Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy as Second-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Effect of Treatment Duration and Antibiotic Resistance on the Eradication Rate in Korea

Background:  The eradication rate of first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment is only 70–85% and has been decreasing due to the increase in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for H. pylori infection based on treatment duration.
Methods:  We prospectively enrolled 227 patients that were found to have persistent H. pylori infection after first-line proton-pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin triple therapy. Patients were randomized to 1-week (112 patients) and 2-week (115 patients) quadruple therapy with tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., meteronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. and esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. The eradication rate, drug compliance, and adverse events were compared based on treatment duration.
Results:  The eradication rates were 72/112 (64.3%, 95% CI: 0.504–0.830) and 71/92 (77.2%, 0.440–0.749) with 1-week group, and 95/115 (82.6%, 1.165–2.449) an 88/94 (93.6%, 1.213–5.113) with 2-week group by intention-to-treat therapy ( p  = .002) and per-protocol analysis ( p  = .001), respectively. The adverse events increased as the treatment durations increased from 7 to 14 days (20.0 and 42.5%, respectively, p  < .001). However, there was no significant difference in the patient compliance or the rate of major adverse events between the 1- and 2-week groups (6.3 and 12.5%, respectively, p  = .133).
Conclusion:  Two-week bismuth-containing quadruple therapy was more effective than the 1-week treatment, and should be considered for second-line treatment in Korea.     

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy Success Regarding Different Treatment Period Based on Clarithromycin or Metronidazole Triple-Therapy Regimens

Background: The study compares the eradication success of standard first-line triple therapies of different durations (7, 10, and 14 days).
Materials and Methods: A total of 592 naive Helicobacter pylori -positive patients were randomized to receive pantoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin or metronidazole for 14 days (PACl14 or PAM14), 10 days (PACl10 or PAM10), or 7 days (PACl7 or PAM7). H. pylori eradication was assessed by histological, microbiological, and rapid urease examination.
Results: The intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses have shown no overall statistically significant differences between the eradication success of PACl and PAM treatment groups (ITT p  = .308, PP p  = .167). Longer treatment duration has yielded statistically significant increase in eradication success for clarithromycin (ITT p  = .004; PP p  = .004) and metronidazole (ITT p  = .010; PP p  = .034) based regimens. Namely, PACl10, PACl14, and PAM14 protocols resulted in eradication success exceeding 80% in ITT and 90% in PP analysis. Primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole equals 8.2% and 32.9%, respectively. Prolonging the metronidazole-based treatment duration in patients with resistant strains resulted in statistically significant higher eradication success.
Conclusions: For all antimicrobial combinations, 14 days protocols have led to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication success when compared to 10 and 7 days, respectively. Prolonging the treatment duration can overcome the negative effect of metronidazole resistance. Only PAM14, PACl10 protocols achieved ITT success > 80% and should be recommended as the first line eradication treatment in Croatia.     

Annual Change of Primary Resistance to Clarithromycin among Helicobacter pylori Isolates from 1996 through 2008 in Japan

Background: Recent studies have shown that the combination of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin is one of the best choices for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. However, increasing number of cases of H. pylori infection showing resistance to clarithromycin therapy has been reported and this is currently the main cause of eradication failure. We investigated the annual changes of the antimicrobial susceptibility to clarithromycin, amoxicillin and minocycline during a period of 12 years in Japan. Methods: This study comprised 3521 patients (mean age (SD), 55.4 (13.7) years‐old, 2467 males and 1054 females) positive for H. pylori as assessed by microaerobic bacterial culture from 1996 through 2008. All patients were previously untreated for H. pylori and were enrolled in the study to assess primary resistance to the three antibiotics. Results: The overall primary resistance to clarithromycin, amoxicillin and minocycline were 16.4%, (577/3521), 0.03% (1/3521) and 0.06% (2/3521), respectively. From1996 through 2004, the resistance rate to clarithromycin increased gradually to approximately 30% and then it remained without marked fluctuation since 2004. Analysis by gender showed a significant increase (p < .0001) in resistance rate to clarithromycin among females (217/1057, 20.6%) compared to males (360/2467, 14.6%). Analysis by age, disclosed significantly (p < .0001) higher resistance rate to clarithromycin in patients of more than 65‐years‐old compared to the younger population. Conclusions: The resistance rate of H. pylori infection to clarithromycin in Japan has increased gradually to approximately 30% from 1996 through 2004, and remained unchanged since 2004. Elderly and females were at high risk of having resistance to clarithromycin. Our results suggested that the level of clarithromycin resistance in Japan has now risen to the point where it should no longer be used as empiric therapy.     

