Interaction between RNA polymerase and a ribosomal RNA promoter of E. coli.

The interaction between RNA polymerase and the E. coli ribosomal (r) RNA promoter(s) of the rrnE operon has been studied by the filter-binding method. The extent of complex formation between RNA polymerase and rrnE promoter(s) is salt-dependent; ppGpp specifically inhibits interaction of RNA polymerase with the rrnE promoter(s). A tentative model is proposed for the molecular events in the early steps of rRNA initiation: a transition of the primarily formed, labile RNA polymerase-rRNA promoter complex to a more stable form is the determining step. This step is salt-sensitive; ppGpp acts on this "isomerization".     

rpoB mutation in Escherichia coli alters control of ribosome synthesis by guanosine tetraphosphate.

An isogenic pair of relA+ and relA strains of Escherichia coli B/r with a mutation in the RNA polymerase subunit gene rpoB (Rifr) was isolated in which the relationship between guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) concentration and stable RNA (rRNA, tRNA) gene activity was altered. The RNA polymerase in the rpoB strains was found to be about 20-fold more sensitive to ppGpp with respect to its stable RNA promoter activity than was the wild-type enzyme. The existence of such mutants is consistent with the idea that ppGpp interacts with the RNA polymerase enzyme and thereby alters its promoter selectivity, i.e., reduces its affinity for the stable RNA promoters. Under most conditions, the rpoB mutants had a reduced rate of growth and about a 10-fold-reduced intracellular concentration of ppGpp compared with the rpoB wild-type strains. The reduction of the level of ppGpp in the rpoB mutants during exponential growth was presumably a reflection of an indirect effect of the rpoB mutation on the control of relA-independent ppGpp metabolism.     

Influence of the GCGC discriminator motif introduced into the ribosomal RNA P2- and tac promoter on growth-rate control and stringent sensitivity.

The synthesis of stable RNA in bacteria is known to be regulated by a stringent control mechanism. Characteristic of stringent-regulated promoters, all ribosomal RNA promoters P1, but not P2, contain a GC-rich discriminator sequence assumed to be important for such a control. Using site-directed mutagenesis we have altered both the rrnB P2 and the synthetic tac promoter to the consensus GCGC discriminator motif. The modified promoters were placed upstream of the structural gene encoding the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. The response of the modified promoters to amino acid starvation, changes in the growth rate or differences in the basal level of guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) were determined in vivo. The results clearly show, that the discriminator motif is sufficient to convert the ribosomal RNA promoter P2 to a stringent, as well as growth-rate regulated, promoter. By contrast, the same discriminator sequence linked to the synthetic tac promoter does not convert this promoter to either stringency or growth-rate regulation. Finally, the results presented in this study reinforce the view that stringent and growth-rate regulation utilize the same mechanism, with ppGpp being the common mediator.     

Interaction of RNA polymerase with promoters from bacteriophage fd.

Replicative form DNA of bacteriophage fd, which had been fragmented with the restriction endonuclease II from Hemophilus parainfluenzae (endo R- HpaII), was reacted with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase; the resulting stable preinitiation complexes were analysed using the filter binding assay followed by gel electrophoresis. At 120mM KCL the first-order rate constants for complex decay were determined to be 10(-2)-10(-6)s-1. The second-order rate constants for complex formation were found to be about 10(6) -10(7) M-1 s-1. From these values association constants for the individual promoters were calculated to be 2 x 10(-8) -2 x 10(-11) M-1. The rate of formation and the stability of promoter complexes was enhanced in superhelical DNA. No evidence was found for stable promoter-specific closed complexes consisting of enzyme and helical DNA. This and the kinetic data suggest that the unwinding of base pairs is already important early in promoter selection, and not only for the formation of the final open complex. The initiation of RNA synthesis form the preinitiation complex was faster than complex dissociation and complex formation for all promoters. Consequently, the initiation efficiency of a promoter is determined by the rate of complex formation, and not by its 'affinity' for the enzyme. No correlation was found between the relative order of the fd promoters for the binding and the dissociation reaction. This is explained by different structural determinants, for the two reactions, which are located in different parts of the promoter DNA.