Synapsis of recombination signal sequences located in cis and DNA underwinding in V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination requires binding and synapsis of a complementary (12/23) pair of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, aided by a high-mobility group protein, HMG1 or HMG2. Double-strand DNA cleavage within this synaptic, or paired, complex is thought to involve DNA distortion or melting near the site of cleavage. Although V(D)J recombination normally occurs between RSSs located on the same DNA molecule (in cis), all previous studies that directly assessed RSS synapsis were performed with the two DNA substrates in trans. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a facilitated circularization assay using DNA substrates of reduced length to assess synapsis of RSSs in cis. We show that a 12/23 pair of RSSs is the preferred substrate for synapsis of cis RSSs and that the efficiency of pairing is dependent upon RAG1-RAG2 stoichiometry. Synapsis in cis occurs rapidly and is kinetically favored over synapsis of RSSs located in trans. This experimental system also allowed the generation of underwound DNA substrates containing pairs of RSSs in cis. Importantly, we found that the RAG proteins cleave such substrates substantially more efficiently than relaxed substrates and that underwinding may enhance RSS synapsis as well as RAG1/2-mediated catalysis. The energy stored in such underwound substrates may be used in the generation of DNA distortion and/or protein conformational changes needed for synapsis and cleavage. We propose that this unwinding is uniquely sensed during synapsis of an appropriate 12/23 pair of RSSs.     

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of recombination signal sequence configuration in the RAG1/2 synaptic complex

A critical step in V(D)J recombination is the synapsis of complementary (12/23) recombination signal sequences (RSSs) by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins to generate the paired complex (PC). Using a facilitated ligation assay and substrates that vary the helical phasing of the RSSs, we provide evidence that one particular geometric configuration of the RSSs is favored in the PC. To investigate this configuration further, we used fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) to detect the synapsis of fluorescently labeled RSS oligonucleotides. FRET requires an appropriate 12/23 RSS pair, a divalent metal ion, and high-mobility-group protein HMGB1 or HMGB2. Energy transfer between the RSSs was detected with all 12/23 RSS end positions of the fluorescent probes but was not detected when probes were placed on the two ends of the same RSS. Energy transfer was confirmed to originate from the PC by using an in-gel FRET assay. The results argue against a unique planar configuration of the RSSs in the PC and are most easily accommodated by models in which synapsed 12- and 23-RSSs are bent and cross one another, with implications for the organization of the RAG proteins and the DNA substrates at the time of cleavage.     

The beyond 12/23 restriction is imposed at the nicking and pairing steps of DNA cleavage during V(D)J recombination

The beyond 12/23 (B12/23) rule ensures inclusion of a Dbeta gene segment in the assembled T-cell receptor (TCR) beta variable region exon and is manifest by a failure of direct Vbeta-to-Jbeta gene segment joining. The restriction is enforced during the DNA cleavage step of V(D)J recombination by the recombination-activating gene 1 and 2 (RAG1/2) proteins and the recombination signal sequences (RSSs) flanking the TCRbeta gene segments. Nothing is known about the step(s) at which DNA cleavage is defective or how TCRbeta locus sequences contribute to these defects. To address this, we examined the steps of DNA cleavage by the RAG proteins using TCRbeta locus V, D, and J RSS oligonucleotide substrates. The results demonstrate that the B12/23 rule is enforced through slow nicking of Jbeta substrates and to some extent through poor synapsis of Vbeta and Jbeta substrates. Nicking is controlled largely by the coding flank and, unexpectedly, the RSS spacer, while synapsis is controlled primarily by the RSS nonamer. The results demonstrate that different Jbeta substrates are crippled at different steps of cleavage by distinct combinations of defects in the various DNA elements and strongly suggest that the DNA nicking step of V(D)J recombination can be rate limiting in vivo.     

