Receptor tyrosine kinase activation: From the ligand perspective

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are single-span transmembrane receptors in which relatively conserved intracellular kinase domains are coupled to divergent extracellular modules. The extracellular domains initiate receptor signaling upon binding to either soluble or membrane-embedded ligands. The diversity of extracellular domain structures allows for coupling of many unique signaling inputs to intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation. The combinatorial power of this receptor system is further increased by the fact that multiple ligands can typically interact with the same receptor. Such ligands often act as biased agonists and initiate distinct signaling responses via activation of the same receptor. Mechanisms behind such biased agonism are largely unknown for RTKs, especially at the level of receptor–ligand complex structure. Using recent progress in understanding the structures of active RTK signaling units, we discuss selected mechanisms by which ligands couple receptor activation to distinct signaling outputs.     

Conserved motifs in somatostatin,D2-dopamine,and alpha 2B-adrenergic receptors for inhibiting the Na-H exchanger,NHE1

Receptor subtypes within families of G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by similar ligands can regulate distinct intracellular effectors. We identified conserved motifs within intracellular domains 2 and 3 of selective subtypes of several G protein-coupled receptor families that confer coupling to the Na-H exchanger, NHE1. A T(s,p)V motif within intracellular domain 2 and a QQ(r) motif within intracellular domain 3 are shared by the somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR1, -3, and -4, which couple to the inhibition of NHE1, but not by SSTR2 and -5, which do not signal to NHE1. Only the collective substitution of cognate SSTR2 residues with these two motifs conferred the ability of mutant SSTR2 to inhibit NHE1. Both motifs are present in D(2)-dopamine receptors, which inhibit NHE1, and in alpha(2B)-adrenergic receptors, which couple to the inhibition of NHE1, but not in alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptors, which do not regulate NHE1. These findings indicate that motifs shared by different subfamilies of G protein-coupled receptors, but not necessarily by receptor subtypes within a subfamily, can confer coupling to a common effector.     

Recognition in the face of diversity: interactions of heterotrimeric G proteins and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases with activated GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest class of integral membrane protein receptors in the human genome. Despite the great diversity of ligands that activate these GPCRs, they interact with a relatively small number of intracellular proteins to induce profound physiological change. Both heterotrimeric G proteins and GPCR kinases are well known for their ability to specifically recognize GPCRs in their active state. Recent structural studies now suggest that heterotrimeric G proteins and GPCR kinases identify activated receptors via a common molecular mechanism despite having completely different folds.     

Extension of Drosophila melanogaster life span with a GPCR peptide inhibitor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate signaling from extracellular ligands to intracellular signal transduction proteins. Methuselah (Mth) is a class B (secretin-like) GPCR, a family typified by their large, ligand-binding, N-terminal extracellular domains. Downregulation of mth increases the life span of Drosophila melanogaster; inhibitors of Mth signaling should therefore enhance longevity. We used mRNA display selection to identify high-affinity (K(d) = 15 to 30 nM) peptide ligands that bind to the N-terminal ectodomain of Mth. The selected peptides are potent antagonists of Mth signaling, and structural studies suggest that they perturb the interface between the Mth ecto- and transmembrane domains. Flies constitutively expressing a Mth antagonist peptide have a robust life span extension, which suggests that the peptides inhibit Mth signaling in vivo. Our work thus provides new life span-extending ligands for a metazoan and a general approach for the design of modulators of this important class of GPCRs.     

Splice variants of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are encoded by a vast gene superfamily, reflecting the large number of ligands that must be specifically recognized at any given cell surface. The discovery that the variety of GPCRs is further expanded through the generation of splice variants was therefore somewhat surprising. Studies of the functional consequences of alternative splicing have focused on ligand binding, signaling, constitutive activity, and downregulation. However, GPCRs also appear to interact directly with many other intracellular proteins in addition to G proteins. Intriguingly, the domains involved in these interactions are the predominant sites of variation arising through splicing.     

