Thein vivo pattern of firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants

Expression of the firefly luciferase gene in transgenic plants produces light emission patterns when the plants are supplied with luciferin. We explored whether inin vivo pattern of light emission truly reveals the pattern of luciferase gene expression or whether it reflects other parameters such as the availability of the substrate, luciferin, or the tissue-specific distribution of organelles in which luciferase was localized. The tissue-specific distribution of luciferase activity and thein vivo pattern of light were examined when the luciferase gene was driven by different promoters and when luciferase was redirected from the peroxisome, where it is normally targeted, to the chloroplast compartment. It was found that the distribution of luciferase activity closely correlated with the tissue-specific pattern of luciferase mRNA. However, thein vivo light pattern appeared to reflect not only tissue-specific distribution of luciferase activity, but also the pattern of luciferin uptake.     

Bacterial and firefly luciferase genes in transgenic plants: Advantages and disadvantages of a reporter gene

Genes encoding light-emitting luciferase were recently isolated from luminous marine bacteria and fireflies. Expression of luciferase genes in diverse organisms is a unique way for studying gene expression by simple and sensitive measurement of light. Recent advances in application of luciferase reporter genes are reviewed and documented by examples of in vivo visualization of their expression in transgenic plants.     

Monitoring of spatial expression of firefly luciferase in transformed zebrafish

The firefly luciferase gene attached to the cytomegalovirus promoter was transferred into zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) by microinjection of fertilized eggs. Light emission could be monitored in vivo in eggs and throughout the early development of the fish by low-light video-image analysis. Gene expression was transient in most of the cases lasting for about 2 weeks. This gene cassette proved to be a very convenient and nondestructive transformation marker and the firefly luciferase gene appears to be a powerful tool for real-time imaging of tissue-specific gene expression in transgenic fish.     

Secretion of firefly luciferase in E.coli

Summary A DNA segment carrying the full-length, intronless firefly luciferase gene was inserted into the high expression secretion vector, pIN-III -ompA. Upon induction of gene expression, luciferase activity was detected in extracts prepared from periplasmic fractions. The results indicated that the OmpA signal peptide was able to direct secretion of firefly luciferase across the cytoplasmic membrane. This has important implications for using this luciferase as a reporter in studying protein export and targeting.     

A cysteine-free firefly luciferase retains luminescence activity

A mutant of Photinus pyralis luciferase in which all four native cysteine residues are converted to serines retains about 10% of wild-type activity. This mutant should prove useful as a starting point for the introduction of biophysical probes of conformational changes associated with enzyme function. The activities of the cysteine-free mutant and others in which two or three cysteines are converted to serines suggest, however, that small chemical changes can have substantial and interdependent effects on bioluminescence. The introduction of probes should therefore be approached cautiously.     

A convenient affinity chromatography-based purification of firefly luciferase

A method is described for purifying luciferase from firefly lanterns in very good yield. The enzyme was extracted from Photinus lanterns, dialyzed, and further purified by affinity chromatography with 6-aminohexanoic acid-Sepharose 4b benzylamine. Fractions containing luciferase activity were pooled, concentrated by ultrafiltration, and crystallized by dialysis against a low-ionic-strength buffer. The crystalline enzyme appears to be homogeneous by sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis. The entire protocol described was conveniently performed in less than 3 days and yielded 6.2 mg of enzyme from 2.2 g of firefly lanterns. Furthermore, the affinity column employed can be reused at least five times without appreciable loss of binding capacity. Luciferase was chromatographed with several other affinity gels and the results are compared. It appears that 6-aminohexanoic acid-Sepharose 4b benzylamine does not function as a true bioaffinity gel, but rather as a hydrophobic interaction support.     

Bacterial luciferase as a reporter of circadian gene expression in cyanobacteria.