RAG and HMGB1 create a large bend in the 23RSS in the V(D)J recombination synaptic complexes

During V(D)J recombination, recombination activating gene proteins RAG1 and RAG2 generate DNA double strand breaks within a paired complex (PC) containing two complementary recombination signal sequences (RSSs), the 12RSS and 23RSS, which differ in the length of the spacer separating heptamer and nonamer elements. Despite the central role of the PC in V(D)J recombination, little is understood about its structure. Here, we use fluorescence resonance energy transfer to investigate the architecture of the 23RSS in the PC. Energy transfer was detected in 23RSS substrates in which the donor and acceptor fluorophores flanked the entire RSS, and was optimal under conditions that yield a cleavage-competent PC. The data are most easily explained by a dramatic bend in the 23RSS that reduces the distance between these flanking regions from >160 Å in the linear substrate to <80 Å in the PC. Analysis of multiple fluorescent substrates together with molecular dynamics modeling yielded a model in which the 23RSS adopts a U shape in the PC, with the spacer located centrally within the bend. We propose that this large bend facilitates simultaneous recognition of the heptamer and nonamer, is critical for proper positioning of the active site and contributes to the 12/23 rule.     

Molecular Mechanism Underlying RAG1/RAG2 Synaptic Complex Formation

Two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, RAG1 and RAG2 (RAG), initiate V(D)J recombination by assembling a synaptic complex with recombination signal sequences (RSSs) abutting two different antigen receptor gene coding segments, and then introducing a DNA double strand break at the end of each RSS. Despite the biological importance of this system, the structure of the synaptic complex, and the RAG protein stoichiometry and arrangement of DNA within the synaptosome, remains poorly understood. Here we applied atomic force microscopy to directly visualize and characterize RAG synaptic complexes. We report that the pre-cleavage RAG synaptic complex contains about twice the protein content as a RAG complex bound to a single RSS, with a calculated mass consistent with a pair of RAG heterotetramers. In the synaptic complex, the RSSs are predominantly oriented in a side-by-side configuration with no DNA strand crossover. The mass of the synaptic complex, and the conditions under which it is formed in vitro, favors an association model of assembly in which isolated RAG-RSS complexes undergo synapsis mediated by RAG protein-protein interactions. The replacement of Mg²⁺ cations with Ca²⁺ leads to a dramatic change in protein stoichiometry for all RAG-RSS complexes, suggesting that the cation composition profoundly influences the type of complex assembled.To generate diverse surface antigen receptor molecules, developing lymphocytes undergo a series of site-specific DNA rearrangements to assemble functional antigen receptor genes from component gene segments (1). This DNA rearrangement process, known as V(D)J recombination, is initiated when two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, called RAG1 and RAG2, assemble a multiprotein synaptic complex with a pair of antigen receptor gene segments and subsequently introduce a DNA double strand break at the end of each gene segment (2). A recombination signal sequence (RSS)³ that abuts each participating gene segment serves as the binding site of the RAG proteins and directs the location of DNA cleavage. Each RSS contains conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences that are separated by either 12 or 23 bp of DNA of more varied sequence (12RSS and 23RSS, respectively); efficient V(D)J recombination generally only occurs between two RSSs in which the lengths of DNA separating the heptamer and nonamer differ (the 12/23 rule). The RAG proteins mediate DNA cleavage via a nick-hairpin mechanism, breaking the DNA between the RSS heptamer and the coding segment; these reaction products are subsequently processed and repaired by the non-homologous end-joining pathway (1, 3).Previous studies suggest that RAG synaptic complexes are assembled through the stepwise binding of a 12RSS followed by the capture of a 23RSS (4–6). In vitro biochemical studies suggest synapsis is mediated by a RAG1/2 heterotetramer, but there remains disagreement over the stoichiometry of RAG1 in these complexes (7). In addition, fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques have recently been applied to examine the orientation of DNA strands within the synaptic complex. The data obtained from these experiments led the authors to favor a model in which the RSSs adopt a bent and crossed configuration in the synaptic complex, although an alternative model in which synaptic complexes containing RSSs in parallel and antiparallel configurations assemble with similar frequency could not be formally excluded (8). For most in vitro biochemical studies, the synaptic complex has been assembled by incubating the RAG proteins with a pair of oligonucleotide substrates, one containing a 12RSS, and one containing a 23RSS. Whether the RAG proteins and the RSSs adopt the same configuration in synaptic complexes assembled with oligonucleotide substrates as those assembled with longer, more physiological substrates remains to be verified, but some studies suggest there are DNA length-dependent differences in RAG-mediated RSS binding and cleavage activity (9, 35).To directly observe and analyze RAG-RSS synaptic complexes assembled on long DNA substrates that more closely model an RSS embedded in chromosomal DNA, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM), given its previously demonstrated success for visualizing synaptic complexes in other systems (10–14), and its ability to reveal structural details for synaptic complexes that correlate well with independently obtained crystallographic data (15). AFM has also been recently applied to study the bending of 12RSS substrates by RAG1 and RAG2 (16). We report here the first successful visualization of RAG-RSS synaptic complexes by AFM, and describe their characterization with respect to DNA arrangement and the protein stoichiometry within the complexes. These data provide new and important insight into how RAG-RSS synaptic complexes are assembled and organized.     

