ABNORMAL POLLEN TUBE GUIDANCE1, an Endoplasmic Reticulum-Localized Mannosyltransferase Homolog of GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL10 in Yeast and PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL GLYCAN ANCHOR BIOSYNTHESIS B in Human,Is Required for Arabidopsis Pollen Tube Micropylar Guidance and Embryo Development

The perception and response of pollen tubes to the female guidance signals are crucial for directional pollen tube growth inside female tissues, which leads to successful reproduction. In pursuing the mechanisms underlying this biological process, we identified the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) abnormal pollen tube guidance1 (aptg1) mutant, whose pollen tubes showed compromised micropylar guidance. In addition to its male defect, the aptg1 mutant showed embryo lethality. APTG1 encodes a putative mannosyltransferase homolog to human PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL GLYCAN ANCHOR BIOSYNTHESIS B and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL10 (GPI10), both of which are involved in the biosynthesis of GPI anchors. We found that APTG1 was expressed in most plant tissues, including mature pollen, pollen tubes, mature embryo sacs, and developing embryos. By fluorescence colabeling, we showed that APTG1 was localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where GPI anchors are synthesized. Disruption of APTG1 affected the localization of COBRA-LIKE10, a GPI-anchored protein important for pollen tube growth and guidance. The results shown here demonstrate that APTG1 is involved in both vegetative and reproductive development in Arabidopsis, likely through processing and proper targeting of GPI-anchored proteins.Double fertilization is the biological basis for seed propagation and plant reproduction in angiosperms. Pollen tubes grow through maternal tissue to deliver the immobile sperm cells into the female gametophyte (embryo sac). During this process, pollen tube guidance into the micropyle is a critical step and is precisely regulated (Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong, 2013). Female guidance signals are generated by both sporophytic and gametophytic tissues and operate at different stages during pollen tube growth. The sporophytic signal directs the growth of pollen tubes in the stigma, style, and transmitting tract. The signal that induces pollen tubes to turn to the funiculus and grow into the micropyle is termed gametophytic guidance (Shimizu and Okada, 2000; Higashiyama et al., 2003). Extensive cellular and genetic studies have demonstrated that female gametophytes play key roles in the micropylar guidance of pollen tubes (Kasahara et al., 2005; Márton et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Alandete-Saez et al., 2008; Okuda et al., 2009; Kessler and Grossniklaus, 2011; Takeuchi and Higashiyama, 2011). The molecular natures of such guidance signals have been gradually revealed in recent years (i.e. small peptides secreted by the female gametophyte, egg apparatus, or synergid cells; Márton et al., 2005; Jones-Rhoades et al., 2007; Okuda et al., 2009).Pollen tubes need to perceive the female guidance signals at the cell surface to initiate intracellular responses for directional growth. However, the mechanisms of pollen tube perception are still obscure. A few male factors involved in signal perception during pollen tube growth into ovules have been identified. For example, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) sperm cell-specific protein HAPLESS2/GENERATIVE CELL-SPECIFIC1 was necessary for pollen tubes to target the micropyle (von Besser et al., 2006). Arabidopsis CATION/PROTON EXCHANGER21 (CHX21) and CHX23 encode K⁺ transporters in growing pollen tubes. Pollen grains of the chx21 chx23 double mutant germinated and extended a normal tube in the transmitting tract, but their targeting of the funiculus failed (Lu et al., 2011). Arabidopsis POLLEN DEFECTIVE IN GUIDANCE1 (POD1) was expressed in pollen grains, pollen tubes, and synergid cells. The pod1 pollen tubes showed defective micropylar guidance (Li et al., 2011). The tip of the pollen tube has been hypothesized to be the site of cue perception for micropyle-directed growth. The Arabidopsis Rab GTPase RABA4D was localized at the tips of growing pollen tubes. Pollen tubes with defective RABA4D had severely reduced growth rates and ovule targeting (Szumlanski and Nielsen, 2009). Recently, two receptor-like kinases at the apical plasma membrane (PM) of growing pollen tubes, LOST IN POLLEN TUBE GUIDANCE1 (LIP1) and LIP2, were demonstrated to guide pollen tubes to the micropyle by perceiving the AtLURE1 signal from synergid cells (Liu et al., 2013).Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchoring provides a strategy for targeting proteins to the outer layer of the PMs in eukaryotic cells. GPI anchors are synthesized inside the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and are attached to proteins by posttranslational modifications in the ER. After processing, GPI-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) are transported to the cell surface following an unknown trafficking route and anchored at the cell surface (Maeda and Kinoshita, 2011). GPI-APs play very important roles in plant reproductive development (Gillmor et al., 2005; Ching et al., 2006; DeBono et al., 2009). An Arabidopsis putative GPI-AP, LORELEI, functioned in pollen tube reception of female signals, double fertilization, and early seed development (Capron et al., 2008; Tsukamoto et al., 2010). Arabidopsis COBRA-LIKE10 (COBL10), a GPI-AP, regulates the polar deposition of wall components in pollen tubes growing inside female tissues and is critical for micropylar guidance (Li et al., 2013). The conserved backbone of GPI anchors in eukaryotes is ethanolamine phosphate-6-Man-α-1,2-Man-α-1,6-Man-α-1,4-glucosamine-α-1,6-myoinositol phospholipid. During the biosynthesis of GPI anchors, monosaccharides, fatty acids, and phosphoethanolamines are sequentially added onto phosphatidylinositol. This process involves at least 16 enzymes and cofactors in mammals, including PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL GLYCAN ANCHOR BIOSYNTHESIS (PIG) A, B, C, F, G, H, L, M, N, O, P, Q, V, W, X, and Y (Maeda and Kinoshita, 2011). The core structure of the GPI anchor contains three Man residues donated by the substrate dolichol-phosphate-Man. GPI mannosyltransferases were required for adding the three Man residues of the GPI anchor in the ER lumen (Maeda and Kinoshita, 2011). Arabidopsis PEANUT1 (PNT1) is a homolog of the mammalian GPI mannosyltransferase PIG-M, involved in the addition of the first Man during the biosynthesis of the GPI anchor. The pnt1 mutant showed the defect of pollen viability and embryo development (Gillmor et al., 2005). PIG-B of human and GPI10 of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) encode GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL MANNOSYLTRANSFERASE3, involved in the addition of the third Man during the biosynthesis of the GPI anchor (Takahashi et al., 1996; Sütterlin et al., 1998). Mutation of PIG-B and GPI10 resulted in the accumulation of the GPI intermediate Man2-glucosamine-(acyl) phosphatidylinositol and led to cell death in yeast.In this study, we identified the ER-localized ABNORMAL POLLEN TUBE GUIDANCE1 (APTG1), an Arabidopsis homolog of PIG-B and GPI10. Pollen tubes of the aptg1 mutant showed compromised directional growth to the micropyle and lost the apical PM localization of COBL10. Besides the male defect, the mutant showed embryo lethality. In addition, reducing the expression of APTG1 resulted in defective seedling growth, indicating that APTG1 plays important roles in both reproductive and vegetative development.     

