Dynamics of Escherichia coli chromosome segregation during multifork replication

Slowly growing Escherichia coli cells have a simple cell cycle, with replication and progressive segregation of the chromosome completed before cell division. In rapidly growing cells, initiation of replication occurs before the previous replication rounds are complete. At cell division, the chromosomes contain multiple replication forks and must be segregated while this complex pattern of replication is still ongoing. Here, we show that replication and segregation continue in step, starting at the origin and progressing to the replication terminus. Thus, early-replicated markers on the multiple-branched chromosomes continue to separate soon after replication to form separate protonucleoids, even though they are not segregated into different daughter cells until later generations. The segregation pattern follows the pattern of chromosome replication and does not follow the cell division cycle. No extensive cohesion of sister DNA regions was seen at any growth rate. We conclude that segregation is driven by the progression of the replication forks.     

细胞周期检控点

细胞周期是高度有组织的时序调控过程,受到DNA损伤检控点、DNA复制检控点和纺锤体检控点等细胞周期检控点的精确调控。细胞周期检控点的作用主要是调节细胞周期的时序转换,以确保DNA复制、染色体分离等细胞重要生命活动的高度精确性,并对DNA损伤、DNA复制受阻、纺锤体组装和染色体分离异常等细胞损伤及时做出反应,以防止突变和遗传不稳定的发生。细胞周期检控点的功能缺陷,将导致细胞基因组的不稳定,与细胞癌变密切相关。因此细胞周期检控点对于维持细胞遗传信息的稳定性和完整性以及防止细胞癌变和遗传疾病的发生起着至关重要的作用。     

DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior

The DNA replication checkpoint maintains replication fork integrity and prevents chromosome segregation during replication stresses. Mec1 and Rad53 (human ATM/ATR- and Chk2-like kinases, respectively) are critical effectors of this pathway in yeast. When treated with replication inhibitors, checkpoint-deficient mec1 or rad53 mutant fails to maintain replication fork integrity and proceeds to partition unreplicated chromosomes. We show that this unnatural chromosome segregation requires neither the onset of mitosis nor APC activation, cohesin cleavage, or biorientation of kinetochores. Instead, the checkpoint deficiency leads to deregulation of microtubule-associated proteins Cin8 and Stu2, which, in the absence of both chromosome cohesion and bipolar attachment of kinetochores to microtubules, induce untimely spindle elongation, causing premature chromosome separation. The checkpoint's ability to prevent nuclear division is abolished by combined deficiency of microtubule-destabilizing motor Kip3 and Mad2 functions. Thus, the DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation, not by inhibiting entry into mitosis as widely believed, but by directly regulating spindle dynamics.     

The chromosome cycle of prokaryotes

In both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, chromosomal DNA undergoes replication, condensation–decondensation and segregation, sequentially, in some fixed order. Other conditions, like sister‐chromatid cohesion (SCC), may span several chromosomal events. One set of these chromosomal transactions within a single cell cycle constitutes the ‘chromosome cycle’. For many years it was generally assumed that the prokaryotic chromosome cycle follows major phases of the eukaryotic one: –replication–condensation–segregation–(cell division)–decondensation–, with SCC of unspecified length. Eventually it became evident that, in contrast to the strictly consecutive chromosome cycle of eukaryotes, all stages of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle run concurrently. Thus, prokaryotes practice ‘progressive’ chromosome segregation separated from replication by a brief SCC, and all three transactions move along the chromosome at the same fast rate. In other words, in addition to replication forks, there are ‘segregation forks’ in prokaryotic chromosomes. Moreover, the bulk of prokaryotic DNA outside the replication–segregation transition stays compacted. I consider possible origins of this concurrent replication–segregation and outline the ‘nucleoid administration’ system that organizes the dynamic part of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle.     

