Sialic acid is selectively involved in the interaction of agonists with M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Neuraminidase and slight acid hydrolysis were used to investigate the role of sialic acid residues in the binding of muscarinic agonists and antagonists to membranes from tissues rich in M1 and M2 receptors. Membranes were pretreated with neuraminidase at pH 5 and the binding parameters were determined from competitive experiments with (3H)-quinuclidinylbenzylate. The removal of sialic acid residues reduced the affinity of muscarinic agonists for cerebellum, heart and lung membranes (M2), in contrast to striatum (M1). The affinity of antagonists was not affected. Thus, sialic acid is selectively involved in the interaction of agonists with M2 muscarinic receptors.     

Design, synthesis and binding at cloned muscarinic receptors of N-[5-(1'-substituted-acetoxymethyl)-3-oxadiazolyl] and N-[4-(1'-substituted-acetoxymethyl)-2-dioxolanyl] dialkyl amines

Few muscarinic antagonists differentiate between the M4 and M2 muscarinic receptors. In a structure activity study, aimed at discovering leads for the development of a M4 muscarinic receptor-selective antagonist, we have synthesized and tested at cloned muscarinic receptors the binding of a group of dioxolane- or oxadiazole-dialkyl amines, and compared them to our compound 1, which contains the furan nucleus. Although none of these agents were particularly potent at M4 receptors (Kd values were typically 30-70 nM), furan derivatives (-)1 and (+)1 were significantly more potent at M4 receptors than at M2 receptors (approximately 3- and 4-fold, respectively). The dioxolane derivatives 12b and 12c were more than 10-fold selective for the M4 versus the M2 receptors, while the dioxolane derivative 12e was 15-fold more potent at M4 receptors than for M2 receptors. However, these agents bound to M3 receptors with potencies like that for the M4 receptor, so they are not M4-selective. The M4/M2 relative selectivities of some of our compounds are similar to the better hexahydrosiladifenidol derivatives, and may provide some important structural clues for the development of potent and selective M4 antagonists.     

Identification, localization and classification of muscarinic receptor subtypes in the gut

Muscarinic receptors in the gastrointestinal tract are present on enteric neurons, presynaptic and prejunctional axonal endings, intramural endocrine cells as well as directly on effector cells such as smooth muscle and glandular and epithelial cells. Neural M1 stimulatory receptors are present on myenteric and submucous neurons, while neural M2 inhibitory receptors are present on their axonal endings. Muscle M2 and glandular M2 receptors are stimulatory. Functional and ligand binding studies show that there is heterogeneity among different muscarinic receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. The neural M1 muscle M2 and glandular M2 receptors are distinct from each other, but presynaptic and prejunctional M2 receptors appear to be similar to muscle M2 receptors. The relationship of the gut muscarinic receptors to the structurally-defined muscarinic receptors in the brain is unclear. However, they appear to be different from cardiac M2 and brain M2 receptors.     

Pharmacological characterization of a novel muscarinic partial agonist, YM796, in transfected cells expressing the m1 or m2 muscarinic receptor gene.

To investigate the pharmacological effect of a novel compound YM796, we performed radioligand binding experiments and correlative biochemical experiments using the transfected murine fibroblast B82 cells which expressed the m1 and m2 muscarinic receptor genes (cloned cell lines designated as LK3-3 and M2LKB2-2, respectively). [3H](-)methyl-3-quinuclidinyl benzilate [( 3H](-)MQNB) binding in these transfected cell lines was inhibited by different optical isomers of YM796 and other muscarinic drugs, atropine, pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, as well as selected agonists. (-)YM796, (+)YM796 and (+/-)YM796 inhibited [3H](-)MQNB binding in LK3-3 cells with Ki values of 16.4 microM, 30.1 microM and 21.8 microM and in M2LKB2-2 cells with Ki values of 52.0 microM, 108 microM and 77.1 microM, respectively. From functional assays we found the two isomers, (-)YM796 and (+)YM796 had different intrinsic activities for the M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors. (-)YM796 revealed agonistic activity: stimulation of [3H]IP1 accumulation in LK3-3 cells with an EC50 value of 26.5 microM, which was less efficacious (the Emax value was 5.6 times basal) than carbachol, a full agonist (the Emax value was 17.2 times basal). Interestingly, (-)YM796 did not show significant inhibition of cAMP formation in M2LKB2-2 cells except at extremely high concentrations (greater than 1mM). (+)YM796 exhibited no significant efficacy for the M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors. These results suggest that (-)YM796 represents a muscarinic partial agonist with functional selectivity for the M1 muscarinic receptors whereas (+)YM796 shows no efficacy for either M1 or M2 muscarinic receptors in these transfected cells.     

