The Escherichia coli SRP and SecB targeting pathways converge at the translocon.

Two distinct protein targeting pathways can direct proteins to the Escherichia coli inner membrane. The Sec pathway involves the cytosolic chaperone SecB that binds to the mature region of pre-proteins. SecB targets the pre-protein to SecA that mediates pre-protein translocation through the SecYEG translocon. The SRP pathway is probably used primarily for the targeting and assembly of inner membrane proteins. It involves the signal recognition particle (SRP) that interacts with the hydrophobic targeting signal of nascent proteins. By using a protein cross-linking approach, we demonstrate here that the SRP pathway delivers nascent inner membrane proteins at the membrane. The SRP receptor FtsY, GTP and inner membranes are required for release of the nascent proteins from the SRP. Upon release of the SRP at the membrane, the targeted nascent proteins insert into a translocon that contains at least SecA, SecY and SecG. Hence, as appears to be the case for several other translocation systems, multiple targeting mechanisms deliver a variety of precursor proteins to a common membrane translocation complex of the E.coli inner membrane.     

信号识别颗粒(SRP)在膜蛋白定位中的作用

依赖信号识别颗粒(signal recognition particle,SRP)的共翻译转运是所有生命体中的一个保守途径,它将新生肽链的翻译与转运耦联在一起。超过30%的新合成的多肽链被SRP转运到正确位置。最近的研究表明,大肠杆菌中SRP抑制子可以规避SRP的需求。当SRP缺失时,翻译控制在介导膜蛋白定位方面起着关键作用。本综述总结了SRP底物如何在存在或缺失SRP的情况下转运到适当的位置以及翻译速率降低如何补偿SRP的缺失。我们还讨论了不同蛋白质对SRP的依赖程度。这一回顾将为进一步研究SRP功能及膜蛋白定位提供新思路。     

Targeting proteins to membranes: structure of the signal recognition particle

In all three kingdoms of life, co-translational targeting of secretory and membrane proteins to the prokaryotic plasma membrane or eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein complex, the signal recognition particle (SRP), and its membrane-associated receptor (SR). SRP binds to signal sequences of nascent proteins as they emerge from the exit tunnel of the ribosome. The resulting targeting complex, composed of the SRP and the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC), then docks with the SR in a GTP-dependent manner. Passing through a complex series of conformational states, SRP and SR deliver the RNC to the translocon, which in turn mediates protein translocation across or integration into the membrane. The core structural and mechanistic principles of SRP-dependent protein targeting are universally conserved. Recent structural investigations combining X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy have provided new insights into three essentials steps of the SRP-dependent protein targeting cycle: the assembly and interaction of the SRP ribonucleoprotein core, the GTP-dependent SRP-SR association, and the interaction between SRP and the ribosome.     

The structural basis of protein targeting and translocation in bacteria

In Gram-negative bacteria, two distinct targeting routes assist in the proper localization of secreted and membrane proteins. Signal recognition particle (SRP) mainly targets ribosome-bound nascent membrane proteins, whereas SecB facilitates the targeting of periplasmic and outer membrane proteins. These routes converge at the translocase, a protein-conducting pore in the membrane that consists of the SecYEG complex associated with the peripheral ATPase, SecA. Recent structural studies of the targeting and the translocating components provide insights into how substrates are recognized and suggest a mechanism by which proteins are transported through an aqueous pore in the cytoplasmic membrane.     

Co-translational Folding Intermediate Dictates Membrane Targeting of the Signal Recognition Particle Receptor

Much of our knowledge on the function of proteins is deduced from their mature, folded states. However, it is unknown whether partially synthesized nascent protein segments can execute biological functions during translation and whether their premature folding states matter. A recent observation that a nascent chain performs a distinct function, co-translational targeting in vivo, has been made with the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle receptor FtsY, a major player in the conserved pathway of membrane protein biogenesis. FtsY functions as a membrane-associated entity, but very little is known about the mode of its targeting to the membrane. Here we investigated the underlying structural mechanism of the co-translational FtsY targeting to the membrane. Our results show that helices N_2–4, which mediate membrane targeting, form a stable folding intermediate co-translationally that greatly differs from its fold in the mature FtsY. These results thus resolve a long-standing mystery of how the receptor targets the membrane even when deleted of its alleged membrane targeting sequence. The structurally distinct targeting determinant of FtsY exists only co-translationally. Our studies will facilitate further efforts to seek cellular factors required for proper targeting and association of FtsY with the membrane. Moreover, the results offer a hallmark example for how co-translational nascent intermediates may dictate biological functions.     

