Intra-articular patient-controlled analgesia improves early rehabilitation after knee surgery

The influence of patient-controlled intra-articular analgesia with ropivacaine, morphine and ketorolac (RMK) on postoperative pain relief and early rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was studied. Twenty six patients, randomized into two groups, were enrolled in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. At the end of surgery a catheter was placed intra-articularly and connected to a patient-controlled pump, programmed to deliver 10 mL bolus and 60 min lockout interval. RMK group received 0.25% ropivacaine, morphine 0.2 mg/mL and ketorolac 1 mg/mL; P group saline. Pain was measured with 10 cm visual analog scale. At pain scores > 3 cm, all patients were instructed to self-administer morphine intravenously using a patient-controlled pump. Daily rescue morphine consumption was noted and 48 h rehabilitation programme was evaluated. Daily morphine consumption was significantly lower in the RMK group (p < 0.001). At 24h after surgery, the patients in the RMK group experienced significantly less pain (p < 0.05). The patients in the RMK group achieved higher maximum degree of knee flexion in supine (p < 0.001) and in prone position (p < 0.05) compared to placebo group and better pain free flexion with assistance on day 1 (p < 0.05) and 2 (p > 0.05). The results show that patient-controlled intra-articular analgesia with RMK combination provides effective pain relief following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and improves early physical rehabilitation.     

Comparison of Transversus Abdominis Plane Infiltration with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Opioid Analgesia

Epidural analgesia is considered the standard of care but cannot be provided to all patients Liposomal bupivacaine has been approved for field blocks such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks but has not been clinically compared against other modalities. In this retrospective propensity matched cohort study we thus tested the primary hypothesis that TAP infiltration are noninferior (not worse) to continuous epidural analgesia and superior (better) to intravenous opioid analgesia in patients recovering from major lower abdominal surgery. 318 patients were propensity matched on 18 potential factors among three groups (106 per group): 1) TAP infiltration with bupivacaine liposome; 2) continuous Epidural analgesia with plain bupivacaine; and; 3) intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA). We claimed TAP noninferior (not worse) over Epidural if TAP was noninferior (not worse) on total morphine-equivalent opioid and time-weighted average pain score (10-point scale) within first 72 hours after surgery with noninferiority deltas of 1 (10-point scale) for pain and an increase less of 20% in the mean morphine equivalent opioid consumption. We claimed TAP or Epidural groups superior (better) over IV PCA if TAP or Epidural was superior on opioid consumption and at least noninferior on pain outcome. Multivariable linear regressions within the propensity-matched cohorts were used to model total morphine-equivalent opioid dose and time-weighted average pain score within first 72 hours after surgery; joint hypothesis framework was used for formal testing. TAP infiltration were noninferior to Epidural on both primary outcomes (p<0.001). TAP infiltration were noninferior to IV PCA on pain scores (p = 0.001) but we did not find superiority on opioid consumption (p = 0.37). We did not find noninferiority of Epidural over IV PCA on pain scores (P = 0.13) and nor did we find superiority on opioid consumption (P = 0.98). TAP infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine and continuous epidural analgesia were similar in terms of pain and opioid consumption, and not worse in pain compared with IV PCA. TAP infiltrations might be a reasonable alternative to epidural analgesia in abdominal surgical patients. A large randomized trial comparing these techniques is justified.     

Patient-controlled analgesia with ketorolac in pediatric surgery

Our aim was to quantify the analgesic efficiency of the patient-controlled analgesia technique (PCA), using ketorolac, in children aged 6-14 undergoing a surgical intervention. We carried out a double-blind test with two randomly selected groups: the PCA group comprising patients submitted to intravenous PCA, with "bolus on demand" and the Standard group, with conventional analgesia dispensed with ketorolac I.V. (0.5 mg/kg/6 hours). Evaluation of pain experienced was performed using the Hannallah behavioural scale and quantification of the summing of pain intensity. Analgesic efficiency was determined by the pain intensity difference (PID) score. Evaluation of pain experienced during hour 1 reveals a marked reduction with time for each group; no inter-group differences were found. At hour 6 there were neither intra-group nor inter-group differences. The accumulated pain score revealed a significant reduction in hour 6, with no differences between the two groups. Evaluation of the analgesic effect revealed no differences, either intra-group or intergroup, during the experimental period. The sum of the PIDs revealed significant differences in the standard group between the values for hours 1 and 6. Under the experimental conditions described, both techniques were equally effective for pain treatment, but the efficiency was higher for the PCA group.     

