BAK1 and BKK1 regulate brassinosteroid-dependent growth and brassinosteroid-independent cell-death pathways

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are phytosteroid hormones controlling various physiological processes critical for normal growth and development. BRs are perceived by a protein complex containing two transmembrane receptor kinases, BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) and BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (BAK1) [1-3]. BRI1 null mutants exhibit a dwarfed stature with epinastic leaves, delayed senescence, reduced male fertility, and altered light responses. BAK1 null mutants, however, only show a subtle phenotype, suggesting that functionally redundant proteins might be present in the Arabidopsis genome. Here we report that BAK1-LIKE 1 (BKK1) functions redundantly with BAK1 in regulating BR signaling. Surprisingly, rather than the expected bri1-like phenotype, bak1 bkk1 double mutants exhibit a seedling-lethality phenotype due to constitutive defense-gene expression, callose deposition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, and spontaneous cell death even under sterile growing conditions. Our detailed analyses demonstrate that BAK1 and BKK1 have dual physiological roles: positively regulating a BR-dependent plant growth pathway, and negatively regulating a BR-independent cell-death pathway. Both BR signaling and developmentally controlled cell death are critical to optimal plant growth and development, but the mechanisms regulating early events in these pathways are poorly understood. This study provides novel insights into the initiation and crosstalk of the two signaling cascades.     

Genetic evidence for an indispensable role of somatic embryogenesis receptor kinases in brassinosteroid signaling

The Arabidopsis thaliana somatic embryogenesis receptor kinases (SERKs) consist of five members, SERK1 to SERK5, of the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase subfamily II (LRR-RLK II). SERK3 was named BRI1-Associated Receptor Kinase 1 (BAK1) due to its direct interaction with the brassinosteroid (BR) receptor BRI1 in vivo, while SERK4 has also been designated as BAK1-Like 1 (BKK1) for its functionally redundant role with BAK1. Here we provide genetic and biochemical evidence to demonstrate that SERKs are absolutely required for early steps in BR signaling. Overexpression of four of the five SERKs-SERK1, SERK2, SERK3/BAK1, and SERK4/BKK1-suppressed the phenotypes of an intermediate BRI1 mutant, bri1-5. Overexpression of the kinase-dead versions of these four genes in the bri1-5 background, on the other hand, resulted in typical dominant negative phenotypes, resembling those of null BRI1 mutants. We isolated and generated single, double, triple, and quadruple mutants and analyzed their phenotypes in detail. While the quadruple mutant is embryo-lethal, the serk1 bak1 bkk1 triple null mutant exhibits an extreme de-etiolated phenotype similar to a null bri1 mutant. While overexpression of BRI1 can drastically increase hypocotyl growth of wild-type plants, overexpression of BRI1 does not alter hypocotyl growth of the serk1 bak1 bkk1 triple mutant. Biochemical analysis indicated that the phosphorylation level of BRI1 in serk1 bak1 bkk1 is incapable of sensing exogenously applied BR. As a result, the unphosphorylated level of BES1 has lost its sensitivity to the BR treatment in the triple mutant, indicating that the BR signaling pathway has been completely abolished in the triple mutant. These data clearly demonstrate that SERKs are essential to the early events of BR signaling.     

Danger peptide receptor signaling in plants ensures basal immunity upon pathogen‐induced depletion of BAK1

Pathogens infect a host by suppressing defense responses induced upon recognition of microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). Despite this suppression, MAMP receptors mediate basal resistance to limit host susceptibility, via a process that is poorly understood. The Arabidopsis leucine‐rich repeat (LRR) receptor kinase BAK1 associates and functions with different cell surface LRR receptors for a wide range of ligands, including MAMPs. We report that BAK1 depletion is linked to defense activation through the endogenous PROPEP peptides (Pep epitopes) and their LRR receptor kinases PEPR1/PEPR2, despite critical defects in MAMP signaling. In bak1‐knockout plants, PEPR elicitation results in extensive cell death and the prioritization of salicylate‐based defenses over jasmonate‐based defenses, in addition to elevated proligand and receptor accumulation. BAK1 disruption stimulates the release of PROPEP3, produced in response to Pep application and during pathogen challenge, and renders PEPRs necessary for basal resistance. These findings are biologically relevant, since specific BAK1 depletion coincides with PEPR‐dependent resistance to the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. Thus, the PEPR pathway ensures basal resistance when MAMP‐triggered defenses are compromised by BAK1 depletion.     

