several established cAMP-dependent signaling nodes in our dataset, although most identified potential PKA substrates are “novel” (i.e. not previously reported and/or linked to PKA). Therefore, the dataset presented here can be considered as a comprehensive and reliable resource for future research into cAMP-related signaling.