Interactions of Human Mismatch Repair Proteins MutS�� and MutL�� with Proteins of the ATR-Chk1 Pathway

At clinically relevant doses, chemotherapeutic S_N1 DNA methylating agents induce an ATR-mediated checkpoint response in human cells that is dependent on functional MutSα and MutLα. Deficiency of either mismatch repair activity renders cells highly resistant to this class of drug, but the mechanisms linking mismatch repair to checkpoint activation have remained elusive. In this study we have systematically examined the interactions of human MutSα and MutLα with proteins of the ATR-Chk1 pathway using both nuclear extracts and purified proteins. Using nuclear co-immunoprecipitation, we have detected interaction of MutSα with ATR, TopBP1, Claspin, and Chk1 and interaction of MutLα with TopBP1 and Claspin. We were unable to detect interaction of MutSα or MutLα with Rad17, Rad9, or replication protein A in the extract system. Use of purified proteins confirmed direct interaction of MutSα with ATR, TopBP1, and Chk1 and of MutLα with TopBP1. MutSα-Claspin and MutLα-Claspin interactions were not demonstrable with purified proteins, suggesting that extract interactions are indirect or depend on post-translational modification. Use of a modified chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that proliferating cell nuclear antigen, ATR, TopBP1, and Chk1 are recruited to chromatin in a MutLα- and MutSα-dependent fashion after N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine treatment. However, chromatin enrichment of replication protein A, Claspin, Rad17-RFC, and Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 was not detected in these experiments. Although our failure to observe enrichment of the latter activities could be due to sensitivity limitations, these observations may indicate a novel mechanism for ATR activation.     

Nucleosome structural studies

Chromatin plays a fundamental role in eukaryotic genomic regulation, and the increasing awareness of the importance of epigenetic processes in human health and disease emphasizes the need for understanding the structure and function of the nucleosome. Recent advances in chromatin structural studies, including the first structures of nucleosomes containing the Widom 601 sequence and the structure of a chromatin protein-nucleosome assembly, have provided new insight into stretching of nucleosomal DNA, nucleosome positioning, binding of metal ions, drugs and therapeutic candidates to nucleosomes, and nucleosome recognition by nuclear proteins. These discoveries ensure promising future prospects for unravelling structural attributes of chromatin.     

Stability of nucleosome placement in newly repaired regions of DNA

Rearrangements of chromatin structure during excision repair of UV-damaged DNA appear to involve unfolding of nucleosomal DNA while repair is taking place, followed by refolding of this DNA into a native nucleosome structure. Recently, we found that repair patches are not distributed uniformly along the DNA in nucleosome core particles immediately following their refolding into nucleosomes (Lan, S. Y., and Smerdon, M. J. (1985) Biochemistry, 24,7771). Therefore, the distribution of repair patches in nucleosome core DNA was used to monitor the stability of nucleosome placement in these regions. Our results indicate that in nondividing human cells undergoing excision repair there is a slow change in the positioning of nucleosomes in newly repaired regions of chromatin, resulting in the eventual randomization of repair patches in nucleosome core DNA. Furthermore, the nonrandom placement of nucleosomes observed just after the refolding event is not re-established during DNA replication. Possible mechanisms for this change in nucleosome placement along the DNA are discussed.     

Chromatin remodeling activities act on UV-damaged nucleosomes and modulate DNA damage accessibility to photolyase

Nucleosomes inhibit DNA repair in vitro, suggesting that chromatin remodeling activities might be required for efficient repair in vivo. To investigate how structural and dynamic properties of nucleosomes affect damage recognition and processing, we investigated repair of UV lesions by photolyase on a nucleosome positioned at one end of a 226-bp-long DNA fragment. Repair was slow in the nucleosome but efficient outside. No disruption or movement of the nucleosome was observed after UV irradiation and during repair. However, incubation with the nucleosome remodeling complex SWI/SNF and ATP altered the conformation of nucleosomal DNA as judged by UV photo-footprinting and promoted more homogeneous repair. Incubation with yISW2 and ATP moved the nucleosome to a more central position, thereby altering the repair pattern. This is the first demonstration that two different chromatin remodeling complexes can act on UV-damaged nucleosomes and modulate repair. Similar activities might relieve the inhibitory effect of nucleosomes on DNA repair processes in living cells.     