BRI1/BAK1, a receptor kinase pair mediating brassinosteroid signaling

The Arabidopsis BAK1 (BRI1 Associated receptor Kinase 1) was identified by a yeast two-hybrid screen as a specific interactor for BRI1, a critical component of a membrane brassinosteroid (BR) receptor. In yeast, BAK1/BRI1 interaction activates their kinase activities through transphosphorylation. BAK1 and BRI1 share similar gene expression and subcellular localization patterns and physically associate with each other in plants. Overexpression of the BAK1 gene leads to a phenotype reminiscent of BRI1-overexpression transgenic plants and rescues a weak bri1 mutant. In contrast, a bak1 knockout mutation gives rise to a weak bri1-like phenotype and enhances a weak bri1 mutation. We propose that BAK1 and BRI1 function together to mediate plant steroid signaling.     

Receptor-like protein kinases,BAK1 and BKK1, regulate a light-dependent cell-death control pathway

BAK1 and BKK1 are two functionally redundant leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinases (LRR-RLKs) involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction by their direct interactions with the BR receptor, BRI1. Recent studies from our group and others indicated that the two RLKs also play critical roles in regulating pathogen-related and pathogen-unrelated cell-death controls. Genetic data suggest that the two kinases are essential for plant survival because the double mutants show spontaneous cell-death and seedling lethality phenotypes. Physiological analyses further suggest that the cell-death of the double mutant is triggered by the light, as dark-grown seedlings do not show any cell-death symptoms. These observations indicate that BAK1 and BKK1 regulate a novel signaling pathway to detoxify or to limit the production of a yet unknown toxin/toxins produced by plants under light conditions.Key words: receptor-like kinases, cell-death, light, reactive oxygen speciesPlant receptor-like protein kinases (RLKs) are transmembrane proteins essential for cell-to-cell communications. A typical RLK is composed of a cell-surface receptor domain which can sense and perceive diversified signaling molecules within the extracellular space, a transmembrane domain anchoring the protein to the plasma membrane, and a cytoplasmic kinase domain whose activity can often be regulated by the conformation change in the receptor domain upon the binding of the signaling molecules to the receptor. The unique structure of RLKs suggests that these kinases may act as key switches in triggering many signal transduction cascades which greatly influence plant growth and development. Recent studies support this notion, as the functions of more and more RLKs have been revealed, and these RLKs indeed play critical roles in mediating many physiological processes such as steroidal hormone action, pathogenesis responses, and recognition of various peptide signals.^1–3 There are more than 600 RLKs in the Arabidopsis genome.^4,5 Based on the structure of the receptor domains, RLKs can be divided into more than 10 subfamilies. Among them, LRR-RLKs belong to the largest group consisting of at least 220 members. The functions of only a small fraction of RLKs have been revealed.BAK1 is a typical LRR-RLK, identified via an activation tagging genetic screen for suppressors of a weak BR receptor (BRI1) mutant called bri1–5, and via a yeast two-hybrid screen for BRI1 kinase domain physical interactors.^6,7 Although the detailed molecular mechanisms of BAK1 in activating the BR signaling pathway is still mysterious, the in vivo interaction between BAK1 and BRI1 is clearly ligand (BR)-dependent.⁸ The mutual phosphorylation of the two kinases is also BR-dependent.⁸ BKK1, the closest homolog of BAK1, was identified as a functionally redundant protein of BAK1.⁹ Interestingly, the double null mutant of BAK1 and BKK1, bak1–4 bkk1-1, did not show a typical bri1 phenotype but showed a spontaneous cell-death phenotype under a normal growth condition. This unexpected result suggests that BAK1 and BKK1 may have more roles than their functions in BR signal transduction. This hypothesis is supported by the recent discovery of BAK1 in mediating pathogen-related signaling pathways in order to regulate innate immunity and cell-death control.