The signal sequence receptor, unlike the signal recognition particle receptor, is not essential for protein translocation

Detergent extracts of canine pancreas rough microsomal membranes were depleted of either the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), which mediates the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of the ribosome/nascent chain complex to the membrane, or the signal sequence receptor (SSR), which has been proposed to function as a membrane bound receptor for the newly targeted nascent chain and/or as a component of a multi-protein translocation complex responsible for transfer of the nascent chain across the membrane. Depletion of the two components was performed by chromatography of detergent extracts on immunoaffinity supports. Detergent extracts lacking either SR or SSR were reconstituted and assayed for activity with respect to SR dependent elongation arrest release, nascent chain targeting, ribosome binding, secretory precursor translocation, and membrane protein integration. Depletion of SR resulted in the loss of elongation arrest release activity, nascent chain targeting, secretory protein translocation, and membrane protein integration, although ribosome binding was unaffected. Full activity was restored by addition of immunoaffinity purified SR before reconstitution of the detergent extract. Surprisingly, depletion of SSR was without effect on any of the assayed activities, indicating that SSR is either not required for translocation or is one of a family of functionally redundant components.     

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex stimulates protein import into yeast mitochondria

To identify yeast cytosolic proteins that mediate targeting of precursor proteins to mitochondria, we developed an in vitro import system consisting of purified yeast mitochondria and a radiolabeled mitochondrial precursor protein whose C terminus was still attached to the ribosome. In this system, the N terminus of the nascent chain was translocated across both mitochondrial membranes, generating a translocation intermediate spanning both membranes. The nascent chain could then be completely chased into the mitochondrial matrix after release from the ribosome. Generation of this import intermediate was dependent on a mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial surface proteins, and was stimulated by proteins that could be released from the ribosomes by high salt. The major salt-released stimulatory factor was yeast nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC). Purified NAC fully restored import of salt-washed ribosome-bound nascent chains by enhancing productive binding of the chains to mitochondria. We propose that ribosome-associated NAC facilitates recognition of nascent precursor chains by the mitochondrial import machinery.     

Fluorescence-based methods to image palmitoylated proteins

A well known function of palmitoylation is to promote protein binding to cell membranes. Until recently, it was unclear what additional roles, if any, palmitoylation has in controlling protein localization in cells. Recent studies of palmitoylated forms of the small GTPase Ras have now revealed that palmitoylation plays multiple roles in the regulation of protein trafficking, including targeting proteins into the secretory pathway and recycling proteins between the plasma membrane and Golgi complex. We here describe how quantitative fluorescence microscopy and photobleaching approaches can be used to study the intracellular targeting and trafficking of GFP-tagged palmitoylated proteins in living cells. We discuss (1) general considerations for fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurements of GFP-tagged proteins; (2) FRAP-based assays to test the strength of binding of palmitoylated proteins to cell membranes; (3) methods to establish the kinetics and mechanisms of recycling of palmitoylated proteins between the Golgi complex and the plasma membrane; (4) the use of the palmitoylation inhibitor 2-bromo-palmitate as a tool to study the dynamic regulation of protein targeting and trafficking by palmitate turnover.     

The signal recognition particle and its interactions during protein targeting

The synthesis of secretory or integral membrane proteins can be directly coupled to their translocation across or insertion into membranes. In co-translational targeting, the translation machine, the ribosome, is transferred to the respective membrane by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) as soon as a signal sequence emerges. Protein synthesis can continue at the membrane, with the nascent peptide chain directly inserting into the ribosome-bound protein-conducting channel, the Sec61 complex. During the past two years, several structures have been solved by crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy that represent distinct functional states of the SRP cycle. On this basis, the first structure-based models can be suggested that explain important aspects of protein targeting, such as the SRP-ribosome and SRP-SR interactions.     

Signal Recognition Particle and SecA Cooperate during Export of Secretory Proteins with Highly Hydrophobic Signal Sequences

The Sec translocon of bacterial plasma membranes mediates the linear translocation of secretory proteins as well as the lateral integration of membrane proteins. Integration of many membrane proteins occurs co-translationally via the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of ribosome-associated nascent chains to the Sec translocon. In contrast, translocation of classical secretory proteins across the Sec translocon is a post-translational event requiring no SRP but the motor protein SecA. Secretory proteins were, however, reported to utilize SRP in addition to SecA, if the hydrophobicity of their signal sequences exceeds a certain threshold value. Here we have analyzed transport of this subgroup of secretory proteins across the Sec translocon employing an entirely defined in vitro system. We thus found SecA to be both necessary and sufficient for translocation of secretory proteins with hydrophobic signal sequences, whereas SRP and its receptor improved translocation efficiency. This SRP-mediated boost of translocation is likely due to the early capture of the hydrophobic signal sequence by SRP as revealed by site-specific photo cross-linking of ribosome nascent chain complexes.     

