Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans

Bacillus penetrans inhibited penetration by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) into tomato roots in the laboratory and greenhouse. Spores from this Florida population of B. penetrans attached to J2 of M. javanica, M. incognita, and M. arenaria. A greater proportion of J2 of M. javanica were infected than were J2 of either M. incognita or M. arenaria, and a greater number of spores attached to M. incognita than to M. arenaria.     

Host-Parasite Relationships of Meloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita on Susceptible Soybean

Pathogenicity and reproduction of single and combined populations of Meloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita on a susceptible soybean (Glycine max cv. Davis) were investigated. Significant galling and egg mass production were observed on roots of greenhouse-grown soybean inoculated with M. arenaria and M. incognita, in combination and individually. M. arenaria produced more galls and egg masses than M. incognita, whereas in combined inoculation with both nematode species, gall and egg production was intermediate. In growth chamber tests, inoculations with M. arenaria and M. incognita, singly or in combination, produced more galls and egg masses at 30 C than at 25 C. At 25 C, M. arenaria alone produced significantly more galls and egg masses than the combined M. arenaria plus M. incognita, while M. incognita produced the fewest. At 30 C, numbers of egg masses produced by M. arenaria did not differ significantly from combined M. arenaria and M. incognita. In temperature tank tests, M. incognita produced more galls and egg masses at 28 C than at 24 C soil temperature. In contrast, numbers of galls, egg masses, and eggs of M. arenaria were slightly higher at 24 C than at 28 C. Combined inoculum of both nematode species produced greater numbers of galls at 24 C than at 28 C.     

Role of Nematodes,Nematicides, and Crop Rotation on the Productivity and Quality of Potato,Sweet Potato,Peanut, and Grain Sorghum

The objective of this experiment was to determine the effects of fenamiphos 15G and short-cycle potato (PO)-sweet potato (SP) grown continuously and in rotation with peanut (PE)-grain sorghum (GS) on yield, crop quality, and mixed nematode population densities of Meloidogyne arenaria, M. hapla, M. incognita, and Mesocriconema ornatum. Greater root-gall indices and damage by M. hapla and M. incognita occurred on potato than other crops. Most crop yields were higher and root-gall indices lower from fenamiphos-treated plots than untreated plots. The total yield of potato in the PO-SP and PO-SP-PE-GS sequences increased from 1983 to 1985 in plots infested with M. hapla or M. arenaria and M. incognita in combination and decreased in 1986 to 1987 when root-knot nematode populations shifted to M. incognita. The total yields of sweet potato in the PO-SP-PE-GS sequence were similar in 1983 and 1985, and declined each year in the PO-SP sequence as a consequence of M. incognita population density increase in the soil. Yield of peanut from soil infested with M. hapla increased 82% in fenamiphos-treated plots compared to untreated plots. Fenamiphos treatment increased yield of grain sorghum from 5% to 45% over untreated controls. The declining yields of potato and sweet potato observed with both the PO-SP and PO-SP-PE-GS sequences indicate that these crop systems should not be used longer than 3 years in soil infested with M. incognita, M. arenaria, or M. hapla. Under these conditions, these two cropping systems promote a population shift in favor of M. incognita, which is more damaging to potato and sweet potato than M. arenaria and M. hapla.     

Host Suitability and Response of Asparagus Cultivars to Meloidogyne Species and Races

The host-parasite relationships of asparagus and Meloidogyne spp. were examined under greenhouse and microplot conditions. Meloidogyne species and races differed greatly in their ability to reproduce on asparagus seedlings. Meloidogyne hapla generally failed to reproduce, and M. javanica, M. arenaria race 1, and M. incognita race 3 reproduced poorly, with a reproduction factor (Rf = final population/initial population) usually < 1.0. Only M. arenaria race 2 and M. incognita races 1 and 4 reproduced consistently on all asparagus cultivars tested (Rf typically 1-11). No effect of M. incognita race 4 on host growth was detected. Meloidogyne arenaria race 2 and M. incognita race 1 had slight negative effects (5-10%) on plant and root growth.     

