Stem cell factor-induced leukotriene B4 production cooperates with eotaxin to mediate the recruitment of eosinophils during allergic pleurisy in mice.

The understanding of the mechanisms underlying eosinophil recruitment in vivo may aid in the development of novel strategies for the treatment of allergic disorders. In this study, we investigated the role of chemokines in the cascade of events leading to eosinophil recruitment in a stem cell factor (SCF)- and leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4))-dependent allergic pleurisy model in mice. The intrapleural administration of the eosinophil-active chemokines eotaxin, RANTES, and macrophage-inflammatory protein 1alpha (MIP-1alpha) induced a time- and dose-dependent eosinophil recruitment. Pretreatment with anti-eotaxin, but not anti-RANTES or anti-MIP-1alpha, blocked the recruitment of eosinophils following Ag challenge of sensitized animals, and significant eotaxin immunoreactivity was detected in the pleural cavity of these animals. Similarly, only the anti-eotaxin inhibited the eosinophil recruitment induced by injection of SCF in naive animals. However, blockade of SCF did not inhibit the release of eotaxin after Ag challenge of sensitized mice. Akin to its effects on SCF and in the allergic reaction, eotaxin-induced eosinophil recruitment was blocked by the LTB(4) receptor antagonist CP105696. Nevertheless, SCF, but not eotaxin, appeared to regulate the endogenous release of LTB(4) after Ag challenge. Finally, we show that low doses of eotaxin synergized with LTB(4) to induce eosinophil recruitment in the pleural cavity. Overall, the present results show that eotaxin and SCF-induced LTB(4) cooperate to induce eosinophil recruitment into sites of allergic inflammation. Cooperation between inflammatory mediators must be an important phenomenon in vivo, explaining both the ability of lower concentrations of mediators to induce a full-blown functional response and the effectiveness of different strategies at inhibiting these responses.     

IL-16 activates plasminogen-plasmin system and promotes human eosinophil migration into extracellular matrix via CCR3-chemokine-mediated signaling and by modulating CD4 eosinophil expression

Increased eosinophil counts are a major feature of asthmatic airways. Eosinophil recruitment requires migration through epithelium and tissue extracellular matrix by activation of proteases. We assessed the capacity of IL-16, a CD4(+) cell chemotactic factor, to induce migration of eosinophils through a reconstituted basement membrane and evaluated the proteases, mediators, and receptors involved in this migration. IL-16 added to lower chambers of Invasion Chambers elicited eosinophil migration through Matrigel. This effect was decreased by inhibition of the plasminogen-plasmin system (Abs against urokinase plasminogen activator receptor or plasminogen depletion), but not by anti-matrix metalloproteinase-9 Abs. Abs against CD4 also inhibited IL-16-induced eosinophil migration. At the baseline level, few eosinophils (4.6% positive cells with a mean fluorescence of 0.9) expressed surface membrane CD4, while most permeabilized eosinophils (68% positive cells with a mean fluorescence of 18) express the CD4 Ag. TNF-pretreatment increased surface membrane CD4(+) expression by 6-fold as previously described, and increased IL-16-induced cell migration by 2.2-fold. Incubation of eosinophils with IL-16 also increased surface membrane CD4 expression by 5.4-fold, supporting the role of CD4 as receptor for IL-16. Abs against CCR3, eotaxin, or RANTES blocked IL-16-induced migration. In conclusion, IL-16 promotes eosinophil migration in vitro, by activating the plasminogen-plasmin system and increasing the membrane expression of its receptor. This effect is initiated via CD4 and mediated via the release of CCR3 ligand chemokines. Interestingly, most eosinophils express intracellular CD4. Hence, IL-16 may play an important role in the recruitment of blood eosinophils to the bronchial mucosa of asthmatics.     

Vascular adhesion and transendothelial migration of eosinophil leukocytes

Tissues respond to injury with inflammation in an effort to protect and repair the damaged site. During inflammation, leukocytes typically accumulate in response to certain chemicals produced within the tissue itself. The passage of leukocytes through the vascular lumen into tissues occurs in several phases, including rolling, activation, firm adhesion, transendothelial migration, and subendothelial migration. Although infiltration of eosinophil leukocytes is one of the most important aspects of allergic inflammatory reactions, eosinophils also participate in nonallergic inflammation. Eosinophil accumulation is regulated not only by endothelial adhesion molecules, but also by interactions between eosinophil adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix elements. This review summarizes the regulation of eosinophil leukocyte adhesion and migration. A better understanding of eosinophil recruitment responses may lead to the development of novel therapeutics for chronic allergic diseases.     

