Evolutionary analyses of the small subunit of glutamate synthase: gene order conservation,gene fusions,and prokaryote-to-eukaryote lateral gene transfers

Lateral gene transfer has been identified as an important mode of genome evolution within prokaryotes. Except for the special case of gene transfer from organelle genomes to the eukaryotic nucleus, only a few cases of lateral gene transfer involving eukaryotes have been described. Here we present phylogenetic and gene order analyses on the small subunit of glutamate synthase (encoded by gltD) and its homologues, including the large subunit of sulfide dehydrogenase (encoded by sudA). The scattered distribution of the sudA and sudB gene pair and the phylogenetic analysis strongly suggest that lateral gene transfer was involved in the propagation of the genes in the three domains of life. One of these transfers most likely occurred between a prokaryote and an ancestor of diplomonad protists. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses indicate that the gene for the small subunit of glutamate synthase was transferred from a low-GC gram-positive bacterium to a common ancestor of animals, fungi, and plants. Interestingly, in both examples, the eukaryotes encode a single gene that corresponds to a conserved operon structure in prokaryotes. Our analyses, together with several recent publications, show that lateral gene transfers from prokaryotes to unicellular eukaryotes occur with appreciable frequency. In the case of the genes for sulfide dehydrogenase, the transfer affected only a limited group of eukaryotes—the diplomonads—while the transfer of the glutamate synthase gene probably happened earlier in evolution and affected a wider range of eukaryotes.     

Frequent,independent transfers of a catabolic gene from bacteria to contrasted filamentous eukaryotes

Even genetically distant prokaryotes can exchange genes between them, and these horizontal gene transfer events play a central role in adaptation and evolution. While this was long thought to be restricted to prokaryotes, certain eukaryotes have acquired genes of bacterial origin. However, gene acquisitions in eukaryotes are thought to be much less important in magnitude than in prokaryotes. Here, we describe the complex evolutionary history of a bacterial catabolic gene that has been transferred repeatedly from different bacterial phyla to stramenopiles and fungi. Indeed, phylogenomic analysis pointed to multiple acquisitions of the gene in these filamentous eukaryotes—as many as 15 different events for 65 microeukaryotes. Furthermore, once transferred, this gene acquired introns and was found expressed in mRNA databases for most recipients. Our results show that effective inter-domain transfers and subsequent adaptation of a prokaryotic gene in eukaryotic cells can happen at an unprecedented magnitude.     

Sagas of the Children of Time: The Importance of Phylogenetic Teaching in Biology

Theodosius Dobznahnsky said nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of the historical emergence of species. Species are the biological “children of time.” If we seek to understand them, historical narratives are essential elements of our causal explanations. Phylogenetic systematic analysis provides the Rosetta Stone for uncovering that narrative.     