Effect of CpG methylation on RAG1/RAG2 reactivity: implications of direct and indirect mechanisms for controlling V(D)J cleavage

It has been suggested that DNA methylation/demethylation is involved in regulating V(D)J rearrangement. Although methylated DNA is thought to induce an inaccessible chromatin structure, it is unclear whether DNA methylation can directly control V(D)J recombination independently of chromatin structure. In this study, we tested whether DNA methylation directly affects the reactivity of the RAG1/RAG2 complex. Specific methylation within the heptamer of the recombination signal sequences (RSS) markedly reduced V(D)J cleavage without inhibiting RAG1/RAG2–DNA complex formation. By contrast, methylation at other positions around the RSS did not affect the reactivity of the RAG proteins. The presence of a methyl-CpG binding-domain protein inhibited the binding of the RAG1/RAG2 complex to all the methylated CpG sites that were tested. Our findings suggest that DNA methylation around the RSS may have a previously unexpected function in regulating V(D)J recombination by directly inhibiting V(D)J cleavage, in addition to its general function of inducing an inaccessible chromatin configuration.     

Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 that demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding-end DNA

In V(D)J joining of antigen receptor genes, two recombination signal sequences (RSSs), 12- and 23-RSSs, form a complex with the protein products of recombination activating genes, RAG1 and RAG2. DNaseI footprinting demonstrates that the interaction of RAG proteins with substrate RSS DNA is not just limited to the signal region but involves the coding sequence as well. Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding region in both pre- and postcleavage type complexes. A possible role of this RAG coding region interaction is discussed in the context of V(D)J recombination.     

HMGB1/2 can target DNA for illegitimate cleavage by the RAG1/2 complex

Background  

V(D)J recombination is initiated in antigen receptor loci by the pairwise cleavage of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins via a nick-hairpin mechanism. The RSS contains highly conserved heptamer (consensus: 5'-CACAGTG) and nonamer (consensus: 5'-ACAAAAACC) motifs separated by either 12- or 23-base pairs of poorly conserved sequence. The high mobility group proteins HMGB1 and HMGB2 (HMGB1/2) are highly abundant architectural DNA binding proteins known to promote RAG-mediated synapsis and cleavage of consensus recombination signals in vitro by facilitating RSS binding and bending by the RAG1/2 complex. HMGB1/2 are known to recognize distorted DNA structures such as four-way junctions, and damaged or modified DNA. Whether HMGB1/2 can promote RAG-mediated DNA cleavage at sites lacking a canonical RSS by targeting or stabilizing structural distortions is unclear, but is important for understanding the etiology of chromosomal translocations involving antigen receptor genes and proto-oncogene sequences that do not contain an obvious RSS-like element.     

Cooperative recruitment of HMGB1 during V(D)J recombination through interactions with RAG1 and DNA