Effects of Planting Date,Small Grain Crop Destruction,Fallow, and Soil Temperature on the Management of Meloidogyne incognita

The effects of planting date, rye (Secale cereale cv. Wren Abruzzi) and wheat (Triticura aestivum cv. Coker 797), crop destruction, fallow, and soil temperature on managing Meloidogyne incognita race 1 were determined in a 2-year study. More M. incognita juveniles (J2) and egg-producing adults were found in roots of rye planted 1 October than in roots of rye planted 1 November and wheat planted 1 November and 1 December. Numbers of M. incognita adults with and without egg masses were near or below detectable levels in roots of rye planted 1 November and wheat planted 1 November and 1 December. Meloidogyne incognita survived the mild winters in southern Georgia as J2 and eggs. The destruction of rye and wheat as a trap crop 1 March suppressed numbers of J2 in the soil temporarily but did not provide long-term benefits for susceptible crops that followed. In warmer areas where rye and wheat are grown in winter, reproduction of M. incognita may be avoided by delaying planting dates until soil temperature declines below the nematode penetration threshold (18 C), but no long-term benefits should be expected. The temperature threshold may be an important consideration in managing M. incognita population densities in areas having lower winter soil temperatures than southern Georgia.     

Comparative Studies on Root Invasion,Root Galling,and Fecundity of Three Meloidogyne spp. on a Susceptible Tobacco Cultivar

Root invasion, root galling, and fecundity of Meloidogyne javanica, M. arenaria, and M. incognita on tobacco was compared in greenhouse and controlled environment experiments. Significantly more M. javanica than M. arenaria or M. incognita larvae were found in tobacco roots at 2, 4, and 6 d after inoculation. Eight days after inoculation there were significantly more M. arenaria and M. javanica than M. incognita larvae. Ten days after inoculation no significant differences were found among the three Meloidogyne species inside the roots. Galls induced by a single larva or several larvae of M. javanica were significantly larger than galls induced by M. incognita: M. arenaria galls were intermediate in size. Only slight differences in numbers of egg masses or numbers of eggs produced by the three Meloidogyne species were observed up to 35 d after inoculation.     

Application of Isoelectric Focusing to the Taxonomic Identification of Meloidogyne spp.

Meloidogyne incognita, M. arenaria, M. hapla, and M. javanica were distinguishable from each other by isoelectric focusing (IEF) of nematode egg proteins. Proteins extracted from larvae and adults of Hoplolaimus columbus and from eggs of Heterodera glycines had distinctive profiles, also. Protein profiles from eggs, preparasitic larvae and egg-laying adults of M. incognita showed differences. It was necessary to compare samples run at the same time to ensure reliability.     

Reproductive Variability of Field Populations of Meloidogyne spp. on Grape Rootstocks

Variability in penetration, development, and reproduction of two resistance-breaking field pathotypes (pt.) of Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, and a population of mixed Meloidogyne spp. virulent to grape hosts were compared on two resistant Vitis rootstocks ''Freedom'' and ''Harmony'' in separate tests. ''Cabernet Sauvignon'' was included as a susceptible host to all four nematode populations. Secondstage juveniles (J2) of the mixed population failed to penetrate Freedom roots. By contrast, 6% of J2 in the M. incognita population penetrated Freedom roots but did not develop beyond the swollen J2 stage. The two resistance-breaking populations of M. arenaria differed in their virulence except on susceptible roots of Cabernet Sauvignon. More J2 of M. arenaria pt. Freedom penetrated Freedom roots and reached adult stage than did M. arenaria pt. Harmony. Later life stages of M. arenaria pt. Freedom occurred earlier and in greater numbers in Harmony roots than did M. arenaria pt. Harmony. Reproduction of M. arenaria pt. Freedom was greater in Freedom and Harmony roots than M. arenaria pt. Harmony. Thus, one population of M. arenaria is highly virulent and the other is moderately virulent.     

Penetration of Susceptible and Resistant Tobacco Cultivars by Meloidogyne Juveniles

Rates of penetration of Meloidogyne incognita, M. arenaria, and M. javanica into tobacco cultivars NC2326 (susceptible to all three species) and K399 (resistant to M. incognita) and a breeding line that had been selected for resistance to M. incognita were compared. Meloidogyne incognita penetrated NC2326 rapidly during the first 24 hours after inoculation. Numbers of M. incognita continued to increase gradually through the 14-day experiment. Higher numbers of M. incognita were observed in the roots of K399 during the first 24 hours than were observed in NC2326. The number of M. incognita in K399 peaked 4 days after inoculation, then declined rapidly as the nematodes that were unable to establish a feeding site left the root or died. Numbers of M. incognita in the breeding line followed the same pattern as with K399, but in lower numbers. Numbers of M. arenaria showed little difference between cultivars until 7 days after inoculation, then numbers increased in NC2326. Numbers of M. javanica fluctuated in all cultivars, resulting in patterns of root population different from those observed for M. incognita or M. arenaria. Resistance to M. incognita appears to be expressed primarily as an inability to establish a feeding site rather than as a barrier to penetration. Some resistance to M. arenaria may also be present in K399 and the breeding line.     

