The Use of the Vibration Signal and Worker Piping to Influence Queen Behavior during Swarming in Honey Bees, Apis mellifera

We investigated worker regulation of queen activity during reproductive swarming by examining the rates at which workers performed vibration signals and piping on queens during the different stages of the swarming process. Worker–queen interactions were first examined inside observation hives during the 2–3 wk that preceded the issue of the swarm (pre‐swarming period) and then inside the swarm clusters during the period that preceded liftoff and relocation to a new nest site (post‐swarming period). Queen court size did not differ between the pre‐ and post‐swarming periods, but workers fed the queens less inside the swarm clusters. Workers performed vibration signals on the queens at increasing rates throughout the pre‐swarming period inside the natal nest, but rarely or never vibrated the queen inside the swarm. Piping was performed on the queens during both the pre‐ and post‐swarming periods and always reached a peak immediately before queen flight. During the final 2–4 h before swarm liftoff, queens were increasingly contacted by waggle dancers for nest sites, some of which piped the queen. The vibration signal may operate in a modulatory manner to gradually prepare the queen for flight from the natal nest, and the cumulative effects of the signal during the pre‐swarming period may make further vibrations on the queen unnecessary when inside the swarm cluster. In contrast, worker piping may function in a more immediate manner to trigger queen takeoff during both the pre‐ and post‐swarming periods. Workers that vibrate and pipe the queen tend to be older, foraging‐age bees. The regulation of queen activity during colony reproduction may therefore be controlled largely by workers that normally have little contact with queens, but help to formulate colony reproductive and movement decisions.     

Nest‐Site Defense by Competing Honey Bee Swarms During House‐Hunting

Cavity‐nesting animals must often defend their homes against intruders, especially when the availability of suitable cavities is limited. Competition for nest sites is particularly strong when multiple groups of the same species migrate synchronously to found a new home. This may be the case for honey bees during the reproductive season, because neighboring colonies often cast swarms simultaneously, leading to potential competition for high‐quality nesting cavities. To test the idea that honey bee swarms may compete for and defend potential nest sites as they search for a new home, we observed pairs of artificial swarms that were house‐hunting concurrently. Workers from one swarm in each pair carried a gene influencing body color, so that the bees from the two swarms were easily distinguished. We set up a high‐quality nest box and waited for nest‐site scouts from each swarm to explore and recruit swarm mates to it. We recorded all the interactions between competing scouts at the nest box and found that when scouts from both swarms explored the box simultaneously they behaved agonistically toward bees from the other swarm. The level of aggression depended on the number of scouts from each swarm present at the nest box. When only one to three scouts from each swarm were at the box, they rarely fought. But when the scouts from one swarm outnumbered those from the other swarm (4–20 vs. one to three bees), those in the majority advertised their presence with a buzzing behavior at the entrance opening, and started mobbing and killing those in the minority. When one swarm gained clear control of the nest box (20+ vs. zero to one bees), some of its scouts guarded the box’s entrance, preventing entry by foreign scouts. Our study exemplifies how cavity‐nesting animals may compete for and defend suitable nesting sites.     

The Role of the Vibration Signal during Nest‐Site Selection by Honey Bee Swarms

The vibration signal may influence nest‐site selection by honey bee swarms by enhancing scouting and recruitment. We investigated this hypothesis by comparing (1) the number of nest sites and the distances communicated by nest‐site dancers on swarms from which vibrators were and were not removed and (2) the behavior of scouts visiting higher‐quality (HQ) and lower‐quality (LQ) nest boxes. The removal of vibrators from swarms did not alter the number of nest sites investigated, the distances traveled to nest sites, or the time required to select a new nest cavity. In contrast, vibrator removal tripled the time required for swarms to achieve liftoff after a cavity had been selected, although all swarm eventually became airborne and moved to a new site. About 14% of the scouts that visited the HQ and LQ nest boxes performed vibration signals; however, nest‐box quality did not influence the tendency to produce the signal or intermix vibration signals and recruitment dances. However, we did find a significant, positive correlation between overall levels of vibration signal activity and nest‐site recruitment during the house‐hunting process. When viewed in concert, our results suggest that the vibration signal contributes to the house‐hunting process by operating in a non‐specific manner that may enhance scouting and recruitment in general during nest‐site selection and facilitate rapid swarm liftoff after a new nest site has been chosen. The vibration signal is therefore a component in the cascade of communication signals that orchestrate house‐hunting and colony relocation decisions.     

