Studies of He-T DNA sequences in the pericentric regions of Drosophila chromosomes

He-T DNA is a complex set of repeated DNA sequences with sharply defined locations in the polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. He-T sequences are found only in the chromocenter and in the terminal (telomere) band on each chromosome arm. Both of these regions appear to be heterochromatic and He-T sequences are never detected in the euchromatic arms of the chromosomes (Young et al. 1983). In the study reported here, in situ hybridization to metaphase chromosomes was used to study the association of He-T DNA with heterochromatic regions that are under-replicated in polytene chromosomes. Although the metaphase Y chromosome appears to be uniformly heterochromatic, He-T DNA hybridization is concentrated in the pericentric region of both normal and deleted Y chromosomes. He-T DNA hybridization is also concentrated in the pericentric regions of the autosomes. Much lower levels of He-T sequences were found in pericentric regions of normal X chromosomes; however compound X chromosomes, constructed by exchanges involving Y chromosomes, had large amounts of He-T DNA, presumably residual Y sequences. The apparent co-localization of He-T sequences with satellite DNAs in pericentric heterochromatin of metaphase chromosomes contrasts with the segregation of satellite DNA to alpha heterochromatin while He-T sequences hybridize to beta heterochromatin in polytene nuclei. This comparison suggests that satellite sequences do not exist as a single block within each chromosome but have interspersed regions of other sequences, including He-T DNA. If this is so, we assume that the satellite DNA blocks must associate during polytenization, leaving the interspersed sequences looped out to form beta heterochromatin. DNA from D. melanogaster has many restriction fragments with homology to He-T sequences. Some of these fragments are found only on the Y. Two of the repeated He-T family restriction fragments are found entirely on the short arm of the Y, predominantly in the pericentric region. Under conditions of moderate stringency, a subset of He-T DNA sequences cross-hybridizes with DNA from D. simulans and D. miranda. In each species, a large fraction of the cross-hybridizing sequences is on the Y chromosome.     

Genetic dissection of heterochromatin in Drosophila: The role of basal X heterochromatin in meiotic sex chromosome behaviour

We have examined the female meiotic behaviour of three X chromosomes which have large deletions of the basal heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster. We find that most of this heterochromatin can be removed without substantially altering pairing and segregation of the two Xs. To compare the role of heterochromatin in male meiosis we have constructed individuals which carry two extra identical heterochromatic mini X chromosomes. These minis behave as univalents even though their heterochromatin is known to contain satellite DNA. We conclude therefore that this satellite DNA is not sufficient to allow effectively normal meiotic behaviour. In all other respects our results in the male extend and confirm Cooper's postulate that there exist specific pairing sites in the X heterochromatin. Thus we find no support in either female or male meiosis for the concept that satellite DNA is involved in meiotic chromosome pairing of either a chiasmate or an achiasmate kind.     

Localization of chromosomal DNA sequences homologous to ribosomal gene type I insertion DNA in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Chromosomal sites which have DNA homology to the 1 kb (kilobase pair) BamHI restrictable fragment of the 5 kb type I insertion present in many ribosomal genes in Drosophila melanogaster, were identified by using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. XX and XY complements of polytene chromosomes showed the nucleolus and chromocenter to be heavily labeled. Of the light label over euchromatic regions, the 102C band of chromosome 4 labeled particularly intensely. In mitotic XX and XY complements, the NORs (nucleolus organizer regions) of both sex chromosomes labeled as did the centromeric heterochromatin of autosomes. Label also appeared less frequently over telomeric and euchromatic regions.     

Homolog pairing and sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> male meiosis I

Drosophila males undergo meiosis without recombination or chiasmata but homologous chromosomes pair and disjoin regularly. The X–Y pair utilizes a specific repeated sequence within the heterochromatic ribosomal DNA blocks as a pairing site. No pairing sites have yet been identified for the autosomes. To search for such sites, we utilized probes targeting specific heterochromatic regions to assay heterochromatin pairing sequences and behavior in meiosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We found that the small fourth chromosome pairs at heterochromatic region 61 and associates with the X chromosome throughout prophase I. Homolog pairing of the fourth chromosome is disrupted when the homolog conjunction complex is perturbed by mutations in SNM or MNM. On the other hand, six tested heterochromatic regions of the major autosomes proved to be largely unpaired after early prophase I, suggesting that stable homolog pairing sites do not exist in heterochromatin of the major autosomes. Furthermore, FISH analysis revealed two distinct patterns of sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin: regions with stable cohesion and regions lacking cohesion. This suggests that meiotic sister chromatid cohesion is incomplete within heterochromatin and may occur at specific preferential sites.     