Monoclonal Antibodies to Secretory Granules in Esophageal Glands of Meloidogyne Species

Monoclonal antibodies to secretory granules in the dorsal or subventral esophageal glands were generated by injecting BALB/c mice with immunogens from preparasitic second-stage juveniles (J2) of Meloidogyne incognita. Antibodies specific for secretory granules in the J2 subventral esophageal glands or the dorsal gland were identified by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. Only antibodies that reacted with granules in the J2 dorsal gland reacted with the esophageal gland lobe ofM. incognita adult females. The antibodies also reacted with secretory granules in both types of esophageal glands in M. javanica and M. arenaria J2 but not with granules in esophageal glands of Heterodera glycines J2.     

Effects of Resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris on Development of Meloidogyne Species

Use of resistant Phaseolus vulgaris germplasm has a potential role in limiting damaging effects of Meloidogyne spp. on bean production. Effects of two genetic resistance systems in common bean germptasm on penetration and development of Meloidogyne spp. were studied under growth room conditions at 22°C to 25°C. Nemasnap (gene system 1) and G1805 (gene system 2) were inoculated with second-stage juveniles (J2) of M. incognita race 2 and M. arenaria race 1, respectively; Black Valentine was used as the susceptible control. Up to 7 days after inoculation, there were no differences in numbers of M. incognita J2 penetrating roots of Black Valentine and Nemasnap; subsequently, more nematodes were present in Black Valentine roots (P < 0.05). More nematodes reached advanced stages of development in Black Valentine than in Nemasnap roots (P < 0.05). Total numbers of M. arenaria were greater in Black Valentine than in G 1805 roots from 14 days after inoculation (P < 0.05). Advanced stages of development occurred earlier and in greater numbers in Black Valentine plants than in G1805 plants. In these studies, resistance to M. incognita race 2 and M. arenaria race 1 in bean germplasm, which contain gene system 1 and gene system 2, respectively, was expressed by delayed nematode development rather than by differential penetration compared with susceptible plants.     

Soybean Yield as Related to Rates of 1,3-Dichloropropene Applied at Planting for Management of Root-Knot Disease

1,3-Dichloropropene (1,3-D) at rates of 17.2 to 51.6 liters/ha applied 3 days preplant or at planting significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the amount of galling on roots of soybean grown in sites infested with Meloidogyne incognita or M. arenaria. Populations of M. incognita second-stage juveniles at harvest were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by all treatments. Only the 51.6-liters/ ha treatments and a 3-day preplant 34.4-liters/ha application significantly reduced at-harvest juvenile infestations of M. arenaria. Equations (P < 0.001) relating soybean yield and 1,3-D dosage indicated soybean phytotoxicity at the upper range of the nematicide rates. The maximum yield response was predicted at 40 liters/ha applied 3 days preplant at both infestation sites. Maximum yield response was predicted with 30 liters/ha applied at planting to M. incognita-infested soil and from 25 liters/ha applied at planting to M. arenaria-infested soil. Application of economic factors suggested that management of M. incognita may be cost effective with at-plant treatments of low rates of 1,3-D. Yield responses of M. arenaria-infected soybean exposed to similar treatments were insufficient to justify their use at prevailing prices.     

Stage-specific Differences in Lectin Binding to the Surface of Anguina tritici and Meloidogyne incognita

The occurrence and distribution of several lectin binding sites on the outer surfaces of eggs, preparasitic second-stage juveniles (J2), parasitic second-stage juveniles (PJ2), females, and males of two tylenchid nematodes, Anguina tritici and Meloidogyne incognita race 3, were compared. In both species, a greater variety of lectins bound to the eggs than to other life stages; lectin binding to eggs was also more intense than it was to other life stages. Species-specific differences also occurred. More lectins bound to the amphids or amphidial secretions of M. incognita J2 than to the amphids or amphidial secretions of A. tritici J2. Lectins also bound to the amphids or amphidial secretions of adult male and female A. tritici, but binding to the cuticle occurred only at the head and tail and was not consistent in all specimens. Canavalia ensiformis and Ulex europaeus lectins bound specifically to the outer cuticle of M. incognita. Several other lectins bound nonspecifically. Oxidation of the cuticle with periodate under mild conditions, as well as pretreatment of the nematodes with lipase, markedly increased the binding of lectins to the cuticle of A. tritici J2 but not, in most cases, to M. incognita J2 or eggs of either species.     

