Interference between Proteins Hap46 and Hop/p60, Which Bind to Different Domains of the Molecular Chaperone hsp70/hsc70

Several structurally divergent proteins associate with molecular chaperones of the 70-kDa heat shock protein (hsp70) family and modulate their activities. We investigated the cofactors Hap46 and Hop/p60 and the effects of their binding to mammalian hsp70 and the cognate form hsc70. Hap46 associates with the amino-terminal ATP binding domain and stimulates ATP binding two- to threefold but inhibits binding of misfolded protein substrate to hsc70 and reactivation of thermally denatured luciferase in an hsc70-dependent refolding system. By contrast, Hop/p60 interacts with a portion of the carboxy-terminal domain of hsp70s, which is distinct from that involved in the binding of misfolded proteins. Thus, Hop/p60 and substrate proteins can form ternary complexes with hsc70. Hop/p60 exerts no effect on ATP and substrate binding but nevertheless interferes with protein refolding. Even though there is no direct interaction between these accessory proteins, Hap46 inhibits the binding of Hop/p60 to hsc70 but Hop/p60 does not inhibit the binding of Hap46 to hsc70. As judged from respective deletions, the amino-terminal portions of Hap46 and Hop/p60 are involved in this interference. These data suggest steric hindrance between Hap46 and Hop/p60 during interaction with distantly located binding sites on hsp70s. Thus, not only do the major domains of hsp70 chaperones communicate with each other, but cofactors interacting with these domains affect each other as well.     

Conserved DNA Motifs,Including the CENP-B Box-like,Are Possible Promoters of Satellite DNA Array Rearrangements in Nematodes

Tandemly arrayed non-coding sequences or satellite DNAs (satDNAs) are rapidly evolving segments of eukaryotic genomes, including the centromere, and may raise a genetic barrier that leads to speciation. However, determinants and mechanisms of satDNA sequence dynamics are only partially understood. Sequence analyses of a library of five satDNAs common to the root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. fallax together with a satDNA, which is specific for M. chitwoodi only revealed low sequence identity (32–64%) among them. However, despite sequence differences, two conserved motifs were recovered. One of them turned out to be highly similar to the CENP-B box of human alpha satDNA, identical in 10–12 out of 17 nucleotides. In addition, organization of nematode satDNAs was comparable to that found in alpha satDNA of human and primates, characterized by monomers concurrently arranged in simple and higher-order repeat (HOR) arrays. In contrast to alpha satDNA, phylogenetic clustering of nematode satDNA monomers extracted either from simple or from HOR array indicated frequent shuffling between these two organizational forms. Comparison of homogeneous simple arrays and complex HORs composed of different satDNAs, enabled, for the first time, the identification of conserved motifs as obligatory components of monomer junctions. This observation highlights the role of short motifs in rearrangements, even among highly divergent sequences. Two mechanisms are proposed to be involved in this process, i.e., putative transposition-related cut-and-paste insertions and/or illegitimate recombination. Possibility for involvement of the nematode CENP-B box-like sequence in the transposition-related mechanism and together with previously established similarity of the human CENP-B protein and pogo-like transposases implicate a novel role of the CENP-B box and related sequence motifs in addition to the known function in centromere protein binding.     

The Role of SurA PPIase Domains in Preventing Aggregation of the Outer-Membrane Proteins tOmpA and OmpT

SurA is a conserved ATP-independent periplasmic chaperone involved in the biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins (OMPs). Escherichia coli SurA has a core domain and two peptidylprolyl isomerase (PPIase) domains, the role(s) of which remain unresolved. Here we show that while SurA homologues in early proteobacteria typically contain one or no PPIase domains, the presence of two PPIase domains is common in SurA in later proteobacteria, implying an evolutionary advantage for this domain architecture. Bioinformatics analysis of > 350,000 OMP sequences showed that their length, hydrophobicity and aggregation propensity are similar across the proteobacterial classes, ruling out a simple correlation between SurA domain architecture and these properties of OMP sequences. To investigate the role of the PPIase domains in SurA activity, we deleted one or both PPIase domains from E. coli SurA and investigated the ability of the resulting proteins to bind and prevent the aggregation of tOmpA (19 kDa) and OmpT (33 kDa). The results show that wild-type SurA inhibits the aggregation of both OMPs, as do the cytoplasmic OMP chaperones trigger factor and SecB. However, while the ability of SurA to bind and prevent tOmpA aggregation does not depend on its PPIase domains, deletion of even a single PPIase domain ablates the ability of SurA to prevent OmpT aggregation. The results demonstrate that the core domain of SurA endows its generic chaperone ability, while the presence of PPIase domains enhances its chaperone activity for specific OMPs, suggesting one reason for the conservation of multiple PPIase domains in SurA in proteobacteria.     