Clathrin-dependent mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis

The heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family includes approximately 900 members and is the largest family of signaling receptors encoded in the mammalian genome. G protein-coupled receptors elicit cellular responses to diverse extracellular stimuli at the plasma membrane and some internalized receptors continue to signal from intracellular compartments. In addition to rapid desensitization, receptor trafficking is critical for regulation of the temporal and spatial aspects of GPCR signaling. Indeed, GPCR internalization functions to control signal termination and propagation as well as receptor resensitization. Our knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate mammalian GPCR endocytosis is based predominantly on arrestin regulation of receptors through a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent pathway. However, multiple clathrin adaptors, which recognize distinct endocytic signals, are now known to function in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of diverse cargo. Given the vast number and diversity of GPCRs, the complexity of clathrin-mediated endocytosis and the discovery of multiple clathrin adaptors, a single universal mechanism controlling endocytosis of all mammalian GPCRs is unlikely. Indeed, several recent studies now suggest that endocytosis of different GPCRs is regulated by distinct mechanisms and clathrin adaptors. In this review, we discuss the diverse mechanisms that regulate clathrin-dependent GPCR endocytosis.     

Signaling through G protein coupled receptors

Heterotrimeric G proteins (Gα, Gβ/Gγ subunits) constitute one of the most important components of cell signaling cascade. G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) perceive many extracellular signals and transduce them to heterotrimeric G proteins, which further transduce these signals intracellular to appropriate downstream effectors and thereby play an important role in various signaling pathways. GPCRs exist as a superfamily of integral membrane protein receptors that contain seven transmembrane α-helical regions, which bind to a wide range of ligands. Upon activation by a ligand, the GPCR undergoes a conformational change and then activate the G proteins by promoting the exchange of GDP/GTP associated with the Gα subunit. This leads to the dissociation of Gβ/Gγ dimer from Gα. Both these moieties then become free to act upon their downstream effectors and thereby initiate unique intracellular signaling responses. After the signal propagation, the GTP of Gα-GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP and Gα becomes inactive (Gα-GDP), which leads to its re-association with the Gβ/Gγ dimer to form the inactive heterotrimeric complex. The GPCR can also transduce the signal through G protein independent pathway. GPCRs also regulate cell cycle progression. Till to date thousands of GPCRs are known from animal kingdom with little homology among them, but only single GPCR has been identified in plant system. The Arabidopsis GPCR was reported to be cell cycle regulated and also involved in ABA and in stress signaling. Here I have described a general mechanism of signal transduction through GPCR/G proteins, structure of GPCRs, family of GPCRs and plant GPCR and its role.Key words: heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCRs, seven-transmembrane receptors, signal transduction, stress signaling     

Proteomic Response of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells to Histamine Stimulation

The histamine receptors (HRs) represent a subclass of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) and comprise four subtypes. Due to their numerous physiological and pathological effects, HRs are popular drug targets for the treatment of allergic reactions or the regulation of gastric acid secretion. Hence, an understanding of the functional selectivity of HR ligands has gained importance. These ligands can bind to specific GPCRs and selectively activate defined pathways. Supporting the activation of a therapeutically necessary pathway without the activation of other signaling cascades can result in drugs with more specific activity and fewer side effects. To evaluate the cellular consequences resulting from receptor binding, comprehensive analyses of cellular protein alterations upon incubation with ligands are required. For this purpose, endothelial cells are treated with histamine, as the endogenous ligand of HRs, to obtain a global overview of its cellular effects. Quantitative proteomics and pathway analyses of histamine‐treated and untreated cells reveal enrichment of the nuclear factor‐κB and tumor necrosis factor signaling pathways, cytokine?cytokine receptor interactions, complement and coagulation cascades, and acute inflammatory processes upon histamine treatment. This strategy offers the opportunity to monitor HR‐mediated signaling in a multidimensional manner.     

Biased Signaling at Chemokine Receptors

The ability of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to activate selective signaling pathways according to the conformation stabilized by bound ligands (signaling bias) is a challenging concept in the GPCR field. Signaling bias has been documented for several GPCRs, including chemokine receptors. However, most of these studies examined the global signaling bias between G protein- and arrestin-dependent pathways, leaving unaddressed the potential bias between particular G protein subtypes. Here, we investigated the coupling selectivity of chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 in response to various ligands with G protein subtypes by using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer biosensors monitoring directly the activation of G proteins. We also compared data obtained with the G protein biosensors with those obtained with other functional readouts, such as β-arrestin-2 recruitment, cAMP accumulation, and calcium mobilization assays. We showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 activated the three Gα_i subtypes (Gα_i1, Gα_i2, and Gα_i3) and the two Gα_o isoforms (Gα_oa and Gα_ob) with potencies that generally correlate to their binding affinities. In addition, we showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR5 and CCR2 also activated Gα₁₂, but not Gα₁₃. For each receptor, we showed that the relative potency of various agonist chemokines was not identical in all assays, supporting the notion that signaling bias exists at chemokine receptors.     