Genetic studies on heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster and their implications for the functions of satellite DNA

In Drosophila melanogaster the centromeric heterochromatin of all chromosomes consists almost entirely of several different satellite DNA sequences. In view of this we have examined by genetic means the meiotic consequences of X chromosomes with partial deletions of their heterochromatin, and have found that the amount and position of recombination on each heterochromatically deleted X is substantially different from that of a normal X. It appears that the amount of heterochromatin is important in modifying the centromere effect on recombination. — In all the deleted Xs tested, chromosome segregation is not appreciably altered from that of a nondeleted control chromosome. Thus satellite DNA does not appear to be an important factor in determining the regular segregation of sex chromosomes in Drosophila. Additionally, since X chromosomes with massive satellite DNA deficiencies are able to participate in a chromocenter within salivary gland nuclei, a major role of satellite DNA in chromocenter formation in this tissue is also quite unlikely. — In order to examine the mechanisms by which the amount of satellite DNA is increased or decreased in vivo, we have measured cytologically the frequency of spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in a ring Y chromosome which is entirely heterochromatic and consists almost exclusively of satellite DNA. In larval neuroblast cells the frequency of spontaneous SCE in this Y is approximately 0.3% per cell division. Since there is no meiotic recombination in D. melanogaster males and since meiotic recombination in the female does not occur in heterochromatin, our results provide a minimum estimate of the in vivo frequency of SCE in C-banded heterochromatin (which is predominantly simple sequence DNA), without the usual complications of substituted base analogs, incorporated radioactive label or substantial genetic content. — We emphasise that: (a) satellite DNA is not implicated in any major way in recognition processes such as meiotic homologue recognition or chromocenter formation in salivaries, (b) there is likely to be continuous variation in the amount of satellite DNA between individuals of a species; and (c) the amount of satellite DNA can have a crucial functional role in the meiotic recombination system.     

Sex Chromosome Meiotic Drive in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Males

In Drosophila melanogaster males, deficiency for X heterochromatin causes high X-Y nondisjunction and skewed sex chromosome segregation ratios (meiotic drive). Y and XY classes are recovered poorly because of sperm dysfunction. In this study it was found that X heterochromatic deficiencies disrupt recovery not only of the Y chromosome but also of the X and autosomes, that both heterochromatic and euchromatic regions of chromosomes are affected and that the "sensitivity" of a chromosome to meiotic drive is a function of its length. Two models to explain these results are considered. One is a competitive model that proposes that all chromosomes must compete for a scarce chromosome-binding material in Xh(-) males. The failure to observe competitive interactions among chromosome recovery probabilities rules out this model. The second is a pairing model which holds that normal spermiogenesis requires X-Y pairing at special heterochromatic pairing sites. Unsaturated pairing sites become gametic lethals. This model fails to account for autosomal sensitivity to meiotic drive. It is also contradicted by evidence that saturation of Y-pairing sites fails to suppress meiotic drive in Xh(- ) males and that extra X-pairing sites in an otherwise normal male do not induce drive. It is argued that meiotic drive results from separation of X euchromatin from X heterochromatin.     

There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females,one of which requires heterochromatic homology

There are numerous examples of the regular segregation of achiasmate chromosomes at meiosis I in Drosophila melanogaster females. Classically, the choice of achiasmate segregational partners has been thought to be independent of homology, but rather made on the basis of availability or similarities in size and shape. To the contrary, we show here that heterochromatic homology plays a primary role in ensuring the proper segregation of achiasmate homologs. We observe that the heterochromatin of chromosome 4 functions as, or contains, a meiotic pairing site. We show that free duplications carrying the 4th chromosome pericentric heterochromatin induce high frequencies of 4th chromosome nondisjunction regardless of their size. Moreover, a duplication from which some of the 4th chromosome heterochromatin has been removed is unable to induce 4th chromosome nondisjunction. Similarly, in the absence of either euchromatic homology or a size similarity, duplications bearing the X chromosome heterochromatin also disrupt the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosome centromeres. Although heterochromatic regions are sufficient to conjoin nonexchange homologues, we confirm that the segregation of heterologous chromosomes is determined by size, shape, and availability. The meiotic mutation Axs differentiates between these two processes of achiasmate centromere coorientation by disrupting only the homology-dependent mechanism. Thus there are two different mechanisms by which achiasmate segregational partners are chosen. We propose that the absence of diplotene-diakinesis during female meiosis allows heterochromatic pairings to persist until prometaphase and thus to co-orient homologous centromeres. We also propose that heterologous disjunctions result from a separate and homology-independent process that likely occurs during prometaphase. The latter process, which may not require the physical association of segregational partners, is similar to those observed in many insects, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in C. elegans males. We also suggest that the physical basis of this process may reflect known properties of the Drosophila meiotic spindle. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The location of highly repetitious DNA in the somatic chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster

In situ hybridization of Drosophila melanogaster somatic chromosomes has been used to demonstrate the near exact correspondence between the location of highly repetitious DNA and classically defined constitutive heterochromatin. The Y chromosome, in particular, is heavily labeled even by cRNA transcribed from female (XX) DNA templates (i.e., DNA from female Drosophila with 2 Xs and 2 sets of autosomes). This observation confirms earlier reports that the Y chromosome contains repeated DNA sequences that are shared by other chromosomes. In grain counting experiments the Y chromosome shows significantly heavier label than any other chromosome when hybridized with cRNA from XY DNA templates (i.e., DNA from male Drosophila with 1 X and 1 Y plus 2 sets of autosomes). However, the preferential labeling of the Y is abolished if the cRNA is derived from XX DNA. We interpret these results as indicating the presence of a class of Y chromosome specific repeated DNA in D. melanogaster. The relative inefficiency of the X chromosome in binding cRNA from XY and XYY DNA templates, coupled with its ability to bind XX derived cRNA, may also indicate the presence of an X chromosome specific repeated DNA.     

Differences in the meiotic pairing behavior of gonosomal heterochromatin between female and male Microtus agrestis: implications for the mechanism of heterochromatin amplification on the X and Y

It is generally thought that pairing and recombination between the X and Y chromosome in eutherian mammals is important for the occurrence of normal meiotic division and the production of functional gametes. Microtus agrestis is one of the examples whose giant and heterochromatin-rich sex chromosomes fail to establish a durable association at any stage of the first meiotic division in males. In contrast, in females, synapsis starts in the euchromatic short arm and pairing progresses unidirectionally and continues until both X chromosomes have paired completely, as can be demonstrated by the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization with a sequence confined to the non-centromeric, gonosomal heterochromatin. However, compared with euchromatin, this association is apparently ephemeral and breaks off precociously in the pachytene and metaphase I stages. We demonstrate that a middle repetitive element is localized interspersed in the noncentromeric heterochromatin of both X and Y, except the telomeric region of the Y. No differences could be detected at the molecular level between male and female DNA, indicating that at least the bulk of these elements are organized in the same manner on the X and Y. Our data imply that the loss of synapsis and recombination between the X and Y might have preceded the process of heterochromatin amplification in the course of Microtinae evolution. Since asynapsed elements are particularly susceptible to DNA strand breaks during prophase I, DNA repair of double-strand breaks involving heterochromatic segments of the X and Y could have resulted in translocations of larger segments from the X to the Y or vice versa during the course of chromosome evolution of the gonosomes, explaining the homology at the molecular level between the heterochromatin of the asynaptic X and Y in M. agrestis.     

The centric region of the X chromosome rDNA functions in male meiotic pairing in Drosophila melanogaster

In Drosophila melanogaster males, sex chromosome pairing at meiosis is ensured by so-called pairing site(s) located discretely in the centric heterochromatin. The property of the pairing sites is not well understood. Recently, an hypothesis has been proposed that 240 bp repeats in the nontranscribed spacer region of rDNA function as the pairing sites in male meiosis. However, considerable cytogenetic evidence exists that is contrary to this hypothesis. Hence, the question is whether the chromosomal rDNA clusters, in which a high copy number of 240 bp repeats exists, are involved in the pairing. In order to resolve the problem we X-rayed Drosophila carrying the X chromosome inversion In(1)sc ^V2L sc ^8R and generated free, mini-X chromosomes carrying a substantial amount of rDNA. We defined cytogenetically the size of the mini-chromosomes and studied their meiotic behavior. Our results demonstrate that the heterochromatin at the distal end of the inversion, whose length is approximately 0.4 times that of the fourth chromosome, includes a meiotic pairing site in the male. We discuss the cytological location of the pairing site and the possible role of rDNA in meiotic pairing.     

