Identification of X Chromosome Regions in Caenorhabditis Elegans That Contain Sex-Determination Signal Elements

The primary sex-determination signal of Caenorhabditis elegans is the ratio of X chromosomes to sets of autosomes (X/A ratio). This signal coordinately controls both sex determination and X chromosome dosage compensation. To delineate regions of X that contain counted signal elements, we examined the effect on the X/A ratio of changing the dose of specific regions of X, using duplications in XO animals and deficiencies in XX animals. Based on the mutant phenotypes of genes that are controlled by the signal, we expected that increases (in males) or decreases (in hermaphrodites) in the dose of X chromosome elements could cause sex-specific lethality. We isolated duplications and deficiencies of specific X chromosome regions, using strategies that would permit their recovery regardless of whether they affect the signal. We identified a dose-sensitive region at the left end of X that contains X chromosome signal elements. XX hermaphrodites with only one dose of this region have sex determination and dosage compensation defects, and XO males with two doses are more severely affected and die. The hermaphrodite defects are suppressed by a downstream mutation that forces all animals into the XX mode of sex determination and dosage compensation. The male lethality is suppressed by mutations that force all animals into the XO mode of both processes. We were able to subdivide this region into three smaller regions, each of which contains at least one signal element. We propose that the X chromosome component of the sex-determination signal is the dose of a relatively small number of genes.     

A sex-determining gene,fem-1, required for both male and hermaphrodite development in Caenorhabditis elegans

Sex in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is normally determined by the X chromosome to autosome (X:A) ratio, with XX hermaphrodites and XO males. Previous work has shown that a set of at least four autosomal genes (her-1, tra-2, tra-3, and tra-1) is signaled by the X:A ratio and appears to act in a regulatory pathway to determine sex. Twenty-one new recessive alleles of the gene fem-1(IV) (formerly isx-1) have been isolated. Seven of these may be null alleles; one of these is an amber mutation. The other 14 alleles are temperature sensitive. The putative null mutations cause both XO and XX animals to develop as females when the mother as well as the zygote is fem-1(?). Therefore, fem-1(+) is required (a) for the development of the male body and (b) for spermatogenesis in males and hermaphrodites. In addition, fem-1 shows a maternal effect: wild-type fem-1 product partially rescues the development of fem-1(?) progeny. By analyzing double mutants it has been shown that fem-1(+) is part of the sex-determination pathway and has two distinct functions: (1) in the soma it prevents the action of tra-1, thereby allowing male development to occur, and (2) in the germline it is necessary for spermatogenesis in both sexes.     

Extragenic suppressors of a dominant masculinizing her-1 mutation in C. elegans identify two new genes that affect sex determination in different ways

Summary: The her-1 regulatory switch gene in C. elegans sex determination is normally active in XO animals, resulting in male development, and inactive in XX animals, allowing hermaphrodite development. The her-1(n695gf) mutation results in the incomplete transformation of XX animals into phenotypic males. We describe four extragenic mutations that suppress the masculinized phenotype of her-1(n695gf) XX. They define two previously undescribed genes, sup-26 and sup-27. All four mutations exhibit semidominance of suppression and by themselves have no visible effects on sex determination in otherwise genotypically wild-type XX or XO animals. Analysis of interactions with mutations in the major sex-determining genes show that sup-26 and sup-27 influence sex determination in fundamentally different ways. sup-26 appears to act independently of her-1 to negatively modulate synthesis or function of tra-2 in both XX and XO animals. sup-27 may play a role in X-chromosome dosage compensation and influence sex determination indirectly.     

A Novel Dominant Transformer Allele of the Sex-Determining Gene Her-1 of Caenorhabditis Elegans

We have characterized a novel dominant allele of the sex-determining gene her-1 of Caenorhabditis elegans. This allele, called n695, results in the incomplete transformation of XX animals into phenotypic males. Previously characterized recessive her-1 alleles transform XO animals into phenotypic hermaphrodites. We have identified five new recessive her-1 mutations as intragenic suppressors of n695. Three of these suppressors are weak, temperature-sensitive alleles. We show that the recessive her-1 mutations are loss-of-function alleles, and that the her-1(n695) mutation results in a gain-of-function at the her-1 locus. The existence of dominant and recessive alleles that cause opposite phenotypic transformations demonstrates that the her-1 gene acts to control sexual identity in C. elegans.     

