Class-1 Translation Termination Factors Are Functional Analogs of Aminoacyl-tRNAs

Reviewed and discussed are the recent data demonstrating profound functional similarity between class-1 translation termination factors (RF1 and RF2 in prokaryotes, aRF1 and eRF1 in Archaea and eukaryotes, respectively) and aminoacyl-tRNA as regards their roles in the course of translation on the ribosome. The functional analogy of these two components of the cell protein-synthesizing machinery was suggested long ago; however, only now it has received ample experimental proof. This similarity implies that decoding of the genetic information by the ribosomal machine is performed likewise at all stages of translation, though tRNA plays the main role at initiation and elongation, while the protein is most important for termination. Earlier it was found that nucleic acids (ribozymes) can operate like the protein enzymes, and now we have got evidence for the reverse: a protein (translation termination factor) can act like a nucleic acid (tRNA). Thus one can speak of exchange of molecular functions between proteins and nucleic acids in specific cases when this provides a biological benefit. Therefore, the profound chemical difference between proteins and nucleic acids is not an insuperable barrier to their functional interchangeability in certain situations.     

Making sense of mimic in translation termination

The mechanism of translation termination has long been a puzzle. Recent crystallographic evidence suggests that the eukaryotic release factor (eRF1), the bacterial release factor (RF2) and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) all mimic a tRNA structure, whereas biochemical and genetic evidence supports the idea of a tripeptide 'anticodon' in bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2. However, the suggested structural mimicry of RF2 is not in agreement with the tripeptide 'anticodon' hypothesis and, furthermore, recently determined structures using cryo-electron microscopy show that, when bound to the ribosome, RF2 has a conformation that is distinct from the RF2 crystal structure. In addition, hydroxyl-radical probings of RRF on the ribosome are not in agreement with the simple idea that RRF mimics tRNA in the ribosome A-site. All of this evidence seriously questions the simple concept of structural mimicry between proteins and RNA and, thus, leaves only functional mimicry of protein factors of translation to be investigated.     

Diverse bacterial genomes encode an operon of two genes, one of which is an unusual class-I release factor that potentially recognizes atypical mRNA signals other than normal stop codons

Background  

While all codons that specify amino acids are universally recognized by tRNA molecules, codons signaling termination of translation are recognized by proteins known as class-I release factors (RF). In most eukaryotes and archaea a single RF accomplishes termination at all three stop codons. In most bacteria, there are two RFs with overlapping specificity, RF1 recognizes UA(A/G) and RF2 recognizes U(A/G)A.     

Eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) abolishes readthrough and competes with suppressor tRNAs at all three termination codons in messenger RNA.

It is known from experiments with bacteria and eukaryotic viruses that readthrough of termination codons located within the open reading frame (ORF) of mRNAs depends on the availability of suppressor tRNA(s) and the efficiency of termination in cells. Consequently, the yield of readthrough products can be used as a measure of the activity of polypeptide chain release factor(s) (RF), key components of the translation termination machinery. Readthrough of the UAG codon located at the end of the ORF encoding the coat protein of beet necrotic yellow vein furovirus is required for virus replication. Constructs harbouring this suppressible UAG codon and derivatives containing a UGA or UAA codon in place of the UAG codon have been used in translation experiments in vitro in the absence or presence of human suppressor tRNAs. Readthrough can be virtually abolished by addition of bacterially-expressed eukaryotic RF1 (eRF1). Thus, eRF1 is functional towards all three termination codons located in a natural mRNA and efficiently competes in vitro with endogenous and exogenous suppressor tRNA(s) at the ribosomal A site. These results are consistent with a crucial role of eRF1 in translation termination and forms the essence of an in vitro assay for RF activity based on the abolishment of readthrough by eRF1.     

GTPases of the Translation Apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process involving a number of stages at which different translation factors specifically interact with ribosome. Some of these factors belong to GTP-binding proteins, or G-proteins. Due to their functioning, GTP is hydrolyzed to yield GDP and the inorganic phosphate ion P_i. Interaction with ribosome enhances GTPase activity of translation factors; i.e., ribosome plays a role of GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GTPases involved in translation interact with ribosome at every stage of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyzes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome P site and subsequent binding of the 50S subunit to the initiation complex of the 30S subunit. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) controls aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome A site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex by one codon on the ribosome. Release factor 3 (RF3) catalyzes the release of termination factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) from the ribosomal complex after completion of protein synthesis and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The functional properties of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins, the putative mechanism of GTP hydrolysis, structural features, and the functional cycles of translational GTPases are considered.     

Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3.

Termination of translation in higher organisms is a GTP-dependent process. However, in the structure of the single polypeptide chain release factor known so far (eRF1) there are no GTP binding motifs. Moreover, in prokaryotes, a GTP binding protein, RF3, stimulates translation termination. From these observations we proposed that a second eRF should exist, conferring GTP dependence for translation termination. Here, we have shown that the newly sequenced GTP binding Sup35-like protein from Xenopus laevis, termed eRF3, exhibits in vitro three important functional properties: (i) although being inactive as an eRF on its own, it greatly stimulates eRF1 activity in the presence of GTP and low concentrations of stop codons, resembling the properties of prokaryotic RF3; (ii) it binds and probably hydrolyses GTP; and (iii) it binds to eRF1. The structure of the C-domain of the X.laevis eRF3 protein is highly conserved with other Sup35-like proteins, as was also shown earlier for the eRF1 protein family. From these and our previous data, we propose that yeast Sup45 and Sup35 proteins belonging to eRF1 and eRF3 protein families respectively are also yeast termination factors. The absence of structural resemblance of eRF1 and eRF3 to prokaryotic RF1/2 and RF3 respectively, may point to the different evolutionary origin of the translation termination machinery in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. It is proposed that a quaternary complex composed of eRF1, eRF3, GTP and a stop codon of the mRNA is involved in termination of polypeptide synthesis in ribosomes.     

Immunochemical determination of cellular content of translation release factor RF4 in Escherichia coli

The biosynthesis of proteins in prokaryotes is terminated when a stop codon is present in the A-site of the 70S ribosomal complex. Four different translation termination factors are known to participate in the termination process. Release factor RF1 and RF2 are responsible for the recognition of the stop codons, and RF3 is known to accelerate the overall termination process. Release factor RF4 is a protein involved in the release of the mRNA and tRNA from the ribosomal complex. Furthermore, RF4 is involved in the proofreading in the elongation step of protein biosynthesis. The cellular contents of RF1, RF2, and RF3 were determined earlier. Here we report the cellular content of RF4 in Escherichia coli to be approximately 16,500 molecules per cell. The cells were grown in a rich medium and harvested in the beginning of the exponential growth phase. The quantifications were performed by using Western immunoblotting with radioactive iodinated streptavidin and biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins plus a highly specific monoclonal antibody against RF4 as first antibody.     

GTPases of translational apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process. It integrates multiple steps where different translation factors specifically interact with the ribosome in a precisely defined order. Among the translation factors one can find multiple GTP-binding or G-proteins. Their functioning is accompanied by GTP hydrolysis to the GDP and inorganic phosphate ion Pi. Ribosome stimulates the GTPase activity of the translation factors, thus playing a role analogues to GTPase-activating proteins (GAP). Translation factors--GTPases interact with the ribosome at all stages of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyse initiator tRNA binding to the ribosomal P-site and subsequent subunit joining. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is responsible for the aminoacyl-tRNA binding to the ribosomal A-site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyses translocation of mRNA in the ribosome by one codon, accompanied by tRNA movement between the binding sites. In its turn, release factor 3 (RF3) catalyse dissociation of the ribosomal complex with release factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) following the peptide release. This review is devoted to the functional peculiarities of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins. Particularly, to the putative GTPase activation mechanism, structure and functional cycles.     

The function, structure and regulation of E. coli peptide chain release factors

The termination of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli depends upon the soluble protein factors RF1 or RF2. RF1 catalyzes UAG and UAA dependent termination, while RF2 catalyzes UGA and UAA dependent termination. The proteins have been purified to homogeneity, their respective genes isolated, and their primary structures deduced from the DNA sequences. The sequences reveal considerable conserved homology, presumably reflecting functional similarities and a common ancestral origin. The RFs are encoded as single copy genes on the bacterial chromosome. RF2 exhibits autogenous regulation in an in vitro translation system. The mechanism of autoregulation appears to be an in-frame UGA stop codon that requires a 1+ frameshift for the continued synthesis of the protein. Frameshifting prior to the inframe stop codon occurs at a remarkably high frequency by an unknown mechanism. Future studies will be directed at understanding how RFs interact with the ribosomal components, and further defining the mechanism of RF2 frameshifting.     