Mapping of p140Cap Phosphorylation Sites: The EPLYA and EGLYA Motifs Have a Key Role in Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Csk Binding,and Are Substrates of the Abl Kinase

Protein phosphorylation tightly regulates specific binding of effector proteins that control many diverse biological functions of cells (e. g. signaling, migration and proliferation). p140Cap is an adaptor protein, specifically expressed in brain, testis and epithelial cells, that undergoes phosphorylation and tunes its interactions with other regulatory molecules via post-translation modification. In this work, using mass spectrometry, we found that p140Cap is in vivo phosphorylated on tyrosine (Y) within the peptide GEGLpYADPYGLLHEGR (from now on referred to as EGLYA) as well as on three serine residues. Consistently, EGLYA has the highest score of in silico prediction of p140Cap phosphorylation. To further investigate the p140Cap function, we performed site specific mutagenesis on tyrosines inserted in EGLYA and EPLYA, a second sequence with the same highest score of phosphorylation. The mutant protein, in which both EPLYA/EGLYA tyrosines were converted to phenylalanine, was no longer tyrosine phosphorylated, despite the presence of other tyrosine residues in p140Cap sequence. Moreover, this mutant lost its ability to bind the C-terminal Src kinase (Csk), previously shown to interact with p140Cap by Far Western analysis. In addition, we found that in vitro and in HEK-293 cells, the Abelson kinase is the major kinase involved in p140Cap tyrosine phosphorylation on the EPLYA and EGLYA sequences. Overall, these data represent an original attempt to in vivo characterise phosphorylated residues of p140Cap. Elucidating the function of p140Cap will provide novel insights into its biological activity not only in normal cells, but also in tumors.     

Differential Expression of PTP1D, a Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase with Two SH2 Domains, in Slow and Fast Skeletal Muscle Fibers

We show that PTP1D, a protein tyrosine phosphatase that contains two SH2 domains, is preferentially expressed in slow skeletal muscle fibers. Immunohistochemical staining using polyclonal antibodies against PTP1D demonstrated that PTP1D was expressed in a subpopulation of rodent muscle fibers. These fibers were identified as slow Type I fibers based on histochemical ATPase assays and slow myosin heavy chain expression. Northern and Western analyses showed that PTP1D levels were higher in predominantly slow muscles than in predominantly fast muscles. This differential expression of PTP1D in slow muscle fibers appeared by birth. In cultures of mouse myogenic cells, PTP1D was expressed after MyoD and myogenin and appeared in myotubes derived from embryonic, fetal, and postnatal myoblasts. Remarkably, PTP1D was organized into sarcomeres in a pattern coincident with myosin heavy chain, suggesting that PTP1D associates with a component of the thick filament. These results show that PTP1D is preferentially expressed in slow muscle fibers. We speculate that PTP1D may play a role in slow muscle fiber function and differentiation.     

The N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Subunits NR2A and NR2B Bind to the SH2 Domains of Phospholipase C-γ