To allow continuous monitoring of the circadian clock in cyanobacteria, we previously created a reporter strain (AMC149) of Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 in which the promoter of the psbAI gene was fused to Vibrio harveyi luciferase structural genes (luxAB) and integrated into the chromosome. Northern (RNA) hybridization and immunoblot analyses were performed to examine changes in abundance of the luxAB mRNA, the native psbAI mRNA, and the luciferase protein to determine whether bioluminescence is an accurate reporter of psbAI promoter activity in AMC149. Under constant light conditions, the mRNA abundances of both luxAB and psbAI oscillated with a period of approximately 24 h for at least 2 days. The expression of these two genes following the same pattern: both mRNAs peaked in the subjective morning, and their troughs occurred near the end of the subjective night. The amount of luciferase protein also oscillated with a period of approximately 24 h, and the protein rhythm is in phase with the bioluminescence rhythm. The rhythm of the luciferase mRNA phase-leads the rhythms of luciferase protein and in vivo bioluminescence by several hours. Comparable results were obtained with a short-period mutant of AMC149. Together, these results indicate that the bioluminescence rhythm in AMC149 is due primarily to circadian oscillation of psbAI promoter activity in this cyanobacterium.     

Gaussia luciferase for bioluminescence tumor monitoring in comparison with firefly luciferase

Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) is a secreted reporter, and its expression in living animals can be assessed by in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) or blood assays. We characterized Gluc as an in vivo reporter in comparison with firefly luciferase (Fluc). Mice were inoculated subcutaneously with tumor cells expressing both Fluc and Gluc and underwent Fluc BLI, Gluc BLI, blood assays of Gluc activity, and caliper measurement. In Gluc BLI, the signal from the tumor peaked immediately and then decreased rapidly. In the longitudinal monitoring, all measures indicated an increase in tumor burden early after cell inoculation. However, the increase reached plateaus in Gluc BLI and Fluc BLI despite a continuous increase in the caliper measurement and Gluc blood assay. Significant correlations were found between the measures, and the correlation between the blood signal and caliper volume was especially high. Gluc allows tumor monitoring in mice and should be applicable to dual-reporter assessment in combination with Fluc. The Gluc blood assay appears to provide a reliable indicator of viable tumor burden, and the combination of a blood assay and in vivo BLI using Gluc should be promising for quantifying and localizing the tumors.     

Model of the active site of firefly luciferase.

A model for the spatial structure of firefly luciferase--ATP--luciferin complex is suggested using the coordinates of unliganded luciferase and the enzyme--substrate complex of the adenylating subunit of gramicidin S synthetase known from the literature. Conformational changes in luciferase can occur during substrate binding resulting in a relative orientation of two luciferase domains similar to that in case of the AMP--phenylalanine--synthetase complex. The model is consistent with data on the physicochemical properties of firefly luciferase and its complexes with the substrates.     

Synthesis of dinucleoside polyphosphates catalyzed by firefly luciferase.

In the presence of ATP, luciferin (LH2), Mg2+ and pyrophosphatase, the firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase synthesizes diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphate (Ap4A) through formation of the E-LH2-AMP complex and transfer of AMP to ATP. The maximum rate of the synthesis is observed at pH 5.7. The Km values for luciferin and ATP are 2-3 microM and 4 mM, respectively. The synthesis is strictly dependent upon luciferin and a divalent metal cation. Mg2+ can be substituted with Zn2+, Co2+ or Mn2+, which are about half as active as Mg2+, as well as with Ni2+, Cd2+ or Ca2+, which, at 5 mM concentration, are 12-20-fold less effective than Mg2+. ATP is the best substrate of the above reaction, but it can be substituted with adenosine 5'-tetraphosphate (p4A), dATP, and GTP, and thus the luciferase synthesizes the corresponding homo-dinucleoside polyphosphates:diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P5-pentaphosphate (Ap5A), dideoxyadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphate (dAp4dA) and diguanosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphate (Gp4G). In standard reaction mixtures containing ATP and a different nucleotide (p4A, dATP, adenosine 5'-[alpha,beta-methylene]-triphosphate, (Ap[CH2]pp), (S')-adenosine-5'-[alpha-thio]triphosphate [Sp)ATP[alpha S]) and GTP], luciferase synthesizes, in addition to Ap4A, the corresponding hetero-dinucleoside polyphosphates, Ap5A, adenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphodeoxyadenosine (Ap4dA), diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-[alpha,beta-methylene] tetraphosphate (Ap[CH2]pppA), (Sp-diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-[alpha-thio]tetraphosphate [Sp)Ap4A[alpha S]) and adenosine-5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphoguanosine (Ap4G), respectively. Adenine nucleotides, with at least a 3-phosphate chain and with an intact alpha-phosphate, are the preferred substrates for the formation of the enzyme-nucleotidyl complex. Nucleotides best accepting AMP from the E-LH2-AMP complex are those which contain at least a 3-phosphate chain and an intact terminal pyrophosphate moiety. ADP or other NDP are poor adenylate acceptors as very little diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P3-triphosphate (Ap3A) or adenosine-5',5"'-P1,P3-triphosphonucleosides (Ap3N) are formed. In the presence of NTP (excepting ATP), luciferase is able to split Ap4A, transferring the resulting adenylate to NTP, to form hetero-dinucleoside polyphosphates. In the presence of PPi, luciferase is also able to split Ap4A, yielding ATP. The cleavage of Ap4A in the presence of Pi or ADP takes place at a very low rate. The synthesis of dinucleoside polyphosphates, catalyzed by firefly luciferase, is compared with that catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and Ap4A phosphorylase.     