SecA is not required for signal recognition particle-mediated targeting and initial membrane insertion of a nascent inner membrane protein.

In Escherichia coli, signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of inner membrane proteins has been described. In vitro cross-linking studies have demonstrated that short nascent chains exposing a highly hydrophobic targeting signal interact with the SRP. This SRP, assisted by its receptor, FtsY, mediates the transfer to a common translocation site in the inner membrane that contains SecA, SecG, and SecY. Here we describe a further in vitro reconstitution of SRP-mediated membrane insertion in which purified ribosome-nascent chain-SRP complexes are targeted to the purified SecYEG complex contained in proteoliposomes in a process that requires the SRP-receptor FtsY and GTP. We found that in this system SecA and ATP are dispensable for both the transfer of the nascent inner membrane protein FtsQ to SecY and its stable membrane insertion. Release of the SRP from nascent FtsQ also occurred in the absence of SecYEG complex indicating a functional interaction of FtsY with lipids. These data suggest that SRP/FtsY and SecB/SecA constitute distinct targeting routes.     

Characterization of the targeting signal of the Arabidopsis 22-kD integral peroxisomal membrane protein

Using a combination of in vivo and in vitro assays, we characterized the sorting pathway and molecular targeting signal for the Arabidopsis 22-kD peroxisome membrane protein (PMP22), an integral component of the membrane of all peroxisomes in the mature plant. We show that nascent PMP22 is sorted directly from the cytosol to peroxisomes and that it is inserted into the peroxisomal boundary membrane with its N- and C-termini facing the cytosol. This direct sorting of PMP22 to peroxisomes contrasts with the indirect sorting reported previously for cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum) ascorbate peroxidase, an integral PMP that sorts to peroxisomes via a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, at least two different sorting pathways for PMPs exist in plant cells. At least four distinct regions within the N-terminal one-half of PMP22, including a positively charged domain present in most peroxisomal integral membrane-destined proteins, functions in a cooperative manner in efficient peroxisomal targeting and insertion. In addition, targeting with high fidelity to peroxisomes requires all four membrane-spanning domains in PMP22. Together, these results illustrate that the PMP22 membrane peroxisomal targeting signal is complex and that different elements within the signal may be responsible for mediating unique aspects of PMP22 biogenesis, including maintaining the solubility before membrane insertion, targeting to peroxisomes, and ensuring proper assembly in the peroxisomal boundary membrane.     

The Sec translocon mediated protein transport in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Protein transport via the Sec translocon represents an evolutionary conserved mechanism for delivering cytosolically-synthesized proteins to extra-cytosolic compartments. The Sec translocon has a three-subunit core, termed Sec61 in Eukaryotes and SecYEG in Bacteria. It is located in the endoplasmic reticulum of Eukaryotes and in the cytoplasmic membrane of Bacteria where it constitutes a channel that can be activated by multiple partner proteins. These partner proteins determine the mechanism of polypeptide movement across the channel. During SRP-dependent co-translational targeting, the ribosome threads the nascent protein directly into the Sec channel. This pathway is in Bacteria mainly dedicated for membrane proteins but in Eukaryotes also employed by secretory proteins. The alternative pathway, leading to post-translational translocation across the Sec translocon engages an ATP-dependent pushing mechanism by the motor protein SecA in Bacteria and a ratcheting mechanism by the lumenal chaperone BiP in Eukaryotes. Protein transport and biogenesis is also assisted by additional proteins at the lateral gate of SecY/Sec61α and in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum or in the periplasm of bacterial cells. The modular assembly enables the Sec complex to transport a vast array of substrates. In this review we summarize recent biochemical and structural information on the prokaryotic and eukaryotic Sec translocons and we describe the remarkably complex interaction network of the Sec complexes.     