Abstract: The NMDA receptor has recently been found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine. To assess the possible connection between tyrosine phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor and signaling pathways in the postsynaptic cell, we have investigated the relationship between tyrosine phosphorylation and the binding of NMDA receptor subunits to the SH2 domains of phospholipase C-γ (PLC-γ). A glutathione S -transferase (GST) fusion protein containing both the N- and the C-proximal SH2 domains of PLC-γ was bound to glutathione-agarose and reacted with synaptic junctional proteins and glycoproteins. Tyrosine-phosphorylated PSD-GP180, which has been identified as the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor, bound to the SH2-agarose beads in a phosphorylation-dependent fashion. Immunoblot analysis with antibodies specific for individual NMDA receptor subunits showed that both NR2A and NR2B subunits bound to the SH2-agarose. No binding occurred to GST-agarose lacking an associated SH2 domain, indicating that binding was specific for the SH2 domains. The binding of receptor subunits increased after the incubation of synaptic junctions with ATP and decreased after treatment of synaptic junctions with exogenous protein tyrosine phosphatase. Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that NR2A and NR2B were phosphorylated on tyrosine and further that tyrosine phosphorylation of each of the subunits was increased after incubation with ATP. The results demonstrate that NMDA receptor subunits NR2A and NR2B will bind to the SH2 domains of PLC-γ and that isolated synaptic junctions contain endogenous protein tyrosine kinase(s) that can phosphorylate both NR2A and NR2B receptor subunits, and suggest that interaction of the tyrosine-phosphorylated NMDA receptor with proteins that contain SH2 domains may serve to link it to signaling pathways in the postsynaptic cell.     

The SAM Domains of Anks Family Proteins Are Critically Involved in Modulating the Degradation of EphA Receptors

We recently reported that the phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain of Anks family proteins binds to EphA8, thereby positively regulating EphA8-mediated signaling pathways. In the current study, we identified a potential role for the SAM domains of Anks family proteins in EphA signaling. We found that SAM domains of Anks family proteins directly bind to ubiquitin, suggesting that Anks proteins regulate the degradation of ubiquitinated EphA receptors. Consistent with the role of Cbl ubiquitin ligases in the degradation of Eph receptors, our results revealed that the ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl induced the ubiquitination and degradation of EphA8 upon ligand binding. Ubiquitinated EphA8 also bound to the SAM domains of Odin, a member of the Anks family proteins. More importantly, the overexpression of wild-type Odin protected EphA8 and EphA2 from undergoing degradation following ligand stimulation and promoted EphA-mediated inhibition of cell migration. In contrast, a SAM domain deletion mutant of Odin strongly impaired the function of endogenous Odin, suggesting that the mutant functions in a dominant-negative manner. An analysis of Odin-deficient primary embryonic fibroblasts indicated that Odin levels play a critical role in regulating the stability of EphA2 in response to ligand stimulation. Taken together, our studies suggest that the SAM domains of Anks family proteins play a pivotal role in enhancing the stability of EphA receptors by modulating the ubiquitination process.Activation of Eph receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) by ephrin ligands stimulates intracellular signaling pathways that regulate diverse cell behaviors such as axon guidance, cell adhesion, and cell migration (1). Activated Eph receptors also initiate negative signaling events that counteract or alter positive signals, thereby modulating biological outcomes. Negative signaling events associated with Eph RTKs include metalloprotease-mediated cleavage of ephrins and trans endocytosis of Eph-ephrin complexes (9, 15, 24). These negative regulatory mechanisms may be important in the repulsive mechanism responsible for retraction of cellular processes. Some studies suggest that c-Cbl, a RING finger E3 ligase, participates in activated Eph receptor signal termination. Ligand stimulation induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Cbl and facilitates the degradation of Eph receptors (19, 23). More recent studies have shown that the E3 ligase activity of c-Cbl is activated through tyrosine phosphorylation by Src family kinases and that c-Cbl is recruited to activated Eph receptors and induces the ubiquitination and degradation of the receptors (6, 14). These studies point to an important role for Cbl family ubiquitin (Ub) ligases in mediating the ubiquitination of activated Eph RTKs and in fine-tuning Eph receptor signaling pathways.Emerging evidence points to a critical role for Eph receptors in human diseases such as diabetes and cancer (2, 13, 17). For example, EphA2 overexpression has been found in many types of malignant tumors. Overexpression of EphA2 in nontransformed epithelial cells enhances tumorigenic and metastatic potential, whereas downregulation of EphA2 expression suppresses tumor growth and metastasis (4). In addition, either soluble ephrin-A ligand or a monoclonal antibody that activates and degrades EphA2 has been shown to inhibit the growth of human tumor xenografts in nude mice (5, 12). More recent evidence reveals that EphA2 cooperates with Erb2 (also known as Neu) to promote tumor progression in mice (3). These findings strongly suggest that EphA2 and possibly other Eph receptors function in tumor progression in the context of either specific oncogenes or tumor suppressors. In this respect, understanding the negative regulation of Eph receptors, such as their degradation, may have important implications in the design of effective antitumor therapeutics.Recently, we showed that Anks family proteins act as key scaffolding molecules in EphA8-mediated signaling pathways (20). Anks family proteins contain six ankyrin repeats at their N terminus, two SAM domains, and a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain at their C terminus (22). Odin and AβPP intracellular domain-associated protein 1b (AIDA-1b) belong to this protein family. Several isoforms of AIDA-1b have been described, and the regions encoding the PTB domain and the two SAM domains are very well conserved among all isoforms (7). Interestingly, AIDA-1 has been implicated in reducing AβPP processing through the inhibition of γ-secretase activity (7) and in increasing the global protein biosynthetic capacity in response to long-term neuronal stimulation through the regulation of nucleolar assembly (10). Functions attributed to Odin have been limited to its negative role in platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-mediated cell proliferation (16). In contrast to AIDA-1 proteins, Odin appears to be abundantly and ubiquitously expressed in many different mammalian cell lines, and its expression is restricted to the mouse embryonic brain rather than the adult brain (20). We recently reported that the PTB domains of Anks family proteins are crucial for the association of these proteins with the juxtamembrane (JM) domain of EphA8; however, an as-yet-unidentified motif in Anks family proteins also contributes to stable complex formation between these two proteins (20).While the SAM domains of Anks family proteins are highly conserved among all isoforms, the function of this domain is not well understood. In the current study, we identified a potential role for SAM domains in EphA signaling. We showed that while the ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of EphA8 upon ligand binding, the SAM domains of Anks family proteins associate with ubiquitinated EphA8 receptor and are critically involved in inhibiting the degradation of EphA2 and EphA8 receptors. These results suggest that the fine-tuning of EphA RTK signaling is regulated by a delicate balance between the activity of c-Cbl E3 ligase and Anks family proteins.     