Spontaneous access to DNA target sites in folded chromatin fibers

DNA wrapped in nucleosomes is sterically occluded from many protein complexes that must act on it; how such complexes gain access to nucleosomal DNA is not known. In vitro studies on isolated nucleosomes show that they undergo spontaneous partial unwrapping conformational transitions, which make the wrapped nucleosomal DNA transiently accessible. Thus, site exposure might provide a general mechanism allowing access of protein complexes to nucleosomal DNA. However, existing quantitative analyses of site exposure focused on single nucleosomes, while the presence of neighbor nucleosomes and concomitant chromatin folding might significantly influence site exposure. In this work, we carried out quantitative studies on the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA in homogeneous nucleosome arrays. Two striking findings emerged. Organization into chromatin fibers changes the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA only modestly, from ∼ 3-fold decreases to ∼ 8-fold increases in accessibility. This means that nucleosome arrays are intrinsically dynamic and accessible even when they are visibly condensed. In contrast, chromatin folding decreases the accessibility of linker DNA by as much as ∼ 50-fold. Thus, nucleosome positioning dramatically influences the accessibility of target sites located inside nucleosomes, while chromatin folding dramatically regulates access to target sites in linker DNA.     

Initiation and bidirectional propagation of chromatin assembly from a target site for nucleotide excision repair.

To restore full genomic integrity in a eukaryotic cell, DNA repair processes have to be coordinated with the resetting of nucleosomal organization. We have established a cell-free system using Drosophila embryo extracts to investigate the mechanism linking de novo nucleosome formation to nucleotide excision repair (NER). Closed-circular DNA containing a uniquely placed cisplatin-DNA adduct was used to follow chromatin assembly specifically from a site of NER. Nucleosome formation was initiated from a target site for NER. The assembly of nucleosomes propagated bidirectionally, creating a regular nucleosomal array extending beyond the initiation site. Furthermore, this chromatin assembly was still effective when the repair synthesis step in the NER process was inhibited.     

Nucleosomes protect DNA from DNA methylation in vivo and in vitro

Positioned nucleosomes limit the access of proteins to DNA. However, the impact of nucleosomes on DNA methylation in vitro and in vivo is poorly understood. Here, we performed a detailed analysis of nucleosome binding and nucleosomal DNA methylation by the de novo methyltransferases. We show that compared to linker DNA, nucleosomal DNA is largely devoid of CpG methylation. ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling frees nucleosomal CpG dinucleotides and renders the remodelled nucleosome a 2-fold better substrate for Dnmt3a methyltransferase compared to free DNA. These results reflect the situation in vivo, as quantification of nucleosomal DNA methylation levels in HeLa cells shows a 2-fold decrease of nucleosomal DNA methylation levels compared to linker DNA. Our findings suggest that nucleosomal positions are stably maintained in vivo and nucleosomal occupancy is a major determinant of global DNA methylation patterns in vivo.     

Mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins cooperate in the recognition of DNA interstrand crosslinks

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are among the most cytotoxic types of DNA damage, thus ICL-inducing agents such as psoralen, are clinically useful chemotherapeutics. Psoralen-modified triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) have been used to target ICLs to specific genomic sites to increase the selectivity of these agents. However, how TFO-directed psoralen ICLs (Tdp-ICLs) are recognized and processed in human cells is unclear. Previously, we reported that two essential nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein complexes, XPA–RPA and XPC–RAD23B, recognized ICLs in vitro, and that cells deficient in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) complex MutSβ were sensitive to psoralen ICLs. To further investigate the role of MutSβ in ICL repair and the potential interaction between proteins from the MMR and NER pathways on these lesions, we performed electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of MutSβ and NER proteins with Tdp-ICLs. We found that MutSβ bound to Tdp-ICLs with high affinity and specificity in vitro and in vivo, and that MutSβ interacted with XPA–RPA or XPC–RAD23B in recognizing Tdp-ICLs. These data suggest that proteins from the MMR and NER pathways interact in the recognition of ICLs, and provide a mechanistic link by which proteins from multiple repair pathways contribute to ICL repair.     