A Calcium Sensor-Regulated Protein Kinase,CALCINEURIN B-LIKE PROTEIN-INTERACTING PROTEIN KINASE19, Is Required for Pollen Tube Growth and Polarity

Calcium plays an essential role in pollen tube tip growth. However, little is known concerning the molecular basis of the signaling pathways involved. Here, we identified Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CALCINEURIN B-LIKE PROTEIN-INTERACTING PROTEIN KINASE19 (CIPK19) as an important element to pollen tube growth through a functional survey for CIPK family members. The CIPK19 gene was specifically expressed in pollen grains and pollen tubes, and its overexpression induced severe loss of polarity in pollen tube growth. In the CIPK19 loss-of-function mutant, tube growth and polarity were significantly impaired, as demonstrated by both in vitro and in vivo pollen tube growth assays. Genetic analysis indicated that disruption of CIPK19 resulted in a male-specific transmission defect. Furthermore, loss of polarity induced by CIPK19 overexpression was associated with elevated cytosolic Ca²⁺ throughout the bulging tip, whereas LaCl₃, a Ca²⁺ influx blocker, rescued CIPK19 overexpression-induced growth inhibition. Our results suggest that CIPK19 may be involved in maintaining Ca²⁺ homeostasis through its potential function in the modulation of Ca²⁺ influx.In flowering plants, fertilization is mediated by pollen tubes that extend directionally toward the ovule for sperm delivery (Krichevsky et al., 2007; Johnson, 2012). The formation of these elongated tubular structures is dependent on extreme polar growth (termed tip growth), in which cell expansion occurs exclusively in the very apical area (Yang, 2008; Rounds and Bezanilla, 2013). As this type of tip growth is amenable to genetic manipulation and cell biological analysis, the pollen tube is an excellent model system for the functional analysis of essential genes involved in polarity control and fertilization (Yang, 2008; Qin and Yang, 2011; Bloch and Yalovsky, 2013).It is well established that Ca²⁺ plays a critical role in pollen germination and tube growth (Konrad et al., 2011; Hepler et al., 2012). A steep tip-focused Ca²⁺ gradient has been detected at the tip of elongating pollen tubes (Rathore et al., 1991; Pierson et al., 1994; Hepler, 1997). In previous studies, artificial dissipation of the Ca²⁺ gradient seriously inhibited tip growth of pollen tubes, whereas elevation of internal Ca²⁺ level induced bending of the growth axis toward the zone of higher Ca²⁺. These studies suggest that Ca²⁺ not only controls pollen tube elongation but also modulates growth orientation (Miller et al., 1992; Malho et al., 1994; Malho and Trewavas, 1996; Hepler, 1997). These Ca²⁺ signatures are perceived and relayed to downstream responses by a complex toolkit of Ca²⁺-binding proteins that function as Ca²⁺ sensors (Yang and Poovaiah, 2003; Harper et al., 2004; Dodd et al., 2010).To date, four major Ca²⁺ sensor families have been identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), including calcium-dependent protein kinase, calmodulin (CaM), calmodulin-like (CML), and CALCINEURIN B-LIKE (CBL) proteins (Luan et al., 2002, 2009; Yang and Poovaiah, 2003; Harper et al., 2004). Calcium-dependent protein kinase family members comprise a kinase domain and a CaM-like domain in a single protein; thus, they act not only as a Ca²⁺ sensor but also as an effector, designated as sensor responders (Cheng et al., 2002). In contrast, CaM, CML, and CBL proteins do not have any enzymatic domains but transmit Ca²⁺ signals to downstream targets via Ca²⁺-dependent protein-protein interactions. Therefore, they have been designated as sensor relays (McCormack et al., 2005). While CaM and CML proteins interact with a diverse array of target proteins, it is generally accepted that CBLs interact specifically with a group of Ser/Thr protein kinases termed CALCINEURIN B-LIKE PROTEIN-INTERACTING PROTEIN KINASEs (CIPKs; Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004).In Arabidopsis, several CBLs coupled with their target CIPKs have been demonstrated to function in the regulation of ion homeostasis and stress responses (Luan et al., 2009). Under salt stress, SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE3 (SOS3)/CBL4-SOS2/CIPK24 regulate SOS1 at the plasma membrane for Na⁺ exclusion, whereas CBL10-CIPK24 complexes appear to regulate Na⁺ sequestration at the tonoplast (Liu et al., 2000; Qiu et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2007; Quan et al., 2007). For low-K⁺ stress, CBL1 and CBL9, with 87% amino acid sequence identity, interact with CIPK23, which regulates a voltage-gated ion channel (ARABIDOPSIS K⁺ TRANSPORTER1) to mediate the uptake of K⁺ in root hairs (Li et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2006; Cheong et al., 2007). In addition, CBL1 integrates plant responses to cold, drought, salinity, and hyperosmotic stresses (Albrecht et al., 2003; Cheong et al., 2003), and CBL9 is involved in abscisic acid signaling and biosynthesis during seed germination (Pandey et al., 2004). Over the past decade, the functions of CBL-CIPK complexes in abiotic stress tolerance have been studied extensively, but only limited studies focus on CBL family members in pollen tube growth. For example, CBL3 overexpression caused a defective phenotype in pollen tube growth (Zhou et al., 2009). Overexpression of CBL1 or its closest homolog CBL9 inhibited pollen germination and perturbed tube growth at high external K⁺, whereas disruption of CBL1 and CBL9 leads to a significantly reduced growth rate of pollen tubes under low-K⁺ conditions (Mähs et al., 2013). The potential roles of CIPKs in pollen tubes so far appear to be completely unknown.In this study, we demonstrated that Arabidopsis CIPK19, a CIPK specifically expressed in pollen grains and pollen tubes, functions in pollen tube tip growth, providing a new insight into the function of the CBL-CIPK network in the control of growth polarity during pollen tube extension in fertilization.     

