Rejection of skin allografts by CD4+ T cells is antigen-specific and requires expression of target alloantigen on Ia- epidermal cells

The effector mechanism of skin allograft rejection has been characterized as Ag specific, rejecting cells that express the target alloantigen but sparing those that do not. However, the rejection of MHC class II disparate skin grafts, in which very few cells (Langerhans cells) actually express the target Ia Ag could conceivably proceed by either one of two distinct rejection mechanisms. One possibility is that Ia- cells are destroyed by a sequence of events in which CD4+ T cells, activated by Ia+ LC, elaborate soluble factors that are either directly cytolytic or that recruit and activate non-specific effector cells. The alternative possibility is that activated CD4+ T cells elaborate soluble factors which induce Ia expression on Ia- cell populations, and that these Ia+ cells are subsequently destroyed by effector cells specific for the induced Ia alloantigens. We found that rejection of Ia+ LC was not of itself sufficient to cause rejection of skin grafts, indicating that skin allograft rejection is contingent on the destruction not only of LC but of other graft cell populations as well. We then investigated whether CD4+ T cells rejected allogeneic skin grafts in an antigen specific fashion. To do so, we engrafted immunoincompetent H-2b nude mice with trunk skin grafts from B6----A/J allophenic mice because such skin is composed of mutually exclusive cell populations expressing either H-2a or H-2b histocompatibility Ag, but not both. The engrafted mice were subsequently reconstituted with H-2b CD4+ T cells. The CD4+ T cells destroyed keratinocytes of A/J origin but spared keratinocytes of B6 origin, even though neither cell population constitutively expresses target IAk alloantigen. The targeted rejection of A/J keratinocytes but not of B6 keratinocytes indicates that the target Ia alloantigen must have been induced on Ia- A/J keratinocytes, rendering them susceptible to destruction by anti-Iak-specific CD4+ effector cells. These data demonstrate that CD4+ T cell rejection of skin allografts is mediated by Ag-specific CD4+ cytolytic T cells and hence, requires the induction of target Ia alloantigens on epidermal cells within the graft.     

Induction of alloreactive CD4 T cell tolerance in molecular chimeras: a possible role for regulatory T cells

Induction of molecular chimerism following reconstitution of mice with autologous bone marrow cells expressing a retrovirally encoded allogeneic MHC class I Ag results in donor-specific tolerance. To investigate the mechanism by which CD4 T cells that recognize allogeneic MHC class I through the indirect pathway of Ag presentation are rendered tolerant in molecular chimeras, transgenic mice expressing a TCR on CD4 T cells specific for peptides derived from K(b) were used. CD4 T cells expressing the transgenic TCR were detected in mice reconstituted with bone marrow cells transduced with retroviruses carrying the gene encoding H-2K(b), albeit detection was at lower levels than in mice receiving mock-transduced bone marrow. Despite the presence of CD4 T cells expressing an alloreactive TCR, mice receiving H-2K(b)-transduced bone marrow permanently accepted K(b) disparate skin grafts. CD4+CD25+ T cells from mice reconstituted with H-2K(b)-transduced bone marrow prevented rejection of K(b) disparate skin grafts when adoptively transferred into immunodeficient mice along with effector T cells, suggesting that induction of molecular chimerism leads to the generation of donor specific regulatory T cells, which may be involved in preventing alloreactive CD4 T cell responses that lead to rejection.     

Alloreactive T cell responses and acute rejection of single class II MHC-disparate heart allografts are under strict regulation by CD4+ CD25+ T cells

Skin but not vascularized cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 mice are acutely rejected by C57BL/6 recipients in response to the single class II MHC disparity. The underlying mechanisms preventing acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients were investigated. B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts induced low levels of alloreactive effector T cell priming in C57BL/6 recipients, and this priming was accompanied by low-level cellular infiltration into the allograft that quickly resolved. Recipients with long-term-surviving heart allografts were unable to reject B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts, suggesting potential down-regulatory mechanisms induced by the cardiac allografts. Depletion of CD25+ cells from C57BL/6 recipients resulted in 15-fold increases in alloreactive T cell priming and in acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts. Similarly, reconstitution of B6.Rag(-/-) recipients with wild-type C57BL/6 splenocytes resulted in acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts only if CD25+ cells were depleted. These results indicate that acute rejection of single class II MHC-disparate B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients is inhibited by the emergence of CD25+ regulatory cells that restrict the clonal expansion of alloreactive T cells.     