Bioenergetic Constraints on the Evolution of Complex Life

All morphologically complex life on Earth, beyond the level of cyanobacteria, is eukaryotic. All eukaryotes share a common ancestor that was already a complex cell. Despite their biochemical virtuosity, prokaryotes show little tendency to evolve eukaryotic traits or large genomes. Here I argue that prokaryotes are constrained by their membrane bioenergetics, for fundamental reasons relating to the origin of life. Eukaryotes arose in a rare endosymbiosis between two prokaryotes, which broke the energetic constraints on prokaryotes and gave rise to mitochondria. Loss of almost all mitochondrial genes produced an extreme genomic asymmetry, in which tiny mitochondrial genomes support, energetically, a massive nuclear genome, giving eukaryotes three to five orders of magnitude more energy per gene than prokaryotes. The requirement for endosymbiosis radically altered selection on eukaryotes, potentially explaining the evolution of unique traits, including the nucleus, sex, two sexes, speciation, and aging.Evolutionary theory has enormous explanatory power and is understood in detail at the molecular genetic level, yet it cannot easily predict even the past. The history of life on Earth is troubling. Life apparently arose very early, perhaps 4 billion years ago, but then remained essentially bacterial for probably some 2–3 billion years. Bacteria and archaea explored almost every conceivable metabolic niche and still dominate in terms of biomass. Yet, in morphological diversity and genomic complexity, bacteria barely begin to compare with eukaryotes, even at the level of cells, let alone multicellular plants and animals. Eukaryotes are monophyletic and share a common ancestor that by definition arose only once, probably between 1.5 and 2 billion years ago, although the dates are poorly constrained (Knoll et al. 2006; Parfrey et al. 2011). The eukaryotic common ancestor already had a nucleus, nuclear pore complexes, introns and exons, straight chromosomes, mitosis and meiotic sex, a dynamic cytoskeleton, an endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria, making it difficult to trace the evolution of these traits from a prokaryotic state (Koonin 2010). The “eukaryotic niche”—limited metabolic diversity but enormous morphological complexity—was never invaded by prokaryotes. In short, life arose early, stagnated in morphological complexity for several billion years, and then rather abruptly gave rise to a single group—the eukaryotes—which explored the morphological realm of life in ways never seen in bacteria or archaea.Consider the possibility of life evolving on other planets. Would it follow a similar trajectory? If not, why not? Evolutionary theory gives little insight. The perplexing history of life on Earth conceals a paradox relating to natural selection. If basal eukaryotic traits such as the nucleus, meiotic sex, and phagocytosis arose by selection, starting with a prokaryotic ancestor, and each step offered some small advantage over the last, then why don’t the same traits arise repeatedly in prokaryotes too? Prokaryotes made many a start. There are examples of bacteria or archaea with nucleus-like structures (Lindsay et al. 2001), recombination (Smith et al. 1993), linear chromosomes (Bentley et al. 2002), internal membranes (Pinevich 1997), multiple replicons (Robinson and Bell 2007), giant size (Schulz and Jorgensen 2001), extreme polyploidy (Mendell et al. 2008), a dynamic cytoskeleton (Vats and Rothfield 2009), predation (Davidov and Jurkevitch 2009), parasitism (Moran 2007), introns and exons (Simon and Zimmerly 2008), intercellular signaling (Waters and Bassler 2005), endocytosis-like processes (Lonhienne et al. 2010), and even endosymbionts (Wujek 1979; von Dohlen et al. 2001). Yet, for each of these traits, bacteria and archaea stopped well short of the baroque complexity of eukaryotes. Compare this with the evolution of eyes. From a simple, light-sensitive spot in an early metazoan, morphologically disparate eyes arose on scores of occasions (Vopalensky and Kozmic 2009). This is exactly what evolutionary theory predicts. Each step offers an advantage in its own ecological setting, so morphologically different eyes arise on multiple occasions. Why is this not the case for traits such as the nucleus, meiotic sex, and phagocytosis? To suggest that lateral gene transfer (LGT) or bacterial conjugation is equivalent to meiotic sex will not do: Neither involves a systematic and reciprocal exchange of alleles across the entire genome.The simplest explanation is a bottleneck. The “big bang” radiation of major eukaryotic supergroups, combined with the apparent absence of surviving evolutionary intermediates between prokaryotes and the last eukaryotic common ancestor, does indeed hint at a bottleneck at the origin of eukaryotes. There is no shortage of environmental possibilities, from snowball glaciations to rising atmospheric oxygen. The most widely held explanation contends that when oxygen levels rose after the great oxidation event, some proto-eukaryotic cells acquired mitochondria, which protected them against oxygen toxicity (Andersson and Kurland 1999) and enabled them to exploit oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor in respiration (Sagan 1967), giving the first eukaryotes an enormous competitive advantage. They swiftly occupied new niches made available by oxygen, outcompeting to extinction any other prokaryotes that tried subsequently to invade this niche (de Duve 2007; Gross and Bhattacharya 2010). But this is an evolutionary “just-so story” and has no evidence to support it. The idea that mitochondria might protect against oxygen toxicity is nonsense: The single-electron donors of respiratory chains are among the most potent free-radical generators known. And what was to stop facultatively aerobic bacteria—from which the mitochondria evolved, hence already present—from occupying the aerobic niche first?In fact, the limited evidence available suggests that oxygen had little to do with it (Müller et al. 2012; van der Giezen and Lenton 2012). A large, diverse group of morphologically simple protists dubbed archezoa are the key here. The archezoa appear to lack mitochondria; and three decades ago, looked to branch deeply in the eukaryotic tree. Cavalier-Smith postulated that some archezoa might be primitively amitochondriate: surviving evolutionary intermediates between prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Cavalier-Smith 1987, 1989). But 20 years of careful molecular biology and phylogenetics have shown that all known archezoa possess specialized organelles that derive from mitochondria, namely hydrogenosomes or mitosomes (Keeling 1998; Embley and Martin 2006; van der Giezen 2009; Archibald 2011). The archezoa are obviously not real evolutionary intermediates, and radical developments in phylogenomics have transformed the eukaryotic tree to a “big-bang” radiation with no early branching archezoa (Koonin 2010). The archezoa remain significant not because they are genuine evolutionary intermediates, but because they are true ecological intermediates. Critically, they were not outcompeted to extinction by more sophisticated aerobic eukaryotes. On the contrary, they lost their capacity for aerobic respiration and depend instead on anaerobic fermentations, yet remain, morphologically, more complex than bacteria or archaea.The fact that the archezoa are a phylogenetically disparate group that arose on multiple occasions is equally significant. The “intermediate” niche is viable and was invaded many times, without the new arrivals being outcompeted to extinction by existing cells, or vice versa. Yet each time the invader was an anaerobic eukaryote, which adapted by reductive evolution to the niche—not bacteria or archaea evolving slightly greater complexity. What is the likelihood of this bias? Given at least 20 independent origins of archezoa (van der Giezen 2009; Müller et al. 2012), the probability of these ecological intermediates arising each time from the eukaryotes rather than prokaryotes is less than one in a million. It is far more parsimonious to assume that there was something about the structure of eukaryotes that facilitated their invasion of this intermediate niche; and, conversely, something about the structure of prokaryotes that tended to preclude their evolution of greater morphological complexity. But this quite reasonable statement is loaded because it implies that prokaryotes existed for nearly 4 billion years, and throughout that time showed no tendency to evolve greater morphological complexity. In stark contrast, eukaryotes arose just once, a seemingly improbable event.Here I argue that the constraint on prokaryotes was bioenergetic. There was, indeed, a bottleneck at the origin of eukaryotes, but it was biological (restrictive), not environmental (selective). It related to the physical structure of prokaryotic cells: Both bacteria and archaea respire across their plasma membrane. I make three key points, which arguably apply to life elsewhere in the universe, and are therefore proposed as biological principles that could guide our understanding of life generally: (1) chemiosmotic coupling is as universal as the genetic code, for fundamental reasons relating to the origin of life; (2) prokaryotes are constrained by chemiosmotic coupling across their plasma membrane, but eukaryotes escaped this constraint through a rare and stochastic endosymbiosis between two prokaryotes, giving them orders of magnitude more energy per gene; and (3) this endosymbiosis, in turn, produced a unique genomic asymmetry, transforming the selection pressures acting on eukaryotes and driving the evolution of unique eukaryotic traits.     