The Apical Actin Fringe Contributes to Localized Cell Wall Deposition and Polarized Growth in the Lily Pollen Tube

In lily (Lilium formosanum) pollen tubes, pectin, a major component of the cell wall, is delivered through regulated exocytosis. The targeted transport and secretion of the pectin-containing vesicles may be controlled by the cortical actin fringe at the pollen tube apex. Here, we address the role of the actin fringe using three different inhibitors of growth: brefeldin A, latrunculin B, and potassium cyanide. Brefeldin A blocks membrane trafficking and inhibits exocytosis in pollen tubes; it also leads to the degradation of the actin fringe and the formation of an aggregate of filamentous actin at the base of the clear zone. Latrunculin B, which depolymerizes filamentous actin, markedly slows growth but allows focused pectin deposition to continue. Of note, the locus of deposition shifts frequently and correlates with changes in the direction of growth. Finally, potassium cyanide, an electron transport chain inhibitor, briefly stops growth while causing the actin fringe to completely disappear. Pectin deposition continues but lacks focus, instead being delivered in a wide arc across the pollen tube tip. These data support a model in which the actin fringe contributes to the focused secretion of pectin to the apical cell wall and, thus, to the polarized growth of the pollen tube.Pollen tubes provide an excellent model for studying the molecular and physiological processes that lead to polarized cell growth. Because all plant cell growth results from the regulated yielding of the cell wall in response to uniform turgor pressure (Winship et al., 2010; Rojas et al., 2011), the cell wall of the pollen tube must yield only at a particular spot: the cell apex, or tip. To accomplish the extraordinary growth rates seen in many species, and to balance the thinning of the apical wall due to rapid expansion, the pollen tube delivers prodigious amounts of wall material, largely methoxylated pectins, to the tip in a coordinated manner. Recent studies suggest that the targeted exocytosis increases the extensibility of the cell wall matrix at the tip, which then yields to the existing turgor pressure, permitting the tip to extend or grow (McKenna et al., 2009; Hepler et al., 2013). There are many factors that influence exocytosis in growing pollen tubes; in this study, we investigate the role of the apical actin fringe.For many years, it has been known that an actin structure exists near the pollen tube tip, yet its exact form has been a matter of some contention (Kost et al., 1998; Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2005; Wilsen et al., 2006; Cheung et al., 2008; Vidali et al., 2009; Qu et al., 2013). The apical actin structure has been variously described as a fringe, a basket, a collar, or a mesh. Using rapid freeze fixation of lily (Lilium formosanum) pollen tubes followed by staining with anti-actin antibodies, the structure appears as a dense fringe of longitudinally oriented microfilaments, beginning 1 to 5 µm behind the apex and extending 5 to 10 µm basally. The actin filaments are positioned in the cortical cytoplasm close to the plasma membrane (Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2005). More recently, we used Lifeact-mEGFP, a probe that consistently labels this palisade of longitudinally oriented microfilaments in living cells (Vidali et al., 2009; Fig. 1A, left column). For the purposes of this study, we will refer to this apical organization of actin as a fringe.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The actin fringe and the thickened pollen tube tip wall are stable, although dynamic, structures during pollen tube growth. A, The left column shows a pollen tube transformed with Lifeact-mEGFP imaged with a spinning-disc confocal microscope. Maximal projections from every 15 s are shown. The right column shows epifluorescence images of a pollen tube stained with PI. Again, images captured every 15 s are shown. Bars = 10 μm. B, The data from the pollen tube in A expressing Lifeact-mEGFP were subjected to kymograph analysis using an 11-pixel strip along the image’s midline. C, The first three frames from the pollen tube in A and B were assigned the colors red, blue, and green, respectively, and then overlaid. Areas with white show the overlap of all three. The fringe is stable, but most of its constituent actin is not shared between frames.Many lines of evidence demonstrate that actin is required for pollen tube growth. Latrunculin B (LatB), which blocks actin polymerization, inhibits pollen tube growth and disrupts the cortical fringe at concentrations as low as 2 nm. Higher concentrations are needed to block pollen grain germination and cytoplasmic streaming (Gibbon et al., 1999; Vidali et al., 2001). Actin-binding proteins, including actin depolymerizing factor-cofilin, formin, profilin, and villin, and signaling proteins, such as Rho-of-Plants (ROP) GTPases and their effectors (ROP interacting crib-containing proteins [RICs]), also have been shown to play critical roles in growth and actin dynamics (Fu et al., 2001; Vidali et al., 2001; Allwood et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2002; Cheung and Wu, 2004; McKenna et al., 2004; Gu et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2009; Cheung et al., 2010; Staiger et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010a; Qu et al., 2013; van Gisbergen and Bezanilla, 2013).Our understanding of the process of exocytosis and pollen tube elongation has been influenced by ultrastructural images of pollen tube tips, which reveal an apical zone dense with vesicles (Cresti et al., 1987; Heslop-Harrison, 1987; Lancelle et al., 1987; Steer and Steer, 1989; Lancelle and Hepler, 1992; Derksen et al., 1995). It has long been assumed that these represent exocytotic vesicles