Epac Activates the Small G Proteins Rap1 and Rab3A to Achieve Exocytosis

Exocytosis of the acrosome (the acrosome reaction) relies on cAMP production, assembly of a proteinaceous fusion machinery, calcium influx from the extracellular medium, and mobilization from inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive intracellular stores. Addition of cAMP to human sperm suspensions bypasses some of these requirements and elicits exocytosis in a protein kinase A- and extracellular calcium-independent manner. The relevant cAMP target is Epac, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rap. We show here that a soluble adenylyl cyclase synthesizes the cAMP required for the acrosome reaction. Epac stimulates the exchange of GDP for GTP on Rap1, upstream of a phospholipase C. The Epac-selective cAMP analogue 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP induces a phospholipase C-dependent calcium mobilization in human sperm suspensions. In addition, our studies identify a novel connection between cAMP and Rab3A, a secretory granule-associated protein, revealing that the latter functions downstream of soluble adenylyl cyclase/cAMP/Epac but not of Rap1. Challenging sperm with calcium or 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP boosts the exchange of GDP for GTP on Rab3A. Recombinant Epac does not release GDP from Rab3A in vitro, suggesting that the Rab3A-GEF activation by cAMP/Epac in vivo is indirect. We propose that Epac sits at a critical point during the exocytotic cascade after which the pathway splits into two limbs, one that assembles the fusion machinery into place and another that elicits intracellular calcium release.During fertilization in eutherian mammals, the spermatozoon must penetrate the zona pellucida to reach the oolema. Only sperm that have completed the acrosome reaction (AR)⁴ can successfully accomplish this task (1). The AR is a regulated exocytosis where the membrane of the acrosome, the single dense core secretory granule in sperm, fuses to the plasma membrane surrounding the anterior portion of the head. This process releases hydrolytic enzymes stored in the granule. These enzymes, together with the physical thrust derived from strong flagellar beating, enable sperm to penetrate the zona pellucida (1, 2). Physiological agonists accomplish the AR by inducing an influx of calcium from the extracellular medium and the assembly of a conserved proteinaceous fusion machinery that includes Rab3A, α-SNAP/NSF, synaptotagmin, complexin, and neurotoxin-sensitive SNAREs; the AR also requires an efflux of calcium from inside the acrosome through IP₃-sensitive channels (reviewed in Refs. 3, 4).In certain neurons, neuroendocrine and exocrine acinar cells, cAMP potentiates calcium-dependent exocytosis. Either cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) or the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) can be the targets of cAMP in the cAMP-regulated exocytosis. On the other hand, cAMP is the principal trigger of regulated secretion in various non-neuronal cells (5–7). Likewise, an elevation of cAMP alone is sufficient to trigger exocytosis in human sperm. Moreover, calcium relies on endogenous cAMP to accomplish acrosomal release, and it does so through a PKA-insensitive pathway involving Epac. The stimulation of endogenous Epac by the selective cAMP analogue 8-(p-chlorophenylthio)-2′-O-methyladenosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP) is sufficient to trigger the AR even in the absence of extracellular calcium. Furthermore, when Epac is sequestered with specific antibodies, cAMP, calcium (8), and recombinant Rab3A (this study) are unable to elicit exocytosis.Epac1 and Epac2 are multidomain proteins that consist of an N-terminal regulatory region and a C-terminal catalytic region (9–11). The regulatory domain harbors the cAMP-binding site, which auto-inhibits the catalytic activity in the absence of cAMP (12–15). The catalytic portion bears a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Rap1 and Rap2 (16, 17). Like all small G proteins, Raps cycle between an inactive GDP-bound and an active GTP-bound conformation. The GDP-GTP cycle is regulated by GEFs that induce the release of the bound GDP to be replaced by the more abundant GTP and by GTPase-activating proteins that coax the intrinsic GTPase activity to rapidly hydrolyze bound GTP, returning the G proteins to the inactive GDP-bound state (18, 19). Most small G proteins are linked to biological membranes via lipid modifications at their C terminus; for instance, Rap2A is farnesylated, and Rap1A/B, Rap2B, and Rabs are geranylgeranylated (20, 21). Guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) remove Rabs from membranes by sequestration of their lipid tails (22).Extracellular stimuli often result in the activation of cellular adenylate cyclases and an increase in cAMP levels. By serving as a cAMP-binding protein with intrinsic GEF activity, Epac couples cAMP production to a variety of Rap-mediated processes such as the control of cell adhesion and cell-cell junction formation, water resorption, cell differentiation, inflammatory processes, etc. (9–11). Many are the effectors of Epac and Epac-Rap signaling. Of particular interest to us is the observation that Epac stimulates phospholipase Cϵ (PLCϵ) through the activation of Rap1 and -2, resulting in IP₃-mediated release of calcium from internal stores (23, 24). PLCϵ is an unusual enzyme with two