Central prostaglandin D2 exhibits anxiolytic-like activity via the DP1 receptor in mice

We found that prostaglandin (PG) D₂, the most abundant PG produced in the central nervous system (CNS), exhibited anxiolytic-like activity at a dose of 10–100 pmol/mouse after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in the elevated plus-maze test in mice. A DP₁ receptor-selective agonist, BW245C, mimicked the anxiolytic-like activity of PGD₂, while a DP₂ receptor agonist 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGD₂ was inactive. The anxiolytic-like activity of PGD₂ was blocked by a DP₁ antagonist, BWA868C, suggesting that PGD₂-induced anxiolytic-like activity was mediated by the DP₁ receptor. Adenosine A_2A or GABA_A receptor antagonists, SCH58261 or bicuculline, respectively, also blocked its anxiolytic-like activity. Taken together, centrally administered PGD₂ may induce anxiolytic-like activity via the A_2A and GABA_A receptors, downstream of the DP₁ receptor.     

Central prostaglandin D(2) stimulates food intake via the neuropeptide Y system in mice

We found that prostaglandin (PG) D(2), the most abundant PG in the central nervous system, stimulates food intake after intracerebroventricular administration in mice. The orexigenic effect of PGD(2) was mimicked by a selective agonist for the DP(1) receptor among two receptor subtypes for PGD(2), and abolished by its antagonist. Central administration of an antagonist or antisense oligodeoxynucleotide for the DP(1) receptor remarkably decreased food intake, body weight and fat mass. Hypothalamic mRNA levels of lipocalin-type PGD synthase were up-regulated after fasting. The orexigenic activity of PGD(2) was also abolished by an antagonist for neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(1) receptor. Taken together, PGD(2) may stimulate food intake through central DP(1) receptor coupled to the NPY system.     

Trp3, Arg5]-ghrelin(1-5) stimulates growth hormone secretion and food intake via growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide identified as an endogenous ligand for growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor, stimulates food intake and growth hormone (GH) secretion. We designed low molecular weight peptides with affinity for the GHS receptor based on the primary structure of ghrelin. We found that [Trp3, Arg5]-ghrelin(1-5) (GSWFR), a novel pentapeptide composed of all L-amino acids, had affinity for the GHS receptor (IC50 = 10 microM). GSWFR stimulated GH secretion after intravenous or oral administration. Centrally administered GSWFR increased food intake in non-fasted mice. The orexigenic action of GSWFR was inhibited by a GHS receptor antagonist, [D-Lys3]-GH-releasing peptide-6, suggesting that GSWFR stimulated food intake through the GHS receptor. The orexigenic action of GSWFR was also inhibited by a neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBO3304. These results suggest that the GSWFR-induced feeding is mediated by the NPY Y1 receptor.     

Neuropeptide Y-induced feeding is dependent on GABAA receptors in neonatal chicks

In mammals and birds, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are found in brain areas known to be involved in the control of ingestive behavior and act to increase voluntary food intake. In rats, significant evidence suggest a functional and behavioral interaction between NPY and GABA mediated transmission in various brain regions, including the arcuate and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus which can be important in the regulation of feeding behavior. In the present study, the effect of intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of NPY and GABA receptor antagonists on food intake was examined in neonatal chicks. The ICV injection of NPY strongly stimulated food intake while co-administration of NPY and picrotoxin, a GABA_A antagonist, (but not CGP54626, a GABA_B antagonist) weakened food intake induced by NPY. These results suggest that central NPY stimulates food intake in neonatal chicks by interaction with the GABAergic system via GABA_A receptors.     

