Unintended effects of genetic modifications and methods of their analysis in plants

The problem of unintended effects, which may be caused by genetic modification of plants, is analyzed. The factors that provoke the occurrence of unintended effects in genetically engineered plants, the consequences caused by the influence of these factors, and the possibility to minimize such effects by the use of improved methods of genetic engineering are discussed. Modern methodological approaches that can be applied to the analysis of unintended effects considered as a stage of safety assessment of transgenic plants, especially the methods of molecular profiling with the use of different “-omic” technologies, are described.     

Genetic and environmental influence on maize kernel proteome

Comparative targeted compositional analysis is currently an important element in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Profiling methods have been suggested as nontargeted tools to improve the detection of possible unintended effects. In this study, the capability of 2-dimensional electrophoresis to detect significant differences among seven conventional maize (Zea mays) cultivars grown in six different locations in Germany during two consecutive seasons was evaluated. Besides maize genotype, both geographic location and season had a significant effect on protein profiles. Differences as high as 55- and 53-fold in the quantity of specific proteins were recorded, the median observed difference being around 6- and 5-fold between the genotypes and growing locations, respectively. Understanding the variation in the quantity of individual proteins should help to put the variation of endogenous proteins and the novel proteins in the genetically modified plants in perspective. This together with the targeted analyses the profiling methods, including proteomics, could also help to get a deeper insight into the unintended alterations that might have occurred during the genetic modification process.     

Non-uniform distribution pattern for differentially expressed genes of transgenic rice Huahui 1 at different developmental stages and environments

DNA microarray analysis is an effective method to detect unintended effects by detecting differentially expressed genes (DEG) in safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) crops. With the aim to reveal the distribution of DEG of GM crops under different conditions, we performed DNA microarray analysis using transgenic rice Huahui 1 (HH1) and its non-transgenic parent Minghui 63 (MH63) at different developmental stages and environmental conditions. Considerable DEG were selected in each group of HH1 under different conditions. For each group of HH1, the number of DEG was different; however, considerable common DEG were shared between different groups of HH1. These findings suggested that both DEG and common DEG were adequate for investigation of unintended effects. Furthermore, a number of significantly changed pathways were found in all groups of HH1, indicating genetic modification caused everlasting changes to plants. To our knowledge, our study for the first time provided the non-uniformly distributed pattern for DEG of GM crops at different developmental stages and environments. Our result also suggested that DEG selected in GM plants at specific developmental stage and environment could act as useful clues for further evaluation of unintended effects of GM plants.     

Comparison of tuber proteomes of potato varieties, landraces, and genetically modified lines

Crop improvement by genetic modification remains controversial, one of the major issues being the potential for unintended effects. Comparative safety assessment includes targeted analysis of key nutrients and antinutritional factors, but broader scale-profiling or "omics" methods could increase the chances of detecting unintended effects. Comparative assessment should consider the extent of natural variation and not simply compare genetically modified (GM) lines and parental controls. In this study, potato (Solanum tuberosum) proteome diversity has been assessed using a range of diverse non-GM germplasm. In addition, a selection of GM potato lines was compared to assess the potential for unintended differences in protein profiles. Clear qualitative and quantitative differences were found in the protein patterns of the varieties and landraces examined, with 1,077 of 1,111 protein spots analyzed showing statistically significant differences. The diploid species Solanum phureja could be clearly differentiated from tetraploid (Solanum tuberosum) genotypes. Many of the proteins apparently contributing to genotype differentiation are involved in disease and defense responses, the glycolytic pathway, and sugar metabolism or protein targeting/storage. Only nine proteins out of 730 showed significant differences between GM lines and their controls. There was much less variation between GM lines and their non-GM controls compared with that found between different varieties and landraces. A number of proteins were identified by mass spectrometry and added to a potato tuber two-dimensional protein map.     

Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics?