catalytic activities as follows: the typical phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolyzing PLC activity plus a Rap-GEF activity. Thus, PLCϵ acts both downstream and upstream of Ras-like GTPases, perhaps to guarantee sustained Rap signaling (25).During membrane fusion, Rab proteins direct the recognition and physical attachments of the compartments that are going to fuse (26, 27). This association, or tethering, represents one of the earliest known events in membrane fusion and is accomplished through the recruitment of tethering factors. Rab3A localizes to vesicles and secretory granules and is one of the isoforms directly implicated in regulated exocytosis of neurotransmitters and hormones (28). Rab3A interacts in a GTP-dependent manner with at least two effector proteins, rabphilin and Rim (29–31). Rab3A is present in the acrosomal region of human (32), rat (33), and mouse sperm (34). Rab3A (full-length recombinant protein or a synthetic peptide corresponding to the effector domain) stimulates human (32, 35) and ram (36) and inhibits rat sperm AR (33). Rab3A is required for the AR triggered by calcium (37, 38) and cAMP (8).Epac is a multifunctional protein in which cAMP exerts its effects not only by promoting the exchange of GDP for GTP on Rap but also by allosterically regulating other molecules (10). In exocytosis for instance, a number of Rap-independent, Epac-linked signaling pathways have been described. They include the interaction of Epac2 with Rim2 (39) and the Rim2-related protein Piccolo (40). Epac2 also stimulates exocytosis by interacting with SUR1 (41). Finally, Epac2 controls ryanodine-sensitive calcium channels that are involved in calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) from internal stores in insulin-secreting cells (42).In this study, we piece together the analysis of two phenomena as follows: calcium mobilization and protein-protein interactions preceding exocytosis. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the first integrated molecular model that includes both the assembly of the fusion and intravesicular calcium release protein machineries during regulated exocytosis. By enquiring further into the signaling pathways operating during sperm exocytosis, we have found more players than previously suspected, and we discovered that the key components of these cascades are not arranged in a linear sequence. Epac sits at a central point of the signaling cascade after which the exocytotic pathway splits into two limbs as follows: one that assembles the fusion machinery into place, and another that elicits the release of calcium from the acrosome; both need to act in concert to achieve exocytosis. Our results identify Rab3A for the first time as a downstream target for Epac and place this small GTPase as an early component of the “fusion machinery” branch of the pathway. They also show that Epac stimulates the exchange of GDP for GTP on Rap1 and that this protein, as well as a PLC, drives intracellular calcium mobilization. Finally, our data reveal that a soluble adenylyl cyclase (sAC) (43, 44) synthesizes the cAMP that activates Epac. Again, we believe that this is the first report linking sAC to an exocytotic event.     

The N Terminus of Phosphodiesterase TbrPDEB1 of Trypanosoma brucei Contains the Signal for Integration into the Flagellar Skeleton

The precise subcellular localization of the components of the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling pathways is a crucial aspect of eukaryotic intracellular signaling. In the human pathogen Trypanosoma brucei, the strict control of cAMP levels by cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases is essential for parasite survival, both in cell culture and in the infected host. Among the five cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases identified in this organism, two closely related isoenzymes, T. brucei PDEB1 (TbrPDEB1) (PDEB1) and TbrPDEB2 (PDEB2) are predominantly responsible for the maintenance of cAMP levels. Despite their close sequence similarity, they are distinctly localized in the cell. PDEB1 is mostly located in the flagellum, where it forms an integral part of the flagellar skeleton. PDEB2 is mainly located in the cell body, and only a minor part of the protein localizes to the flagellum. The current study, using transfection of procyclic trypanosomes with green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporters, demonstrates that the N termini of the two enzymes are essential for determining their final subcellular localization. The first 70 amino acids of PDEB1 are sufficient to specifically direct a GFP reporter to the flagellum and to lead to its detergent-resistant integration into the flagellar skeleton. In contrast, the analogous region of PDEB2 causes the GFP reporter to reside predominantly in the cell body. Mutagenesis of selected residues in the N-terminal region of PDEB2 demonstrated that single amino acid changes are sufficient to redirect the reporter from a cell body location to stable integration into the flagellar skeleton.In eukaryotes, the ubiquitous second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP) is generated from ATP by membrane-integral or by cytoplasmic, CO₂-regulated cyclases (35, 44). The cAMP signal is processed by a small group of receiver proteins, including the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (28), cAMP-gated ion channels (4), and the guanine-nucleotide-exchange proteins