Predicting Damage of Meloidogyne incognita on Watermelon

Quantitative growth response of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) sensitive to Meloidogyne incognita is poorly understood. Determination of soil population densities of second-stage juveniles (J2) of M. incognita with Baermann funnel extraction often is inaccurate at low soil temperatures. In greenhouse experiments, three sandy soils were inoculated with dilution series of population densities of eggs or J2 of M. incognita and planted in small containers to watermelon ‘Royal Sweet’ or subjected to Baermann funnel extraction. After five weeks of incubation in the greenhouse bioassay plants in egg-inoculated soils, gall numbers on watermelon roots related more closely to inoculated population densities than J2 counts after Baermann funnel extraction. In April 2004, perpendicularly-inserted tubes (45-cm diameter, 55-cm deep) served as microplots where two methyl bromide-fumigated sandy soils were inoculated with egg suspensions of M. incognita at 0, 100, 1,000 or 10,000 eggs/100 cm³ of soil in 15-cm depth. At transplanting of 4-week old watermelon seedlings, soils were sampled for the bioassay or for extraction of J2 by Baermann funnel. In the Seinhorst function of harvested biomass in relation to nematode numbers, decline of biomass with increasing population densities of M. incognita was accurately modeled by the inoculated eggs (R² = 0.93) and by the counts of galls on the bioassay roots (R² = 0.98); but poorly by J2 counts (R² = 0.68). Threshold levels of watermelon top dry weight to M. incognita were 122 eggs/100 cm³ soil, 1.6 galls on bioassay roots, or 3.6 J2/100 cm³ of soil. Using the bioassay in early spring for predicting risk of nematode damage appeared useful in integrated pest management systems of watermelon.     

Response of Resistant Soybean Plant Introductions to Meloidogyne incognita in Field Microplots

The response of two soybean plant introductions, PI 96354 and PI 417444, highly resistant to Meloidogyne incognita, to increasing initial soil population densities (Pi) (0, 31, 125, and 500 eggs/100 cm³ soil) of M. incognita was studied in field microplots for 2 years. The plant introductions were compared to the cultivars Forrest, moderately resistant, and Bossier, susceptible to M. incognita. Averaged across years, the yield suppressions of Bossier, Forrest, PI 417444, and PI 96354 were 97, 12, 18, and < 1%, respectively, at the highest Pi when compared with uninfested control plots. Penetration of roots by second-stage juveniles (J2) increased linearly with increasing Pi at 14 days after planting. At the highest Pi, 62% fewer J2 were present in roots of PI 96354 than in roots of the other resistant genotypes. Soil population densities of M. incognita were lower on both plant introductions than on Forrest. At 75 and 140 days after planting, PI 96354 had the lowest number of J2 in the soil, with 49% and 56% fewer than Forrest at the highest Pi. The resistance genes in PI 96354 should be useful in a breeding program to improve the level of resistance to M. incognita in soybean cultivars.     

Morphological Comparison of Head Shape and Stylet Morphology of Second-stage Juveniles of Meloidogyne Species

Head shape and stylet morphology of second-stage juveniles of one population each of M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla were compared by light microscopy. Excised stylets of each species were also compared by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Differences in head morphology were observed only between M. hapla and the other three species. In SEM, differences in stylet size, shape, and relative distance of the dorsal esophageal gland orifice to the base of the stylet were evident. Differences in stylet morphology between M. incognita and M. javanica could not he detected by light microscopy, but M. arenaria and M. hapla could be distinguished from each other and from the other two species. Head shape and styler morphology of second-stage juveniles are considered useful taxonomic characters.     

Effect of Carbamate,Organophosphate, and Avermectin Nematicides on Oxygen Consumption by Three Meloidogyne spp.