Biological activity of leukotriene B4 analogs: inhibition of guinea pig eosinophil migration in vitro by the 2,6-disubstituted pyridine analogs U-75,302 and U-75,485.

A "late phase" antigen-induced bronchoalveolar eosinophilia has been demonstrated in ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs (1,2). This in vivo response to antigen inhalation can be inhibited by a 2,6-disubstituted pyridine analog of LTB4, U-75,302(2) (3). In the present study, the mechanism of the drug action was studied by assessing the activity of U-75,302 and a second analog, U-75,485 to displace [3H]-leukotriene B4 binding at the guinea pig eosinophil membrane, as well as their action as chemoattractants or inhibitors of the directional migration of guinea pig eosinophils in vitro. Radioligand competition experiments demonstrated that both analogs interacted strongly with the high affinity LTB4 binding sites on guinea pig eosinophil membrane. Both analogs are powerful chemoattractants for guinea pig eosinophils since they induced directional migration of guinea pig eosinophils when administered alone. In addition, when the cells were treated with either analog and their chemotaxis response was measured in response to a natural chemoattractant, both U-75,302 and U-75,485 at concentrations of 0.1 to 100 microM dose dependently inhibited the LTB4 induced chemotaxis response. The EC50s obtained for U-75,302 and U-75,485 as inhibitors of LTB4 induced guinea pig eosinophil chemotaxis were estimated to be 11.5 +/- 5.5 microM and 5.4 +/- 2.5 microM respectively. Under the same conditions, they had no significant effect upon eosinophil migration induced by zymosan activated plasma at concentrations below 100 microM. We suggest that the inhibition of antigen-induced eosinophil infiltration in guinea pig airway in vivo by U-75,302 or U-75,485 may be a result of partial antagonism or desensitization at the LTB4 receptor level of guinea pig eosinophils.     

Leukotriene B4 is essential for selective eosinophil recruitment following allergen challenge of CD4+ cells in a model of chronic eosinophilic inflammation

Subcutaneous heat-coagulated egg white implants (EWI) induce chronic, intense local eosinophilia in mice, followed by asthma-like responses to airway ovalbumin challenge. Our goal was to define the mechanisms of selective eosinophil accumulation in the EWI model. EWI carriers were challenged i.p. with ovalbumin and the contributions of cellular immunity and inflammatory mediators to the resulting leukocyte accumulation were defined through cell transfer and pharmacological inhibition protocols. Eosinophil recruitment required Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II expression, and was abolished by the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor antagonist CP 105.696, the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor BWA4C and the 5-lipoxygenase activating protein inhibitor MK886. Eosinophil recruitment in EWI carriers followed transfer of: a) CD4+ (but not CD4-) cells, harvested from EWI donors and restimulated ex vivo; b) their cell-free supernatants, containing LTB4. Restimulation in the presence of MK886 was ineffective. CC chemokine receptor ligand (CCL)5 and CCL2 were induced by ovalbumin challenge in vivo. mRNA for CCL17 and CCL11 was induced in ovalbumin-restimulated CD4+ cells ex vivo. MK886 blocked induction of CCL17. Pretreatment of EWI carriers with MK886 eliminated the effectiveness of exogenously administered CCL11, CCL2 and CCL5. In conclusion, chemokine-producing, ovalbumin-restimulated CD4+ cells initiate eosinophil recruitment which is strictly dependent on LTB4 production.     