The Stringent Response and Cell Cycle Arrest in Escherichia coli

The bacterial stringent response, triggered by nutritional deprivation, causes an accumulation of the signaling nucleotides pppGpp and ppGpp. We characterize the replication arrest that occurs during the stringent response in Escherichia coli. Wild type cells undergo a RelA-dependent arrest after treatment with serine hydroxamate to contain an integer number of chromosomes and a replication origin-to-terminus ratio of 1. The growth rate prior to starvation determines the number of chromosomes upon arrest. Nucleoids of these cells are decondensed; in the absence of the ability to synthesize ppGpp, nucleoids become highly condensed, similar to that seen after treatment with the translational inhibitor chloramphenicol. After induction of the stringent response, while regions corresponding to the origins of replication segregate, the termini remain colocalized in wild-type cells. In contrast, cells arrested by rifampicin and cephalexin do not show colocalized termini, suggesting that the stringent response arrests chromosome segregation at a specific point. Release from starvation causes rapid nucleoid reorganization, chromosome segregation, and resumption of replication. Arrest of replication and inhibition of colony formation by ppGpp accumulation is relieved in seqA and dam mutants, although other aspects of the stringent response appear to be intact. We propose that DNA methylation and SeqA binding to non-origin loci is necessary to enforce a full stringent arrest, affecting both initiation of replication and chromosome segregation. This is the first indication that bacterial chromosome segregation, whose mechanism is not understood, is a step that may be regulated in response to environmental conditions.     

An analysis of the factory model for chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria

Recent advances in microscopy have given us important clues as to the nature of chromosome segregation in bacteria. Most current observations favour the view that the process is co-replicational: DNA replication forks are anchored at the cell centre, and the newly replicated DNA is moved towards the cell poles. This scheme can account for orderly segregation even at high growth rates where multiple replication cycles overlap. We argue that there are five distinct activities directly involved in co-replicational segregation dynamics. These we refer to as Push, Direct, Condense, Hold and Clear. We attempt to assign one of these roles to each protein implicated in chromosome segregation. The proposed process is very different from mitosis in eukaryotic cells and perhaps more closely resembles the formation of separate sister chromatids during DNA replication.     

A Highlights from MBoC Selection: Replication stress in early S phase generates apparent micronuclei and chromosome rearrangement in fission yeast

DNA replication stress causes genome mutations, rearrangements, and chromosome missegregation, which are implicated in cancer. We analyze a fission yeast mutant that is unable to complete S phase due to a defective subunit of the MCM helicase. Despite underreplicated and damaged DNA, these cells evade the G2 damage checkpoint to form ultrafine bridges, fragmented centromeres, and uneven chromosome segregations that resembles micronuclei. These micronuclei retain DNA damage markers and frequently rejoin with the parent nucleus. Surviving cells show an increased rate of mutation and chromosome rearrangement. This first report of micronucleus-like segregation in a yeast replication mutant establishes underreplication as an important factor contributing to checkpoint escape, abnormal chromosome segregation, and chromosome instability.     

Does the parallel evolution pattern between the replication-segregation proteins and HU have a biological significance?

The bacterial chromosome is a highly compacted nucleoproteic structure. Its apparent disordered morphology is difficult to conciliate with newly discovered mechanisms governing the propagation of genetic information between mother and daughter cells. Recent experiments in bacterial genetics, biochemistry and cytology from a number of laboratories are beginning to unravel how at each cell division, DNA replication and segregation proteins interact spatially with specific DNA motifs to orchestrate replication and movement of replication forks and chromosomes. We propose here a method to confirm and perhaps extend these experiments by in silico protein sequence comparisons and phylogeny. This analysis showed a parallel evolution between the histone-like protein HU and key protein factors involved in DNA replication and chromosome segregation.     

Rapid, transcription-independent loss of nucleosomes over a large chromatin domain at Hsp70 loci

Regulation of DNA replication and segregation is essential for all cells. Orthologs of the plasmid partitioning genes parA, parB, and parS are present in bacterial genomes throughout the prokaryotic evolutionary tree and are required for accurate chromosome segregation. However, the mechanism(s) by which parABS genes ensure proper DNA segregation have remained unclear. Here we report that the ParA ortholog in B. subtilis (Soj) controls the activity of the DNA replication initiator protein DnaA. Subcellular localization of several Soj mutants indicates that Soj acts as a spatially regulated molecular switch, capable of either inhibiting or activating DnaA. We show that the classical effect of Soj inhibiting sporulation is an indirect consequence of its action on DnaA through activation of the Sda DNA replication checkpoint. These results suggest that the pleiotropy manifested by chromosomal parABS mutations could be the indirect effects of a primary activity regulating DNA replication initiation.     

