Association between milk production and treatment response of ovarian cysts in lactating dairy cows using the Ovsynch protocol

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the level of milk production on the day of diagnosis of ovarian cysts and treatment response using the Ovsynch protocol. On the day of cyst diagnosis (Day 0), 260 lactating dairy cows with ovarian cysts were treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), PGF2alpha on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, and timed inseminated 16-20 h later (Ovsynch protocol). Pregnancy was determined (by transrectal palpation) between 42 and 49 days after insemination. On Day 0, data for milk production (kg/day), parity, days in milk (DIM), and body condition score (BCS) were recorded. Using the median value for milk production on the day of diagnosis, cows were classified as high producers (>28.5 kg) and low producers (or=0.05). Primiparous cows were more likely (adjusted odds ratio: AOR=3.63; 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals=1.28-10.30; P相似文献   

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows, II: assigning protocols according to stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus

Pregnancy rates were compared in lactating dairy cows (n = 1083) assigned to protocols for resynchronization of ovulation based on stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows were detected not pregnant by ultrasonography 30 d after a previous AI (study day 0) and classified as diestrus, metestrus, proestrus, with ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows in diestrus (January-May) were assigned to either Ovsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, GnRH day 9, and timed-AI [TAI] 16 h later; n = 96), or Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, estradiol cypionate [ECP] day 1, AI at detected estrus [AIDE] on day 2, or TAI on day 3; n = 96). Cows in diestrus (June-December) were assigned to either Ovsynch (n = 156) or Modified Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, ECP day 1, AIDE days 2 and 3, and to Ovsynch on day 4 if not detected in estrus; n = 142). Cows in metestrus were assigned either to Ovsynch (n = 68), Heatsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, ECP day 8, AIDE day 9, or TAI day 10; n = 62), or GnRH + Ovsynch (GnRH on day 0, followed by Ovsynch on day 8; n = 64). Cows in proestrus, with ovarian cysts, or anestrus were assigned to either Ovsynch (proestrus n = 89, ovarian cysts n = 97, anestrus n = 8) or GnRH + Ovsynch (proestrus n = 87, ovarian cysts n = 109, anestrus n = 9). Pregnancy rate was evaluated 30, 55 and 90 d after resynchronized AI. For cows in diestrus (January-May), pregnancy rates were higher for Ovsynch (35.9, 29.2 and 26.0%) than for Quicksynch (21.7, 16.7 and 15.6%). For cows in diestrus (June-December), pregnancy rates were similar for Ovsynch (34.4, 24.0 and 23.6%) and Modified Quicksynch (27.1, 26.2 and 21.6%). For cows in metestrus, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (33.3, 24.5 and 20.3%) than for Heatsynch (20.3, 12.9 and 9.8%). For cows with ovarian cysts, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (30.3, 26.6 and 22.9%) than for Ovsynch (20.2, 18.5 and 14.7%). Assignment to resynchronization protocols based on the stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts improved pregnancy rates.     

Effect of pretreatment with bovine somatotropin (bST) and/or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on conception rate of dairy cows with ovarian cysts subjected to synchronization of ovulation and timed insemination

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment with bovine somatotropin (bST) and/or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) 7 days prior to initiation of a protocol for synchronization of ovulation and timed insemination (Ovsynch) on conception rate (CR) of cows with ovarian cysts. A total of 254 lactating dairy cows with ovarian cysts was divided into four groups (Day 0). On Day 0, cows in Group 1 (n = 61) were pretreated with 500 mg bST, s.q., and 100 microg GnRH, i.m.; cows in Group 2 (n = 73) were pretreated with 100 microg GnRH, i.m.; cows in Group 3 (n = 59) were pretreated with 500 mg bST, s.q.; and cows in Group 4 (n = 61) received no pretreatment. All cows were subjected to the Ovsynch protocol 7 days later. All cows previously received routine bST treatment every 14 days until milk production decreased to a minimum level established by the management of the herd. CR was assessed using logistic regression after adjusting for timing of concurrent bST treatment relative to Day 0, parity, season at time of insemination, and days in milk (DIM) on Day 0. CR for cows in Group 3 (12%) was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that for cows in Group 4 (27%), and CR for cows in Group 1 (18%) and Group 2 (15%) tended to be lower (P < 0.10) than that for cows in Group 4 (27%). From the results of this study, it was concluded that bST pretreatment decreased CR, and pretreatment with GnRH, and GnRH with bST tended to decrease CR in lactating dairy cows with ovarian cysts concurrently treated with bST and subjected to the Ovsynch protocol.     

Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows

Recently a protocol was developed that precisely synchronizes the time of ovulation in lactating dairy cows (Ovsynch; GnRH-7d-PGF2 alpha-2d-GnRH). We evaluated whether initiation of Ovsynch on different days of the estrous cycle altered the effectiveness of this protocol. The percentage of cows (n = 156) ovulating to the first GnRH was 64% and varied (P < 0.01) by stage of estrous cycle. Treatment with PGF2 alpha was effective, with 93% of cows having low progesterone at second GnRH. The overall percentage of cows that ovulated after second GnRH (synchronization rate) was 87% and varied by response to first GnRH (92% if ovulation to first GnRH vs 79% if no ovulation; P < 0.05). There were 6% of cows that ovulated before the second injection of GnRH and 7% with no detectable ovulation by 48 h after second GnRH. Maximal diameter of the ovulatory follicle varied by stage of estrous cycle, with cows in which Ovsynch was initiated at midcycle having the smallest follicles. In addition, milk production and serum progesterone concentration on the day of PGF2 alpha affected (P < 0.05) size of the ovulatory follicle. Using these results we analyzed pregnancy rate at Days 28 and 98 after AI for cows (n = 404) in which Ovsynch was initiated on known days of the estrous cycle. Pregnancy rate was lower for cows expected to ovulate larger follicles than those expected to ovulate smaller follicles (P < 0.05; 32 vs 42%). Thus, although overall synchronization rate with Ovsynch was above 85%, there were clear differences in response according to day of protocol initiation. Cows in which Ovsynch was initiated near midcycle had smaller ovulatory follicles and greater pregnancy rates.     

Ultrasonographic evaluation of endometrial thickness near timed AI as a predictor of fertility in high-producing dairy cows

The objectives were to evaluate changes in endometrial thickness (ET) near the time of a synchronized ovulation and to assess the relationship of ET and fertility in lactating Holstein cows, with or without estrogen supplementation near timed ovulation. In Experiment 1, eight cows were examined with transrectal ultrasonography, once daily for 5 d, starting concurrent with PGF_2α (PGF) treatment during an Ovsynch protocol (GnRH - 7d - PGF - 72h - GnRH). The ET increased rapidly after PGF (from ∼7 to ∼9.5 mm), remained > 9 mm for the next 2 d, then decreased to ∼8 and 7.4 mm, 1 and 2 d, respectively, after the second GnRH. In Experiment 2,642 cows (total of 758 breedings) were subjected to an Ovsynch protocol (GnRH - 7d - PGF - 56h - GnRH - 16h - timed AI); cows received either no further treatment (Ovsynch) or 1 mg of estradiol-17β im 8 h before the second GnRH (Ovsynch + E2). For both uterine horns, ET was measured (∼2 cm from the internal uterine body bifurcation) before E2 treatment (48 h after PGF). In cows with ET ≤ 8 mm vs > 8 mm, rates of ovulation were 86.0% (n = 136) vs 98.1% (n = 472; P < 0.01), respectively, and percentage pregnant per AI (P/AI) were 26.7% (n = 146) vs 42.7% (n = 524; P < 0.01). Treatment with E2 increased P/AI in cows with lower ET (Ovsynch + E2 = 37.0% vs Ovsynch = 23.3%; P = 0.07), but did not significantly improve P/AI in cows with ET > 8 mm (Ovsynch + E2 = 43.4% vs Ovsynch = 42.1%). In conclusion, a single ultrasonographic evaluation of ET in Holstein cows 48 h after PGF treatment in an Ovsynch program was a good predictor of ovulation failure and pregnancy success. Perhaps poor fertility in cows with reduced ET was low peripheral E2 concentrations near AI, poor P4 priming, or luteolysis failure during timed AI procedures.     