^10–12 The spontaneous cell-death seen in the bak1–4 bkk1-1 double mutant, however, is not caused by the challenges from pathogens;¹⁰ it is also unlikely to be the result from the disruption of the FLS2-dependent innate immunity pathway,^11,12 as overexpression or T-DNA disruption of the RLK gene, FLS2, does not show a phenotype similar to that of the bak1–4 bkk1-1 double mutant. In addition, the cell-death phenotype of the double mutant occurs even in a sterile growth condition, suggesting that the pathogens are not the key triggers of cell-death in the bak1–4 bkk1-1 double mutant. Early results indicated that the double mutant seedlings are indistinguishable from the wild-type seedlings during the first 4–5 days after germination but quickly show terminating growth and cotyledon necrosis phenotypes a week after germination.⁹ This observation prompted a test of whether light is a true trigger for cell-death seen in the double mutant. Both wild-type and the double mutant were planted in the dark and long-day lighting conditions. Cotyledons from eight-day-old seedlings were stained with Trypan blue to examine cell-death symptoms of the seedlings grown under different illumination conditions.¹³ Both the dark-grown wild-type and the double mutant seedlings showed no cell-death symptoms on their cotyledons at any time during a three-week experimental period (Fig. 1A and B). Under a long-day lighting condition, on the other hand, cotyledons from the double mutant, but not from the wild-type, exhibited severe cell-death symptoms (Fig. 1C and D). Three weeks after germination, the double mutant seedlings growing under a long-day lighting condition was completely dead, the ones under the dark condition were still healthy and showed no cell-death symptoms (data not shown).Open in a separate windowFigure 1BAK1 and BKK1 regulate a light-dependent cell-death control pathway. (A) A representative Trypan blue stained wild-type cotyledon from a dark grown seedling on a ½ MS plate; (B) A representative Trypan blue stained bak1–4 bkk1-1 cotyledon from a dark grown seedling on a ½ MS plate; (C) A representative Trypan blue stained wild-type cotyledon from a long-day light-grown seedling on a ½ MS plate; (D) A representative Trypan blue stained bak1–4 bkk1-1 cotyledon from a long-day light-grown seedling on a ½ MS plate; (E) A hypothetical model of BAK1 and BKK1 in regulating both the BR signaling pathway to promote cell growth, and a novel light-dependent cell-death control pathway to prevent plants from unnecessary cell-death. Under a light condition, plants naturally produce unknown toxins (phototoxins), whose accumulation can lead to the cell-death. BAK1 and BKK1 likely mediate a signaling pathway to constantly check and limit the levels of these toxins.Based on our current results, it is apparent that the double mutant is more vulnerable to light. It is probable that the mutant lost its capability to detoxify or to restrict the production of an unknown toxin/toxins naturally generated by plants under a light condition. The wild-type plants may also produce the toxin/toxins, but BAK1 and BKK1 can direct a signal transduction pathway to constantly check and eliminate extra amount of the toxin/toxins (Fig. 1E). Under a sterile growth condition, BAK1 and BKK1 are likely involved in both the BR signaling pathway to positively regulate cell growth and in a novel pathway to negatively control cell-death. Under normal environmental conditions (not sterile condition), BAK1 might also be recruited to participate in the innate immunity pathway via its interaction with FLS2 and other RLKs. Based on the model from the BRI1/BAK1 signal transduction, there might be another RLK which can pair with BAK1 or BKK1 in controlling the light-dependent cell-death process. An unknown “survival signal” could be an unknown metabolite or the toxin/toxins causing the cell-death. Under the current model, the “survival signal” may activate the BAK1- and BKK1-associated stress defense pathway and constantly check the levels of the light-dependent toxin/toxins in the plants. The homeostasis of the toxin/toxins is therefore strictly under control. If both BAK1 and BKK1 are removed, as in the case of the double mutant, the plant loses its capability to check the levels of the toxin/toxins. The uncontrolled accumulation of the toxin/toxins is likely the ultimate cause of the spontaneous cell-death observed in the double mutant.     