Patient-controlled and analgesia with ketorolac in pediatric surgery

Our aim was to quantify the analgesic efficiency of the patient-controlled analgesia technique (PCA), using ketorolac, in children aged 6–14 undergoing a surgical intervention. We carried out a double-blind test with two randomly selected groups: the PCA group comprising patients submitted to intravenous PCA, with “bolus on demand” and the Standard group, with conventional analgesia dispensed with ketorolac I.V. (0.5 mg/kg/6 hours). Evaluation of pain experienced was performed using the Hannallah behavioural scale and quantification of the summing of pain intensity. Analgesic efficiency was determined by the pain intensity difference (PID) score. Evaluation of pain experienced during hour 1 reveals a marked reduction with time for each group; no inter-group differences were found. At hour 6 there were neither intra-group nor inter-group differences. The accumulated pain score revealed a significant reduction in hour 6, with no differences between the two groups. Evaluation of the analgesic effect revealed no differences, either intra-group or intergroup, during the experimental period. The sum of the PIDs revealed significant differences in the standard group between the values for hours 1 and 6. Under the experimental conditions described, both techniques were equally effective for pain treatment, but the efficiency was higher for the PCA group.     

Local Infiltrative Analgesia is Equivalent to Fascia Iliaca Block for Perioperative Pain Management for Prophylactic Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation

BackgroundImpending pathologic fractures of the femur due to metastatic bone disease are treated with prophylactic internal fixation to prevent fracture, maintain independence, and improve quality of life. There is limited data to support an optimal perioperative pain regimen.MethodsA proof of concept comparative cohort analysis was performed: 21 patients who received a preoperative fascia iliacus nerve block (FIB) were analyzed retrospectively while 9 patients treated with local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) were analyzed prospectively. Primary outcomes included: visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, narcotic requirements and hospital length of stay. Patient cohorts were compared via two-sample t-tests and Fischer’s exact tests. Differences in VAS pain scores, length of stay and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum.ResultsThe LIA group had more patients treated with preoperative narcotics (p=0.042). There were no significant differences between the FIB and LIA groups in MME utilized intraoperatively (30.0 vs 37.5, p=0.79), on POD 0 (38.0 vs 30.0, p=0.93), POD 1 (46.0 vs 55.5, p=0.95) or POD 2 (40.0 vs 60.0 p=0.73). There were no significant differences in analog pain scale at any time point or in hospital length of stay (78 vs 102 hours, p=0.86).ConclusionDespite an increased number of patients being on preoperative narcotics in the LIA group, use of LIA compared with FIB is not associated with an increase in VAS pain scores, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), or length of hospital stay in patients undergoing prophylactic internal fixation of impending pathologic femur fractures.Level of Evidence: III     

经腹子宫全切术后舒芬太尼和芬太尼自控静脉镇痛的比较

目的观察舒芬太尼用于经腹子宫全切术后静脉镇痛效果、临床副作用,并与等效价的芬太尼比较有无优越性。方法选择择期硬膜外阻滞麻醉下经腹行子宫全切术患者80例,随机分为A组（芬太尼组）40例,B组（舒芬太尼组）40例。A组给予负荷量芬太尼40μg;B组给予负荷量舒芬太尼4μg。两组均采用珠海福尼亚电子微量泵（CPE-101—200型）行自控静脉镇痛。观察术后4、8、16、24h的疼痛、镇静、恶心呕吐的评分,记录血氧饱和度、镇痛液消耗量。疼痛情况用水平视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评估,镇静程度按Ramsay评分法评估。结果与A组比较,B组各时点VAS评分普遍低于A组,但仅术后24h差异有显著统计学意义（P〈0．05）。两组患者镇静评分均无达到3分者,B组各时点Ramsay评分普遍高于A组,其中术后16、24h差异有显著统计学意义（P〈0．05）。B组患者术后各时点镇痛液消耗量普遍低于A组,其中术后16、24h差异有显著统计学意义（P〈0．05）。两组术后恶心呕吐发生率均低,其中术后4h差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论经腹子宫全切术后舒芬太尼组的静脉镇痛效果略优于芬太尼组,镇静作用亦明显高于芬太尼组,而且减少恶心呕吐等副作用的发生率。     