EPAC1 and EPAC2 (39). The cAMP signal is terminated by the action of a family of cyclic nucleotide-specific phosphodiesterases (PDEs) (9). This paradigm is rather straightforward, involves a limited number of players, and is generally well understood, at least in mammalian cells. However, much less is known about how individual cAMP signals are temporally and spatially controlled. Since most eukaryotic adenylyl cyclases are integral membrane proteins, often restricted to specific membrane subdomains (10), cAMP signaling is usually initiated at the cell membrane (40). However, diffusion of cAMP away from its site of generation is rapid, with diffusion coefficients being about 400 μm²/s (8, 15, 29), translating into diffusion velocities of 30 to 40 μm/s. As a consequence, the signal would reach the center of the cell with a diameter of 3 μm within less than 50 ms and would rapidly saturate the entire cell. While regulation through fluctuating cellular levels of cAMP represents a valid paradigm of cAMP signaling, it has become clear that other, more localized modes of cAMP signaling must also exist. Several groups have shown that the cAMP response of a given cell can differ depending on what set of receptors activates the cyclase response (14, 30, 41, 42). Similarly, the cAMP response of endothelial cells depends on the subcellular site where the cAMP is produced. They tighten their barrier function when cAMP is produced by membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases but become more permeable when cAMP is produced in the cytoplasm (17, 45). The distinct subcellular localization of cAMP signals was experimentally demonstrated using an array of techniques (29, 40, 55, 56).Physically tethered PDEs might serve to confine newly synthesized cAMP to defined microdomains. Only cAMP-binding proteins that are localized within or extend into such microdomains would be able to receive the cAMP signal (17, 49). cAMP concentrations within such domains might rise and fall rapidly, reaching peak concentrations much more rapidly and locally far beyond the steady-state cAMP levels measured in whole-cell extracts. Such spatially organized, tethered PDEs can generate local sinks into which cAMP disappears (1, 23). This paradigm would allow the simultaneous presence of numerous local cAMP concentration gradients within a single cell, allowing great flexibility in signal generation and intracellular signal transmission. This concept is based on the distinct subcellular localization and physical association of PDEs with subcellular structures and on the existence of localized subcellular cAMP pools, for which there is extensive experimental support (3, 5, 13, 50, 52). Interestingly, PDEs localized in different subcellular regions may still be able to compensate for each other. Ablation of the cilium-specific PDE1C from the olfactory neurons in the mouse did not prolong response termination, as long as the cytoplasmic PDE4 in the cell body was still present (11).The unicellular eukaryote Trypanosoma brucei is the causative agent of human sleeping sickness in sub-Saharan Africa. It belongs to the large order of the kinetoplastida, which includes many medically and economically important pathogens of humans, their livestock, and their crops worldwide (27). Trypanosomes are very small cells (about 15 by 3 μm in diameter) that carry a single flagellum (10 by 0.5 μm). The volume of a procyclic trypanosome of strain 427 is (9.6 ± 0.8) × 10⁻¹⁴ liter (Markus Engstler, personal communication), with the flagellum representing about 15% of this. A signaling threshold concentration of 1 μM cAMP corresponds to just about 30,000 molecules of cAMP per cell. Given a diffusion coefficient of 400 μm²/s (29), unrestricted diffusion of cAMP would swamp the cell within 50 ms. Obviously, temporal and spatial control of cAMP signaling is crucial for T. brucei. Strategically located, physically tethered PDEs might thus play an important role in the architecture of the cAMP signaling pathways in T. brucei.The genomes of T. brucei and of other kinetoplastids, such as T. vivax, T. cruzi, Leishmania major, L. infantum, and L. braziliensis, all code for the same set of five cyclic nucleotide-specific PDEs (25, 53). In T. brucei, the genes for T. brucei PDEB1 (TbrPDEB1; subsequently termed PDEB1) and TbrPDEB2 (PDEB2) are tandemly arranged on chromosome 9 and code for two very similar cAMP-specific PDEs, each with two GAF (mammalian cyclic GMP-dependent PDEs, Anabaena adenylyl cyclases, Escherichia coli FhlA) domains (21) in their N-terminal regions (38, 57). These two PDEs were also studied experimentally in T. cruzi (12) and L. major (24, 52), and orthologues are present in all kinetoplastid genomes available so far. Despite their high overall sequence similarity, PDEB1 and PDEB2 exhibit distinct subcellular localizations (31). PDEB1 is predominantly found in the flagellum, where it is stably associated with cytoskeletal components that are resistant to detergent extraction. In contrast, PDEB2 is mostly localized in the cell body, from where it is fully extractable by nonionic detergents. However, a minor fraction of PDEB2 also associates with the flagellar skeleton in a Triton-resistant manner, most likely through interaction with PDEB1. Earlier work has shown that both PDEB1and PDEB2 are essential enzymes in bloodstream-form T. brucei (31), while TbPDEA, TbPDEC, and TbPDED play minor roles (20; S. Kunz, unpublished data).     