Hoechst 33258 banding of Drosophila nasutoides metaphase chromosomes

Hoechst 33258 banding of D. nasutoides metaphase chromosomes is described and compared with Q and C bands. The C band positive regions of the euchromatic autosomes, the X and the Y fluoresce brightly, as is typical of Drosophila and other species. The fluorescence pattern of the large heterochromatic chromosome is atypical, however. Contrary to the observations on other species, the C negative bands of the large heterochromatic chromosome are brightly fluorescent with both Hoechst 33258 and quinacrine. Based on differences in the various banding patterns, four classes of heterochromatin are described in the large heterochromatic chromosome and it is suggested that each class may correspond to an AT-rich DNA satellite.     

Composition and epigenetic markers of heterochromatin in the aphid Aphis nerii (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

A detailed karyotype analysis of the oleander aphid Aphis nerii focusing on the distribution, molecular composition and epigenetic modifications of heterochromatin was done in order to better understand the structure and evolution of holocentric/holokinetic chromosomes in aphids. The female karyotype (2n = 8) consisted of 3 pairs of autosomes and a pair of X chromosomes that were the longest elements in the karyotype and carried a single, terminally located nucleolar organizer region. Males showed 2n = 7 chromosomes due to the presence of a single X chromosome. Heterochromatin was located in the X chromosomes only and consisted of 4 satellite DNAs that have been identified. A. nerii constitutive heterochromatin was enriched in mono-, di- and tri-methylated H3 histones and HP1 proteins but, interestingly, it lacked DNA methylation that was widespread in euchromatic chromosomal regions. These results suggest that aphid heterochromatin is assembled and condensed without any involvement of DNA methylation.     

Distribution of heterochromatin on the mitotic chromosomes of Musca domestica L. in relation to the activity of male-determining factors

In the housefly, male sex is determined by a dominant factor, M, located either on the Y, on the X, or on any of the five autosomes. M factors on autosome I and on fragments of the Y chromosome show incomplete expressivity, whereas M factors on the other autosomes are fully expressive. To test whether these differences might be caused by heterochromatin-dependent position effects, we studied the distribution of heterochromatin on the mitotic chromosomes by C-banding and by fluorescence in situ hybridization of DNA fragments amplified from microdissected mitotic chromosomes. Our results show a correlation between the chromosomal position of M and the strength of its male-determining activity: weakly masculinizing M factors are exclusively located on chromosomes with extensive heterochromatic regions, i.e., on autosome I and on the Y chromosome. The Y is known to contain at least two copies of the M factor, which ensures a strong masculinizing effect despite the heterochromatic environment. The heterochromatic regions of the sex chromosomes consist of repetitive sequences that are unique to the X and the Y, whereas their euchromatic parts contain sequences that are ubiquitously found in the euchromatin of all chromosomes of the complement. Received: 20 February 1998; in revised form: 11 May 1998 / Accepted: 23 May 1998     

Satellite DNA in the kangaroo Macropus rufogriseus

Two distinct satellite DNAs, amounting to 25% of the total DNA, were isolated from the nuclei of the red-necked wallaby, Macropus rufogriseus. The physical properties of native, single-stranded and reassociated molecules were studied in buoyant-density gradient centrifugation. The homogeneity of each satellite fraction was examined using melting characteristics of native and reassociated DNA, and renaturation kinetics. These data suggest that sequence heterogeneity exists in both fractions. Each satellite fraction was found by in situ hybridization to be localized in heterochromatin of interphase nuclei and in the centromeric regions of metaphase chromosomes. The chromosomal distributions of the two satellite DNAs differentiate the sex chromosomes, which have sequences of only one satellite, from the autosomes which have sequences of both satellites in the centromeric heterochromatin. Giemsa C-banding techniques also showed a differentiation of the centromeric regions of sex chromosomes from those of the autosomes.     

There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females, one of which requires heterochromatic homology.