自控镇痛技术在老年患者术后康复治疗中的护理体会

目的探讨老年患者术后应用自控镇痛技术对康复治疗的临床护理。方法将304例患者随机分成两组,治疗组给予术后自控镇痛,对照组给予阿片类或吗啡类止痛,分别对镇痛效果、胃肠道恢复时间、尿潴留发生率、睡眠情绪满意率几方面进行对比。结果两组间在镇痛评分（VAS）和睡眠情绪满意率存在统计学差异（P〈0.05）;而术后胃肠道恢复时间、尿潴留发生率两组间差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论良好的自控镇痛技术能提高老年患者术后镇痛质量和睡眠情绪满意度。何丽娟,汪凤梅,余丽花     

盐酸羟考酮注射液用于腹部全麻患者术后镇痛的有效性和安全性

目的:探讨盐酸羟考酮注射液用于腹部全麻患者术后镇痛的有效性和安全性。方法:选择2016年1月至2016年12月来我院治疗的择期全麻下行腹部手术的患者60例。按照治疗方法,采用随机数字表法将患者平均分为硫酸吗啡注射组(简称吗啡组)和盐酸羟考酮注射组(简称羟考酮组),每组30例。用药3、24、48 h后,采用VAS方法对患者进行疼痛评分。记录术后48 h内患者补救镇痛率以及患者对镇痛的满意度。记录72 h后患者恶心、呕吐等不良事件的发生情况。结果:镇痛48 h内的不同时间点,两组间VAS评分、补救镇痛率与吗啡组相比无显著差异(P0.05)。羟考酮组术后不良事件发生率为16.7%,显著低于吗啡组40.0%(P0.05),羟考酮组患者镇痛满意度显著高与吗啡组(93.3%vs.70.0%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:盐酸羟考酮注射液的镇痛效果与硫酸吗啡相当,且可安全有效地改善患者术后生活质量,提高患者满意度。     

Effects of clonidine preemptive analgesia on acute postoperative pain in abdominal surgery

Preemptive analgesia refers to blockade of afferent nerve fibers before a painful stimulus, which prevents or reduces subsequent pain even beyond the effect of the block. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of clonidine used before and at the end of operation on pain control in abdominal surgery. A total of 77 patients admitted for colorectal surgery were randomly classified into three groups: epidural clonidine before operation, epidural clonidine at the end of operation, and control group. After the operation on patient demand, analgesia with boluses of epidural morphine was instituted. The parameters of postoperative pain level using VAS score (visual analog scale), sedation and analgesics consumption were determined as outcome measures at 1, 2, 6, and 24 h of the operation. Clonidine administered before operation provided lowest pain scores at 6 and 24 h (p < 0.05). Clonidine administered at the end of operation had low pain scores at 1 and 2 h, with a significant pain breakthrough thereafter (6.93 +/- 1.66 at 6 h and 4.04 +/- 2.39 at 24 h) compared with the group administered clonidine before operation (3.60 +/- 2.94 and 3.71 +/- 1.82). Clonidine administered before operation provided less sedation (p < 0.05) and a significantly lower use of analgesics (p < 0.05). Blockade of nociceptive stimulus using the centrally acting alpha2-adrenergic agonist clonidine before the onset of pain stimulus resulted in reduced pain levels, sedation and analgesic requirement.     

