Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase binding to DNA by thymidine dimer

The ability of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase to bind damaged DNA was assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. DNA binding domain of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARPDBD) binds to synthetic deoxyribonucleotide duplex 10-mer. However, the synthetic deoxyribonucleotide duplex containing cys-syn thymidine dimer which produces the unwinding of DNA helix structure lost its affinity to PARPDBD. It was shown that the binding of PARPDBD to the synthetic deoxyribonucleotide duplex was not affected by O6-Me-dG which causes only minor distortion of DNA helix structure. This study suggests that the stabilized DNA helix structure is important for poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase binding to DNA breaks, which are known to stimulate catalytic activity of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase.     

Detection of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and its reaction product poly(ADP-ribose) by immunocytochemistry

Summary Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase catalyses the formation of ADP-ribose polymers covalently attached to various nuclear proteins, using NAD⁺ as substrate. The activity of this enzyme is strongly stimulated upon binding to DNA single or double strand breaks. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is an immediate cellular response to DNA damage and is thought to be involved in DNA repair, genetic recombination, apoptosis and other processes during which DNA strand breaks are formed. In recent years we and others have established cell culture systems with altered poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. Here we describe immunocytochemistry protocols based on the use of antibodies against the DNA-binding domain of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and against its reaction product poly(ADP-ribose). These protocols allow for the convenient mass screening of cell transfectants with overexpression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase or of a dominant-negative mutant for this enzyme, i.e. the DNA-binding domain. In addition, the immunocytochemical detection of poly(ADP-ribose) allows screening for cells with altered enzyme activity.     

The DNA topoisomerase IIbeta binding protein 1 (TopBP1) interacts with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1)

We investigated the physical association of the DNA topoisomerase IIbeta binding protein 1 (TopBP1), involved in DNA replication and repair but also in regulation of apoptosis, with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). This enzyme plays a crucial role in DNA repair and interacts with many DNA replication/repair factors. It was shown that the sixth BRCA1 C-terminal (BRCT) domain of TopBP1 interacts with a protein fragment of PARP-1 in vitro containing the DNA-binding and the automodification domains. More significantly, the in vivo interaction of endogenous TopBP1 and PARP-1 proteins could be shown in HeLa-S3 cells by co-immunoprecipitation. TopBP1 and PARP-1 are localized within overlapping regions in the nucleus of HeLa-S3 cells as shown by immunofluorescence. Exposure to UVB light slightly enhanced the interaction between both proteins. Furthermore, TopBP1 was detected in nuclear regions where poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) synthesis takes place and is ADP-ribosylated by PARP-1. Finally, cellular (ADP-ribosyl)ating activity impairs binding of TopBP1 to Myc-interacting zinc finger protein-1 (Miz-1). The results indicate an influence of post-translational modifications of TopBP1 on its function during DNA repair.     

Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by DNA structure-specific binding

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is an intracellular sensor of DNA strand breaks and plays a critical role in cellular responses to DNA damage. In normally functioning cells, PARP-1 enzymatic activity has been linked to the alterations in chromatin structure associated with gene expression. However, the molecular determinants for PARP-1 recruitment to specific sites in chromatin in the absence of DNA strand breaks remain obscure. Using gel shift and enzymatic footprinting assays and atomic force microscopy, we show that PARP-1 recognizes distortions in the DNA helical backbone and that it binds to three- and four-way junctions as well as to stably unpaired regions in double-stranded DNA. PARP-1 interactions with non-B DNA structures are functional and lead to its catalytic activation. DNA hairpins, cruciforms, and stably unpaired regions are all effective co-activators of PARP-1 auto-modification and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histone H1 in the absence of free DNA ends. Enzyme kinetic analyses revealed that the structural features of non-B form DNA co-factors are important for PARP-1 catalysis activated by undamaged DNA. K0.5 constants for DNA co-factors, which are structurally different in the degree of base pairing and spatial DNA organization, follow the order: cruciform相似文献   

Two proteolytic degradation products of calf-thymus poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase are efficient ADP-ribose acceptors. Implications for polymerase architecture and the automodification of the polymerase

Two polypeptides with molecular masses of 76 and 59 kDa were found to copurify with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase from calf thymus, and to be as efficient acceptors of ADP-ribose as the polymerase itself. Analysis of their CNBr fragments by sodium dodecylsulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that the polypeptides were derived from the 112-kDa polymerase. Isolation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the absence of protease inhibitors resulted in a loss of more than 90% of the polymerase activity and an increased proportion of the 76-kDa and 59-kDa polypeptides in the final polymerase preparation. When the polymerase and the two polypeptides were separated by gel filtration or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 5% acetic acid, no polymerase activity was found associated with the two fragments. Analysis of the CNBr fragments of the three polypeptides after incubation of the enzyme preparation with [32P]NAD showed that most of the fragments were radioactive, indicating multiple ADP-ribosylation sites. Several ADP-ribosylated fragments were found to be common to all three polypeptides, or to two of them.     