In Europe the commercialization of food derived from genetically modified plants has been slow because of the complex regulatory process and the concerns of consumers. Risk assessment is focused on potential adverse effects on humans and the environment, which could result from unintended effects of genetic modifications: unintended effects are connected to changes in metabolite levels in the plants. One of the major challenges is how to analyze the overall metabolite composition of GM plants in comparison to conventional cultivars, and one possible solution is offered by metabolomics. The ultimate aim of metabolomics is the identification and quantification of all small molecules in an organism; however, a single method enabling complete metabolome analysis does not exist. Given a comprehensive extraction method, a hierarchical strategy--starting with global fingerprinting and followed by complementary profiling attempts--is the most logical and economic approach to detect unintended effects in GM crops.     

Transgenic Plants: New Biological System or New Properties of Plant-<Emphasis Type="Italic">Agrobacterium</Emphasis> Symbiosis?

Transgenic plants have become one of the most important subjects of inquiry in biotechnology. Disputes about possible consequences of the use of genetically modified organisms still continue. Biological status of genetically modified plants is unsettled. Common criteria for assessment of the consequences of genetic transformation are lacking. Causes for and mechanisms of unforeseen consequences of transformation remain obscure. Methods of genetic engineering of plants are based on plant-Agrobacterium interaction. Transgenic plants are regarded as super-species systems produced as a result of artificial plant-Agrobacterium symbioses. Mechanisms of interaction between the members of symbiosis are very intricate and labile. Incorporation of foreign genes into T-DNA modifies characteristics of a bacterial symbiont. As a result, interaction between the organisms changes. The systems of inherent plant immunity are activated and plant metabolism is accordingly reorganized. These changes are the main reason for unintended effects of transgenosis. The intensity of response to transformation depends on the characteristics of the inserted target gene.     

Metabolite profiling of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</Emphasis> (L.) plants transformed with an antisense chalcone synthase gene

A metabolite profiling study has been carried out on Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. ecotype Wassilewskija and a series of transgenic lines of the ecotype transformed with a CHS (chalcone synthase) antisense construct. Compound identifications by LC/MS and ¹H NMR are discussed. The glucosinolate composition in rosette leaves was shown to vary naturally within this ecotype. Relatively modest environmental changes had a strong effect on the wild type level of flavonoids and some sinapate esters but much less effect on the glucosinolates. Potentially a reduction in the level of flavonoids could be expected in the transgenic lines relative to the wild type. In practice the reductions achieved were highly variable both between lines and within a given line on different occasions when the plants were grown. Possible reasons for this variability are discussed with reference to current models of gene silencing. The metabolite profiles of the transgenic lines were examined for unintended effects of the modification. An apparently major effect on the glucosinolate composition was shown to result from an unusual genetic variation in the ecotype and not from the modification. The modification did produce a different but much more subtle change in the levels of certain glucosinolates.Funding: EU 5th Framework Programme (Project QLK1-1999-00765, GMOCARE) and the BBSRC (UK) Core Strategic Grant.     

Assessment of unanticipated unintended effects of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms: a controversy worthy of pursuit?

A typical risk hypothesis addressed during the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) plants for cultivation is that the novel traits intentionally introduced into GM plants do not adversely affect non‐target organisms (NTOs). However, genetic modification may potentially also lead to unintended changes in the GM plant which could raise safety concerns. Therefore, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) advocates the characterization of ecological interactions between the GM plant and representative NTOs as part of the ERA of GM plants for cultivation in the European Union. Yet, this requirement is not unanimously accepted by stakeholders. Here, we present EFSA's approach to assess potential adverse effects on NTOs and summarize some of the stakeholders' views, mostly opposing EFSA's position on scientific grounds.     