Allo-I-J determinants participate in maintenance of neonatal H-2 tolerance

To evaluate the role of IJ antigens in maintenance of the tolerant state in adult H-2 tolerant mice, we have attempted to abolish tolerance by injecting monoclonal antibodies (mab) specific for host, donor, or third party IJ antigens into adult H-2 tolerant mice. Abolition of tolerance was evidenced by the rejection of fresh test skin grafts bearing the tolerated antigens. Whole H-2 tolerant mice treated with anti-IJ mab specific for donor (allo) IJ antigens rejected their test skin grafts, indicating that tolerance had been abolished. When two other types of tolerant mice were tested, we found that mice tolerant of class II antigens alone, but not mice tolerant of an IJ thru D disparity, were susceptible to the anti-donor IJ mab treatment. In addition, adult tolerant mice were unaffected by treatment with either anti-host or anti-third party IJ mab. When tested in vitro, lymphoid cells from tolerant mice, the tolerance of which was abolished by anti-IJ mab, remained unresponsive to the tolerogen, just as untreated (control) tolerant mice, in several in vitro assays (e.g., mixed lymphocyte reaction, cytotoxic T cell precursor frequency and bulk cell-mediated lysis without growth factor). Mice treated with antidonor IJ mab, however, unlike mice treated with anti-host or third party IJ mab, were capable of generating tolerogen-specific T cells in the absence of exogenous growth factor. Thus in the strain combinations we used, adult mice tolerant of either the entire H-2 region or of the class II major histocompatibility complex region alone are susceptible to abolition of the tolerant state by treatment with anti-donor IJ mab. Coincidentally, lymphoid cells from these mice generate sufficient endogenous T helper activity to activate the tolerogen-specific cytotoxic T cells. We suspect that these latter cells may be responsible for rejection of grafts bearing the tolerated antigens.     

CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells prevent graft rejection: CTLA-4- and IL-10-dependent immunoregulation of alloresponses.

Specific and selective immunological unresponsiveness to donor alloantigens can be induced in vivo. We have shown previously that CD25+CD4+ T cells from mice exhibiting long-term operational tolerance to donor alloantigens can regulate rejection of allogeneic skin grafts mediated by CD45RB(high)CD4+ T cells. In this study, we wished to determine whether donor-specific regulatory cells can be generated during the induction phase of unresponsiveness, i.e., before transplantation. We provide evidence that pretreatment with anti-CD4 Ab plus a donor-specific transfusion generates donor-specific regulatory CD25+CD4+ T cells that can suppress rejection of skin grafts mediated by naive CD45RB(high)CD4+ T cells. Regulatory cells were contained only in the CD25+ fraction, as equivalent numbers of CD25-CD4+ T cells were unable to regulate rejection. This pretreatment strategy led to increased expression of CD122 by the CD25+CD4+ T cells. Blockade of both the IL-10 and CTLA-4 pathways abrogated immunoregulation mediated by CD25+ T cells, suggesting that IL-10 and CTLA-4 are required for the functional activity of this population of immunoregulatory T cells. In clinical transplantation, the generation of regulatory T cells that could provide dynamic control of rejection responses is a possible route to permanent graft survival without the need for long-term immunosuppression.     