There are numerous examples of the regular segregation of achiasmate chromosomes at meiosis I in Drosophila melanogaster females. Classically, the choice of achiasmate segregational partners has been thought to be independent of homology, but rather made on the basis of availability or similarities in size and shape. To the contrary, we show here that heterochromatic homology plays a primary role in ensuring the proper segregation of achiasmate homologs. We observe that the heterochromatin of chromosome 4 functions as, or contains, a meiotic pairing site. We show that free duplications carrying the 4th chromosome pericentric heterochromatin induce high frequencies of 4th chromosome nondisjunction regardless of their size. Moreover, a duplication from which some of the 4th chromosome heterochromatin has been removed is unable to induce 4th chromosome nondisjunction. Similarly, in the absence of either euchromatic homology or a size similarity, duplications bearing the X chromosome heterochromatin also disrupt the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosome centromeres. Although heterochromatic regions are sufficient to conjoin nonexchange homologues, we confirm that the segregation of heterologous chromosomes is determined by size, shape, and availability. The meiotic mutation Axs differentiates between these two processes of achiasmate centromere coorientation by disrupting only the homology-dependent mechanism. Thus there are two different mechanisms by which achiasmate segregational partners are chosen. We propose that the absence of diplotene-diakinesis during female meiosis allows heterochromatic pairings to persist until prometaphase and thus to co-orient homologous centromeres. We also propose that heterologous disjunctions result from a separate and homology-independent process that likely occurs during prometaphase. The latter process, which may not require the physical association of segregational partners, is similar to those observed in many insects, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in C. elegans males. We also suggest that the physical basis of this process may reflect known properties of the Drosophila meiotic spindle.     

Chromosome banding in Amphibia

The chromosomes of the South American marsupial frogs Gastrotheca fissipes, G. ovifera, G. walkeri and Flectonotus pygmaeus were analyzed by means of conventional and various banding techniques. The karyotypes of G. ovifera and G. walkeri are characterized by highly differentiated XY/XX sex chromosomes. Whereas the X chromosomes and autosomes contain large amounts of constitutive heterochromatin, extremely little heterochromatin is located in the Y chromosomes. This is in contrast to all previously known amphibian Y chromosomes and the Y chromosomes of most other vertebrates. In the male meiosis of G. walkeri, the euchromatic segments of the heteromorphic XY chromosomes show the same pairing configuration as the autosomal bivalents. The karyotype of F. pygmaeus is remarkable for the unique presence of telocentric chromosomes and the high frequency of interstitially located chiasmata in the meiotic bivalents. The evolution of the karyotypes and sex chromosomes, the structure of the various classes of heterochromatin and the data obtained from meiotic analyses of the marsupial hylids are discussed.     

Evolution of DNA in Heterochromatin: the Drosophila Melanogaster Sibling Species Subgroup as a Resource

The Drosophila melanogasterspecies subgroup is a closely-knit collection of eight sibling species whose relationships are well defined. These species are too close for most evolutionary studies of euchromatic genes but are ideal to investigate the major changes that occur to DNA in heterochromatin over short periods during evolution. For example, it is not known whether the locations of genes in heterochromatin are conserved over this time. The 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA genes can be considered as genuine heterochromatic genes. In D. melanogasterthe rRNA genes are located at two sites, one each on the X and Y chromosome. In the other seven sibling species, rRNA genes are also located on the sex chromosomes but the positions often vary significantly, particularly on the Y. Furthermore, rDNA has been lost from the Y chromosome of both D. simulansand D. sechellia, presumably after separation of the line leading to present-day D. mauritiana.We conclude that changes to chromosomal position and copy number of rDNA arrays occur over much shorter evolutionary timespans than previously thought. In these respects the rDNA behaves more like the tandemly repeated satellite DNAs than euchromatic genes. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The distribution of male meiotic pairing sites on chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster: meiotic pairing and segregation of 2-Y transpositions

The distribution of meiotic pairing sites on a Drosophila melanogaster autosome was studied by characterizing patterns of prophase pairing and anaphase segregation in males heterozygous for a number of 2-Y transpositions, collectively coveringall of chromosome arm 2R and one-fourth of chromosome arm 2L. It was found that all transpositions involving euchromatin from chromosome 2, even short stretches, increased the frequency of prophase I quadrivalents involving the sex and second chromosome bivalents above background levels. Quadrivalent frequencies were the same whether the males carried both elements of the transposition or just the Dp (2;Y) element along with two normal chromosome 2s, indicating that pairing is non-competitive. The frequency of quadrivalents was proportional to the size of the transposed region, suggesting that pairing sites are widely distributed on chromosome 2. Moreover, all but the smallest transpositions caused a detectable bias in the segregation ratio, in favor of alternate segregations, indicating that the prophase associations were effective in orienting centromeres to opposite poles. One transposition involving only heterochromatin of chromosome 2 had no effect on quadrivalent frequency, consistent with previous evidence that autosomal heterochromatin lacks meiotic pairing ability in males. One region at the base of chromosome arm 2L proved to be especially effective in stimulating quadrivalent formation and anaphase segregation, indicating the presence of a strong pairing site in this region. It is concluded that autosomal pairing in D. melanogaster males is based on general homology, despite the lack of homologous recombination.by A.C. Spradling