A 100-kD complex of two RNA-binding proteins from mitochondria of Leishmania tarentolae catalyzes RNA annealing and interacts with several RNA editing components

A stable 100-kD complex from mitochondria of Leishmania tarentolae containing two RNA-binding proteins, Ltp26 and Ltp28, was identified by cross-linking to unpaired 4-thiouridine nucleotides in a partially duplex RNA substrate. The genes were cloned and expressed and the complex was reconstituted from recombinant proteins in the absence of RNA or additional factors. The Ltp26 and Ltp28 proteins are homologs of gBP27 and gBP29 from Crithidia fasciculata and gBP25 and gBP21 from Trypanosoma brucei, respectively. The purified Ltp26/Ltp28 complex, the individual recombinant proteins, and the reconstituted complex are each capable of catalyzing the annealing of complementary RNAs, as was previously shown for gBP21 from T. brucei. A high-molecular-weight RNP complex consisting of the Ltp26/Ltp28 complex and several 55-60-kD proteins together with guide RNA could be purified from mitochondrial extract of L. tarentolae transfected with Ltp28-TAP. This complex also interacted in a less stable manner with the RNA ligase-containing L-complex and with the 3' TUTase. The Ltp26/Ltp28 RNP complex is a candidate for catalyzing the annealing of guide RNA and pre-edited mRNA in the initial step of RNA editing.     

Uridine insertion/deletion RNA editing in trypanosomatid mitochondria: In search of the editosome

The RNA ligase-containing or L-complex is the core complex involved in uridine insertion/deletion RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria. Blue native gels of glycerol gradient-separated fractions of mitochondrial lysate from cells transfected with the TAP-tagged editing protein, LC-8 (TbMP44/KREPB5), show a ∼1 MDa L-complex band and, in addition, two minor higher molecular weight REL1-containing complexes: one (L*a) co-sedimenting with the L-complex and running in the gel at around 1.2 MDa; the other (L*b) showing a continuous increase in molecular weight from 1 MDa to particles sedimenting over 70S. The L*b-complexes appear to be mainly composed of L-complex components, since polypeptide profiles of L- and L*b-complex gradient fractions were similar in composition and L*b-complex bands often degraded to L-complex bands after manipulation or freeze–thaw cycles. The L*a-complex may be artifactual since this gel shift can be produced by various experimental manipulations. However, the nature of the change and any cellular role remain to be determined. The L*b-complexes from both lysate and TAP pull-down were sensitive to RNase A digestion, suggesting that RNA is involved with the stability of the L*b-complexes. The MRP1/2 RNA binding complex is localized mainly in the L*b-complexes in substoichiometric amounts and this association is RNase sensitive. We suggest that the L*b-complexes may provide a scaffold for dynamic interaction with other editing factors during the editing process to form the active holoenzyme or “editosome.”     

Disruption of the zinc finger motifs in the Leishmania tarentolae LC-4 (=TbMP63) L-complex editing protein affects the stability of the L-complex

The uridine insertion/deletion editing complex, which we have termed the L-complex, is composed of at least 16 polypeptides stabilized entirely by protein-protein interactions. Three L-complex proteins contain zinc finger motifs that could be involved in these interactions. In Leishmania these proteins are labeled LC-1, LC-4, and LC-7b, and the orthologs in Trypanosoma brucei are labeled MP81, MP63, and MP42. Overexpression of TAP-tagged LC-4 in Leishmania tarentolae led to a partial localization of the protein in the L-complex together with the endogenous LC-4 protein, suggesting at least a dimeric organization. Disruption of zinc fingers 1 or 2 (ZnF-1 and ZnF-2) in the tagged LC-4 protein was performed by mutation of the two zinc-binding cysteines to glycines. Disruption of ZnF-1 led to a partial growth defect and a substantive breakdown of the L-complex, whereas disruption of ZnF-2 had no effect on cell growth and caused a partial breakdown of the L-complex. A close interaction of LC-4 with 2-4 proteins, including REL1 (RNA ligase) and LC-3, was suggested by chemical crosslinking and co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Our results suggest that both ZnF-1 and ZnF-2 in LC-4 play a role in protein-protein interactions and indicate that the LC-4 subcomplex may be required for formation or stability of the entire L-complex.     

Is the Trypanosoma brucei REL1 RNA ligase specific for U-deletion RNA editing,and is the REL2 RNA ligase specific for U-insertion editing?