Overexpression of miR172 suppresses the brassinosteroid signaling defects of bak1 in Arabidopsis

BRI1-Associated Receptor Kinase 1 (BAK1) is a leucine-rich repeat serine/threonine receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) that is involved in multiple developmental pathways, such as brassinosteroid (BR) signaling, plant immunity and cell death control in plants. Because the roundish and compact rosette leaves of bak1 mutant plants are characteristic phenotypes for deficient BR signaling, we screened genetic suppressors of bak1 according to changes in leaf shape to identify new components that may be involved in BAK1-mediated BR signaling using the activation-tagging method. Here, we report bak1-SUP1, which exhibited longer and narrower rosette leaves and an increased BR sensitivity compared with those of bak1. Analyses of the T-DNA insertional site and the gene expression that was affected by the T-DNA insertion revealed that a microRNA, namely, miR172, over-accumulates in bak1-SUP1. Detailed phenotypic analyses of bak1-SUP1 and a single mutant in which the bak1 mutation was segregated out (miR172-D) revealed that the overexpression of miR172 promotes leaf length elongation in adult plants and increases the root and hypocotyl growth during the seedling stage compared with that of wild type plants. Taken together with its increased BR sensitivity, these results suggest that miR172 regulates vegetative growth patterns by modulating BR sensitivity as well as by the previously identified developmental phase transition.     

The BRI1-associated kinase 1, BAK1, has a brassinolide-independent role in plant cell-death control

Programmed cell death (PCD) is a common host response to microbial infection [1-3]. In plants, PCD is associated with immunity to biotrophic pathogens, but it can also promote disease upon infection by necrotrophic pathogens [4]. Therefore, plant cell-suicide programs must be strictly controlled. Here we demonstrate that the Arabidopsis thaliana Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1 (BRI1)-associated receptor Kinase 1 (BAK1), which operates as a coreceptor of BRI1 in brassinolide (BL)-dependent plant development, also regulates the containment of microbial infection-induced cell death. BAK1-deficient plants develop spreading necrosis upon infection. This is accompanied by production of reactive oxygen intermediates and results in enhanced susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. The exogenous application of BL rescues growth defects of bak1 mutants but fails to restore immunity to fungal infection. Moreover, BL-insensitive and -deficient mutants do not exhibit spreading necrosis or enhanced susceptibility to fungal infections. Together, these findings suggest that plant steroid-hormone signaling is dispensable for the containment of infection-induced PCD. We propose a novel, BL-independent function of BAK1 in plant cell-death control that is distinct from its BL-dependent role in plant development.     

The Pseudomonas syringae effector HopF2 suppresses Arabidopsis immunity by targeting BAK1

Pseudomonas syringae delivers a plethora of effector proteins into host cells to sabotage immune responses and modulate physiology to favor infection. The P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 effector HopF2 suppresses Arabidopsis innate immunity triggered by multiple microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMP) at the plasma membrane. We show here that HopF2 possesses distinct mechanisms for suppression of two branches of MAMP‐activated MAP kinase (MAPK) cascades. In addition to blocking MKK5 (MAPK kinase 5) activation in the MEKK1 (MAPK kinase kinase 1)/MEKKs–MKK4/5–MPK3/6 cascade, HopF2 targets additional component(s) upstream of MEKK1 in the MEKK1–MKK1/2–MPK4 cascade and the plasma membrane‐localized receptor‐like cytoplasmic kinase BIK1 and its homologs. We further show that HopF2 directly targets BAK1, a plasma membrane‐localized receptor‐like kinase that is involved in multiple MAMP signaling. The interaction between BAK1 and HopF2 and between two other P. syringae effectors, AvrPto and AvrPtoB, was confirmed in vivo and in vitro. Consistent with BAK1 as a physiological target of AvrPto, AvrPtoB and HopF2, the strong growth defects or lethality associated with ectopic expression of these effectors in wild‐type Arabidopsis transgenic plants were largely alleviated in bak1 mutant plants. Thus, our results provide genetic evidence to show that BAK1 is a physiological target of AvrPto, AvrPtoB and HopF2. Identification of BAK1 as an additional target of HopF2 virulence not only explains HopF2 suppression of multiple MAMP signaling at the plasma membrane, but also supports the notion that pathogen virulence effectors act through multiple targets in host cells.     