Transgenic plants and biosafety: science, misconceptions and public perceptions

One usually thinks of plant biology as a non-controversial topic, but the concerns raised over the biosafety of genetically modified (GM) plants have reached disproportionate levels relative to the actual risks. While the technology of changing the genome of plants has been gradually refined and increasingly implemented, the commercialization of GM crops has exploded. Today's commercialized transgenic plants have been produced using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation or gene gun-mediated transformation. Recently, incremental improvements of biotechnologies, such as the use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a selectable marker, have been developed. Non-transformation genetic modification technologies such as chimeraplasty will be increasingly used to more precisely modify germplasm. In spite of the increasing knowledge about genetic modification of plants, concerns over ecological and food biosafety have escalated beyond scientific rationality. While several risks associated with GM crops and foods have been identified, the popular press, spurred by colorful protest groups, has left the general public with a sense of imminent danger. Reviewed here are the risks that are currently under research. Ecological biosafety research has identified potential risks associated with certain crop/transgene combinations, such as intra- and interspecific transgene flow, persistence and the consequences of transgenes in unintended hosts. Resistance management strategies for insect resistance transgenes and non-target effects of these genes have also been studied. Food biosafety research has focused on transgenic product toxicity and allergenicity. However, an estimated 3.5 x 10(12) transgenic plants have been grown in the U.S. in the past 12 years, with over two trillion being grown in 1999 and 2000 alone. These large numbers and the absence of any negative reports of compromised biosafety indicate that genetic modification by biotechnology poses no immediate or significant risks and that resulting food products from GM crops are as safe as foods from conventional varieties. We are increasingly convinced that scientists have a duty to conduct objective research and to effectively communicate the results--especially those pertaining to the relative risks and potential benefits--to scientists first and then to the public. All stakeholders in the technology need more effective dialogues to better understand risks and benefits of adopting or not adopting agricultural biotechnologies.     

How genetic modification of roots affects rhizosphere processes and plant performance

Genetic modification of plants has become common practice. However, root-specific genetic modifications have only recently been advocated. Here, a review is presented regarding how root-specific modifications can have both plant internal and rhizosphere-mediated effects on aboveground plant properties and plant performance. Plant internal effects refer to pleiotropic processes such as transportation of the modified gene product. Rhizosphere-mediated effects refer to altered plant-rhizosphere interactions, which subsequently feed back to the plant. Such plant-soil feedback mechanisms have been demonstrated both in natural systems and in crops. Here how plant internal and rhizosphere-mediated effects could enhance or counteract improvements in plant properties for which the genetic modification was intended is discussed. A literature survey revealed that rice is the most commonly studied crop species in the context of root-specific transgenesis, predominantly in relation to stress tolerance. Phytoremediation, a process in which plants are used to clean up pollutants, is also often an objective when transforming roots. These two examples are used to review potential effects of root genetic modifications on shoots. There are several examples in which root-specific genetic modifications only lead to better plant performance if the genes are specifically expressed in roots. Constitutive expression can even result in modified plants that perform worse than non-modified plants. Rhizosphere effects have rarely been examined, but clearly genetic modification of roots can influence rhizosphere interactions, which in turn can affect shoot properties. Indeed, field studies with root-transformed plants frequently show negative effects on shoots that are not seen in laboratory studies. This might be due to the simplified environments that are used in laboratories which lack the full range of plant-rhizosphere interactions that are present in the field.     

Opportunities and surprises in crops modified by transgenic technology: metabolic engineering of benzylisoquinoline alkaloid, gossypol and lysine biosynthetic pathways

The development of new or improved traits in plants, whether that is through traditional genetic modification and selection or through transgenic technologies, is associated with the potential risk of unintended changes with harmful or unacceptable consequences. The greater definition and precision of transgenic modification and the regulatory oversight of such technology may, however, confer advantages in safety and efficacy. This bears considerable relevance to the use of transgenic-based metabolic engineering in agricultural trait development. Metabolic engineering seeks to modify the amounts or chemical structures within selected biosynthetic routes without introducing inadvertent effects on other metabolic pathways. Examples discussed here include attempts to; (i) modify benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis in poppy, (ii) improve the nutritional value of maize by increasing levels of free lysine, and (iii) increase the nutritional value of cottonseed by eliminating gossypol production. Clearly, evaluation of the efficacy (and unintended consequences) of such approaches is vital. A role for metabolomics in the compositional and metabolite analyses of new plant varieties derived from transgenic-based metabolic engineering is discussed. Major themes discussed in this review include; (i) the heightened level of scrutiny associated with genetically modified (GM) crop evaluations has markedly contributed to the safety in the adoption of transgenic technology, and (ii) the nature of any introduced trait may prove more relevant to safety assessments than the means by which the trait is introduced.     