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows treated with cloprostenol at the time of insemination

The effect of intravenous cloprostenol treatment at the time of insemination on reproductive performance was consecutively evaluated in three different subpopulations of high producing lactating dairy cows: Study (1) early postpartum synchronized and fixed-time inseminated (about 50 days in milk) cows (n = 379: 187 control and 192 treated cows); Study (2) presumed high fertility cows first inseminated between 90 and 120 days postpartum (n = 248: 124 control and 124 treated cows); and Study (3) heat stressed repeat breeder cows (n = 183: 93 control and 90 treated cows). Data were analyzed using multiple regression methods. Study 1: Parity (primiparous versus multiparous), milk production, body condition score at AI, insemination season (cool versus warm period) and treatment were included in the analysis as potential factors affecting ovulation, double ovulation, return to estrus, and pregnancy to first AI and to second AI (first AI plus return AI) rates. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the final model for ovulation rate only included the interaction (P = 0.002) between insemination season and treatment. Cloprostenol treatment at insemination led to a 4.2-fold increase in the ovulation rate in cows inseminated during the warm period. There were no significant effects of treatment, parity, milk production, body score or the insemination season on the return to estrus rate. The only variables included in the final logistic model for double ovulation and pregnancy to first AI rates were treatment and season, respectively. Treatment led to a 2.6-fold increase (P = 0.001) in the double ovulation rate, whereas cows inseminated in the warm period were 2.1 times less likely (P = 0.007) to become pregnant at first AI compared to those inseminated in the cool season. The variables included in the final logistic model for the pregnancy rate to second AI were treatment and season. Cloprostenol given at AI increased the risk of pregnancy 1.9 times (P = 0.002), and cows inseminated during the warm season were two times less likely to become pregnant (P = 0.003). No significant interactions were found among these three dependent variables (double ovulation and pregnancy to first and to second AI rates). Study 2: Logistic regression analysis of all the dependent variables: return to estrus, and pregnancy to first and to second AI (first AI plus return to AI) rates indicated no significant effects of treatment, parity, days in milk, milk production or body score at AI. No significant interactions were found. Study 3: The final model for the pregnancy rate only included the interaction between parity (primiparous versus multiparous) and treatment. Days in milk, milk production and insemination number showed no significant effect on pregnancy rate. Cloprostenol treatment at insemination increased the pregnancy rate in primiparous repeat breeder cows (odds ratio: 3.6). The treatment group and parity showed significant (P < 0.0001) interaction. This interaction suggests that cloprostenol treatment of primiparous cows at insemination might enhance pregnancy yet have no effect in multiparous cows. Our findings indicate that cloprostenol administered at insemination promotes ovulation and double ovulation in lactating dairy cows. Cloprostenol treatment showed no benefit in cows with acceptable reproductive performance, suggesting that cloprostenol treatment at AI may only be useful in cows in which stress factors affect ovulation and in repeat breeder cows.     

Effect of hCG vs. GnRH at the beginning of the Ovsynch on first ovulation and conception rates in cyclic lactating dairy cows

Ovulatory response to the first GnRH of Ovsynch is a very important factor for determining the outcome of a successful synchronization. The aim of the present study was to develop a protocol to increase the percentage of cows that ovulated in response to the first administration of Ovsynch. This study was designed to compare ovulation rates in response to GnRH or hCG at the beginning of Ovsynch and to evaluate the effects of this manipulation on pregnancy. Cows (n = 371) with corpus luteum (CL) and at least one follicle greater than 10 mm diameter size on either ovary were included in the study. Cows were divided into two groups. The Ovsynch protocol began with GnRH (10 μg) in the GPG group (n = 161; GnRH-7d-PGF2α-56h-GnRH-18h-AI), whereas in the HPG group, the first GnRH of the Ovsynch was replaced with 1500 IU hCG (n = 210; hCG-7d-PGF2α-56h-GnRH-18h-AI). Ovarian ultrasonography was performed at the times of GnRH or hCG and of PGF2α administration, at the time of artificial insemination (AI) and seven days after AI, to determine ovulation. Maximal follicle size at the beginning of the Ovsynch did not affect on response to the first GnRH/hCG treatment. Conception rate (31 d) was 0.6 times more likely to be higher (P < 0.001) in cows that responded to the first hormonal administration of Ovsynch than in those that did not respond (95% CI = 0.29-0.71). Conception rate was found to be different between the HPG (37.6%, 79/210) and the GPG groups (48.4%, 78/161). Thus, beginning of the Ovsynch protocol with hCG did not increase ovulation and conception rate in lactating dairy cows, suggesting that hCG is not a suitable replacement of the first GnRH of Ovsynch. However, our results do show that increasing the ovulation rate in response to the first hormonal administration of Ovsynch can have a significant effect on conception rate.     