Repair of UV lesions in nucleosomes--intrinsic properties and remodeling

Nucleotide excision repair and reversal of pyrimidine dimers by photolyase (photoreactivation) are two major pathways to remove UV-lesions from DNA. Here, it is discussed how lesions are recognized and removed when the DNA is condensed into nucleosomes. During the recent years it was shown that nucleosomes inhibit photolyase and excision repair in vitro and slow down repair in vivo. The correlation of DNA-repair rates with nucleosome positions in yeast suggests that intrinsic properties of nucleosomes such as mobility and transient unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA facilitate damage recognition. Moreover, it was shown that nucleosome remodeling activities can act on UV-damaged DNA in vitro and facilitate repair suggesting that random remodeling of chromatin might contribute to damage recognition in vivo. Recent work on nucleosome structure and mobility is included to evaluate how nucleosomes accommodate DNA lesions and how nucleosome mobility and remodeling can take place on damaged DNA.     

Mismatch Recognition Protein MutS�� Does Not Hijack (CAG)n Hairpin Repair in Vitro

CAG repeats form stable hairpin structures, which are believed to be responsible for CAG repeat expansions associated with certain human neurological diseases. Human cells possess an accurate DNA hairpin repair system that prevents expansion of disease-associated CAG repeats. Based on transgenic animal studies, it is suggested that (CAG)_n expansion is caused by abnormal binding of the MutSβ mismatch recognition protein to (CAG)_n hairpins, leading to hijacking mismatch repair function during (CAG)_n hairpin repair. We demonstrate here that MutSβ displays identical biochemical and biophysical activities (including ATP-provoked conformational change, ATPase, ATP binding, and ADP binding) when interacting with a (CAG)_n hairpin and a mismatch. More importantly, our in vitro functional hairpin repair assays reveal that excess MutSβ does not inhibit (CAG)_n hairpin repair in HeLa nuclear extracts. Evidence presented here provides a novel view as to whether or not MutSβ is involved in CAG repeat instability in humans.Expansion of trinucleotide repeats (TNRs)³ causes hereditary neurological disorders such as Huntington disease and myotonic dystrophy, whose clinical symptoms are directly linked to expansion of CAG and CTG repeats, respectively (1–3). The precise mechanisms by which TNR expansion occurs and the factors that promote it are not fully understood. It has been proposed that CAG and CTG repeats form thermostable hairpins that include A-A and T-T mispairs in the hairpin stem (4, 5). Therefore, cellular mechanisms that process DNA hairpin/loop structures and/or A-A or T-T mispairs may influence TNR stability.Recent studies have identified and characterized a DNA hairpin repair (HPR) system in human cells that promotes CAG/CTG repeat stability (6, 7). The mechanism of human HPR involves incision and removal of CAG/CTG repeat hairpins in a nick-directed and proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent manner, followed by DNA resynthesis using the continuous strand as a template (6). In addition to human HPR, the human mismatch repair (MMR) system is well known for its role in stabilizing simple repetitive sequences called microsatellites, which are prone to forming small loops or insertion/deletion (ID) mispairs. In human cells, MutSα (MSH2–MSH6) and MutSβ (MSH2–MSH3) both bind to 1–2-nt ID mispairs, but MutSβ has higher affinity for these small loops (8). Defects in MMR genes cause microsatellite instability and predisposition to cancer (9), demonstrating that MMR is essential for genetic stability in human cells. Surprisingly, genetic studies in mice suggest that MutSβ promotes (CAG)_n expansion and TNR instability. These studies show that expansion of a heterologous (CAG)_n tract occurs in wild type and MSH6^−/− mice but that expansion of the (CAG)_n tract is suppressed in MSH2^−/− and MSH3^−/− mice (10, 11). Recently, Owens et al. (11) reported that binding to a (CAG)_n hairpin influences the protein conformation, nucleotide binding, and hydrolysis activities of MutSβ so that they are different from what has been reported for MutSα during mismatch recognition. It is therefore hypothesized that (CAG)_n hairpins, through their ability to alter the biochemical properties of MutSβ, hijack the MMR process, leading to CAG repeat expansion instead of CAG hairpin removal (11). However, it is not clear why MMR, a major genome maintenance system, would promote TNR instability instead of TNR stability. We, therefore, have developed a novel functional assay and examined the validity of this hypothesis. Our results reveal that MutSβ displays normal biochemical activities when binding to CAG hairpins and does not inhibit (CAG)_n hairpin repair. The observations presented here provide novel thoughts on whether or not or how MutSβ is involved in CAG repeat instability in human cells.     