Differential susceptibility of allogeneic targets to indirect CD4 immunity generates split tolerance

CD4 T cells frequently help to activate CD8 T and B cells that effect transplant rejection. However, CD4 T cells alone can reject transplants, either directly or indirectly. The relative effectiveness of indirect CD4 immunity in rejecting different types of allogeneic grafts is unknown. To address this, we used a TCR transgenic mouse model in which indirect CD4 alloimmunity alone can be studied. We challenged transgenic recipients with hematopoietic cells and shortly thereafter skin transplants that could only be rejected indirectly, and observed Ag-specific indirect donor B cell and skin rejection, but not T cell elimination, reflecting a state of split tolerance. Deficiency of indirect CD4 alloimmunity in donor T cell rejection was also apparent when acute indirect rejection of donor islets occurred despite generation and maintenance of mixed T cell chimerism, due to migration of the few passenger T cells into recipient circulation. Although passenger lymphocytes delayed indirect islet rejection, they enhanced rejection by a full repertoire capable of both direct and indirect reactivity. Interestingly, the persistence of chimerism was associated with the eventual development of tolerance, as demonstrated by acceptance of donor skin grafts given late to hematopoietic cell recipients, and hyporesponsiveness of transgenic T cells from islet recipients in vitro. Mechanistically, tolerance was recessive and associated with progressive down-regulation of CD4. Collectively, our data indicate that indirect CD4 immunity is not equally destructive toward different types of allogeneic grafts, the deficiency of which generates split tolerance. The futility of these responses can convert immunity into tolerance.     

CD25+ immunoregulatory CD4 T cells mediate acquired central transplantation tolerance

Transplantation tolerance is induced reliably in experimental animals following intrathymic inoculation with the relevant donor strain Ags; however, the immunological mechanisms responsible for the induction and maintenance of the tolerant state remain unknown. We investigated these mechanisms using TCR transgenic mice (TS1) that carry T cells specific for an immunodominant, MHC class II-restricted peptide (S1) of the influenza PR8 hemagglutinin (HA) molecule. We demonstrated that TS1 mice reject skin grafts that have transgene-encoded HA molecules (HA104) as their sole antigenic disparity and that intrathymic but not i.v. inoculation of TS1 mice with S1 peptide induces tolerance to HA-expressing skin grafts. Intrathymic peptide inoculation was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in T cells bearing high levels of TCR specific for HA. However, this reduction was both incomplete and transient, with a full recovery of S1-specific thymocytes by 4 wk. Peptide inoculation into the thymus also resulted in the generation of immunoregulatory T cells (CD4+CD25+) that migrated to the peripheral lymphoid organs. Adoptive transfer experiments using FACS sorted CD4+CD25- and CD4+CD25+ T cells from tolerant mice revealed that the former but not the latter maintain the capacity to induce rejection of HA bearing skin allografts in syngeneic hosts. Our results suggest that both clonal frequency reduction in the thymus and immunoregulatory T cells exported from the thymus are critical to transplantation tolerance induced by intrathymic Ag inoculation.     

Induction of foxP3+ regulatory T cells in the periphery of T cell receptor transgenic mice tolerized to transplants

Transplantation tolerance can be induced in mice by grafting under the cover of nondepleting CD4 plus CD8 or CD154 mAbs. This tolerance is donor Ag specific and depends on a population of CD4(+) regulatory T cells that, as yet, remain poorly defined in terms of their specificity, origin, and phenotype. Blocking of the Ag-specific response in vitro with an anti-CD4 mAb allowed T cells from monospecific female TCR-transgenic mice against the male Ag Dby, presented by H-2E(k), to express high levels of foxP3 mRNA. foxP3 induction was dependent on TGF-beta. The nondepleting anti-CD4 mAb was also able to induce tolerance in vivo in such monospecific TCR-transgenic mice, and this too was dependent on TGF-beta. As in conventional mice, acquired tolerance was dominant, such that naive monospecific T cells were not able to override tolerance. Splenic T cells from tolerant mice proliferated normally in response to Ag, and secreted IFN-gamma and some IL-4, similar to control mice undergoing primary or secondary graft rejection. High levels of foxP3 mRNA, and glucocorticoid-induced TNFR superfamily member 18 (GITR)(+) CD25(+) T cells were found within the tolerated skin grafts of long-term tolerant recipients. These data suggest that regulatory T cells maintaining transplantation tolerance after CD4 Ab blockade can be induced de novo through a TGF-beta-dependent mechanism, and come to accumulate in tolerated grafts.     