Enhancement of firefly luciferase activity by cytidine nucleotides.

The temporal pattern of light production by firefly luciferase depends on the ATP concentration. With low concentrations of ATP a constant production of light occurred while at high concentrations of ATP (greater than 10 microM) there was a flash of light followed by a decline in light production. This time course of light production with high ATP concentrations was changed from the flash pattern to a pattern with a constant production of light by several cytidine nucleotides. CTP, CDP, dCTP, dCDP, dideoxyCTP, periodate-oxidized CTP and CDP, and the etheno derivatives of CTP and CDP produced that change. CMP, cytidine, CDP-glycerol, CDP-glucose, CDP-ethanolamine, and benzoylbenzoylCTP either were inhibitory to firefly luciferase or were not effective in changing the flash time course. Coenzyme A and related compounds also changed the time course of light production. The changes in time course produced by either cytidine nucleotides or CoA were inhibited by desulfoCoA. These compounds apparently enhanced light production by promoting the dissociation of the inhibitory product, oxidized luciferin, from the enzyme. When the activating compounds were used with high concentrations of ATP, the sensitivity of assay for firefly luciferase was increased. This increased sensitivity is important when using the firefly luciferase gene as a reporter.     

The effect of detergents on firefly luciferase reactions

The reaction rate of ATP-limited firefly luciferase-catalysed reactions, is affected by the presence of detergents. Anionic detergents inhibit luciferase activity without causing significant enzyme inactivation during the reaction. Cationic detergents increase reaction rate several-fold with a sharply defined optimum concentration of detergent for the effect. However, cationic detergents inactivate firefly luciferase during the reaction, resulting in a continuously decreasing reaction rate. Under such conditions, peak light intensity must be used as an indication of initial reaction rate. The inactivation rate increases with increasing detergent concentration. Non-ionic and zwitterionic detergents increase reaction rate over a broad range of detergent concentrations. Enzyme stability during the reaction is not affected by non-ionic detergents and only affected by zwitterionic detergents at high detergent concentration. Cyclodextrins, which can increase reaction rates of some chemiluminescent reactions, have little effect on firefly luciferase activity. Assays for ATP using firefly luciferase must be internally standardized by the constant addition technique in which a known amount of ATP is added to the test sample, since external calibration of such assays, by reference to a previously prepared standard curve, can lead to imprecision when detergents are present.     

Refolding of firefly luciferase immobilized on agarose beads

The renaturation yield of the denatured firefly luciferase decreased strongly with increasing protein concentration in a renaturation buffer, because of aggregation. In this study, firefly luciferase was immobilized on agarose beads at a high concentration. Although the protein concentration was extremely high (about 100-fold) compared to that of soluble luciferase, the renaturation yield was comparable with that for the soluble one. Thus, immobilization was shown to be effective for avoiding aggregation of firefly luciferase. It was also shown that the optimum buffer conditions for renaturation of the immobilized luciferase were the same as those for the renaturation in solution. Also, it was indicated that electrostatic interactions between a protein and the matrix have a negative effect on renaturation of the immobilized luciferase since the renaturation yield decreased at acidic pH only for the immobilized luciferase. These novel observations are described in detail in this paper.