B超声引导下肋锁间隙与喙突入路连续臂丛神经阻滞对Barton骨折术后镇痛效果比较

目的:比较超声引导下肋锁间隙与喙突两种入路连续臂丛神经阻滞对Barton骨折手术患者术后的镇痛效果。方法:选择择期行Barton骨折手术患者60例,随机分为肋锁间隙入路连续臂丛神经阻滞组(A组,n=30)和喙突入路连续锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞组(B组,n=30)。两组均在超声引导下进行臂丛神经阻滞,同时留置神经阻滞导管,麻醉后2小时经神经阻滞导管连接无线电子镇痛泵。记录手术过程中神经深度、麻醉操作时间,并评估麻醉效果;记录术后第一次追加药物时间;记录麻醉后6 h、12 h、18 h、24 h、36 h、48 h静息及运动状态VAS评分;记录术后第一天和第二天镇痛泵有效按压次数及补救镇痛情况;记录患者满意度及并发症发生情况。结果:与B组相比,A组神经深度明显减浅(P<0.05),麻醉操作时间显著缩短(P<0.05),术后第一次追加药物时间延长(P<0.05),麻醉后12 h、18 h、24 h、36 h静息及运动状态VAS评分较低(P<0.05),术后第一天有效按压次数明显减少(P<0.05),患者满意度评分高(P<0.05),误穿血管发生率明显减少(P<0.05)。结论:超声引导下肋锁间隙入路与喙突入路连续锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞均可安全有效用于Barton骨折手术术后镇痛;但肋锁间隙连续臂丛神经阻滞术后镇痛效果更好,且具有神经阻滞深度浅、操作时间更短、阻滞效果更好、患者满意度更高及并发症更少等优点。     

吗啡与氢吗啡酮在小儿静脉自控镇痛中的应用效果比较

目的:比较吗啡与氢吗啡酮在小儿静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)应用中的镇痛效果及副作用。方法:选取40名6~10岁择期行下肢骨科手术的患儿,术毕即予PCIA,随机分为两组:M组(吗啡背景剂量15μg/kg/h,PCA剂量15μg/kg)和H组(氢吗啡酮背景剂量3μg/kg/h,PCA剂量3μg/kg),每组20例。记录患儿PCIA后3、6、12、24和48h的FLACC疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静评分、PCA次数及不良反应的发生情况(恶心呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、尿潴留、过度镇静、呼吸抑制)。结果:两组患儿各时间点FLACC疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静评分比较均无统计学差异(P均0.05)。术后第二天,M组PCA次数少于H组,差异存在统计学意义(P0.05)。M组皮肤瘙痒发生率(15%)显著高于H组(0%)(P0.05),两组其余不良反应的发生情况比较均无统计学差异(P均0.05)。结论:氢吗啡酮与吗啡用于小儿术后PCIA的镇痛效果和安全性相当。     

Effects of Intra-Operative Total Intravenous Anaesthesia with Propofol versus Inhalational Anaesthesia with Sevoflurane on Post-Operative Pain in Liver Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Background

Patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol have been shown to experience less postoperative pain. We evaluated the post-operative analgesic effects of propofol compared with sevoflurane maintenance of anesthesia in liver surgery. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02179437","term_id":"NCT02179437"}}NCT02179437).

Methods

In this retrospective study, records of patients who underwent liver surgery between 2010 and 2013 were reviewed. Ninety-five patients anesthetized with propofol TIVA were matched with 95 patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Numeric pain rating scale (NRS) pain scores, postoperative morphine consumption, side effects and patients’ satisfaction with pain relief were evaluated.

Results

The TIVA group reported lower NRS pain scores during coughing on postoperative days 1 and 2 but not 3 (p = 0.0127, p = 0.0472, p = 0.4556 respectively). They also consumed significantly less daily (p = 0.001 on day 1, p = 0.0231 on day 2, p = 0.0004 on day 3), accumulative (p = 0.001 on day 1, p<0.0001 on day 2 and p = 0.0064 on day 3) and total morphine (p = 0.03) when compared with the sevoflurane group. There were no differences in total duration of intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine use and patient satisfaction. No difference was found in reported side effects.

Conclusion

Patients anesthetized with propofol TIVA reported less pain during coughing and consumed less daily, accumulative and total morphine after liver surgery.     

