Insulin allergy and extensive lipoatrophy in child with type 1 diabetes

Insulin allergy and lipoatrophy in type 1 diabetic patients have been previously reported but the mechanisms are not well documented. Here, we report a case emphasizing the role of abnormal local immune reaction associated with cytokine hyper production. The patient is a 7-year-old boy with a familial history of common variable immunodeficiency. Eight months after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, he developed signs of insulin allergy expressed as continuously extensive and profound lipoatrophy contrasting with a well-preserved metabolic control. Specific insulin allergy was confirmed by skin prick tests that showed lymphoid activated cells in the subcutaneous tissue at the site of insulin injection. All therapies reported in the literature (antihistaminic, local steroid, change to lispro insulin, immunosuppressive treatment, subcutaneous insulin pump, peritoneal insulin infusion) were not efficient. It is suggested that familial disorders of immune cell functions with abnormal and excessive cytokine production might explain these adverse effects triggered by insulin with severe allergic reactions and lipoatrophy.     

甘精胰岛素联用瑞格列奈治疗初诊2型糖尿病的疗效研究

目的:通过甘精胰岛素联用瑞格列奈与预混人工合成胰岛素(诺和灵30R)治疗初诊2型糖尿病患者的比较,探讨其疗效与安全性.方法:将初诊2型糖尿病患者随机分为甘精胰岛素+瑞格列奈组(A组)和诺和灵30R组(B组),根据血糖情况调整用药剂量.治疗12周后,比较两组的空腹血糖、餐后2小时血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、体重指数(BMI)和低血糖发生率.结果:A组低血糖事件明显少于B组,在餐后2小时血糖方面也优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在空腹血糖、HbA1c和BMI方面差异无统计学意义(p0.05).结论:甘精胰岛素与瑞格列奈联用对于初诊2型糖尿病患者,其血糖控制满意,餐后血糖更加平稳,低血糖发生率低,是一种针对初诊2型糖尿病患者安全、有效、方便的治疗方案.     

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Insulin sensitivity study

Objective: Our goal was to test any association between human plasma circulating levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (cMCP‐1) and insulin resistance and to compare monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1) adipose tissue gene expression and cMCP‐1 in relation with inflammatory markers. Research Methods and Procedures: cMCP‐1 was measured in n = 116 consecutive control male subjects to whom an insulin sensitivity (S_i) test was performed. Circulating levels of soluble CD14, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type 2 (sTNFR2), soluble interleukin‐6 (sIL‐6), and adiponectin also were measured. Subcutaneous adipose tissue samples were obtained from n = 107 non‐diabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects with different degrees of obesity. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction was used to measure gene expression of MCP‐1, CD68, tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), and its receptor TNFR2. Results: In the S_i study, no independent effect of cMCP‐1 levels on insulin sensitivity was observed. In the expression study, in non‐diabetic subjects, MCP‐1 mRNA had a positive correlation with BMI (r = 0.407, p = 0.003), TNF‐α mRNA (r = 0.419, p = 0.002), and TNFR2 mRNA (r = 0.410, p = 0.003). In these subjects, cMCP‐1 was found to correlate with waist‐to‐hip ratio (r = 0.322, p = 0.048). In patients with type 2 diabetes, MCP‐1 mRNA was up‐regulated compared with non‐diabetic subjects. TNF‐α mRNA was found to independently contribute to MCP‐1 mRNA expression. In this group, CD68 mRNA was found to correlate with BMI (r = 0.455, p = 0.001). Discussion: cMCP‐1 is not associated with insulin sensitivity in apparently healthy men. TNF‐α is the inflammatory cytokine associated with MCP‐1 expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue.     