Self-assemblage formation in a social insect: the protective curtain of a honey bee swarm

Summary. This paper considers a little-studied topic in the biology of social insects: the formation of self-assemblages. It focuses on the mechanisms whereby the outermost workers in a bivouacked swarm of honey bees, when rained upon, form a water repellent curtain of bees over the swarm cluster. Specifically, we analyzed how the worker bees in the mantle of a swarm cluster adjust their body orientation, wing spread, and inter-individual spacing to form a protective curtain when wetted. When warm and dry, the mantle bees orient their bodies weakly with respect to gravity, do not tuck their heads under adjacent bees, have high variability in wing spread, and space themselves widely. In contrast, when warm and wet, the mantle bees orient uniformly with head upward, tuck their heads beneath the abdomens of bees above, hold their wings together, and press tightly together. This produces a surface that closely resembles a tiled roof. When cool and dry, the mantle bees generally orient their bodies with head upward, press their heads into the interior of the cluster, hold their wings wide apart, and draw close together. We also examined the age distribution of the mantle bees. Older bees are more likely than younger bees to be found in the mantle of a swarm, perhaps because younger bees are more important than older bees to colony survival after swarming and so occupy a more sheltered position in a swarm. Finally, we tested whether swarm clusters that have formed a protective curtain shed water more effectively than ones that have not formed a curtain. We found that this is the case.Received 28 November 2003; revised 29 February 2004; accepted 11 April 2004.     

Vibration Signal Behavior of Waggle-dancers in Swarms of the Honey Bee,Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

We hypothesize two functions of the vibration signal (dorsal ventral abdominal vibration = DVAV) during swarming in honey bees: 1. it enhances recruitment to the specific sites advertised by the waggle dancers which also perform the vibration signal; and 2. it acts as a nonspecific modulatory signal to stimulate activity in other bees. The stimulation of activity invoked by the second hypothesis might include increasing nest-site scouting and dance following early in the house-hunting process or rousing quiescent bees to prepare them for lift-off late in the process, or both. In studies of neotropical African bee swarms in Costa Rica and European bees in California we tested these hypotheses by looking for associations between production of vibration signals by nest-site recruiters and site attractiveness (indicated by which site was ultimately chosen and by distance from the swarm since swarms may have a distance preference). Overall, bees dancing for the chosen sites performed vibration signals to the same extent as those dancing for the other sites. There were no distance differences between sites whose scouts did and did not vibrate other bees. These results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that the vibration signal enhances recruitment to especially high quality sites and they support the hypothesis that it plays a general excitatory role in the context of house hunting by swarming bees.     

Stop-Signaling Reduces Split Decisions without Impairing Accuracy in the Honeybee Nest-Site Selection Process