Lysophosphatidylcholines inhibit human eosinophil activation and suppress eosinophil migration in vivo

Eosinophils are important multifaceted effector cells involved in allergic inflammation. Following allergen challenge, eosinophils and other immune cells release secreted phospholipases, generating lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs). LPCs are potent lipid mediators, and serum levels of LPCs associate with asthma severity, suggesting a regulatory activity of LPCs in asthma development. As of yet, the direct effects of LPCs on eosinophils remain unclear. In the present study, we tested the effects of the major LPC species (16:0, 18:0 and 18:1) on eosinophils isolated from healthy human donors. Addition of saturated LPCs in the presence of albumin rapidly disrupted cholesterol-rich nanodomains on eosinophil cell membranes and suppressed multiple eosinophil effector responses, such as CD11b upregulation, degranulation, chemotaxis, and downstream signaling. Furthermore, we demonstrate in a mouse model of allergic cell recruitment, that LPC treatment markedly reduces immune cell infiltration into the lungs. Our observations suggest a strong modulatory activity of LPCs in the regulation of eosinophilic inflammation in vitro and in vivo.     

Mechanisms underlying eosinophil trafficking and their relevance in vivo

After their formation in the bone marrow, eosinophils circulate with a short half-life and are distributed throughout the body, especially in mucosal and sub-mucosal regions. Although a small amount of these cells are normally seen in healthy tissue, blood and tissue eosinophilia is a hallmark of helminthic and allergic diseases. The role of eosinophils in the normal physiology of mucosal tissues is not understood, but there is good evidence to demonstrate that these cells protect the host at least against some intestinal helminths, specially those with a lung cycle. In addition, there are now many data that support a role for eosinophils in the pathophysiology of allergic diseases, such as asthma. Because helminthic diseases have been largely controlled in developed countries, there has been much interest in the development of drugs which affect eosinophil migration and/or activation in the tissue and which may, thus, be useful in the treatment of allergic conditions. The understanding of the mechanisms controlling eosinophil trafficking and/or activation are essential in the development of anti-eosinophil-based therapeutic strategies. The present paper reviews aspects of eosinophil biology with emphasis on the role of eosinophils in parasitic infections and allergy, the basic mechanisms underlying the trafficking of eosinophils into tissue and how these can be modulated pharmacologically.     

Migration of eosinophils across endothelial cell monolayers: interactions among IL-5, endothelial-activating cytokines, and C-C chemokines

Eosinophils are the predominant cell type recruited in inflammatory reactions in response to allergen challenge. The mechanisms of selective eosinophil recruitment in allergic reactions are not fully elucidated. In this study, the ability of several C-C chemokines to induce transendothelial migration (TEM) of eosinophils in vitro was assessed. Eotaxin, eotaxin-2, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-4, and RANTES induced eosinophil TEM across unstimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in a concentration-dependent manner with the following rank order of potency: eotaxin approximately eotaxin-2 > MCP-4 approximately RANTES. The maximal response induced by eotaxin or eotaxin-2 exceeded that of RANTES or MCP-4. Preincubation of eosinophils with anti-CCR3 Ab (7B11) completely blocked eosinophil TEM induced by eotaxin, MCP-4, and RANTES. Activation of endothelial cells with IL-1beta or TNF-alpha induced concentration-dependent migration of eosinophils, which was enhanced synergistically in the presence of eotaxin and RANTES. Anti-CCR3 also inhibited eotaxin-induced eosinophil TEM across TNF-alpha-stimulated HUVEC. The ability of eosinophil-active cytokines to potentiate eosinophil TEM was assessed by investigating eotaxin or RANTES-induced eosinophil TEM across resting and IL-1beta-stimulated HUVEC in the presence or absence of IL-5. The results showed synergy between IL-5 and the chemokines but not between IL-5 and the endothelial activator IL-1beta. Our data suggest that eotaxin, eotaxin-2, MCP-4, and RANTES induce eosinophil TEM via CCR3 with varied potency and efficacy. Activation of HUVEC by IL-1beta or TNF-alpha or priming of eosinophils by IL-5 both promote CCR3-dependent migration of eosinophils from the vasculature in conjunction with CCR3-active chemokines.     