Role of the Modular Domains of SR Proteins in Subnuclear Localization and Alternative Splicing Specificity

SR proteins are required for constitutive pre-mRNA splicing and also regulate alternative splice site selection in a concentration-dependent manner. They have a modular structure that consists of one or two RNA-recognition motifs (RRMs) and a COOH-terminal arginine/serine-rich domain (RS domain). We have analyzed the role of the individual domains of these closely related proteins in cellular distribution, subnuclear localization, and regulation of alternative splicing in vivo. We observed striking differences in the localization signals present in several human SR proteins. In contrast to earlier studies of RS domains in the Drosophila suppressor-of-white-apricot (SWAP) and Transformer (Tra) alternative splicing factors, we found that the RS domain of SF2/ASF is neither necessary nor sufficient for targeting to the nuclear speckles. Although this RS domain is a nuclear localization signal, subnuclear targeting to the speckles requires at least two of the three constituent domains of SF2/ASF, which contain additive and redundant signals. In contrast, in two SR proteins that have a single RRM (SC35 and SRp20), the RS domain is both necessary and sufficient as a targeting signal to the speckles. We also show that RRM2 of SF2/ASF plays an important role in alternative splicing specificity: deletion of this domain results in a protein that, although active in alternative splicing, has altered specificity in 5′ splice site selection. These results demonstrate the modularity of SR proteins and the importance of individual domains for their cellular localization and alternative splicing function in vivo.     

Tubulin Tyrosine Ligase Like 12, a TTLL Family Member with SET- and TTL-Like Domains and Roles in Histone and Tubulin Modifications and Mitosis

hTTLL12 is a member of the tubulin tyrosine ligase (TTL) family that is highly conserved in phylogeny. It has both SET-like and TTL-like domains, suggesting that it could have histone methylation and tubulin tyrosine ligase activities. Altered expression of hTTLL12 in human cells leads to specific changes in H4K20 trimethylation, and tubulin detyrosination, hTTLL12 does not catalyse histone methylation or tubulin tyrosination in vitro, as might be expected from the lack of critical amino acids in its SET-like and TTLL-like domains. hTTLL12 misexpression increases mitotic duration and chromosome numbers. These results suggest that hTTLL12 has non-catalytic functions related to tubulin and histone modification, which could be linked to its effects on mitosis and chromosome number stability.     