A moving DNA replication factory in Caulobacter crescentus

The in vivo intracellular location of components of the Caulobacter replication apparatus was visualized during the cell cycle. Replisome assembly occurs at the chromosomal origin located at the stalked cell pole, coincident with the initiation of DNA replication. The replisome gradually moves to midcell as DNA replication proceeds and disassembles upon completion of DNA replication. Although the newly replicated origin regions of the chromosome are rapidly moved to opposite cell poles by an active process, the replisome appears to be an untethered replication factory that is passively displaced towards the center of the cell by the newly replicated DNA. These results are consistent with a model in which unreplicated DNA is pulled into the replication factory and newly replicated DNA is bidirectionally extruded from the complex, perhaps contributing to chromosome segregation.     

Chromosome segregation

The ability to visualise specific genes and proteins within bacterial cells is revolutionising knowledge of chromosome segregation. The essential elements appear to be the driving force behind DNA replication, which occurs at fixed cellular positions, the condensation of newly replicated DNA by a chromosome condensation machine located at the cell 1/4 and 3/4 positions, and molecular machines that act at midcell to allow chromosome separation after replication and movement of the sister chromosomes away from the division septum prior to cell division. This review attempts to provide a perspective on current views of the bacterial chromosome segregation mechanism and how it relates to other cellular processes.     

Two separate DNA sequences within oriC participate in accurate chromosome segregation in Bacillus subtilis

Current views of bacterial chromosome segregation vary in respect of the likely presence or absence of an active segregation mechanism involving a mitotic-like apparatus. Furthermore, little is known about cis-acting elements for chromosome segregation in bacteria. In this report, we show that two separate DNA regions, a 3' coding region of dnaA and the AT-rich sequence between dnaA and dnaN (the initial opening site of duplex DNA during replication), are necessary for efficient segregation of the chromosome in Bacillus subtilis. When a plasmid replicon was integrated into argG, far from oriC, on the chromosome and then the oriC function was disrupted, the oriC-deleted mutant formed anucleate cells at 5% possibly because of defects in chromosome segregation. However, when the two DNA sequences were added near oriN, frequency of anucleate cells decreased to 1%. In these cells, the origin (argG) regions were localized near cell poles, whereas they were randomly distributed in cells without the two DNA sequences. These results suggest that the two DNA sequences in and downstream of the dnaA gene participate in correct positioning of the replication origin region within the cell and that this function is associated with accurate chromosome segregation in B. subtilis.     

A fixed distance for separation of newly replicated copies of oriC in Bacillus subtilis: implications for co-ordination of chromosome segregation and cell division

The Spo0J protein of Bacillus subtilis is required for normal chromosome segregation and forms discrete subcellular assemblies closely associated with the oriC region of the chromosome. Here we show that duplication of Spo0J foci occurs early in the DNA replication cycle and that this requires the initiation of DNA replication at oriC but not elongation beyond the nearby STer sites. Soon after duplication, sister oriC /Spo0J foci move rapidly apart to achieve a fixed separation of about 0.7 μm, reminiscent of the segregation of eukaryotic chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. The magnitude of the fixed separation distance may explain how chromosome segregation is kept in close register with cell growth and the initiation mass for DNA replication. It could also explain how segregation can proceed accurately in the absence of cell division. The kinetics of focal separation suggest that one role of Spo0J protein may be to facilitate formation of separate sister oriC complexes that can be segregated.     

Cell cycle and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

Recent work on cell division and chromosome orientation and partitioning in Bacillus subtilis has provided insights into cell cycle regulation during growth and development. The cell cycle is an integral part of development and entrance into sporulation is modulated by signals that transmit the status of DNA integrity, chromosome replication and segregation. In addition, B. subtilis modifies cell division and DNA segregation to establish cell-type-specific gene expression during sporulation.     