A missense mutation in CHS1, a TIR‐NB protein,induces chilling sensitivity in Arabidopsis

Low temperature is an environmental factor that affects plant growth and development and plant–pathogen interactions. How temperature regulates plant defense responses is not well understood. In this study, we characterized chilling‐sensitive mutant 1 (chs1), and functionally analyzed the role of the CHS1 gene in plant responses to chilling stress. The chs1 mutant displayed a chilling‐sensitive phenotype, and also displayed defense‐associated phenotypes, including extensive cell death, the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and salicylic acid, and an increased expression of PR genes: these phenotypes indicated that the mutation in chs1 activates the defense responses under chilling stress. A map‐based cloning analysis revealed that CHS1 encodes a TIR‐NB‐type protein. The chilling sensitivity of chs1 was fully rescued by pad4 and eds1, but not by ndr1. The overexpression of the TIR and NB domains can suppress the chs1–conferred phenotypes. Interestingly, the stability of the CHS1 protein was positively regulated by low temperatures independently of the 26S proteasome pathway. This study revealed the role of a TIR‐NB‐type gene in plant growth and cell death under chilling stress, and suggests that temperature modulates the stability of the TIR‐NB protein in Arabidopsis.     

BAK7 displays unequal genetic redundancy with BAK1 in brassinosteroid signaling and early senescence in arabidopsis

BRI1-Associated kinase1 (BAK1), a five leucine-rich-repeat containing receptor-like serine/threonine kinase, has been shown to have dual functions: mediating brassinosteroid (BR) signaling and acting in the BR-independent plant defense response. Sequence analysis has revealed that BAK1 has two homologs, BAK7 and BAK8. Because BAK8 deviates from the canonical RD kinase motif, we focused on the functional analysis of BAK7. The expression pattern and tissues in which BAK7 appeared partially overlapped with those observed for BAK1. Expression levels of BAK7 increased in the bak1 mutant. Overexpression of BAK7 rescued the bri1 mutant phenotype, indicating that BAK7 can compensate for BAK1 in BR-mediated processes, especially in the absence of BAK1. However, root and hypocotyl elongation patterns of transgenic plants overexpressing BAK1 or BAK7 appeared to be different from the patterns observed in a BRI1 overexpressor. Furthermore, the sensitivity of transgenic plants overexpressing BAK7 to brassinazole, a biosynthetic inhibitor of brassinolide (BL), did not change compared to that of wild-type plants. In addition, we generated transgenic plants expressing BAK7 RNA interference constructs and found severe growth retardation and early senescence in these lines. Taken together, these results suggest that BAK7 is a component of the BR signaling pathway, with varying degrees of genetic redundancy with BAK1, and that it affects plant growth via BL-independent pathways in vivo.     

BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase,interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling

Brassinosteroids regulate plant growth and development through a protein complex that includes the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase (LRR-RLK) brassinosteroid-insensitive 1 (BRI1). Activation tagging was used to identify a dominant genetic suppressor of bri1, bak1-1D (bri1-associated receptor kinase 1-1Dominant), which encodes an LRR-RLK, distinct from BRI1. Overexpression of BAK1 results in elongated organ phenotypes, while a null allele of BAK1 displays a semidwarfed phenotype and has reduced sensitivity to brassinosteroids (BRs). BAK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase, and BRI1 and BAK1 interact in vitro and in vivo. Expression of a dominant-negative mutant allele of BAK1 causes a severe dwarf phenotype, resembling the phenotype of null bri1 alleles. These results indicate BAK1 is a component of BR signaling.     

The tomato I gene for Fusarium wilt resistance encodes an atypical leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like protein whose function is nevertheless dependent on SOBIR1 and SERK3/BAK1

We have identified the tomato I gene for resistance to the Fusarium wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) and show that it encodes a membrane‐anchored leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like protein (LRR‐RLP). Unlike most other LRR‐RLP genes involved in plant defence, the I gene is not a member of a gene cluster and contains introns in its coding sequence. The I gene encodes a loopout domain larger than those in most other LRR‐RLPs, with a distinct composition rich in serine and threonine residues. The I protein also lacks a basic cytosolic domain. Instead, this domain is rich in aromatic residues that could form a second transmembrane domain. The I protein recognises the Fol Avr1 effector protein, but, unlike many other LRR‐RLPs, recognition specificity is determined in the C‐terminal half of the protein by polymorphic amino acid residues in the LRRs just preceding the loopout domain and in the loopout domain itself. Despite these differences, we show that I/Avr1‐dependent necrosis in Nicotiana benthamiana depends on the LRR receptor‐like kinases (RLKs) SERK3/BAK1 and SOBIR1. Sequence comparisons revealed that the I protein and other LRR‐RLPs involved in plant defence all carry residues in their last LRR and C‐terminal LRR capping domain that are conserved with SERK3/BAK1‐interacting residues in the same relative positions in the LRR‐RLKs BRI1 and PSKR1. Tyrosine mutations of two of these conserved residues, Q922 and T925, abolished I/Avr1‐dependent necrosis in N. benthamiana, consistent with similar mutations in BRI1 and PSKR1 preventing their interaction with SERK3/BAK1.     

Brassinosteroid-independent functions of the BRI1-associated kinase BAK1/SERK3

Eukaryotes have evolved programmed cell death (PCD) mechanisms that play important roles in both, development and immunity.^1–3 We demonstrated a requirement for the Arabidopsis thaliana leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK), BAK1/SERK3 (BRI1-Associated receptor Kinase 1/Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor Kinase 3) in regulating the containment of microbial infection-induced necrosis. BAK1-deficient plants showed constitutive expression of defense-related genes and developed spreading cell death upon infection by necrotizing pathogens that result in enhanced susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens. This reaction was not inducible by exposition of bak1 mutants to general stresses but appeared to be solely inducible by necrotizing pathogen infection. BAK1 is known to interact with the brassinosteroid receptor, BRI1, and thereby facilitates plant growth and development in a brassinolide (BL)-dependent manner.^4,5 Surprisingly, the cell death-related phenotype in bak1 mutants is brassinolide-independent. In this addendum we want to present recent new data on BAK1 and discuss its role as a general regulator in plant processes being as diverse as brassinosteroid signaling in development, perception of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and cell-death control in innate immunity.Key words: LRR-RLK, cell-death control, immunity, brassinosteroids, BAK1, SERK3, BRI1, FLS2     

Phosphorylation-dependent differential regulation of plant growth, cell death, and innate immunity by the regulatory receptor-like kinase BAK1