Effects of neuropeptide Y on food intake and brain biogenic amines in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most potent stimulants of food intake in mammals, but very little is known about NPY actions in fish. The present study investigated the role of NPY in food intake in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Food intake was monitored at different times after intracerebroventricular administration of porcine NPY (4 or 8 microg). Both doses significantly increased food intake at 2 and 3 h, and this effect was dose-dependent. However, 50 h after administration of NPY, food intake was significantly lower than in control fish, and cumulative food intake had returned to levels similar to those seen in the control group. The NPY antagonist (D-Tyr27,36, D-Thr32)-NPY (10 microg) inhibited food intake 2 h after icv administration, but did not block the orexigenic effect of NPY when administered jointly with 4 microg NPY. To identify the NPY receptor subtypes involved in the effects of NPY on food intake, we studied the effects of the Y1 receptor agonist (Leu31, Pro34)-NPY (4 microg), the Y2 receptor agonist NPY(3-36) (4 microg), and the highly specific Y5 receptor agonist (cPP(1-7), NPY19-23, Ala31, Aib32, Gln34)-hPP (4 microg). Short-term (2 h) food intake was moderately stimulated by the Y1 agonist, more strongly stimulated by the Y2 agonist, and unaffected by the Y5 agonist. We found that administration of NPY (8 microg icv) had no effect on aminergic systems in several brain regions 2 and 50 h after NPY administration. These results indicate that NPY stimulates feeding in the rainbow trout, and suggest that this effect is cooperatively mediated by Y2- and Y1-like NPY receptors, not by Y5-like receptors.     

Importance of Orexigenic Counter‐Regulation for Multiple Targeted Feeding Inhibition

Objective: Central feeding regulation involves both anorectic and orexigenic pathways. This study examined whether targeting both systems could enhance feeding inhibition induced by anorectic neuropeptides. Research Methods and Procedures: Experiments were carried out in 24‐hour fasted rats. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections were accomplished through stereotaxically implanted cannulae aimed at the lateral cerebral ventricle. Food intake of standard rat chow pellets was subsequently recorded for 2 hours. Results: Blockade of orexigenic central opioids and neuropeptide Y (NPY) by ICV naloxone (25 μg) or the NPY receptor antagonist [d‐Trp³²]NPY (NPY‐Ant; 10 μg) powerfully augmented the feeding suppression induced by ICV glucagon‐like peptide 1 (7‐36)‐amide (GLP‐1; 10 μg) or xenin‐25 (xenin; 15 μg) in 24‐hour fasted rats. Most importantly, in combination with naloxone or NPY‐Ant, even a low and ineffective dose of GLP‐1 (5 μg) caused a 40% reduction of food intake, which was augmented further when both antagonists were given in combination with GLP‐1. The combination of GLP‐1 (5 μg) and xenin (10 μg) at individually ineffective doses caused a 46% reduction of food intake, which was abolished at a 10‐fold lower dose. This ineffective dose, however, reduced food intake by 72% when administered in combination with naloxone and NPY‐Ant. Discussion: Targeting up to four pathways of feeding regulation in the central nervous system by blockade of endogenous feeding stimuli and simultaneous administration of anorectic neuropeptides potentiated reduction of food intake. This raises a promising perspective for treatment of obesity.     

Prostaglandin D2 effects and DP1/DP2 receptor distribution in guinea pig urinary bladder out‐flow region

The proximal urethra and urinary bladder trigone play important roles in continence. We have previously shown that PGD₂ is released from guinea pig bladder urothelium/suburothelium and can inhibit detrusor contractile responses. We presently wished to investigate PGD₂ actions in guinea pig out‐flow region and the distribution of DP₁/DP₂ receptors. The effects of PGD₂ on urothelium‐intact trigone and proximal urethra contractility were studied in organ bath experiments. Expression of DP₁/DP₂ receptor proteins was analysed by western blot. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify distribution of DP₁/DP₂ receptors. PGD₂ in a dose‐dependent manner inhibited trigone contractions induced by electrical field stimulation (EFS) and inhibited spontaneous contractions of the proximal urethra. PGD₂ was equally (trigone) or slightly less potent (urethra) compared with PGE₂. Expression of DP₁ and DP₂ receptors was found in male guinea pig bladder trigone, neck and proximal urethra. In the trigone and proximal urethra, DP₁ receptors were found on the membrane of smooth muscle cells and weak immunoreactivty was observed in the urothelium. DP₂ receptors were distributed more widespread, weakly and evenly in the urothelium and smooth muscles. Inhibitory effects by PGD₂ on motor activity of guinea pig trigone and proximal urethra are consistent with finding DP₁ and DP₂ receptors located in the urothelium and smooth muscle cells of the trigone and proximal urethra, and PGD₂ may therefore be a modulator of the bladder out‐flow region, possibly having a function in regulation of micturition and a role in overactive bladder syndrome.     