Phylogenetic analyses of diplomonad genes reveal frequent lateral gene transfers affecting eukaryotes

BACKGROUND: Lateral gene transfer (LGT) is an important evolutionary mechanism among prokaryotes. The situation in eukaryotes is less clear; the human genome sequence failed to give strong support for any recent transfers from prokaryotes to vertebrates, yet a number of LGTs from prokaryotes to protists (unicellular eukaryotes) have been documented. Here, we perform a systematic analysis to investigate the impact of LGT on the evolution of diplomonads, a group of anaerobic protists.RESULTS: Phylogenetic analyses of 15 genes present in the genome of the Atlantic Salmon parasite Spironucleus barkhanus and/or the intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia show that most of these genes originated via LGT. Half of the genes are putatively involved in processes related to an anaerobic lifestyle, and this finding suggests that a common ancestor, which most probably was aerobic, of Spironucleus and Giardia adapted to an anaerobic environment in part by acquiring genes via LGT from prokaryotes. The sources of the transferred diplomonad genes are found among all three domains of life, including other eukaryotes. Many of the phylogenetic reconstructions show eukaryotes emerging in several distinct regions of the tree, strongly suggesting that LGT not only involved diplomonads, but also involved other eukaryotic groups.CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that LGT is a significant evolutionary mechanism among diplomonads in particular and protists in general. These findings provide insights into the evolution of biochemical pathways in early eukaryote evolution and have important implications for studies of eukaryotic genome evolution and organismal relationships. Furthermore, "fusion" hypotheses for the origin of eukaryotes need to be rigorously reexamined in the light of these results.     

