Integration of signals from receptor tyrosine kinases and g protein-coupled receptors

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) leads to stimulation of classical G protein signaling pathways. In addition, GPCRs can activate the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as the extracellular signal-regulated kinases, c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 MAPKs, and thereby influence cell proliferation, cell differentiation and mitogenesis. Cross talk between GPCRs and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is an incredibly complex process, and the exact signaling molecules involved are largely dependent on the cell type and the type of receptor that is activated. In this review we investigate recent advances that have been made in understanding the mechanisms of cross talk between GPCRs and RTKs, with a focus on GPCR-mediated activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway, GPCR-induced transactivation of RTKs, GPCR-mediated activation of JNK, and p38 MAPK, integration of signals by RhoGTPases, and activation of G protein signaling pathways by RTKs.     

G protein coupled growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase: no longer an oxymoron

Environmental cues are transmitted to the interior of the cell via a complex network of signaling hubs. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and trimeric G proteins are 2 such major signaling hubs in eukaryotes. Canonical signal transduction via trimeric G proteins is spatially and temporally restricted, i.e., triggered exclusively at the plasma membrane (PM) by agonist activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via a process that completes within a few hundred milliseconds. Recently, a rapidly emerging paradigm has revealed a non-canonical pathway for activation of trimeric G proteins by the non-receptor GEF, GIV/Girdin, that has distinctive temporal and spatial features. Such activation can be triggered by multiple growth factor RTKs, can occur at the PM and on internal membranes discontinuous with the PM, and can continue for prolonged periods of time. The molecular mechanisms that govern such non-canonical G protein activation and the relevance of this new paradigm in health and disease is discussed.     

The G protein G alpha(13) is required for growth factor-induced cell migration

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical cellular signal transducers. They are known to directly relay signals from seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to downstream effectors. On the other hand, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), a different family of membrane receptors, signal through docking sites in their carboxy-terminal tails created by autophosphorylated tyrosine residues. Here we show that a heterotrimeric G protein, G alpha(13), is essential for RTK-induced migration of mouse fibroblast and endothelial cells. G alpha(13) activity in cell migration is retained in a C-terminal mutant that is defective in GPCR coupling, suggesting that the migration function is independent of GPCR signaling. Thus, G alpha(13) appears to be a critical signal transducer for RTKs as well as GPCRs. This broader role of G alpha(13) in cell migration initiated by two types of receptors could provide a molecular basis for the vascular system defects exhibited by G alpha(13) knockout mice.     

Molecular mechanisms involved in epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated inhibition of dopamine D3 receptor signaling

The phenomenon wherein the signaling by a given receptor is regulated by a different class of receptors is termed transactivation or crosstalk. Crosstalk between receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is highly diverse and has unique functional implications because of the distinct structural features of the receptors and the signaling pathways involved. The present study used the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and dopamine D₃ receptor (D₃R), which are both associated with schizophrenia, as the model system to study crosstalk between RTKs and GPCRs. Loss-of-function approaches were used to identify the cellular components involved in the tyrosine phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), which is responsible for EGFR-induced regulation of the functions of D₃R. SRC proto-oncogene (Src, non-receptor tyrosine kinase), heterotrimeric G protein Gβγ subunit, and endocytosis of EGFR were involved in the tyrosine phosphorylation of GRK2. In response to EGF treatment, Src interacted with EGFR in a Gβγ-dependent manner, resulting in the endocytosis of EGFR. Internalized EGFR in the cytosol mediated Src/Gβγ-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of GRK2. The binding of tyrosine-phosphorylated GRK2 to the T142 residue of D₃R resulted in uncoupling from G proteins, endocytosis, and lysosomal downregulation. This study identified the molecular mechanisms involved in the EGFR-mediated regulation of the functions of D₃R, which can be extended to the crosstalk between other RTKs and GPCRs.     