A Small Conserved Domain in the Yeast Spa2p Is Necessary and Sufficient for Its Polarized Localization

SPA2 encodes a yeast protein that is one of the first proteins to localize to sites of polarized growth, such as the shmoo tip and the incipient bud. The dynamics and requirements for Spa2p localization in living cells are examined using Spa2p green fluorescent protein fusions. Spa2p localizes to one edge of unbudded cells and subsequently is observable in the bud tip. Finally, during cytokinesis Spa2p is present as a ring at the mother–daughter bud neck. The bud emergence mutants bem1 and bem2 and mutants defective in the septins do not affect Spa2p localization to the bud tip. Strikingly, a small domain of Spa2p comprised of 150 amino acids is necessary and sufficient for localization to sites of polarized growth. This localization domain and the amino terminus of Spa2p are essential for its function in mating. Searching the yeast genome database revealed a previously uncharacterized protein which we name, Sph1p (Spa2p homolog), with significant homology to the localization domain and amino terminus of Spa2p. This protein also localizes to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells. SPH1, which is similar to SPA2, is required for bipolar budding and plays a role in shmoo formation. Overexpression of either Spa2p or Sph1p can block the localization of either protein fused to green fluorescent protein, suggesting that both Spa2p and Sph1p bind to and are localized by the same component. The identification of a 150–amino acid domain necessary and sufficient for localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth and the existence of this domain in another yeast protein Sph1p suggest that the early localization of these proteins may be mediated by a receptor that recognizes this small domain.Polarized cell growth and division are essential cellular processes that play a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Cell fate can be determined by cell asymmetry during cell division (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Cohen and Hyman, 1994; Rhyu and Knoblich, 1995). Consequently, the molecules involved in the generation and maintenance of cell asymmetry are important in the process of cell fate determination. Polarized growth can occur in response to external signals such as growth towards a nutrient (Rodriguez-Boulan and Nelson, 1989; Eaton and Simons, 1995) or hormone (Jackson and Hartwell, 1990a , b ; Segall, 1993; Keynes and Cook, 1995) and in response to internal signals as in Caenorhabditis elegans (Goldstein et al., 1993; Kimble, 1994; Priess, 1994) and Drosophila melanogaster (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992; Anderson, 1995) early development. Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo polarized growth towards an external cue during mating and to an internal cue during budding. Polarization towards a mating partner (shmoo formation) and towards a new bud site requires a number of proteins (Chenevert, 1994; Chant, 1996; Drubin and Nelson, 1996). Many of these proteins are necessary for both processes and are localized to sites of polarized growth, identified by the insertion of new cell wall material (Tkacz and Lampen, 1972; Farkas et al., 1974; Lew and Reed, 1993) to the shmoo tip, bud tip, and mother–daughter bud neck. In yeast, proteins localized to growth sites include cytoskeletal proteins (Adams and Pringle, 1984; Kilmartin and Adams, 1984; Ford, S.K., and J.R. Pringle. 1986. Yeast. 2:S114; Drubin et al., 1988; Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Amatruda and Cooper, 1992; Lew and Reed, 1993; Waddle et al., 1996), neck filament components (septins) (Byers and Goetsch, 1976; Kim et al., 1991; Ford and Pringle, 1991; Haarer and Pringle, 1987; Longtine et al., 1996), motor proteins (Lillie and Brown, 1994), G-proteins (Ziman, 1993; Yamochi et al., 1994; Qadota et al., 1996), and two membrane proteins (Halme et al., 1996; Roemer et al., 1996; Qadota et al., 1996). Septins, actin, and actin-associated proteins localize early in the cell cycle, before a bud or shmoo tip is recognizable. How this group of proteins is localized to and maintained at sites of cell growth remains unclear.Spa2p is one of the first proteins involved in bud formation to localize to the incipient bud site before a bud is recognizable (Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Chant, 1996). Spa2p has been localized to where a new bud will form at approximately the same time as actin patches concentrate at this region (Snyder et al., 1991). An understanding of how Spa2p localizes to incipient bud sites will shed light on the very early stages of cell polarization. Later in the cell cycle, Spa2p is also found at the mother–daughter bud neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis. Spa2p, a nonessential protein, has been shown to be involved in bud site selection (Snyder, 1989; Zahner et al., 1996), shmoo formation (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990), and mating (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990; Chenevert et al., 1994; Yorihuzi and Ohsumi, 1994; Dorer et al., 1995). Genetic studies also suggest that Spa2p has a role in cytokinesis (Flescher et al., 1993), yet little is known about how this protein is localized to sites of polarized growth.We have used Spa2p green fluorescent protein (GFP)¹ fusions to investigate the early localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth in living cells. Our results demonstrate that a small domain of ∼150 amino acids of this large 1,466-residue protein is sufficient for targeting to sites of polarized growth and is necessary for Spa2p function. Furthermore, we have identified and characterized a novel yeast protein, Sph1p, which has homology to both the Spa2p amino terminus and the Spa2p localization domain. Sph1p localizes to similar regions of polarized growth and sph1 mutants have similar phenotypes as spa2 mutants.     