Activity of the Sex-Determining Gene tra-2 Is Modulated to Allow Spermatogenesis in the C. ELEGANS Hermaphrodite

In the nematode C. elegans, there are two sexes, the self-fertilizing hermaphrodite (XX) and the male (XO). The hermaphrodite is essentially a female that makes sperm for a brief period before oogenesis. Sex determination in C. elegans is controlled by a pathway of autosomal regulatory genes, the state of which is determined by the X:A ratio. One of these genes, tra-2, is required for hermaphrodite development, but not for male development, because null mutations in tra-2 masculinize XX animals but have no effect on XO males. Dominant, gain-of-function tra-2 mutations have now been isolated that completely feminize the germline of XX animals so that they make only oocytes and no sperm and, thus, are female. Most of the tra-2(dom) mutations do not correspondingly feminize XO animals, so they do not appear to interfere with control by her-1, a gene thought to negatively regulate tra-2 in XO animals. Thus, these mutations appear to cause gain of tra-2 function in the XX animal only. Dosage studies indicate that 5 of 7 tra-2(dom) alleles are hypomorphic, so they do not simply elevate XX tra-2 activity overall. These properties suggest that in the wild type, tra-2 activity is under two types of control: (1) in males, it is inactivated by her-1 to allow male development to occur, and (2) in hermaphrodites, tra-2 is active but transiently inactivated by another, unknown, regulator to allow hermaphrodite spermatogenesis; this mode of regulation is hindered by the tra-2(dom) mutations, thereby resulting in XX females.     

Isolation of Dominant Xo-Feminizing Mutations in Caenorhabditis Elegans: New Regulatory Tra Alleles and an X Chromosome Duplication with Implications for Primary Sex Determination

A strain of Caenorhabditis elegans was constructed that permits selection of dominant or sex-linked mutations that transform XO animals (normally male) into fertile females, using a feminizing mutation, tra-2(e2046gf), which by itself does not sexually transform XO males. Twenty-three mutations were isolated after chemical mutagenesis and found to fall into both expected classes (four dominant tra-1 mutations and eight recessive xol-1 mutations) and novel classes. The novel mutations include 10 second-site mutations of tra-2, which are called eg mutations, for enhanced gain-of-function. The tra-2(gf, eg) alleles lead to complete dominant transformation of XO animals from fertile male into fertile female. Also isolated was a duplication of the left end of the X chromosome, eDp26, which has dominant XO lethal and feminizing properties, unlike all previously isolated duplications of the X chromosome. The properties of eDp26 indicate that it carries copies of one or more numerator elements, which act as part of the primary sex-determination signal, the X:A ratio. The eDp26 duplication is attached to the left tip of the X chromosome in inverted orientation and consequently can be used to generate unstable attached-X chromosomes.     

Sex determination and sex reversal: genotype,phenotype, dogma and semantics

Summary The genetic terminology of sex determination and sex differentiation is examined in relation to its underlying biological basis. On the assumption that the function of the testis is to produce hormones and spermatozoa, the hypothesis of a single Y-chromosomal testis-determining gene with a dominant effect is shown to run counter to the following observed facts: a lowering in testosterone levels and an increase in the incidence of undescended testes, in addition to sterility, in males with multiple X chromosomes; abnormalities of the testes in autosomal trisomies; phenotypic abnormalities of XX males apparently increasing with decreasing amounts of Y-chromosomal material; the occurrence of patients with gonadal dysgenesis and XY males with ambiguous genitalia in the same sibship; the occurrence of identical SRY mutations in patients with gonadal dysgenesis and fertile males in the same pedigree; and the development of XY female and hermaphrodite mice having the same genetic constitution. The role of X inactivation in the production of males, females and hermaphrodites in T(X;16)16H mice has previously been suggested but not unequivocally demonstrated; moreover, X inactivation cannot account for the observed bilateral asymmetry of gonadal differentiation in XY hermaphrodites in humans and mice. There is evidence for a delay in development of the supporting cells in XY mice with ovarian formation. Once testicular differentiation and male hormone secretion have begun, other Y-chromosomal genes are required to maintain spermatogenesis and to complete spermiogenesis, but these genes do not function effectively in the presence of more than one X chromosome. The impairment of spermatogenesis by many other chromosome abnormalities seems to be more severe than that of oogenesis. It is concluded that the notion of a single testis-determining gene being responsible for male sex differentiation lacks biological validity, and that the genotype of a functional, i.e. fertile, male differs from that of a functional female by the presence of multiple Y-chromosomal genes in association with but a single X chromosome. Male sex differentiation in XY individuals can be further impaired by a euploid, but inappropriate, genetic background. The genes involved in testis development may function as growth regulators in the tissues in which they are active.     