第一类肽链释放因子研究进展

第一类释放因子是新生肽链释放所必需的因子,它能正确地识别终止信号,水解肽酰-tRNA酯键,释放出新合成的多肽链.它的高级结构与tRNA结构相似,从而解释了它们功能上的相似性,其氨基酸序列的高度保守区GGQ motif和三肽反密码子区在新生肽链的释放中分别执行重要的功能.     

Structural basis for translation termination by archaeal RF1 and GTP-bound EF1�� complex

When a stop codon appears at the ribosomal A site, the class I and II release factors (RFs) terminate translation. In eukaryotes and archaea, the class I and II RFs form a heterodimeric complex, and complete the overall translation termination process in a GTP-dependent manner. However, the structural mechanism of the translation termination by the class I and II RF complex remains unresolved. In archaea, archaeal elongation factor 1 alpha (aEF1α), a carrier GTPase for tRNA, acts as a class II RF by forming a heterodimeric complex with archaeal RF1 (aRF1). We report the crystal structure of the aRF1·aEF1α complex, the first active class I and II RF complex. This structure remarkably resembles the tRNA·EF–Tu complex, suggesting that aRF1 is efficiently delivered to the ribosomal A site, by mimicking tRNA. It provides insights into the mechanism that couples GTP hydrolysis by the class II RF to stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis by the class I RF. We discuss the different mechanisms by which aEF1α recognizes aRF1 and aPelota, another aRF1-related protein and molecular evolution of the three functions of aEF1α.     

Why termination tRNAs have not been found? Because they are hidden in the large ribosomal RNA

It is well known that protein synthesis in ribosomes on mRNA requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. The synthesis is assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by its anticodon is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. We discovered in the large ribosomal RNA two regions that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin, but with triplets complementary to stop codons. By analogy, we called them termination tRNAs (Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2), though they transport no amino acids, and suggested them to directly recognize stop codons. The termination factors only condition such a recognition, making it specific and reliable (of course, they fulfill the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the polypeptide and tRNA). A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis came from vertebrate mitochondria. They acquired two new stop codons, AGA and AGG (in the standard code, they are two out of six arginine codons). We revealed that the corresponding anticodons appear in Ter-tRNA1.     

Why Termination tRNAs Have Not Been Found? Because They Are Hidden in the Large Ribosomal RNA (A Hypothesis)

It is well known that protein synthesis in ribosomes on mRNA requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. The synthesis is assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by its anticodon is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. We discovered in the large ribosomal RNA two regions that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin, but with triplets complementary to stop codons. By analogy, we called them termination tRNAs (Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2), though they transport no amino acids, and suggested them to directly recognize stop codons. The termination factors only condition such recognition to make it specific and reliable (of course, they fulfill the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the polypeptide and tRNA). A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis came from vertebrate mitochondria. They acquired two new stop codons, AGA and AGG (in the standard code, they are two out of six arginine codons). We revealed that the corresponding anticodons appear in Ter-tRNA1.     

Polarity and hydrophobicity interactions in protein synthesis process

About 30 years ago, experiments found that there are polarity and hydrophobicity (P and H) correlations and affinity between amino acids and their anticodons. Although it is shown that these experimental findings are important for explaining the origins of the genetic code, the great potential of P and H interactions in investigating other bio-functions have not been fully explored. Here, through raising, discussing and answering seven relevant questions hidden in tRNA aminoacylation, the formation of peptide bonds, and the ending of translations, etc., we show our theoretical findings that the P and H correlations and affinity take vital roles in the protein synthesis process. We found the relationship between the 3' end ACCN sequences of tRNA molecules and the activated amino acids and its biological significance, the rRNAs' consensus sequences 5'NCC...TGG3' or 5'TGG...NCC3' which may perform as functional segments of rRNAs to help triggering the reaction of peptide formation, and common nature of releasing factors that the first amino acid residue of releasing factors ERF, RF1 and RF2 are all Methionine, except a few Alanine, which may be necessary for releasing the translated polypeptide and stopping the translating process. In the terms of P and H correlations and affinity, we provide explanations of why only using the poly (G) as mRNA template cannot get the poly (Gly) in experiments deciphering the genetic code, why Gly often appears in beta turns and why translational bypassing might occur when translating 5'GGAUGA on mRNA. Since amino acids and nucleotides are the subunits, respectively, for composing proteins and nucleic acids, these findings will help in further understanding interactions among the bio-macromolecules. These findings are also helpful for investigating rRNAs, further understanding the protein synthesis process and analysing similar bio-problems, and should be proved useful for experimental biologists.     