New insights into the molecular mechanisms of evolution: stress increases genetic diversity

The mechanisms of stress-induced mutagenesis in prokaryotes and realization of reserved (preaccumulated) genetic variation in eukaryotes are considered. In prokaryotes, replication becomes error-prone in stress because of the induction of the SOS response and the inactivation of the mismatch repair system; stress also increases the transposition rate and the efficiency of interspecific gene transfer. In eukaryotes, chaperone HSP90, which restores the native folding of mutant proteins (e.g., signal transduction and morphogenetic proteins) in normal conditions, fails to do so in stress, which leads to abrupt expression of multiple mutations earlier reserved in the corresponding genes. The role of these mechanisms in the evolution of prokaryotes and eukaryotes is discussed.     

New Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Evolution: Stress Increases Genetic Diversity

The mechanisms of stress-induced mutagenesis in prokaryotes and realization of reserved (preaccumulated) genetic variation in eukaryotes are considered. In prokaryotes, replication becomes error-prone in stress because of the induction of the SOS response and the inactivation of the mismatch repair system; stress also increases the transposition rate and the efficiency of interspecific gene transfer. In eukaryotes, chaperone HSP90, which restores the native folding of mutant proteins (e.g., signal transduction and morphogenetic proteins) in normal conditions, fails to do so in stress, which leads to abrupt expression of multiple mutations earlier reserved in the corresponding genes. The role of these mechanisms in the evolution of prokaryotes and eukaryotes is discussed.     

Horizontal transfer of a eukaryotic plastid-targeted protein gene to cyanobacteria

Background  

Horizontal or lateral transfer of genetic material between distantly related prokaryotes has been shown to play a major role in the evolution of bacterial and archaeal genomes, but exchange of genes between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is not as well understood. In particular, gene flow from eukaryotes to prokaryotes is rarely documented with strong support, which is unusual since prokaryotic genomes appear to readily accept foreign genes.     

The evolution of recombination

The selective forces responsible for the evolution of genes mediating recombination are discussed. These genes originated because of their role indna repair. In eukaryotes, their role in repair is not sufficient to account for the evolution of meiosis and syngamy. Therefore, a “hitch-hiking” explanation is required, according to which a recombination gene gets a lift in frequency from the high-fitness genes to which it is linked. Such hitch-hiking models are reviewed: collectively they provide an adequate explanation for the maintenance of sex and recombination in eukaryotes. In prokaryotes, the main selective force favouring recombination isdna repair: the cross-overs caused by recombination may occasionally have important evolutionary effects, but they are the consequences, rather than the causes, of the evolution of recombination in prokaryotes. In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, recombination genes also cause specific, repeatable and adaptive rearrangements of the genetic material.     

Recent events dominate interdomain lateral gene transfers between prokaryotes and eukaryotes and,with the exception of endosymbiotic gene transfers,few ancient transfer events persist

While there is compelling evidence for the impact of endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT; transfer from either mitochondrion or chloroplast to the nucleus) on genome evolution in eukaryotes, the role of interdomain transfer from bacteria and/or archaea (i.e. prokaryotes) is less clear. Lateral gene transfers (LGTs) have been argued to be potential sources of phylogenetic information, particularly for reconstructing deep nodes that are difficult to recover with traditional phylogenetic methods. We sought to identify interdomain LGTs by using a phylogenomic pipeline that generated 13 465 single gene trees and included up to 487 eukaryotes, 303 bacteria and 118 archaea. Our goals include searching for LGTs that unite major eukaryotic clades, and describing the relative contributions of LGT and EGT across the eukaryotic tree of life. Given the difficulties in interpreting single gene trees that aim to capture the approximately 1.8 billion years of eukaryotic evolution, we focus on presence–absence data to identify interdomain transfer events. Specifically, we identify 1138 genes found only in prokaryotes and representatives of three or fewer major clades of eukaryotes (e.g. Amoebozoa, Archaeplastida, Excavata, Opisthokonta, SAR and orphan lineages). The majority of these genes have phylogenetic patterns that are consistent with recent interdomain LGTs and, with the notable exception of EGTs involving photosynthetic eukaryotes, we detect few ancient interdomain LGTs. These analyses suggest that LGTs have probably occurred throughout the history of eukaryotes, but that ancient events are not maintained unless they are associated with endosymbiotic gene transfer among photosynthetic lineages.     