destined to deliver new cell wall material. This model of polarized secretion has been challenged in recent years in studies using FM dyes. Two groups have suggested that exocytosis occurs in a circumpolar annular zone (Bove et al., 2008; Zonia and Munnik, 2008). However, other studies, using fluorescent beads attached to the cell surface, indicate that the maximal rate of expansion, and of necessity the greatest deposition of cell wall material, occurs at the apex along the polar axis of the tube (Dumais et al., 2006; Rojas et al., 2011). Similarly, our experiments with propidium iodide (PI; McKenna et al., 2009; Rounds et al., 2011a) and pectin methyl esterase fused to GFP (McKenna et al., 2009) show that the wall is thickest at the very tip and suggest that wall materials are deposited at the polar axis, consistent with the initial model of exocytosis (Lancelle and Hepler, 1992). Experiments using tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen and a receptor-like kinase fused to GFP also indicate that exocytosis occurs largely at the apical polar axis (Lee et al., 2008).Many researchers argue that apical actin is critical for exocytosis (Lee et al., 2008; Cheung et al., 2010; Qin and Yang, 2011; Yan and Yang, 2012). More specifically, recent work suggests that the fringe participates in targeting vesicles and thereby contributes to changes in growth direction (Kroeger et al., 2009; Bou Daher and Geitmann, 2011; Dong et al., 2012). In this article, using three different inhibitors, namely brefeldin A (BFA), LatB, and potassium cyanide (KCN), we test the hypothesis that polarized pectin deposition in pollen tubes requires the actin fringe. Our data show that during normal growth, pectin deposition is focused to the apex along the polar axis of the tube. However, when growth is modulated, different end points arise, depending on the inhibitor. With BFA, exocytosis stops completely, and the fringe disappears, with the appearance of an actin aggregate at the base of the clear zone. LatB, as shown previously (Vidali et al., 2009), incompletely degrades the actin fringe and leaves a rim of F-actin around the apical dome. Here, we show that, in the presence of LatB, pectin deposition continues, with the focus of this activity shifting in position frequently as the slowly elongating pollen tube changes direction. With KCN, the actin fringe degrades completely, but exocytosis continues and becomes depolarized, with pectin deposits now occurring across a wide arc of the apical dome. This dome often swells as deposition continues, only stopping once normal growth resumes. Taken together, these results support a role for the actin fringe in controlling the polarity of growth in the lily pollen tube.     

Exocyst SEC3 and Phosphoinositides Define Sites of Exocytosis in Pollen Tube Initiation and Growth

Polarized exocytosis is critical for pollen tube growth, but its localization and function are still under debate. The exocyst vesicle-tethering complex functions in polarized exocytosis. Here, we show that a sec3a exocyst subunit null mutant cannot be transmitted through the male gametophyte due to a defect in pollen tube growth. The green fluorescent protein (GFP)-SEC3a fusion protein is functional and accumulates at or proximal to the pollen tube tip plasma membrane. Partial complementation of sec3a resulted in the development of pollen with multiple tips, indicating that SEC3 is required to determine the site of pollen germination pore formation. Time-lapse imaging demonstrated that SEC3a and SEC8 were highly dynamic and that SEC3a localization on the apical plasma membrane predicts the direction of growth. At the tip, polar SEC3a domains coincided with cell wall deposition. Labeling of GFP-SEC3a-expressing pollen with the endocytic marker FM4-64 revealed the presence of subdomains on the apical membrane characterized by extensive exocytosis. In steady-state growing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes, SEC3a displayed amino-terminal Pleckstrin homology-like domain (SEC3a-N)-dependent subapical membrane localization. In agreement, SEC3a-N interacted with phosphoinositides in vitro and colocalized with a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) marker in pollen tubes. Correspondingly, molecular dynamics simulations indicated that SEC3a-N associates with the membrane by interacting with PIP₂. However, the interaction with PIP₂ is not required for polar localization and the function of SEC3a in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Taken together, our findings indicate that SEC3a is a critical determinant of polar exocytosis during tip growth and suggest differential regulation of the exocytotic machinery depending on pollen tube growth modes.Pollen tube growth provides a unique model system for studying the role of exocytosis in cell morphogenesis. Pollen tubes are characterized by a highly rapid polarized unidirectional tip growth. Given the relative simplicity of their structure, fast growth rates, haploid genome content, and ability to grow under in vitro culture conditions, pollen tubes provide an extremely attractive system for studying cell morphogenesis. Furthermore, the growth characteristics of pollen tubes resemble those of root hairs, moss protonema, and fungal hyphae and to some extent can be paralleled to neurite growth (Chebli and Geitmann, 2007; Cheung and Wu, 2008; Guan et al., 2013; Hepler and Winship, 2015).It is well established that oscillating polarized exocytosis is fundamental for pollen tube development and determines growth rate (Bove et al., 2008; McKenna et al., 2009; Chebli et al., 2013). Exocytosis is required for the delivery of membrane and cell wall components to the growing tip. Yet, the exact location where exocytosis takes place is under debate. Ultrastructural studies showing the accumulation of vesicles at the tip suggested that exocytosis takes place at the tip (Lancelle et al., 1987; Lancelle