Reaction mechanism for automodification of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase

The reaction mechanism of automodification of poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase was studied. The synthetase, bound to nicked DNA-cellulose in a small column, was pulse-labelled with [3H]NAD in the presence of Mg2+, and then chased with [14C]NAD under the same conditions after complete washing of [3H]NAD. The poly(ADP-ribose), synthesized on the synthetase molecule, was digested with snake venom phosphodiesterase and analyzed. The [3H]-labeled product (35% of the total product) was identified as isoADP-ribose but [3H]-labelled AMP was not detected. The average chain length was 16.0 and the terminal AMP was detected as [14C]-labelled AMP. These results indicate that the initially attached ADP-ribose unit at an automodification site was successively elongated by the addition of a new ADP-ribose unit to the terminal AMP moiety.     

Enzymological properties of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase: characterization of automodification sites and NADase activity.

We have characterized the effect of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase automodification on the enzyme's activities, which include poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis and NADase activity. The apparent Km of the enzyme for NAD+ during polymer synthesis is higher than the one measured for alternate NADase activity. Furthermore, we have found that there are 28 automodification sites, in contrast to the 15 sites (postulated to be on the 15 glutamic acids) reported to be present in the automodification domain. For the first time, we show that some of these acceptor sites are outside the reported automodification domain (15 kDa); we demonstrate automodification in the NAD+ binding domain (55.2 kDa) and the DNA binding domain (42.5 kDa). We have analyzed the relationship between the number of sites modified on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and its effect on the polymerization activity and its alternate NADase activity. Automodification greatly altered both enzyme activities, decreasing both polymer synthesis and alternate NADase activity.     

Liver poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase is resistant to cleavage by caspases

In hepatocytes the DNA repair enzyme poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) is not proteolytically cleaved during apoptosis. The reason for this was investigated using a cell-free system that consisted of isolated nuclei from hepatocytes or thymocytes and cytosolic extracts from hepatocytes or thymocytes undergoing apoptosis. It was found that liver PARP is resistant to proteolytic cleavage by the caspases present in the cytosolic extracts. Furthermore, liver PARP was not cleaved by recombinant human caspase-3. It is concluded that PARP proteolysis cannot be used as a marker for hepatocyte apoptosis.     

3'-Deoxy-NAD+ as a substrate for poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and the reaction mechanism of poly(ADP-ribose) elongation

Adenyl-32P-Labeled 3'-deoxy-NAD+ was utilized as a substrate by pure DNA-dependent poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) from calf thymus in the automodification reaction with an apparent Km of 20 microM and a Vmax of 80 nmol/min/mg of protein. Analysis by lithium lauryl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed a single 32P-labeled protein of 116-kDa which comigrated with automodified enzyme. Addition of increasing amounts of histone H1 up to a concentration of 15 micrograms/ml stimulated the synthesis of protein-bound polymers of 3'-deoxy-ADP-ribose. However, the average polymer size was equal to 2 in the presence and 4 in the absence of histone H1, respectively. The synthesis of protein-bound oligomers of 3'-deoxy-ADP-ribose was inhibited by the polymerase inhibitors benzamide, nicotinamide, thymidine, and NaCl. A pulse labeling of polymer synthesis with 40 microM [32P]3'-deoxy-NAD+ either in the presence or absence of 15 micrograms/ml of histone H1, followed by a chase with 1 mM [3H]NAD+, was used to determine the mechanism of poly(ADP-ribose) elongation. Following enzyme digestion of these polymers with phosphodiesterase, it was found that 52 and 24% of the total 32P radiolabel was associated with the 3'-deoxy-AMP termini of the polymers synthesized in the pulse reactions, in the presence or absence of histone H1, respectively. In contrast, less than 10% of the total radioactivity was associated with 3'-deoxy-AMP in the product of the chase reactions. These results are consistent with the conclusion that the initially attached residue of 3'-deoxy-ADP-ribose to either the polymerase or histone H1, is elongated by the "protein-distal" addition of ADP-ribose residues to the AMP terminus of the growing polymer chain.     

Base excision repair is efficient in cells lacking poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is a nuclear enzyme that is activated by binding to DNA breaks induced by ionizing radiation or through repair of altered bases in DNA by base excision repair. Mice lacking PARP-1 and, in certain cases, the cells derived from these mice exhibit hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation and alkylating agents. In this study we investigated base excision repair in cells lacking PARP-1 in order to elucidate whether their augmented sensitivity to DNA damaging agents is due to an impairment of the base excision repair pathway. Extracts prepared from wild-type cells or cells lacking PARP-1 were similar in their ability to repair plasmid DNA damaged by either X-rays (single-strand DNA breaks) or by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (methylated bases). In addition, we demonstrated in vivo that PARP-1-deficient cells treated with N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine repaired their genomic DNA as efficiently as wild-type cells. Therefore, we conclude that cells lacking PARP-1 have a normal capacity to repair single-strand DNA breaks inflicted by X-irradiation or breaks formed during the repair of modified bases. We propose that the hypersensitivity of PARP-1 null mutant cells to γ-irradiation and alkylating agents is not directly due to a defect in DNA repair itself, but rather results from greatly reduced poly(ADP-ribose) formation during base excision repair in these cells.     