Segregational Drift Constrains the Evolutionary Rate of Prokaryotic Plasmids

Plasmids are extrachromosomal genetic elements in prokaryotes that have been recognized as important drivers of microbial ecology and evolution. Plasmids are found in multiple copies inside their host cell where independent emergence of mutations may lead to intracellular genetic heterogeneity. The intracellular plasmid diversity is thus subject to changes upon cell division. However, the effect of plasmid segregation on plasmid evolution remains understudied. Here, we show that genetic drift during cell division—segregational drift—leads to the rapid extinction of novel plasmid alleles. We established a novel experimental approach to control plasmid allele frequency at the levels of a single cell and the whole population. Following the dynamics of plasmid alleles in an evolution experiment, we find that the mode of plasmid inheritance—random or clustered—is an important determinant of plasmid allele dynamics. Phylogenetic reconstruction of our model plasmid in clinical isolates furthermore reveals a slow evolutionary rate of plasmid-encoded genes in comparison to chromosomal genes. Our study provides empirical evidence that genetic drift in plasmid evolution occurs at multiple levels: the host cell and the population of hosts. Segregational drift has implications for the evolutionary rate heterogeneity of extrachromosomal genetic elements.     

The origin of introns and their role in eukaryogenesis: a compromise solution to the introns-early versus introns-late debate?

Background  

Ever since the discovery of 'genes in pieces' and mRNA splicing in eukaryotes, origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns have been considered within the conceptual framework of the 'introns early' versus 'introns late' debate. The 'introns early' hypothesis, which is closely linked to the so-called exon theory of gene evolution, posits that protein-coding genes were interrupted by numerous introns even at the earliest stages of life's evolution and that introns played a major role in the origin of proteins by facilitating recombination of sequences coding for small protein/peptide modules. Under this scenario, the absence of spliceosomal introns in prokaryotes is considered to be a result of "genome streamlining". The 'introns late' hypothesis counters that spliceosomal introns emerged only in eukaryotes, and moreover, have been inserted into protein-coding genes continuously throughout the evolution of eukaryotes. Beyond the formal dilemma, the more substantial side of this debate has to do with possible roles of introns in the evolution of eukaryotes.     

Conjugative plasmids: vessels of the communal gene pool

Comparative whole-genome analyses have demonstrated that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) provides a significant contribution to prokaryotic genome innovation. The evolution of specific prokaryotes is therefore tightly linked to the environment in which they live and the communal pool of genes available within that environment. Here we use the term supergenome to describe the set of all genes that a prokaryotic ‘individual’ can draw on within a particular environmental setting. Conjugative plasmids can be considered particularly successful entities within the communal pool, which have enabled HGT over large taxonomic distances. These plasmids are collections of discrete regions of genes that function as ‘backbone modules’ to undertake different aspects of overall plasmid maintenance and propagation. Conjugative plasmids often carry suites of ‘accessory elements’ that contribute adaptive traits to the hosts and, potentially, other resident prokaryotes within specific environmental niches. Insight into the evolution of plasmid modules therefore contributes to our knowledge of gene dissemination and evolution within prokaryotic communities. This communal pool provides the prokaryotes with an important mechanistic framework for obtaining adaptability and functional diversity that alleviates the need for large genomes of specialized ‘private genes’.     

The Symbiotic Self

The classical one genome-one organism conception of the individual is yielding today to a symbiotic conception of the organism. Microbial symbiosis is fundamental in our evolution, physiology and development. This notion, while not new, has been revitalized by advances in molecular methods for studying microbial diversity over the past decade. An ecological understanding of our microbial communities in health and disease supplements the venerable one germ-one disease conception of classical germ theory, and reinforces the view that nothing in biology makes sense except in light of symbiosis.     