Factors affecting pregnancy loss for single and twin pregnancies in a high-producing dairy herd

Our objective was to determine the magnitude of, and factors affecting, pregnancy loss for lactating Holstein cows on a commercial dairy farm when diagnosed with twin (n = 98) or single (n = 518) pregnancies using transrectal ultrasonography. Pregnancy losses were assessed with records of non-viable embryos at first pregnancy examination and embryo losses between the first (25-40 d after AI) and second (48 and 82 d after AI) post-breeding pregnancy examinations. Among cows diagnosed with single pregnancies, 3.7% were diagnosed with a non-viable embryo at first pregnancy examination, and 4.6% of those diagnosed with a viable embryo underwent pregnancy loss by the second examination. A total of 11.2% of cows diagnosed with twins experienced a single embryo reduction, whereas 13.3% lost both embryos. Overall, the total proportion of cows experiencing pregnancy loss or experiencing embryo reduction was greater for cows diagnosed with twin than single pregnancies (odds ratio; OR = 3.6), resulting in an embryo survival rate of 91.9% for cows diagnosed with single compared to 75.5% for cows diagnosed with twin pregnancies. Season of breeding and milk production were associated with pregnancy loss for single pregnancies, whereas CL number was associated negatively with embryo reduction and pregnancy loss for twin pregnancies. The risk of twinning and double ovulation among pregnant cows increased with days in milk (DIM), and the risk of double ovulation was greater for cows diagnosed with ovarian cysts and lacking a CL at initiation of an Ovsynch protocol. We concluded that in this herd, embryo reduction and pregnancy loss during early gestation was greater for lactating Holstein cows diagnosed with twin compared to single pregnancies. In addition, cows diagnosed with ovarian cysts and lacking a CL had an increased risk for double ovulation.     

Conception rates and serum progesterone concentration in dairy cattle administered gonadotropin releasing hormone 5 days after artificial insemination

The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of administration of exogenous GnRH 5days after artificial insemination (AI) on ovarian structures, serum progesterone concentration, and conception rates in lactating dairy cows. In experiment 1, 23 Holstein cows were synchronized using the Ovsynch protocol. Five days after AI (day 0) cows were assigned randomly to receive either saline (saline; n=11) or 100microg GnRH (GnRH; n=12). To examine ovarian structures, ultrasonography was performed on day 1 and every other day beginning on day 5 until day 13. On days 5 and 13 blood samples were obtained to measure serum progesterone concentrations. All cows in the GnRH-treated group developed an accessory corpus luteum (CL), whereas cows in the saline group did not. Mean serum progesterone concentrations did not differ between GnRH and saline groups on day 5 (1.64+/-0.46ng/ml versus 2.04+/-0.48ng/ml). On day 13 serum progesterone concentrations were greater (P<0.05) in the GnRH group compared with saline (5.22+/-0.46ng/ml versus 3.36+/-0.48ng/ml). In experiment 2, 542 lactating cows, at two different commercial dairies, were used to test the effect of administering GnRH 5 days after AI on conception rates. Cows were synchronized and detected for estrus according to tail chalk removal. Cows detected in estrus received AI within 1h after detection of estrus. Five days after AI, cows were assigned randomly to receive either GnRH (n=266) or saline (n=276). Pregnancy status was determined by palpation per rectum of uterine contents approximately 40 days after AI. There was no effect of farm on conception rate. There was no effect of treatment as conception rates did not differ between GnRH and saline groups (26.7% GnRH versus 24.3% saline). Regardless of treatment, days in milk, parity, milk yield, and number of services had no effect on the odds ratio of pregnancy. In summary, the results of this study indicated that GnRH administered 5 days after AI increased serum progesterone by developing an accessory CL but did not improve conception rates in dairy cattle.     

Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services

To compare two intervals from the PGF(2alpha) injection to the second GnRH injection+timed artificial insemination (TAI) of Ovsynch, lactating Holstein cows received their first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch (n=352) and second and greater postpartum TAI after resynchronization of ovulation using Ovsynch (Resynch; n=458). Each week, cows housed in each of four breeding pens were randomized by breeding pen to receive the second GnRH injection of Presynch + Ovsynch or Resynch and TAI either 48 h (Cosynch 48; n=382) or 72 h (Cosynch 72; n=428) after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch or Resynch. Overall, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ for cows receiving Cosynch 48 (29%) versus Cosynch 72 (33%). Furthermore, treatment did not affect P/AI for cows receiving first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch, for cows receiving second and greater TAI after Resynch, or the proportion of female calves born. In conclusion, delaying the second GnRH injection and TAI from 48 to 72 h after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch did not affect P/AI or calf sex ratio. The lack of a difference in fertility between these Cosynch protocols may offer more flexibility for implementing a systematic synchronization protocol when a Cosynch strategy is used.     