NPY Y1 receptor is involved in ghrelin- and fasting-induced increases in foraging, food hoarding, and food intake

Fasting triggers a constellation of physiological and behavioral changes, including increases in peripherally produced ghrelin and centrally produced hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY). Refeeding stimulates food intake in most species; however, hamsters primarily increase foraging and food hoarding with smaller increases in food intake. Fasting-induced increases in foraging and food hoarding in Siberian hamsters are mimicked by peripheral ghrelin, central NPY, and NPY Y1 receptor agonist injections. Because fasting stimulates ghrelin and subsequently NPY synthesis/release, it may be that fasting-induced increased hoarding is mediated by NPY Y1 receptor activation. Therefore, we asked: Can an Y1 receptor antagonist block fasting- or ghrelin-induced increases in foraging, food hoarding, and food intake? This was accomplished by injecting the NPY Y1 receptor antagonist 1229U91 intracerebroventricularly in hamsters fasted, fed, or given peripheral ghrelin injections and housed in a running wheel-based food delivery foraging system coupled with simulated-burrow housing. Three foraging conditions were used: 1) no running wheel access, free food, 2) running wheel access, free food, or 3) foraging requirement (10 revolutions/pellet) for food. Fasting was a more potent stimulator of foraging and food hoarding than ghrelin. Concurrent injections of 1229U91 completely blocked fasting- and ghrelin-induced increased foraging and food intake and attenuated, but did not always completely block, fasting- and ghrelin-induced increases in food hoarding. Collectively, these data suggest that the NPY Y1 receptor is important for the effects of ghrelin- and fasting-induced increases in foraging and food intake, but other NPY receptors and/or other neurochemical systems are involved in increases in food hoarding.     

Effects of intracerebroventricular administration of the NPY-Y1 receptor antagonist, 1229U91, on hyperphagic and glycemic responses to acute and chronic intermediate insulin-induced hypoglycemia in female rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptors are implicated in CNS regulation of food intake, but their role in hypoglycemic hyperphagia remains unclear. The present studies utilized a pharmacological approach to investigate the hypothesis that NPY acts via Y1 receptor-dependent mechanisms to regulate feeding and blood glucose profiles during intermediate insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Groups of ovariectomized, estradiol benzoate-treated female rats were injected subcutaneously with one or four doses of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH), on as many days, or with diluent alone. Before final treatments on day four, the animals were pretreated by intracerebroventricular (icv) delivery of the NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, 1229U91, or the vehicle, artificial cerebrospinal fluid (acsf). Food intake during acute hypoglycemia was significantly diminished between t_o and + 2 h in animals pretreated with the Y1 receptor antagonist versus vehicle. Administration of 1229U91 prior to the fourth of four NPH doses suppressed hypoglycemic hyperphagia over a relatively longer interval, e.g. 4 h, after t_o relative to the acute insulin group. Blood glucose levels after a single NPH injection were similar in acsf- and antagonist-pretreated rats at + 2, + 4, and + 6 h, but were lower at + 9 h in the latter group. Pretreatment with 1229U91 did not modify glucose profiles between + 2 and + 9 h after multiple dosing with NPH, but prevented recovery from hypoglycemia at + 12 h. The present results show that central NPY Y1 receptor antagonism inhibits hypoglycemic hyperphagia, and that this suppressive effect on feeding was of greater duration during recurring hypoglycemia. The data also show that Y1 receptor blockade decreases glycemic responses to both single and serial NPH dosing, albeit at different post-injection time points. The current studies support the view that NPY Y1 receptors function within central neural pathways that govern feeding and glycemic responses to intermediate-acting insulin, and that Y1 receptor-mediated stimulation of food intake may habituate in a positive manner to repetitive insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of chronic insulin-induced hypoglycemia on neuropeptide Y neurotransmission and Y1 receptor expression within regulatory circuitries that control food intake and glucostasis.     