PDL1 is required for peripheral transplantation tolerance and protection from chronic allograft rejection

The PD-1:PDL pathway plays an important role in regulating alloimmune responses but its role in transplantation tolerance is unknown. We investigated the role of PD-1:PDL costimulatory pathway in peripheral and a well established model of central transplantation tolerance. Early as well as delayed blockade of PDL1 but not PDL2 abrogated tolerance induced by CTLA4Ig in a fully MHC-mismatched cardiac allograft model. Accelerated rejection was associated with a significant increase in the frequency of IFN-gamma-producing alloreactive T cells and expansion of effector CD8(+) T cells in the periphery, and a decline in the percentage of Foxp3(+) graft infiltrating cells. Similarly, studies using PDL1/L2-deficient recipients confirmed the results with Ab blockade. Interestingly, while PDL1-deficient donor allografts were accepted by wild-type recipients treated with CTLA4Ig, the grafts developed severe chronic rejection and vasculopathy when compared with wild-type grafts. Finally, in a model of central tolerance induced by mixed allogeneic chimerism, engraftment was not abrogated by PDL1/L2 blockade. These novel data demonstrate the critical role of PDL1 for induction and maintenance of peripheral transplantation tolerance by its ability to alter the balance between pathogenic and regulatory T cells. Expression of PDL1 in donor tissue is critical for prevention of in situ graft pathology and chronic rejection.     

Dissociation of hemopoietic chimerism and allograft tolerance after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Creation of stable hemopoietic chimerism has been considered to be a prerequisite for allograft tolerance after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). In this study, we demonstrated that allogeneic BMT with bone marrow cells (BMC) prepared from either knockout mice deficient in both CD4 and CD8 T cells or CD3E-transgenic mice lacking both T cells and NK cells maintained a high degree of chimerism, but failed to induce tolerance to donor-specific wild-type skin grafts. Lymphocytes from mice reconstituted with T cell-deficient BMC proliferated when they were injected into irradiated donor strain mice, whereas lymphocytes from mice reconstituted with wild-type BMC were unresponsive to donor alloantigens. Donor-specific allograft tolerance was restored when donor-type T cells were adoptively transferred to recipient mice given T cell-deficient BMC. These results show that donor T cell engraftment is required for induction of allograft tolerance, but not for creation of continuous hemopoietic chimerism after allogeneic BMT, and that a high degree of chimerism is not necessarily associated with specific allograft tolerance.     

Skin allograft maintenance in a new synchimeric model system of tolerance.

Treatment of mice with a single donor-specific transfusion plus a brief course of anti-CD154 mAb uniformly induces donor-specific transplantation tolerance characterized by the deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Survival of islet allografts in treated mice is permanent, but skin grafts eventually fail unless recipients are thymectomized. To analyze the mechanisms underlying tolerance induction, maintenance, and failure in euthymic mice we created a new analytical system based on allo-TCR-transgenic hemopoietic chimeric graft recipients. Chimeras were CBA (H-2(k)) mice engrafted with small numbers of syngeneic TCR-transgenic KB5 bone marrow cells. These mice subsequently circulated a self-renewing trace population of anti-H-2(b)-alloreactive CD8+ T cells maturing in a normal microenvironment. With this system, we studied the maintenance of H-2(b) allografts in tolerized mice. We documented that alloreactive CD8+ T cells deleted during tolerance induction slowly returned toward pretreatment levels. Skin allograft rejection in this system occurred in the context of 1) increasing numbers of alloreactive CD8+ cells; 2) a decline in anti-CD154 mAb concentration to levels too low to inhibit costimulatory functions; and 3) activation of the alloreactive CD8+ T cells during graft rejection following deliberate depletion of regulatory CD4+ T cells. Rejection of healed-in allografts in tolerized mice appears to be a dynamic process dependent on the level of residual costimulation blockade, CD4+ regulatory cells, and activated alloreactive CD8+ thymic emigrants that have repopulated the periphery after tolerization.     