GLP-1 for type 2 diabetes

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapy of type 2 diabetes is executed either by GLP-1 receptor agonists, which stimulate the GLP-1 receptors, or by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, which prevent the inactivation of endogenous GLP-1 thereby increasing the concentration of endogenous active GLP-1. GLP-1 activates pancreatic receptors resulting in improved glycemia through glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon secretion. There is also a potential beta cell preservation effect, as judged from rodent studies. GLP-1 receptors are additionally expressed in extrapancreatic tissue, having potential for the treatment to reduce body weight and to potentially have beneficial cardio- and endothelioprotective effects. Clinical trials in subjects with type 2 diabetes have shown that in periods of 12 weeks or more, these treatments reduce HbA_1c by ≈ 0.8–1.1% from baseline levels of 7.7–8.5%, and they are efficient both as monotherapy and in combination therapy with metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones or insulin. Furthermore, GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce body weight, whereas DPP-4 inhibitors are body weight neutral. The treatment is safe with very low risk for adverse events, including hypoglycaemia. GLP-1 based therapy is thus a novel and now well established therapy of type 2 diabetes, with a particular value in combination with metformin in patients who are inadequately controlled by metformin alone.     

Cellular therapies for type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a disease that results from the selective autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing beta-cells. This disease process lends itself to cellular therapy because of the single cell nature of insulin production. Murine models have provided opportunities for the study of cellular therapies for the treatment of diabetes, including the investigation of islet transplantation, and also the possibility of stem cell therapies and islet regeneration. Studies in islet transplantation have included both allo- and xeno-transplantation and have allowed for the study of new approaches for the reversal of autoimmunity and achieving immune tolerance. Stem cells from hematopoietic sources such as bone marrow and fetal cord blood, as well as from the pancreas, intestine, liver, and spleen promise either new sources of islets or may function as stimulators of islet regeneration. This review will summarize the various cellular interventions investigated as potential treatments of T1DM.     

Cell replacement therapy for type 1 diabetes

Replacement of the insulin-producing pancreatic islet beta cells represents the ultimate treatment for type 1 diabetes. Recent advances in islet transplantation underscore the urgent need for developing alternatives to human tissue donors, which are scarce. Two possible approaches are the expansion of differentiated beta cells by reversible immortalization and the generation of insulin-producing cells from embryonic or adult stem cells. It is possible that new insights into endocrine pancreas development will ultimately lead to manipulation of progenitor-cell fate towards the beta-cell phenotype of insulin production, storage and regulated secretion. Both allogeneic and autologous surrogate beta cells are likely to require protection from recurring autoimmunity. This protection might take the form of tolerization, cell encapsulation, or cell engineering with immunoprotective genes. If successful, these approaches could lead to widespread cell replacement therapy for type 1 diabetes.     

CYP27B1 polymorphisms variants are associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Germans

CYP27B1 (25-hydroxyvitamin D(3)-1alpha-hydroxylase) catalyzes the metabolization of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) to 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) the most active natural Vitamin D metabolite. 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) plays a role in the regulation of autoimmunity and cell proliferation and prevents the development of autoimmune diabetes mellitus in animal models besides other autoimmune disorders. One hundred and eighty-seven families with one offspring affected with type1diabetes mellitus were genotyped for the polymorphisms in the promoter region (-1260 C/A) and intron 6 (2338 T/C) of the CYP27B1 gene on chromosome 12 q13.1-13.3 and extended transmission disequilibrium tests (ETDT) were performed. The haplotype CT (-1260 A/2338 T) was significantly more often transmitted to affected offspring (96 transmitted (T) versus 63 not transmitted (NT), P = 0.0089). While the AT (-1260 C/2838 T) was significantly less often transmitted (37 T versus 60 NT, P = 0.0195). This study suggests that CYP27B1 haplotypes may confer susceptibility to type 1 diabetes mellitus in Germans.     