Regulation of MAP kinase activity by peptide receptor signalling pathway: paradigms of multiplicity

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade and thereby induce cellular proliferation like receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Work over the past 5 years has established several models which reduce the links of G(i)-, G(q)-, and G(s)-coupled receptors to MAPK on few principle pathways. They include (i) Ras-dependent activation of MAPK via transactivation of RTKs such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), (ii) Ras-independent MAPK activation via protein kinase C (PKC) that converges with the RTK signalling at the level of Raf, and (iii) activation as well as inactivation of MAPK via the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway in dependency on the type of Raf. Most of these generalizing hypotheses are founded on experimental data obtained from expression studies and using a limited set of individual receptors. This review will compare these models with pathways to MAPK found for a great variety of peptide hormone and neuropeptide receptor subtypes in various cells. It becomes evident that under endogenous conditions, the transactivation pathway is less dominant as postulated, whereas pathways involving isoforms of PKC and, especially, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI-3K) appear to play a more important role as assumed so far. Highly cell-specific and unusual connections of signalling proteins towards MAPK, in particular tumour cells, might provide points of attacks for new therapeutic concepts.     

Resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase-8A (Ric-8A) is critical for growth factor receptor-induced actin cytoskeletal reorganization

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical transducers of cellular signaling. In addition to their classic roles in relaying signals from G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), heterotrimeric G proteins also mediate physiological functions from non-GPCRs. Previously, we have shown that Gα(13), a member of the heterotrimeric G proteins, is essential for growth factor receptor-induced actin cytoskeletal reorganization such as dynamic dorsal ruffle turnover and cell migration. These Gα(13)-mediated dorsal ruffle turnover and cell migration by growth factors acting on their receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are independent of GPCRs. However, the mechanism by which RTKs signal to Gα(13) is not known. Here, we show that cholinesterase-8A (Ric-8A), a nonreceptor guanine nucleotide exchange factor for some heterotrimeric G proteins, is critical for coupling RTKs to Gα(13). Down-regulation of Ric-8A protein levels in cells by RNA interference slowed down platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced dorsal ruffle turnover and inhibited PDGF-initiated cell migration. PDGF was able to increase the activity of Ric-8A in cells. Furthermore, purified Ric-8A proteins interact directly with purified Gα(13) protein in a nucleotide-dependent manner. Deficiency of Ric-8A prevented the translocation of Gα(13) to the cell cortex. Hence, Ric-8A is critical for growth factor receptor-induced actin cytoskeletal reorganization.     

The GAPs,GEFs, GDIs and…now,GEMs: New kids on the heterotrimeric G protein signaling block

The canonical process of activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is well studied. Recently, a rapidly emerging paradigm has revealed the existence of a new, non-canonical set of cytosolic G protein modulators, guanine exchange modulators (GEMs). Among G proteins regulators, GEMs are uniquely capable of initiating pleiotropic signals: these bifunctional modulators can activate cAMP inhibitory (Gi) proteins and inhibit cAMP-stimulatory (Gs) proteins through a single short evolutionarily conserved module. A prototypical member of the GEM family, GIV/Girdin, integrates signals downstream of a myriad of cell surface receptors, e.g., growth factor RTKs, integrins, cytokine, GPCRs, etc., and translates these signals into G protein activation or inhibition. By their pleiotropic action, GIV and other GEMs modulate several key pathways within downstream signaling network. Unlike canonical G protein signaling that is finite and is triggered directly and exclusively by GPCRs, the temporal and spatial features of non-canonical activation of G protein via GIV-family of cytosolic GEMs are unusually relaxed. GIV uses this relaxed circuitry to integrate, reinforce and compartmentalize signals downstream of both growth factors and G proteins in a way that enables it to orchestrate cellular phenotypes in a sustained manner. Mounting evidence suggests the importance of GIV and other GEMs as disease modulators and their potential to serve as therapeutic targets; however, a lot remains unknown within the layers of the proverbial onion that must be systematically peeled. This perspective summarizes the key concepts of the GEM-dependent G protein signaling paradigm and discusses the multidisciplinary approaches that are likely to revolutionize our understanding of this paradigm from the atomic level to systems biology.     

Activation and targeting of mitogen-activated protein kinases by G-protein-coupled receptors

Over the past decade, it has become apparent that many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) generate signals that control cellular differentiation and growth, including stimulation of Ras family GTPases and activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways. The mechanisms that GPCRs use to control the activity of MAP kinases vary between receptor and cell type but fall broadly into one of three categories: signals initiated by classical G protein effectors, e.g., protein kinase (PK)A and PKC, signals initiated by cross-talk between GPCRs and classical receptor tyrosine kinases, e.g., "transactivation" of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, and signals initiated by direct interaction between beta-arrestins and components of the MAP kinase cascade, e.g., beta-arrestin "scaffolds". While each of these pathways results in increased cellular MAP kinase activity, emerging data suggest that they are not functionally redundant. MAP kinase activation occurring via PKC-dependent pathways and EGF receptor transactivation leads to nuclear translocation of the kinase and stimulates cell proliferation, while MAP kinase activation via beta-arrestin scaffolds primarily increases cytosolic kinase activity. By controlling the spatial and temporal distribution of MAP kinase activity within the cell, the consequences of GPCR-stimulated MAP kinase activation may be determined by the mechanism by which they are activated.     