Biased signaling in naturally occurring mutations of G protein-coupled receptors associated with diverse human diseases

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play critical roles in transmitting a variety of extracellular signals into the cells and regulate diverse physiological functions. Naturally occurring mutations that result in dysfunctions of GPCRs have been known as the causes of numerous diseases. Significant progresses have been made in elucidating the pathophysiology of diseases caused by mutations. The multiple intracellular signaling pathways, such as G protein-dependent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling, in conjunction with recent advances on biased agonism, have broadened the view on the molecular mechanism of disease pathogenesis. This review aims to briefly discuss biased agonism of GPCRs (biased ligands and biased receptors), summarize the naturally occurring GPCR mutations that cause biased signaling, and propose the potential pathophysiological relevance of biased mutant GPCRs associated with various endocrine diseases.     

Structural determinants for ligand-receptor conformational selection in a peptide G protein-coupled receptor

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate the majority of physiological processes through specific intermolecular interactions with structurally diverse ligands and activation of differential intracellular signaling. A key issue yet to be resolved is how GPCRs developed selectivity and diversity of ligand binding and intracellular signaling during evolution. We have explored the structural basis of selectivity of naturally occurring gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRHs) from different species in the single functional human GnRH receptor. We found that the highly variable amino acids in position 8 of the naturally occurring isoforms of GnRH play a discriminating role in selecting receptor conformational states. The human GnRH receptor has a higher affinity for the cognate GnRH I but a lower affinity for GnRH II and GnRHs from other species possessing substitutions for Arg(8). The latter were partial agonists in the human GnRH receptor. Mutation of Asn(7.45) in transmembrane domain (TM) 7 had no effect on GnRH I affinity but specifically increased affinity for other GnRHs and converted them to full agonists. Using molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that the highly conserved Asn(7.45) makes intramolecular interactions with a highly conserved Cys(6.47) in TM 6, suggesting that disruption of this intramolecular interaction induces a receptor conformational change which allosterically alters ligand specific binding sites and changes ligand selectivity and signaling efficacy. These results reveal GnRH ligand and receptor structural elements for conformational selection, and support co-evolution of GnRH ligand and receptor conformations.     

G protein mediated signaling pathways in lysophospholipid induced cell proliferation and survival

Agonist activation of a subset of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) stimulates cell proliferation, mimicking the better known effects of tyrosine kinase growth factors. Cell survival or apoptosis is also regulated via pathways initiated by stimulation of these same GPCRs. This review focuses on aspects of signaling by the lysophospholipid mediators, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), and sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P), which make these agonists uniquely capable of modulating cell growth and survival. The general features of GPCR coupling to specific G proteins, downstream effectors and signaling cascades are first reviewed. GPCR coupling to G(i) and Ras/MAPK or to G(q) and phospholipase generated second messengers are insufficient to regulate cell proliferation while G(12/13)/Rho engagement provides additional complementary signals required for cell proliferation. Survival is best predicted by coupling to G(i) pathways that regulate PI3K and Akt, but other signals generated through different G protein pathways are also implicated. The unique ability of LPA and S1P to concomitantly stimulate G(i), G(q), and G(12/13) pathways, given the proper complement of expressed LPA or S1P receptors, allows these receptors to support cell survival and proliferation. In pathophysiological situations, e.g., vascular disease, cancer, brain injury, and inflammation, components of the signaling cascade downstream of lysophospholipid receptors, in particular those involving Ras or Rho, may be altered. In addition, up or downregulation of LPA or S1P receptor subtypes, altering their ratio, and increased availability of the lysophospholipid ligands at sites of injury or inflammation, likely contribute to disease and may be important targets for therapeutic intervention.     

Signal transduction by the chemokine receptor CXCR5: structural requirements for G protein activation analyzed by chimeric CXCR1/CXCR5 molecules.