CC chemokine ligand 1 promotes recruitment of eosinophils but not Th2 cells during the development of allergic airways disease

One of the characteristic features of allergic asthma is recruitment of large numbers of inflammatory cells including eosinophils and Th2 lymphocytes to the lung. This influx of inflammatory cells is thought to be a controlled and coordinated process mediated by chemokines and their receptors. It is thought that distinct, differential expression of chemokine receptors allows selective migration of T cell subtypes in response to the chemokines that bind these receptors. Th2 cells preferentially express CCR8 and migrate selectively to its ligand, CC chemokine ligand (CCL)1. We studied the role of the CCR8 ligand, CCL1, in the specific recruitment of Th2 cells and eosinophils to the lung in a murine model of allergic airway disease. We have demonstrated for the first time that CCL1 is up-regulated in the lung following allergen challenge. Moreover, a neutralizing Ab to CCL1 reduced eosinophil migration to the lung, but had no effect on recruitment of Th2 cells following allergen challenge. In addition, there was no change in airway hyperresponsiveness or levels of Th2 cytokines. In a Th2 cell transfer system of pulmonary inflammation, anti-CCL1 also failed to affect recruitment of Th2 cells to the lung following allergen challenge. Significantly, intratracheal instillation of rCCL1 increased recruitment of eosinophils but not Th2 cells to the lung in allergen-sensitized and -challenged mice. In summary, our results indicate that CCL1 is important for the pulmonary recruitment of eosinophils, rather than allergen-specific Th2 cells, following allergen challenge.     

Decreased expression of membrane IL-5 receptor alpha on human eosinophils: I. Loss of membrane IL-5 receptor alpha on airway eosinophils and increased soluble IL-5 receptor alpha in the airway after allergen challenge

IL-5 is a key cytokine for eosinophil maturation, recruitment, activation, and possibly the development of inflammation in asthma. High concentrations of IL-5 are present in the airway after Ag challenge, but the responsiveness of airway eosinophils to IL-5 is not well characterized. The objectives of this study were to establish, following airway Ag challenge: 1) the expression of membrane (m)IL-5Ralpha on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) eosinophils; 2) the responsiveness of these cells to exogenous IL-5; and 3) the presence of soluble (s)IL-5Ralpha in BAL fluid. To accomplish these goals, blood and BAL eosinophils were obtained from atopic subjects 48 h after segmental bronchoprovocation with Ag. There was a striking reduction in mIL-5Ralpha on airway eosinophils compared with circulating cells. Furthermore, sIL-5Ralpha concentrations were elevated in BAL fluid, but steady state levels of sIL-5Ralpha mRNA were not increased in BAL compared with blood eosinophils. Finally, BAL eosinophils were refractory to IL-5 for ex vivo degranulation, suggesting that the reduction in mIL-5Ralpha on BAL eosinophils may regulate IL-5-mediated eosinophil functions. Together, the loss of mIL-5Ralpha, the presence of sIL-5Ralpha, and the blunted functional response (degranulation) of eosinophils to IL-5 suggest that when eosinophils are recruited to the airway, regulation of their functions becomes IL-5 independent. These observations provide a potential explanation for the inability of anti-IL-5 therapy to suppress airway hyperresponsiveness to inhaled Ag, despite a reduction in eosinophil recruitment.     

Neutrophils as a novel source of eosinophil cationic protein in IgE-mediated processes

The production of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in IgE-mediated diseases has been associated mainly with eosinophils, although no IgE-dependent ECP release has been observed in these cells. Because there is increasing evidence of neutrophil participation in allergic processes, we have examined whether human neutrophils from allergic patients were able to produce ECP by an IgE-dependent mechanism. After challenge with specific Ags to which the patients were sensitized, ECP release was detected in the culture medium. Furthermore, intracellular protein was detected by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, and Western blotting. Expression at both mRNA and de novo protein synthesis were detected, respectively, by RT-PCR and radiolabeling with (35)S. Ag effect was mimicked by cell treatment with anti-IgE Abs or Abs against FcepsilonRI and galectin-3 (FcepsilonRI>galectin-3), but not against FcepsilonRII. These observations represent a novel view of neutrophils as possible source of ECP in IgE-dependent diseases.     

Endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 mediate the adhesion of eosinophils to endothelial cells in vitro and are expressed by endothelium in allergic cutaneous inflammation in vivo.