The MaoP/maoS Site-Specific System Organizes the Ori Region of the E. coli Chromosome into a Macrodomain

The Ori region of bacterial genomes is segregated early in the replication cycle of bacterial chromosomes. Consequently, Ori region positioning plays a pivotal role in chromosome dynamics. The Ori region of the E. coli chromosome is organized as a macrodomain with specific properties concerning DNA mobility, segregation of loci and long distance DNA interactions. Here, by using strains with chromosome rearrangements and DNA mobility as a read-out, we have identified the MaoP/maoS system responsible for constraining DNA mobility in the Ori region and limiting long distance DNA interactions with other regions of the chromosome. MaoP belongs to a group of proteins conserved in the Enterobacteria that coevolved with Dam methylase including SeqA, MukBEF and MatP that are all involved in the control of chromosome conformation and segregation. Analysis of DNA rings excised from the chromosome demonstrated that the single maoS site is required in cis on the chromosome to exert its effect while MaoP can act both in cis and in trans. The position of markers in the Ori region was affected by inactivating maoP. However, the MaoP/maoS system was not sufficient for positioning the Ori region at the ¼–¾ regions of the cell. We also demonstrate that the replication and the resulting expansion of bulk DNA are localized centrally in the cell. Implications of these results for chromosome positioning and segregation in E. coli are discussed.     

Bacterial DNA segregation: its motors and positional control

A model for DNA segregation in bacteria is proposed which involves not merely growth of the cell membrane and wall, as previously assumed, but also the active movement of one of the two chromosome sister origins by a DNA helicase enzyme and of the chromosome termini and the bulk of the chromosomes by supercoiling tension exerted by DNA gyrase. This provides a unified mechanism for DNA chromosome movement in prosthecate budding bacteria as well as for bacteria that undergo binary fission. The positional control of DNA segregation and the plane of cell division depend, I suggest, on four things: (1) the attachment of the daughter chromosome termini to the cell wall in a position adjacent to the new cell poles at about the time of septation, (2) the displacement of the parental chromosome terminus from this attachment site by the mobile origin, which attaches itself instead to the wall at that point, (3) the movement of the chromosome terminus to a new location in between the daughter origins by the tension of supercoiling, and (4) the determination of the location of the future septum at the position occupied by the chromosome terminus at the time of septal initiation; septum-initiation proteins are postulated to achieve this by binding directly or indirectly to the chromosome terminus. This mechanism automatically ensures ordered DNA segregation in rapidly growing bacteria with more than two sister origins of replication.     

Replication fork collisions cause pathological chromosomal amplification in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase

Duplication and transmission of chromosomes require precise control of chromosome replication and segregation. Here we present evidence that RecG is a major factor influencing these processes in bacteria. We show that the extensive DnaA-independent stable DNA replication observed without RecG can lead to replication of any area of the chromosome. This replication is further elevated following irradiation with UV light and appears to be perpetuated by secondary events that continue long after the elimination of UV lesions. The resulting pathological cascade is associated with an increased number of replication forks traversing the chromosome, sometimes with extensive regional amplification of the chromosome, and with the accumulation of highly branched DNA intermediates containing few Holliday junctions. We propose that the cascade is triggered by replication fork collisions that generate 3' single-strand DNA flaps, providing sites for PriA to initiate re-replication of the DNA and thus to generate linear duplexes that provoke recombination, allowing priming of even further replication. Our results shed light on why termination of replication in bacteria is normally limited to a single encounter of two forks and carefully orchestrated within a restricted area, and explain how a system of multiple forks and random termination can operate in eukaryotes.     

Replication fork passage drives asymmetric dynamics of a critical nucleoid‐associated protein in Caulobacter

In bacteria, chromosome dynamics and gene expression are modulated by nucleoid‐associated proteins (NAPs), but little is known about how NAP activity is coupled to cell cycle progression. Using genomic techniques, quantitative cell imaging, and mathematical modeling, our study in Caulobacter crescentus identifies a novel NAP (GapR) whose activity over the cell cycle is shaped by DNA replication. GapR activity is critical for cellular function, as loss of GapR causes severe, pleiotropic defects in growth, cell division, DNA replication, and chromosome segregation. GapR also affects global gene expression with a chromosomal bias from origin to terminus, which is associated with a similar general bias in GapR binding activity along the chromosome. Strikingly, this asymmetric localization cannot be explained by the distribution of GapR binding sites on the chromosome. Instead, we present a mechanistic model in which the spatiotemporal dynamics of GapR are primarily driven by the progression of the replication forks. This model represents a simple mechanism of cell cycle regulation, in which DNA‐binding activity is intimately linked to the action of DNA replication.