Strategic treatment of anovular dairy cows with GnRH

The primary objective was to evaluate fertility of anovular dairy cows given GnRH 4 d after first postpartum timed AI (TAI). Secondary objectives were to determine ovulatory response to treatment, effect of treatment on serum progesterone (P(4)) concentrations, and the proportion with a short luteal phase. Lactating Holstein cows (n=1047) were submitted for first postpartum TAI using a Presynch+Ovsynch protocol. Anovular cows were identified from an initial 1047 lactating Holstein cows using transrectal ultrasonography, based on the absence of a CL at the first GnRH injection of a Presynch+Ovsynch protocol, and anovular cows were randomly assigned to receive either no further treatment (Control, n=85), or 100 microg of GnRH 4 d after TAI (GnRH treated; n=71). For GnRH treated cows, 51% responded by ovulating a follicle in response to GnRH treatment 4 d after TAI; however, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ between GnRH treated cows that ovulated (36%) compared to GnRH treated cows that did not ovulate (21%). There was a quadratic effect of P(4) at the PGF(2 alpha) injection of Ovsynch on P/AI, and cows with P(4)>or=1 ng/mL at the PGF(2 alpha) injection of Ovsynch had greater P/AI (41%) than cows with P(4)<1 ng/mL (12%); however, no treatment difference was detected. Overall, P/AI did not differ between control (30.1%) and GnRH treated (29.6%) treatments for synchronized cows. Although treatment of anovular cows with GnRH 4 d after TAI failed to improve fertility, variation among cows in serum P(4) at the PGF(2 alpha) injection of Ovsynch dramatically affected fertility of anovular dairy cows.     

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows I: use of the Ovsynch and Heatsynch protocols after non-pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography

The objective was to compare pregnancy rates and pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows that were diagnosed not pregnant and re-inseminated following either the Ovsynch or Heatsynch protocols. Also evaluated were the effects of stages of the estrous cycle, ovarian cysts and anestrus on pregnancy rates for both treatments. Non-pregnant cows (n = 332) as determined by ultrasonography on day 27 post-AI (study day 0) were divided into two groups. Cows in the Ovsynch group (n = 166) received GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and timed AI (TAI) 16 h later (day 10). Cows in the Heatsynch group (n = 166) received GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, estradiol cypionate (ECP) on day 8, and TAI 48 h later (day 10). Cows detected in estrus on days 8 and 9 were inseminated and included in the study. On day 0, cows were classified according to different stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 27, 45 and 90 days after resynchronized AI. Overall, there was no difference in pregnancy rates on days 27, 45 and 90 between cows in the Ovsynch (25.2, 17.5, and 13.9%) and Heatsynch (25.8, 19.9, and 16.1%) groups. There was no difference in pregnancy losses from days 27 to 45 and days 45 to 90 for cows in the Ovsynch (25.0 and 17.9%) and Heatsynch (14.7 and 10.3%) groups. However, pregnancy rates were increased when cows in metestrus were subjected to the Heatsynch protocol and cows with ovarian cysts were subjected to the Ovsynch protocol.     

Pregnancy rate following GnRH + PGF 2alpha treatment of low body condition, anestrous Bos taurus by Bos indicus crossbred cows during the summer months in a tropical environment

Anestrous and lactating Bos taurus by Bos indicus crossbred cows with minimum body condition were studied to determine the efficacy of GnRH+PGF 2alpha combinations for induction of estrus and/or ovulation on pregnancy rate during the months of the year when temperatures are greater. On day 0 (start of treatment), cows were assigned randomly to either treatment or control groups. Treated cows (n = 74) received i.m. 200 microg of GnRH on day 0 and 150 microg of PGF 2alpha 7 days later (day 7). On day 7, treated cows were equally distributed to each of three protocols: (1) Select Synch (n = 25), artificial insemination (AI) 12 h after exhibiting estrus from day 7 (PGF 2alpha injection) until day 12; (2) Ovsynch (n = 24), 200 microg of GnRH at 48 h after PGF 2alpha (day 9) + timed-AI (TAI) 16-20 h later; (3) CO-Synch (n = 25), 200 microg of GnRH + TAI at 48 h after PGF 2alpha (day 9). Control cows (n = 25) received no treatment + AI 12 h after exhibiting estrus from days 0 to 12. Detection of estrus was performed daily during the early morning and evening hours from days 0 to 7 in all the cows, and from days 7 to 12 in the cows treated with Select Synch and in the control group, with the aid of a sterilized bull. Palpation per rectum and transrectal ultrasonography were used on days -30, -20, -10 and 0 to confirm anestrus (absence of CL and no signs of estrus at each evaluation) but with ovarian follicles > or = 10 mm on day 0. Pregnancy rate was 0% for Select Synch, 21% for Ovsynch and 28% for CO-Synch (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the Ovsynch and CO-Synch protocols resulted in greater pregnancy rates compared with the Select Synch protocol in Bos taurus/Bos indicus cows with minimum body condition that were anestrous and lactating during the summer months in a tropical environment.     