GPCRs and EGFR – Cross-talk of membrane receptors in cancer

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor-tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are two important classes of cell surface receptors proven to be highly tractable as drug targets. Both receptor classes are involved in various complex (patho-) physiological processes in the human body including cellular growth and differentiation. More recently, accumulating data suggest that GPCR-induced activation of EGFR, the prototyp of RTKs represents a major mechanism in various cancers. The present review will focus on this cross-talk with particular emphasis on intracellular scaffold proteins regulating EGFR transactivation. It will give an overview about the current status of the research and future directions, highlight recent trends in the field, and discuss the potential of therapeutic strategies combining GPCR and EGFR targeting on the one hand and specific targeting of the cross-talk on the other hand in cancer therapy.     

G protein-coupled receptor-induced sensitization of phospholipase C stimulation by receptor tyrosine kinases

Activation of stably expressed M(2) and M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) as well as of endogenously expressed lysophosphatidic acid and purinergic receptors in HEK-293 cells can induce a long lasting potentiation of phospholipase C (PLC) stimulation by these and other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we report that GPCRs can induce an up-regulation of PLC stimulation by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) as well and provide essential mechanistic characteristics of this sensitization process. Pretreatment of HEK-293 cells for 2 min with carbachol, a mAChR agonist, lysophosphatidic acid, or ATP, followed by agonist washout, strongly increased (by 2-3-fold) maximal PLC stimulation (measured >/=40 min later) by epidermal growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor, but not insulin, and largely enhanced PLC sensitivity to these RTK agonists. The up-regulation of RTK-induced PLC stimulation was cycloheximide-insensitive and was observed for up to approximately 90 min after removal of the GPCR agonist. Sensitization of receptor-induced PLC stimulation caused by prior M(2) mAChR activation was fully prevented by pertussis toxin and strongly reduced by expression of Gbetagamma scavengers. Furthermore, inhibition of conventional protein kinase C (PKC) isoenzymes and chelation of intracellular Ca(2+) suppressed the sensitization process, while overexpression of PKC-alpha, but not PKC-betaI, further enhanced the M(2) mAChR-induced sensitization of PLC stimulation. None of these treatments affected acute PLC stimulation by either GPCR or RTK agonists. Taken together, short term activation of GPCRs can induce a strong and long lasting sensitization of PLC stimulation by RTKs, a process apparently involving G(i)-derived Gbetagammas as well as increases in intracellular Ca(2+) and activation of a PKC isoenzyme, most likely PKC-alpha.     

Sphingosine 1-phosphate transactivates c-Met as well as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in human gastric cancer cells

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are transactivated by the stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a ligand of GPCR, is known as a tumor-promoting lipid, but its signaling pathways are not fully understood. We here demonstrated that S1P induces rapid and transient tyrosine phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-Met in gastric cancer cells, both of which have been proposed as prognostic markers of gastric cancers. The pathway of S1P-induced c-Met transactivation is Gi-independent and matrix metalloproteinase-independent, which differs from that of EGFR transactivation. Our results indicate that S1P acts upstream of various RTKs and thus may act as a potent stimulator of gastric cancer.     

Mechanisms of extracellularly regulated kinases 1/2 activation in adrenal glomerulosa cells by lysophosphatidic acid and epidermal growth factor