During V(D)J recombination, recombination activating gene (RAG)1 and RAG2 bind and cleave recombination signal sequences (RSSs), aided by the ubiquitous DNA-binding/-bending proteins high-mobility group box protein (HMGB)1 or HMGB2. HMGB1/2 play a critical, although poorly understood, role in vitro in the assembly of functional RAG–RSS complexes, into which HMGB1/2 stably incorporate. The mechanism of HMGB1/2 recruitment is unknown, although an interaction with RAG1 has been suggested. Here, we report data demonstrating only a weak HMGB1–RAG1 interaction in the absence of DNA in several assays, including fluorescence anisotropy experiments using a novel Alexa488-labeled HMGB1 protein. Addition of DNA to RAG1 and HMGB1 in fluorescence anisotropy experiments, however, results in a substantial increase in complex formation, indicating a synergistic binding effect. Pulldown experiments confirmed these results, as HMGB1 was recruited to a RAG1–DNA complex in a RAG1 concentration-dependent manner and, interestingly, without strict RSS sequence specificity. Our finding that HMGB1 binds more tightly to a RAG1–DNA complex over RAG1 or DNA alone provides an explanation for the stable integration of this typically transient architectural protein in the V(D)J recombinase complex throughout recombination. These findings also have implications for the order of events during RAG–DNA complex assembly and for the stabilization of sequence-specific and non-specific RAG1–DNA interactions.     

DNA cleavage of a cryptic recombination signal sequence by RAG1 and RAG2. Implications for partial V(H) gene replacement

Antibody and T cell receptor genes are assembled from gene segments by V(D)J recombination to produce an almost infinitely diverse repertoire of antigen specificities. Recombination is initiated by cleavage of conserved recombination signal sequences (RSS) by RAG1 and RAG2 during lymphocyte development. Recent evidence demonstrates that recombination can occur at noncanonical RSS sites within Ig genes or at other loci, outside the context of normal lymphocyte receptor gene rearrangement. We have characterized the ability of the RAG proteins to bind and cleave a cryptic RSS (cRSS) located within an Ig V(H) gene segment. The RAG proteins bound with sequence specificity to either the consensus RSS or the cRSS. The RAG proteins nick the cRSS on both the top and bottom strands, thereby bypassing the formation of the DNA hairpin intermediate observed in RAG cleavage of canonical RSS substrates. We propose that the RAG proteins may utilize an alternative mechanism for double-stranded DNA cleavage, depending on the substrate sequence. These results have implications for further diversification of the antigen receptor repertoire as well as the role of the RAG proteins in genomic instability.     

The central domain of core RAG1 preferentially recognizes single-stranded recombination signal sequence heptamer

RAG1 and RAG2 initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA double strand breaks between each selected gene segment and its bordering recombination signal sequence (RSS) in a two-step mechanism in which the DNA is first nicked, followed by hairpin formation. The RSS consists of a conserved nonamer and heptamer sequence, in which the latter borders the site of DNA cleavage. A region within RAG1, referred to as the central domain (residues 528-760 of 1040 in the full-length protein), has been shown previously to bind specifically to the double-stranded (ds) RSS heptamer, but with both weak specificity and affinity. However, additional investigations into the RAG1-RSS heptamer interaction are required because the DNA substrate forms intermediate conformations during the V(D)J recombination reaction. These include the nicked and hairpin products, as well as likely base unpairing to produce single-stranded (ss) DNA near the cleavage site. Here, it was determined that although the central domain showed substantially higher binding affinity for ss and nicked versus ds substrate, the interaction with ss RSS was particularly robust. In addition, the central domain bound with greater sequence specificity to the ss RSS heptamer than to the ds form. This study provides important insight into the V(D)J recombination reaction, specifically that significant interaction of the RSS heptamer with RAG1 occurs only after the induction of conformational changes at the RSS heptamer.     

A dimer of the lymphoid protein RAG1 recognizes the recombination signal sequence and the complex stably incorporates the high mobility group protein HMG2.

RAG1 and RAG2 are the two lymphoid-specific proteins required for the cleavage of DNA sequences known as the recombination signal sequences (RSSs) flanking V, D or J regions of the antigen-binding genes. Previous studies have shown that RAG1 alone is capable of binding to the RSS, whereas RAG2 only binds as a RAG1/RAG2 complex. We have expressed recombinant core RAG1 (amino acids 384-1008) in Escherichia coli and demonstrated catalytic activity when combined with RAG2. This protein was then used to determine its oligomeric forms and the dissociation constant of binding to the RSS. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays show that up to three oligomeric complexes of core RAG1 form with a single RSS. Core RAG1 was found to exist as a dimer both when free in solution and as the minimal species bound to the RSS. Competition assays show that RAG1 recognizes both the conserved nonamer and heptamer sequences of the RSS. Zinc analysis shows the core to contain two zinc ions. The purified RAG1 protein overexpressed in E.coli exhibited the expected cleavage activity when combined with RAG2 purified from transfected 293T cells. The high mobility group protein HMG2 is stably incorporated into the recombinant RAG1/RSS complex and can increase the affinity of RAG1 for the RSS in the absence of RAG2.     

Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking

V(D)J recombination is initiated by double-strand cleavage at recombination signal sequences (RSSs). DNA cleavage is mediated by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. Recent experiments describing RAG protein-RSS complexes, while defining the interaction of RAG1 with the nonamer, have not assigned contacts immediately adjacent to the site of DNA cleavage to either RAG polypeptide. Here we use UV cross-linking to define sequence- and site-specific interactions between RAG1 protein and both the heptamer element of the RSS and the coding flank DNA. Hence, RAG1-DNA contacts span the site of cleavage. We also detect cross-linking of RAG2 protein to some of the same nucleotides that cross-link to RAG1, indicating that, in the binding complex, both RAG proteins are in close proximity to the site of cleavage. These results suggest how the heptamer element, the recognition surface essential for DNA cleavage, is recognized by the RAG proteins and have implications for the stoichiometry and active site organization of the RAG1-RAG2-RSS complex.     

Inverse transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins: role reversal of donor and target DNA

The lymphoid-specific proteins RAG1 and RAG2 initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA double-strand breaks at the recombination signal sequences (RSSs). In addition to DNA cleavage, the versatile RAG1/2 complex is capable of catalyzing several other reactions, including hybrid joint formation and the transposition of signal ends into a second DNA. Here we show that the RAG1/2 complex also mediates an unusual strand transfer reaction, inverse transposition, in which non-RSS DNA is cleaved and subsequently transferred to an RSS sequence by direct transesterification. Characterization of the reaction products and requirements suggests that inverse transposition is related to both hybrid joint formation and signal-end transposition. This aberrant activity provides another possible mechanism for some chromosomal translocations present in lymphoid tumors.     

Non-consensus heptamer sequences destabilize the RAG post-cleavage complex,making ends available to alternative DNA repair pathways

V(D)J recombination entails double-stranded DNA cleavage at the antigen receptor loci by the RAG1/2 proteins, which recognize conserved recombination signal sequences (RSSs) adjoining variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments. After cleavage, RAG1/2 remain associated with the coding and signal ends (SE) in a post-cleavage complex (PCC), which is critical for their proper joining by classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Certain mutations in RAG1/2 destabilize the PCC, allowing DNA ends to access inappropriate repair pathways such as alternative NHEJ, an error-prone pathway implicated in chromosomal translocations. The PCC is thus thought to discourage aberrant rearrangements by controlling repair pathway choice. Since interactions between RAG1/2 and the RSS heptamer element are especially important in forming the RAG-SE complex, we hypothesized that non-consensus heptamer sequences might affect PCC stability. We find that certain non-consensus heptamers, including a cryptic heptamer implicated in oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements, destabilize the PCC, allowing coding and SEs to be repaired by non-standard pathways, including alternative NHEJ. These data suggest that some non-consensus RSS, frequently present at chromosomal translocations in lymphoid neoplasms, may promote genomic instability by a novel mechanism, disabling the PCC’s ability to restrict repair pathway choice.     

A RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer supports 12/23-regulated synapsis,cleavage, and transposition of V(D)J recombination signals