It was shown previously that the REL1 mitochondrial RNA ligase in Trypanosoma brucei was a vital gene and disruption affected RNA editing in vivo, whereas the REL2 RNA ligase gene could be down-regulated with no effect on cell growth or on RNA editing. We performed down-regulation of REL1 in procyclic T. brucei (midgut insect forms) by RNA interference and found a 40-50% inhibition of Cyb editing, which has only U-insertions, as well as a similar inhibition of ND7 editing, which has both U-insertions and U-deletions. In addition, both U-insertion and U-deletion in vitro pre-cleaved editing were inhibited to similar extents. We also found little if any effect of REL1 down-regulation on the sedimentation coefficient or abundance of the RNA ligase-containing L-complex (Aphasizhev, R., Aphasizheva, I., Nelson, R. E., Gao, G., Simpson, A. M., Kang, X., Falick, A. M., Sbicego, S., and Simpson, L. (2003) EMBO J. 22, 913-924), suggesting that the inhibition of both insertion and deletion editing was not due to a disruption of the L-complex. Together with the evidence that down-regulation of REL2 has no effect on cell growth or on RNA editing in vivo or in vitro, these data suggest that the REL1 RNA ligase may be active in vivo in both U-insertion and U-deletion editing. The in vivo biological role of REL2 remains obscure.     

Cell-specific expression of genes of the lipid transfer protein family from Arabidopsis thaliana

We have characterized three cDNAs from a gene family encoding lipid transfer proteins, LTP, from Arabidopsis thaliana (Wassilewskija). In addition to the already characterized Ltp1, our analysis includes Ltp2 and Ltp3, two sequences previously known as expressed sequence tags (EST) only. The deduced amino acid sequences of the three cDNAs share 56 to 57% identity and show unique tissue- and cell-specific expression. Genes Ltp1 and LTp2 are located within approximately 1.4 kb of each other in tandem orientation. RNA hydridizations showed that all three LTP are expressed in flowering meristems, flowers and developing seeds. Ltp1 is expressed in leaves in addition. Ltp3, though not Ltp2, is also expressed in a short segment of the stem close to the flowering meristem. In contrast to the epidermis-specific Ltp1, both Ltp2 and Ltp3 are not restricted to the epidermis, but are also expressed in sub-epidermal layers of the organs in which they are found. In the upper stem segment, Ltp3 is predominantly cortical. It appears that the expression of these three cDNAs is sufficient to account for the formation of LTP in all meristematic and expanding cells of the aboveground plant. Evolutionary analysis allows the conclusion that each Ltp belongs to a different sub-family of genes. Additionally, parsimony analysis provides evidence that several copies of Ltp genes already existed in ancestors of the Brassicaceae family.     

Uridylate-specific 3' 5'-exoribonucleases involved in uridylate-deletion RNA editing in trypanosomatid mitochondria

In kinetoplastid protists, maturation of mitochondrial pre-mRNAs involves the insertion and deletion of uridylates (Us) within coding regions, as specified by mitochondrial DNA-encoded guide RNAs. U-deletion editing involves endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA at the editing site followed by U-specific 3'-5'-exonucleolytic removal of nonbase-paired Us prior to ligation of the two mRNA cleavage fragments. We showed previously that an exonuclease/endonuclease/phosphatase (EEP) motif protein from Leishmania major, designated RNA editing exonuclease 1 (REX1) (Kang, X., Rogers, K., Gao, G., Falick, A. M., Zhou, S.-L., and Simpson, L. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 1017-1022), exhibits 3'-5'-exonuclease activity. Two EEP motif proteins have also been identified in the Trypanosoma brucei editing complex. TbREX1 is a homologue of LmREX1, and TbREX2 shows homology to another editing protein in L. major, which lacks the EEP motif (LmREX2*). Here we have expressed the T. brucei EEP motif proteins in insect cells and purified them to homogeneity. We showed that these are U-specific 3'-5'-exonucleases that are inhibited by base pairing of 3' Us. The recombinant EEP motif alone also showed 3'-5' U-specific exonuclease activity, and mutations of the REX EEP motifs greatly reduced exonuclease activity. The absence of enzymatic activity in LmREX2* was confirmed with a purified recombinant protein. We showed that pre-cleaved U-deletion editing could be reconstituted with either TbREX1 or TbREX2 in combination with either RNA ligase, LmREL1, or LmREL2. Down-regulation of TbREX2 expression by conditional RNA interference had little effect on parasite viability or sedimentation of the L-complex, suggesting either that TbREX2 is inactive in vivo or that TbREX1 can compensate for the loss of TbREX2 function in down-regulated cells.     