and Hepler, 1992; Derksen et al., 1995), which was further supported by studies on the dynamics of cell wall thickness (Rojas et al., 2011), secretion of pectin methyl esterase (PME) and PME inhibitor, and staining of pectin by propidium iodide (PI; Röckel et al., 2008; Rounds et al., 2014). Conversely, based on colabeling with FM1-43 and FM4-64, it was concluded that exocytosis takes place in a subapical collar located in the transition zone between the tip and the shank, as well as at the shank, but not at the tip (Bove et al., 2008; Zonia and Munnik, 2008). In agreement, the pollen tube-specific syntaxin GFP-SYP124 was observed in the inverted cone, 10 to 25 μm away from the tip (Silva et al., 2010), and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments with FM dyes also have indicated that exocytosis takes place at the subapical region (Bove et al., 2008; Moscatelli et al., 2012; Idilli et al., 2013). Yet, based on pollen tube reorientation experiments in a microfluidics device, it was concluded that growth takes place at the tip rather than at a subapical collar located in the transition zone between the apex and the shank (Sanati Nezhad et al., 2014). The tip-based growth is in agreement with exocytosis taking place at the tip. Presumably, part of the disagreement regarding the site of exocytosis resulted from the lack of intracellular markers for exocytosis (Cheung and Wu, 2008; Hepler and Winship, 2015), and as a result, the relationship between the FM dye-labeled inverted cone and exocytotic events during pollen tube growth is not fully understood.In many cell types, the process of secretory vesicles tethering and docking prior to fusion with the plasma membrane is initially mediated by an evolutionarily conserved tethering complex known as the exocyst. The exocyst is a heterooligomeric protein complex composed of eight subunits, SEC3, SEC5, SEC6, SEC8, SEC10, SEC15, EXO70, and EXO84 (TerBush et al., 1996; Guo et al., 1999). Studies originally based on budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) have shown that the exocyst functions as an effector of Rab and Rho small GTPases that specifies the sites of vesicle docking and fusion at the plasma membrane in both space and time (Guo et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2001). Support for the function of the exocyst in vesicle tethering was demonstrated recently by ectopic Sec3p-dependent vesicle recruitment to the mitochondria (Luo et al., 2014).Land plants contain all subunits of the exocyst complex, which were shown to form the functional complex (Elias et al., 2003; Cole et al., 2005; Synek et al., 2006; Hála et al., 2008). Studies in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and maize (Zea mays) have implicated the exocyst in the regulation of pollen tube and root hair growth, seed coat deposition, response to pathogens, cytokinesis, and meristem and stigma function (Cole et al., 2005; Synek et al., 2006; Hála et al., 2008; Fendrych et al., 2010; Kulich et al., 2010; Pecenková et al., 2011; Safavian and Goring, 2013; Wu et al., 2013; Safavian et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016). The growth arrest of pollen tubes in sec8, sec6, sec15a, and sec5a/sec5b single and double mutants (Cole et al., 2005; Hála et al., 2008) or following treatment with the EXO70 inhibitor ENDOSIDIN2 (Zhang et al., 2016), and of root hairs in maize root hairless1 (rth1) SEC3 mutant (Wen et al., 2005), the inhibition of seed coat deposition in the sec8 and exo70A1 mutants (Kulich et al., 2010), and stigmatic papillae function in exo70A1 mutant plants (Safavian and Goring, 2013; Safavian et al., 2015) have implicated the exocyst in polarized exocytosis in plants. Given their function, it was likely that exocyst subunits could be used as markers for polarized exocytosis. Furthermore, it could also be hypothesized that, by studying the mechanisms that underlie the association of the exocyst complex with the plasma membrane, it should be possible to identify mechanisms underlying the regulation of polarized exocytosis (Guan et al., 2013). Moreover, since the interaction of exocytotic vesicles with the exocyst is transient and marks the site(s) of active exocytosis in the membrane, fluorescently labeled exocyst subunits could be used as markers for exocytosis while avoiding potential imaging artifacts stemming from pollen tube tips densely populated with vesicles.We have shown previously that the ROP effector ICR1 can interact with SEC3a and that ROPs can recruit SEC3a-ICR1 complexes to the plasma membrane (Lavy et al., 2007). However, ICR1 is not expressed in pollen tubes, suggesting that SEC3a membrane binding in these cells is likely dependent on other factors. In yeast, the interaction of Sec3p and Exo70p subunits with the plasma membrane is critical for exocyst function (He and Guo, 2009). It has been shown that the membrane binding of both Sec3p and Exo70p is facilitated by their interaction with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂; He et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2008). The yeast Exo70p interacts with PIP₂ via a number of positively charged residues distributed along the protein, with the highest number located at the C-terminal end (Pleskot et al., 2015). It has been suggested that yeast Sec3p interacts with PIP₂ through N-terminal basic residues (Zhang et al., 2008). These data were further corroborated by x-ray crystallography studies, which showed that the yeast Sec3p N-terminal region forms a Pleckstrin homology (PH) domain fold (Baek et al., 2010; Yamashita et al., 2010), a PIP₂ interaction motif (Lemmon, 2008).The localization of the exocyst subunits has been addressed in several studies. In Arabidopsis root hairs and root epidermis cells, SEC3a-GFP was observed in puncta distributed throughout the cell (Zhang et al., 2013). Studies on the Arabidopsis EXO70 subunits EXO70E2, EXO70A1, and EXO70B1 revealed