High Efficacy of 14‐Day Triple Therapy‐Based,Bismuth‐Containing Quadruple Therapy for Initial Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: The success rate of currently recommended 7‐day triple therapy with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin has fallen into the unacceptable range. It is urgent to look for a new strategy to treat the infection of Helicobacter pylori. Aims: To observe the efficacy of triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori treatment. Methods: A total of 160 patients with functional dyspepsia who were Hp+ were randomly assigned into two groups. Regimen: Omeprazole 20 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Clarithromycin 500 mg and Bismuth Potassium Citrate 220 mg, twice a day. Eighty patients received 7‐day quadruple therapy and 80 patients received the same therapy for 14 days. Six weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath test. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin of clinical isolates were determined by the twofold agar dilution method. Results: Fourteen‐day therapy led to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication success when compared to 7‐day therapy in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (93.7 vs 80.0%; p = .01), and the per‐protocol analysis (97.4 vs 82.0%; p = .0016). The H. pylori resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin were 42.1, 18.0 and 0%. Fourteen‐day therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Conclusions: Addition bismuth and prolonging treatment duration can overcome H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and decrease the bacterial load. Fourteen‐day triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy achieved ITT success rate 93% and could be recommended as the first line eradication regimen.     

Impact of furazolidone-based quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after previous treatment failures

Background. One week of quadruple therapy including metronidazole is recommended for Helicobacter pylori treatment failures after first line therapy regardless of resistance status. This study investigated whether a quadruple regimen containing furazolidone could be effective as a third‐line (salvage) therapy. Methods. All patients with previous H. pylori treatment failure after a clarithromycin‐metronidazole ± amoxicillin combination plus acid suppression were given lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid), tripotassiumdicitratobismuthate 240 mg bid, tetracycline 1 g bid, metronidazole 400 mg (PPI‐B‐T‐M) three times a day (tid) for 1 week. In the case of treatment failure with this second‐line therapy, the same regimen was applied for 1 week except for using furazolidone 200 mg bid (PPI‐B‐T‐F) instead of metronidazole (sequential study design). Results. Eighteen consecutive patients were treated with PPI‐B‐T‐M. Eleven of those 18 remained H. pylori positive (38.9% cured). Pretherapeutic metronidazole resistance was associated with a lower probability of eradication success (10% vs. 75%, p= .04). Ten of these 11 patients agreed to be retreated by PPI‐B‐T‐F. Final cure of H. pylori with PPI‐B‐T‐F was achieved in 9/10 patients (90%) nonresponsive to PPI‐B‐T‐M. Conclusions. In the presence of metronidazole resistance, PPI‐B‐T‐M as a recommended second‐line therapy by the Maastricht consensus conference achieved unacceptable low cure rates in our metronidazole pretreated population. In this population, metronidazole based second‐line quadruple therapy may be best suited in case of a metronidazole‐free first line‐regimen (e.g. PPI‐clarithromycin‐amoxicillin) or a low prevalence of metronidazole resistance. Furazolidone in the PPI‐B‐T‐F combination does not have a cross‐resistance potential to metronidazole and is a promising salvage option after a failed PPI‐B‐T‐M regimen.     