Stereoselectivity of (R)- and (S)-hexahydro-difenidol binding to neuroblastoma M1, cardiac M2, pancreatic M3, and striatum M4 muscarinic receptors

(R)-Hexahydro-difenidol has a higher affinity for M1 receptors in NB-OK 1 cells, pancreas M3 and striatum M4 receptors (pKi 7.9 to 8.3) than for cardiac M2 receptors (pKi 7.0). (S)-Hexahydro-difenidol, by contrast, is nonselective (pKi 5.8 to 6.1). Our goal in the present study was to evaluate the importance of the hydrophobic phenyl, and cyclohexyl rings of hexahydro-difenidol for the stereoselectivity and receptor selectivity of hexahydro-difenidol binding to the four muscarinic receptors. Our results indicated that replacement of the phenyl ring of hexahydro-difenidol by a cyclohexyl group (----dicyclidol) and of the cyclohexyl ring by a phenyl moiety (----difenidol) induced a large (4- to 80-fold) decrease in binding affinity for all muscarinic receptors. Difenidol had a significant preference for M1, M3, and M4 over M2 receptors; dicyclidol, by contrast, had a greater affinity for M1 and M4 than for M2 and M3 receptors. The binding free energy decrease due to replacement of the phenyl and the cyclohexyl groups of (R)-hexahydro-difenidol by, respectively, a cyclohexyl and a phenyl moiety was almost additive in the case of M4 (striatum) binding sites. In the case of the cardiac M2, pancreatic M3, or NB-OK 1 M1 receptors the respective binding free energies were not completely additive. These results suggest that the four (R)-hexahydro-difenidol "binding moieties" (phenyl, cyclohexyl, hydroxy, and protonated amino group) cannot simultaneously form optimal interactions with the M1, M2, and M3 muscarinic receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of pirenzepine analogs bearing a 1,2-cyclohexanediamine and perhydroquinoxaline units in exchange for the piperazine ring as antimuscarinics

Pirenzepine (2) is one of the most selective muscarinic M(1) versus M(2) receptor antagonists known. A series of 2 analogs, in which the piperazyl moiety was replaced by a cis- and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (3-6) or a trans- and cis-perhydroquinoxaline rings (7 and 8) were prepared, with the aim to investigate the role of the piperazine ring of 2 in the interaction with the muscarinic receptors. The structural change leading to compounds 3-6 abolished in binding assays the muscarinic M(1)/M(2) selectivity of 2, due to an increased M(2) affinity. Rather, compounds 3-6 displayed a reversed selectivity showing more affinity at the muscarinic M(2) receptor than at all the other subtypes tested.     

No change in cortical muscarinic M2, M3 receptors or [35S]GTPgammaS binding in schizophrenia

Muscarinic M1, but not M4, receptors have been shown to be decreased in Brodmann's area (BA) 9 obtained postmortem from subjects with schizophrenia. This study extends that data by measuring levels of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor protein and mRNAs in BA 9 and BA 40 from the same cohorts of subjects used in the study of M1 and M4 receptors. In addition, the ability of carbachol to stimulate muscarinic receptors that signal through the Gi/o G-proteins was measured in BA 9 from the same cohorts of subjects. There were no changes in levels of muscarinic M2 or M3 protein or M3 mRNA with diagnosis in either CNS region. M2 receptor mRNA could not be detected in BA 9 or BA 40. Finally, carbachol-stimulated GTPgammaS binding did not differ between the diagnostic cohorts in BA 9 (p = 0.64). These data add considerable weight to the argument that the muscarinic M1 receptor is the muscarinic receptor predominantly affected in BA 9 by the pathology of schizophrenia. Given the widespread changes in muscarinic receptors identified in the CNS of subjects of schizophrenia using functional neuroimaging it remains possible that receptors other than the M1 receptor may be altered in different CNS regions.     

