AtPRD1 is required for meiotic double strand break formation in Arabidopsis thaliana

The initiation of meiotic recombination by the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) catalysed by the Spo11 protein is strongly evolutionary conserved. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Spo11 requires nine other proteins for meiotic DSB formation, but, unlike Spo11, few of these proteins seem to be conserved across kingdoms. In order to investigate this recombination step in higher eukaryotes, we have isolated a new gene, AtPRD1, whose mutation affects meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. In Atprd1 mutants, meiotic recombination rates fall dramatically, early recombination markers (e.g., DMC1 foci) are absent, but meiosis progresses until achiasmatic univalents are formed. Besides, Atprd1 mutants suppress DSB repair defects of a large range of meiotic mutants, showing that AtPRD1 is involved in meiotic recombination and is required for meiotic DSB formation. Furthermore, we showed that AtPRD1 and AtSPO11-1 interact in a yeast two-hybrid assay, suggesting that AtPRD1 could be a partner of AtSPO11-1. Moreover, our study reveals similarity between AtPRD1 and the mammalian protein Mei1, suggesting that AtPRD1 could be a Mei1 functional homologue.     

Have a break: determinants of meiotic DNA double strand break (DSB) formation and processing in plants

Meiosis is an essential process for sexually reproducing organisms, leading to the formation of specialized generative cells. This review intends to highlight current knowledge of early events during meiosis derived from various model organisms, including plants. It will particularly focus on cis- and trans-requirements of meiotic DNA double strand break (DSB) formation, a hallmark event during meiosis and a prerequisite for recombination of genetic traits. Proteins involved in DSB formation in different organisms, emphasizing the known factors from plants, will be introduced and their functions outlined. Recent technical advances in DSB detection and meiotic recombination analysis will be reviewed, as these new tools now allow analysis of early meiotic recombination in plants with incredible accuracy. To anticipate future directions in plant meiosis research, unpublished results will be included wherever possible.     

Molecular mechanisms of double strand break repair in eukaryotes

Genome stability is of primary importance for the survival and for the proper functioning of all organisms. Double strand breaks (DSBs) arise spontaneously during growth, or can be created by external insults. In response to even a single DSB, organisms must trigger series of events to promote repair of the DNA damage in order to survive and restore chromosome integrity. In doing so, cells must regulate a fine balance between potentially competing DSB repair pathways. Much of what we know today on the mechanisms of repair in eukaryotes come from studies carried out in budding yeast. In this review, the main attention is focused on exciting new work eminating from yeast research that provides fresh insights into the DSB repair process.     

DNA double strand break repair in mammalian cells

Human cells can process DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by either homology directed or non-homologous repair pathways. Defects in components of DSB repair pathways are associated with a predisposition to cancer. The products of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which normally confer protection against breast cancer, are involved in homology-directed DSB repair. Defects in another homology-directed pathway, single-strand annealing, are associated with genome instability and cancer predisposition in the Nijmegen breakage syndrome and a radiation-sensitive ataxia-telangiectasia-like syndrome. Many DSB repair proteins also participate in the signaling pathways which underlie the cell's response to DSBs.     

DNA repair patch-mediated double strand DNA break formation in human cells

To investigate the mechanism of double strand DNA break formation in mammalian cells, an in vitro assay was established using closed circular DNA containing two uracils on opposite DNA strands (18 and 30 base pairs apart) and extracts prepared from human cells. In this assay, formation of double strand breaks was detected by the conversion of circular DNA to linear DNA. Approximately 4-fold more double strand DNA breaks were produced by extracts from cells deficient in DNA ligase I (46BR) relative to those produced by extracts from control cells (MRC5, derived from a clinically normal individual). In parallel with the amount of double strand DNA breaks, extracts from 46BR cells produced longer repair patches (up to 24 bases in length) than those from MRC5 cells (typically <5 bases long). When purified DNA ligase I was added to 46BR extracts to complement the DNA ligase deficiency, only a negligible difference was found between the amount of doublestrand DNA breaks or the repair patch size generated in the assay relative to MRC5 extracts. Together, our data demonstrate that double strand DNA breaks are produced through formation of DNA repair patches. We refer to this process of double strand break formation as the "DNA repair patch-mediated pathway."     

Roles of chromatin remodellers in DNA double strand break repair

Now that we have a good understanding of the DNA double strand break (DSB) repair mechanisms and DSB-induced damage signalling, attention is focusing on the changes to the chromatin environment needed for efficient DSB repair. Mutations in chromatin remodelling complexes have been identified in cancers, making it important to evaluate how they impact upon genomic stability. Our current understanding of the DSB repair pathways suggests that each one has distinct requirements for chromatin remodelling. Moreover, restricting the extent of chromatin modifications could be a significant factor regulating the decision of pathway usage. In this review, we evaluate the distinct DSB repair pathways for their potential need for chromatin remodelling and review the roles of ATP-driven chromatin remodellers in the pathways.     