Translation elongation regulates substrate selection by the signal recognition particle

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a universally conserved cellular machinery responsible for delivering membrane and secretory proteins to the proper cellular destination. The precise mechanism by which fidelity is achieved by the SRP pathway within the in vivo environment is yet to be understood. Previous studies have focused on the SRP pathway in isolation. Here we describe another important factor that modulates substrate selection by the SRP pathway: the ongoing synthesis of the nascent polypeptide chain by the ribosome. A slower translation elongation rate rescues the targeting defect of substrate proteins bearing mutant, suboptimal signal sequences both in vitro and in vivo. Consistent with a kinetic origin of this effect, similar rescue of protein targeting was also observed with mutant SRP receptors or SRP RNAs that specifically compromise the kinetics of SRP-receptor interaction during protein targeting. These data are consistent with a model in which ongoing protein translation is in constant kinetic competition with the targeting of the nascent proteins by the SRP and provides an important factor to regulate the fidelity of substrate selection by the SRP.     

Signal recognition particle mediated protein targeting in Escherichia coli

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a conserved ribonucleoprotein complex that binds to targeting sequences in nascent secretory and membrane proteins. The SRP guides these proteins to the cytoplasmic membrane in prokaryotes and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes via an interaction with its cognate receptor. The E. coli SRP is relatively small and is currently used as a model for fundamental and applied studies on translation-linked protein targeting. In this review recent advances in our understanding of the structure and function of the E. coli SRP and its receptor are discussed. In particular, the interplay between the SRP pathway and other targeting routes, the role of guanine nucleotides in cycling of the SRP and the substrate specificity of the SRP are highlighted     

Membrane targeting of a bacterial virulence factor harbouring an extended signal peptide

Filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) is the major adhesin of Bordetella pertussis, the whooping cough agent. FHA is synthesized as a 367-kDa precursor harbouring a remarkably long signal peptide with an N-terminal extension that is conserved among related virulence proteins. FHA is secreted via the two-partner secretion pathway that involves transport across the outer membrane by a cognate transporter protein. Here we have analyzed the mechanism by which FHA is targeted to, and translocated across, the inner membrane. Studies were performed both in vitro using Escherichia coli inside-out inner membrane vesicles and in vivo by pulse-chase labelling of Bordetella pertussis cells. The data collectively indicate that like classical periplasmic and outer membrane proteins, FHA requires SecA and SecB for its export through the SecYEG translocon in the inner membrane. Although short nascent chains of FHA were found to cross-link to signal recognition particle (SRP), we did not obtain indication for an SRP-dependent, co-translational membrane targeting provoked by the FHA signal sequence. Our results rule out that the extended signal peptide of FHA determines a specific mode of membrane targeting but rather suggest that it might influence the export rate at the inner membrane.     

Co-translational protein targeting to the bacterial membrane

Co-translational protein targeting by the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) is an essential cellular pathway that couples the synthesis of nascent proteins to their proper cellular localization. The bacterial SRP, which contains the minimal ribonucleoprotein core of this universally conserved targeting machine, has served as a paradigm for understanding the molecular basis of protein localization in all cells. In this review, we highlight recent biochemical and structural insights into the molecular mechanisms by which fundamental challenges faced by protein targeting machineries are met in the SRP pathway. Collectively, these studies elucidate how an essential SRP RNA and two regulatory GTPases in the SRP and SRP receptor (SR) enable this targeting machinery to recognize, sense and respond to its biological effectors, i.e. the cargo protein, the target membrane and the translocation machinery, thus driving efficient and faithful co-translational protein targeting. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.     

Regulation of protein biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

The biogenesis of most secretory and membrane proteins involves targeting the nascent protein to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), translocation across or integration into the ER membrane and maturation into a functional product. The essential machinery that directs these events for model secretory and membrane proteins has been identified, shifting the focus of studies towards the molecular mechanisms by which these core components function. By contrast, regulatory mechanisms that allow certain proteins to serve multiple functions within a cell remain entirely unexplored. This article examines each stage of protein biogenesis as a potential site of regulation that could be exploited by the cell to effectively increase the diversity of functional gene expression.     

Protein trafficking in plant cells

The cells of higher plants contain distinct subcellular compartments (organelles) that perform specialized functions such as photosynthesis, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and so forth. The majority of the protein constituents of plant organelles are formed as cytosolic precursors with N-terminal extensions that direct transport across one or more membrane bilayers in a post- or co-translational fashion. Since the majority of proteins in plant cells are products of nuclear gene expression, there must be precise sorting mechanisms in the cytoplasm that direct proteins to their correct cellular locations. Based on recent studies of protein targeting to chloroplasts and vacuoles, the details of these intracellular sorting mechanisms are becoming clear. The ability to direct proteins to specific compartments within cells provides new opportunities for improvement of plants by genetic manipulation.