Identification of three muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat lung using binding studies with selective antagonists

Heterogeneity of the muscarinic receptor population in the rat central and peripheral lung was found in competition binding experiments against [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate [( 3H]QNB) using the selective antagonists pirenzepine, AF-DX 116 and hexahydrosiladifenidol (HHSiD). Pirenzepine displaced [3H]QNB with low affinity from preparations of central airways indicating the absence of M1 receptors in the trachea and bronchi. Muscarinic receptors in the central airways are comprised of both M2 and M3 receptors since AF-DX 116, an M2-selective antagonist, bound with high affinity to 70% of the available sites while HHSiD, an M3-selective antagonist bound with high affinity to the remaining binding sites. In the peripheral lung, pirenzepine bound with high affinity to 14% of the receptor population, AF-DX 116 bound with high affinity to 79% of the binding sites while HHSiD bound with high affinity to 18% of the binding sites. The presence of M1 receptors in the peripheral airways but not in the central airways was confirmed using [3H]telenzepine, an M1 receptor ligand. [3H]Telenzepine showed specific saturable binding to 8% of [3H]QNB labeled binding sites in homogenates of rat peripheral lung, while there was no detectable specific binding in homogenates of rat trachea or heart. The results presented here demonstrate that there are three muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat lungs, and that the distribution of the different subtypes varies within the lungs. Throughout the airways, the dominant muscarinic receptor subtype is M2. In the trachea and bronchi the remaining receptors are M3, while in the peripheral lungs, the remaining receptors are both M1 and M3.     

The conformational and property space of acetylcholine bound to muscarinic receptors: an entropy component accounts for the subtype selectivity of acetylcholine

The conformational behavior of receptor-bound acetylcholine (ACh) was investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Based on the great similarity among muscarinic receptors, the study was focused on the human M(1), M(2), and M(5) receptors as previously modeled by us. The results showed that receptor-bound ACh was not frozen in a single preferred conformation but preserved an unexpected fraction of its conformational space. However, there were marked differences between the three receptors since the ligand was mostly trans in the M(1) receptor, equally distributed among trans and gauche conformers in M(2), and exclusively gauche in the M(5); the greater flexibility of M(2)-bound ACh was paralleled by the greater flexibility of the occupied M(2) binding site. By contrast, the property space of receptor-bound ACh, and particularly its virtual (computed, conformation-dependent) lipophilicity, was restricted to relatively narrow ranges optimal for successful interaction. Experimental binding investigations to the individual human M(1), M(2), and M(5) muscarinic receptors showed ACh to have a 10-fold higher affinity for the M(2) compared to the M(1) and M(5) receptors. This selectivity was not confirmed by the calculated binding scores, a fact postulated to be caused by the absence of an entropy component in such binding scores. Indeed, the Shannon entropy of all geometric and physicochemical properties monitored were markedly higher in M(2)-bound ACh compared to M(1)-bound and M(5)-bound ACh. This finding suggests that the selectivity profile of acetylcholine for the M(2) receptor is largely entropy-driven, a fact that might explain the intrinsic difficulty to design subtype-selective muscarinic agonists.     

Structure-activity relationships of methoctramine-related polyamines as muscarinic antagonist: effect of replacing the inner polymethylene chain with cyclic moieties

The aim of the present paper was to investigate the role of the octamethylene spacer of methoctramine (1) on the biological profile. Thus, this spacer was incorporated into a dianiline or dipiperidine moiety to determine whether flexibility and the basicity of the inner nitrogen atoms are important determinants of potency with respect to muscarinic receptors. The most potent compound was 4, which displayed, in the functional assays, a comparable potency at muscarinic M(2) receptors with respect to 1, and, in the binding assays, a loss of potency and selectivity toward muscarinic M(1) and M(3) receptor subtypes. Both compounds were endowed with antinociceptive activity. Furthermore, in microdialysis tests in rat parietal cortex, they enhanced acetylcholine release, most likely by antagonizing presynaptic muscarinic receptor subtypes.     