Molybdoproteomes and evolution of molybdenum utilization

The trace element molybdenum (Mo) is utilized in many life forms, and it is a key component of several enzymes involved in nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon metabolism. With the exception of nitrogenase, Mo is bound in proteins to a pterin, thus forming the molybdenum cofactor (Moco) at the catalytic sites of molybdoenzymes. Although a number of molybdoenzymes are well characterized structurally and functionally, evolutionary analyses of Mo utilization are limited. Here, we carried out comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses to examine the occurrence and evolution of Mo utilization in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes at the level of (i) Mo transport and Moco utilization trait, and (ii) Mo-dependent enzymes. Our results revealed that most prokaryotes and all higher eukaryotes utilize Mo whereas many unicellular eukaryotes including parasites and most yeasts lost the ability to use this metal. In addition, eukaryotes have fewer molybdoenzyme families than prokaryotes. Dimethylsulfoxide reductase (DMSOR) and sulfite oxidase (SO) families were the most widespread molybdoenzymes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, respectively. A distant group of the ModABC transport system, was predicted in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum. ModE-type regulation of Mo uptake occurred in less than 30% of Moco-utilizing organisms. A link between Mo and selenocysteine utilization in prokaryotes was also identified wherein the selenocysteine trait was largely a subset of the Mo trait, presumably due to formate dehydrogenase, a Mo- and selenium-containing protein. Finally, analysis of environmental conditions and organisms that do or do not depend on Mo revealed that host-associated organisms and organisms with low G + C content tend to reduce their Mo utilization. Overall, our data provide new insights into Mo utilization and show its wide occurrence, yet limited use of this metal in individual organisms in all three domains of life.     

Parallel Genetic Evolution Within and Between Bacteriophage Species of Varying Degrees of Divergence

Parallel evolution is the acquisition of identical adaptive traits in independently evolving populations. Understanding whether the genetic changes underlying adaptation to a common selective environment are parallel within and between species is interesting because it sheds light on the degree of evolutionary constraints. If parallel evolution is perfect, then the implication is that forces such as functional constraints, epistasis, and pleiotropy play an important role in shaping the outcomes of adaptive evolution. In addition, population genetic theory predicts that the probability of parallel evolution will decline with an increase in the number of adaptive solutions—if a single adaptive solution exists, then parallel evolution will be observed among highly divergent species. For this reason, it is predicted that close relatives—which likely overlap more in the details of their adaptive solutions—will show more parallel evolution. By adapting three related bacteriophage species to a novel environment we find (1) a high rate of parallel genetic evolution at orthologous nucleotide and amino acid residues within species, (2) parallel beneficial mutations do not occur in a common order in which they fix or appear in an evolving population, (3) low rates of parallel evolution and convergent evolution between species, and (4) the probability of parallel and convergent evolution between species is strongly effected by divergence.     

Concerted gene recruitment in early plant evolution

Background  

Horizontal gene transfer occurs frequently in prokaryotes and unicellular eukaryotes. Anciently acquired genes, if retained among descendants, might significantly affect the long-term evolution of the recipient lineage. However, no systematic studies on the scope of anciently acquired genes and their impact on macroevolution are currently available in eukaryotes.     

The exon-intron organization of the human erythrocyte alpha-spectrin gene.

The human erythrocyte alpha-spectrin gene which spans 80 kbp has been cloned from human genomic DNA as overlapping lambda recombinants. The exon-intron junctions were identified and the exons mapped. The gene is encoded by 52 exons whose sizes range from 684 bp to the smallest of 18 bp. The donor and acceptor splice site sequences match the splice site consensus sequences, with the exception of one splice site where a donor sequence begins with -GC. The size and location of exons do not correlate with the 106-amino-acid repeat, except in three locations where the surrounding codons are conserved as well. The lack of correspondence between exons and 106-amino-acid repeat is interpreted to reflect the appearance of a spectrin-like gene from a minigene early in the evolution of eukaryotes. Since current evidence indicates that introns were present in genes before the divergence of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, it is possible that the original distribution of introns within the minigene has been lost by the random deletion of introns from the spectrin gene.     

Molecular evolution more than three billion years ago

The earlier stages of life evolution at the molecular level were reconstructed. A set of triplets incorporated into the earliest RNA molecules (mRNA) was determined. It is believed that tRNA is one of the descedants of the earliest protein-encoding sequences. It was shown that tRNA has a hidden periodic structure of base sequences that conforms to the rule (GNY)n, indicating it ancient age. A set of the earliest amino acids was established and their distribution with respect to age was made. It was shown that genomes were built from elementary units (primary genes) by recombination or binding some time prior to division into eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Mean dimensions of the elementary unit for eukaryotes and prokaryotes were determined.