them to be localized in distinct compartments that were termed exocyst-positive organelles (Wang et al., 2010). The exocyst-positive organelles, visualized mostly by ectopic expression, were shown to be cytoplasmic double membrane organelles that can fuse with the plasma membrane and secrete their contents to the apoplast in an exosome-like manner. It is not yet known whether other exocyst subunits also are localized to the same organelles and what might be the biological function of this putative compartment (Wang et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2015). In differentiating xylem cells, two coiled-coil proteins termed VESICLE TETHERING1 and VESICLE TETHERING2 recruit EXO70A1-positive puncta to microtubules via the GOLGI COMPLEX2 protein (Oda et al., 2015). Importantly, the functionality of the XFP fusion proteins used for the localization studies described above was not tested, and in most cases, the fusion proteins were overexpressed. Therefore, the functional localization of the exocyst is still unclear.Here, we studied the function and subcellular localization of the Arabidopsis exocyst SEC3a subunit using a combination of genetics, cell biology, biochemistry, and structural modeling approaches. Our results show that SEC3a is essential for the determination of pollen tube tip germination site and growth. Partial complementation of sec3a resulted in the formation of pollen with multiple pollen tube tips. In Arabidopsis growing pollen tubes, SEC3a localization is dynamic, and it accumulates in domains of polarized secretion, at or close to the tip plasma membrane (PM). Labeling of GFP-SEC3-expressing pollen with FM4-64 revealed the spatial correlation between polarized exocytosis and endocytic recycling. Furthermore, the association of SEC3a with PM at the tip marks the direction of tube elongation and positively correlates with the deposition of PI-labeled pectins and specific anti-esterified pectin antibodies in the cell wall. In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), the mechanisms underlying SEC3a interaction with the PM and its subcellular distribution depend on pollen tube growth mode and involve the interaction with PIP2 through the N-terminal PH domain. Collectively, our results highlight the function of SEC3a as a polarity determinant that links between polarized exocytosis and cell morphogenesis. The correlation between exocyst function and distribution in pollen tubes provides an explanation for some of the current discrepancies regarding the localization of exocytosis.     

Dynamics and Organization of Cortical Microtubules as Revealed by Superresolution Structured Illumination Microscopy

Plants employ acentrosomal mechanisms to organize cortical microtubule arrays essential for cell growth and differentiation. Using structured illumination microscopy (SIM) adopted for the optimal documentation of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) hypocotyl epidermal cells, dynamic cortical microtubules labeled with green fluorescent protein fused to the microtubule-binding domain of the mammalian microtubule-associated protein MAP4 and with green fluorescent protein-fused to the alpha tubulin6 were comparatively recorded in wild-type Arabidopsis plants and in the mitogen-activated protein kinase mutant mpk4 possessing the former microtubule marker. The mpk4 mutant exhibits extensive microtubule bundling, due to increased abundance and reduced phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein MAP65-1, thus providing a very useful genetic tool to record intrabundle microtubule dynamics at the subdiffraction level. SIM imaging revealed nano-sized defects in microtubule bundling, spatially resolved microtubule branching and release, and finally allowed the quantification of individual microtubules within cortical bundles. Time-lapse SIM imaging allowed the visualization of subdiffraction, short-lived excursions of the microtubule plus end, and dynamic instability behavior of both ends during free, intrabundle, or microtubule-templated microtubule growth and shrinkage. Finally, short, rigid, and nondynamic microtubule bundles in the mpk4 mutant were observed to glide along the parent microtubule in a tip-wise manner. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential of SIM for superresolution time-lapse imaging of plant cells, showing unprecedented details accompanying microtubule dynamic organization.Plant cell growth and differentiation depend on dynamic cortical microtubule organization mechanisms (Ehrhardt, 2008). Such mechanisms include branched microtubule formation and release (Murata et al., 2005; Nakamura et al., 2010; Fishel and Dixit, 2013), microtubule-templated microtubule growth (Chan et al., 2009), angle-of-contact microtubule bundling or catastrophe induction (Dixit and Cyr, 2004; Tulin et al., 2012), severing at microtubule crossovers (Wightman and Turner, 2007), and unique dynamic behavior between steady-state treadmilling and dynamic instability (Shaw et al., 2003).Cortical microtubule dynamics have been studied in vivo and in vitro with total internal reflection microscopy (TIRFM; Vizcay-Barrena et al., 2011), variable-angle emission microscopy (VAEM; Wan et al., 2011), spinning-disc microscopy (SD; Shaw and Lucas, 2011), and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Shaw et al., 2003). TIRFM and VAEM provide sufficient resolution and speed but at limited depth of imaging (approximately 200 nm; Martin-Fernandez et al., 2013) and inevitably a very narrow field of view when used for in vivo studies (Mattheyses et al., 2010). Dynamic CLSM imaging suffers from field-of-view limitations while also introducing phototoxicity to the imaged sample. Furthermore, CLSM is based on a speed-to-resolution tradeoff that will necessitate computational extrapolation to bring resolution to affordable levels (Rosero et al., 2014). Finally, SD can provide sufficient depth and speed but otherwise