Efficacy of decreasing the dose of GnRH used in a protocol for synchronization of ovulation and timed AI in lactating dairy cows

To determine the efficacy of reducing the dosage of GnRH used in a protocol for synchronization of ovulation and timed AI, primiparous and multiparous lactating Holstein cows (n=237) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ovulation was synchronized for cows in the first group using intramuscular injections of GnRH and PGF₂ as follows: Day 0, 100 μg GnRH; Day 7, 25 mg PGF₂; Day 9, 100 μg GnRH. Ovulation was synchronized in the second group of cows using the same injection schedule and dosage of PGF₂ but only 50 μg GnRH per injection. All cows underwent a timed AI at 12 to 18 h after the second GnRH injection. The proportion of cows ovulating in response to the second GnRH injection (synchronization rate) and pregnancy status at 28 and 56 d post AI were determined using transrectal ultrasonography. The synchronization rate, double-ovulation rate, conception rate at 28 and 56 d post AI, and pregnancy loss from 28 to 56 d post AI did not differ statistically between treatment groups. For all cows, synchronization rate was 84.0%, and double-ovulation rate was 14.1%. Conception rates calculated using all cows receiving synchronization of ovulation were 41.1% at 28 d and 34.4% at 56 d post AI. Conception rates calculated for only synchronized cows were 47.6% at 28 d and 40.1% at 56 d post AI. For all cows, pregnancy loss from 28 to 56 d post AI was 13.5%, with an attrition rate of 0.5% per day. Estimated savings in hormone costs using 50 rather than 100 μg GnRH per injection for synchronizing ovulation were $6.40 per cow and $20.27 per pregnancy. Thus, decreasing the dosage of GnRH used for synchronization of ovulation and timed AI in lactating dairy cows reduces synchronization costs per cow and per pregnancy without compromising the efficacy of the synchronization protocol.     

Luteal activity at the onset of a timed insemination protocol affects reproductive outcome in early postpartum dairy cows

This study was designed to compare two timed insemination protocols, in which progesterone, GnRH and PGF2alpha were combined, with the Ovsynch protocol in presynchronized, early postpartum dairy cows. Reproductive performance was also evaluated according to whether cows showed high or low plasma progesterone concentration, at the onset of treatment. One hundred and six early postpartum dairy cows were presynchronized with two cloprostenol treatments given 14 days apart, and then assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Treatments for the synchronization of estrus in all three groups started 7 days after the second cloprostenol injection, which was considered Day 0 of the actual treatment regime. Cows in the control group (Ovsynch, n=30) were treated with GnRH on Day 0, PGF2alpha on Day 7, and were given a second dose of GnRH 32 h later. Cows in group PRID (n=45) were fitted with a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID) for 9 days, and were given GnRH at the time of PRID insertion and PGF2alpha on Day 7. In group PRID/GnRH (n=31), cows received the same treatment as in the PRID group, but were given an additional GnRH injection 36 h after PRID removal. Cows were inseminated 16-20 h after the administration of the second GnRH dose in the Ovsynch group, and 56 h after PRID removal in the PRID and PRID/GnRH groups. Ovulation rate was determined on Day 11 postinsemination by detecting the presence of a corpus luteum in the ovaries. Lactation number, milk production, body condition at the onset of treatment and treatment regime were included as potential factors influencing ovulation and pregnancy after synchronization. Logistic regression analysis for cows with high and low progesterone concentration on treatment Day 0 revealed that none of the factors included in the models, except the interaction between progesterone and treatment regime, influenced the risk of ovulation and pregnancy significantly. In cows with high progesterone concentration at treatment onset, Ovsynch treatment resulted in a significantly improved pregnancy rate over values obtained following PRID or PRID/GnRH treatment. In cows with low progesterone concentration, PRID or PRID/GnRH treatment led to markedly increased ovulation and pregnancy rates with respect to Ovsynch treatment. These findings suggest the importance of establishing ovarian status in early postpartum dairy cows before starting a timed AI protocol, in terms of luteal activity assessed by blood progesterone.     