肺癌根治术后不同镇痛方式的临床效果比较

目的：观察和比较硬膜外自控镇痛（PCEA）和静脉自控镇痛（PCIA）用于肺癌根治术患者围术期的镇痛效果及其不良反应的发生情况。方法：选择择期全麻下行肺癌根治性切除术的患者1214例,ASAI～II级,依镇痛方式不同分为硬膜外自控镇痛组（PCEA组,n=1023）和静脉自控镇痛组（PCtA组,n=191）。观察围术期两组患者镇痛效果、不良反应及术后康复情况。结果：PCEA组术后2h静止状态下和术后6h、24h活动状态下VAS评分均明显低于PCIA组（P〈O．05）;术后48h的Ramsay评分明显低于PCIA组（P〈0．05）;术后住院时间明显短于PCIA组（P〈0．05）;肺部并发症的发生率、切口感染和术后谵妄、恶心呕吐的发生率均明显低于PCIA组（P〈0．01）。结论：PCEA和PCIA两种镇痛方式用于肺癌根治术患者围术期均可达到满意的临床镇痛效果,但PCEA的用药量更少,镇静作用轻,副反应少,并可以降低肺感染和切口感染的几率,缩短住院时间,更有利于肺癌根治术患者的镇痛和康复。     

罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在潜伏期分娩镇痛中的应用效果

目的:探讨罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在潜伏期分娩镇痛中的应用效果。方法:择取2015年1月~2016年1月我院收治的产妇102例,随机分为A、B、C组,各组34例,A组产妇宫口开至1 cm时采取罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼硬膜外自控分娩镇痛,B组产妇宫口开至3 cm时采取罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼硬膜外自控分娩镇痛,C组产妇未采取分娩镇痛,比较两组第一产程潜伏期、活跃期及第二产程持续时间及宫缩时视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分,比较各组产妇出血量、新生儿体质量及胎儿娩出后1 min、5 min Apgar评分,记录各组治疗30 d后不良反应。结果:A组、B组第一产程潜伏期持续时间明显较C组延长,活跃期持续时间较C组明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);A组产妇宫颈口开至2 cm和cm时VAS评分低于B组和C组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);A组、B组产妇在活跃期、第二产程时VAS评分低于C组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);各组产妇出血量、新生儿体质量、Apgar评分比较均无统计学意义(P0.05);C组抑郁症发生率均高于较A组和B组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:从产妇潜伏期开始应用罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼进行分娩镇痛的效果较好,具有良好的应用价值。     

Morphine-3-glucuronide--a potent antagonist of morphine analgesia

In this study, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), the major plasma and urinary metabolite of morphine, was shown to be a potent antagonist of morphine analgesia when administered to rats by the intra-cerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route. The antagonism of morphine analgesia was observed irrespective of whether i.c.v. M3G (2.5 or 3.0 micrograms) was administered 15 mins prior to or 15 mins after i.c.v. morphine (20 micrograms). When M3G (10mg) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) to rats 30-40 mins prior to morphine (1.5mg i.p.), the analgesic response was significantly reduced compared to administration of morphine (1.5mg i.p.) alone. It was further demonstrated that i.c.v. M3G (2.0 micrograms) antagonized the analgesic effects of subsequently administered i.c.v. morphine-6-glucuronide (0.25 micrograms).     

罗哌卡因配伍布托啡诺及芬太尼用于术后自控镇痛的临床观察

目的：观察布托啡诺、芬太尼、布托啡诺与芬太尼配伍罗哌卡因用于术后硬膜外自控镇痛（PCEA）的临床效果及安全性。方法：选择150例ASAI或Ⅱ级,拟择期行开胸手术的全麻联合硬膜外麻醉患者,将其随机分为罗哌卡因联合芬太尼组（RF）,罗哌卡因联合芬太尼与布托啡诺组（RFB）,罗哌卡因联合布托啡诺组（RB）,术毕采用硬膜外自控镇痛（PCEA）。记录并比较术后4、8、12、24、和48h的镇痛、镇静效果、舒适度、病人自控镇痛（PCA）给药次数及有效次数,监测其不良反应发生的发生情况。结果：三组PCEA方案均能达到良好镇痛和镇静目的,在术后4h、24h和48h,RFB组的VAs值均明显低于RF组（P〈0．05）,24h（P〈0．01）;术后8hVAS值明显小于RB组（P〈0．01）。术后RFB4hRamsay嗜睡少于RB组（P〈0．05）,其它时间段评分优于其他两组但无统计学意义。术后48h不良反应比较：恶心呕吐RFB低于RF（P〈0．05）;头痛头晕RFB组低于RB（P〈0．05）;嗜睡RFB组明显少于RB组（P〈0．01）。结论：罗哌卡因配伍布托啡诺及芬太尼用于术后硬膜外自控镇痛效果良好,值得在临床推荐使用。     