Tyrosine Residues in the Cytoplasmic Domains Affect Sorting and Fusion Activity of the Nipah Virus Glycoproteins in Polarized Epithelial Cells

The highly pathogenic Nipah virus (NiV) is aerially transmitted and causes a systemic infection after entering the respiratory tract. Airway epithelia are thus important targets in primary infection. Furthermore, virus replication in the mucosal surfaces of the respiratory or urinary tract in later phases of infection is essential for virus shedding and transmission. So far, the mechanisms of NiV replication in epithelial cells are poorly elucidated. In the present study, we provide evidence that bipolar targeting of the two NiV surface glycoproteins G and F is of biological importance for fusion in polarized epithelia. We demonstrate that infection of polarized cells induces focus formation, with both glycoproteins located at lateral membranes of infected cells adjacent to uninfected cells. Supporting the idea of a direct spread of infection via lateral cell-to-cell fusion, we could identify basolateral targeting signals in the cytoplasmic domains of both NiV glycoproteins. Tyrosine 525 in the F protein is part of an endocytosis signal and is also responsible for basolateral sorting. Surprisingly, we identified a dityrosine motif at position 28/29 in the G protein, which mediates polarized targeting. A dileucine motif predicted to function as sorting signal is not involved. Mutation of the targeting signal in one of the NiV glycoproteins prevented the fusion of polarized cells, suggesting that basolateral or bipolar F and G expression facilitates the spread of NiV within epithelial cell monolayers, thereby contributing to efficient virus spread in mucosal surfaces in early and late phases of infection.Nipah virus (NiV) is a zoonotic and highly pathogenic member of the genus Henipavirus within the family Paramyxoviridae. NiV emerged for the first time in 1998 and caused an outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs and fatal encephalitis in humans in Malaysia and Singapore (9). Fruit bats of the genus Pteropus have been identified as the major natural reservoir host (50). Due to the lack of therapeutic or prophylactic options and the high mortality rates associated with human infections, work with live NiV requires biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) containment.As a typical member of the family Paramyxoviridae, NiV possesses two viral surface glycoproteins that are required for virus entry and spread. Glycoprotein G is responsible for the binding of the virus to cellular ephrin-B2 and -B3 receptors (3, 35, 36). After receptor binding, the viral fusion protein F mediates pH-independent fusion of viral and cellular membranes (virus entry) or fusion of cellular membranes (cell-to-cell fusion). To be fusion active, the precursor F₀ must be proteolytically cleaved into the subunits F₁ and F₂ by host cell proteases. This proteolytic activation requires clathrin-mediated endocytosis, due to a tyrosine-based signal in the cytoplasmic tail of the F protein, and subsequent cleavage by endosomal cathepsin L (12, 37, 45). Only after recycling from endosomes to the cell surface is fusion-active F protein available for incorporation into budding virions or for the initiation of cell-to-cell fusion (13).The respiratory tract is the most common route of virus entry into the human body. Following respiratory invasion, some viruses, such as influenza virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus, remain localized, and virions are disseminated only locally by transport in mucus or inflammatory exudates, which permit access to new target cells in the lung. Even if these viruses can cause severe diseases, they fail to penetrate beyond the mucosal surface. Other viruses, such as measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella viruses, also infect via the respiratory tract but then enter the blood circulation from the airways without causing major local symptoms. NiV enters via the airways and subsequently spreads systemically, with extensive endothelial involvement leading to vasculitis, which is mostly responsible for the clinical disease. In addition, NiV often causes symptomatic respiratory infections. Respiratory illness is generally observed in pigs and in about half of human infections (9, 24, 30, 38). A retrospective analysis of NiV outbreaks in Bangladesh strongly suggested that the patients with symptomatic respiratory tract infections were responsible for human-to-human transmission (24). Thus, NiV infection of the airway mucosa is relevant not only for primary NiV infection, serving as a portal of virus entry, but also for virus shedding and transmission to other hosts. Beside respiratory epithelia, epithelial cells in the kidney and bladder have been shown to be infected in vivo and are suggested to be important sites of release of progeny virions into the urine (8, 29, 34, 49; for a review, see reference 26).The major characteristics of polarized epithelial cells are structurally and functionally discrete apical and basolateral plasma membrane domains. To maintain the distinct protein compositions of these domains, newly synthesized membrane proteins must be sorted to their sites of ultimate function and residence (28). Due to the polarized nature of epithelia, virus receptors or viral proteins can be selectively expressed at either apical or basolateral cell surfaces. This can restrict virus entry, budding, or cell-to-cell fusion, with significant implications for virus spread and thus for pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of NiV spread within epithelial cells, focusing on the roles of the two surface glycoproteins G and F. We could show that infection of polarized MDCK cells leads to the formation of viral foci. The finding that both NiV glycoproteins not only were expressed apically but also were present at lateral membranes in infected cells adjacent to noninfected cells suggested that the infection spreads by cell-to-cell fusion. When we analyzed the distributions of F and G proteins upon single expression, we observed that the presence of the glycoproteins at (baso)lateral membranes is signal mediated. We could demonstrate that both proteins possess tyrosine-based targeting motifs in their cytoplasmic tails (Y₅₂₅ in the F protein and Y_28/29 in the G protein), which mediate sorting to the basolateral membranes of polarized epithelia. Fusion of polarized cells was observed only when the basolateral sorting signals of both glycoproteins were intact. These observations support the notion that basolateral or bipolar expression of F and G proteins is required and responsible for the spread of infection across the lateral junctions via glycoprotein-mediated cell-to-cell fusion.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Selected Secretory Carrier Membrane Proteins, SCAMP1 and SCAMP3, and Association with the EGF Receptor

Secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs) are ubiquitously expressed proteins of post-Golgi vesicles. In the presence of the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor vanadate, or after overexpression in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, SCAMP1 and SCAMP3 are phosphorylated selectively on tyrosine residue(s). Phosphorylation is reversible after vanadate washout in situ or when isolated SCAMP3 is incubated with the recombinant tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B. Vanadate also causes the partial accumulation of SCAMP3, but not SCAMP1, in “patches” at or near the cell surface. A search for SCAMP kinase activities has shown that SCAMPs 1 and 3, but not SCAMP2, are tyrosine phosphorylated in EGF-stimulated murine fibroblasts overexpressing the EGF receptor (EGFR). EGF catalyzes the progressive phosphorylation of the SCAMPs up to 1 h poststimulation and may enhance colocalization of the EGFR and SCAMP3 within the cell interior. EGF also induces SCAMP–EGFR association, as detected by coimmunoprecipitation, and phosphorylation of SCAMP3 is stimulated by the EGFR in vitro. These results suggest that phosphorylation of SCAMPs, either directly or indirectly, may be functionally linked to the internalization/down-regulation of the EGFR.     

Multiple Domains in PEX16 Mediate Its Trafficking and Recruitment of Peroxisomal Proteins to the ER

Peroxisomes rely on a diverse array of mechanisms to ensure the specific targeting of their protein constituents. Peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs), for instance, are targeted by at least two distinct pathways: directly to peroxisomes from their sites of synthesis in the cytosol or indirectly via the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, the extent to which each PMP targeting pathway is involved in the maintenance of pre‐existing peroxisomes is unclear. Recently, we showed that human PEX16 plays a critical role in the ER‐dependent targeting of PMPs by mediating the recruitment of two other PMPs, PEX3 and PMP34, to the ER. Here, we extend these results by carrying out a comprehensive mutational analysis of PEX16 aimed at gaining insights into the molecular targeting signals responsible for its ER‐to‐peroxisome trafficking and the domain(s) involved in PMP recruitment function at the ER. We also show that the recruitment of PMPs to the ER by PEX16 is conserved in plants. The implications of these results in terms of the function of PEX16 and the role of the ER in peroxisome maintenance in general are discussed.