RecQ helicases in DNA double strand break repair and telomere maintenance

Organisms are constantly exposed to various environmental insults which could adversely affect the stability of their genome. To protect their genomes against the harmful effect of these environmental insults, organisms have evolved highly diverse and efficient repair mechanisms. Defective DNA repair processes can lead to various kinds of chromosomal and developmental abnormalities. RecQ helicases are a family of evolutionarily conserved, DNA unwinding proteins which are actively engaged in various DNA metabolic processes, telomere maintenance and genome stability. Bacteria and lower eukaryotes, like yeast, have only one RecQ homolog, whereas higher eukaryotes including humans possess multiple RecQ helicases. These multiple RecQ helicases have redundant and/or non-redundant functions depending on the types of DNA damage and DNA repair pathways. Humans have five different RecQ helicases and defects in three of them cause autosomal recessive diseases leading to various kinds of cancer predisposition and/or aging phenotypes. Emerging evidence also suggests that the RecQ helicases have important roles in telomere maintenance. This review mainly focuses on recent knowledge about the roles of RecQ helicases in DNA double strand break repair and telomere maintenance which are important in preserving genome integrity.     

Mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair and chromosome aberration formation

It is widely accepted that unrepaired or misrepaired DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) lead to the formation of chromosome aberrations. DSBs induced in the DNA of higher eukaryotes by endogenous processes or exogenous agents can in principle be repaired either by non-homologous endjoining (NHEJ), or homology directed repair (HDR). The basis on which the selection of the DSB repair pathway is made remains unknown but may depend on the inducing agent, or process. Evaluation of the relative contribution of NHEJ and HDR specifically to the repair of ionizing radiation (IR) induced DSBs is important for our understanding of the mechanisms leading to chromosome aberration formation. Here, we review recent work from our laboratories contributing to this line of inquiry. Analysis of DSB rejoining in irradiated cells using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis reveals a fast component operating with half times of 10-30 min. This component of DSB rejoining is severely compromised in cells with mutations in DNA-PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, or XRCC4, as well as after chemical inhibition of DNA-PK, indicating that it reflects classical NHEJ; we termed this form of DSB rejoining D-NHEJ to signify its dependence on DNA-PK. Although chemical inhibition, or mutation, in any of these factors delays processing, cells ultimately remove the majority of DSBs using an alternative pathway operating with slower kinetics (half time 2-10 h). This alternative, slow pathway of DSB rejoining remains unaffected in mutants deficient in several genes of the RAD52 epistasis group, suggesting that it may not reflect HDR. We proposed that it reflects an alternative form of NHEJ that operates as a backup (B-NHEJ) to the DNA-PK-dependent (D-NHEJ) pathway. Biochemical studies confirm the presence in cell extracts of DNA end joining activities operating in the absence of DNA-PK and indicate the dominant role for D-NHEJ, when active. These observations in aggregate suggest that NHEJ, operating via two complementary pathways, B-NHEJ and D-NHEJ, is the main mechanism through which IR-induced DSBs are removed from the DNA of higher eukaryotes. HDR is considered to either act on a small fraction of IR induced DSBs, or to engage in the repair process at a step after the initial end joining. We propose that high speed D-NHEJ is an evolutionary development in higher eukaryotes orchestrated around the newly evolved DNA-PKcs and pre-existing factors. It achieves within a few minutes restoration of chromosome integrity through an optimized synapsis mechanism operating by a sequence of protein-protein interactions in the context of chromatin and the nuclear matrix. As a consequence D-NHEJ mostly joins the correct DNA ends and suppresses the formation of chromosome aberrations, albeit, without ensuring restoration of DNA sequence around the break. B-NHEJ is likely to be an evolutionarily older pathway with less optimized synapsis mechanisms that rejoins DNA ends with kinetics of several hours. The slow kinetics and suboptimal synapsis mechanisms of B-NHEJ allow more time for exchanges through the joining of incorrect ends and cause the formation of chromosome aberrations in wild type and D-NHEJ mutant cells.     