Comparing the efficacy of pain managements after total hip arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis

The aim of our current study is to compare efficiency of various interventions implemented for pain management after total hip arthroplasty (THA). PubMed and EMBASE were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the pain scales for evaluate the efficacy of pain control after THA including at least one pair of direct control groups. Pain scale values and the associated 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to describe efficacy. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of each means of pain control was calculated to compare the relative ranking of different interventions. Thirty-five eligible literatures were involved in data analysis. The interventions for postoperative pain management we examined were psoas compartment block (PCB), posterior nerve block (PNB), fascia iliaca block (FIB), periarticular injection (PAI), femoral nerve block (FNB), lumbar plexus block (LPB), spinal anesthesia (SA), epidural analgesia (EPI), intrathecal morphine (IA), intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), onsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), local infiltration analgaesia (LIA), and reverse LIA (rLIA). In 0 to 6 hours analysis, patients under SA were found to have significantly lower pain score and SA was ranked the best. In 6 to 12 hours analysis, SA was found to be significantly more effective than other interventions and its SUCRA was the highest. No intervention showed a significant effect on reducing pain score for 12 to 24 hours and 24 to 48 hours after THA. SA is the best intervention to reduce THA postoperative pain in the first 24 hours. LPB is a better choice to reduce pain 12 to 48 hours after THA.     

Chronic administration of clomipramine inhibits morphine hot plate analgesia

Clomipramine, chronically administered in mice, for 3 days, inhibits partially but significantly morphine analgesia in the hot plate test, when used at dose of 10 mg/kg/day, i.p.; 2.5 and 5 mg/kg/day were ineffective. Neither higher doses (20 and 40 mg/kg/day) nor longer duration of pretreatment (8 and 16 days) modified the intensity of this inhibition. Reduction in morphine analgesia was obtained after a 24h delay between the last injection of clomipramine and that of morphine (30 min before testing), while clomipramine did not induce any antinociceptive effect and clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine plasma and brain levels were low or undetectable. These results provide new evidence for the interaction between clomipramine and the endogenous opiate system. A pharmacokinetic interaction between clomipramine and morphine was excluded; involvement of change in opiate and 5 HT2 receptors by chronic administration of clomipramine is discussed.     

舒芬太尼在胆囊切除术后镇痛的临床效果观察

目的:探讨舒芬太尼在开腹胆囊切除术后病人自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)的效果和安全性。方法:60例全麻开腹胆囊切除术病人随机分为舒芬太尼(Suf)组和芬太尼(Fen)组,各30例。分别使用舒芬太尼或芬太尼进行PCIA,不给负荷量。记录术后0h、4h、12h、24h、40h各时间点的疼痛评分、镇静评分,PCA按压次数、并发症和病人的满意度等。结果:Suf组4h、12h、24hVAS评分明显低于Fen组(P<0.05),其它点差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Suf组各时间点镇静评分均小于Fen组(P<0.05);Suf组PCA按压次数显著低于Fen(P<0.05);两组并发症发生率无统计学差异(P>0.05);Suf组病人对PCIA满意率显著高于Fen组(P<0.05)。结论:舒芬太尼用于开腹胆囊切除术后PCIA,镇痛安全有效,镇痛镇静效果优于芬太尼。     

Exposure to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging procedure attenuates morphine-induced analgesia in mice

Adult male mice exposed to a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging (NMRI) procedure during the mid-dark period and injected with morphine (10 mg/kg) failed to exhibit the normal nocturnally enhanced morphine analgesia response to a thermal stimulus that was displayed by mice exposed to a sham imaging procedure and treated with morphine (p less than .01). When tested during the mid-light period, animals exposed to the NMRI procedure and given morphine displayed attenuated analgesia levels relative to sham exposed mice (p less than .01) treated with morphine. However, the morphine induced analgesia was not totally abolished since the imaged mice still exhibited analgesia relative to saline treated mice (p less than .01). These results suggest that the magnetic and/or radio-frequency fields associated with the NMRI procedure alter both day- and night-time responses to morphine. These results may reflect magnetic field induced alterations in neuronal calcium binding and/or alterations in nocturnal pineal gland activity.