Characterization of Dnmt1 Binding and DNA Methylation on Nucleosomes and Nucleosomal Arrays

The packaging of DNA into nucleosomes and the organisation into higher order structures of chromatin limits the access of sequence specific DNA binding factors to DNA. In cells, DNA methylation is preferentially occuring in the linker region of nucleosomes, suggesting a structural impact of chromatin on DNA methylation. These observations raise the question whether DNA methyltransferases are capable to recognize the nucleosomal substrates and to modify the packaged DNA. Here, we performed a detailed analysis of nucleosome binding and nucleosomal DNA methylation by the maintenance DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1. Our binding studies show that Dnmt1 has a DNA length sensing activity, binding cooperatively to DNA, and requiring a minimal DNA length of 20 bp. Dnmt1 needs linker DNA to bind to nucleosomes and most efficiently recognizes nucleosomes with symmetric DNA linkers. Footprinting experiments reveal that Dnmt1 binds to both DNA linkers exiting the nucleosome core. The binding pattern correlates with the efficient methylation of DNA linkers. However, the enzyme lacks the ability to methylate nucleosomal CpG sites on mononucleosomes and nucleosomal arrays, unless chromatin remodeling enzymes create a dynamic chromatin state. In addition, our results show that Dnmt1 functionally interacts with specific chromatin remodeling enzymes to enable complete methylation of hemi-methylated DNA in chromatin.     

Mispair-bound human MutS–MutL complex triggers DNA incisions and activates mismatch repair

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) relies on MutS and MutL ATPases for mismatch recognition and strand-specific nuclease recruitment to remove mispaired bases in daughter strands. However, whether the MutS–MutL complex coordinates MMR by ATP-dependent sliding on DNA or protein–protein interactions between the mismatch and strand discrimination signal is ambiguous. Using functional MMR assays and systems preventing proteins from sliding, we show that sliding of human MutSα is required not for MMR initiation, but for final mismatch removal. MutSα recruits MutLα to form a mismatch-bound complex, which initiates MMR by nicking the daughter strand 5′ to the mismatch. Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) is then recruited to the nick and conducts 5′ → 3′ excision. ATP-dependent MutSα dissociation from the mismatch is necessary for Exo1 to remove the mispaired base when the excision reaches the mismatch. Therefore, our study has resolved a long-standing puzzle, and provided new insights into the mechanism of MMR initiation and mispair removal.Subject terms: Molecular biology     

A quantitative model of nucleosome dynamics

The expression, replication and repair of eukaryotic genomes require the fundamental organizing unit of chromatin, the nucleosome, to be unwrapped and disassembled. We have developed a quantitative model of nucleosome dynamics which provides a fundamental understanding of these DNA processes. We calibrated this model using results from high precision single molecule nucleosome unzipping experiments, and then tested its predictions for experiments in which nucleosomes are disassembled by the DNA mismatch recognition complex hMSH2-hMSH6. We found that this calibrated model quantitatively describes hMSH2-hMSH6 induced disassembly rates of nucleosomes with two separate DNA sequences and four distinct histone modification states. In addition, this model provides mechanistic insight into nucleosome disassembly by hMSH2-hMSH6 and the influence of histone modifications on this disassembly reaction. This model''s precise agreement with current experiments suggests that it can be applied more generally to provide important mechanistic understanding of the numerous nucleosome alterations that occur during DNA processing.     