Targeting the DNA double strand break repair machinery in prostate cancer

Regardless of the achievable remissions with first line hormone therapy in patients with prostate cancer (CaP), the disease escapes the hormone dependent stage to a more aggressive status where chemotherapy is the only effective treatment and no treatment is curative. This makes it very important to identify new targets that can improve the outcome of treatment. ATM and DNA-PK are the two kinases responsible for signalling and repairing double strand breaks (DSB). Thus, both kinases are pertinent targets in CaP treatment to enhance the activity of the numerous DNA DSB inducing agents used in CaP treatment such as ionizing radiation (IR). Colony formation assay was used to assess the sensitivity of hormone dependent, p53 wt (LNCaP) and hormone independent p53 mutant (PC3) CaP cell lines to the cytotoxic effect of IR and Doxorubicin in the presence or absence of Ku55933 and NU7441 which are small molecule inhibitors of ATM and DNA-PK, respectively. Flow cytometry based methods were used to assess the effect of the two inhibitors on cell cycle, apoptosis and H2AX foci formation. Neutral comet assay was used to assess the induction of DNA DSBs. Ku55933 or NU7441 alone increased the sensitivity of CaP cell lines to the DNA damaging agents, however combining both inhibitors together resulted in further enhancement of sensitivity. The cell cycle profile of both cell lines was altered with increased cell death, DNA DSBs and H2AX foci formation. This study justifies further evaluation of the ATM and DNA-PK inhibitors for clinical application in CaP patients. Additionally, the augmented effect resulting from combining both inhibitors may have a significant implication for the treatment of CaP patients who have a defect in one of the two DSB repair pathways.     

DNA double strand break repair: Zooming in on the focus

Comment on: Pseudo-DNA damage response in senescent cells. Pospelova T, et al. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:In press.     

A DNA double strand break repair defect in Fanconi anemia fibroblasts

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a heterogeneous autosomal recessive disease characterized by congenital abnormalities, pancytopenia, and an increased incidence of cancer. Cells cultured from FA patients display elevated spontaneous chromosomal breaks and deletions and are hypersensitive to bifunctional cross-linking agents. Thus, it has been hypothesized that FA is a DNA repair disorder. We analyzed plasmid end-joining in intact diploid fibroblast cells derived from FA patients. FA fibroblasts from complementation groups A, C, D2, and G rejoined linearized plasmids with a significantly decreased efficiency compared with non-FA fibroblasts. Retrovirus-mediated expression of the respective FA cDNAs in FA cells restored their end-joining efficiency to wild type levels. Human FA fibroblasts and fibroblasts from FA rodent models were also significantly more sensitive to restriction enzyme-induced chromosomal DNA double strand breaks than were their retrovirally corrected counterparts. Taken together, these data show that FA fibroblasts have a deficiency in both extra-chromosomal and chromosomal DNA double strand break repair, a defect that could provide an attractive explanation for some of the pathologies associated with FA.     

Chromatin structure in double strand break repair

Cells are under constant assault by endogenous and environmental DNA damaging agents. DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) sever entire chromosomes and pose a major threat to genome integrity as a result of chromosomal fragment loss or chromosomal rearrangements. Exogenous factors such as ionizing radiation, crosslinking agents, and topoisomerase poisons, contribute to break formation. DSBs are associated with oxidative metabolism, form during the normal S phase, when replication forks collapse and are generated during physiological processes such as V(D)J recombination, yeast mating type switching and meiosis. It is estimated that in mammalian cells ∼10 DSBs per cell are formed daily. If left unrepaired DSBs can lead to cell death or deregulated growth, and cancer development. Cellular response to DSB damage includes mechanisms to halt the progression of the cell cycle and to restore the structure of the broken chromosome. Changes in chromatin adjacent to DNA break sites are instrumental to the DNA damage response (DDR) with two apparent ends: to control compaction and to bind repair and signaling molecules to the lesion. Here, we review the key findings related to each of these functions and examine their cross-talk.     

Rapid repair of DNA double strand breaks in Arabidopsis thaliana is dependent on proteins involved in chromosome structure maintenance

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most cytotoxic forms of DNA damage and must be repaired by recombination, predominantly via non-homologous joining of DNA ends (NHEJ) in higher eukaryotes. However, analysis of DSB repair kinetics of plant NHEJ mutants atlig4-4 and atku80 with the neutral comet assay shows that alternative DSB repair pathways are active. Surprisingly, these kinetic measurements show that DSB repair was faster in the NHEJ mutant lines than in wild-type Arabidopsis.Here we provide the first characterization of this KU-independent, rapid DSB repair pathway operating in Arabidopsis. The alternate pathway that rapidly removes the majority of DSBs present in nuclear DNA depends upon structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex proteins, namely MIM/AtRAD18 and AtRAD21.1. An absolute requirement for SMC proteins and kleisin for rapid repair of DSBs in Arabidopsis opens new insight into the mechanism of DSB removal in plants.     