The human chemokine receptors CXCR5 and CXCR1 activate signaling pathways via pertussis toxin-sensitive as well as insensitive G proteins. CXCR5 induces Ca2+ signaling and chemotaxis independently of inhibitory G proteins, whereas the same signaling pathways are entirely dependent on inhibitory G proteins for CXCR1. In contrast, activation of the MAP kinase cascade via ERK1/2 is a pertussis toxin-sensitive signaling event for both receptors. Using chimeric CXCR1/CXCR5 receptors we investigated structural requirements for the activation of signal transduction pathways by CXCR5. Individual or multiple intracellular domains of CXCR1 were exchanged for the corresponding sequences of CXCR5, leading to receptors resembling CXCR5 at the cytoplasmic surface to a varying extent. Replacing the second intracellular domain of CXCR1 had a major influence on signaling mediated by inhibitory G proteins, whereas the exchange of the third or carboxy-terminal intracellular domain had only minor effects on signal transduction. Activation of the MAP kinase cascade via ERK1/2 and chemotaxis are largely reduced in chimeras comprising the second intracellular domain of CXCR5, although coupling to inhibitory G proteins is retained in all chimeric receptors. In summary, these data characterize the contribution of the intracellular domains of CXCR5 to receptor signaling, thereby disclosing unique structural requirements that modulate G protein coupling by the receptor.     

Epididymal G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR): two hats and a two-piece suit tailored at the GPS motif

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in cell recognition and signaling and their function has been experimentally determined by ligand activation and site-directed mutagenesis. Structurally, GPCRs consist of an extracellular N-terminus and an intracellular C-terminus separated by seven helical transmembrane domains (TM7). The extracellular region is highly glycosylated. The intracellular region binds to G proteins. An epididymal GPCR, designated HE6 (for human epididymis-specific protein 6), is present in the stereocilia projecting from the apical domain of principal cells into the epididymal lumen. In conceptual terms, HE6 wears two hats: an unusually long extracellular region characteristic of cell adhesion proteins, and an intracellular region with binding affinity to G protein. The binding partner to the long extracellular region has not been identified. HE6 has another remarkable feature comparable to the GPCR calcium-independent receptor of alpha-latrotoxin, designated CIRL. Both HE6 and CIRL are endogenously cleaved into two pieces at the GPCR proteolytic site (GPS) located adjacent to TM1, the first of the seven transmembrane helices. One fragment of the heterodimer wears the cell adhesion hat; the other retains the typical characteristics of GPCRs. This proteolytic processing may be regarded as a mechanism of molecular compartmentalization of cell adhesion and G protein activation functions. The latter may engage a beta-arrestin-driven endocytic trafficking mechanism independent from the adhesive properties of the mucin extracellular domain. It is also conceivable that events taking place in the epididymal lumen can be surveyed by the long adhesive rod and subsequently coupled inside principal cells to a signaling cascade.     

The expanding repertoire of receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) function

Receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) associate with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) at the plasma membrane and together bind a variety of peptide ligands, serving as a communication interface between the extracellular and intracellular environments. The collection of RAMP-interacting GPCRs continues to expand and now consists of GPCRs from families A, B and C, suggesting that RAMP activity is extremely prevalent. RAMP association with GPCRs can regulate GPCR function by altering ligand binding, receptor trafficking and desensitization, and downstream signaling pathways. Here, we elaborate on these RAMP-dependent mechanisms of GPCR regulation, which provide opportunities for pharmacological intervention.     

Functional selectivity of adenosine A1 receptor ligands?

The concept of functional selectivity offers great potential for the development of drugs that selectively activate a specific intracellular signaling pathway. During the last few years, it has become possible to systematically analyse compound libraries on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for this ‘biased’ form of signaling. We screened over 800 compounds targeting the class of adenosine A₁ receptors using a β-arrestin-mediated signaling assay in U2OS cells as a G protein-independent readout for GPCR activation. A selection of compounds was further analysed in a G protein-mediated GTPγS assay. Additionally, receptor affinity of these compounds was determined in a radioligand binding assay with the agonist [³H]CCPA. Of all compounds tested, only LUF5589 9 might be considered as functionally selective for the G protein-dependent pathway, particularly in view of a likely overestimation of β-arrestin signaling in the U2OS cells. Altogether, our study shows that functionally selective ligands for the adenosine A₁ receptor are rare, if existing at all. A thorough analysis of biased signaling on other GPCRs also reveals that only very few compounds can be considered functionally selective. This might indicate that the concept of functional selectivity is less common than speculated.     