Univalent sex chromosomes in spermatocytes of Sxr-carrying mice

Pachytene configurations of the sex chromosomes were studied in whole-mount, silver-stained preparations of spermatocytes in mice with XY,Sxr, XX,Sxr, XO,Sxr, XO,Sxr+5¹² and T(X;4)37H,YSxr chromosomes, and non-Sxr-carrying controls. XY,Sxr males showed an increased number of X and Y univalents and of self-synapsed Y chromosomes. In T(X;4)37H,YSxr males an increased proportion of trivalent+Y configurations was also accompanied by higher numbers of self-paired Y univalents; the proportion of trivalent+X⁴ was not increased, but that of self-synapsed X⁴ univalents was. There was more selfsynapsis in cells containing one univalent than in cells containing two univalents. Spermatocytes of XX,Sxr mice contained single univalent X, which was never seen to be self-synapsed, but self-synapsis of the X occurred in a proportion of cells in XO,Sxr males. There were no self-paired X chromosomes in the XO,Sxr+5¹² mouse although lowlevel pairing of the 5¹² chromosome occurred. All four XX,Sxr and XO,Sxr males contained testicular sperm, and testicular sperm were also present in one T(X;4)37H male, while another such male had sperm in the caput. It is concluded that (1) self-synapsis of univalents is affected by variable conditions in the cell as well as by the DNA sequences of the chromosome, and (2) that the level of achievable spermatogenesis is not always rigidly predetermined by a chromosome anomaly but can be modulated by the genetic background.     

An X-autosome fusion chromosome of Caenorhabditis elegans

Summary The translocation mnT12(IV;X) is a fusion of holocentric chromosomes IV and X, the breakpoints occurring near the left end of IV and the right end of X. Animals homozygous for mnT12 are viable and fertile; they contain five pairs of chromosomes rather than the normal set of six pairs. The mnT12 chromosome is larger than all wild-type chromosomes and thus identifies linkage groups IV and X cytologically. Hermaphrodites heterozygous for mnT12 show high frequency meiotic nondisjunction both between mnT12 and the X chromosome, which results in a high incidence of male self progeny (27% compared to the wild-type incidence of 0.2%), and between mnT12 and chromosome IV, which results in a high incidence of self progeny essentially trisomic for chromosome IV (karyotype IV/mnT12/mnT12). The viability of chromosome IV trisomics has been confirmed by constructing animals trisomic for only normal copies of chromosome IV; these animals are morphologically wild type. Meiotic chromosome disjunction in mnT12 homozygotes appears to be normal, although the frequency of recombination between markers that are normally X-linked is significantly reduced. Males of genotype IV/mnT12/0 are fertile. They can be thought of as having a neo-X(mnT12) neo-Y(normal IV) karyotype since it is possible to maintain a male-hermaphrodite stock of C. elegans consisting of such males and hermaphrodites carrying two neo-X chromosomes and no neo-Y; the organism is thus converted from an XO:XX type of sex determination to an XX:XX system.     

Polyploids and Sex Determination in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS

Tetraploid stocks of Caenorhabditis elegans var. Bristol carrying autosomal and X-linked markers have been produced. Tetraploid hermaphrodites fall into two categories: those that give about 1% male self-progeny and those that give 25 to 40% male self-progeny. The former are basically 4A;4X--four sets of autosomes and four sex chromosomes--and the latter are 4A;3X. Males are 4A;2X. (Diploid hermaphrodites are 2A;2X; males are 2A;1X.) Triploids were produced by crossing tetraploid hermaphrodites and diploid males. Triploids of composition 3A;3X are hermaphrodites; 3A;2X animals are fertile males. Different X-chromosome duplications were added to a 3A;2X chromosome constitution to increase the X-to-autosome ratio. Based on the resulting sexual phenotypes, we conclude that there exists on the C. elegans X chromosome at least three (and perhaps many more) dose-sensitive sites that act cumulatively in determining sex.     

More Sex-Determination Mutants of CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS

Sex determination in Caenorhabditis elegans is controlled by the X chromosome: autosome ratio, i.e. 2A;XX animals are hermaphrodite, and 2A;XO animals are male. A procedure for isolating 2A;XO animals that are transformed into hermaphrodites has been developed. Nine mutations causing this transformation have been obtained: eight are recessive, and all of these fall into a new autosomal complementation group, her-1 V. The remaining mutation (her-2) is dominant and has a genetic map location similar to that of tra-1 III. Recessive mutations of tra-1 cause the reverse transformation, transforming 2A;XX animals into males. Therefore, the her-2 mutation may result in constitutive expression of tra-1. Mutations in her-1 are without effect on XX animals, but the her-2 mutation prevents sperm production in both XX and XO animals, in addition to its effect on the sexual phenotype of XO animals. The epistatic relationships between tra and her genes are used to deduce a model for the action of these genes in controlling sex determination.     