In the honeybee swarm nest-site selection process, individual bees gather information about available candidate sites and communicate the information to other bees. The swarm makes an agreement for a candidate site when the number of bees that supports the site reaches a threshold. This threshold is usually referred to as the quorum threshold and it is shown by many studies as a key parameter that is a compromise between the accuracy and speed of decisions. In the present work, we use a model of the honeybee Apis mellifera nest-site selection process to study how the quorum threshold and discovery time of candidate sites have major impact on two unfavorable situations in selecting a nest site: decision deadlock and decision split. We show that cross-inhibitory stop-signaling, delivered among bees supporting different sites, enables swarms to avoid the decision split problem in addition to avoiding the decision deadlock problem that has been previously proposed. We also show that stop-signaling improves decision speed, but compromises decision accuracy in swarms using high quorum thresholds by causing the swarms to be trapped in local optima (e.g., choosing a sub-optimal option that is encountered first). On the other hand, we demonstrate that stop-signaling can reduce split decisions without compromising decision accuracy in swarms using low quorum thresholds when it is compared to the accuracy of swarms using the same threshold values but not exhibiting stop-signaling. Based on our simulations, we suggest that swarms using low quorum thresholds (as well as swarms with large population sizes) would benefit more from exhibiting the stop-signaling activity than not exhibiting it.     

An information-theory analysis of task specialization among worker honey bees performing hive duties

Worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) performing field duties are known to possess individual task specializations. However, little evidence has been forthcoming about individual specializations among the younger pre-foraging worker bees performing hive duties. This paper reports results obtained from behavioural observations of worker bees in seven hives. An information-theory analysis of these data reveals that the divergence from independence (D₂) of worker bee identity and behavioural pattern performed has a low value in all of the experimental hives. Young worker bees performing hive duties therefore do not possess detectable individual specializations. Environmental and life-history considerations that may account for this difference in behaviour between field and hive worker bees are discussed.     

Searching for a new home--scouting behavior of honeybee swarms

Honeybee scouting, where individual bees search the environmentwithout prior information about the possible location of foodsources or nest sites, is notoriously difficult to study. Yet,understanding scouting behavior is important as it providesinsights into how social insects trade-off exploitation withexploration. The use of simulation models is an ideal way toinvestigate the possible mechanisms behind the regulation ofscouting at the group level as well as the ways in which theswarm searches its environment. We used an individual-basedsimulation model to study the scouting behavior of honeybeeswarms. In our model, we implemented a simple decision rulethat regulates the number of scouts: individual bees first attemptto find a dance to follow but become scouts if they fail todo so. We show that this rule neatly allows the swarm to adjustthe number of scouts depending on the quality of the nest sitesknown to the swarm. We further explored different search strategiesthat allow the swarm to select good-quality nest sites independentof their distance from the swarm. Assuming that it is costlyto move to a site that is far away, the best search strategywould be to give precedence to nearby sites while still allowingthe discovery of better sites at distances farther away.     

Age and rearing environment interact in the retention of early olfactory memories in honeybees

Due to the changing behavioral contexts at which social insects are exposed during the adult lifespan, they are ideal models to analyze the effect of particular sensory stimuli during young adulthood on later behavior. Specifically, our goal is to understand early influences on later foraging behavior. For that, olfactory memories were established by worker honeybees to different pre-foraging ages using either (1) classical conditioning in the proboscis extension response (PER) paradigm or (2) the offering of scented-sugar solution under different rearing conditions. By testing long-term memories (LTM) through a single PER test in workers of foraging ages (17-25 days), we found that retention of the early olfactory memories in honey bees is age-dependent and not time-dependent. Independently of the environmental conditions in which they were reared (laboratory cages or hives), bees were able to retain food-odor association from 5 days after emergence, but rarely before. In most experiments we observed a bi-modal pattern of response: bees exposed to scented-food at 5-8 and 13-16 days showed better retention than those exposed at 9-12 days. These differences disappeared for bees reared in hives. Retrieval of LTMs depending on the timing and the continuous inputs of appropriate sensory stimuli are discussed.     