We have compared the adhesion of 51Cr-labeled eosinophils and neutrophils to cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cell (EC) monolayers that have been stimulated with IL-1, TNF, or LPS. Each agent stimulated the adhesion to EC of both eosinophils and neutrophils in a similar dose- and time-dependent manner. F(ab')2 fragments of mAb 1.2B6 (anti-endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule (ELAM)-1) and mAb 6.5B5 (anti-intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1) each inhibited partially, and to a similar extent, eosinophil and neutrophil adhesion to EC monolayers prestimulated with TNF (10 ng/ml) for 6 h. Greater inhibition of both eosinophil and neutrophil adhesion was achieved by combining the effects of mAb 1.2B6 with either mAb 6.5B5 or mAb TS1/18 (anti-CD18). These observations indicate that both ELAM-1 and ICAM-1 are involved in the adhesion of eosinophils and neutrophils to EC stimulated with TNF. In order to determine whether these molecules are expressed in vivo during allergen-induced late phase allergic responses in the skin, human skin biopsies were examined at 6 h after Ag or saline challenge with the use of an alkaline phosphatase-staining technique. Both ELAM-1 and ICAM-1 were expressed with greater intensities in Ag-challenged biopsies, suggesting that these molecules may be involved in granulocyte recruitment in vivo. The similarities we have established between mechanisms of eosinophil and neutrophil adhesion to cytokine-stimulated EC suggests that factors other than differential leukocyte-EC adhesion may be responsible for the selective accumulation of eosinophils at sites of allergic inflammation.     

Cutting edge: prostaglandin D2 enhances leukotriene C4 synthesis by eosinophils during allergic inflammation: synergistic in vivo role of endogenous eotaxin

In addition to the well-recognized ability of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) to regulate eosinophil trafficking, we asked whether PGD2 was also able to activate eosinophils and control their leukotriene C4 (LTC4)-synthesizing machinery. PGD2 administration to presensitized mice enhanced in vivo LTC4 production and formation of eosinophil lipid bodies-potential LTC4-synthesizing organelles. Immunolocalization of newly formed LTC4 demonstrated that eosinophil lipid bodies were the sites of LTC4 synthesis during PGD2-induced eosinophilic inflammation. Pretreatment with HQL-79, an inhibitor of PGD synthase, abolished LTC4 synthesis and eosinophil lipid body formation triggered by allergic challenge. Although PGD2 was able to directly activate eosinophils in vitro, in vivo PGD2-induced lipid body-driven LTC4 synthesis within eosinophils was dependent on the synergistic activity of endogenous eotaxin acting via CCR3. Our findings, that PGD2 activated eosinophils and enhanced LTC4 synthesis in vivo in addition to the established PGD2 roles in eosinophil recruitment, heighten the interest in PGD2 as a target for antiallergic therapies.     

In vivo airway eosinophil accumulation does not enhance antigen- or propranolol-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs

BACKGROUND: Chronic airway eosinophil accumulation is characteristic of asthma. However, it remains unclear whether airway eosinophils enhance or reduce release of chemical mediators and/or action of the released mediators in the airways in vivo, because previous investigators have indicated that eosinophil-derived factors such as histaminase and arylsulfatase may alter the allergic reaction by metabolizing chemical mediators. Recently, we have developed a guinea pig model of propranolol-induced bronchoconstriction (PIB), which is mediated by lipid mediators such as thromboxane A2 (TxA2), cysteinyl leukotrienes (cLTs) and platelet activation factor (PAF). This study was conducted to explain the influence of airway eosinophil accumulation on antigen-induced bronchoconstriction and the following PIB, both of which are mediated by lipid mediators. METHODS: Guinea pigs were transnasally treated with 75 microg/kg of polymyxin-B or vehicle twice a week for a total of 3 weeks. Guinea pigs were anesthetized and treated with diphenhydramine hydrochloride, and then artificially ventilated 24 h after the last administration of polymyxin-B or vehicle followed by passive sensitization. Propranolol at a concentration of 10 mg/ml was inhaled 20 min after an aerosolized antigen challenge. RESULTS: The proportion of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained 15 min after the propranolol inhalation was significantly increased in guinea pigs treated with polymyxin-B compared with the vehicle. The polymyxin-B treatment did not affect antigen-induced bronchoconstriction or the following PIB. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that eosinophils accumulated in the airways by polymyxin-B does not affect release of chemical mediators induced by antigen or propranolol inhalation, or action of released mediators in vivo.     