Initiation of V(D)J recombination involves the synapsis and cleavage of a 12/23 pair of recombination signal sequences by RAG-1 and RAG-2. Ubiquitous nonspecific DNA-bending factors of the HMG box family, such as HMG-1, are known to assist in these processes. After cleavage, the RAG proteins remain bound to the cut signal ends and, at least in vitro, support the integration of these ends into unrelated target DNA via a transposition-like mechanism. To investigate whether the protein complex supporting synapsis, cleavage, and transposition of V(D)J recombination signals utilized the same complement of RAG and HMG proteins, I compared the RAG protein stoichiometries and activities of discrete protein-DNA complexes assembled on intact, prenicked, or precleaved recombination signal sequence (RSS) substrates in the absence and presence of HMG-1. In the absence of HMG-1, I found that two discrete RAG-1/RAG-2 complexes are detected by mobility shift assay on all RSS substrates tested. Both contain dimeric RAG-1 and either one or two RAG-2 subunits. The addition of HMG-1 supershifts both complexes without altering the RAG protein stoichiometry. I find that 12/23-regulated recombination signal synapsis and cleavage are only supported in a protein-DNA complex containing HMG-1 and a RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer. Interestingly, the RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer also supports transposition, but HMG-1 is dispensable for its activity.     

A Non-Sequence-Specific DNA Binding Mode of RAG1 Is Inhibited by RAG2

RAG1 and RAG2 proteins catalyze site-specific DNA cleavage reactions in V(D)J recombination, a process that assembles antigen receptor genes from component gene segments during lymphocyte development. The first step towards the DNA cleavage reaction is the sequence-specific association of the RAG proteins with the conserved recombination signal sequence (RSS), which flanks each gene segment in the antigen receptor loci. Questions remain as to the contribution of each RAG protein to recognition of the RSS. For example, while RAG1 alone is capable of recognizing the conserved elements of the RSS, it is not clear if or how RAG2 may enhance sequence-specific associations with the RSS. To shed light on this issue, we examined the association of RAG1, with and without RAG2, with consensus RSS versus non-RSS substrates using fluorescence anisotropy and gel mobility shift assays. The results indicate that while RAG1 can recognize the RSS, the sequence-specific interaction under physiological conditions is masked by a high-affinity non-sequence-specific DNA binding mode. Significantly, addition of RAG2 effectively suppressed the association of RAG1 with non-sequence-specific DNA, resulting in a large differential in binding affinity for the RSS versus the non-RSS sites. We conclude that this represents a major means by which RAG2 contributes to the initial recognition of the RSS and that, therefore, association of RAG1 with RAG2 is required for effective interactions with the RSS in developing lymphocytes.     

Modulation of RAG/DNA complex by HSP70 in V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination, a site-specific gene rearrangement process, requires two RAG1 and RAG2 proteins specifically recognizing recombination signal sequences and forming DNA double-strand breaks. The broken DNA ends tightly bound to RAG proteins are joined by repair proteins. Here, we found that heat shock protein 70 was associated with RAG2 following two-step affinity chromatography purification. It was also co-immunoprecipitated with RAG2 in pro-B cells. Purified HSP70 protein disrupted RAG/DNA complexes assembled in vitro and also inhibited the V(D)J cleavage (both nick and hairpin formation) in a dose-dependent manner. This HSP70 action required ATP energy. These data suggest that HSP70 might play a crucial role in disassembling RAG/DNA complexes stably formed during V(D)J recombination.     

Assembly Pathway and Characterization of the RAG1/2-DNA Paired and Signal-end Complexes

Mammalian immune receptor diversity is established via a unique restricted set of site-specific DNA rearrangements in lymphoid cells, known as V(D)J recombination. The lymphoid-specific RAG1-RAG2 protein complex (RAG1/2) initiates this process by binding to two types of recombination signal sequences (RSS), 12RSS and 23RSS, and cleaving at the boundaries of RSS and V, D, or J gene segments, which are to be assembled into immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors. Here we dissect the ordered assembly of the RAG1/2 heterotetramer with 12RSS and 23RSS DNAs. We find that RAG1/2 binds only a single 12RSS or 23RSS and reserves the second DNA-binding site specifically for the complementary RSS, to form a paired complex that reflects the known 12/23 rule of V(D)J recombination. The assembled RAG1/2 paired complex is active in the presence of Mg²⁺, the physiologically relevant metal ion, in nicking and double-strand cleavage of both RSS DNAs to produce a signal-end complex. We report here the purification and initial crystallization of the RAG1/2 signal-end complex for atomic-resolution structure elucidation. Strict pairing of the 12RSS and 23RSS at the binding step, together with information from the crystal structure of RAG1/2, leads to a molecular explanation of the 12/23 rule.