Second-stage juveniles (I2) of Meloidogyne arenaria consumed more oxygen (P ≤ 0.05) than M. incognita J2, which in turn consumed more than M. javanica J2 (4,820, 4,530, and 3,970 μl per hour per g nematode dryweight, respectively). Decrease in oxygen consumption depended on the nematicide used. Except for aldicarb, there was no differential sensitivity among the three nematode species. Meloidogyne javanica had a greater percentage decrease (P ≤ 0.05) in oxygen uptake when treated with aldicarb, relative to the untreated control, than either M. arenaria or M. incognita. Meloidogyne javanica J2 had a greater degree of recovery from fenamiphos or aldicarb intoxication, after subsequent transfer to water, than did M. incognita. This finding may relate to differential sensitivity among Meloidogyne spp. in the field. Degree of respiratory inhibition and loss of nematode motility for M. javanica after exposure to the nematicides were positively correlated (P ≤ 0.05).     

Differential Response to Root-Knot Nematodes in Prunus Species and Correlative Genetic Implications

Responses of 17 Prunus rootstocks or accessions (11 from the subgenus Amygdalus and 6 from the subgenus Prunophora) were evaluated against 11 isolates of Meloidogyne spp. including one M. arenaria, four M. incognita, four M. javanica, one M. hispanica, and an unclassified population from Florida. Characterization of plant response to root-knot nematodes was based on a gall index rating. Numbers of females and juveniles plus eggs in the roots were determined for 10 of the rootstocks evaluated against one M. arenaria, one M. incognita, one M. javanica, and the Florida isolate. These 10 rootstocks plus Nemaguard and Nemared were retested by growing three different rootstock genotypes together in containers of soil infested individually with each of the above four isolates. Garfi and Garrigues almonds, GF.305 and Rutgers Red Leaf peaches, and the peach-almond GF.677 were susceptible to all isolates. Differences in resistance were detected among the other rootstocks of the subgenus Amygdalus. The peach-almond GF.557 and Summergrand peach were resistant to M. arenaria and M. incognita but susceptible to M. javanica and the Florida isolate. Nemaguard, Nemared, and its two hybrids G x N no. 15 and G x N no. 22 were resistant to all but the Florida isolate. In the subgenus Prunophora, Myrobalan plums P.1079, P.2175, P.2980, and P.2984; Marianna plum 29C; and P. insititia plum AD.101 were resistant to all isolates. Thus, two different genetic systems of RKN resistance were found in the subgenus Amygdalus: one system acting against M. arenaria and M. incognita, and another system also acting against M. javanica. Prunophora rootstocks bear a complete genetic system for resistance also acting against the Florida isolate. The hypotheses on the relationships between these systems and the corresponding putative genes of resistance are presented.     

Histopathology of Selected cultivars of Tobacco infected with Meloidogyne species

Rates of nematode penetration and the histopathology of root infections in fluecured tobacco cultivars ''McNair-944,'' ''Speight G-28,'' and ''NC-89'' with either Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. hapla, or M. javanica were investigated. Penetration of root tips by juveniles of all species into the M. incognita-resistant NC-89 and G-28 was much less than that on the susceptible McNair-944. Few juveniles of M. incognita were detected in resistant cultivars 7 and 14 days after inoculation. Infection sites exhibited some cavities and extensive necrotic tissue at 14 days; less necrotic tissue and no intact nematodes were observed 35 days after inoculation. Although some females of M. arenaria reached maturity and produced eggs, considerable necrosis was induced in the resistant cultivars. Meloidogyne hapla and M. javanica developed on all cultivars, but there was necrotic tissue at some infection sites in the resistant cultivars. The occurrence of single multistructured nuclei in the syncytia of most M. hapla infections differed from the numerous small nuclei found in syncytia caused by the other three species.     

Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Hoplolaimus columbus on Davis Soybean

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were performed to determine if an interaction exists between Meloidogyne incognita and Hoplolaimus columbus on Davis soybean. Greenhouse tests were performed with three population levels of M. incognita and H. columbus (0, 1,500, 6,000/1.5-liter pot) separately and in all combinations. Dry root weight (DRT) declined nonlinearly and dry shoot weight (DST) declined linearly with respect to increasing initial populations of M. incognita and H. columbus. When the two nematode species were added to the soil together, the amount of DRT and DST suppression by one species was dependent on the initial level of the concomitant species. The final root population of M. incognita or H. columbus declined linearly with increasing initial population density of the concomitant species. H. columbus suppressed M. incognita populations in the soil nonlinearly, but M. incognita had no effect on H. columbus.