The Dpy-30 Gene Encodes an Essential Component of the Caenorhabditis Elegans Dosage Compensation Machinery

The need to regulate X chromosome expression in Caenorhabditis elegans arises as a consequence of the primary sex-determining signal, the X/A ratio (the ratio of X chromosomes to sets of autosomes), which directs 1X/2A animals to develop as males and 2X/2A animals to develop as hermaphrodites. C. elegans possesses a dosage compensation mechanism that equalizes X chromosome expression between the two sexes despite their disparity in X chromosome dosage. Previous genetic analysis led to the identification of four autosomal genes, dpy-21, dpy-26, dpy-27 and dpy-28, whose products are essential in XX animals for proper dosage compensation, but not for sex determination. We report the identification and characterization of dpy-30, an essential component of the dosage compensation machinery. Putative null mutations in dpy-30 disrupt dosage compensation and cause a severe maternal-effect, XX-specific lethality. Rare survivors of the dpy-30 lethality are dumpy and express their X-linked genes at higher than wild-type levels. These dpy-30 mutant phenotypes superficially resemble those caused by mutations in dpy-26, dpy-27 and dpy-28; however, detailed phenotypic analysis reveals important differences that distinguish dpy-30 from these genes. In contrast to the XX-specific lethality caused by mutations in the other dpy genes, the XX-specific lethality caused by dpy-30 mutations is completely penetrant and temperature sensitive. In addition, unlike the other genes, dpy-30 is required for the normal development of XO animals. Although dpy-30 mutations do not significantly affect the viability of XO animals, they do cause them to be developmentally delayed and to possess numerous morphological and behavioral abnormalities. Finally, dpy-30 mutations can dramatically influence the choice of sexual fate in animals with an ambiguous sexual identity, despite having no apparent effect on the sexual phenotype of otherwise wild-type animals. Paradoxically, depending on the genetic background, dpy-30 mutations cause either masculinization or feminization, thus revealing the complex regulatory relationship between the sex determination and dosage compensation processes. The novel phenotypes caused by dpy-30 mutations suggest that in addition to acting in the dosage compensation process, dpy-30 may play a more general role in the development of both XX and XO animals.     

The etiology of maleness in XX men

Summary Information relating to the etiology of human XX males is reviewed. The lesser body height and smaller tooth size in comparison with control males and first-degree male relatives could imply that the patients never had any Y chromosome. Neither reports of occasional mitoses with a Y chromosome, nor of the occurrence of Y chromatin in Sertoli cells are convincing enough to support the idea that low-grade or circumscribed mosaicism is a common etiologic factor. Reports of an increase in length of one of the X chromosomes in XX males are few and some are conflicting. Nor is there any evidence to support the idea of loss of material. However, absence of visible cytogenetic alteration does not rule out the possibility of translocations, exchanges or deletions.A few familial cases are known. Mendelian gene mutations may account for a number of instances of XX males, similar genes being well known in several animal species. The existing geographical differences in the prevalence of human XX males could be explained by differences in gene frequency. But if gene mutation were a common cause of XX maleness there would be more familial cases.Any hypothesis explaining the etiology of XX males should take into account the following facts. There are at least 4 examples of XX males who have inherited the Xg allele carried by their fathers, and at least 9 of such males who have not. The frequency of the Xg phenotype among XX males is far closer to that of males than to that of females, while the absence of any color-blind XX males (among 40 tested) resembles the distribution in females. Furthermore, H-Y antigen is present in XX males, often at a strength intermediate between that in normal males and females. Finally, in a pedigree comprising three independently ascertained XX males, the mothers of all three are H-Y antigen-positive, and the pattern of inheritance of the antigen in two of them precludes X-chromosomal transmission.Many of the data are consistent with the hypothesis that XX males arise through interchange of the testic-determining gene on the Y chromosome and a portion of the X chromosome containing the Xg gene. However, actual evidence in favor of this hypothesis is still lacking, and the H-Y antigen data are not easy to explain. In contrast, if recent hypotheses on the mechanisms controlling the expression of H-Y antigen are confirmed, a gene exerting negative control on testis determination would be located near the end of of the short arm of the X chromosome. This putative gene is believed not to be inactivated in normal females, for at least two other genes located in the same region, i.e. Xg and steroid sulfatase, are not. Deletion or inactivation of these loci would explain how XX males arise and would be consistent with most, but not all, the facts.There is yet no single hypothesis that by itself can explain all the facts accumulated about XX males. While mosaicism appears very unlikely in most cases, Mendelian gene mutation, translocation, X-Y interchange, a minute deletion or preferential inactivation of an X chromosome, or part thereof, remain possible. The etiology of XX maleness may well be heterogeneous.