α-Galactosylceramide-induced airway eosinophilia is mediated through the activation of NKT cells

Invariant NKT (iNKT) cells bridge innate and adaptive immune responses, resulting in the expansion of Ag-specific B and T cell responses. α-Galactosylceramide (α-GalCer), the most studied glycolipid that activates iNKT cells, has been proposed to be an effective adjuvant against infections and tumors. We found that the activation of iNKT cells by intranasal injection of α-GalCer induced airway eosinophilia in naive mice. Eosinophils, which mediate tissue damage and dysfunction by secreting mediators, play important roles in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of how eosinophils are recruited to the lung by α-GalCer. Our results demonstrated that α-GalCer-induced eosinophil inflammation was mediated through iNKT cells. These cells secreted IL-5 to recruit eosinophils directly to the lung and/or secreted IL-4 and IL-13 to recruit eosinophils indirectly by inducing lung epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblast to secrete the eosinophil chemoattractant eotaxin. In addition, in the OVA-alum murine model of allergic asthma, α-GalCer administration in OVA-immunized mice also increased airway eosinophilia after challenge. Given our findings, intranasal administration of α-GalCer induced airway eosinophilic inflammation in both naive and allergic mice. Hence, it remains to be determined whether the activation of iNKT cells would be applicable in therapeutics for human diseases.     

IL-4 induces adherence of human eosinophils and basophils but not neutrophils to endothelium. Association with expression of VCAM-1.

The present studies were performed to explore potentially selective mechanisms of leukocyte adhesion in an attempt to understand how preferential recruitment of eosinophils and basophils might occur during allergic and other inflammatory reactions. Stimulation of human vascular endothelial cells for 24 h with IL-4 (30 to 1,000 U/ml) induced adhesion for eosinophils (up to approximately four-fold of control) and basophils (up to approximately twofold of control) but not neutrophils (less than 125% of control). Analysis of endothelial expression of adhesion molecules by flow cytometry revealed that IL-4 treatment induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expression without significantly affecting the expression of other adhesion molecules, namely endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (ELAM-1) or intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). The concentration-response curve for IL-4-induced VCAM-1 expression paralleled that for adhesion. Endothelial cells stimulated with IL-4 expressed adhesive properties for eosinophils by 3 h; the response increased steadily during a 24-h time course study. Eosinophils and basophils adhered to plates coated with a recombinant form of VCAM-1. This adhesion was blocked with antibodies to VCAM-1 but not ELAM-1. mAb directed against either VCAM-1 or VLA-4 inhibited (by approximately 75%) the binding of eosinophils and basophils to IL-4-stimulated endothelial cells. Because VLA-4 and VCAM-1 have been demonstrated to bind to each other in other adhesion systems, these results suggest that IL-4 stimulates eosinophil and basophil adhesion by inducing endothelial cell expression of VCAM-1 which binds to eosinophil and basophil VLA-4. The lack of expression of VLA-4 on neutrophils and the failure of IL-4 to stimulate neutrophil adherence support this conclusion. It is proposed that local release of IL-4 in vivo in allergic diseases or after experimental allergen challenge may partly explain the enrichment of eosinophils and basophils (vs neutrophils) observed in these situations.     

CD48 is an allergen and IL-3-induced activation molecule on eosinophils

Eosinophils are involved in a variety of allergic, parasitic, malignant, and idiopathic disorders by releasing a variety of factors including specific granule proteins, lipid mediators, and proinflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines and chemokines. In addition, they interact with various cell types in the inflamed tissue. Yet, the mechanism of eosinophil activation is still poorly understood. Recently, we described the expression and function of the CD2-subfamily of receptors and especially 2B4 on human eosinophils. In this study we focus on CD48, the high-affinity ligand of 2B4. CD48 is a GPI-anchored protein involved in cellular activation, costimulation, and adhesion, but has not been studied on eosinophils. We demonstrate that human eosinophils from atopic asthmatics display enhanced levels of CD48 expression and that IL-3 up-regulates CD48 expression. Furthermore, cross-linking CD48 on human eosinophils triggers release of eosinophil granule proteins. Assessment of CD48 expression in a murine model of experimental asthma revealed that CD48 is induced by allergen challenge and partially regulated by IL-3. Additionally, anti-IL-3 reduces CD48 expression and the degree of airway inflammation. Thus, CD48 is an IL-3-induced activating receptor on eosinophils, likely involved in promoting allergic inflammation.     