poor resolution, owing to aberrations arising from the sample and the properties of the optics commonly used (Shaw and Ehrhardt, 2013).Microtubule research evolved concomitant with optical microscopy and the development of fluorescent proteins markers, allowing the resolution of microtubule dynamics and organization at video rates (Marc et al., 1998; Shaw and Ehrhardt, 2013). However, the bulk of plant cells organized in tissues and the optical properties of cell walls hamper microscopic observations, so that the delineation of fine details of microtubule organization still relies on laborious transmission electron microscopy (Kang, 2010).Alternatively, in vitro assays using total internal reflection (TIRFM) or Allen’s video-enhanced contrast-differential interference contrast microscopy (Allen et al., 1981) with purified components have advanced the understanding of microtubule-microtubule-associated protein (MAP) interactions while providing mechanistic insight on the function of MAP65 proteins (Tulin et al., 2012; Portran et al., 2013; Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2013), kinesin motors (Song et al., 1997), katanin-mediated microtubule severing (Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2007), and microtubule dynamics (Moore et al., 1997). However, it is explicitly acknowledged that such in vitro assays should be addressed in biologically coherent systems with physiological relevance to microtubule dynamics (Gardner et al., 2013; Zanic et al., 2013). Thus, an ideal approach would be to address microtubule dynamics in the complex cellular environment at spatiotemporal resolutions achieved by in vitro assays.Subdiffraction optical microscopy techniques allow subcellular observations below Abbe’s resolution threshold (Verdaasdonk et al., 2014), complementing the use of transmission electron microscopy. Such approaches permit dynamic subcellular tracking of appropriately tagged structures within living cells (Tiwari and Nagai, 2013). Practically, two superresolution strategies exist. The first involves patterned light illumination, allowing superresolution acquisitions by two fundamentally different methods, stimulated emission depletion (STED; Hell, 2007) and structured illumination microscopy (SIM; Gustafsson, 2000). The second interrogates the precision of fluorophore localization and includes stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM; Kamiyama and Huang, 2012) and photoactivation localization microscopy (PALM; Sengupta et al., 2012). The above regimes differ in translational and axial resolution, and their temporal efficiency depends on the size of the imaged area. SIM is probably the best compromise for superresolution live imaging, as it offers reasonable lateral resolution (approximately 100 nm; Gustafsson, 2000), which may be reduced to 50 nm (Rego et al., 2012), and sufficient depth of imaging combined with a reasonable axial resolution (approximately 200 nm). SIM allows dynamic imaging in a broader field of view than STED, at biologically meaningful rates compared with PALM and STORM (Kner et al., 2009), and with deeper imaging capacity compared with other superresolution regimes and with TIRFM/VAEM (Leung and Chou, 2011). Superresolution approaches have received limited attention in the plant cell biology field (Fitzgibbon et al., 2010; Kleine-Vehn et al., 2011), and their resolution potential during live imaging was not quantified previously.Here, high-numerical aperture (NA) objectives were combined with SIM for the acquisition and systematic quantification of subdiffraction details of cortical microtubules labeled either with GFP fused to the microtubule-binding domain of mammalian MAP4 (GFP-MBD; Marc et al., 1998) or with GFP fused to alpha tubulin6 (GFP-TUA6; Shaw et al., 2003). For such studies, wild-type plants and a mitogen-activated protein kinase4 (mpk4) mutant, exhibiting extensive microtubule bundling due to the overexpression and underphosphorylation of MAP65-1 (Beck et al., 2010), were used.     

NaStEP: A Proteinase Inhibitor Essential to Self-Incompatibility and a Positive Regulator of HT-B Stability in Nicotiana alata Pollen Tubes

In Solanaceae, the self-incompatibility S-RNase and S-locus F-box interactions define self-pollen recognition and rejection in an S-specific manner. This interaction triggers a cascade of events involving other gene products unlinked to the S-locus that are crucial to the self-incompatibility response. To date, two essential pistil-modifier genes, 120K and High Top-Band (HT-B), have been identified in Nicotiana species. However, biochemistry and genetics indicate that additional modifier genes are required. We recently reported a Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor, named NaStEP (for Nicotiana alata Stigma-Expressed Protein), that is highly expressed in the stigmas of self-incompatible Nicotiana species. Here, we report the proteinase inhibitor activity of NaStEP. NaStEP is taken up by both compatible and incompatible pollen tubes, but its suppression in Nicotiana spp. transgenic plants disrupts S-specific pollen rejection; therefore, NaStEP is a novel pistil-modifier gene. Furthermore, HT-B levels within the pollen tubes are reduced when NaStEP-suppressed pistils are pollinated with either compatible or incompatible pollen. In wild-type self-incompatible N. alata, in contrast, HT-B degradation occurs preferentially in compatible pollinations. Taken together, these data show that the presence of NaStEP is required for the stability of HT-B inside pollen tubes during the rejection response, but the underlying mechanism is currently unknown.To avoid low-fitness progeny, many plants have developed a cell-cell interaction mechanism to promote outcrossing, through the recognition and discrimination of both self and nonself pollen. This recognition system is controlled by the highly polymorphic self-incompatibility S-locus, which determines pollination