Strategies to optimize reproductive efficiency by regulation of ovarian function in yak (Poephagus grunniens L.)

Ovulatory response to the first GnRH of Ovsynch is the critical determinant for successful synchronization of ovulation in animals. An attempt was made in this study to design a pre-Ovsynch hormonal strategy in yaks to increase the ovulatory response to the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch so that overall synchronization rate to Ovsynch could be improved. Non-lactating cyclic yak cows (n=33) were assigned to receive either no treatment before Ovsynch (control) or 0.375 mg of PGF2alpha (PreP) followed 2 d later by 10 microg of GnRH (PreG), administered 4 (G4G), 5 (G5G), or 6 (G6G) d before initiating the Ovsynch protocol. Rectal palpation was performed to assess ovulation and blood samples were collected to measure progesterone concentrations during pre-treatment, treatment and post-treatment periods. All the animals received timed AI 12 and 24h after the final GnRH of Ovsynch. Diagnoses for pregnancy were performed by rectal palpation and profiles of plasma progesterone 35 d after AI. Percentage of yak cows that ovulated in response to the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch, synchronized to Ovsynch treatment, had a functional CL at PGF2alpha of Ovsynch, had circulating concentrations of P4 at PGF2alpha of Ovsynch and likely to be pregnant after 35 d after AI, were greater in G6G and G5G compared with control, whereas G4G did not differ from controls. In addition, animals that ovulated in response to first GnRH of Ovsynch had greater response to PGF2alpha of Ovsynch and greater synchronization rate to the overall protocol than those that did not ovulate. In summary, PGF2alpha-and-GnRH-based pre-Ovsynch strategies consisting of 5 or 6-d interval between PreG and first GnRH of Ovsynch resulted in a greater ovulatory and luteolytic response to first GnRH andPGF2alpha of Ovsynch, respectively, compared with control animals. These, in turn, optimized synchronization rate to Ovsynch in yaks.     

Fertility following fixed-time AI or insemination at observed estrus in Ovsynch and Heatsynch programs in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this study was to compare the conception rate for fixed-timed artificial insemination (FTAI) and observed heat artificial insemination (HAI) prior to the scheduled FTAI in Ovsynch and Heatsynch synchronization protocols. In Experiment 1, lactating dairy cows (n=535) received two set-up injections of 25mg prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) i.m., 14 days apart starting at 36+/-3 days in milk (DIM). Cows were blocked by parity and were randomly allocated to either Ovsynch or Heatsynch groups. All cows received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. 14 days after the second set-up injection of PGF(2alpha), followed by a third injection of 25mg PGF(2alpha) i.m., 7 days later. In the Ovsynch group, HAI cows (n=29) were bred on standing estrus after the third PGF(2alpha) before the scheduled second GnRH, whereas FTAI cows (n=218) that were not observed in estrus, received a second injection of 100 microg of GnRH i.m., 48 h after the third PGF(2alpha) and received TAI 8 h after the second GnRH. In the Heatsynch group, all cows (n=288) received 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) 24 h after third PGF(2alpha) and HAI cows (n=172) were bred on standing estrus and FTAI cows (n=116) that were not observed in estrus, received TAI 72 h after the third PGF(2alpha). In Experiment 2, repeat breeder cows (n=186) were randomly assigned to either Ovsynch or Heatsynch groups. The FTAI and HAI cows were inseminated similar to Experiment 1. All cows were observed for estrus three times daily. The associations with the conception rate were modeled with logistic regression separately for Experiments 1 and 2. Of all the variables included in the model in Experiment 1, type of AI (HAI versus FTAI, P=0.0003) and parity (primiparous versus multiparous, P=0.05) influenced the first service conception rate. Over-all conception rate and first service conception rate for HAI cows were higher compared to FTAI cows (33.8% versus 21.3%, and 35.3% versus 21.0%; P=0.001). In the Heatsynch group, cows that received HAI had significantly higher over-all conception rate and first service conception rate compared to FTAI (35.2% versus 17.3% and 36.0% versus 15.5%; P=0.0001). The conception rates in repeat breeder cows for HAI and FTAI (30.1% versus 22.3%) were not different (P>0.1). In conclusion, it was recommended to include AI at observed estrus and fixed-time AI for cows not observed in estrus in order to improve the conception rate in synchronization protocols.     