Insulin resistance,intramyocellular lipid content,and plasma adiponectin in patients with type 1 diabetes

Insulin resistance is a key pathogenic factor of type 2 diabetes (T2DM); in contrast, in type 1 diabetes (T1DM) it is considered a secondary alteration. Increased intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content accumulation and reduced plasma adiponectin were suggested to be pathogenic events of insulin resistance in T2DM. This study was designed to assess whether IMCL content and plasma adiponectin were also associated with the severity of insulin resistance in T1DM. We studied 18 patients with T1DM, 7 older and overweight/obese patients with T2DM, and 15 nondiabetic, insulin-resistant offspring of T2DM parents (OFF) and 15 healthy individuals (NOR) as appropriate control groups matched for anthropometric features with T1DM patients by means of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with the infusion of [6,6-2H2]glucose and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the calf muscles. T1DM and T2DM patients showed reduced insulin-stimulated glucose metabolic clearance rate (MCR: 5.1 +/- 0.6 and 3.2 +/- 0.8 ml x kg(-1) min(-1)) similar to OFF (5.3 +/- 0.4 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) compared with NOR (8.5 +/- 0.5 ml x kg(-1) min(-1), P < 0.001). Soleus IMCL content was increased in T1DM (112 +/- 15 AU), T2DM (108 +/- 10 AU) and OFF (82 +/- 13 AU) compared with NOR (52 +/- 7 AU, P < 0.05) and the result was inversely proportional to the MCR (R2 = 0.27, P < 0.001); an association between IMCL content and Hb A1c was found only in T1DM (R2 = 0.57, P < 0.001). Fasting plasma adiponectin was reduced in T2DM (7 +/- 1 microg/ml, P = 0.01) and OFF (11 +/- 1 microg/ml, P = 0.03) but not in T1DM (25 +/- 6 microg/ml), whose plasma level was increased with respect to both OFF (P = 0.03) and NOR (16 +/- 2 microg/ml, P = 0.05). In conclusion, in T1DM, T2DM, and OFF, IMCL content was associated with insulin resistance, demonstrating that IMCL accretion is a marker of insulin resistance common to both primary genetically determined and secondary metabolic (chronic hyperglycemia) alterations. The increased adiponectin levels in insulin-resistant patients with T1DM, in contrast to the reduced levels found in patients with T2DM and in OFF, demonstrated that the relationship of adiponectin to insulin resistance in humans is still unclear.     

Stem cell therapies for type 1 diabetes mellitus

The present review discusses the use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM 1). It has been observed that high dose immunosuppression followed by HSCT shows better results among other immunotherapeutic treatments for the disease as the patients with adequate beta cell reserve achieve insulin independence. However, this response is not maintained and reoccurrence of the disease is major a major challenge to use HSCT in future to prevent or control relapse of DM 1.     

Insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes -- role of the adipokines

The role of adipocytes as protein secreting cells has been known for almost 15 years. Most of these proteins have known biological activity and are called adipokines. However, only a few of the adipokines have been shown to regulate insulin sensitivity. The latter effects are direct or indirect. The adipokines regulating insulin sensitivity are tumor necrosis factor alpha, adiponectin, interleukin-6, resistin and leptin. This review examines the mechanism how these adipokines influence insulin sensitivity, how the adipocyte production of the adipokines is regulated and if genetic variance in the genes encoding for adipokines is important for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes are not related to resistin expression in human fat cells or skeletal muscle.

Resistin is secreted by rodent fat cells and was recently postulated to be an important link between obesity and insulin resistance. We examined Resistin gene expression with real-time RT-PCR in human isolated fat cells, adipose tissue, and muscle from 42 individuals of varying degrees of overweight and who had normal insulin sensitivity or were insulin-resistant or Type 2 diabetic. Resistin was not expressed in human muscle nor was it expressed in most human isolated fat cells or intact biopsies. No difference was found between normal, insulin-resistant, or Type 2 diabetic samples. However, a very low but specific Resistin expression could be demonstrated in isolated fat cells and intact adipose tissue from some individuals (n = 3 and n = 4, respectively). There was no evidence for the expression of splice variants in the human samples. Thus, Resistin does not seem to be an important link to insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes in human.