DNA double strand break responses and chromatin alterations within the aging cell

Cellular senescence is a state of permanent replicative arrest that allows cells to stay viable and metabolically active but resistant to apoptotic and mitogenic stimuli. Specific, validated markers can identify senescent cells, including senescence-associated β galactosidase activity, chromatin alterations, cell morphology changes, activated p16- and p53-dependent signaling and permanent cell cycle arrest. Senescence is a natural consequence of DNA replication-associated telomere erosion, but can also be induced prematurely by telomere-independent events such as failure to repair DNA double strand breaks. Here, we review the molecular pathways of senescence onset, focussing on the changes in chromatin organization that are associated with cellular senescence, particularly senescence-associated heterochromatin foci formation. We also discuss the altered dynamics of the DNA double strand break response within the context of aging cells. Appreciating how, mechanistically, cellular senescence is induced, and how changes to chromatin organization and DNA repair contributes to this, is fundamental to our understanding of the normal and premature human aging processes associated with loss of organ and tissue function in humans.     

Arabidopsis DNA ligase IV is induced by gamma-irradiation and interacts with an Arabidopsis homologue of the double strand break repair protein XRCC4

Rejoining of single- and double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced in DNA during replication, recombination, and DNA damage is catalysed by DNA ligase enzymes. Eukaryotes possess multiple DNA ligase enzymes, each having distinct roles in cellular metabolism. Double-strand breaks in DNA, which can occur spontaneously in the cell or be induced experimentally by gamma-irradiation, represent one of the most serious threats to genomic integrity. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) rather than homologous recombination is the major pathway for repair of DSBs in organisms with complex genomes, including humans and plants. DNA ligase IV in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and humans catalyses the final step in the NHEJ pathway of DSB repair. In this study we identify an Arabidopsis thaliana homologue (AtLIG4) of human and S. cerevisiae DNA ligase IV which is shown to encode an ATP-dependent DNA ligase with a theoretical molecular mass of 138 kDa and 48% similarity in amino-acid sequence to the human DNA ligase IV. Yeast two-hybrid analysis demonstrated a strong interaction between A. thaliana DNA ligase IV and the A. thaliana homologue of the human DNA ligase IV-binding protein XRCC4. This interaction is shown to be mediated via the tandem BRCA C-terminal domains of A. thaliana DNA ligase IV protein. Expression of AtLIG4 is induced by gamma-irradiation but not by UVB irradiation, consistent with an in vivo role for the A. thaliana DNA ligase IV in DSB repair.     

Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana

Meiosis is a central feature of sexual reproduction. Studies in plants have made and continue to make an important contribution to fundamental research aimed at the understanding of this complex process. Moreover, homologous recombination during meiosis provides the basis for plant breeders to create new varieties of crops. The increasing global demand for food, combined with the challenges from climate change, will require sustained efforts in crop improvement. An understanding of the factors that control meiotic recombination has the potential to make an important contribution to this challenge by providing the breeder with the means to make fuller use of the genetic variability that is available within crop species. Cytogenetic studies in plants have provided considerable insights into chromosome organization and behaviour during meiosis. More recently, studies, predominantly in Arabidopsis thaliana, are providing important insights into the genes and proteins that are required for crossover formation during plant meiosis. As a result, substantial progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underpin meiosis in plants has begun to emerge. This article summarizes current progress in the understanding of meiotic recombination and its control in Arabidopsis. We also assess the relationship between meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis and other eukaryotes, highlighting areas of close similarity and apparent differences.     

Nijmegen breakage syndrome: consequences of defective DNA double strand break repair

The autosomal recessive genetic disorder, Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome, is characterised by an excessively high risk for the development of lymphatic tumours and an extreme sensitivity towards ionising radiation. The most likely explanation for these characteristics, a deficiency in the repair of DNA lesions, has been greatly substantiated by the recent cloning of the gene mutated in Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome patients and the analysis of its protein product, nibrin. The direct involvement of this protein in the processing of DNA double strand breaks caused by ionising radiation and those also necessary for normal DNA metabolism can be correlated with many of the cellular and clinical aspects of the disease, including the cancer predisposition of patients and their heterozygous relatives. BioEssays 21:649–656, 1999. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A PIAS-ed view of DNA double strand break repair focuses on SUMO

Through the action of multiple sensors, mediators, and effectors, the DNA damage response (DDR) orchestrates the repair of DNA damage to ensure maintenance of genomic integrity. Recently, in addition to phosphorylation, other post-translational modifications such as ubiquitylation and SUMOylation have emerged as important regulators of the DDR network. Two recent papers highlight the importance of SUMO modifications of proteins that execute the response to DNA damage.