Orexigenic effect of the melanocortin MC4 receptor antagonist HS014 is inhibited only partially by neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor selective antagonists

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and melanocortin (MC) peptides have opposite effects on food intake: NPY-like peptides and MC receptor antagonists stimulate feeding and increase body weight, whereas melanocortins and NPY antagonists inhibit food intake. In this study we tested whether the orexigenic effect of the selective MC4 receptor antagonist HS014 (1 nmol) could be inhibited by three different NPY antagonists, (R)-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxy-phenyl)methyl]D-argininam ide (BIBP3226), (R)-N-[[4-(aminocarbonylaminomethyl)-phenyl]methyl]-N2(diphenyl acetyl)-argininamidetrifluoroacetate (BIBO3304), and decapeptide [D-Tyr(27,36)D-Thr32]NPY(27-36), after icv administration in freely feeding male rats. All three NPY receptor antagonists inhibited the orexigenic effects of HS014 partially and with markedly different potency. [D-Tyr(27,36)D-Thr32]NPY(27-36) was active only in subconvulsive dose. The NPY Y1 selective antagonist BIBP3226 was more effective in inhibiting the effect of HS014 than BIBO3304 despite in vitro data indicating that BIBP3226 is about 10 times less potent than BIBO3304 at NPY Y1 receptor. An enantiomer of BIBO3304, BIBO3457, failed to inhibit HS014-induced feeding, indicating that the effects of BIBO3304 were stereoselective. These results suggest that stimulation of food intake caused by weakening of melanocortinergic tone at the MC4 receptor is partially but not exclusively related to NPY Y1 receptor activation.     

The CCKB antagonist CI988 reduces food intake in fasted rats via a dopamine mediated pathway

Studies have shown a reduction of food intake following peripheral and brain injection of CCK. However, it remains to be established whether endogenous central CCK is involved in the regulation of food intake. We investigated the role of central CCK in the regulation of food intake by pharmacological manipulation of the CCK_B (CCK₂) receptor system. Intracerebroventricularly (ICV) cannulated male Sprague Dawley rats were fasted for 24 h and received an ICV injection of the CCK_B receptor antagonist CI988 at a dose of 10 nmol or 49 nmol or vehicle. Another group received two consecutive ICV injections consisting of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor-1 (CRF₁) antagonist, CP376395 (3 nmol) or the CRF₂ receptor antagonist, K41498 (2 nmol) alone, or followed by CI988 (49 nmol). Lastly, another group of rats received an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of the dopamine antagonist, flupentixol (∼197 and ∼493 nmol/kg) alone, or followed by CI988 (49 nmol, ICV). Cumulative food intake was assessed for 11 h. Vehicle injected rats showed a robust feeding response. CI988 at 49 nmol reduced food intake by 30% starting at 2 h post injection. CP376395 and K41498 had no effect on food intake. Flupentixol injected IP at a dose of 197 and 493 nmol/kg alone did not modulate food intake whereas the higher dose blocked the CI988-induced reduction of feeding. During the dark phase, CI988 had no effect on food intake in unfasted rats. In summary, CCK_B signaling is involved in the regulation of food intake after a fast likely by downstream dopamine signaling.     

PYY(3-36) into the arcuate nucleus inhibits food deprivation-induced increases in food hoarding and intake

Central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) increases food intake in laboratory rats and mice, as well as food foraging and hoarding in Siberian hamsters. The NPY-Y1 and Y5 receptors (Rs) within the hypothalamus appear sufficient to account for these increases in ingestive behaviors. Stimulation of NPY-Y2Rs in the Arcuate nucleus (Arc) has an anorexigenic effect as shown by central or peripheral administration of its natural ligand peptide YY (3-36) and pharmacological NPY-Y2R antagonism by BIIE0246 increases food intake. Both effects on food intake by NPY-Y2R agonism and antagonism are relatively short-lived lasting ∼4 h. The role of NPY-Y2Rs in appetitive ingestive behaviors (food foraging/hoarding) is untested, however. Therefore, Siberians hamsters, a natural food hoarder, were housed in a semi-natural burrow/foraging system that had (a) foraging requirement (10 revolutions/pellet), no free food (true foraging group), (b) no running wheel access, free food (general malaise control) or (c) running wheel access, free food (exercise control). We microinjected BIIE0246 (antagonist) and PYY_(3-36) (agonist) into the Arc to test the role of NPY-Y2Rs there on ingestive behaviors. Food foraging, hoarding, and intake were not affected by Arc BIIE0246 microinjection in fed hamsters 1, 2, 4, and 24 h post injection. Stimulation of NPY-Y2Rs by PYY_(3-36) inhibited food intake at 0–1 and 1–2 h and food hoarding at 1–2 h without causing general malaise or affecting foraging. Collectively, these results implicate a sufficiency, but not necessity, of the Arc NPY-Y2R in the inhibition of food intake and food hoarding by Siberian hamsters.     