MutS�� and histone deacetylase complexes promote expansions of trinucleotide repeats in human cells

Trinucleotide repeat (TNR) expansions cause at least 17 heritable neurological diseases, including Huntington’s disease. Expansions are thought to arise from abnormal processing of TNR DNA by specific trans-acting proteins. For example, the DNA repair complex MutSβ (MSH2–MSH3 heterodimer) is required in mice for on-going expansions of long, disease-causing alleles. A distinctive feature of TNR expansions is a threshold effect, a narrow range of repeat units (∼30–40 in humans) at which mutation frequency rises dramatically and disease can initiate. The goal of this study was to identify factors that promote expansion of threshold-length CTG•CAG repeats in a human astrocytic cell line. siRNA knockdown of the MutSβ subunits MSH2 or MSH3 impeded expansions of threshold-length repeats, while knockdown of the MutSα subunit MSH6 had no effect. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that MutSβ, but not MutSα, was enriched at the TNR. These findings imply a direct role for MutSβ in promoting expansion of threshold-length CTG•CAG tracts. We identified the class II deacetylase HDAC5 as a novel promoting factor for expansions, joining the class I deacetylase HDAC3 that was previously identified. Double knockdowns were consistent with the possibility that MutSβ, HDAC3 and HDAC5 act through a common pathway to promote expansions of threshold-length TNRs.     

The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair

The complexity of chromatin architecture presents a significant barrier to the ability of the DNA repair machinery to access and repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Consequently, remodeling of the chromatin landscape adjacent to DSBs is vital for efficient DNA repair. Here, we demonstrate that DNA damage destabilizes nucleosomes within chromatin regions that correspond to the γ-H2AX domains surrounding DSBs. This nucleosome destabilization is an active process requiring the ATPase activity of the p400 SWI/SNF ATPase and histone acetylation by the Tip60 acetyltransferase. p400 is recruited to DSBs by a mechanism that is independent of ATM but requires mdc1. Further, the destabilization of nucleosomes by p400 is required for the RNF8-dependent ubiquitination of chromatin, and for the subsequent recruitment of brca1 and 53BP1 to DSBs. These results identify p400 as a novel DNA damage response protein and demonstrate that p400-mediated alterations in nucleosome and chromatin structure promote both chromatin ubiquitination and the accumulation of brca1 and 53BP1 at sites of DNA damage.     

Proteomic Analysis Reveals a Novel Mutator S (MutS) Partner Involved in Mismatch Repair Pathway