Plants rely heavily on receptor-like kinases (RLKs) for perception and integration of external and internal stimuli. The Arabidopsis regulatory leucine-rich repeat RLK (LRR-RLK) BAK1 is involved in steroid hormone responses, innate immunity, and cell death control. Here, we describe the differential regulation of three different BAK1-dependent signaling pathways by a novel allele of BAK1, bak1-5. Innate immune signaling mediated by the BAK1-dependent RKs FLS2 and EFR is severely compromised in bak1-5 mutant plants. However, bak1-5 mutants are not impaired in BR signaling or cell death control. We also show that, in contrast to the RD kinase BRI1, the non-RD kinases FLS2 and EFR have very low kinase activity, and we show that neither was able to trans-phosphorylate BAK1 in vitro. Furthermore, kinase activity for all partners is completely dispensable for the ligand-induced heteromerization of FLS2 or EFR with BAK1 in planta, revealing another pathway specific mechanistic difference. The specific suppression of FLS2- and EFR-dependent signaling in bak1-5 is not due to a differential interaction of BAK1-5 with the respective ligand-binding RK but requires BAK1-5 kinase activity. Overall our results demonstrate a phosphorylation-dependent differential control of plant growth, innate immunity, and cell death by the regulatory RLK BAK1, which may reveal key differences in the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of ligand-binding RD and non-RD RKs.     

Specifying the role of BAK1‐interacting receptor‐like kinase 3 in brassinosteroid signaling

Brassinosteroids (BR) are involved in the control of several developmental processes ranging from root elongation to senescence and adaptation to environmental cues. Thus, BR perception and signaling have to be precisely regulated. One regulator is BRI1‐associated kinase 1 (BAK1)‐interacting receptor‐like kinase 3 (BIR3). In the absence of BR, BIR3 forms complexes with BR insensitive 1 (BRI1) and BAK1. However, the biophysical and energetic requirements for complex formation in the absence of the ligand have yet to be determined. Using computational modeling, we simulated the potential complexes between the cytoplasmic domains of BAK1, BRI1 and BIR3. Our calculations and experimental data confirm the interaction of BIR3 with BAK1 and BRI1, with the BAK1 BIR3 interaction clearly favored. Furthermore, we demonstrate that BIR3 and BRI1 share the same interaction site with BAK1. This suggests a competition between BIR3 and BRI1 for binding to BAK1, which results in preferential binding of BIR3 to BAK1 in the absence of the ligand thereby preventing the active participation of BAK1 in BR signaling. Our model also suggests that BAK1 and BRI1 can interact even while BAK1 is in complex with BIR3 at an additional binding site of BAK1 that does not allow active BR signaling.     

Dissecting virulence function from recognition: cell death suppression in Nicotiana benthamiana by XopQ/HopQ1‐family effectors relies on EDS1‐dependent immunity

Many Gram‐negative plant pathogenic bacteria express effector proteins of the XopQ/HopQ1 family which are translocated into plant cells via the type III secretion system during infection. In Nicotiana benthamiana, recognition of XopQ/HopQ1 proteins induces an effector‐triggered immunity (ETI) reaction which is not associated with strong cell death but renders plants immune against Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strains. Additionally, XopQ suppresses cell death in N. benthamiana when transiently co‐expressed with cell death inducers. Here, we show that representative XopQ/HopQ1 proteins are recognized similarly, likely by a single resistance protein of the TIR‐NB‐LRR class. Extensive analysis of XopQ derivatives indicates the recognition of structural features. We performed Agrobacterium‐mediated protein expression experiments in wild‐type and EDS1‐deficient (eds1) N. benthamiana leaves, not recognizing XopQ/HopQ1. XopQ recognition limits multiplication of Agrobacterium and attenuates levels of transiently expressed proteins. Remarkably, XopQ fails to suppress cell death reactions induced by different effectors in eds1 plants. We conclude that XopQ‐mediated cell death suppression in N. benthamiana is due to the attenuation of Agrobacterium‐mediated protein expression rather than the cause of the genuine XopQ virulence activity. Thus, our study expands our understanding of XopQ recognition and function, and also challenges the commonly used co‐expression assays for elucidation of in planta effector activities, at least under conditions of ETI induction.     