Native Variants of the MRB1 Complex Exhibit Specialized Functions in Kinetoplastid RNA Editing

Adaptation and survival of Trypanosoma brucei requires editing of mitochondrial mRNA by uridylate (U) insertion and deletion. Hundreds of small guide RNAs (gRNAs) direct the mRNA editing at over 3,000 sites. RNA editing is controlled during the life cycle but the regulation of substrate and stage specificity remains unknown. Editing progresses in the 3’ to 5’ direction along the pre-mRNA in blocks, each targeted by a unique gRNA. A critical editing factor is the mitochondrial RNA binding complex 1 (MRB1) that binds gRNA and transiently interacts with the catalytic RNA editing core complex (RECC). MRB1 is a large and dynamic complex that appears to be comprised of distinct but related subcomplexes (termed here MRBs). MRBs seem to share a ‘core’ complex of proteins but differ in the composition of the ‘variable’ proteins. Since some proteins associate transiently the MRBs remain imprecisely defined. MRB1 controls editing by unknown mechanisms, and the functional relevance of the different MRBs is unclear. We previously identified two distinct MRBs, and showed that they carry mRNAs that undergo editing. We proposed that editing takes place in the MRBs because MRBs stably associate with mRNA and gRNA but only transiently interact with RECC, which is RNA free. Here, we identify the first specialized functions in MRBs: 1) 3010-MRB is a major scaffold for RNA editing, and 2) REH2-MRB contains a critical trans-acting RNA helicase (REH2) that affects multiple steps of editing function in 3010-MRB. These trans effects of the REH2 include loading of unedited mRNA and editing in the first block and in subsequent blocks as editing progresses. REH2 binds its own MRB via RNA, and conserved domains in REH2 were critical for REH2 to associate with the RNA and protein components of its MRB. Importantly, REH2 associates with a ~30 kDa RNA-binding protein in a novel ~15S subcomplex in RNA-depleted mitochondria. We use these new results to update our model of MRB function and organization.     

Composition of the editing complex of Trypanosoma brucei

The RNA editing that produces most functional mRNAs in trypanosomes is catalysed by a multiprotein complex. This complex catalyses the endoribonucleolytic cleavage, uridylate addition and removal, and RNA ligation steps of the editing process. Enzymatic and in vitro editing analyses reveal that each catalytic step contributes to the specificity of the editing and, together with the interaction between gRNA and the mRNA, results in precisely edited mRNAs. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis was used to identify the genes for several components of biochemically purified editing complexes. Their identity and presence in the editing complex were confirmed using immunochemical analyses utilizing mAbs specific to the editing complex components. The genes for two RNA ligases were identified. Genetic studies show that some, but not all, of the components of the complex are essential for editing. The TbMP52 RNA ligase is essential for editing while the TbMP48 RNA ligase is not. Editing was found to be essential in bloodstream form trypanosomes. This is surprising because mutants devoid of genes encoding RNAs that become edited survive as bloodstream forms but encouraging since editing complex components may be targets for chemotherapy.     

Purification of a functional enzymatic editing complex from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria.

Kinetoplastid mitochondrial RNA editing, the insertion and deletion of U residues, is catalyzed by sequential cleavage, U addition or removal, and ligation reactions and is directed by complementary guide RNAs. We have purified a approximately 20S enzymatic complex from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria that catalyzes a complete editing reaction in vitro. This complex possesses all four activities predicted to catalyze RNA editing: gRNA-directed endonuclease, terminal uridylyl transferase, 3' U-specific exonuclease, and RNA ligase. However, it does not contain other putative editing complex components: gRNA-independent endonuclease, RNA helicase, endogenous gRNAs or pre-mRNAs, or a 25 kDa gRNA-binding protein. The complex is composed of eight major polypeptides, three of which represent RNA ligase. These findings identify polypeptides representing catalytic editing factors, reveal the nature of this approximately 20S editing complex, and suggest a new model of editosome assembly.     

Novel role for RNA-binding protein CUGBP2 in mammalian RNA editing. CUGBP2 modulates C to U editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA by interacting with apobec-1 and ACF, the apobec-1 complementation factor

Mammalian apolipoprotein B (apoB) mRNA editing is mediated by a multicomponent holoenzyme containing apobec-1 and ACF. We have now identified CUGBP2, a 54-kDa RNA-binding protein, as a component of this holoenzyme. CUGBP2 and ACF co-fractionate in bovine liver S-100 extracts, and addition of recombinant apobec-1 leads to assembly of a holoenzyme. Immunodepletion of CUGBP2 co-precipitates ACF, and these proteins co-localize the nucleus of transfected cells, suggesting that CUGBP2 and ACF are bound in vivo. CUGBP2 binds apoB RNA, specifically an AU-rich sequence located immediately upstream of the edited cytidine. ApoB RNA from McA cells, bound to CUGBP2, was more extensively edited than the unbound fraction. However, addition of recombinant CUGBP2 to a reconstituted system demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibition of C to U RNA editing, which was rescued with either apobec-1 or ACF. Antisense CUGBP2 knockout increased endogenous apoB RNA editing, whereas antisense knockout of either apobec-1 or ACF expression eliminated apoB RNA editing, establishing the absolute requirement of these components of the core enzyme. These data suggest that CUGBP2 plays a role in apoB mRNA editing by forming a regulatory complex with the three components of the minimal editing enzyme, apobec-1, ACF, and apoB RNA.     