A new threat to honey bees, the parasitic phorid fly Apocephalus borealis

Honey bee colonies are subject to numerous pathogens and parasites. Interaction among multiple pathogens and parasites is the proposed cause for Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), a syndrome characterized by worker bees abandoning their hive. Here we provide the first documentation that the phorid fly Apocephalus borealis, previously known to parasitize bumble bees, also infects and eventually kills honey bees and may pose an emerging threat to North American apiculture. Parasitized honey bees show hive abandonment behavior, leaving their hives at night and dying shortly thereafter. On average, seven days later up to 13 phorid larvae emerge from each dead bee and pupate away from the bee. Using DNA barcoding, we confirmed that phorids that emerged from honey bees and bumble bees were the same species. Microarray analyses of honey bees from infected hives revealed that these bees are often infected with deformed wing virus and Nosema ceranae. Larvae and adult phorids also tested positive for these pathogens, implicating the fly as a potential vector or reservoir of these honey bee pathogens. Phorid parasitism may affect hive viability since 77% of sites sampled in the San Francisco Bay Area were infected by the fly and microarray analyses detected phorids in commercial hives in South Dakota and California's Central Valley. Understanding details of phorid infection may shed light on similar hive abandonment behaviors seen in CCD.     

Worker piping triggers hissing for coordinated colony defence in the dwarf honeybee Apis florea

Defending a large social insect colony containing several thousands of workers requires the simultaneous action of many individuals. Ideally this action involves communication between the workers, enabling coordinated action and a fast response. The Asian dwarf honeybee, Apis florea, is a small honeybee with an open nesting habit and a comparatively small colony size, features that leave them particularly exposed to predators. We describe here a novel defence response of these bees in which the emission of an initial warning signal from one individual ("piping") is followed 0.3 to 0.7 seconds later by a general response from a large number of bees ("hissing"). Piping is audible to the human ear, with a fundamental frequency of 384 +/- 31Hz and lasting for 0.82 +/- 0.35 seconds. Hissing is a broad band, noisy signal, clearly audible to the human observer and produced by slight but visible movements of the bees' wings. Hissing begins in individuals close to the piping bee, spreads rapidly to neighbours and results in an impressive coordinated crescendo occasionally involving the entire colony. Piping and hissing are accompanied by a marked decrease, or even cessation, of worker activities such as forager dancing and departures from the colony. We show that whereas hissing of the colony can be elicited without piping, the sequential and correlated piping and hissing response is specific to the presence of potential predators close to the colony. We suggest that the combined audio-visual effect of the hissing might deter small predators, while the cessation of flight activity could decrease the risk of predation by birds and insects which prey selectively on flying bees.     

A Mathematical Model for Flight Guidance in Honeybee Swarms

When a colony of honeybees relocates to a new nest site, less than 5?% of the bees (the scout bees) know the location of the new nest. Nevertheless, the small minority of informed bees manages to provide guidance to the rest and the entire swarm is able to fly to the new nest intact. The streaker bee hypothesis, one of the several theories proposed to explain the guidance mechanism in bee swarms, seems to be supported by recent experimental observations. The theory suggests that the informed bees make high-speed flights through the swarm in the direction of the new nest, hence conspicuously pointing to the desired direction of travel. This work presents a mathematical model of flight guidance in bee swarms based on the streaker bee hypothesis. Numerical experiments, parameter studies, and comparison with experimental data are presented.     

Quantification and distribution of a Tetragonula carbonaria swarm (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Manual mark-by-mark image analysis was used to quantify the number of individuals present in a Tetragonula carbonaria swarm. A total of 7328 bees were identified in the swarm. The distribution of individuals within the swarm followed a Gaussian distribution, with the distances to the nearest neighbour strongly positively skewed. The clustering of bees in the centre of the swarm is likely a mechanism for reducing predation risk. In the case of male mating swarms, large aggregations may increase the mating success of the species.     