The regulation of adrenal function, including aldosterone production from adrenal glomerulosa cells, is dependent on a variety of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). In many cell types, GPCR-mediated MAPK activation is mediated through transactivation of RTKs, in particular the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGF-R). However, the extent to which this cross-communication between GPCRs and RTKs is operative in the adrenal glomerulosa has not been defined. Bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells express receptors for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and EGF. In cultured bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells, LPA, which is predominantly coupled to Gi and partially to Gq/protein kinase C alpha and epsilon, caused phosphorylation of Src (at Tyr416), proline-rich tyrosine kinase (Pyk2 at Tyr402), EGF-R, protein kinase B/Akt, extracellularly regulated signal kinases 1/2, and their dependent protein, p90 ribosomal S6 kinase. Overexpression of dominant negative mutants of Ras or EGF-R, and selective inhibition of EGF-R kinase with AG1478, significantly reduced LPA-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. However, this was not impaired by inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and heparin-binding EGF. LPA-induced ERK1/2 activation occurs predominantly through EGF-R transactivation by Gi/Src and partly through activation of protein kinase C, which acts downstream of EGF-R and Ras. In contrast, LPA-induced phosphorylation of Shc and ERK1/2 in clonal hepatocytes (C9 cells) was primarily mediated through MMP-dependent transactivation of the EGF-R. These observations in adrenal glomerulosa and hepatic cells demonstrate that LPA phosphorylates ERK1/2 through EGF-R transactivation in a MMP-dependent or -independent manner in individual target cells. This reflects the ability of GPCRs expressed in cell lines and neoplastic cells to utilize distinct signaling pathways that can elicit altered responses compared with those of native tissues.     

Integrins regulate the linkage between upstream and downstream events in G protein-coupled receptor signaling to mitogen-activated protein kinase

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can both activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), a critical intermediate in the transduction of proliferative signals. Numerous observations have demonstrated that integrin-mediated cell anchorage can regulate the efficiency of signaling from RTKs to MAPK. Recently, a relationship between integrins and GPCR signaling has also emerged; however, little is understood concerning the mechanisms involved. Here, we investigate integrin regulation of GPCR signaling to MAPK, focusing on the P2Y class of GPCRs that function through activation of phospholipase Cbeta. P2Y receptor signaling to the downstream components mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase and MAPK is highly dependent on integrin-mediated cell anchorage. However, activation of upstream events, including inositol phosphate production and generation of calcium transients, is completely independent of cell anchorage. This indicates that integrins regulate the linkage between upstream and downstream events in this GPCR pathway, just as they do in some aspects of RTK signaling. However, the P2Y pathway does not involve cross-activation of a RTK, nor a role for Shc or c-Raf; thus, it is quite distinct from the classical RTK-Ras-Raf-MAPK cascade. Rather, integrin-modulated P2Y receptor stimulation of MAPK depends on calcium and on the activation of protein kinase C.     

Pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive thrombin stimulation of Shc phosphorylation and mitogenesis are mediated through distinct pathways

Activation of both receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) result in phosphorylation of the adaptor protein Shc, providing sites of interaction for proteins in downstream signal transduction cascades. The mechanism of Shc phosphorylation and its function in G protein signaling pathways is still unclear. By examining Shc phosphorylation in response to thrombin in two cell lines, we have defined distinct pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive and -insensitive mechanisms by which GPCRs can stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc. By mutating the tyrosines in Shc, we show that the three sites of tyrosine phosphorylation, Y239, Y240, and Y317, are necessary for thrombin signaling in both systems. The SH2 (src homology 2) domain of Shc is also critical for signaling, but not required for phosphorylation of Shc. In both cell types, inhibition of src family member kinases by chemical inhibitors or microinjection block Shc phosphorylation and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation in response to thrombin. However, in the PTX-sensitive thrombin pathway, both betagamma function and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are necessary for Shc phosphorylation and BrdU incorporation. In contrast, signaling in the PTX-insensitive pathway is not mediated through betagamma or the EGFR. Thus, while phosphorylation and function of Shc appear to be the same in both thrombin pathways, the mechanism of tyrosine kinase activation proximal to Shc is different. The differences in signaling between the two thrombin pathways may be representative of mechanisms used by other PTX-sensitive and -insensitive GPCRs to mediate specific responses. In addition, transactivation of RTKs may be a manner by which GPCRs can amplify their signal.     

Activation of EphA receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits the Ras/MAPK pathway

Interactions between Eph receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and membrane-anchored ephrin ligands critically regulate axon pathfinding and development of the cardiovascular system, as well as migration of neural cells. Similar to other RTKs, ligand-activated Eph kinases recruit multiple signalling and adaptor proteins, several of which are involved in growth regulation. However, in contrast to other RTKs, activation of Eph receptors fails to promote cell proliferation or to transform rodent fibroblasts, indicating that Eph kinases may initiate signalling pathways that are distinct from those transmitted by other RTKs. Here we show that stimulation of endogenous EphA kinases with ephrin-A1 potently inhibits the Ras/MAPK cascade in a range of cell types, and attenuates activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) by receptors for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In prostatic epithelial cells and endothelial cells, but not fibroblasts, treatment with ephrin-A1 inhibits cell proliferation. Our results identify EphA kinases as negative regulators of the Ras/MAPK pathway that exert anti-mitogenic functions in a cell-type-specific manner.     