The effect of RNA interference Down-regulation of RNA editing 3'-terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) 1 on mitochondrial de novo protein synthesis and stability of respiratory complexes in Trypanosoma brucei

Inhibition of RNA editing by down-regulation of expression of the mitochondrial RNA editing TUTase 1 by RNA interference had profound effects on kinetoplast biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei procyclic cells. De novo synthesis of the apocytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit I proteins was no longer detectable after 3 days of RNAi. The effect on protein synthesis correlated with a decline in the levels of the assembled mitochondrial respiratory complexes III and IV, and also cyanide-sensitive oxygen uptake. The steady-state levels of nuclear-encoded subunits of complexes III and IV were also significantly decreased. Because the levels of the corresponding mRNAs were not affected, the observed effect was likely due to an increased turnover of these imported mitochondrial proteins. This induced protein degradation was selective for components of complexes III and IV, because little effect was observed on components of the F(1).F(0)-ATPase complex and on several other mitochondrial proteins.     

Developmental and pathogen-induced expression of three barley genes encoding lipid transfer proteins

Clones for three barley non-specific lipid transfer proteins (LTP2, LTP3, and LTP4; formerly Cw18, Cw20 and Cw21, respectively) which had been previously shown to inhibit growth of plant pathogens, were selected and characterized from a cDNA library derived from young etiolated leaves. Genes Ltp2 and Ltp4 were located in chromosome 3H and gene Ltp3 was assigned to chromosome 7H by Southern blot analysis of wheat—barley disomic addition lines, using gene-specific probes (3'-ends of cDNAs). These assignments were confirmed by the polymerase chain reaction, using specific primers. The three genes were expressed in stem, shoot apex, leaves and roots (at low levels) throughout development. Genes Ltp3 and Ltp4 were expressed at high levels, and Lpt2 at low levels, in the spike (rachis, lemma plus palea and grain coats). Neither of the mRNAs was detected in endosperm. The proteins were localized by tissue-printing with polyclonal antibodies in the outer cell layer of the exposed surfaces of the plant, throughout the embryo, and in vascular tissues. Expression levels in leaves were moderately increased by 0.34 M NaCl and by 0.1 mM abscisic acid and were not affected by cold, drought, salicylate, 2,6-dichloro-isonicotinic acid, ethylene or ethephon. Methyl Jasmonate (10 µM) switched off all three genes. Inoculation with Av6 or vir6 isolates of the fungal pathogen Erysiphe graminis increased the three mRNAs, especially that of LTP4, which reached a maximum nine-fold increase 12–16 h after infection.     

The DYW Subgroup PPR Protein MEF35 Targets RNA Editing Sites in the Mitochondrial rpl16, nad4 and cob mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana

RNA editing in plant mitochondria and plastids alters specific nucleotides from cytidine (C) to uridine (U) mostly in mRNAs. A number of PLS-class PPR proteins have been characterized as RNA recognition factors for specific RNA editing sites, all containing a C-terminal extension, the E domain, and some an additional DYW domain, named after the characteristic C-terminal amino acid triplet of this domain. Presently the recognition factors for more than 300 mitochondrial editing sites are still unidentified. In order to characterize these missing factors, the recently proposed computational prediction tool could be of use to assign target RNA editing sites to PPR proteins of yet unknown function. Using this target prediction approach we identified the nuclear gene MEF35 (Mitochondrial Editing Factor 35) to be required for RNA editing at three sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. The MEF35 protein contains eleven PPR repeats and E and DYW extensions at the C-terminus. Two T-DNA insertion mutants, one inserted just upstream and the other inside the reading frame encoding the DYW domain, show loss of editing at a site in each of the mRNAs for protein 16 in the large ribosomal subunit (site rpl16-209), for cytochrome b (cob-286) and for subunit 4 of complex I (nad4-1373), respectively. Editing is restored upon introduction of the wild type MEF35 gene in the reading frame mutant. The MEF35 protein interacts in Y2H assays with the mitochondrial MORF1 and MORF8 proteins, mutation of the latter also influences editing at two of the three MEF35 target sites. Homozygous mutant plants develop indistinguishably from wild type plants, although the RPL16 and COB/CYTB proteins are essential and the amino acids encoded after the editing events are conserved in most plant species. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the computational target prediction to screen for target RNA editing sites of E domain containing PLS-class PPR proteins.