Endogenous platelet-activating factor is critically involved in effector functions of eosinophils stimulated with IL-5 or IgG

Eosinophil activation and subsequent release of inflammatory mediators are implicated in the pathophysiology of allergic diseases. Eosinophils are activated by various classes of secretagogues, such as cytokines (e.g., IL-5), lipid mediators (e.g., platelet-activating factor (PAF)), and Ig (e.g., immobilized IgG). However, do these agonists act directly on eosinophils or indirectly through the generation of intermediate active metabolites? We now report that endogenous PAF produced by activated eosinophils plays a critical role in eosinophil functions. Human eosinophils produced superoxide when stimulated with immobilized IgG, soluble IL-5, or PAF. Pretreating eosinophils with pertussis toxin abolished their responses to these stimuli, suggesting involvement of a metabolite(s) that acts on G proteins. Indeed, PAF was detected in supernatants from eosinophils stimulated with IgG or IL-5. Furthermore, structurally distinct PAF antagonists, including CV6209, hexanolamine PAF, and Y-24180 (israpafant), inhibited IgG- or IL-5-induced superoxide production and degranulation. Previous reports indicated that exogenous PAF stimulates eosinophil eicosanoid production through formation of lipid bodies. We found in this study that IgG or IL-5 also induces lipid body formation and subsequent leukotriene C4 production mediated by endogenous PAF. Finally, inhibition of cytosolic phospholipase A2, one of the key enzymes involved in PAF synthesis, attenuated both PAF production and effector functions of eosinophils. These findings suggest that endogenous PAF plays important roles in eosinophil functional responses to various exogenous stimuli, such as cytokines and Igs. Therefore, inhibition of PAF synthesis or action may be beneficial for the treatment of eosinophilic inflammation.     

Functional properties of guinea pig eosinophil leukotriene B4 receptor.

It is currently thought that pulmonary eosinophils play a proinflammatory role in bronchial asthma. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is being considered as an important mediator in regulating eosinophil function because of its potent activities in inducing leukocyte chemotaxis, chemokinesis, degranulation, and aggregation. Because the LTB4 receptor has not been characterized in eosinophils, we report in this study the presence of a functional high affinity receptor for LTB4 on guinea pig (GP) eosinophils. Scatchard analysis of saturation binding studies yielded a Kd of 1.4 +/- 0.2 nM (mean +/- SEM, n = 3) and a Bmax of 1.6 +/- 0.4 pmol/mg of protein for LTB4 in GP eosinophil membranes. A linear Scatchard plot was obtained, suggesting that GP eosinophil membranes expressed only a single high affinity LTB4 receptor population. Saturation binding studies in whole cells also yielded a linear Scatchard plot, with a Kd of 2.8 +/- 0.96 nM (mean +/- SEM, n = 4) and a Bmax of 4 x 10(4) +/- 6 x 10(3) receptors/cell. Competitive binding studies using several compounds with structures similar to that of LTB4 showed that these agents bound to the receptor in the following descending order of affinity (Ki, nM): LTB4 (0.96) less than TB3 (1.0) greater than 20-hydroxy-LTB4 (3.5) greater than 12(R)-hydroxy-5,8,14-cis,10-trans-eicosatetraenoic acid (20) greater than 12(S)-hydroxy-5,8,14-cis,10-trans-eicosatetraenoic acid (231) greater than 20-carboxy-LTB4 (350) greater than 5(S),12(S)-dihydroxy-6,10-trans,8,14-cis-eicosatetraenoic acid (541). This rank order of potency in binding affinity correlates closely with the ability of these compounds to induce both chemotaxis and superoxide anion generation. Analysis of the structure-activity relationship suggests that the 12R-hydroxyl group and a cis double bond at the C-6 position are important for optimal agonist binding to the LTB4 receptor present in GP eosinophil membranes. The results suggest that LTB4 may be an important chemoattractant for eosinophils in GP and may induce the release of reactive oxygen species from this cell.