Protein tyrosine kinase-mediated pathways in G protein-coupled receptor signaling

Abundant evidence has indicated that protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) convey signals from G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to regulate cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, and potentialy cellular transformation. Molecular mechanisms by which PTKs regulate such diverse effects in GPCR signaling are not well understood. Recently, an unifying theme has emerged where both growth factors and GPCRs utilize protein tyrosine kinase activity and the highly conserved Ras/MAP kinase pathway to control mitogenic signals. Additionally, PTKs are also involved in the regulation of signal transmission from GPCRs to activation of the JNK/SAPK kinase pathway. Furthermore novel insights in chemokine receptor-activated PTKs and their role in mediating cell functions are discussed in this review.     

Moonlighting characteristics of G protein-coupled receptors: focus on receptor heteromers and relevance for neurodegeneration

It is proposed that the moonlighting concept can be applied to G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) as, obviously, they can carry out different types of functions. The same motifs in, for example, the third intracellular loop, can moonlight by switching between receptor-receptor interactions and interactions with signaling proteins such as G proteins or calmodulin. A "guide-and-clasp" manner of receptor-receptor interactions has been proposed where the "adhesive guides" may be the triplet homologies. As an example, the triplets AAR (or RAA) and AAE (or EAA) homologies in A(2A) R-D2 R heteromers may guide-and-clasp binding not only of the two protomers but also of calmodulin and G(i) . A beautiful moonlighting phenomenon in the A(2A) R-D2 R heteromer is that the positively charged D2 R N-terminal third intracellular loop epitope (VLRRRRKRVN) may switch between bindings to the negatively charged A(2A) R epitope (SAQEpSQGNT), localized in the medium segment of the C terminus of the A2A receptor to several negative epitopes of calmodulin. Furthermore, overlapping motifs may favor moonlighting to G(i/o) via inter alia electrostatic interaction between triplets AAR(in D2 R third intracellular loop) and AAE (G(i/alpha1) ) (and/or their symmetric variants) contributing to guide-and-clasp D2 R-G(i) interactions Thus, moonlighting in GPCR heteromers can take place via allosteric receptor-receptor interactions and is also described in D1 R-D2 R, D2 R-5-HT2 R,and A1 R-P2Y1 heteromers. Allosteric receptor-receptor interactions in GPCR-receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) heteromers and postulated ion channel receptor-RTK heteromers-like, for example, AMPA-NMDA-TrkB heteromers may lead to moonlighting of the participating GPCR and RTK protomers altering, for example, the pattern of the five major signaling pathways of the RTKs favoring MAPK and/or mTOR signaling with high relevance for neurodegenerative processes and depression induced atrophy of neurons. Moonlighting may also develop in the intracellular loops and C-terminal of the GPCRs as a result of dynamic allosteric interactions between different types of G proteins and other receptor interacting proteins in these domains of the receptor.     

G protein-mediated stretch reception

Mechanosensation and -transduction are important for physiological processes like the senses of touch, hearing, and balance. The mechanisms underlying the translation of mechanical stimuli into biochemical information by activating various signaling pathways play a fundamental role in physiology and pathophysiology but are only poorly understood. Recently, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are essential for the conversion of light, olfactory and gustatory stimuli, as well as of primary messengers like hormones and neurotransmitters into cellular signals and which play distinct roles in inflammation, cell growth, and differentiation, have emerged as potential mechanosensors. The first candidate for a mechanosensitive GPCR was the angiotensin-II type-1 (AT(1)) receptor. Agonist-independent mechanical receptor activation of AT(1) receptors induces an active receptor conformation that appears to differ from agonist-induced receptor conformations and entails the activation of G proteins. Mechanically induced AT(1) receptor activation plays an important role for myogenic vasoconstriction and for the initiation of cardiac hypertrophy. A growing body of evidence suggests that other GPCRs are involved in mechanosensation as well. These findings highlight physiologically relevant, ligand-independent functions of GPCRs and add yet another facet to the polymodal activation spectrum of this ubiquitous protein family.