八肋游仆虫两类释放因子的相互作用

从八肋游仆虫中克隆到两类释放因子基因Eo-eRFI和Eo-eRF3。在Eo-eRF3基因的阅读框中有3个通用的终止密码子UGA,在此编码半胱氨酸。为了研究两类释放因子的相互作用,用PCR的方法对3个位点进行了定点突变,将UGA突变为通用的编码半胱氨酸的密码子UGU。突变结果经测序确认后,在大肠杆菌中获得全长Eo-eRF3的正确表达。在此基础上,构建酵母双杂交重组质粒,用该系统检测了游仆虫两类释放因子的相互作用。结果显示,两类释放因子在生物体内形成复合体,从而在较原始的真核生物中,证实了两类释放因子的相互作用关系。     

The stretch of C-terminal acidic amino acids of translational release factor eRF1 is a primary binding site for eRF3 of fission yeast.

Translation termination in eukaryotes requires a codon-specific (class-I) release factor, eRF1, and a GTP/GDP-dependent (class-II) release factor, eRF3. The model of "molecular mimicry between release factors and tRNA" predicts that eRF1 mimics tRNA to read the stop codon and that eRF3 mimics elongation factor EF-Tu to bring eRF1 to the A site of the ribosome for termination of protein synthesis. In this study, we set up three systems, in vitro affinity binding, a yeast two-hybrid system, and in vitro competition assay, to determine the eRF3-binding site of eRF1 using the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins and creating systematic deletions in eRF1. The in vitro affinity binding experiments demonstrated that the predicted tRNA-mimicry truncation of eRF1 (Sup45) forms a stable complex with eRF3 (Sup35). All three test systems revealed that the most critical binding site is located at the C-terminal region of eRF1, which is conserved among eukaryotic eRF1s and rich in acidic amino acids. To our surprise, however, the C-terminal deletion eRF1 seems to be sufficient for cell viability in spite of the severe defect in eRF3 binding when expressed in a temperature-sensitive sup45 mutant of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These results cannot be accounted for by the simple "eRF3-EF-Tu mimicry" model, but may provide new insight into the eRF3 function for translation termination in eukaryotes.     

Simultaneous binding of two proteins to opposite sides of a single transfer RNA

Transfer RNA (tRNA) is a small nucleic acid (typically 76 nucleotides) that forms binary complexes with proteins, such as aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (RS) and Trbp111. The latter is a widely distributed structure-specific tRNA-binding protein that is incorporated into cell signaling molecules. The structure of Trbp111 was modeled onto to the outer, convex side of the L-shaped tRNA. Here we present RNA footprints that are consistent with this model. This binding mode is in contrast to that of tRNA synthetases, which bind to the inside, or concave side, of tRNA. These opposite locations of binding for these two proteins suggest the possibility of a ternary complex. The formation of a tRNA synthetase--tRNA--Trbp111 ternary complex was detected by two independent methods. The results indicate that the tRNA is sandwiched between the two protein molecules. A thermodynamic and functional analysis is consistent with the tRNA retaining its native structure in the ternary complex. These results may have implications for how the translation apparatus is linked to other cellular machinery.     

Limitation of reticulocyte transfer RNA in the translation of heterologous messenger RNAs.

The effect of various tRNAs on protein synthesis was investigated using a tRNA-dependent cell-free system from Ehrlich ascites cells. Ascites cell tRNA and rabbit liver tRNA were found to promote efficient translation of globin mRNA, oviduct mRNA, and encephalomycarditis (EMC) viral RNA. In contrast, reticulocyte tRNA participated efficiently only in the translation of globin mRNA; the translation of oviduct mRNA AND EMC viral RNA in the presence of reticulocyte tRNA resulted in the synthesis of relatively few large mature proteins and the accumulation of discrete, smaller polypeptides. These results suggest that isoaccepting tRNA species required for the synthesis of ovalbumin and EMC viral protein (but not hemoglobin) are probably functionally absent in reticulocyte tRNA, causing a premature, nonrandom termination of synthesis of these proteins. This provides preliminary evidence that variations in tRNA populations, frequently observed between different cell types, are large enough to define and perhaps regulate the proteins that the cell is capable of synthesizing.