Both CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-) regulatory cells mediate dominant transplantation tolerance

CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells have been proposed as the principal regulators of both self-tolerance and transplantation tolerance. Although CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells do have a suppressive role in transplantation tolerance, so do CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells, although 10-fold less potent. Abs to CTLA-4, CD25, IL-10, and IL-4 were unable to abrogate suppression mediated by tolerant spleen cells so excluding any of these molecules as critical agents of suppression. CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells from naive mice can also prevent rejection despite the lack of any previous experience of donor alloantigens. However, this requires many more naive than tolerized cells to provide the same degree of suppression. This suggests that a capacity to regulate transplant rejection pre-exists in naive mice, and may be amplified in "tolerized" mice. Serial analysis of gene expression confirmed that cells sorted into CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-) populations were distinct in that they responded to TCR ligation with very different programs of gene expression. Further characterization of the differentially expressed genes may lead to the development of diagnostic tests to monitor the tolerant state.     

Host CD40 ligand deficiency induces long-term allograft survival and donor-specific tolerance in mouse cardiac transplantation but does not prevent graft arteriosclerosis

Although interruption of CD40-CD40L interactions via their respective mAbs yields prolonged allograft survival, the relative importance of CD40 or CD40L on donor or host cells remains unknown. Moreover, it is uncertain whether any allospecific tolerance occurring with CD40-CD40L blockade will also prevent allograft arteriopathy, the major long-term limitation to transplantation. Therefore, we performed cardiac transplantations using CD40L-deficient (CD40L-/-) mice to investigate the mechanisms underlying prolonged allograft survival. Without immunosuppression, wild-type (WT) hosts rejected allo-mismatched WT or CD40L-/- heart allografts within 2 wk. Conversely, allografts in CD40L-/- hosts beat vigorously for 12 wk. Anti-CD40 treatment did not induce graft failure in CD40L-/- recipients. Although graft-infiltrating cells were reduced approximately 50% in CD40L-/- hosts, the relative percentages of macrophages and T cell subsets were comparable to WT. IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-10 were diminished commensurate with the reduced cellular infiltrate; IL-4 was not detected. CD40L-/- recipients did not develop IgG alloantibodies and showed diminished B7 and CD28 expression on subsets of graft-infiltrating cells. CD40L-/- transplant recipients developed allospecific tolerance to the donor haplotype; second set donor skin grafts engrafted well, whereas third-party skin grafts were vigorously rejected. By MLR, splenocytes from CD40L-/- allograft recipients also demonstrated allo-specific hyporesponsiveness. Nevertheless, allografts in CD40L-/- hosts developed significant graft arteriosclerosis by 8-12 wk posttransplant. Therefore, we propose that early alloresponses, without CD40-CD40L costimulation, induce allospecific tolerance but may trigger allo-independent mechanisms that ultimately result in graft vasculopathy.     

CD4 T cell-mediated alloresistance to fully MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow engraftment is dependent on CD40-CD40 ligand interactions, and lasting T cell tolerance is induced by bone marrow transplantation with initial blockade of this pathway

Costimulatory blockade can be used to promote allogeneic marrow engraftment and tolerance induction, but on its own is not 100% reliable. We sought to determine whether one or the other of the CD4 or CD8 T cell subsets of the recipient was primarily responsible for resistance to allogeneic marrow engraftment in mice receiving costimulatory blockade, and to use this information to develop a more reliable, minimal conditioning regimen for induction of mixed chimerism and transplantation tolerance. We demonstrate that a single anti-CD40 ligand mAb treatment is sufficient to completely overcome CD4 cell-mediated resistance to allogeneic marrow engraftment and rapidly induce CD4 cell tolerance, but does not reliably overcome CD8 CTL-mediated alloresistance. The data suggest that costimulation, which activates alloreactive CTL, is insufficient to activate alloreactive CD4 cells when the CD40 pathway is blocked. The addition of host CD8 T cell depletion to anti-CD40 ligand treatment reliably allows the induction of mixed chimerism and donor-specific skin graft tolerance in 3 Gy-irradiated mice receiving fully MHC-mismatched bone marrow grafts. Thus, despite the existence of multiple costimulatory pathways and pathways of APC activation, our studies demonstrate an absolute dependence on CD40-mediated events for CD4 cell-mediated rejection of allogeneic marrow. Exposure to donor bone marrow allows rapid tolerization of alloreactive CD4 cells when the CD40 pathway is blocked, leading to permanent marrow engraftment and intrathymic tolerization of T cells that develop subsequently.     