Second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: 10-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy versus 2-week quadruple therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of 10-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy versus 2-week quadruple therapy for the second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients who had failed previous H. pylori eradication on standard triple therapy were randomized to one of two regimens: 1, moxifloxacin (400 mg q.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.), and esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) for 10 days (the 10MEA group), or 2, esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.), tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate (300 mg q.i.d.), metronidazole (500 mg t.i.d.), and tetracycline 500 mg (q.i.d.) for 14 days (the 14EBMT group). The eradication rates, drug compliances, and side-effect rates of these two regimens were compared. RESULTS: Eradication rates by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses in the 10MEA and 14EMBT groups were 71.9% and 82.6%, and 71.7% and 90.5% (p = .973 and .321), respectively. The 10MEA group was significantly superior to the 14EMBT group in terms of side-effect rates (12.2% vs. 39.6%, p = .001), and discontinuation rates due to side-effects were lower in the 10MEA group than in the 14EMBT group (0.7% vs. 13.2%, p < .001). Moreover, compliance was higher in the 10MEA group (94.2% (131/139)) than in the 14EBMT group (83.0% (44/53)) (p = .014). CONCLUSION: The 10-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy was found to have a high eradication rate with few side-effects and good drug compliance. These findings suggest that this regimen is a safe and effective second-line treatment option for H. pylori infection in Korea.     

Failure of Helicobacter pylori Treatment After Regimes Containing Clarithromycin: New Practical Therapeutic Options

Failure of Helicobacter pylori treatment is a growing problem in daily practice. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of two new regimes as second‐line options in a randomized and prospective study. Methods: Patients in whom a first eradication regime containing clarithromycin had failed were included. After performing gastroscopy and a 13C‐urea breath test (UBT), the patients were randomized to receive a combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of levofloxacin, and 200 mg (two tablets) of furazolidone administered once daily for 10 days (RLF) or the combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 120 mg (two tablets) of bismuth subcitrate, 100 mg of doxycycline, and 200 mg of furazolidone, administered twice daily for 10 days (RBDF). Clinical examinations and new UBT were performed 60 days after therapy. Results: Sixty patients were included (mean age, 46 years, 57% females). Two patients were excluded: one because of adverse effects and another as a result of protocol violation. Compliance was similar in both groups (90% took all medications correctly). Side‐effects (96% mild) were observed in 87% of the patients and were comparable between groups, except diarrhea, which was more frequent in group RLF (p= .025). Intention‐to‐treat cure rates were 77% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62–93%) in the RLF group and 83% (95% CI: 68–97%) in the RBDF group (p= .750). Per‐protocol cure rates were 80% (95% CI: 65–95%) in the RLF group and 82% (95% CI: 67–96%) in the RBDF group (p= 1.0). Conclusions: Both once‐daily triple (rabeprazole, levofloxacin, and furazolidone) and twice‐daily quadruple therapy (rabeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, doxycycline, and furazolidone) for 10 days achieved encouraging results. Subsequent studies should be performed to evaluate antibiotic resistance, doses, dosing intervals, duration of treatment, and safety of these two regimes.     

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Metronidazole and tetracycline-based second-line quadruple therapy, widely used for Helicobacter pylori infection, often ends up in failure due to antibiotic resistance and poor compliance in Korea. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as an alternative second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 85 patients infected with H. pylori, in whom initial proton pump inhibitor triple therapy had failed. They were randomized to receive the following 7-day therapy: 1, moxifloxacin 400 mg q.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d.; and 2, esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg q.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. Eradication rates, drug compliance, and side-effect rates of each group were evaluated. RESULTS: The eradication rates were 75.6 and 83.8% with moxifloxacin triple therapy, and 54.5 and 72.7% with quadruple therapy by intention-to-treat (p = .042) and per-protocol analyses (p = .260), respectively. Moxifloxacin triple therapy was significantly superior to quadruple therapy in terms of side-effect rates (p = .039). Compliance for therapy, i.e., the percentage of tablets taken (> 85%), was 90.2 and 75.0%, numerically higher in moxifloxacin triple therapy group than in quadruple therapy group, but without statistical difference (p = .065). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin-based triple therapy showed high eradication rates with few side effects and good drug compliance, suggesting this regimen could be a safe and effective option as second-line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea.     