The mismatch repair (MMR) family is a highly conserved group of proteins that function in correcting base–base and insertion–deletion mismatches generated during DNA replication. Disruption of this process results in characteristic microsatellite instability (MSI), repair defects, and susceptibility to cancer. However, a significant fraction of MSI-positive cancers express MMR genes at normal levels and do not carry detectable mutation in known MMR genes, suggesting that additional factors and/or mechanisms may exist to explain these MSI phenotypes in patients. To systematically investigate the MMR pathway, we conducted a proteomic analysis and identified MMR-associated protein complexes using tandem-affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (TAP-MS) method. The mass spectrometry data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD003014 and DOI 10.6019/PXD003014. We identified 230 high-confidence candidate interaction proteins (HCIPs). We subsequently focused on MSH2, an essential component of the MMR pathway and uncovered a novel MSH2-binding partner, WDHD1. We further demonstrated that WDHD1 forms a stable complex with MSH2 and MSH3 or MSH6, i.e. the MutS complexes. The specific MSH2/WDHD1 interaction is mediated by the second lever domain of MSH2 and Ala¹¹²³ site of WDHD1. Moreover, we showed that, just like MSH2-deficient cells, depletion of WDHD1 also led to 6-thioguanine (6-TG) resistance, indicating that WDHD1 likely contributes to the MMR pathway. Taken together, our study uncovers new components involved in the MMR pathway, which provides candidate genes that may be responsible for the development of MSI-positive cancers.Cells are equipped with a number of repair mechanisms to correct various types of DNA lesions. At least five major complimentary, but partially overlapping, multistep damage repair pathways are known to operate in mammals: mismatch repair (MMR)¹, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and double-strand break repair, which includes both homologous recombination repair and nonhomologous end joining (see review: (1, 2)). In particular, MMR is a major repair pathway that prevents both base substitution and insertion–deletion mismatches due to replication errors (3–5).MMR is a highly conserved biological pathway that exists from bacteria to mammals. MMR process can be divided into three key steps: mismatch recognition, excision, and resynthesis (5, 6). The initial mismatch recognition step is fulfilled by MutS protein complexes, either MutSα (the MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer) or MutSβ (the MSH2-MSH3 heterodimer). The MutSα is primarily responsible for repairing base–base mismatches and small insertion–deletion loops of 1–2 nucleotides (7–9), while MutSβ preferentially recognizes larger insertion–deletion loops containing up to 14 extra nucleotides (10–12). Binding to mispaired DNA primes MutS to undergo a conformational change and recruitment of MutL to form an ATP-dependent ternary complex (13). Three different MutL heterodimeric complexes, MutLα, MutLβ, and MutLγ have been identified in the mammalian system. MLH1 heterodimerizes with PMS2, PMS1, or MLH3 to form MutLα, MutLβ, or MutLγ, respectively. MutLα plays a crucial role in MMR, as cells that lack either protein inactivate MMR in human cells, while loss of MutLβ or MutLγ heterodimers leads to minor defects in MMR. MutL is able to recognize and excise the lagging strand from the mismatch both distally and proximally (14, 15). Moreover, MutL interacts physically with MutS, enhances mismatch recognition, and recruits and activates exonuclease1 (EXO1) (16, 17). Exonuclease1 (EXO1) is the only enzyme with capabilities to excise nucleotide in 5′-3′ direction (18). In the case of 3′ excision, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)/replication factor C-dependent endonuclease activity plays a critical role in 3′-5′ excision involving EXO1. EXO1 then excises nascent DNA from the nick toward and beyond the mismatch to generate a single-strand gap, which is filled by DNA polymerases δ (lagging strand) or ε (leading strand) using the parental DNA strand as a template. Finally, the nick is sealed by DNA ligase I (19, 20). In addition, two MutS homologues, MSH4 and MSH5, share similar structure and sequence features with the other members of the MutS family. Recent evidence suggests that they function beyond MMR and are involved in processes such as recombinant repair, DNA damage signaling, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination (21, 22).It has been well documented that impairment of MMR genes, especially MSH2 and MLH1, cause susceptibility to certain types of cancer, including human nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. At the cellular level, deficient MMR results in a strong mutator phenotype known as microsatellite instability (MSI), which is a hallmark of MMR deficiency (3–5). However, a significant fraction of MSI-positive colorectal cancers express MMR genes at normal levels and do not carry detectable mutation or hypermethylation in known MMR genes (23). Similarly, certain noncolorectal cancer cells with MSI also appear to have normal expression of known MMR protein (24, 25). These observations suggest that additional factors and/or mechanisms may exist to explain these MSI phenotypes in patients.To address this question, we performed tandem affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry analysis (TAP-MS) to uncover MMR-associated protein complexes. Our proteomics study of the MMR family led to the discovery of many novel MMR-associated proteins, and gene ontology analysis expanded the roles of MMR in multiple biological processes. Specifically for MSH2, we uncovered a novel MutS binding partner WDHD1, which associates with both MutSα (MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer) and MutSβ (MSH2-MSH3 heterodimer). We provide additional evidence suggesting that WDHD1 is involved in the MMR pathway, which can be used as potential biomarker for MSI phenotypes in cancer patients.