Characterization of primary T cell subsets mediating rejection of pancreatic islet grafts

The cellular mechanisms by which pancreatic islet grafts are rejected have not been clearly defined. In order to address the roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in pancreatic islet rejection, we used an adoptive transfer model in which H-2b nude mice were reconstituted with negatively selected H-2b CD4+ or CD8+ T cell subpopulations and engrafted with fully allogeneic pancreatic islet grafts. We found that primary (unprimed) CD4+ T cells mediated the rejection of pancreatic islet grafts, whereas, primary CD8+ T cells failed to do so, even though both T cell subpopulations were competent to reject skin allografts. These data indicate that primary CD4+ T cells are necessary for rejection of allogeneic pancreatic islet grafts, whereas primary CD8+ T lymphocytes are not. Implications concerning the nature of the APC involved in the initiation of the rejection response to islet allografts and the expression of MHC Ag by pancreatic islet cells are discussed.     

Tolerance to antigen-presenting cell-depleted islet allografts is CD4 T cell dependent

Pretreatment of pancreatic islets in 95% oxygen culture depletes graft-associated APCs and leads to indefinite allograft acceptance in immunocompetent recipients. As such, the APC-depleted allograft represents a model of peripheral alloantigen presentation in the absence of donor-derived costimulation. Over time, a state of donor-specific tolerance develops in which recipients are resistant to donor APC-induced graft rejection. Thus, persistence of the graft is sufficient to induce tolerance independent of other immune interventions. Donor-specific tolerance could be adoptively transferred to immune-deficient SCID recipient mice transplanted with fresh immunogenic islet allografts, indicating that the original recipient was not simply "ignorant" of donor antigens. Interestingly, despite the fact that the original islet allograft presented only MHC class I alloantigens, CD8+ T cells obtained from tolerant animals readily collaborated with naive CD4+ T cells to reject donor-type islet grafts. Conversely, tolerant CD4+ T cells failed to collaborate effectively with naive CD8+ T cells for the rejection of donor-type grafts. In conclusion, the MHC class I+, II- islet allograft paradoxically leads to a change in the donor-reactive CD4 T cell subset and not in the CD8 subset. We hypothesize that the tolerant state is not due to direct class I alloantigen presentation to CD8 T cells but, rather, occurs via the indirect pathway of donor Ag presentation to CD4 T cells in the context of host MHC class II molecules.     

Role of STAT4 and STAT6 signaling in allograft rejection and CTLA4-Ig-mediated tolerance