Possible consequences of the overlap between the CaMV 35S promoter regions in plant transformation vectors used and the viral gene VI in transgenic plants

Multiple variants of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (P35S) are used to drive the expression of transgenes in genetically modified plants, for both research purposes and commercial applications. The genetic organization of the densely packed genome of this virus results in sequence overlap between P35S and viral gene VI, encoding the multifunctional P6 protein. The present paper investigates whether introduction of P35S variants by genetic transformation is likely to result in the expression of functional domains of the P6 protein and in potential impacts in transgenic plants. A bioinformatic analysis was performed to assess the safety for human and animal health of putative translation products of gene VI overlapping P35S. No relevant similarity was identified between the putative peptides and known allergens and toxins, using different databases. From a literature study it became clear that long variants of the P35S do contain an open reading frame, when expressed, might result in unintended phenotypic changes. A flowchart is proposed to evaluate possible unintended effects in plant transformants, based on the DNA sequence actually introduced and on the plant phenotype, taking into account the known effects of ectopically expressed P6 domains in model plants.     

Influence of transgenesis on genome variability in cucumber lines with a thaumatin II gene

The development of new plant varieties by genetic modification aims at improving their features or introducing new qualities. However, concerns about the unintended effects of transgenes and negative environmental impact of genetically modified plants are an obstacle for the use of these plants in crops. To analyze the impact of transgenesis on plant genomes, we analyze three cucumber transgenic lines with an introduced thaumatin II gene. After genomes sequencing, we analyzed the transgene insertion site and performed variant prediction. As a result, we obtained similar number of variants for all analyzed lines (average of 4307 polymorphisms), with high abundance in one region of chromosome 4. According to SnpEff analysis, the presence of genomic variants generally does not influence the genome functionality, as less than 2% of polymorphisms have high impact. Moreover, analysis indicates that these changes were more likely induced by in vitro culture than by the transgenesis itself. The insertion site analysis shows that the region of transgene integration could cause changes in gene expression, by gene disruption or loss of promoter region continuity.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12298-021-00990-8.     

转基因作物非预期效应与自然变异的比较和鉴别

筛查转基因作物非预期效应遇到的最大难题是难以鉴别其非预期效应和自然变异.从转基因作物非预期效应与自然变异的发生机制、食用安全风险和遗传特性的比较分析阐述两者在发生机制及遗传特性方面的差异和特征,为设计减少自然变异干扰的非预期效应筛查模式和方案提供重要启示.     

Achievements and problems of genetic engineering of Crucifereceae plants

Plants of the Brassicaceae family are important oil, vegetable and feed crops. The review is devoted to the latest achievements in genetic engineering of plants from this family. Results concerning development of effective methods both of Agrobacteium-mediated transformation and of direct gene uptake are considered. Particularly, possibilities of plant genetic modification with the aim to improve agronomically and commercially important traits are stressed. Problems of biologically safe introduction of transgenic plants into agricultural production are discussed.     

Evaluation of a non-targeted "omic" approach in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants

Genetically modified plants must be approved before release in the European Union, and the approval is generally based upon a comparison of various characteristics between the transgenic plant and a conventional counterpart. As a case study, focusing on safety assessment of genetically modified plants, we here report the development and characterisation of six independently transformed ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA lines modified in the flavonoid biosynthesis. Analyses of integration events and comparative analysis for characterisation of the intended effects were performed by PCR, quantitative Real-time PCR, and High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Analysis by cDNA microarray was used as a non-targeted approach for the identification of potential unintended effects caused by the transformation. The results revealed that, although the transgenic lines possessed different types of integration events, no unintended effects were identified. However, we found that the majority of genes showing differential expression were identified as stress-related genes and that environmental conditions had a large impact on the expression of several genes, proteins, and metabolites. We suggest that the microarray approach has the potential to become a useful tool for screening of unintended effects, but state that it is crucial to have substantial information on the natural variation in traditional crops in order to be able to interpret "omics" data correctly within the framework of food safety assessment strategies of novel plant varieties, including genetically modified plant varieties.