In vivo demonstration of M3 muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity of darifenacin in mice

A novel muscarinic receptor antagonist, darifenacin, inhibited specific binding of [N-methyl-(3)H]scopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) in the mouse bladder, submaxillary gland and heart in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect was most potent in the submaxillary gland, followed by the bladder and heart. In addition, darifenacin inhibited specific [(3)H]NMS binding in the membranes of CHO-K1 cell lines expressing muscarinic M(2) and M(3) receptor subtypes, and the potency was significantly (22-fold) greater at the M(3) than at the M(2) subtype. At 0.5 to 12 h after oral administration of darifenacin, a significant increase in K(d) values for specific [(3)H]NMS binding was seen in the bladder, submaxillary gland and lung of mice, compared with control values. Also, there was a sustained decrease in the B(max) values in the submaxillary gland. These data suggest that muscarinic receptor binding of oral darifenacin is rapid in onset and of a long duration. On the other hand, oral darifenacin exerted only temporary or little binding of muscarinic receptors in the heart and colon. Pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion in mice was continuously suppressed by oral darifenacin. The time-course of suppression coincided well with that for the muscarinic receptor binding in the submaxillary gland. The antagonistic effect of darifenacin against the dose-response curves for pilocarpine appeared to be insurmountable. In conclusion, the present study has shown that oral darifenacin may exert a pronounced and long-lasting binding of muscarinic receptors in tissues expressing the M(3) subtype.     

Cholinergic binding in the hippocampus of the aging male rat

1. M1 muscarinic (3H-pirenzepine) and 3H-L-nicotine binding were measured in the hippocampus of male Wistar rats aged 3-4, 10-11 and 24-25 months. 2. The maximal number of M1 binding sites did not differ between age groups. 3. The dissociation constant of M1 binding was higher in old rats than in young rats. 4. The binding of 3H-L-nicotine did not differ between age groups. 5. The number of postsynaptic muscarinic receptors may be preserved, but the conformation of these receptors in the rat hippocampus may be altered during aging.     

Enhanced muscarinic M1 receptor gene expression in the corpus striatum of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Acetylcholine (ACh), the first neurotransmitter to be identified, regulate the activities of central and peripheral functions through interactions with muscarinic receptors. Changes in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of many major diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). Previous reports from our laboratory on streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats showed down regulation of muscarinic M1 receptors in the brainstem, hypothalamus, cerebral cortex and pancreatic islets. In this study, we have investigated the changes of acetylcholine esterase (AChE) enzyme activity, total muscarinic and muscarinic M1 receptor binding and gene expression in the corpus striatum of STZ – diabetic rats and the insulin treated diabetic rats. The striatum, a neuronal nucleus intimately involved in motor behaviour, is one of the brain regions with the highest acetylcholine content. ACh has complex and clinically important actions in the striatum that are mediated predominantly by muscarinic receptors. We observed that insulin treatment brought back the decreased maximal velocity (V_max) of acetylcholine esterase in the corpus striatum during diabetes to near control state. In diabetic rats there was a decrease in maximal number (B_max) and affinity (K_d) of total muscarinic receptors whereas muscarinic M1 receptors were increased with decrease in affinity in diabetic rats. We observed that, in all cases, the binding parameters were reversed to near control by the treatment of diabetic rats with insulin. Real-time PCR experiment confirmed the increase in muscarinic M1 receptor gene expression and a similar reversal with insulin treatment. These results suggest the diabetes-induced changes of the cholinergic activity in the corpus striatum and the regulatory role of insulin on binding parameters and gene expression of total and muscarinic M1 receptors.     

Deoxamuscaroneoxime derivatives as useful muscarinic agonists to explore the muscarinic subsite: demox, a modulator of orthosteric and allosteric sites at cardiac muscarinic M2 receptors

A series of muscarinic agonists, straight chained, branched, cyclic alkyl and aromatic derivatives of the oxime 1 (demox) was designed with the aim of investigating their activity on muscarinic receptor subtypes. Effects on M1 receptor were assessed functionally by a microphysiometer apparatus, while M2, M3, and M4 receptor potency and affinity were studied on isolated preparations of guinea pig heart, ileum, and lung, respectively. The results suggest that the substitution of a hydrogen with a long side-chain or bulky group generally induces a decrease in potency at M1 and M3 subtypes, while a general increase in this parameter is obtained at M2 subtype. Among the agonists 2-18, compound 4 behaves as a full agonist with a preference for M3 subtype. Moreover, compound 12 is inactive at M1 and M4 receptors while it displays a full agonist activity at M2 and M3 subtypes. Since demox displays a variable response on cardiac M2 receptors regulating heart force, an in-depth inquiry of the functional behaviour of this compound was carried out at M2 receptors. In presence of 10(-11) and 10(-10) M demox, the binding of [3H]-NMS was increased by approximately 30% as a consequence of an increase of the association of [3H]-NMS to membranes; this effect was not observed in presence of a higher concentration of [3H]-NMS. Higher concentrations of demox decreased the binding of [3H]-NMS to heart atrial membranes but significantly retarded the dissociation of this radioligand. Our results suggest that demox may interact with orthosteric and allosteric sites of atrial M2 muscarinic receptor.     