Comparison of synchronization of ovulation and induction of estrus as therapeutic strategies for bovine ovarian cysts in the dairy cow

The benefit of using timed-insemination in lactating dairy cows for the treatment of ovarian cysts lies in the fact that cows do not have to be detected in estrus for insemination and achieving pregnancy. We compared the effectiveness of synchronization of ovulation with timed-insemination and induction of estrus with insemination at estrus in the treatment of bovine ovarian cysts in lactating dairy cows. After Day 65 post partum, a total of 368 lactating dairy cows was divided into 3 groups. Cows in Group 1 (n = 209, normal, noncystic) were treated with 100 ug, i.m. GnRH on Day 0; 25 mg, i.m. PGF2 alpha on Day 7; and 100 ug, i.m. GnRH on Day 9 and then were time-inseminated 16 h later. Cows in Group 2 (n = 76, abnormal, cystic) were treated with 100 ug, i.m. GnRH on Day 0; 25 mg, i.m. PGF2 alpha on Day 7; and 100 ug, i.m. GnRH on Day 9 and time-inseminated 16 h later. Cows in Group 3 (n = 83, abnormal, cystic) were treated with 100 ug, i.m. GnRH on Day 0; 25 mg, i.m. PGF2 alpha on Day 7; and inseminated at induced estrus within 7 d after treatment with PGF2 alpha. Day 0 was the day of initiation of the study. Conception and pregnancy rates among groups were compared using logistic regression and adjusted for parity, time of year and days in milk. Conception and pregnancy rates of Group 1 cows (31.5%) were not significantly different from those of Group 2 cows (23.6%). However, the pregnancy rate in normal cows (Group 1) was higher (P < 0.01) than in cystic cows (Groups 2 and 3). Cows in Group 3 had a higher conception rate than cows in Group 2 (51.7% > 23.6%; P < 0.01). However, pregnancy rates for cows in Groups 2 (23.6%) and 3 (18%) were not significantly different. The finding indicated that synchronization of ovulation and timed-insemination resulted in pregnancy rates similar to those of synchronization of estrus and insemination at an induced estrus within 7 d for the treatment of ovarian cysts in lactating dairy cows.     

Managing the dominant follicle in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive efficiency is not optimal in high-producing dairy cows. Although many aspects of ovarian follicular growth in cows are similar to those observed in heifers, there are numerous specific differences in follicular development that may be linked with changes in reproductive physiology in high-producing lactating dairy cows. These include: 1) reduced circulating estradiol (E2) concentrations near estrus, 2) ovulation of follicles that are larger than the optimal size, 3) increased double ovulation and twinning, and 4) increased incidence of anovulation with a distinctive pattern of follicle growth in anovular dairy cows. The first three changes become more dramatic as milk production increases, although anovulation has not generally been associated with level of milk production. To overcome reproductive inefficiencies in dairy cows, reproductive management programs have been developed to synchronize ovulation and enable the use of timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Effective regulation of the CL, follicles, and hormonal environment during each part of the protocol is critical for optimizing these programs. This review discusses the distinct aspects of follicular development in lactating dairy cows and the methodologies that have been utilized in the past two decades in order to manage the dominant follicle during synchronization of ovulation and timed AI programs.     

Managing the dominant follicle in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive efficiency is not optimal in high-producing dairy cows. Although many aspects of ovarian follicular growth in cows are similar to those observed in heifers, there are numerous specific differences in follicular development that may be linked with changes in reproductive physiology in high-producing lactating dairy cows. These include: 1) reduced circulating estradiol (E2) concentrations near estrus, 2) ovulation of follicles that are larger than the optimal size, 3) increased double ovulation and twinning, and 4) increased incidence of anovulation with a distinctive pattern of follicle growth in anovular dairy cows. The first three changes become more dramatic as milk production increases, although anovulation has not generally been associated with level of milk production. To overcome reproductive inefficiencies in dairy cows, reproductive management programs have been developed to synchronize ovulation and enable the use of timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Effective regulation of the CL, follicles, and hormonal environment during each part of the protocol is critical for optimizing these programs. This review discusses the distinct aspects of follicular development in lactating dairy cows and the methodologies that have been utilized in the past two decades in order to manage the dominant follicle during synchronization of ovulation and timed AI programs.