An Adenylyl Cyclase-mAKAP�� Signaling Complex Regulates cAMP Levels in Cardiac Myocytes

Protein kinase A-anchoring proteins (AKAPs) play important roles in the compartmentation of cAMP signaling, anchoring protein kinase A (PKA) to specific cellular organelles and serving as scaffolds that assemble localized signaling cascades. Although AKAPs have been recently shown to bind adenylyl cyclase (AC), the functional significance of this association has not been studied. In cardiac myocytes, the muscle protein kinase A-anchoring protein β (mAKAPβ) coordinates cAMP-dependent, calcium, and MAP kinase pathways and is important for cellular hypertrophy. We now show that mAKAPβ selectively binds type 5 AC in the heart and that mAKAPβ-associated AC activity is absent in AC5 knock-out hearts. Consistent with its known inhibition by PKA phosphorylation, AC5 is inhibited by association with mAKAPβ-PKA complexes. AC5 binds to a unique N-terminal site on mAKAP-(245–340), and expression of this peptide disrupts endogenous mAKAPβ-AC association. Accordingly, disruption of mAKAPβ-AC5 complexes in neonatal cardiac myocytes results in increased cAMP and hypertrophy in the absence of agonist stimulation. Taken together, these results show that the association of AC5 with the mAKAPβ complex is required for the regulation of cAMP second messenger controlling cardiac myocyte hypertrophy.The formation of multimolecular protein complexes contributes to the specificity of intracellular signaling pathways, including those regulating cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. The cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)³ is targeted to specific intracellular domains by protein kinase A-anchoring proteins (AKAPs) that often serve as scaffolding proteins for diverse signaling enzymes (1). In the heart, global disruption of PKA anchoring affects cardiac contractility, while the inhibited expression of individual AKAPs such as mAKAPβ or AKAP-Lbc attenuates adrenergic-induced hypertrophy of cultured neonatal myocytes (2–4). We have recently shown that specific AKAPs, namely AKAP79 and Yotiao, bind adenylyl cyclases (AC) (5, 6). However, the functional significance of AC-AKAP complexes has not been demonstrated.mAKAPβ, expressed in striated myocytes, is one of two known splice variants encoded by the single mAKAP (AKAP6) gene (7). We previously published that mAKAPβ is primarily localized to the outer membrane of the nuclear envelope via direct binding to nesprin-1α (4, 8). In cardiac myocytes, mAKAPβ serves as the scaffold for a multimolecular signaling complex that in addition to PKA includes the ryanodine receptor (RyR2), the protein phosphatases PP2A and calcineurin, phosphodiesterase 4D3 (PDE4D3), exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac1), ERK5, and MEK5 mitogen-activated protein kinases, molecules implicated in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy (4, 7–13). mAKAPβ complexes facilitate cross-talk between MAP kinase, calcium, and cAMP signaling pathways, permitting feedback inhibition of cAMP levels and the dynamic regulation of PKA and ERK5 activity (4, 9–13). Accordingly, mAKAPβ RNAi attenuates adrenergic and cytokine-induced hypertrophy of cultured rat neonatal ventricular myocytes (4, 11).Because mAKAPβ forms a complex with two cAMP effectors and a metabolizing enzyme for cAMP, we considered whether AC might also be an integral part of the mAKAPβ complex. We now demonstrate that type 5 adenylyl cyclase (AC5) binds directly a unique N-terminal site on mAKAPβ and is the predominant AC isoform associated with mAKAPβ in the heart. We show that AC5 bound to mAKAPβ is inhibited by PKA-dependent negative feedback. Importantly, inhibition of endogenous mAKAPβ-AC5 binding revealed the functional importance of these complexes for the regulation of cAMP-dependent myocyte hypertrophy.