Quantifying honey bee mating range and isolation in semi-isolated valleys by DNA microsatellite paternity analysis

Honey bee males and queens mate in mid air and can fly many kilometres on their nuptial flights. The conservation of native honey bees, such as the European black bee (Apis mellifera mellifera), therefore, requires large isolated areas to prevent hybridisation with other subspecies, such as A. m. ligustica or A. m. carnica, which may have been introduced by beekeepers. This study used DNA microsatellite markers to determine the mating range of A. m. mellifera in two adjacent semi-isolated valleys (Edale and Hope Valley) in the Peak District National Park, England, in order to assess their suitability for native honey bee conservation and as isolated mating locations. Three apiaries were set up in each valley, each containing 12 colonies headed by a virgin queen and 2 queenright drone producing hives. The virgin queens were allowed to mate naturally with drones from the hives we had set up and with drones from hives owned by local beekeepers. After mating, samples of worker larvae were taken from the 41 queens that mated successfully and genotyped at 11 DNA microsatellite loci. Paternity analyses were then carried out to determine mating distances and isolation. An average of 10.2 fathers were detected among the 16 worker progeny. After correction for non-detection and non-sampling errors, the mean effective mating frequency of the test queens was estimated to be 17.2, which is a normal figure for honey bees. Ninety percent of the matings occurred within a distance of 7.5 km, and fifty percent within 2.5 km. The maximal mating distance recorded was 15 km. Queens and drones did occasionally mate across the borders between the two valleys, showing that the dividing mountain ridge Losehill does not provide complete isolation. Nevertheless, in the most isolated part of Edale sixty percent of all matings were to drones from Edale hives. The large majority of observed mating distances fell within the range of Hope Valley, making this site a suitable location for the long term conservation of a breeding population of black bees.     

Optimal colony fissioning in social insects: testing an inclusive fitness model with honey bees

In most species of social insects, when a queen departs from her parental nest to found a new colony, she leaves on her own. In some species, however, the departing queen leaves accompanied by a portion of the parental colony’s workers and there is a permanent fissioning of the worker force. Little is known about how the adult workers in colonies of fissioning species distribute themselves between the old and the new colonies. We examined this problem, building on Bulmer’s (J Theor Biol 100: 329–339, 1983) model for the optimal splitting of a colony’s adult workforce during colony reproduction. We first created an inclusive fitness model of optimal colony fissioning that applies to species in which fissioning gives rise to two autonomous colonies. The model predicts the optimal “swarm fraction”, which we define as the proportion of the adult workers in a fissioning colony that join the departing queen. We then tested the model by comparing the predicted and observed swarm fractions in honey bees. We found a close match between predicted (0.76–0.77) and observed (0.72 ± 0.04) swarm fractions. Evidently, worker honey bees distribute themselves between the old and new colonies in a way that jointly maximizes the inclusive fitness of each worker. We conclude by discussing additional ways to test the model.     

Orientation of comb building by honeybees

Summary Upon entering a new home site a honeybee swarm is faced with the task of organizing the building activities of thousands of component bees so that several straight and parallel vertically oriented combs can be quickly and efficiently built. As a part of this organization process it is necessary for the bees to select and agree upon a planar orientation for the new combs.This paper presents evidence that memory of a previously used comb direction influences the building of the new set of combs. Swarms which have recently moved into bait-hives (empty boxes placed in trees to attract feral swarms) tend to maintain the previously used comb direction when removed and forced to build new combs, whereas swarms which have occupied the bait-hives for a longer period (over 9 days) do not.Recent swarms predictably alter their comb building direction within the influence of an applied earthstrength magnetic field, indicating that honey bees are able to use the earth's magnetic field as a reference at the commencement of comb construction in a new hive.     

Competition between honey bees and wild bees and the role of nesting resources in a nature reserve