Muscarinic receptor subtypes in bovine adrenal medulla

Catecholamine secretion in the bovine adrenal medulla is evoked largely by nicotinic receptor activation. However, bovine adrenal medulla also contain muscarinic receptors that mediate several cell responses. To understand the physiological role of muscarinic receptors in the bovine adrenal medulla it is important to identify the pharmacological subtypes present in this tissue. For this, we analyzed the abilities of differnt selective muscarinic antagonists in displacing the binding of the non-selective antagonist [3H] quinuclidinyl benzylate to an enriched plasma membrane fraction prepared from bovine adrenal medulla. All the selective antagonists bind at least two bindings sites with different affinities. The binding profile of the sites with high proportion is similar to the M2 subtype and those present in low proportion have a M1 profile. However, some variation in the proportion of the sites for the different ligands suggest the presence of the third pharmacological subtype (M3). We conclude that the sites in high proportion (60–80%) correspond to M2 muscarinic subtypes, and the rest is constitute by M1 plus M3 subtypes. The presence of multiplicity of subtypes in the adrenal medulla membranes suggests a diversity of functions of muscarinic receptors in the adrenal gland.Abbreviations [3H]QNB [3H]quinuclidinyl benzylate - HHSiD hexahydro-siladifenidol-hydrochloride - AF-DX 116 11-[[2-(diethylamino)methyl]]-1-piperidinyl]-5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido[2,3,-b][1,4]benzodiazepin-6-one - 4-DAMP 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl piperidine methobromide     

Identification of M2 muscarinic receptors in membranes from bovine cerebral basal arteries

Muscarinic receptors were identified in membrane preparations from bovine cerebral arteries by the specific binding of [3H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate. The total amount of binding sites is relatively high: 1.5 pmol/mg protein, as compared to 0.91 pmol/mg for bovine cerebral cortex and 0.08 pmol/mg for heart muscle. In this study we show that the majority of these sites correspond to M2-receptors: 84% of the sites display low affinity for pirenzepine. In addition, GTP causes a rightward shift and steepening of the carbachol competition binding curve. In the presence of GTP, the alkylating reagent N-ethylmaleimide causes a 28-fold increase of the affinity for carbachol. This phenomenon is also observed on bovine heart membranes where muscarinic receptors are known to be of the M2 type. In contrast, muscarinic receptors in cerebral cortex, predominantly of the M1-type, show only a 4-fold increase in agonist affinity by N-ethylmaleimide. These findings suggest that the ability of N-ethylmaleimide to modulate the agonist affinity is an additional criterion for the characterization of muscarinic M2-type receptors.     

The design of novel methoctramine-related tetraamines as muscarinic receptor subtype selective antagonists

Several novel methoctramine-related tetraamines were designed, and their biological profiles at muscarinic receptor subtypes were assessed by functional experiments in isolated guinea pig and rat atria (M2) and smooth muscle (ileum and trachea, M3) and by binding assays in rat cortex (M1), heart (M2), and submaxillary gland (M3) homogenates and NG 108-15 cells (M4). Tripitramine, a nonsymmetrical tetraamine, resulted in the most potent and the most selective muscarinic M2 receptor antagonist of the series (pA2 = 9.14-9.85; pKi = 9.54). Spirotramine (FC 15-94), a symmetrical tetraamine, was able to differentiate between muscarinic M1 receptors (pKi = 7.88) and the other subtypes (M2, pKi = 6.20; M3, pKi = 5.81; M4, pKi = 6.27). Thus, tripitramine and spirotramine could be valuable tools for the pharmacological classification and characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes.     