specificity in both the pollen and pistil. Pollen is rejected when male and female S-haplotypes coincide (de Nettancourt, 1977, 2001; Franklin et al., 1995).In Solanaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Rosaceae, the S-locus product in the pistil is an extracellular glycoprotein named S-RNase (Anderson et al., 1986; McClure et al., 1989). During pollination, S-RNase is taken up by both compatible and incompatible pollen tubes (Luu et al., 2000) and targeted to a vacuole (Goldraij et al., 2006). In the later stages of an incompatible cross, the S-RNase-containing vacuole is disrupted and the S-RNases are released to the pollen tube cytoplasm, where RNA degradation can occur (McClure et al., 2011).The S-pollen gene encodes an SLF or SFB (SLF/SFB; for S-locus F-box) protein, which is a member of the F-box protein family (Entani et al., 2003; Sijacic et al., 2004). In vitro binding assays show that PiSLF in Petunia inflata physically interacts with S-RNases, although this interaction is stronger with nonself S-RNases than with self S-RNases (Hua and Kao, 2006). Additional protein-protein interaction assays suggest that SLF/SFB may be a component of an SCF (for Skp1-Cullin1-F-box) or SCF-like complex (Qiao et al., 2004; Hua and Kao, 2006). Notably, data from Zhao et al. (2010) in Petunia hybrida show that reduction of PhSSK1 (for P. hybrida SLF-interacting Skp-like1) and its Antirrhinum hispanicum ortholog, AhSSK1, is also required for cross-pollen compatibility.Although S-RNase and SLF/SFB define pollen rejection S-specificity, modifier genes unlinked to the S-locus are required for self-incompatibility (SI; Martin, 1968; Ai et al., 1991; Murfett et al., 1996; Tsukamoto et al., 1999).To date, only two pistil-modifier genes have been identified: High Top-Band (HT-B) and 120K. In Nicotiana spp., HT-B is an 8.6-kD acidic protein with a domain consisting of 20 Asn and Asp residues toward its C terminus (McClure et al., 1999; Kondo and McClure, 2008). Loss-of-function assays prove HT-B to be essential for pollen rejection in Nicotiana spp., Solanum spp., and Petunia spp. (McClure et al., 1999; Kondo et al., 2002; O’Brien et al., 2002; Sassa and Hirano, 2006; Puerta et al., 2009), although it is not expressed in SI Solanum habrochaites, prompting the speculation that in this species a related gene, HT-A, may function as a substitute (Covey et al., 2010). Immunolocalization shows that HT-B is readily taken up by pollen tubes during pollination. Its steady-state levels decrease slightly in pollen tubes from incompatible pollinations. However, in compatible crosses, HT-B levels decrease 75% to 97%, probably as a result of protein degradation (Goldraij et al., 2006).120K is a style-specific 120-kD arabinogalactan protein (Schultz et al., 1997) that is taken up by pollen tubes (Lind et al., 1996) and appears to be associated with S-RNase-containing vacuoles (Goldraij et al., 2006). 120K forms complexes with S-RNases and other proteins (Cruz-Garcia et al., 2005) in vitro, and suppression of 120K expression prevents S-specific pollen rejection (Hancock et al., 2005). Protein-protein interaction assays demonstrate that 120K interacts with the pollen-specific protein NaPCCP (a pollen C2 domain-containing protein), a protein that binds phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and is associated with the pollen tube endomembrane system (Lee et al., 2008, 2009).Two models have been proposed to explain pollen rejection in Solanaceae. (1) The S-RNase degradation model (Hua and Kao, 2006; Hua et al., 2007, 2008; Kubo et al., 2010) focuses on S-RNase-SLF interactions that bring about preferential nonself S-RNase degradation. In this model, strong nonself S-RNase-SLF interactions lead to the degradation of nonself S-RNases by the ubiquitin-26S proteasome system, allowing pollen tubes to escape from its cytotoxic effect. Weak self S-RNase-SLF interactions, in contrast, permit the persistence of sufficient free S-RNase that pollen tube RNA is degraded, resulting in self-pollen rejection. Notably, by functional and protein-protein interaction assays in Petunia spp., Kubo et al. (2010) found at least three types of divergent SLF proteins encoded at the S-locus, each recognizing a subgroup of nonself S-RNases. The authors proposed the collaborative nonself recognition model, where multiple SLF proteins interact with nonself S-RNases to protect nonself pollen from degradation (Kubo et al., 2010). (2) The compartmentalization model incorporates the observations that pollen tubes internalize both self and nonself S-RNases and targets them to vacuoles and that HT-B is degraded in compatible crosses but is stable in incompatible crosses (Goldraij et al., 2006). In incompatible crosses, the S-RNase-containing vacuoles are ultimately disrupted and S-RNases are released to the cytoplasm, where they degrade RNA, leading to rejection of self-pollen. In compatible crosses, the integrity of the S-RNase-containing vacuoles is preserved, allowing pollen tube growth to continue. Thus, in this model, self or nonself S-RNase-SLF interactions determine the specificity of pollen rejection indirectly.Biochemical and genetic data show that pistil-modifier genes apart from HT-B and 120K are required for SI. We recently described NaStEP (for N. alata Stigma-Expressed Protein), an abundant, pistil-specific stigma protein found in SI Nicotiana spp. (Busot et al., 2008). Its abundance in SI species made NaStEP a strong modifier gene candidate. Here, we demonstrate that NaStEP is taken up by pollen tubes, has subtilisin inhibitory activity, and that suppressing its expression in transgenic hybrids disrupts pollen rejection. Moreover, when NaStEP-suppressed hybrids are pollinated, HT-B protein is degraded in both compatible and incompatible pollen tubes, while in wild-type SI N. alata, HT-B is preferentially stabilized in incompatible pollen tubes.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.