The human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase nuclear localization signal is a bipartite element functionally separate from DNA binding and catalytic activity.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP, EC 2.4.2.30) is a zinc finger DNA-binding protein involved in DNA repair processes in eukaryotes. By deletion and extensive site-directed mutagenesis, its DNA-binding domain fused to the N-terminus of beta-galactosidase was shown to contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS) of the form KRK-X(11)-KKKSKK (residues 207-226). In vitro, both the DNA-binding capacity and the polymerizing activity of PARP are independent of the nuclear location function. Each basic cluster is essential but not sufficient on its own for this function, while both motifs together are. Crucial basic amino acids (K207, R208 and K222) in each of these two motifs are required for nuclear homing. The results presented here support the concept that the human PARP NLS is an autonomous functional element and belongs to the class of bipartite NLSs. We show that the linear distance between the two basic clusters is not crucial. Insertional mutation analysis leading to a partial reversion of the cytoplasmic phenotype displayed by the mutant K222I highlights the crucial positioning of this lysine. The structure-function relationship of the second cluster of basic residues is discussed.     

Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Histone-specific adaptations of reaction products

The post-translational poly ADP-ribosylation of proteins by the nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) involves a complex pattern of ADP-ribose polymers. We have determined how this enzyme produces the various polymer size patterns responsible for altered protein function. The results show that histone H1 and core histones are potent regulators of both the numbers and sizes of ADP-ribose polymers. Each histone induced the polymerase to synthesize a specific polymer size pattern. Various other basic and/or DNA binding proteins as well as other known stimulators of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (spermine, MgCl2, nicked DNA) were ineffective as polymer size modulators. Testing specific proteolytic fragments of histone H1, the polymer number and polymer size modulating activity could be mapped to specific polypeptide domains. The results suggest that histones specifically regulate the polymer termination reaction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.     

Herpes simplex virus 1 infection activates poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and triggers the degradation of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase

Herpes simplex virus 1 infection triggers multiple changes in the metabolism of host cells, including a dramatic decrease in the levels of NAD(+). In addition to its role as a cofactor in reduction-oxidation reactions, NAD(+) is required for certain posttranslational modifications. Members of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of enzymes are major consumers of NAD(+), which they utilize to form poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains on protein substrates in response to DNA damage. PAR chains can subsequently be removed by the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). We report here that the HSV-1 infection-induced drop in NAD(+) levels required viral DNA replication, was associated with an increase in protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), and was blocked by pharmacological inhibition of PARP-1/PARP-2 (PARP-1/2). Neither virus yield nor the cellular metabolic reprogramming observed during HSV-1 infection was altered by the rescue or further depletion of NAD(+) levels. Expression of the viral protein ICP0, which possesses E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, was both necessary and sufficient for the degradation of the 111-kDa PARG isoform. This work demonstrates that HSV-1 infection results in changes to NAD(+) metabolism by PARP-1/2 and PARG, and as PAR chain accumulation can induce caspase-independent apoptosis, we speculate that the decrease in PARG levels enhances the auto-PARylation-mediated inhibition of PARP, thereby avoiding premature death of the infected cell.     

Analysis of the activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by various types of DNA.

In this work, we examined the activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by various types of DNA. We have found that the best activator for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is an octanucleotide. However, the use of a defined activated DNA is also suitable.     

Cytological detection of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase

An attempt was made to demonstrate poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cytologically. In vitro incorporation from the nucleotide, [³H]NAD was detected in frozen sections of onion embryo and meristematic tissue by autoradiography. In meristematic tissue, there was a correlation between the number of cells displaying intensein vitro incorporation from [³H]NAD and cytological DNA polymerase activity. Performed enzymes effecting a distinct incorporation from [³H]NAd were localized in the nuclei of all tissues of the ungerminated seed except the endosperm. Evidence for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase has been obtained for the first time from higher plant cells and localized cytologically.     

Regulatory mechanisms of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase

Here, we describe the latest developments on the mechanistic characterization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [EC 2.4.2.30], a DNA-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of protein-bound ADP-ribose polymers in eucaryotic chromatin. A detailed kinetic analysis of the automodification reaction of PARP in the presence of nicked dsDNA indicates that protein-poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation probably occurs via a sequential mechanism since enzyme-bound ADP-ribose chains are not reaction intermediates. The multiple enzymatic activities catalyzed by PARP (initiation, elongation, branching and self-modification) are the subject of a very complex regulatory mechanism that may involve allosterism. For instance, while the NAD+ concentration determines the average ADP-ribose polymer size (polymerization reaction), the frequency of DNA strand breaks determines the total number of ADP-ribose chains synthesized (initiation reaction). A general discussion of some of the mechanisms that regulate these multiple catalytic activities of PARP is presented below.