Receptor‐Like Kinase Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis Heterotrimeric G‐Protein Gα ‐Subunit AtGPA1

As molecular on–off switches, heterotrimeric G protein complexes, comprised of a Gα subunit and an obligate Gβγ dimer, transmit extracellular signals received by G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) to cytoplasmic targets that respond to biotic and abiotic stimuli. Signal transduction is modulated by phosphorylation of GPCRs and G protein complexes. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the Gα subunit AtGPA1 is phosphorylated by the receptor‐like kinase (RLK) BRI1‐associated Kinase 1 (BAK1), but the extent that other RLKs phosphorylates AtGPA1 is unknown. Twenty‐two trans‐phosphorylation sites on AtGPA1 are mapped by 12 RLKs hypothesized to act in the Arabidopsis G protein signaling pathway. Cis‐phosphorylation sites are also identified on these RLKs, some newly shown to be dual specific kinases. Multiple sites are present in the core AtGPA1 functional units, including pSer52 and/or pThr53 of the conserved P‐loop that directly binds nucleotide/phosphate, pThr164, and pSer175 from αE helix in the intramolecular domain interface for nucleotide exchange and GTP hydrolysis, and pThr193 and/or pThr194 in Switch I (SwI) that coordinates nucleotide exchange and protein partner binding. Several AtGPA1 S/T phosphorylation sites are potentially nucleotide‐dependent phosphorylation patterns, such as Ser52/Thr53 in the P‐loop and Thr193 and/or Thr194 in SwI.     

The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens

Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by surface-localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) constitutes an important layer of innate immunity in plants. The leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor kinases EF-TU RECEPTOR (EFR) and FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2) are the PRRs for the peptide PAMPs elf18 and flg22, which are derived from bacterial EF-Tu and flagellin, respectively. Using coimmunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analyses, we demonstrated that EFR and FLS2 undergo ligand-induced heteromerization in planta with several LRR receptor-like kinases that belong to the SOMATIC-EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE (SERK) family, including BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED KINASE1/SERK3 (BAK1/SERK3) and BAK1-LIKE1/SERK4 (BKK1/SERK4). Using a novel bak1 allele that does not exhibit pleiotropic defects in brassinosteroid and cell death responses, we determined that BAK1 and BKK1 cooperate genetically to achieve full signaling capability in response to elf18 and flg22 and to the damage-associated molecular pattern AtPep1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that BAK1 and BKK1 contribute to disease resistance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae and the obligate biotrophic oomycete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Our work reveals that the establishment of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) relies on the rapid ligand-induced recruitment of multiple SERKs within PRR complexes and provides insight into the early PTI signaling events underlying this important layer of plant innate immunity.     

Immune responses induced by oligogalacturonides are differentially affected by AvrPto and loss of BAK1/BKK1 and PEPR1/PEPR2

Plants possess an innate immune system capable of restricting invasion by most potential pathogens. At the cell surface, the recognition of microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and/or damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) represents the first event for the prompt mounting of an effective immune response. Pathogens have evolved effectors that block MAMP‐triggered immunity. The Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPto abolishes immunity triggered by the peptide MAMPs flg22 and elf18, derived from the bacterial flagellin and elongation factor Tu, respectively, by inhibiting the kinase function of the corresponding receptors FLS2 and EFR, as well as their co‐receptors BAK1 and BKK1. Oligogalacturonides (OGs), a well‐known class of DAMPs, are oligomers of α‐1,4‐linked galacturonosyl residues, released on partial degradation of the plant cell wall homogalacturonan. We show here that AvrPto affects only a subset of the OG‐triggered immune responses and that, among these responses, only a subset is affected by the concomitant loss of BAK1 and BKK1. However, the antagonistic effect on auxin‐related responses is not affected by either AvrPto or the loss of BAK1/BKK1. These observations reveal an unprecedented complexity among the MAMP/DAMP response cascades. We also show that the signalling system mediated by Peps, another class of DAMPs, and their receptors PEPRs, contributes to OG‐activated immunity. We hypothesize that OGs are sensed through multiple and partially redundant perception/transduction complexes, some targeted by AvrPto, but not necessarily comprising BAK1 and BKK1.