D-Trp(34)] neuropeptide Y is a potent and selective neuropeptide Y Y(5) receptor agonist with dramatic effects on food intake

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(5) receptor has been proposed to mediate several physiological effects of NPY, including the potent orexigenic activity of the peptide. However, the lack of selective NPY Y(5) receptor ligands limits the characterization of the physiological roles of this receptor. Screening of several analogs of NPY revealed that [D-Trp(34)]NPY is a potent and selective NPY Y(5) receptor agonist. Unlike the prototype selective NPY Y(5) receptor agonist [D-Trp(32)]NPY, [D-Trp(34)]NPY markedly increases food intake in rats, an effect that is blocked by the selective NPY Y(5) receptor antagonist CGP 71683A. These data demonstrate that [D-Trp(34)]NPY is a useful tool for studies aimed at determining the physiological roles of the NPY Y(5) receptor.     

Neuropeptide Y effect on food intake in broiler and layer chicks

Broiler chicks eat more food than layer chicks. In this study, we examined the involvement of orexigenic peptide neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the difference in food intake between broiler and layer chicks (Gallus gallus). First, we compared the hypothalamic mRNA levels of NPY and its receptors (Y1 and Y5 receptors) between these strains at 1, 2, 4, and 8 days of age. Daily food intake was significantly higher in broiler chicks than layer chicks after 2 days of age. However, the hypothalamic NPY mRNA level was significantly lower in broiler chicks than layer chicks except at 8 days of age. In addition, the mRNA levels of NPY receptors were also significantly lower in broiler chicks than layer chicks at 2 and 4 days of age (Y1 receptor) or 2 days of age (Y5 receptor). These results suggest that the differences in the expressions of hypothalamic NPY and its receptors do not cause the increase in food intake in broiler chicks. To compare the orexigenic effect of NPY between broiler and layer chicks, we next examined the effects of central administration of NPY on food intake in these strains. In both strains, central administration of NPY significantly increased food intake at 2, 4 and 8 days of age. All our findings demonstrated that the increase in food intake in broiler chicks is not accompanied with the over-expression of NPY or its receptor.     

Regulation of food intake in the goldfish by interaction between ghrelin and orexin

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of ghrelin, orexin and neuropeptide Y (NPY) stimulates food intake in goldfish. Orexin and NPY interact with each other in the regulation of feeding, while ghrelin-induced feeding has also shown to be mediated by NPY in the goldfish model. To investigate the interaction between ghrelin and orexin, we examined the effects of a selective orexin receptor-1 antagonist, SB334867, and a growth hormone secretagogue-receptor antagonist, [D-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6, on ghrelin- and orexin-A-induced feeding. Ghrelin-induced food intake was completely inhibited for 1h following ICV preinjection of SB334867, while [D-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6 attenuated orexin-A stimulated feeding. Furthermore, ICV administration of ghrelin or orexin-A at a dose sufficient to stimulate food intake increased the expression of each other's mRNA in the diencephalon. These results indicate that, in goldfish, ghrelin and orexin-A have interacting orexigenic effects in the central nervous system. This is the first report that orexin-A-induced feeding is mediated by the ghrelin signaling in any animal model.     

The role of brain somatostatin receptor 2 in the regulation of feeding and drinking behavior

Somatostatin was discovered four decades ago as hypothalamic factor inhibiting growth hormone release. Subsequently, somatostatin was found to be widely distributed throughout the brain and to exert pleiotropic actions via interaction with five somatostatin receptors (sst_1–5) that are also widely expressed throughout the brain. Interestingly, in contrast to the predominantly inhibitory actions of peripheral somatostatin, the activation of brain sst₂ signaling by intracerebroventricular injection of stable somatostatin agonists potently stimulates food intake and independently, drinking behavior in rodents. The orexigenic response involves downstream orexin-1, neuropeptide Y₁ and μ receptor signaling while the dipsogenic effect is mediated through the activation of the brain angiotensin 1 receptor. Brain sst₂ activation is part of mechanisms underlying the stimulation of feeding and more prominently water intake in the dark phase and is able to counteract the anorexic response to visceral stressors.     