Integrin regulation

Integrin signaling is bidirectional. 'Inside-out' signals regulate integrin affinity for adhesive ligands, and ligand-dependent 'outside-in' signals regulate cellular responses to adhesion. Integrin extracellular domains are yielding to high-resolution structural analyses, and intracellular proteins involved in integrin signaling are being identified. However, a key unresolved question is how integrins propagate signals across the plasma membrane.     

The G betagamma dimer as a novel source of selectivity in G-protein signaling: GGL-ing at convention

Heterotrimeric G proteins relay information between cell surface receptors and effector molecules in diverse signaling pathways to mediate critical cellular processes in both physiologic and pathologic conditions. Multiple isoforms of each of the three G protein subunits yield enormous structural and functional diversity. G proteins are thus obvious molecular targets for the therapeutic manipulation of signaling pathways. Their ubiquity among a vast array of G protein-coupled receptor pathways, however, may at first seem to threaten the attractiveness of G proteins as drug targets for specific signaling processes; in order for G proteins to be effective targets, some degree of selectivity must be defined and exploited. Although a great deal has been determined about the functional selectivity of G alpha subunits, relatively little is known regarding G betagamma selectivity. In this review, we discuss functional diversity among G betagamma subunits in both receptor coupling and effector activation. The novel functions of G beta(5), in complex with proteins of the GGL domain-containing R7 subfamily of regulators of G protein signaling, are discussed in detail, with specific focus on the potential of the G beta(5)-RGS9-2 pair as a therapeutic target in Parkinson's disease.     

Novel roles for arrestins in the post-endocytic trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane signaling molecules in the human genome. As such, they interact with numerous intracellular molecules, which can act either to propagate or curtail signaling from the receptor. Their primary mode of cellular activation occurs through heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn can activate a wide spectrum of effector molecules, including phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, adenylyl cyclases and ion channels. Active GPCRs are also the target of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which phosphorylate the receptors culminating in the binding of the protein arrestin. This results in rapid desensitization through inhibition of G protein binding, as well as novel mechanisms of cellular activation that involve the scaffolding of cellular kinases to GPCR-arrestin complexes. Arrestins can also serve to mediate the internalization of certain GPCRs, a process which plays an important role in regulating cellular activity both by mediating long-term desensitization through down regulation (degradation) of receptors and by recycling desensitized receptors back to the cell surface to initiate additional rounds of signaling. The mechanisms that regulate the subsequent intracellular trafficking of GPCRs following internalization are largely unknown. Recently however, it has become clear that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation and subsequent binding of arrestin play a critical role in the intracellular trafficking of internalized receptors, thereby dictating the ultimate fate of the receptor. In addition, arrestins have now been shown to be required for the recycling of GPCRs that are capable of internalizing through arrestin-independent mechanisms. This review will summarize recent advances in our understanding of the roles of arrestins in post-endocytic GPCR trafficking.     

Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success

Among membrane-bound receptors, the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are certainly the most diverse. They have been very successful during evolution, being capable of transducing messages as different as photons, organic odorants, nucleotides, nucleosides, peptides, lipids and proteins. Indirect studies, as well as two-dimensional crystallization of rhodopsin, have led to a useful model of a common 'central core', composed of seven transmembrane helical domains, and its structural modifications during activation. There are at least six families of GPCRs showing no sequence similarity. They use an amazing number of different domains both to bind their ligands and to activate G proteins. The fine-tuning of their coupling to G proteins is regulated by splicing, RNA editing and phosphorylation. Some GPCRs have been found to form either homo- or heterodimers with a structurally different GPCR, but also with membrane-bound proteins having one transmembrane domain such as nina-A, odr-4 or RAMP, the latter being involved in their targeting, function and pharmacology. Finally, some GPCRs are unfaithful to G proteins and interact directly, via their C-terminal domain, with proteins containing PDZ and Enabled/VASP homology (EVH)-like domains.