STAT4(-/-) mice have impaired type 1 T cell differentiation, whereas STAT6(-/-) mice fail to generate type 2 responses. The role of type 1 and type 2 T cell differentiation in acute cardiac allograft rejection and in the induction of tolerance was examined in wild-type, STAT4(-/-), and STAT6(-/-) recipients. All recipients rejected the grafts promptly. Analysis of in situ cytokine gene expression in the allografts confirmed decreased levels of IFN-gamma in STAT4(-/-) recipients and undetectable levels of IL-4 and IL-5 in STAT6(-/-) mice. Blockade of the CD28/B7 costimulatory pathway prolonged cardiac graft survival for >100 days in 100% of wild-type and STAT4(-/-) mice. However, 14% of CTLA4-Ig-treated STAT6(-/-) mice rejected their grafts between 20 and 100 days. Moreover, of those animals followed past 100 days, 60% of the STAT6(-/-) mice rejected their grafts. Splenocytes harvested on day 145 posttransplant from CTLA4-Ig-treated rejecting STAT6(-/-) recipients were transfused into syngeneic SCID mice transplanted with donor or third party cardiac allografts. Both donor and third party grafts were rejected, indicating that the initial graft loss may be due to an immunological rejection. In contrast, when splenocytes from CTLA4-Ig-treated wild-type or nonrejecting STAT6(-/-) mice were transferred into SCID recipients, donor allografts were accepted, but third party hearts were rejected. Thus, long-term prolongation of cardiac allograft survival by CTLA4-Ig is STAT4-independent but, at least in part, STAT6-dependent. These data suggest that the balance of type 1 and type 2 T lymphocyte differentiation is not critical for acute rejection but influences the robust tolerance induced by CD28/B7 blockade in this model.     

Thymocyte antigens do not induce tolerance in the CD4+ T cell compartment.

Thymocytes fail to tolerize the developing T cell repertoire to self MHC class I (MHC I) Ags because transgenic (CD2Kb) mice expressing H-2Kb solely in lymphoid cell lineages reject skin grafts mismatched only for H-2Kb. In this study, we examined why thymocytes fail to tolerize the T cell repertoire to self MHC I Ags. The ability of CD2Kb mice to reject H-2Kb skin grafts was age dependent because CD2Kb mice older than 20 wk accepted skin grafts. T cells from younger CD2Kb mice proliferated, but did not develop cytotoxic functions in vitro in response to H-2Kb. Proliferative responses were dominated by H-2Kb-specific, CD4+ T cells rather than CD8+ T cells. Representative CD4+ T cell clones from CD2Kb mice were MHC II restricted and recognized processed H-2Kb. TCR transgenic mice were generated from one CD4+ T cell clone (361) to monitor development of H-2Kb-specific immature thymocytes when all thymic cells or lymphoid cell lineages only expressed H-2Kb. Thymocyte precursors were not eliminated and mice were not tolerant to H-2Kb when Tg361 TCR transgenic mice were intercrossed with CD2Kb mice. In contrast, all thymocyte precursors were eliminated efficiently in thymic microenvironments in which all cells expressed H-2Kb. We conclude that self MHC I Ags expressed exclusively in thymocytes do not induce T cell tolerance because presentation of processed self MHC I Ags on self MHC II molecules fails to induce negative selection of CD4+ T cell precursors. This suggests that some self Ags are effectively compartmentalized and cannot induce self-tolerance in the T cell repertoire.     

Prevention of chronic rejection in murine cardiac allografts: a comparison of chimerism- and nonchimerism-inducing costimulation blockade-based tolerance induction regimens

We have previously described a nonirradiation-based regimen combining costimulation blockade, busulfan, and donor bone marrow cells that promotes stable, high level chimerism, deletion of donor-reactive T cells, and indefinite survival of skin allografts in mice. The purpose of the current study is to determine the efficacy of this tolerance regimen in preventing acute and chronic rejection in a vascularized heart graft model and to compare this regimen with other putative tolerance protocols. Mice receiving costimulation blockade (CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40 ligand) alone or in combination with donor cells enjoyed markedly prolonged heart graft survival and initially preserved histological structure. However, tolerance was not achieved, as evidenced by the eventual onset of chronic rejection characterized by obliterative vasculopathy and the rejection of secondary skin grafts. In contrast, following treatment with costimulation blockade, busulfan, and bone marrow, heart grafts survived indefinitely without detectable signs of chronic rejection or structural damage, even 100 days after placement of a secondary donor skin graft. We detected multilineage chimerism in peripheral blood, spleen, lymph nodes, and thymus, and peripheral deletion of donor-reactive cells was complete by day 90. These findings indicate that only the CD40/CD28 blockade chimerism induction regimen prevents both acute and chronic rejection of vascularized organ transplants. Further testing of these strategies in a preclinical large animal model is warranted.