The European honey bee exploits floral resources efficiently and may therefore compete with solitary wild bees. Hence, conservationists and bee keepers are debating about the consequences of beekeeping for the conservation of wild bees in nature reserves. We observed flower-visiting bees on flowers of Calluna vulgaris in sites differing in the distance to the next honey-bee hive and in sites with hives present and absent in the Lüneburger Heath, Germany. Additionally, we counted wild bee ground nests in sites that differ in their distance to the next hive and wild bee stem nests and stem-nesting bee species in sites with hives present and absent. We did not observe fewer honey bees or higher wild bee flower visits in sites with different distances to the next hive (up to 1,229 m). However, wild bees visited fewer flowers and honey bee visits increased in sites containing honey-bee hives and in sites containing honey-bee hives we found fewer stem-nesting bee species. The reproductive success, measured as number of nests, was not affected by distance to honey-bee hives or their presence but by availability and characteristics of nesting resources. Our results suggest that beekeeping in the Lüneburg Heath can affect the conservation of stem-nesting bee species richness but not the overall reproduction either of stem-nesting or of ground-nesting bees. Future experiments need control sites with larger distances than 500 m to hives. Until more information is available, conservation efforts should forgo to enhance honey bee stocking rates but enhance the availability of nesting resources.     

Hemolymph juvenile hormone titers in worker honey bees under normal and preswarming conditions

Swarming is an important mechanism by which honey bee, Apis mellifera L., colonies reproduce, yet very little is known about the physiological changes in workers that are preparing to swarm. In this study, we determined the endocrine status of worker honey bees in preswarming colonies and in normal (nonswarming) colonies. Juvenile hormone (JH) titers in worker bees were similar in both groups before queen cells were present, but they became significantly lower in preswarming colonies compared with normal colonies when queen cells occurred in preswarming colonies. The lower JH titers in the preswarming colonies suggest that behavioral development is delayed in these colonies, consistent with previous reports that preswarming colonies have reduced foraging activities. Understanding the endocrine status of bees preparing for swarming will help us to better understand the biology of swarming.     

Relatedness and dispersal distance of eusocial bee males on mating swarms

Stingless bee males (Hymenoptera: Apidae) aggregate themselves for reproductive purposes. The knowledge of relatedness among the males attending the aggregations and the distance that they disperse from their natal nests to aggregations may provide important data to effectively conserve these bees. Here, we estimated these properties for Tetragonisca angustula (Latreille, 1811) males. Microsatellite molecular markers were used to genotype bees sampled from local nests and in mating swarms in order to identify the nests of origin of males and maternal genotypes of concerning queens. The distances from assigned nests to the mating swarms allowed us to estimate the distances travelled by males. A genetic relationship analysis was conducted to verify whether T. angustula males were closely related to nests where they aggregated. A pairwise relatedness analysis was also performed among all T. angustula males in each mating swarm. Our results demonstrated that T. angustula mating swarms received dozens to hundreds of males from several colonies (up to 70). Only two of the five mating swarms contained any males that were closely related to the bees from the new nests in construction. The relatedness among males was also extremely low. Yet, dispersal distance of T. angustula males ranged hundreds of meters up to 1.6 km, with evidence of reaching 2.25 km according to their flight radius obtained from their foraging area for locality. These data indicate a highly efficient mating system with minimal inbreeding in this bee species, with a great dispersal capability not previously found for stingless bee males.     

The Sound and the Fury—Bees Hiss when Expecting Danger

Honey bees are important model systems for the investigation of learning and memory and for a better understanding of the neuronal basics of brain function. Honey bees also possess a rich repertoire of tones and sounds, from queen piping and quacking to worker hissing and buzzing. In this study, we tested whether the worker bees’ sounds can be used as a measure of learning. We therefore conditioned honey bees aversively to odours in a walking arena and recorded both their sound production and their movement. Bees were presented with two odours, one of which was paired with an electric shock. Initially, the bees did not produce any sound upon odour presentation, but responded to the electric shock with a strong hissing response. After learning, many bees hissed at the presentation of the learned odour, while fewer bees hissed upon presentation of another odour. We also found that hissing and movement away from the conditioned odour are independent behaviours that can co-occur but do not necessarily do so. Our data suggest that hissing can be used as a readout for learning after olfactory conditioning, but that there are large individual differences between bees concerning their hissing reaction. The basis for this variability and the possible ecological relevance of the bees’ hissing remain to be investigated.