Meta-Analysis: Lactobacillus Containing Quadruple Therapy Versus Standard Triple First-Line Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background:  Recent evidence showed that Lactobacilli could exert an inhibitory effect on Helicobacter pylori both in vitro and in vivo models. To systematically evaluate whether adding Lactobacilli to H. pylori eradication regimens could improve eradication rates and reduce side effects during anti- H. pylori treatment.
Materials and Methods:  Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases. We included all randomized trials comparing Lactobacilli supplementation to placebo or no treatment during anti- H. pylori regimens. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.10. Subanalysis analysis was also performed.
Results:  We identified eight randomized trials (n = 1372). Pooled H. pylori eradication rates were 82.26% (95% CI = 78.01–86.51%) and 76.97% (95% CI = 73.11–80.83%) for patients with or without Lactobacilli by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.78 (95% CI = 1.21–2.62). The occurrence of total side effects had no significant difference and were 30.84% (95% CI = 24.82–36.86%) and 42.24% (95% CI = 35.89%–48.59%) for two groups, the summary OR was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.24–1.02); However, Lactobacilli supplementation group had lower occurrence of diarrhoea, bloating and taste disturbance.
Conclusions:  Our review suggests that supplementation with Lactobacilli could be effective in increasing eradication rates of anti- H. pylori therapy for first-treated patients. Furthermore, Lactobacilli showed a positive impact on some H. pylori therapy-related side effects.     

Quadruple therapy with medications containing either rufloxacin or furazolidone as a rescue regimen in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-infected dyspepsia patients: a randomized pilot study

Background: The eradication rates of first‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients after an unsuccessful 10‐day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14‐day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n = 70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n = 68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for per‐protocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p < 0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. Conclusions: Fourteen‐day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.     

Increased primary resistance to recommended antibiotics negatively affects Helicobacter pylori eradication

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of two commonly employed treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection and the impact of bacterial resistance to antibiotics on eradication rate. Methods. Ninety‐two consecutive H. pylori‐positive patients with active peptic ulcer disease were randomly enrolled to receive a 7‐day treatment with either lansoprazole 30 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg [all twice a day (b.i.d.), Group A, n = 46]; or bismuth subcitrate 125 mg four times a day (q.i.d.) plus tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d and furazolidone 200 mg b.i.d. (Group B, n = 46) H. pylori status was reassessed 30 days after completion of the therapy and bacterial resistance to the antibiotics was investigated using an in vitro assay. Results. Five patients from each study group were lost to follow up. Both treatments resulted in similar H. pylori eradication rate: 66–60% (per protocol), 59–52% (intention‐to‐treat) in Groups A and B, respectively (non significant). However, eradication improved to 79% in the absence of H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin or amoxicillin. Conclusion. Primary resistance to clarithromycin or amoxicillin may underscore a potentially serious problem for the eradication of H. pylori infection. Testing for bacterial resistance may become necessary to improve therapeutic efficacy.     

Low efficacy of clarithromycin including sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) appears to achieve a better eradication rate than triple therapy. However, most of the data have been reported from the Italy, and studies from different population are needed before it is recommended in clinical practice. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two separate clarithromycin including sequential regimens in Turkey which is well known with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance to H. pylori. Methods: Consecutive H. pylori ‐positive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia were randomly allocated to one of the two sequential regimens; the first group was given lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for the first week, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for the second week (LA‐CM). The second arm was given the same regimen but tetracycline500 g q.i.d. instead of metronidazole (LA‐CT). H. pylori was detected with urea breath test (UBT) and histology before enrollment. UBT was repeated at 6th weeks after treatment. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in groups and 179 of them completed their protocols. The cumulative per protocol (“PP”) and intention‐to‐treat (“ITT”) eradication rates were 74.3% and 66.5% in all patients, respectively. Both “PP” (78.2% vs 70.1%) and “ITT” (72% vs 61%) eradication rates were better in LA‐CT group than LA‐CM group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects was comparable. Conclusion: Two weeks clarithromycin including sequential regimens with metronidazole or tetracycline were not achieved acceptable eradication rates in Turkey.