Neuronal soma-dendritic and prejunctional M1-M4 receptors in gastrointestinal and genitourinary smooth muscle

A variety of neurons in gastrointestinal and genitourinary smooth muscle express muscarinic auto- as well as heteroreceptors. These receptors are found on the soma and dendrites of many cholinergic, sympathetic and NANC neurons and on axon terminals. A given neuron may contain both excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic muscarinic receptors. The subtypes involved are species- and tissue-dependent, and neuronal M1 to M4 receptors have been shown to be expressed in smooth muscle tissues. In this study, the ability of several selective muscarinic receptor antagonists to inhibit the effect of arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) on prejunctional muscarinic receptors on sympathetic nerve endings in the rabbit anococcygeus muscle (RAM) was investigated to characterise the receptor subtype involved. Electrical field stimulation (EFS) resulted in a release of noradrenaline (NA) eliciting monophasic contractions due to stimulation of postjunctional alpha1-adrenoceptors. The selective muscarinic agonist APE did not reduce contractions to exogenous NA, but caused a concentration-related and N-methylatropine-sensitive inhibition of neurogenic responses. All muscarinic antagonists investigated failed to affect the EFS-induced contractions, but shifted the concentration-response curve of APE to the right in a parallel and surmountable fashion. Schild analysis yielded regression lines of unit slope, indicating competitive antagonism. The following rank order of antagonist potencies (pA2 values) was found: tripitramine (9.10) > AQ-RA 741 (8.26) > or = himbacine (8.04) > or = (S)-dimethindene (7.69) > pirenzepine (6.46) > or = p-F-HHSiD (6.27). A comparison of the pA2 values determined in the present study with literature binding and functional affinities obtained at native or recombinant M1 to M5 receptors strongly suggests that NA release from sympathetic nerve endings in RAM is inhibited by activation of prejunctional muscarinic M2 receptors.     

Different antagonist binding properties of rat pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors

The antagonist binding properties of rat pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors were compared. In both tissues pirenzepine (PZ) had a low affinity for muscarinic receptors labelled by (3H)N-methylscopolamine [3)NMS) (KD values of 140 and 280 nM, respectively, in pancreatic and cardiac homogenates). The binding properties of pancreatic and cardiac receptors were, however, markedly different. This was indicated by different affinities for dicyclomine, (11-([(2-[diethylamino)-methyl)-1-piperidinyl] acetyl)-5, 11-dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)(1,4) benzodiazepin-6-on) (AFDX-116), 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine methobromide (4-DAMP) and hexahydrosiladifenidol (HHSiD). Pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors also showed different (3H)NMS association and dissociation rates. These results support the concept of M2 receptor heterogeneity and confirm that M2 receptor subtypes have different binding kinetic properties.     

Pharmacologic characterization of muscarinic receptors of insect brains.

Muscarinic receptors in brain membranes from honey bees, houseflies, and the American cockroach were identified by their specific binding of the non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB) and the displacement of this binding by agonists as well as subtype-selective antagonists, using filtration assays. The binding parameters, obtained from Scatchard analysis, indicated that insect muscarinic receptors, like those of mammalian brains, had high affinities for [3H]QNB (KD = 0.47 nM in honey bees, 0.17 nM in houseflies and 0.13 nM in the cockroach). However, the receptor concentration was low (108, 64.7, and 108 fmol/mg protein for the three species, respectively). The association and dissociation rates of [3H]QNB binding to honey bee brain membranes, sensitivity of [3H]QNB binding to muscarinic agonists, and high affinity for atropine were also features generally similar to muscarinic receptors of mammalian brains. In order to further characterize the three insect brain muscarinic receptors, the displacement of [3H]QNB binding by subtype-selective antagonists was studied. The rank order of potency of pirenzepine (PZ), the M1 selective antagonist, 11-[2-[dimethylamino)-methyl)1-piperidinyl)acetyl)-5,11- dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)-(1,4)-benzodiazepin-6 one (AF-DX 116), the M2-selective antagonist, and 4-DAMP (4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide) the M3-selective antagonist, was also the same as that of mammalian brains, i.e., 4-DAMP greater than PZ greater than AF-DX 116. The three insect brain receptors had 27-50-fold lower affinity for PZ (Ki 484-900 nM) than did the mammalian brain receptor (Ki 16 nM), but similar to that reported for the muscarinic receptor subtype cloned from Drosophila. Also, the affinity of insect receptors for 4-DAMP (Ki 18.9-56.6 nM) was much lower than that of the M3 receptor, which predominates in rat submaxillary gland (Ki of 0.37 nM on [3H]QNB binding). These drug specificities of muscarinic receptors of brains from three insect species suggest that insect brains may be predominantly of a unique subtype that is close to, though significantly different from, the mammalian M3 subtype.