Molecular characterization of the ligand–receptor interaction of the neuropeptide Y family

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belong to the NPY hormone family and activate a class of receptors called the Y‐receptors, and also belong to the large superfamily of the G‐protein coupled receptors. Structure–affinity and structure–activity relationship studies of peptide analogs, combined with studies based on site‐directed mutagenesis and anti‐receptor antibodies, have given insight into the individual characterization of each receptor subtype relative to its interaction with the ligand, as well as to its biological function. A number of selective antagonists at the Y₁‐receptor are available whose structures resemble that of the C‐terminus of NPY. Some of these compounds, like BIBP3226, BIBO3304 and GW1229, have recently been used for in vivo investigations of the NPY‐induced increase in food intake. Y₂‐receptor selective agonists are the analog cyclo‐(28/32)‐Ac‐[Lys²⁸‐Glu³²]‐(25–36)‐pNPY and the TASP molecule containing two units of the NPY segment 21–36. Now the first antagonist with nanomolar affinity for the Y₂‐receptor is also known, BIIE0246. So far, the native peptide PP has been shown to be the most potent ligand at the Y₄‐receptor. However, by the design of PP/NPY chimera, some analogs have been found that bind not only to the Y₄‐, but also to the Y₅‐receptor with subnanomolar affinities, and are as potent as NPY at the Y₁‐receptor. For the characterization of the Y₅‐receptor in vitro and in vivo, a new class of highly selective agonists is now available. This consists of analogs of NPY and of PP/NPY chimera which all contain the motif Ala³¹‐Aib³². This motif has been shown to induce a 3₁₀‐helical turn in the region 28–31 of NPY and is suggested to be the key motif for high Y₅‐receptor selectivity. The results of feeding experiments in rats treated with the first highly specific Y₅‐receptor agonists support the hypothesis that this receptor plays a role in the NPY‐induced stimulation of food intake. In conclusion, the selective compounds for the different Y‐receptor subtypes known so far are promising tools for a better understanding of the physiological properties of the hormones of the NPY family and related receptors. Copyright © 2000 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Rubimetide,humanin, and MMK1 exert anxiolytic-like activities via the formyl peptide receptor 2 in mice followed by the successive activation of DP1, A2A,and GABAA receptors

Rubimetide (Met-Arg-Trp), which had been isolated as an antihypertensive peptide from an enzymatic digest of spinach ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), showed anxiolytic-like activity prostaglandin (PG) D₂-dependent manner in the elevated plus-maze test after administration at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg (ip.) or 1 mg/kg (p.o.) in male mice of ddY strain. In this study, we found that rubimetide has weak affinities for the FPR1 and FPR2, subtypes of formyl peptide receptor (FPR). The anxiolytic-like activity of rubimetide (0.1 mg/kg, ip.) was blocked by WRW4, an antagonist of FPR2, but not by Boc-FLFLF, an antagonist of FPR1, suggesting that the anxiolytic-like activity was mediated by the FPR2. Humanin, an endogenous agonist peptide of the FPR2, exerted an anxiolytic-like activity after intracerebroventricular (icv) administration, which was also blocked by WRW4. MMK1, a synthetic agonist peptide of the FPR2, also exerted anxiolytic-like activity. Thus, FPR2 proved to mediate anxiolytic-like effect as the first example of central effect exerted by FPR agonists. As well as the anxiolytic-like activity of rubimetide, that of MMK1 was blocked by BW A868C, an antagonist of the DP₁-receptor. Furthermore, anxiolytic-like activity of rubimetide was blocked by SCH58251 and bicuculline, antagonists for adenosine A_2A and GABA_A receptors, respectively. From these results, it is concluded that the anxiolytic-like activities of rubimetide and typical agonist peptides of the FPR2 were mediated successively by the PGD₂-DP₁ receptor, adenosine-A_2A receptor, and GABA-GABA_A receptor systems downstream of the FPR2.